mountain house community services district staff …

CONSENT ITEM 8.8

230 S. Sterling Drive, Suite 100, Mountain House, CA 95391

Tel (209) 831-2300 • Fax (209) 831-5610

1229473-2

MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT “To provide responsive service to our growing community

that exceeds expectations at a fair value”

STAFF REPORT

AGENDA TITLE: Authorize a Contract with Harris & Associates (Harris) to Provide Cost

Certification Audit Services for a Contract Amount up to $335,270 with

an Optional Contract Extension for an Additional 2 Years up to $500,000

for Future Cost Certification Services.

MEETING DATE: October 10, 2018

PREPARED BY: Nader Shareghi P.E., Public Works Director

Anush Nejad P.E., Deputy Public Works Director

Anthony Docto, Engineer V

______________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Mountain House Community Services District (MHCSD) Board of

Directors (Board) approve the contract for the Cost Certification Audit up to the amount of

$335,270 and authorize the General Manager to negotiate and execute the final contract with

Harris and Associates (Harris) with an optional contract extension for an additional 2 years up to

$500,000 for future cost certification services.

BACKGROUND:

The Mountain House Community Services District issued a Request for Proposals for

Professional Construction and Other Related Cost Certification Audit Services on August 28,

2018, related to Transportation Impact Fee (TIF), Community Facility Fee (CFF) and Utility

projects implemented by MHD and MHI in Mountain House. Three firms were invited to submit

proposal for these services. These firms were: NV5, SNG Associates (SNG), and Harris &

Associates. Background information was shared with all three firms and each firm was invited to

schedule a time to review the background information and to ask questions regarding the goals

and requirements for the project. Responses to all questions were provided to all proposers.

MHCSD received two proposals by the due date, September 21, 2018, from SNG and Harris;

NV5 submitted a letter declining to submit a proposal due to their workload issues.

MHCSD staff evaluated the two proposals by the evaluation committee, which was comprised of

the Director of Public Works, the Deputy Director of Public Works and an Engineer V. The

committee ranked the two firms based on the selection criteria and unanimously selected Harris

& Associates, based on both Qualifications (80%) and Cost (20%) selection criteria.

Staff negotiated the cost with Harris, which originally was $360,310. Based on negotiation,

Harris reduced their original fee estimate by $25,040 to $330,270.

CONSENT ITEM 8.8


Tel (209) 831-2300 • Fax (209) 831-5610

1229473-2

The RFP also provides a provision to extend the contract at the District’s discretion, for two (2)

additional years, if required for future utility TIF and CFF projects cost certification. For these

services, Harris can provide these services on a time and materials basis, based on the hourly

rates shown in the proposal, subject to CPI escalation for each year after December 31, 2019, up

to December 31, 2021.

Both MHD and MHI have reviewed the final proposal and fee estimates and have agreed to

reimburse CSD for the full amount of the audit certification process, based on their respective

project certification project list.

DISCUSSION:

Mountain House Developers (MHD) has entered into a Master Acquisition and Reimbursement

Agreement (MARA) as well as Project Acquisition Agreements (PAA) for Utilities and Project

Reimbursement Agreements (PRA) for TIF and CFF facilities. For the TIF and CFF facilities,

the developers may receive a combination of reimbursement and credits. MHCSD is responsible

for verifying the accuracy of the submitted costs and determining the maximum allowable

reimbursement under the CFF and TIF programs. For the wet utilities, the Developers receives

reimbursement through the pledged revenue components funded through property owners’ utility

bills.

Properly certifying the costs of projects is important for the success of the TIF and CFF

programs. These certified costs affect the CFF and TIF fee programs as well as the annexation

fee calculated for annexing properties. In addition, this process determines the reimbursements

that each Developer receives and is integral in setting future fees.

For the current project, the following projects will be included in the cost certification process.

MHI Project List

Project Name CFF/TIF/Utility Current Developer

Reimbursement Request 1

1 Backbone Infrastructure TIF/Utility $311,166.36

2 Central Parkway TIF $4,598,373.13

3 Community Park CFF $80,718.53

4 De Anza Boulevard TIF $1,579,190.07

5 Drainage A Utility $878,815.08

6 Drainage B Utility $668,451.34

7 Drainage - Clean Utility $2,331,714.98

8 Grant Line Road TIF $2,615,336.34

9 Joint Trench – Central Parkway (SPII & TIF/Utility $168,481

1 Reimbursement Requests are estimates and are subject to change

CONSENT ITEM 8.8


Tel (209) 831-2300 • Fax (209) 831-5610

1229473-2


Reimbursement Request 1

SPIII)

10 Joint Trench – De Anza Boulevard TIF/Utility $546,456.64

11 Joint Trench – Grant Line Road TIF/Utility $1,058,206.10

12 Mountain House Parkway Widening TIF $989,662.27

13 Processing and Planning (project approvals) TIF/CFF/Utility $7,790,104.58

14 Sewer – Central Parkway Utility $541,160.04

15 Sewer (De Anza Blvd. North of Grant Line

Road, Grant Line Road, Central to Alameda

County

Utility $450,706.11

16 Sewer Truck Line Utility $383,844.33

17 Utility Corridor Landscaping Utility $28,709.27

18 Water – Central Parkway Utility $1,096,782.50

19 Water – De Anza Boulevard Utility $617,250.97

20 Water Grant Line Road Utility $51,072.67

21 Water Quality Basin Utility $393,219.06

Total: $27,179,422.07

MHD Project List


Reimbursement

Request 2

1 Central Parkway (Mustang to Grant Line) #1 TIF/Utility $3,148,620

2 Great Valley Parkway (Mustang to Grant Line) TIF/Utility $5,600,000

3 Byron Road (GVP to MHP) TIF/Utility $4,800,000

4 Great Valley Parkway (DeAnza to Byron) TIF/Utility $4,900,000

5 Central Parkway Overcrossing TIF/Utility $5,000,000

6 Mustang (GVP to Central) TIF $1,700,000

7 Mustang (Central to DeAnza) TIF $1,800,000

8 Traffic Signal (Mustang and Central) TIF $300,000

2 Reimbursement Requests are estimates and are subject to change

CONSENT ITEM 8.8


Tel (209) 831-2300 • Fax (209) 831-5610

1229473-2


Reimbursement

Request 2

9 Central Parkway (DeAnza to Byron) TIF $500,000

10 DeAnza (GVP to Central) TIF $400,000

11 Grant Line Road (GVP to Central) TIF $600,000

12 Grant Line Road (Central to Prosperity) TIF $400,000

13 Traffic Signal (Great Valley and Kelso Road) TIF $200,000

14 Traffic Signal (Great Valley and Byron) TIF $200,000

Total: $29,148,620

FISCAL IMPACT:

These services will be reimbursed by MHD and MHI and there is no fiscal impact to the District.

STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: Approving the contract with Harris will help staff achieve the following Public Works Goals:

Goal #J.2: Execute and enforce agreements and conditions of approvals

ACTION FOLLOWING BOARD APPROVAL: Upon Board approval, staff will finalize the contract with Harris and the General Manager will

execute the agreement with Harris for the current services, and if required and warranted,

negotiate a contract for two additional years of services, up to $500,000, based on Harris’

‘approved hourly rate schedule as detailed in the proposal.

ATTACHMENT:

Attachment A: Request for Proposals, dated August 31, 2018

Attachment B: Harris and SNG Proposals

Attachment C: Harris Cost Certification Board Agreement

Attachment D: Resolution 2018-60 Authorizing the General Manager to negotiate an agreement

with Harris & Associates to provide cost certification audit services.

c: District Counsel

CONSENT ITEM 8.8 ATTACHMENT A

COST CERTIFICATION AUDIT SERVICES PROPOSAL

MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTSeptember 21, 2018

CONTACT PERSON:Alison Bouley, PE Project Director 1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500Concord, CA 94520 [email protected]

CONSENT ITEM 8.8 ATTACHMENT B

Harris & Associates, Inc. Table of Contents B

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cover Letter ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1

1. Independence ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2

2. Insurance Requirements ..................................................................................................................................................... 2

3. Firm Qualifications and Experience ................................................................................................................................... 3

5. Project Manager/Supervisor and Staff Qualifications and Experience ........................................................................10

6. Project Approach ...............................................................................................................................................................11

7. Identification of Anticipated Potential Construction and Related Cost Audit Problems ............................................16

8. References ..........................................................................................................................................................................18

9. Additional Information Required .....................................................................................................................................18

10. Delegation or subcontract responsibilities ...................................................................................................................18

11. Cost Proposal ...................................................................................................................................................................19

Appendix: Resumes ..................................................................................................................................................................I


Harris & Associates, Inc. 1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500, Concord, CA 94520 925.827.4900 www.WeAreHarris.com 1

September 21, 2018

Mr. Anthony DoctoMountain House Community Services District230 S. Sterling Dr., Suite# 100Mountain House, CA 95391

Cost Certification Audit Services Proposal

Dear Mr. Anthony Docto:

Harris & Associates (Harris) has been honored to be involved with the establishment and growth of Mountain House over the past 17 years. Harris’ professional services, provided both in the field and office, have been an integral part of completing new infrastructure in Mountain House. During our partnership working with the Mountain House Community Services District (District) on these projects, Harris has developed a trusted advisor relationship supporting the District. We are excited to share our success stories on those and similar projects with you and utilize our experience to identify opportuni-ties to create a streamlined and well documented cost certification program.

Mountain House is a master planned community whereby master developers have built and continue to build the required infrastructure. The District is responsible for certifying the costs for accuracy and eligibility for developer reimbursement and credits. Properly reviewing and documenting the cost certification process is essential in the long term success of the programs. The District has recently received $60 million in reimbursement requests and must certify the costs within 6 months to meet the Shea Annexation Fee timelines. The Harris team believes itself to be best qualified and will bring you the following key advantages:

Commitment to Schedule. Harris understand the Districts need for all project audits to be completed within 4-months of the notice to proceed. The Harris team has the bench strength and in-house technical expertise to adapt to changing workloads. This means reimbursement submittals will be reviewed in compliance with the timeline specified. Harris has developed many tools and processes that will minimize not only the time and effort required by our staff to review each submittal, but also the time and energy of the District staff, freeing you to focus on more pressing issues. We will draw upon the experience of our on-site construction management staff as well as our pavement management staff to assist in field review of the improvements.

Public Finance Experts. Harris & Associates (Harris) has been in business for 43 years and has a staff of 217. Harris has provided acquisition audit and annual administration services to public agencies for more than 19 years, completing over $981 million in Reimbursement Audit reviews. Harris has successfully solved many different challenges in processing reimbursement requests. Harris will work with the project team to develop protocols and tools that increase efficiencies for all parties involved. These tools will provide real-time tracking, detailed documentation and timely approvals. This stream-lined process provide a transparent and documented trail of certified costs. This documentation is extremely important to be able to provide to future developers, Board members, and utility rate payers.

This Agreement shall be binding for 180 days from the date of submittal.

Sincerely, Harris & Associates, Inc.

Alison Bouley, PE Project Director 1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500, Concord, CA [email protected]

Dennis Klingelhofer, PE Vice President, Public Finance 1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500, Concord, CA 94520800.827.4901 ext. [email protected]


Harris & Associates, Inc. 1. Independence & 2. Insurance Requirements 2

1. INDEPENDENCE

Harris is independent of the MHCSD as defined by generally accepted auditing standards and the US General Accounting Office's Government Auditing Standards.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Harris has had a long partnership with Mountain House over the past 17 years. Projects completed under contract with Mountain House over the last five years include:

• CFF, TIF and Annexation Fee Update• Inspection - Roads (On-Call Services)• Trimark Arterial (On-Call Services)• Trimark NR (On-Call Services)• Shea TIF (On-Call Services)• Shea NR (On-Call Services)• 2012-2013 PMP• On-Call Engineering Services• Trimark (On-Call Services)• Shea Homes (On-Call Services)• 2014-2015 PMP• 2016 PMP• On-Call Inspection Services

• Developers Non-Reimbursable (MHD.NR) (On-CallServices)

• Developers Comm Facility Fund (On-Call Services)• Developers Transportation Infrastructure Fund

(On-Call Services)• Builder Inspections (On-Call Services)• Annexation Fee• 2016-17 PMP• FY17/18 Non-Reimbursable Inspection Services• FY17/18 Transportation Improvement Fee Inspection

Services• FY17/18 Home Builder Fund - Inspection Services• FY17/18 Inspection Services• Non-Reimbursable ((FY 18/19) On-Call Inspection

Services)• Transportation Improvement Fee ((FY 18/19) On-Call

Inspection Services)• Community Facilities Fee ((FY 18/19) On-Call

Inspection Services)• FY 18/19 Financial Services

Harris has not had a contract directly with Mountain House Developers (MHD) or Mountain House Investors (MHI) and there is no conflict of interest relative to performing the proposed audit.

2. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Harris meets or exceeds the insurance requirements listed by the District in the RFP. Prior to commencing any work, Harris shall provide the District proper certificates demonstrating that the types and amounts of insurance coverage specified and any endorsements required hereunder are properly issued and in effect, and provide that the District, its officers, employees and agents are named additional insured's under the policy.


Harris & Associates, Inc. 3. Firm Qualifications and Experience 3

3. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

Harris has served public agencies since 1974. We have developed a robust program of services that offer our clients expertise and assistance in various realms of public finance, engineering services, program and construction management, and environmental services.

Harris combines the input of our engineers, financial specialists, and construction professionals to provide the District with a streamlined and cost certification audit process.

