motor theory remnants

37
Motor Theory Remnants April 3, 2012

Upload: sadah

Post on 15-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Motor Theory Remnants. April 3, 2012. Dirty Work. Project Reports #5 to turn in. On Thursday, we’ll talk about the muscles that control articulation… And do a slightly messy static palatography demo At the end of today, we’ll do the USRI evaluations. Another Piece of the Puzzle. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Motor Theory Remnants

Motor Theory Remnants

April 3, 2012

Page 2: Motor Theory Remnants

Dirty Work• Project Reports #5 to turn in.

• On Thursday, we’ll talk about the muscles that control articulation…

• And do a slightly messy static palatography demo

• At the end of today, we’ll do the USRI evaluations.

Page 3: Motor Theory Remnants

Another Piece of the Puzzle• Another interesting finding which has been used to argue for the “speech is special” theory is duplex perception.

• Take an isolated F3 transition:

and present it to one ear…

Page 4: Motor Theory Remnants

Do the Edges First!• While presenting this spectral frame to the other ear:

Page 5: Motor Theory Remnants

Two Birds with One Spectrogram

• The resulting combo is perceived in duplex fashion:

• One ear hears the F3 “chirp”;

• The other ear hears the combined stimulus as “da”.

Page 6: Motor Theory Remnants

Duplex Interpretation• Check out the spectrograms in Praat.

• Mann and Liberman (1983) found:

• Discrimination of the F3 chirps is gradient when they’re in isolation…

• but categorical when combined with the spectral frame.

• (Compare with the F3 discrimination experiment with Japanese and American listeners)

• Interpretation: the “special” speech processor puts the two pieces of the spectrogram together.

Page 7: Motor Theory Remnants

fMRI data• Benson et al. (2001)

• Non-Speech stimuli = notes, chords, and chord progressions on a piano

Page 8: Motor Theory Remnants

fMRI data• Benson et al. (2001)

• Difference in activation for natural speech stimuli versus activation for sinewave speech stimuli

Page 9: Motor Theory Remnants

Mirror Neurons• In the 1990s, researchers in Italy discovered what they called mirror neurons in the brains of macaques.

• Macaques had been trained to make grasping motions with their hands.

• Researchers recorded the activity of single neurons while the monkeys were making these motions.

• Serendipity:

• the same neurons fired when the monkeys saw the researchers making grasping motions.

• a neurological link between perception and action.

• Motor theory claim: same links exist in the human brain, for the perception of speech gestures

Page 10: Motor Theory Remnants

Moving On…• One important lesson to take from the motor theory perspective is:

• The dynamics of speech are generally more important to perception than static acoustic cues.

• Note: visual chimerism and March Madness.

Page 11: Motor Theory Remnants

Auditory Chimeras• Speech waveform + music spectrum:

• Music waveform + speech spectrum:

frequency bands

1 2 4 8 16 32

frequency bands

1 2 4 8 16 32

Source: http://research.meei.harvard.edu/chimera/chimera_demos.html

Originals:

Page 12: Motor Theory Remnants

Auditory Chimeras• Speech1 waveform + speech2 spectrum:

• Speech2 waveform + speech1 spectrum:

frequency bands

1 2 4 6 8 16

frequency bands

1 2 4 6 8 16

Originals:

Page 13: Motor Theory Remnants

Motor Theory, in a nutshell• The big idea:

• We perceive speech as abstract “gestures”, not sounds.

• Evidence:

1. The perceptual interpretation of speech differs radically from the acoustic organization of speech sounds

2. Speech perception is multi-modal

3. Direct (visual, tactile) information about gestures can influence/override indirect (acoustic) speech cues

4. Limited top-down access to the primary, acoustic elements of speech

Page 14: Motor Theory Remnants

Audition (or, how we hear things)

April 3, 2012

Page 15: Motor Theory Remnants

How Do We Hear?• The ear is the organ of hearing. It converts sound waves into electrical signals in the brain.

• the process of “audition”

• The ear has three parts:

• The Outer Ear

• sound is represented acoustically (in the air)

• The Middle Ear

• sound is represented mechanically (in solid bone)

• The Inner Ear

• sound is represented in a liquid

Page 16: Motor Theory Remnants

The Ear

Page 17: Motor Theory Remnants

Outer Ear Fun Facts• The pinna, or auricle, is a bit more receptive to sounds from the front than sounds from the back.

• It functions primarily as “an earring holder”.

• Sound travels down the ear canal, or auditory meatus.

• Length 2 - 2.5 cm

• Sounds between 3500-4000 Hz resonate in the ear canal

• The tragus protects the opening to the ear canal.

• Optionally provides loudness protection.

• The outer ear dead ends at the eardrum, or tympanic membrane.

Page 18: Motor Theory Remnants

The Middle Ear

eardrum

the hammer (malleus)

the anvil (incus)

the stirrup (stapes)

Page 19: Motor Theory Remnants

The Middle Ear• The bones of the middle ear are known as the ossicles.

• They function primarily as an amplifier.

• = increase sound pressure by about 20-25 dB

• Works by focusing sound vibrations into a smaller area

• area of eardrum = .55 cm2

• area of footplate of stapes = .032 cm2

• Think of a thumbtack...

