motion to dismiss petition on appeal - rdw 18 dec 2014.pdf

Upload: sistermarylisa

Post on 02-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Motion to Dismiss Petition on Appeal - RDW 18 Dec 2014.PDF

    1/8

    Ron D. Wilkinson (5558)Nathan S. Shill (11961)HERITAGE LAW OFFICES

    898 South State Street, Suite 100Orem, UT 84097Telephone: (801) 225-6040

    [email protected]

    Attorneys for Father

    IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

    IN THE INTEREST OF:

    Wolferts, Sydney (05-24-1999)

    Wolferts, Danielle(10-29-2000),

    Children under eighteen years old.

    MOTION TO DISMISS

    PETITION ON APPEAL

    Court of Appeals No.: 20141054-CAJuvenile Court No.: 1102018, 1102109

    Brian Wolferts, Father in the above identified child welfare proceeding, through his

    attorney, Ron D. Wilkinson, moves this Court to dismiss the Appellants Petition on Appeal for

    the reasons stated herein.

    FACTS

    1. On November 5, 2014, the Honorable Brent H. Bartholomew issued a Denial of

    Motion for Service by Publication & Order Dismissing Action.

    2.

    The order was prepared by Judge Bartholomew.

    3. The order did not include language that directed the parties that no additional

    order was necessary. See Denial of Motion for Service by Publication & Order Dismissing

    Action, attached herein as Exhibit A.

    1

  • 8/10/2019 Motion to Dismiss Petition on Appeal - RDW 18 Dec 2014.PDF

    2/8

    4.

    Appellants, Brittany Wolferts and Judith Olson, appealed the November 5, 2014

    order entered by Judge Bartholomew.

    ARGUMENT

    The Utah Supreme Court has held that whenever a court intends any document to

    constitute its final action, the court must explicitly direct that no additional order is necessary.

    Otherwise, rule (f)(2) requires the preparation and entry of a separate order in conformity with

    the courts decision. Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp., 2009 UT 2, 32 (internal quotations

    omitted). In this matter, the order appealed by Appellants, Brittany Wolferts and Judith Olson, is

    not a final order of the court. The court issued its order, but did not include an explicit direction

    that no additional order is necessary.

    As this matter is not an appeal from a final order, this Court should dismiss the Petition

    on Appeal filed by Appellants.

    DATED: December 18, 2014.

    /s/ Ron D. WilkinsonRon D. Wilkinson, Attorney for Father

    2

  • 8/10/2019 Motion to Dismiss Petition on Appeal - RDW 18 Dec 2014.PDF

    3/8

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I certify that on December 18, 2014, I emailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing

    Motion to Dismiss Petition on Appeal to the following:

    Scott Weight

    [email protected]

    Trent V. Cahill

    [email protected]

    T. McKay Stirland

    Guardian ad Litem

    [email protected]

    Sandra Dredge

    Special Master

    [email protected]

    /s/ arh

    3

  • 8/10/2019 Motion to Dismiss Petition on Appeal - RDW 18 Dec 2014.PDF

    4/8

    Exhibit A

  • 8/10/2019 Motion to Dismiss Petition on Appeal - RDW 18 Dec 2014.PDF

    5/8

  • 8/10/2019 Motion to Dismiss Petition on Appeal - RDW 18 Dec 2014.PDF

    6/8

  • 8/10/2019 Motion to Dismiss Petition on Appeal - RDW 18 Dec 2014.PDF

    7/8

  • 8/10/2019 Motion to Dismiss Petition on Appeal - RDW 18 Dec 2014.PDF

    8/8