Harris’ public finance team provides our clients with a broad range of public financing and assessment engineering services. We have extensive experience in all aspects of financial engineering and are considered experts in our field; keeping up on court cases and presenting at seminars and conferences. Our unique combination of being engineers and financial experts allows us to provide a host of services to our clients without the need to team, resulting in the cost effective delivery of our services. In addition, we often serve as an extension of our clients’ staff, which allows us to see the long-term implementation of our programs. This perspective allows us to see the overall effectiveness of a program and offers the opportunity to constantly adjust and improve our service to clients.

Harris has developed policies, procedures, and tools to streamline the review process while providing thorough documentation and tracking. We have developed tracking spreadsheets, checklists, and guidelines that streamline the process. These tools help verify that all team members, including the developer and the District, are on the same page with submittal requirements and timelines.

Our team is commonly engaged in negotiating and developing acquisition agreements, development agreements, and policy and procedure manuals. This experience means we can anticipate the challenges and develop processes to prevent common pitfalls.

Harris’ team has been working with the District the last two years to update the CFF and TIF program and develop the Annexation Fee process. Harris has reviewed and is familiar with the many governing agreements and ordinances in Mountain House. In addition, our construction management staff are on sight and are intimately familiar with the status of the infrastructure in Mountain House.

The matrix on the following page identifies a list of the Harris team’s Cost Certification Audit experience totaling $981 million, where we delivered projects of similar scope and complexity.

19+ years of reimbursement

audit experience

$981 million in completed reimbursement audits

100+ public agencies served in California

17 years working for Mountain House

HARRIS BY THE

NUMBERS

Team Engagement

Lynn Filson, PE, RLS Project Manager 60-70%

Alison Bouley, PEProject Director 15-20%

Ben Caragan, CPA, MBAAudit Oversight 60-70%

Anna Tan-Gatue, PELead Audit Engineer 25-50%

Joel Nagamine, EITProject Engineer 60-70%

Nick Kral, MBASenior Analyst 50-60%

Tim Nguyen, MBA Senior Analyst 60-70%

Pat PerinichAnalyst 60-70%

Adam MarstonAnalyst 40-50%

Diana ShengAnalyst 50-60%

Mike Duarte, PELead Engineer 5-10%

Vijay Pulijal, PEProject Engineer 20-30%

Paul MuseInspector 40-50%

Marissa BacligInspector 40-50%

FIRM: Regional

LOCATION OF OFFICE:1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500 Concord, CA 94520

SIZE OF FIRM: 217 Employees

SIZE OF FIRM STAFF: 34

AUTHORIZED CONTACT:Alison Bouley, PE Project Director 1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500 Concord, CA 94520925.827.4900 ext. [email protected]

STAFF:Harris has the right team to complete your project on schedule.



COST CERTIFICATION EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW

Total Constr.

Cost (millions)

Cost Certification/ Acquisition Audit Projects R

oadw

ay G

radi

ng

Dra

inag

e Fa

cilit

ies

Str

eet /

Tra

ffic

Impr

ovem

ents

Wat

er /

Sew

er Im

prov

emen

ts

Fac

ilitie

s Rel

ocat

ion

/ Dem

oliti

on

Pkw

y / L

ands

cp. I

mpr

ovem

ents

Brid

ge A

butm

ent G

radi

ng

Brid

ge Im

prov

emen

ts

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

Lib

rary

/ Fi

re S

tatio

n Fa

cilit

y

Site

Impr

ovem

ents

Par

k &

Recr

eatio

n Fa

cilit

ies

$16.9 City of Alameda - Alameda Landing CFD 13-1

$17.3 City of Carlsbad - Assessment District No. 96-1 (Rancho Carrillo)

$17.1 Clark County, NV - SID #132 (Summerlin Village 15A / 18)

$16.9 Clark County, NV - SID #151 (Summerlin South)

$22.4 Clark County, NV - SID #159 (Summerlin Village 16A)

$3.6 City of Elk Grove - Reimbursements Citywide

$31.0 City of Henderson (NV) - LID T-18 (Inspirada) $0.2 City of Henderson (NV) - LID T-16 (The Falls at Lake Las Vegas)

$29.2 City of Lake Elsinore - Canyon Hills CFD No. 2003-2

$43.1 City of Lake Elsinore - Rosetta Canyon CFD No. 2004-3

$6.8 City of Lake Elsinore - Serenity CFD No. 2005-1

$20.5 City of Lake Elsinore - Alberhill CFD No. 2005-2

$2.2 City of Lake Elsinore - Wasson Canyon CFD No. 2005-5

$2.9 City of Lake Elsinore - City Center CFD No. 2005-6

$12.6 City of Lake Elsinore - Summerly CFD No. 2006-1

$5.9 City of Lake Elsinore - Viscaya CFD No. 2006-2

$14.8 City of Lake Elsinore - RDA Project Areas II & III

$5.5 City of Lake Elsinore - Dev. Impact Fee Reimbursement Audits

$1.0 City of Madera - Reimbursements Citywide

$10.9 City of Mesquite (NV) - SID 07-01(Anthem At Mesquite)

$8.3 Monterey County - East Garrison CFD No 2006-1

$2.5 City of Moreno Valley CFD No. 4 (Centerpointe Business Park)

$4.8 City of Moreno Valley CFD No. 5 (Stoneridge Ranch)

$27.0 City of Orange - CFD No. 91-2 (Serrano Heights)

$37.7 County of Orange - Rancho Santa Margarita CFD's 86-1, 86-2 and 87-5

$18.0 County of Orange - Coto de Caza CFD 87-8

$0.5 City of Poway - Assessment District No. 2001-1

$3.4 City of Poway - Old Coach Estates Reimbursement District

$47.3 City of Sacramento - North Natomas Development Project

$4.0 City of Sacramento - McKinley Village

Firm ExperienceHarris has been performing cost certification audits for 19 years for agencies throughout California and Nevada. Our experience is summarized in the table below and project descriptions for similar projects can be found on the following pages.



Total Constr.

Cost (millions)

Cost Certification/ Acquisition Audit Projects R

oadw

ay G

radi

ng

Dra

inag

e Fa

cilit

ies

Str

eet /

Tra

ffic

Impr

ovem

ents

Wat

er /

Sew

er Im

prov

emen

ts

Fac

ilitie

s Rel

ocat

ion

/ Dem

oliti

on

Pkw

y / L

ands

cp. I

mpr

ovem

ents

Brid

ge A

butm

ent G

radi

ng

Brid

ge Im

prov

emen

ts

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

Lib

rary

/ Fi

re S

tatio

n Fa

cilit

y

Site

Impr

ovem

ents

Par

k &

Recr

eatio

n Fa

cilit

ies

$5.3 City of Sacramento - Curits Park Village

$6.0 City of San Clemente - CFD No. 99-1 (Plaza Pacifica)

$456.0 City and County of San Francisco - Mission Bay CFD

$23.0 City and County of San Francisco - Hunters Point Shipyard

$0.8 City of Temecula - CFD No. 01-02 (Harveston)

$5.0 City of Tracy - Plan C Development Area

$5.0 City of Tracy - I-205 Development Area

$34.0 City of Tracy - Cordes Ranch Development Area

$5.4 City of Tracy - Tracy Hills Phase IA

$5.1 Transportation Corridor Agencies - Foothill Trans. Corridor Districts

$1.5 City of Vista - San Clemente Avenue Reimbursement District

Total: $981.4 Million



MISSION BAY & HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD REDEVELOPMENT REIMBURSEMENT AUDITSCity & County of San Francisco

Since 2002, Harris has been assisting the City of San Francisco in the acquisition of completed public improve-ments in two redevelopment areas, which to date total $479 million in public facilities.

Harris developed a project priority tracking list to track and monitor all outstanding reimbursement requests. This was used by all parties to track the status of outstanding items and to prioritize the processing of payment requests for facility acquisitions based upon MBDG’s priorities.

Our team worked with MBDG to develop protocols for the electronic submittal of reimbursement requests, which reduced the overall review time needed.

Mission Bay: This mixed-use brownfield redevelopment project is entitled for 6,000 residential units, a 500-room hotel, 280,000 SF of pedestrian-friendly retail space, 4.4 million SF of office and bio-tech lab space, a 57-acre UCSF biotech campus, and a 550-bed hospital.

To date, Harris has recommended the reimbursement/ acquisition of over $456 million in public infrastructure. These improvements were funded by two CFDs that were formed to finance much of the needed public infrastruc-ture. Project acquisitions are expected to continue until all infrastructure is completed. Reimbursement requests have included a wide variety of public infrastructure including roadways, wet and dry utilities, and parks as well as costs for design, environmental mitigation and freeway demolition.

Hunters Point Shipyard: Harris has provided Reimbursement Audit services for the City and County of San Francisco, which is working with a developer to redevelop the 490 acre site. The reimbursement of costs for public facilities is funded by $34 million in Mello-Roos CFD bonds. To date, over $23 million in reimbursement requests have been reviewed and approved.

Mission Bay Redevelopment, City/County of SanFrancisco.

Rendering of Hunters Point Shipyard Redevelopment, City/County of San Francisco.



COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT & INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCIAL CONSULTATION SERVICESTREASURE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Harris is providing reimbursement audit services to the City and County of San Francisco for the Treasure Island Community Facilities District (CFD) & Infrastructure Facilities District (IRFD). The Treasure Island Development Plan requires the replacement and upgrade of the islands existing infrastructure to support the construction of 8,000 homes and over 400,000 sq of retail space. The community and visitors will also benefit from 300 acres of open space, new transit equipment, modern utilities and community facilities, and geotechnical improvements. Harris will review public improvement project costs, confirm eligibility, and that all requirements of the Acquisition Agreement and applicable codes are satisfied.

Because of Harris’ longtime involvement with the Acquisition Auditing of the City’s Mission Bay Development, the Treasure Island Development Authority (TIDA) and San Francisco Department of Public Works (SFDPW) turned to Harris’ financial experts to provide similar services for the Treasure Island/Yerba Buena Island Development. Harris’ services include advising on acquisition protocols, determining reimbursable expenses, reviewing reimbursement requests, and recommending developer reimbursement for the improvements to be acquired by the City. These improve-ments include, but are not limited to, parks and open space, transit equipment and facilities, new utilities, streets, public facilities, geotechnical improvements, and other public infrastructure. Harris is currently working on the Acquisition Audit Policy and Procedures Manual for the City and will begin review of the submittals once the bonds are sold.



HENDERSON LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS (LID)City of Henderson (NV)

Since 2012, Harris has been assisting the City of Henderson in the acquisition of completed public improvements in Local Improvement Districts, which to date totals $27.7 million in public facilities. Project acquisitions are expected to reach $96 million.

Local Improvement District No. T-16 – The Falls at Lake Las Vegas: This project is entitled for mixed-use residential with common and/or public use elements reserved for golf, trails and slopes, parks, and public access. The reimbursement of costs for public facilities is funded by $37 million in bonds. To date, over $200,000 in reimbursement requests have been reviewed and approved.

Local Improvement District No. T-18 – Inspirada: This project is entitled for mixed use residential with an additional 590 acres of common and/or public use elements reserved for trails and slopes, parks, and public access. Reimbursement of costs for public facilities is funded by $77 million in bonds. To date, over $27.5 million in reimbursement requests have been reviewed and approved.

NORTH NATOMAS MIXED-USE MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITYCity of Sacramento

Harris has been assisting the City of Sacramento in the acquisition of public improvements in the North Natomas Development Area for over 12 years. This project is a 9,038-acre, mixed use master planned community consisting of 28,429 homes, six million square feet of commercial space, six hotels, and 10 million square feet of employment centers. To date, Harris has recommended the reimbursement/acquisition of over $47 million in public infrastructure funded through multiple CFDs and fee programs. Reimbursement requests have included a wide variety of public infrastructure including roadways, signals, bridges, utilities, parks, and bikeways. In addition to the reimbursement audits, Harris updated infrastructure costs in support of the North Natomas Finance Plan update.

REIMBURSEMENT AUDIT FOR EAST GARRISON CFDCity of Monterey

Harris’ services included reviewing the reimbursement request for the East Garrison CFD and preparing a written Audit Report that summarized the improvement costs recommended for reimbursement by the improvement fund. To date, $8.3 million in public facilities and fees have been reimbursed. This was a challenging project given that the developer had taken over the project from a trustee sale and information was somewhat limited while working under a tight timeline. Harris completed the project on time and $3,000 under budget.

Figure Caption XX. Neque velent voluptaqui as dolorest eseque evercias alitio.

Mixed-use development at Lake Las Vegas,City of Henderson.



TRACY HILLS REIMBURSEMENT AUDIT SERVICESCity of Tracy

Harris assisted the City of Tracy in negotiating with the developer on the creation of an Acquisition Agreement as well as a Reimbursement Guide. The negotiations included the developer, the developer’s special district consultant, the City’s CFD consultant, the City attorney and various department staff. Harris provided review and comments on the agreements, and participated in meetings throughout the development of the agreement and reimbursement guide. Harris was successful in negotiating longer review times and policies that provided more protection to the City.

The bonds for this 5,200-unit primarily residential developments were just sold and Harris has completed the review of $5.4M in infrastructure to date.

ALAMEDA LANDING MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTCity of Alameda

This mixed-use redevelopment project is entitled for 300 residential units, 291,000 square feet of retail center, 50,000 square foot water district that includes restaurants and entertainment retail, 400,000 square feet of office space, and green space areas.

Harris provided facility reimbursement acquisition audit services for the City of Alameda, who is working with the developer of the Alameda Landing project to redevelop the site. The reimbursement of costs for public facilities was funded by $20 million in CFD bonds. Harris completed the initial reimbursement audit in time to allow the developer to receive $14.8 million in reim-bursement from the initial bond sale. To date, over $16.9 million in reimbursement requests have been reviewed and recommended for reimbursement.

New housing and infrastructure at Alameda Landing, City of Alameda.