Page 20: Motor Theory Remnants

Concentration• Pressure (on any given area) = Force / Area

• Pushing on a cylinder provides no gain in force at the other end...

• Areas are equal on both sides.

• Pushing on a thumb tack provides a gain in force equal to A1 / A2.

• For the middle ear , force gain

• .55 / .032 17

Page 21: Motor Theory Remnants

Leverage• The middle ear also exerts a lever action on the inner ear.

• Think of a crowbar...

• Force difference is proportional to ratio of handle length to end length.

• For the middle ear:

• malleus length / stapes length

• ratio 1.3

Page 22: Motor Theory Remnants

Conversions• Total amplification of middle ear 17 * 1.3 22

• increases sound pressure by 20 - 25 dB

• Note: people who have lost their middle ear bones can still hear...

• With a 20-25 dB loss in sensitivity.

• (Fluid in inner ear absorbs 99.9% of acoustic energy)

• For loud sounds (> 85-90 dB), a reflex kicks in to attenuate the vibrations of the middle ear.

• this helps prevent damage to the inner ear.

Page 23: Motor Theory Remnants

The Attenuation Reflex• Requires 50-100 msec of reaction time.

• Poorly attenuates sudden loud noises

• Muscles fatigue after 15 minutes or so

• Also triggered by speaking

tensor tympani

stapedius

Page 24: Motor Theory Remnants

The Inner Ear• In the inner ear there is a snail-shaped structure called the cochlea.

• The cochlea:

• is filled with fluid

• consists of several different membranes

• terminates in membranes called the oval window and the round window.

Page 25: Motor Theory Remnants

Cochlea Cross-Section

• The inside of the cochlea is divided into three sections.

• In the middle of them all is the basilar membrane.

Page 26: Motor Theory Remnants

Contact

• On top of the basilar membrane are rows of hair cells.

• We have about 3,500 “inner” hair cells...

• and 15,000-20,000 “outer” hair cells.

Page 27: Motor Theory Remnants

How does it work?• On top of each hair cell is a set of about 100 tiny hairs (stereocilia).

• Upward motion of the basilar membrane pushes these hairs into the tectorial membrane.

• The deflection of the hairs opens up channels in the hair cells.

• ...allowing the electrically charged endolymph to flow into them.

• This sends a neurochemical signal to the brain.

Page 28: Motor Theory Remnants

An Auditory Fourier Analysis• Individual hair cells in the cochlea respond best to particular frequencies.

• General limits:

20 Hz - 20,000 Hz

• Cells at the base respond to high frequencies;

• Cells at the apex respond to low.tonotopic organization of the

cochlea

Page 29: Motor Theory Remnants

How does this work?• Hermann von Helmholtz (again!) first proposed the place theory of cochlear organization.

• Original idea: one hair cell for each frequency.

• a.k.a. the “resonance theory”

• But...we can perceive more frequencies than we have hair cells for.

• The rate theory emerged as an alternative:

• Frequency of cell firing encodes frequencies in the acoustic signal.

• a.k.a. the “frequency theory”

• Problem: cell firing rate is limited to 1000 Hz...

Page 30: Motor Theory Remnants

Synthesis• The volley theory attempted to salvage the frequency rate proposal.

• Idea: frequency rates higher than 1000 Hz are “volleyed” back and forth between individual hair cells.

• There is evidently considerable evidence for this proposal.

Page 31: Motor Theory Remnants

Traveling Waves (in the ear!)• Last but not least, there is the traveling wave theory.

• Idea: waves of different frequencies travel to a different extent along the cochlea.

• Like wavelength:

• Higher frequency waves are shorter

• Lower frequency waves are longer

Page 32: Motor Theory Remnants

The Traveling Upshot• Lower frequency waves travel the length of the cochlea...

• but higher frequencies cut off after a short distance.

• All cells respond to lower frequencies (to some extent),

• but fewer cells respond to high frequency waves.

• Individual hair cells thus function like low-pass filters.

Page 33: Motor Theory Remnants

Hair Cell Bandwidth

• Each hair cell responds to a range of frequencies, centered around an optimal characteristic frequency.

Page 34: Motor Theory Remnants

Frequency Perception• In reality, there is (unfortunately?) more than one truth--

• Place-encoding (traveling wave theory) is probably more important for frequencies above 1000 Hz;

• Rate-encoding (volley theory) is probably more important for frequencies below 1000 Hz.

• Interestingly, perception of frequencies above 1000 Hz is much less precise than perception of frequencies below 1000 Hz.

• Match this tone:

• To the tone that is twice the frequency:

Page 35: Motor Theory Remnants

Higher Up• Now try it with this tone:

• Compared to these tones:

• Idea: listeners interpret pitch differences as (absolute) distances between hair cells in the cochlea.

• Perceived pitch is expressed in units called mels.

• Twice the number of mels = twice as high of a perceived pitch.

• Mels = 1127.01048 * ln (1 + F/700)

• where acoustic frequency (F) is expressed in Hertz.

Page 36: Motor Theory Remnants

The Mel Scale

Page 37: Motor Theory Remnants

Equal Loudness Curves• Perceived loudness also depends on frequency.