Rendering of the planned community at Tracy Hills, City of Tracy.


Harris & Associates, Inc. 5. Project Manager/Supervisor and Staff Qualifications and Experience 10

5. PROJECT MANAGER/SUPERVISOR AND STAFF QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

TeamHarris has assembled a team of qualified staff who are available to meet the deadlines for this project. Alison Bouley, PE will serve as the Project Director and will provide her Mountain House Experience and knowledge to the team. The project will be led by Lynne Filson, PE, RLS who works out of Harris' Concord office and is familiar with Mountain House having done some of the engineering work in her earlier career. Lynne will be responsible for verifying that all deadlines are met and will assist in coordination with the District Staff, the Harris team, and the developers. Ben Caragan, CPA, MBA, will assist in developing the audit plan and will provide audit oversight to the team. Anna Tan-Gatue, PE will serve as the Lead Audit Engineer drawing on her 15 years of experience performing $570 Million worth of cost certification Audits.

Mike Duarte, PE who is on-site in Mountain House full time, will support our team utilizing his extensive knowledge of Mountain House as well. Harris is committed to completing each assignment on time and on budget. We have done this successfully for our clients over the last 19 years. The many years of Harris' experience and the senior staff leadership will lead to quality of junior staff output.

Mountain House Community Services District

COST REVIEW

Lead Audit Engineer Anna Tan-Gatue, PE

Project Engineers Vijay Pulijal, PE

Joel Nagamine, EIT

Analysts Nick Kral, MBA

Tim Nguyen, MBA Pat Perinich

Adam Marston Diana Sheng

FIELD REVIEW

Lead Engineer Mike Duarte, PE

Inspectors Marissa Baclig

Paul Muse

Project Director Alison Bouley, PE

Legend

Senior-Level Staff Junior-Level Staff

Audit Oversight Ben Caragan, CPA, MBA

Project Manager Lynne Filson, PE, RLS

Resumes for all staff can be found in the appendix section, at the end of this document.


Harris & Associates, Inc. 6. Project Approach 11

6. PROJECT APPROACH

UnderstandingMountain House is a master planned community whereby master developers have built the infrastructure necessary to serve the current population of 20,000 and will continue to build infrastructure to serve the estimated 55,000 residents at build-out. The developers entered into Master Acquisition and Reimbursement Agreements (MARAs) as well as Project Acquisition Agreements (PAAs) for Utilities and Project Reimbursement Agreements (PRAs) for TIF and CFF facil-ities. For the TIF and CFF facilities, the developers receive a combination of reimbursements and credits. The Mountain House CSD is responsible for verifying the accuracy of the submitted costs and determining the maximum allowable reimbursement under these fee programs. For the wet utilities, the Developers receive reimbursement through the pledged revenue component funded through the property owners’ utility bills. It is critical to track the costs associated with Water, Sewer and Storm Drainage separately to main-tain the integrity of this program.

Properly certifying the costs are extremely important to the success of the program moving forward. These certified costs affect the CFF and TIF fee programs as well as the annexation fee program. Not having properly documented and implemented programs opens the District up to legal challenges and potentially costly lawsuits. In addition, this process determines the reimbursements that each Developer receives and is integral is setting future fees. Given the magnitude of the infrastructure costs, minor discrepancies could be costly for all parties involved.

Harris is familiar with these fee programs and the intricacies of the various agreements and will not have a learning curve in getting up to speed. We are currently updating the TIF and CFF fee programs and are familiar with the program limits and why accurately documenting cost certification is critical. Given the plan to prepare annual or bi-annual updates to the fee program, having one firm keeping track of all of the constructed and reimbursed facilities will stream-line the process for the District.

Harris has been involved in the annexation fee process and understands the factors driving the four month deadline. Harris is committed to working with the District and the Developers to streamline the cost certification process and meet these deadlines. Harris is used to working under tight deadlines for this type of work and we have a team of individuals who are available to begin review of the documents immediately.

Scope of WorkHarris has developed the scope of work based on our extensive experience performing similar tasks for agencies throughout California and Nevada. The Cost Certification will be done in such a way that all information will be clearly summarized and documented for future review. In addition, the relationship to the applicable program eligibility will be closely documented. Harris will maintain a tracking spreadsheet to assist in future updates of the fee program and for inclusion into the District’s cost reimbursement tracking spreadsheets.

TASK 1 – PROJECT ORIENTATION MEETING

Harris will meet with District staff to confirm the scope of work and refine the project schedule. Project objectives will be outlined and the certification process will be discussed in an effort to streamline the process.

Harris will review the project binders with District staff to discuss information about eligibility of cost items that can be applied to projects. Harris will also determine if the developer generally submitted the required information which includes:

• Invoices• Canceled Checks• Unconditional Lien Releases• Contracts• Change Orders• As-Builts

Based on the initial review, if the developer did not submit all of the categories of information listed above, Harris will prepare an Additional Information Request (AIR) and send to District staff to forward to the developers. This letter will summarize the additional information that will be required to begin a review of the project binder.

Within two weeks of the project orientation meeting, Harris will prepare a summary of the cost certification process, a letter requesting additional information from each developer, and a detailed schedule.



TASK 2 –INITIAL COST REVIEW

Harris will review and summarize in an excel document all invoices, canceled checks, unconditional lien releases, contracts, and change orders to establish that all documen-tation has been received. This will facilitate segregating the costs into eligible and non-eligible costs as well as determining missing information. If information is missing, Harris will prepare an additional information request, requesting missing documentation. If no information is missing, Harris will move to Task 3.

TASK 3- ELIGIBILITY AND FIELD REVIEW

Eligibility Review. Once all information has been received, Harris will review the costs submitted for reimbursement against the contract and change order items and amounts to establish that no undocumented or ineligible costs were included in the request. Harris will also review the as-builts to compare against the submitted documents to determine the applicability. Eligible costs will be compared to the costs allowed in the CFF or TIF document, if applicable, to determine the maximum reimbursable cost.

Field Review. Harris staff will conduct field reviews to verify that the work being requested for reimbursement and shown on the plans has been constructed. Harris will also utilize historical Google Maps to assist in verifying that the project was completed by the requesting developer. Since much of this infrastructure was completed in the past, online maps may provide history that a field review cannot.

Technical Memorandum. Harris will draft a technical memorandum detailing any items that have been deemed ineligible for reimbursement, a summary of the verified amount, and a summary of any incomplete project components. This memo will be submitted to the District for review and Harris will hold a follow-up call to discuss if needed. Harris will finalize the Technical Memorandum and submit the final memo to District for distribution to the developer.

The developer will have an agreed upon amount of time to respond to this request with additional information that modifies the recommended amounts. A call can be held during this time to discuss if requested. If additional information is provided, Harris will incorporate that information into the cost certification process as necessary and begin on the Cost Certification Audit Report.

TASK 4 – PREPARE A COST CERTIFICATION AUDIT REPORT

Draft Cost Certification Audit Report. Harris will prepare a draft Cost Certification Audit Report that includes the following items:

• An executive summary• A summary of costs to be reimbursed and the applicable

program under which the reimbursement is authorized.• A description of the improvement being reimbursed

including location.• Project location map showing project limits • A summary of hard and soft costs • Item-by-item discussion of all disallowed costs.• A contract summary outlining the original price and

change orders (if any).• A summary of invoices, checks, and lien releases sepa-

rated by contract.• A discussion and summary of CFF/TIF eligibility, if

applicable.• Verification that each requested project has been

constructed.• A discussion regarding any incomplete portion.• A summary of correspondence related to the cost

certification

Harris will participate in a call with District staff if needed to review the draft audit report and answer any questions.

Final Cost Certification Audit Report. Harris will submit copies of the Final Cost Certification Report incorporating any revisions from the draft audit report to the District for each project.

TASK 5 – PROJECT MEETINGS

Harris will attend bi-weekly meetings with District staff to provide status updates, report on the findings of reimburse-ment eligibility for the projects under the CFF and TIF. Harris will maintain a status sheet noting the status of each binder, any items needing resolution, and an action item list.

In addition, Harris will attend either a call or meeting with the developer for each binder if determined necessary.

TASK 6 – PROJECT TRACKING SPREADSHEET

Harris will maintain an excel spreadsheet that summarizes the reimbursements being processed including location, amount, date, and governing program. For the TIF projects, Harris will also track on the detailed project cost spread-sheets, the items being reimbursed under each submittal. This will provide needed information to the District to be used in future fee updates as well as in reimbursement/credit tracking.



EXPECTATIONS OF DISTRICT STAFF

During the project orientation meeting, Harris will gather all binders and plans from the District’s office and transport to Harris’ office. If the CSD has plans or other documents that can be provided, Harris will work on-site with the District to obtain these, or Harris suggests as a means of eliminating staff and consultant time, we can request them directly from the developers as part of the Initial Additional Information Request.

District staff will be called upon to review each submittal prior to release to the development community. Harris can coordinate directly with delivery of the documents to the developer if desired, though the RFP stated that the District would handle this.

District staff will be asked to attend the biweekly meetings where Harris will provide a status report and discuss any decisions that need to be made. Harris knows that District staff are busy and have limited capacity to help with this project and will work to minimize your time involvement while keeping you informed of the status and key decisions.



PROPOSED TIMELINE FOR EACH COST CERTIFICATION AUDIT AND OVERALL TIMELINE

The following flow chart shows the proposed process to complete each cost certification binder. Due to the turnaround time from District Review and Developer review we anticipate the timeline for each to be 6 weeks. In order to meet the 4 month deadlines, this means that multiple projects will be in process at the same time and the process will overlap. We will need to set turnaround timelines for both District Staff and Developers to meet this timeline and those will be discussed and finalized at the project orientation meeting. There is also an opportunity to eliminate the technical memorandum stage and combine that with the either the initial cost review of the Cost Certification Audit report phase would could save additional time.

Developer Provides Additional

Information

Developer provides additional

information as requested in the AIR

Initial Cost Review

Harris reviews and summarizes all invoices, checks, line releases, contracts and change orders to

determine completeness of information.

Additional Information Request

(AIR)If Information is missing,

Harris will prepare an additional information

request, requesting missing documentation.

Eligibility and Field Review

Harris will review the costs for eligibility

against the contract, CFF/TIF documents (if applicable) and

as-builts. Field review will be conducted to ensure the requested

items are complete and constructed in

accordance with the plans

Technical Memorandum

Harris will draft a technical

memorandum detailing any items

that have been deemed ineligible

for certification, a summary of the

verified amount, and a summary of any

incomplete project components.

Developer Provides

Additional Information

Developer provides

additional information (if available)

District reviews and forwards to

Developers

Week 4(1 Week Duration)

Weeks 1-3(3 Week Duration)

Draft Cost Certification Audit

Report

Harris will prepare a draft Cost Certification

Audit Report that summarizes the

certified amount, a discussion of all

eligible and disallowed costs and documents

the program under which the facilities are

being certified.

Final Audit Report

Harris submits copies of the

Final Cost Certification Report

incorporating any revisions to the District and the

Developer

District reviews and forwards to

Developers

Weeks 5-6(2 Week Duration)



PLANNED NUMBER OF HOURS ON THE ENGAGEMENT FOR EACH LEVEL OF AUDITING STAFF

The following table summarizes the hours of engagement for each level of staff:

TYPE AND EXTENT OF USE OF SOFTWARE

Harris will utilize excel spreadsheet to prepare the audit reports and prepare tracking spreadsheets. We find that this works well and provides ease of use for District staff as well.

TYPE AND EXTENT OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Harris will review all contracts, change orders, invoices, canceled checks, and lien releases, to establish the eligible costs for reimbursement and perform an analysis to tie the documents together. Eligible costs will be reviewed against the contract and change order items to ensure that no undocumented costs were included in the reimbursement requests. Invoices, lien releases, and proof of payment will be reviewed to confirm that all work has been paid in full. Plans and contract quantities will be compared to ensure that only the eligible improvements are included in the reimbursement request and a field review of the requested improvement will be conducted to certify that the improvement was built according to the plans and that there are not incomplete items.

October November December January

TaskProject Hours

Project Hours as a Percent of Total Staff

TimeProject Hours


TimeProject Hours

Project Hours as a Percent of Total

Staff TimeProject Hours


Time

Project Director 31 17% 21 13% 21 13% 21 12%Project Manager 44 24% 34 21% 34 21% 35 20%Audit Oversight 36 20% 26 16% 26 16% 27 15%Lead Audit Engineer 86 47% 60 38% 53 33% 49 28%Project Engineer 96 52% 89 56% 89 56% 80 45%Senior Analysts (2 Staff Members) 116 32% 116 36% 116 36% 116 33%

Analysts (3 Staff Members) 154 28% 154 32% 154 32% 154 29%Lead Engineer 13 7% 11 7% 11 7% 10 6%Inspectors (2 Staff Members) 35 10% 35 11% 35 11% 33 6%

Total 611 24% 546 21% 539 21% 525 20%


Harris & Associates, Inc. 7. Identification of Anticipated Potential Construction and Related Cost Audit Problems 16

7. IDENTIFICATION OF ANTICIPATED POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED COST AUDIT PROBLEMS

KEY CHALLENGESBased upon the experience of the Harris team in reviewing $981 million of public infrastructure construction expenses for reimbursement, we have outlined how we will draw upon our experience and expertise to respond to the challenges frequently seen on these projects.

SERVE AS A RESOURCE TO THE DISTRICT IN THE REVIEW AND INTERPRETATION OF THE OVERARCHING AGREEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS

Challenge: The ability to review, interpret, and apply the requirements of the MARA, PRAs, PAAs, CFF, TIF, and other documents, will be key in determining the eligibility of costs for reimbursement.

Approach: Harris’ team will draw upon over 19 years of experience and knowledge providing review of reimbursement requests for the acquisition of public improvements through the payment of public funds to private parties. Alison Bouley and Joel Nagamine have been working with the District for the last two years and are familiar with the agreements. We will assist the District in the interpretation and implementation of the agreements based upon our team’s experience and in-depth knowledge.

Proven Success: Our team has successfully interpreted and applied the requirements of acquisition agreements and other governing documents to recommend the payment of $981 million submitted for reimbursement on similar projects. We understand that the submittal and review of payment requests must be based upon the project-specific documents, as well as governing laws. We are familiar with Mountain House’s governing documents and understand how these cost certifications fit into the big picture. Our documentation will compare the submitted costs to the CFF and TIF, if appli-cable, and will also track the specific line items and location of the projects being reimbursed. Our team has successfully completed the review of more than 600 reimbursement submittals based upon the specific requirements of each project’s acquisition agreement and applicable laws. Harris’ recommended reimbursements have never been disputed by the funding authority or the developer.

DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMLINED REVIEW PROCESSES AND ADAPTABILITY TO CHALLENGES

Challenge: The ability to meet the four month timeline will require the development of streamlined processes for the review and verification of project costs and strict adherence to timelines. In addition, due to lag between the construction of many of these projects and the submittal of the documentation, we understand that some of the documentation may be missing or take time to produce.

Approach: While the District has proposed an approach for review and certification of the costs, we have drawn on our extensive past experience from similar projects, and have suggested opportunities to streamline the process. This includes completing an initial review of the binders within two weeks and requesting general categories of information that are missing, for example the MHI binders contained only invoices and checks and is not adequate to complete this process. Should information be unavailable, Harris will meet with District staff immediately upon notification by the developer and discuss potential acceptable approaches and solutions.

Harris’ team is committed to doing our part to meet the four month certification deadline. We will draw upon a team of experienced staff who are available for this project. Alison Bouley and Joel Nagamine have been working on the CFF, TIF and Annexation Fee programs for the last two years and are familiar with the overarching documents. This means that there is “no learning curve,” which reduces the time and costs for the review of reimbursement requests. In addition, we have construction management staff on site that we can draw upon to ask construction related questions and will utilize our pavement management staff located in Concord who are familiar with Mountain House to provide field review.


Harris & Associates, Inc. 7. Identification of Anticipated Potential Construction and Related Cost Audit Problems 17

Proven Success: Harris has demonstrated our ability to work in partnership with public agencies and developers under tight timelines for the review of reimbursement requests. Members of our project team have worked with the City of San Francisco on the review and approval of over $479 million in infrastructure improvements. Our team has been to able to complete our review of reimbursement requests within a 30-day period from the receipt of each submittal.

Harris will work with the District to develop processes that will minimize delays in the processing of cost certification. Our scope of work reflects these suggested changes.

CLARITY OF REIMBURSEMENT DETERMINATIONS

Challenge: Determining the eligibility for reimbursement on projects can sometimes be unclear, especially when the work was not clearly identified in the contract documents and invoices or when construction took place years in the past.

Approach: The project team’s ability to understand the work being done is often key to determining the eligibility of expenses for reimbursement. Harris will be able to call upon experienced engineers and on-site construction managers who are familiar with Mountain House to field review the improvements. Harris understands the importance of providing accurate and well documented cost certifications that are consistent with the governing documents.

Proven Success: Alison and Joel’s experience with the TIF and CFF program will allow them to accurately determine the eligibility of cost certification requests. They have recently been involved in updating the CFF and TIF program and have a deep understanding of the various governing documents and understands the importance of proper documenta-tion. She has developed a close working relationship with District staff and will capitalize on this relationship to complete this important project.


Harris & Associates, Inc. 8. References, 9 Additional Information Required, and 10 Delegation or Subcontract Responsibilities 18

8. REFERENCES

MISSION BAY & HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD REDEVELOPMENT ACQUISITION AUDITS CITY/COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Barbara Moy Manager, Infrastructure Task Force 415.558.4050 [email protected] Year Completed: Ongoing

HENDERSON LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS (LID) CITY OF HENDERSON (NV) Lance Olson, PE Project Engineer 702.267.3063 [email protected] Year Completed: Ongoing

NORTH NATOMAS MIXED-USE MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY CITY OF SACRAMENTO Sheri Smith Special Districts Manager 916.808.7204 [email protected] Year Completed: Ongoing

TRACY HILLS REIMBURSEMENT AUDIT SERVICES CITY OF TRACY Andrew Malik Development and Engineering Services Director 209.831.6423 [email protected] Year Completed: Ongoing

9. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED

Harris does not need any additional information in order to accept this engagement. Our Project Director, Alison Bouley, been engaged on the TIF and CFF update with the District for 2 years and is familiar with the cost certification process as well as the various agreements.

10. DELEGATION OR SUBCONTRACT RESPONSIBILITIES

Harris does not require subcontractors to complete this work. Harris will not delegate or subcontract its responsibilities without prior written consent of the District.


Cost Proposal Harris and Associates has prepared a not to exceed fee for the scope of work contained in this proposal.

The following tables summarizes the not to exceed fee by Developer broken down by binder. These

hours are based on our past history with similar work and the typical level of effort required. Should it

be determined that the review will be more difficult than normal, Harris will discuss this with the City in

advance of the work being performed.

Project Name CFF/TIF/Utility

Current

Developer Reimb.

Request

Total Harris

Fee

MHI Projects

Kick‐off Meeting $ 4,985

Backbone Infrastructure TIF/Util ity $ 311,166.36 $ 6,060

Central Parkway TIF $ 4,598,373.13 $ 18,960

Community Park CFF $ 80,718.53 $ 4,860

De Anza Boulevard TIF $ 1,579,190.07 $ 11,360

Drainage A Util ity $ 878,815.08 $ 7,860

Drainage B Util ity $ 668,451.34 $ 6,760

Drainage ‐ Clean Util ity $ 2,331,714.98 $ 12,960

Grant Line Road TIF $ 2,615,336.34 $ 13,960

Joint Trench ‐ Central Parkway (SPII & SPIII) TIF/Util ity $ 168,481.70 $ 5,260

Joint Trench ‐ De Anza Boulevard TIF/Util ity $ 546,456.64 $ 7,160

Joint Trench ‐ Grant Line Road TIF/Util ity $ 1,058,206.10 $ 8,760

Mountain House Parkway Widening TIF $ 989,662.27 $ 8,360

Processing and Planning (Project approvals) TIF/CFF/Util ity $ 7,790,104.58 $ 5,960

Sewer ‐ Central Parkway Util ity $ 541,160.04 $ 7,160

Sewer (De Anza Blvd. North of Grant Line Road, Grant Line

Road, Central to Alameda County) Util ity $ 450,706.11 $ 6,760

Sewer Truck Line Util ity $ 383,844.33 $ 6,360

Util ity Corridor Landscaping Util ity $ 28,709.27 $ 4,560

Water ‐ Central Parkway Util ity $ 1,096,782.50 $ 8,960

Water ‐ De Anza Boulevard Util ity $ 617,250.97 $ 7,560

Water Grant Line Road Util ity $ 51,072.67 $ 4,760

Water Quality Basin Util ity $ 393,219.06 $ 6,460

Subtotal MHI $ 27,179,422.07 $ 175,845

MHD Projects

Kick‐off Meeting $ 4,985

Central Parkway (Mustang to Grant Line) #1 TIF/Util ity $ 3,148,620.00 $ 7,960

Great Valley Parkway (Mustang to Grant Line) TIF/Util ity $ 5,600,000.00 $ 20,960

Byron Road (GVP to MHP) TIF/Util ity $ 4,800,000.00 $ 18,960

Great Valley Parkway (DeAnza to Byron) TIF/Util ity $ 4,900,000.00 $ 18,960

Central Parkway Overcrossing TIF/Util ity $ 5,000,000.00 $ 18,960

Mustang (GVP to Central) TIF $ 1,700,000.00 $ 11,960

Mustang (Central to DeAnza) TIF $ 1,800,000.00 $ 12,460

Traffic Signal (Mustang and Central) TIF $ 300,000.00 $ 5,960

Central Parkway (DeAnza to Byron) TIF $ 500,000.00 $ 6,960

DeAnza (GVP to Central) TIF $ 400,000.00 $ 6,460

Grant Line Road (GVP to Central) TIF 600,000.00$ 7,460$

Grant Line Road (Central to Prosperity) TIF 400,000.00$ 6,460$

Traffic Signal (Great Valley and Kelso Road) TIF 200,000.00$ 5,460$

Traffic Signal (Great Valley and Byron) TIF 200,000.00$ 5,460$

Subtotal MHD 29,548,620.00$ 159,425$

Total For All Projects 335,270$


The following table summarizes the billing rates for proposed staff.

Note: The cost proposal includes all direct costs such as travel, equipment, computer, communications

and reproduction. These rates are valid through December 31, 2019 and are subject to a CPI escalation

each year thereafter.

Should additional services be needed from Harris, we will prepare a scope and fee for the required work

utilizing the hourly rates shown in this proposal.

Position Rate

Project Director 250$

Project Manager 230$

Audit Oversight 165$

Lead Audit Engineer 165$

Project Engineer 150$

Senior Analyst 170$

Analyst 140$

Lead Engineer ‐ Field Review 185$

Project Engineer ‐ Field Review 120$

Summary of Billing Rates


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes I

Lynne Filson, PE, RLSPROJECT MANAGER

Lynne has over 25 years of Civil and Traffic Engineering experience in both the public and private sectors. On the public side, she has been the Assistant City Engineer overseeing the Capital Improvement, Development Engineering, Traffic Engineering, Clean Water, and Inspection sections. While working in the private sector, Lynne prepared Tentative Maps, Final Maps, and Subdivision Improvement Plans for many Bay Area and Central Valley projects including multiple phases of Trilogy in Rio Vista, Discovery Bay West, and Mountain House. She was a discipline leader for the Municipal Roadway group leading teams designing roundabouts, bikeways, traffic signals, and utility projects.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• Shea Homes, Mountain House. Traffic Engineer/Civil Engineer. After approval of the conceptual layout of the project and determination of the needed infrastructure, the next step was the design of the community. Lynne was actively involved in this step of the project. Lynne prepared or reviewed all of the traffic engineering design for many of the phases of the Mountain House development. The plans included signing and striping, traffic signals, and lighting. She also prepared timing cards for the traffic signals and provided signal turn-on support. She also assisted on Tentative and Final maps, improvement plans, and estimates.

• City of Antioch, Various Projects. Assistant Engineer. Responsible for all aspects of Public Works Engineering for a City with a population of over 110,000. Lynne oversaw the activities of Capital Improvements, Development Engineering, Encroachment Permits, Traffic Engineering, Clean Water, and Public Works Inspection. She prepared plans, specs and estimates for capital improvement projects, and review those of her subordinates. She wrote the Conditions of Approval for the development projects that were approved during her tenure and negotiated Development Agreements. She was instrumental in the creation of two Community Facilities Districts (CFC's): one for ongoing police services and one for landscape maintenance. She provided all traffic engineering services including traffic signal timing, provided signing and striping direction to the maintenance crews, and handled citizen complaints.

• City of Dixon, Staff Augmentation. Contract Engineer. With a vacancy in the Engineering Section of Public Works, the City was in need of assistance until the position could be filled. The City contracted with Harris and Associates to provide staff augmentation until the position could be filled. Lynne brought her years of City Engineering experience to Dixon to assist with the backlog of projects. She began by doing the final plan check on a municipal parking lot project so it could go out to bid in a timely manner. She next reviewed the City's Streets Master Plan and provided insight into their traffic projection assumptions and capacity expecta-tions. In-between major projects, she prepared staff reports to the City Council and became staff to the Transportation Advisory Commission, preparing agendas, staff, reports, and making presentations.

EDUCATIONBS, Civil Engineering

REGISTRATIONSProfessional Engineer, CA

LICENSESProfessional Land Surveyor, CAProfessional Traffic Engineer, CAProfessional Civil Engineer, CA

APPENDIX: RESUMES


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes II

Alison Bouley, PEPROJECT DIRECTOR

Alison has 19 years of experience in providing financial engineering services to cities, counties, and special districts on a wide variety of project types, including reimbursement audits for large-scale development projects. Alison has conducted reimbursement audits for over $120 million in public infrastructure construction throughout California. She has also managed large scale development projects where she has been responsible for coordinating with a variety of players, tracking outstanding item lists, and reaching consensus amongst team members. Alison has been working with the Mountain House CSD for the last two years updating their CFF, TIF and Annexation fee program and understands the various guiding documents and agreements in place.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• Mountain House Community Services District, Community Facilities Fee (CFF) Update, Transportation Improvement Fee (TIF) Update and Annexation Fee Development. Project Manager. Harris has been working with the Mountain House CSD to prepare an update to the CFF and TIF development impact fees. The CFF fees fund parks, public buildings and public safety facilities and the TIF fee funds roads and intersections. In addition, Harris is calculating an annexation fee for reimbursement to the Master Developers by all annexing policies. Alison served as the project manager for this project and worked closely with the District and their legal counsel on the update. She is familiar with the governing documents in Mountain House including but not limited to the Master Acquisition and Reimbursement Agreements, the Project Acquisition Agreements, the Project Reimbursement Agreements, the CFF and TIF documents, the annexation fee ordinance, the Public Financing Plan, and the Utility Pledged Revenue Component. Alison has assisted the City in updating their tracking spreadsheets and will be assisting them in developing policies and procedures moving forward.

• City and County of San Francisco, Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 1 Development, Community Facilities District No. 7. Project Manager. Harris provided facility reimbursement/acquisition audit services for the City and County of San Francisco, who is working with a developer to redevelop the site. The reimbursement of costs for public facilities was funded by $34 million in Mello-Roos CFD bonds. Alison reviewed and approved over $23 million in reimbursement requests. Harris committed to a 10-day turnaround on reimbursement audits and, therefore, our team must be available to cover the requests at all times to meet this short turn-around. Alison was able to meet the project deadline for all submittals. In addition, she set up tracking systems and guidelines for the project to implement a smooth transfer of information.

• City of Sacramento, Acquisition Audits. Project Manager. Alison was responsible for overseeing the team during the review and approval of reimbursement of over $52 million in public infrastructure funded through multiple CFDs and fee programs. Reimbursement requests have included a wide variety of public infra-structure including roadways, signals, bridges, utilities, parks, and bikeways.

EDUCATIONBS, Engineering ManagementBS, Civil Engineering


AFFILIATIONSAmerican Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE)California Society ofMunicipal Finance Officers(CSMFO)Municipal ManagersAssociation of SouthernCalifornia (MMASC)Growth and Infrastructure Consortium (GIC) Board Secretary

Are You Reimbursing Developers for Construction of Public Infrastructure?

By Alison Bouley, PE

Visit this article here: http://www.weareharris.com/ideas/whitepapers/are-you-reimbursing-developers-for-construction-of-public-in-frastructure


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes III

Ben Caragan, CPA, MBAAUDIT OVERSIGHT

Ben is an experienced public finance consultant with 17 years of experience special-izing in financial and budgetary analysis and works with public agencies that include cities and water districts. Ben's areas of expertise include cost-of-service analysis, budgetary preparation, financial statement analysis, financial reporting, preparation of proforma financial statements, water and sewer rate studies, development impact fee studies, and management accounting and auditing. He has also prepared financial performance audits using analytical procedure components of the Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS) framework as a guideline. In the past three years, Ben has accumulated more than 150 Continuing Professional Education units related to accounting and auditing. Lastly, he has also served as the financial advisor to various public agencies in the funding of capital improvements, which included private placements and bond issues in multiple series.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• Castaic Lake Water Agency and Newhall County Water District, Financial Performance Audit. Project Manager. Ben prepared the financial performance review component of the merger of these two water districts.

• County of Orange Facilities Operations Division and Resources and Development Management Department (FACOPS-RDMD), Financial and Administrative Operations Audit. Project Analyst. Reviewed and evaluated internal charge rates, internal billing procedures and other financial practices of the department. Identified level of services and recommended actions to resolve deficiencies in billing operations.

• Pico Water District, Financial Performance Audit. Project Manager. Project required the review of audited financial statements and the budget to determine the financial standing of the District. It also involved the analytical review of future revenues and expenses, using water use data and planned capital improvement projects.

• City of Grand Terrace, Affordable Housing Compliance Review Audit. Project Manager. Prepared quarterly eligibility audit and compliance reports related to affordable housing and reported findings to the City.

• Institute for Integrative Genome Biology of the University of California, Financial and Operational Audit. Project Manager. Evaluated the Institute’s value chain to explore competencies, developed financial proformas and established internal and external services rates for its laboratory services. Prepared the business plan and reported findings to the Dean and management staff.

EDUCATIONMBA, Finance and AccountingBS, Molecular Biology

REGISTRATIONSCertified Public Accountant, CA

AFFILIATIONSCalifornia Society of Certified Public AccountantsAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes IV

Anna Tan-Gatue, PELEAD AUDIT ENGINEER

Anna is a Project Engineer with over 14 years of experience in providing public finance services to cities, counties, and special districts on a wide variety of project types. She is an expert in the field of facilities acquisition, having conducted construc-tion audits of public improvements valued over $570 million throughout California and Nevada. Tasks have included review and interpretation of acquisition agreements, change order review, and reimbursement analyses and audits for recommendation of purchase prices for facilities.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• City and County of San Francisco, Mission Bay Development, Community Facilities District Nos. 4 and 6. Deputy Project Manager. Anna is responsible for providing quality control for the auditing process, which includes developing audit procedures and guidelines and staff training. She is also responsible for main-taining a status report/schedule of all the acquisition projects and facilities, and where they are in the reimbursement process and delivering a weekly status to the City and Developer. Anna performs the detailed cost/reimbursement analyses for each facility submitted by the developer, reviews of the allocation of costs between public and private facilities, and prepares the Reimbursement Audit Reports recommending the appropriate reimbursement amounts to the City. To date, Anna has reviewed and recommended over $456 million in reimbursements.

• City and County of San Francisco, Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 1 Development, Community Facilities District No. 7. Deputy Project Manager. Anna was respon-sible for providing quality control for the Hunters Point Shipyard auditing process, which included developing audit procedures and guidelines to assist the City and developer with the audit and reimbursement process. She was also responsible for performing the detailed cost audits of invoices and proofs of payment, performing the cost / reimbursement analyses for each reimbursement request submitted by the developer, and preparing the Reimbursement Audit Reports recommending the appropriate reimbursement amounts to the City. To date, Anna has reviewed and recommended over $23 million in reimbursements.

• City of Henderson, Local Improvement District T-18 Inspirada. Project Manager. Anna is responsible for providing acquisition audit services within the T-18 devel-opment area. She is responsible for performing the cost/reimbursement analyses and preparing the Reimbursement Audit Reports recommending the appropriate reimbursement amounts to the City. She also reviewed developer project costs, improvement plans, and proposed land use modifications to determine benefits to the properties within the district and assisted with the development of the assess-ment methodology. To date, Anna has reviewed and recommended $27.5 million in reimbursements.

• Monterey County, East Garrison Acquisition Audit. Project Engineer. Anna was responsible for preparing the acquisition audit for the reimbursement of $8.3 million in facilities and fees. This project was challenging as the developer had acquired the property through a trustee sale and available documentation was limited. Anna worked closely with the developer under a tight timeline to review the documentation and prepare the audit report.

EDUCATIONBS, Industrial & SystemsEngineering



Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes V

Joel Nagamine, EITPROJECT ENGINEER

Joel is a civil engineer proficient in AutoCAD Civil 3D 2013, Bluebeam Revu, and Microsoft Office Suite. He has been assisting on data entry and cost validation on a variety of acquisition audits including Mission Bay, Henderson, and Sacramento. He is well versed in reviewing bid documents, change orders, invoices and proof of payment. Joel also served as the project engineer on the update of the CFF, TIF and Annexation fee for Mountain House and is familiar with the governing documents in Mountain House.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• City and County of San Francisco, Mission Bay Development Acquisition Audits. Project Engineer. Project entails providing quality control for the auditing process by developing audit procedures, reviewing bid documents, contracts, and change orders, reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, conducting cost / reimbursement analysis of the public infrastructure, maintaining project records, and preparing Reimbursement Audit Reports recommending appropriate reimbursements amounts. To date, over $428.3 million in reimbursement requests for Mission Bay have been reviewed and approved for public infrastructure construction (roadways, wet and dry utilities, parks), design, environmental mitigation, and demolition. Joel was responsible for assisting in the reviewing of bid documents and change orders, reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, performing the cost/reimbursement analyses and preparation of the report.

• City of Henderson, Nevada, Local Improvement District No. T-18 (Inspirada). Project Engineer. Project consists of reviewing contracts and change orders, reviewing invoices and proof of payment submitted by the developer, conducting cost/reimbursement analyses of the public improvements, field review of the facilities, and preparing Reimbursement Audit Reports recommending appropriate reimbursement amounts. To date, over $27.1 million in reimbursement requests have been reviewed and approved. Joel was responsible for assisting in the audit of construction costs for the Local Improvement District (LID) T-18 (Inspirada) public improvements. This included the review of contracts and change orders, and reviewing invoices, proofs of payment, and all documents submitted by the developer.

• City of Sacramento, North Natomas Development Area. Project Engineer. Project included the review of the developer reimbursement request for eligible facilities, detailed review of contracts, change order, invoices and proofs of payments submitted by the developer, allocation of costs between public and private facilities, recommen-dation of reimbursement amount and completion of Acquisition Audit report, update of project costs covered under the impact fee program for use in update of the impact fees. Joel was responsible for assisting the cost/reimbursement analyses for reim-bursement requests submitted by the developer and recommending the appropriate reimbursement amount.

• Mountain House, Annexation Fee, Community Facilities Fee, and Transportation Improvement Fee. Project Engineer. Joel was responsible for the update of the CFF and TIF impact fees. This included updating project costs and other assumptions and preparing the updated Nexus Studies. Joel also worked on the Annexation Fee which included preliminarily reviewing the costs submitted by Mountain House Investors and Mountain House Developer's to determine the cost eligibility by category.

EDUCATIONBS, Civil Engineering

REGISTRATIONSEngineer-in-Training, HI


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes VI

Nick KralSENIOR ANALYST

Nick has 10 years of experience providing support to cities, counties, and developers on public finance, special districts, and AB1600 impact fees. Prior to joining Harris, he worked with private developers, providing needed financial support, due diligence and long term planning. He is skilled in special district formation, bond financing, development impact fees, and project due diligence. Nick is a problem solver who will work with stakeholders and clients to facilitate solutions acceptable to all parties. He is able to problem solve and lead project stakeholders to a satisfactory result for all.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• City of Oxnard, Development Impact Fee Update. Senior Project Analyst. The City requested a fee update for the Traffic Impact Fee, Water and Wastewater Connection Fee, Growth Requirement Fee, and Parks and Recreation Fee. Harris will assist with use of current impact fee fund balance use, collection of all planned CIP projects, and allocation of costs across remaining planned development. Nick was responsible as being the primary City contact, coordinating with several different departments to create infrastructure development plans and associated costs. He was responsible for organizing and writing reports for presentation at City Council meetings.

• City of Elk Grove, Impact Fee Peer Review for a Private Developer. Project Manager. The City updated the City Facilities Fee (CFF). Nick was retained by the Client to create a fee review to present to City hall. This update increased fees by around $4,000 per single family residence. A complete study of all fee components was completed and compared to similar Cities in California to show how the City was not properly establishing a nexus between need for facilities and demand created by new housing.

• Placer County, Service Area Formation and Update. Project Manager. Placer County collects fees for sewer, parks, roads, and drainage via County Service Areas (CSAs). A new housing development was being planned and new CSAs were formed for the maintenance and operation expenses of the to-be installed infrastructure. Nick created the cost and allocation tables and wrote major pieces of the four engineer’s reports.

• Sacramento County, Public Facilities Financing Plan and Urban Services Plan for a Development. Project Manager. Sacramento County requires all new major developments to create a Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) to outline all financial information for a development. These reports include backbone construction cost, maintenance and operation expenses, building permit and impact fee costs, projected Community Facilities District (CFD) infrastructure bond proceeds, any County funding shortfalls for maintenance, a maintenance CFD, and a total tax burden. Nick completed this task including the associated report for presentation to County Planning.

• Placer County, Public Facilities Financing Plan and Urban Services Plan. Project Manager. Placer County requires all new major developments to create a Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) to outline all financial information for a develop-ment. These reports include backbone construction cost, maintenance and operation expenses, building permit and impact fee costs, projected Community Facilities District (CFD) infrastructure bond proceeds, any County funding shortfalls for maintenance, a maintenance CFD, and a total tax burden. Nick completed this task including the associated report for presentation to County Planning. Placer County also requires an Urban Services Plan to be completed. The Urban Services Plan outlines the process and plans for delivery of utilities to the project, specifically water, sewer, drainage, electrical, and trash collection.

EDUCATIONMBA, FinanceBS, Accounting


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes VII

Tim NguyenSENIOR ANALYST

Tim has 15 years of experience in real estate and urban planning in both private and public sectors, including cities of San Diego and Irvine, both renowned for their innovative approach to funding infrastructure. Previously, Tim worked on land enti-tlements for a Top 10 national homebuilder focusing his work in the Inland Empire, among the fastest growing regions in California. Prior to joining Harris, Tim was with a publicly-traded real estate development firm where he managed land acquisi-tion and community planning efforts and conducted market & financial feasibility for about 100 communities. He is a member of Builder Industry Association San Diego and Southern California and Urban Land Institute.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• City of Coronado, Storm Drain System Enterprise Fund. Project Manager. Develop a business plan to finance infrastructure and on-going maintenance for the City’s Storm Drain system. Tim is responsible for analyzing all costs and storm drain infrastructure needs, identifying potential revenue sources, preparing report and presenting to City Council for adoption.

• City of Oxnard, 2018 Annual AB1600 Report. Project Manager. Prepare Development Impact Fee Annual Report in accordance with state law. Tim iden-tified public facilities, analyzed city budgets, and prepared report which would be presented at public hearing.

• City of Orinda, Parking In Lieu Fee Study. Project Manager. Conduct research and analysis, and recommend Parking In Lieu Fee developers would pay in to meet parking requirements for expanded or new development projects in the City’s downtown area. Harris Interviewed similar cities including Lafayette, Moraga, Walnut Creek, Concord, Danville, and Petaluma, and executives in the develop-ment community.

• City of Coronado, Utility Undergrounding Master Plan. Project Manager. Prepare a master plan that would prioritize areas, estimate costs, and identify funding mechanisms to finance the undergrounding of all overhead lines and related infra-structure in the City. Harris identified 28 miles of utility lines to be undergrounded at an estimated cost of $175 million; provided recommendation on funding sources to finance project. Tim prepared maps, coordinated with utility providers, met with City staff and prepared reports and presented to City Council for adoption.

EDUCATIONMBA, Real Estate FinanceBS, Urban Planning


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes VIII

Pat PerinichANALYST

Pat has over 20 years of experience in special tax consulting, assessment engineering and public finance. He has worked with 92 public agency clients in California. He has worked on a variety of public finance projects including Acquisition Audits, CFD Administration and Formation, 1972 Act Administration and Formation, 1982 Act Administration and Formation, 1915 Act Administration, Proposition 218 Balloting, Bond Refundings, Continuing Disclosure, Tax Increment Financing, Public Safety Special Taxes, and other Special Projects.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• City and County of San Francisco, Mission Bay Development Acquisition Audits. Project Analyst. Providing quality control for the auditing process by developing audit procedures, reviewing bid documents, contracts, and change orders, reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, conducting cost / reimbursement analysis of the public infrastructure, maintaining project records, and preparing Reimbursement Audit Reports recommending appropriate reimbursements amounts. To date, over $456 million in reimbursement requests for Mission Bay have been reviewed and approved for public infrastructure construc-tion (roadways, wet and dry utilities, parks), design, environmental mitigation, and demolition. With primary responsibilities assigned to others, Pat provides depth by assisting in the reviewing of bid documents and change orders, reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, performing the cost/reimbursement analyses and preparation of the reports for the City and County of San Francisco.

• City of Henderson, Local Improvement District Acquisition Audits. Project Analyst. Project consists of reviewing contracts and change orders, reviewing invoices and proof of payment submitted by the developer, conducting cost/reimbursement analyses of the public improvements, field review of the facilities, and preparing Reimbursement Audit Reports recommending appropriate reim-bursement amounts. Pat was responsible for assisting in the audit of construction costs for Local Improvement Districts (LID) T-12 (Lake Las Vegas North Shore), T-16 (Falls at Lake Las Vegas), and T-18 (Inspirada) public improvements. This included the review of contracts and change orders, and reviewing invoices, proofs of payment, and all documents submitted by the developer. Pat has reviewed and recommended approximately $2.1 million in reimbursements for the City of Henderson.

EDUCATIONMA, EducationBS, Business Administration Finance

CERTIFICATIOINSCalifornia Single Subject Teaching Credential, Business and Mathematics Authorizations


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes IX

Adam MarstonANALYST

Adam has conducted facility acquisition audits, construction audits and functional requirements at military installations worldwide encompassing functions ranging from utility systems to airfields. In addition, he has direct experience working as an integral part of a city’s Community Development Department. He is proficient at databases, spatial analysis, compiling construction costs, quality control, and confirming data accuracy.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• City and County of San Francisco, Mission Bay Development Acquisition Audits. Senior Analyst. Providing quality control for the auditing process by developing audit procedures, reviewing bid documents, contracts, and change orders, reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, conducting cost / reimbursement analysis of the public infrastructure, maintaining project records, and preparing Reimbursement Audit Reports recommending appropriate reimbursements amounts. To date, over $428.3 million in reimbursement requests for Mission Bay have been reviewed and approved for public infrastructure construction (roadways, wet and dry utilities, parks), design, environmental mitigation, and demolition. Adam was responsible for assisting in the reviewing of bid documents and change orders, reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, performing the cost/reimbursement analyses and preparation of the report.

• City of Henderson, Local Improvement District No. T-18 Inspirada Acquisition Audit. Senior Analyst. Reviewing contracts and change orders, reviewing invoices and proof of payment submitted by the developer, conducting cost/reimbursement analyses of the public improvements, field review of the facilities, and preparing Reimbursement Audit Reports recommending appropriate reimbursement amounts. To date, over $27.1 million in reimbursement requests have been reviewed and approved. Adam was responsible for assisting in the audit of construction costs for the Local Improvement District (LID) T-18 (Inspirada) public improvements. This included the review of contracts and change orders, and reviewing invoices, proofs of payment, and all documents submitted by the developer.

• City of Tracy, Tracy Hills Reimbursement Audit Services. Senior Analyst. Harris assisted the City in negotiating the acquisition agreement, reimbursement guide and development agreement for this 5,200 unit residential development. Adam coordinated with the developer and their team, City staff, and the City attorney to develop the agreements for this specific plan area. Harris will be providing reimbursement audit services once the bonds are sold. The bonds were recently sold and Harris is providing reimbursement audit services for this project.

• Clark County, Reimbursement Audit for SIDs No. 132, 151 and 159. Senior Analyst. Providing acquisition audit services to determine the purchase price for the public improvements built by the developer for multiple Special Improvement Districts. To date, over $37.17 million in reimbursement requests for Clark County SIDs have been reviewed and approved for public infrastructure construction (roadways, wet and dry utilities, parks), design, environmental mitigation, and demolition. Adam was responsible for assisting in the quality control of the acquisition audit by reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, performing the cost/reimbursement analyses and preparation of the final audit report.

EDUCATIONBS, City & Regional Planning

CERTIFICATIONSUS Green Building Council, LEED Green Associate

AFFILIATIONSGrowth and Infrastructure ConsortiumAmerican Planning Association (APA)


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes X

Diana ShengANALYST

Diana has 12 years of experience and has been responsible for all technical aspects of Public Financing Districts pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, and Mello-Roos Community Facility Districts. Diana also has extensive experience in the field of facilities acquisition, assisted construction audits of public improvements throughout California and Nevada. Project tasks include reviewing the bid documents and change orders, reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, performing the cost/reim-bursement analyses, and preparing the Facilities Acquisition Reports recommending reimbursement amounts for the improvements.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• City and County of San Francisco, Acquisition Audit Services. Project Analyst. Harris assists the City of San Francisco in the acquisition of completed public improvements in the Mission Bay area. The improvements include roadways, wet and dry utilities, parks and costs for design, environmental mitigation and freeway demolition. To date, Harris has recommended reimbursement of over $456 million through reimbursement requests. Diana's responsibilities on this project included reviewing bid documents and change orders, reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, performing the cost/reimbursement analyses, and preparing the Facilities Acquisition Reports recommending reimbursement amounts for the improvements.

• City & County of San Francisco, Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 1 Development. Project Analyst. Harris provided facility reimbursement/acquisition audit services for the City and County of San Francisco, who is working with a developer to rede-velop the site. The reimbursement of costs for public facilities was funded by $34 million in Mello-Roos CFD bonds. Diana's responsibilities on this project included reviewing bid documents and change orders, reviewing invoices and proofs of payment submitted by the developer, performing the cost/reimbursement analyses, and preparing the Facilities Acquisition Reports recommending reimbursement amounts for the improvements.

• City of Sacramento, McKinley Village Reimbursement Audit Services. Project Analyst. Harris will prepare a reimbursement audit for the Mckinley Village devel-opment for the reimbursement of $5.5 million in facilities. Diana's responsibilities on this project included entering and reviewing invoices, checks, contracts, and other pertinent documentation. As well and documenting missing documentation and helping determine an eligible reimbursement amount for the City to give to the developer.

• City of Henderson, T-18 Acquisition Audits. Project Analyst. Harris provided reimbursement/acquisition audit services for the City of Henderson for public improvements within the city. The improvements include roadways, wet and dry utilities. To date, Harris has recommended reimbursement of over $31 million through reimbursement requests. Diana's responsibilities on this project included entering and reviewing invoices, checks, contracts, and other pertinent documen-tation. As well and documenting missing documentation and helping determine an eligible reimbursement amount for the City to give to the developer.

EDUCATIONBA, Economics and Sociology


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes XI

Mike Duarte, PELEAD ENGINEER

Mike has 27 years of experience and has served as an engineer on numerous capital improvement projects, specializing in sewer and water pipeline work. He has expe-rience delivering multi-million dollar projects with Caltrans, as well as projects for public agencies including cities, counties, and water districts. A former engineer for Westlands Water District, Mike brings valuable expertise in surveying pipelines for line replacement, new line installation, routine maintenance and emergency repairs. His experience includes working with reinforced concrete and welded steel pipe up to 6 feet in diameter, as well as PVC and VCP Pipe. Mike has been trained to observe trenching and shoring and confined space protocols. Mike is currently working with Mountain House Community Services District providing on-call services. He understand s the Districts processes, meeting their goals in a timely manner.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• Mountain House Community Services District, Mountain House Community Services District On-Call Construction Inspection Services. Resident Engineer / Construction Inspector. Mike has daily interaction with the District, designers, contractors, inspectors, and authorities having jurisdiction on the project. Mike is responsible for the scheduling, coordinating and performing daily site inspections individually or with other inspectors, to ensure all civil improvements (water, sewer, storm pipelines, sidewalks, curb & gutters, driveways & sound walls, etc.) are in compliance with the approved plans, specifications and codes. He also prepares comprehensive and concise daily reports that reflect the day’s construction activities; coordinates 3rd-party special material testing inspec-tions on an as needed basis; maintains up-to-date project records, including as-built drawings, material testing reports, miscellaneous inspection and testing reports, item quantity files, and others; makes recommendations regarding the acceptability of contractor work according to approved plans and specifications; and reviews / approves / submits all invoices pertained to the contract on a monthly basis.

• County of San Mateo, Adeline Drive and Canyon Road Capacity Improvements. Construction Over-site Inspector. This $2 million project consisted of two major tasks: resurfacing/rehabilitation of streets and replacement, by pipe bursting and open trench method, of approximately 0.91 miles of existing asbestos cement pipe (ACP) and vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sanitary sewer mains with new polyvinylchloride (PVC) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes, depending on the method of construction.

• City of Mill Valley, 2016 Street, Storm Drain and Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation. Construction Inspector. This project comprises two major tasks: rehabilitation of sanitary sewers located below resurfaced streets and resurfacing/rehabilitation of streets. During the project, the surrounding community had to be communicated very effectively. To perform work on the City’s narrow and curving streets safely, the project team worked closely with the City to devise a plan for traffic control during the construction. This required that some of the roads be closed when the work was being performed, and that the community be notified often of the schedule and status of the project. Details to the community were given during town hall meeting, fliers and signs. Mike’s responsibilities were to provide construction inspection services of the grinding and pavement overlay (Hot Mix Asphalt) of approximately 1.5 miles of road. The biggest challenge to this project was keeping the residents informed and happy. Mike’s public relation abilities helped in the success of completing the work with minimal complaints and issues.

EDUCATIONBS, Civil EngineeringAS, Civil EngineeringAS, Building Trades Technology & Civil Engineering

REGISTRATIONSBuilding Trades Technology & Civil Engineering, CA


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes XII

Vijay Pulijal, PEPROJECT ENGINEER

Vijay's projects have included pavement condition surveying, signs inspections, legends and markings surveying, and condition assessments, budget analysis for maintenance and operations of asphalt pavement structures, and report generation. He has managed over 80 PMP projects and over 5,000 centerline miles, and has earned a reputation for his attention to detail and quality control. As one of MTC’s preferred consultants, he is actively involved with the StreetSaver® software development team and has been recently awarded as a ‘Power User’ by MTC. His prior experience was with MTC in Oakland, where he provided a variety of services related to the MTC software, including program beta testing, StreetSaver® software development, GIS applications, and PMP Users Meeting coordination. During Vijay’s 13 years as Harris’ Asset Management Group Leader, his team has not missed a single deadline.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• Mountain House Community Services District, 2012, 2013/2014, and 2014/2015 Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update. Project Manager. Mountain House, CA. Project included pavement condition inspection for the entire pave-ment network, calculating condition assessments according to MTCs Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Distress Identification Manual for each pavement segment, testing various budgets against pavement condition performance, and generating a final report summarizing our methodologies, recommendations and findings. Vijay’s responsibilities included setting up meetings with the assistant engineer, creating an inspection databases for the field crew, supervising staff, providing quality assurance, and preparing analyses and reports. He also stayed in regular contact with City staff to be certain the City?s needs were being met. Vijay also trained District staff in using and updating the database. At the District?s request, successfully presented results and recommendation to City Council.

• City of Chico, PMP Update. Project Manager. Network had not been inspected in over 10 years. Over 100 miles of pavement sections had to be added to the database. Took existing pavement management data in Cartagraph and imported it into StreetSaver®. Harris performed extensive new field surveys of the entire city—collecting current conditions data on 282 centerline miles—to update the StreetSaver® database and show where maintenance would be most effective.

• City of Piedmont, Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update and Certification. Project Manager. Harris performed pavement condition inspection for the entire pavement network of 44 centerline miles, updated the maintenance and rehabilitation budget since 2006, calculated a condition assessment according to MTC's Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Distress Identification Manual for each pavement segment, tested various budgets against pavement condition perfor-mance, and generated a final report summarizing our methodologies and findings. Harris' design engineers also prepared standard pavement design specifications for the City. Vijay’s responsibilities included setting up meetings with the City staff, creating inspection databases for the field crew, supervising staff, providing quality assurance, providing field & application training and preparing analyses and reports.

EDUCATIONMS, Engineering TechnologyBS, Civil Engineering

REGISTRATIONSProfessional Civil Engineer, CA

CERTIFICATIONSStreetSaver® Rater Certification Program

TRAININGPavement Distress Survey and StreetSaver® Database Training

AWARDSMTC Pavement Management Program Power User


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes XIII

Marissa BacligINSPECTOR

Marissa has ten years of experience specializing in pavement management systems, including StreetSaver® Version 9.0, public works inspection, and working with the public. While at Harris, Marissa has performed field pavement condition surveying, data entry, and budget analysis for more than 2,116 miles of streets. This included local roads and newly segmented streets for over 40 different public agencies. She also performs quality control and conducts training for clients and subconsultants on performing field inspections and using StreetSaver®. Marissa is actively involved in the current round of MTC P-TAP 16 projects for seven different public agencies.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• Mountain House Community Services District, 2012, 2013/2014, and 2014/2015 Pavement Management Program Update. Asset Management Technician. Conducted annual pavement inspections. Performed field surveys, data entry, budget analysis, and quality control. MTC StreetSaver® Online Version (9.0).

• Mountain House Community Services District, Pavement Management Program (PMP). Field Technician. Segmented Mountain House's entire pavement network to be added to the StreetSaver® database and conducted pavement condition survey of about 60 centerline miles. Harris generated an analysis that included five different budget scenarios and submitted a final report summarizing the results obtained.

• MTC, Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program (P-TAP) Rounds 9–18. Field Technician. Performed pavement condition surveys of 6,059 centerline miles; worked closely with MTC to develop their soft ware; and Performed StreetSaver® program training.

• County of Sonoma, Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update. Field Technician. Harris was responsible for conducting pavement condition survey for the entire network (867 miles). This provided the County with a current network pavement condition allowing a cost effective plan for future maintenance. A series of supplementary analysis were run in order for the County to better gauge the best way to spend their budget while improving the condition of their streets.

• City of Manteca, Pavement Management Program (PMP). Field Technician. Conducted network pavement condition survey on approximately 219 centerline miles. Harris also updated the City's maintenance and rehabilitation data, added/split/modified streets where needed, and ran budget scenarios. Generated a draft report that contained all findings and submitted it to the client.

• City of Oakland, Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update. Field Technician. Harris provided all services needed to conduct an update the 606 centerline miles of the City's street network. This provided the City with a current network pavement condition allowing a cost-effective plan for future maintenance. Marissa conducted pavement condition surveys; provided MTC with a post-inspection, software-generated, PCI report; updated client databases with Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) data, added/split/modified streets, current M&R unit costs and treatment types, and inflation, interest, and number of years for budget analyses; ran five budget scenarios and provided results to MTC; generated a draft report containing all findings and provided to both MTC and the municipal client; and submitted the final report to MTC and the municipal client.

EDUCATIONBS, Child/Adolescence Psychology

CERTIFICATIONSMTC, StreetSaver® RaterCertification ProgramOrange County TransportationAuthority (OCTA), PavementInspector Prequalification Program

SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTSMTC, Pavement Distress Survey and StreetSaver® Database Training2014 APWA Daly City Case Study2017 BCAG Pavement Management Program (PMP) Presentation


Harris & Associates, Inc. Appendix: Resumes XIV

Paul MuseINSPECTOR

Paul Muse is an MTC-trained and OCTA-trained pavement inspector. He is well-versed in the use of StreetSaver® Online Version (9.0), specializing in GIS segmentation using ArcGIS software. To date, Paul has provided pavement inspection and GIS segmentation services for approximately 2,000 miles of roadway, including non-federal-aid highways and roads. His commitment to pavement inspection is especially demonstrated through the exceptional services he provides to his clients. Paul is familiar with Mountain house having performed pavement surveys for the District.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• Mountain House Community Services District, Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update. Field Technician. Conducted pavement condition survey of 60 centerline miles; Calculated condition assessments according to MTCs PCI Distress Identification Manual for each pavement segment; Incorporated segmented pavement network into MTC StreetSaver® database; and Generated an analysis of five different budget scenarios and submitted a final report summarizing the results obtained.

• County of Santa Clara, Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update. Field Technician. Involved in pavement condition surveying of 59 centerline miles of arterials and intersections. Provided quality control of 5% of the original inspections.

• City of Stockton, Pavement Program Management Update. Field Technician.Conducted pavement condition survey of 585 centerline miles of streets using MTC PMP database. Updating length, width, functional class and surface type as needed Harris also integrate a segmented shape file with the StreetSaver program.

• City of Gonzales, Pavement Management Update. Field Technician. Developed a new PMP database for the City of Gonzales. Preformed field distress surveys. Calculated budget needs for rehab or replacing defiant segments. Generated budget scenarios and out together 10 year pavement plan for various funding strategies.

• CSU Monterey Bay, Pavement Management Program (PMP) Update. Field Technician. Used Paver 7.0.6 to create a database from scratch using maps provided by the agency. Assigned STID’s and SECID’s to each pavement segment (streets & parking lots). Conducted pavement condition survey of 17 miles of roadway and 38 parking lots. Calculated condition assessment based on the Army Corps of Engineers Micro Paver distress manual’s (Asphalt & Concrete). Updated the database with Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) data, added/split/modified streets, current M&R unit costs, treatment types, inflation, interest and number of years for budget analyses.

EDUCATIONMA, GeographyBA, Geography


SNG & Associates, Inc.

5776 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 365, Pleasanton, CA 94588 Phone: 925-251-0100 Fax: 925-242-5894

PROFESSIONAL

CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER

RELATED COST

CERTIFICATION AUDIT

SERVICES

MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

September 20, 2018


Proposal for Professional Construction and

Cost Certification Audit Services


2 | P a g e

Mr. Anthony Docto, P.E. Development Manager Mountain House Community Services District 230 S. Sterling Drive, Suite 100 Mountain House, CA 95391

SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER RELATED COST CERTIFICATION AUDIT SERVICES

Dear Mr. Docto,

SNG & Associates, Inc. (SNG) is excited to present this Proposal for your consideration to provide professional construction and other related cost certification audit services to Mountain House Community Services District (District). We feel strongly that we can provide the District with a thorough and accurate cost certification services within the timelines specified by the District.

Since its establishment in 1999, SNG has provided professional engineering services to many local agencies in Northern California in adopting and managing master plans, specific plans, fee programs, finance plans, and in negotiation of reimbursement and development agreements. Our experience in managing large land development projects and Capital Improvement Programs will enable us to work seamlessly with District’s staff in certifying eligible Developer’s costs for reimbursements.

We are especially sensitive to the demands on the staff time due to limited staffing resources, and the importance of expedited completion of cost certification audit, and hence our goal would be to most effectively support agency staff’s efforts by proactively identifying the critical issues, by presenting solutions, and by maintaining effective communications.

SNG is proposing Mr. Nanda Gottiparthy, P.E., as the Project Manager and as the main point of contact for District staff. Mr. Gottiparthy will be supported by Mr. Dan Fitzgerald, P.E., Mr. Bruce Jacks, P.E., Mr. Michael O’Connor, P.E., Mr. Douglas Rodgers, Ms. Linda Moniz and engineering support staff. SNG Project Team members have provided services identical to the requirements identified in the Request for Proposal for many local agencies. For example, the project team members have provided support in impact fee adoption (AB 1600 analyses), administration of impact fee reimbursement agreements, benefit districts, and CFF/TIF implementation for Dublin, Tracy, Livingston, Patterson, Atwater, Hayward, Lodi, and Livermore.

Our team members have managed preparation of many master plans, capital improvement programs and fee programs and have a thorough understanding of private developments’ role and legal requirements relating to construction and financing of public facilities and improvements, benefit assessments and reimbursements.





3 | P a g e

Our success in providing highest quality of staff support services is demonstrated by the trust our long-term clients such as City of Dublin, City of Tracy, City of Brentwood, City of Livermore and City of Livingston have placed in us by contracting with us for many years. Due to our current involvement in providing staff support services to the District, close proximity of our office and staff members living in the area, we will be highly responsive to District’s requests. Our team is committed to completing the review of the documents in an expeditious manner to achieve District’s goals within stated timelines.

SNG has been assisting MHCSD staff in review of land development projects. Our current involvement with District staff and familiarity with major planned improvement projects such as Grant Line Road widening project will enable us to quickly begin work and coordinate efficiently with appropriate staff. In addition, SNG has worked with many engineering firms that are involved in projects in Mountain House in review of plans for other agencies. We have also worked extensively with lead staff of Harris & Associates involved in preparation of CFF/TIF documents. Our previous experience and relationships with staff and stakeholders will ensure successful completion of the reimbursement agreements and cost audits.

Mountain House has been transforming into a highly desirable community where families are looking to move for better quality of life, safe neighborhoods and schools. The innovative approach and the vision in funding and developing the infrastructure needed for a new community is evident in the extent and quality of public infrastructure the District has so far constructed. As you continue your efforts in updating the CFF/TIF fees and implementing the Reimbursement Program, SNG & Associates would welcome an opportunity to be a part of the team.

We thank you for the opportunity and look forward to presenting our qualifications in person. If selected, we will execute the District’s standard professional services contract with associated insurance requirements. This proposal is a firm and irrevocable offer of services for the stated period of time.

Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me by phone or e-mail at [email protected].

Sincerely, SNG & ASSOCIATES, INC. Nanda K. Gottiparthy, P.E. President


mailto:[email protected]




4 | P a g e

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cover Letter ............................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................. 5 Qualifications and Experience ………….………………………………… ....... 5

• Company Profile ....................................................... 5

• Client Cities ....................................................... 6

• Services ....................................................... 6

• Project Experience ....................................................... 7

• Staffing Plan ....................................................... 11

• Staff Qualifications & Experience .................................... 11 Project Understanding ............................................................... 12 Project Approach ...................................................................... 14 References ...................................................................... 19 Project Team ............................................................................. 20 Resumes ............................................................................. 22 Testimonial ............................................................................. 34





5 | P a g e

Introduction and Qualifications

SNG presents a collaborative approach to work in close partnership with the City to provide construction and other related cost certification services in a seamless fashion. SNG staff has been working with Mountain House Community Services District in review and coordination improvement plans and maps for land development and capital improvement projects. Each of the senior engineers proposed for the project have been intimately involved in processing of land development projects, construction management and managing fee programs for many local agencies.

Following sections address requirements listed in the RFP, and describe in brief our qualifications and services SNG is committed to providing to the District:

1. Independence

SNG & Associates, Inc. currently provides plan review services for land development and capital improvement projects for Mountain House CSD. SNG is independent of the MHCSD as defined by generally accepted auditing standards and US general Accounting Office’s Government Auditing Standards. SNG provides services exclusively to public agencies, and SNG staff has not had any professional relationships with Mountain House Investors or Mountain House Development. SNG’s current contract with MHCSD will not constitute a conflict of interest relative to performing the proposed audit.

2. Insurance Requirements

Prior to commencing any work, SNG will provide proper insurance certificates demonstrating that the types and amounts of insurance coverage and any endorsements specified in the RFP are properly issued and in effect. MHCSD has insurance certificates on file for SNG for the current assignment.

3. Firm Qualifications and Experience

SNG & Associates, Inc. (SNG), a California corporation, was established in 1999, and has been assisting local agencies in the area of municipal engineering with a primary focus in land development, capital improvement project design and construction management. SNG staff is experienced in assisting agencies in setting up Community Facilities Fee and Transportation Improvement Fee programs, benefit districts, preparing AB 1600 analyses, and administering Infrastructure Reimbursement programs.

Because all our senior engineers have worked with local agency staff in all aspects of engineering review, design, project management





6 | P a g e

and administration, bid services, construction inspections, and construction management, we can most effectively provide the audit services being requested. We have prepared and processed more than one hundred reimbursement agreements, and hence we have dealt with most complex issues that arise in determining the reimbursable costs.

SNG’s project team members have assisted numerous agencies providing services similar to the scope of work requested in the RFP. SNG’s clients have included the following cities:

• City of San Leandro • City of Tracy

• City of Livermore • City of Hayward

• City of Livingston • City of Atwater

• City of Patterson • City of Oakdale

• City of Brentwood • City of Lodi

• City of Lathrop • City of Dublin

• City of Vallejo • City of Emeryville

SNG prides itself in providing comprehensive engineering services from project inception to final inspections and acceptance. Services provided cover the following areas:

• Finance Plans and Reimbursement Agreements

• Benefit Districts

• AB 1600 Studies

• CFF/TIF Management

• Public Infrastructure Improvements Design and Review

• Private Development Plan Review

• Federal and State Grant projects management

• Caltrans Local Assistance Coordination

• Public Works Inspections and Construction Management

• Specific Plans, Master Plans, Capacity Studies

• Tentative Maps, Parcel Maps Review

• Development Agreements, Subdivision Agreements

• Staff Augmentation





7 | P a g e

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

SNG has extensive experience offering on-call engineering and staff support services to Cities. The range of services we provide to our client cities include all tasks involved in CIP projects from project planning and design to construction, and in private development review from entitlement phase to final acceptance and bond release.

In addition to providing design and plan review services, we have been assisting agencies’ staff in managing technical studies, EIRs, CIP budgets, Finance Plans, Community Facilities Fees and Transportation Impact Fee Programs, Developer Reimbursement Agreements, Benefit Districts, State and Federal grant applications, preparation of Engineering Conditions of Approval, City Council staff reports and resolutions, negotiating Development Agreements, Right-of-way acquisitions/abandonments, subdivision agreements, engineering inspections and staff augmentation.

Following is a partial list of on-going and recently completed projects:

CITY OF TRACY- Engineering Staff Support Services (2000 - 2010); (2014 to Present)

SNG has been providing plan review and project management services for numerous land development projects, managing technical studies, impacts, mitigations, finance plans, preparing conditions of approval, preparing agreements, review of maps, construction management, inspection and final project acceptance. The projects include small to large residential subdivisions within the Residential Specific Plan area, Plan “C”, several auto dealerships, commercial shopping centers, fire stations, and churches, service stations within the Infill area and I-205 Specific Plan, and large industrial developments within the Northeast Industrial area. For all projects, SNG staff has been responsible to coordinate with Planning, Fire Department, Maintenance Division, Parks and Community Services Department and City Attorney’s Office.

Residential Developments: Managed and coordinated work of City consultants and provided review services for several large residential projects such as West Tracy (330 acres), East Lake (150 acres), West Corral Hollow (234 acres), Cheng Property (293 acres) and Souza Citation project (137 acres) for which complex advance planning of infrastructure and financing, preparation of various technical studies and Impact and Burden Analyses were completed.

SNG is currently managing and providing all review and processing services for Tracy Hills project, a master planned community consisting of 5500 homes and 680 acres of commercial and industrial areas. SNG has provided extensive coordination between City departments, external agencies, consultants and developer in preparation and approval of Tracy Hills Specific Plan, EIR, Development Agreement, Vesting Tentative Maps and sixteen Final Maps.





8 | P a g e

Retail Commercial Developments: Development of the Tracy Mall project, a 110-acre regional shopping center consisting of approximately 983,000 S.F. of gross building area, with five major department stores, a junior department store, a multi-screen theater and about 130 retail tenants.

Industrial Subdivisions: Coordination and review of conceptual plans, master infrastructure plans, finance and implementation plans, and design of roadways, storm, water and sanitary sewer lines for 680-acre Northeast Industrial Specific Plan area in Tracy. Other industrial projects included 100-acre Industrial project Tracy Logistics Center, 80-acre Prologis Industrial subdivision, 40-acre Chabot Commerce Center industrial subdivision, 70-acre South Tracy Industrial Park, Kellogg Warehouse, and numerous other minor industrial and commercial developments.

SNG is currently providing project management and review services for Cordes Ranch (International Park of Commerce) consisting of 1780 acres of industrial and commercial areas. SNG staff has acted as City’s project manager to coordinate and process various technical analyses, CEQA analyses, fee calculations, fee credits and reimbursements, Conditions of approval, agreements, and improvement plan review for water, wastewater, and transportation infrastructure improvements.

CITY OF LIVINGSTON- On-call Engineering/City Engineer (2003 -14)

SNG provided City Engineer and full staffing needed to provide all engineering functions for the City of Livingston for over 10 years. Range of services provided include development plan review, design and construction management for capital projects, processing development applications, preparation of agreements, master plans, set up impact fee programs, implement fee credits and reimbursements for infrastructure improvements. Also prepared City Council reports and resolutions, property acquisition, and inspection of private development projects and public infrastructure projects.

SNG staff prepared numerous successful grant applications for State and Federal Grants, processed Grant Agreements, prepared PS&E, provided bidding and contract administration, inspections and reimbursement processing.

Partial List of Federal and State Grant Projects included ❖ Bird Bridge HBRRP Project ❖ B St. at Winton Parkway Traffic Signal (HES) ❖ PROP 13 City-wide Water Infrastructure Improvements ❖ Safe Routes to Schools projects Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 8 ❖ Safe Routes to Schools projects - Federal Cycle 2 ❖ LWCF Basketball Courts, LWCF Picnic Shelter & Restroom Facility ❖ HWY 99 Sewer Lift Station





9 | P a g e

Residential projects included Gallo PUD (1600 lots), Ranchwood (1800 lots), Sun Valley Estates (180 lots), Kishi Subdivision (159 lots), Davante Villas (152 lots), Bear River Crossing, and numerous minor subdivisions.

Industrial/Commercial projects included Foster Farms Cold Distribution Storage Plant, Winton Parkway Commercial Center, Travel Centers of America, and Blueberry Crossing Commercial Center.

CITY OF DUBLIN - On-Call Engineering Services (2000 - Present):

SNG has been providing development and CIP project review services to City of Dublin for almost 18 years. SNG provides support in reviewing all types of development applications and permits including preparation of conditions of approval for planning applications, review of EIR’s, assist in TIF reimbursements and free credit calculations, plan review of residential and commercial developments, preparation of agreements, staff reports to City Council and project close-out. Numerous projects requiring compliance with Stormwater regulations C.3 and C.10, Title 24 accessibility regulations and complex hydraulic design issues have been reviewed.

An example of a recent subdivision is Schaefer Ranch, a Residential project consisting of 480 homes that required extensive hillside grading, storm drainage detention and water quality basins, establishment of Geological Hazard Abatement District (GHAD). Commercial and multi-family residential subdivisions recently reviewed include Tassajara Highlands, Transit Center, A-Loft Hotel, Kaiser Medical Facility, Grafton Plaza and numerous minor projects.

SNG has assisted the City in review of CIP projects for several parks, Aquatic Park, Fire Safety Building, and the Public Works Maintenance Facility.

CITY OF LIVERMORE - Engineering Services (2014 to Present)

SNG has been providing a wide range of civil engineering services including development plan review, capital project design review, ADA compliance review, final/parcel map review, hydrology and hydraulics review, hydromodification review and BAHM analysis, C.3 compliance, stormwater treatment management plan review and implementation, erosion control and stormwater pollution prevention plan review, and assist in review and update of TIF program and fee credits for recent projects.

Partial list of projects reviewed include:

Brisa Station, Vasco Road, 531 units of multi and single-family housing subdivision of 37.5 acres of property located east of Vasco Road.





10 | P a g e

Tract 8121, Portola Avenue, a commercial and residential development (164 multi-family units) located south of Portola Avenue.

Planning Entitlements Review: SNG has provided full support in review and processing of Site Design Review (SDR), Conditional Use Permits, Tentative Maps, Zoning Applications, Initial Study documents, specific plans, Planned Developments, plot plans, tenant improvements review and other types of applications.

CITY OF LODI: Staff Support (2001-2005, 2013 -Present) SNG has assisted City of Lodi in setting up benefit districts, preparation of reimbursement agreements for private developments. Projects include: Lodi Walmart #1789 Shopping Center, Kettleman Lane & Lower Sacramento Road project, Richards Ranch, Thayer Ranch, Kettleman Lane & New Beckman Lane Project, Tienda Drive Improvements, and Guild Avenue Improvements.

CITY OF ATWATER - City Engineer/ Staff Support (2007 - 10)

SNG provided City Engineer and staff support services and provided support in all functions of Engineering department. Provided services for processing of private developments and provided inspections during construction phase. SNG staff reviewed numerous residential subdivisions, processed project closeouts, reimbursements, and assisted staff in setting up assessment and benefit districts.

CITY OF OAKDALE - City Engineer/ Engineering Services (2012-13)

SNG provided Interim City Engineer and staff support services during the transition of management in Public Works Department. SNG provided plan review for residential and commercial developments, design of federal funded projects, and construction oversight. SNG reviewed various specific plans and Finance Plans for consistency with General Plan Update and assisted in review status of development impact fee program.

CITY OF PATTERSON - On-call Engineering Services (2007 - 2010)

SNG provided on-call design engineering and construction management services for numerous capital improvement projects and assisted in preparation of Subdivision Agreements and Reimbursement Agreements for residential and commercial developments. SNG worked closely with staff in scoping and developing cost estimates and budgets for CIPs and provided support services from inception to final close out of projects.

CITY OF VALLEJO - On-call Engineering Services (2005 - 2008)

Provided staff support services for processing of land development projects. Prepared staff reports, reimbursement agreements, coordinated with utilities, other departments, and provided services for project close-out.





11 | P a g e

Staffing Plan

Project Mgr/Supervisor and Staff Qualifications and Experience

SNG’s office is located in Pleasanton, California. Due to the proximity of our office to the District offices, our staff can be very responsive and efficient in gathering data and documents, field visits and in attending meetings with staff and Developers. Our staff consists of six senior staff with over 20 years of experience, two Associate Engineers with ten years of experience, one Assistant Engineer and two support staff members.

The project team proposed for this project will consists of the following:

Mr. Nanda Gottiparthy, P.E. – Project Manager, Quality Control

Mr. Bruce Jacks, P.E. – Senior Engineer

Mr. Dan Fitzgerald, P.E. – Senior Engineer

Mr. Michael O’Connor, P.E – Senior Engineer

Mr. Douglas Rodgers, Senior Engineer, Project Coordinator

Ms. Linda Moniz, Financial Analyst

Ms. Sheetal Parmar, EIT, Associate Engineer

Mr. Harmeet Kaloty, EIT – Associate Engineer

Ms. Mithra Devaram, EIT – Assistant Engineer

Mr. Nanda Gottiparthy is the President of the firm, and he is authorized to bind the firm and commit resources as needed for this important task.

Mr. Nanda Gottiparthy, P.E will be the Project Manager and will provide oversight for the entire duration of the project. He will be the primary contact to District staff for ensuring proper allocation of resources and personnel, report on the progress, and seek District’s input on key policy matters and decisions. Mr. Gottiparthy managed engineering departments and land development sections at several cities in his roles as Contract City Engineer at City of Livingston, City of Oakdale and City of Atwater, and as a Senior Engineer at City of Tracy and City of San Leandro. He worked on numerous reimbursement agreements and benefit assessment districts, and has managed preparation of master plans, finance plans, and AB 1600 analyses.

In order to complete the audit for all projects listed in the RFP within four months, our approach is to assign four senior engineers that will each lead the work on 5 -10 projects simultaneously. The Senior Engineers that will be assigned to the projects will be Mr. Bruce Jacks, P.E., Mr. Dan Fitzgerald, P.E., Mr. Mike O’Connor, P.E. and Mr. Douglas Rodgers. All the Senior Engineers have extensive experience (at least 20 years) working on all stages of land development and capital improvement projects and have high level of expertise in reviewing reimbursement requests and preparation of reports/memos.

Mr. Bruce Jacks, Mr. Dan Fitzgerald, Mike O’Connor, and Doug Rogers will be responsible for review of documents, preparation of reports, attendance of meetings, and keeping communications with other team members, support staff, District staff, and Developers.





12 | P a g e

Project Understanding

Mr. Douglas Rodgers currently assists land development staff in review of improvement plans and works out of the District’s office 1-2 days per week. Due to his presence at the District office, he will also assist in coordinating the efforts of the senior engineers and other SNG staff with District staff and Developers. Mr. Rodgers will be able to adjust his schedule at the District office to efficiently direct the coordination efforts.

Ms. Linda Moniz will be assigned to work out of the District offices at least three days per week. Her role will be to coordinate gathering of financial data and documents such as agreements, finance plans, ordinances and policies applicable to reimbursements, set up reports and also act as a coordinator between the Senior Engineers and District staff including Finance Department. Ms. Moniz’s experience in working with engineering and finance departments in managing fee programs for the City of Tracy will be very helpful in efficient document retrieval and coordination with staff.

Mr. Harmeet Kaloty, EIT, Ms. Sheetal Parmar, EIT, and Ms. Mithra Devaram, EIT will support the Senior Engineers in preparation of exhibits, reports and documentation; all three team members are well experienced in review of improvement plans for land development projects, and in preparation of agreements and bond estimates for infrastructure improvement projects.

SNG commits every member of the project team to be available and work on the project for the entire duration of the project. Resumes of proposed team members are attached.

Community Facilities Fees

The Community Facilities Fee (CFF) adopted by the San Joaquin Board of Supervisors on August 22, 2000, finances the construction of community facilities required to implement the Master Plan facilities construction including Park Facilities, Library Facilities, and Public Safety and Administration Facilities. In January 2003, the CFF Fees were updated to December 2002 costs. The District applies an automatic ENR update each year to the adopted fees.

Developers may receive credit against the CFF or reimbursement for facilities they construct up to the amount of the estimated cost in the CFF document (adjusted by ENR) or their actual cost, whichever is less. The Developers are required to submit their construction documents and go through a cost certification process by the MHCSD in order to obtain reimbursements through the Developer Reimbursement program.

The Developers shall not be entitled to a credit or reimbursement that exceeds the cost of the facility in the CFF, escalated by ENR, to the date of acceptance of the facility. Reimbursement from the CFF for the facilities identified in the CFF Technical Report cost estimates will be available to the extent that funds are collected and available in the TIF fund balance; no money from the General Fund or other MHCSD funds may be used to reimburse the Developer. Typically,





13 | P a g e

temporary improvements or facilities are not eligible for reimbursements or fee credits, unless specifically approved by the District.

Based on the report prepared by Harris & Associates, as of December 31, 2017, the credit balance for Park Facilities is $1,573,101 and $75,790 for Public Safety and Administration Facilities. There is no credit balance for Library Facilities. The fund balance for Park Facilities is $11,563,124, negative $187,755 for Library Facilities, and $3,894,824 for the Public Safety and Administration Facilities.

Transportation Improvement Fee

The Transportation Improvement Fee (TIF) for the Mountain House Community was adopted on April 11, 2000. The TIF finances the construction of transportation improvements within the community as well as the fair share of transportation obligations in other jurisdictions that are required to implement the Mountain House Master Plan. This includes arterial and collector roadways, transit equipment, transit facilities, roadway landscaping, street lighting, street signage, sound walls, signalization, medians, and bridges. The fees also fund the Mountain House Community Service District (CSD) share of regional roadways both within and outside of the CSD Sphere of Influence.

In January 2003, the CSD updated the TIF Technical Report (2003 TIF) based on the Engineering News Record 20-City Construction Cost Index (ENR), new construction costs, and changes in design standards. The CSD has applied an automatic ENR update each year.

The TIF is used primarily as a reimbursement mechanism for Developers who fund the construction of the specified transportation improvements. Developers may receive credit against the TIF or reimbursement for facilities they construct up to the amount of the estimated costs in the TIF document, adjusted by ENR, or their actual cost, whichever is less. The Developers are required to submit their construction cost documents and go through a cost certification process by the CSD prior to getting reimbursement through the Developer Reimbursement Program.

Based on the report prepared by Harris & Associates, as of December 31, 2017 the TIF credit balance is $55,505,587. The projected TIF fund balance is $1,965,573.

Over the past year or so, MHCSD has engaged in a comprehensive analysis of the Community Facilities Fee (CFF) and the Transportation Improvement Fee (TIF). The goal of the analysis was to review, and refine as necessary, the costs of implementation of the CFF and TIF in compliance with the applicable ordinances, resolutions, technical reports and state law. At the September 12, 2018 Board of Directors meeting, the Board heard recommendations for fee update.

SNG staff will review the Municipal Code, Master Plan, Public Facilities Financing Plan and Specific Plans in applying the general policies mentioned above to determination of eligible costs for reimbursements.





14 | P a g e

Approach Project Approach

As indicated above, SNG is committed to providing four senior engineers to lead the effort in gathering the information, field reviews, cost reviews, preparation of audit report/technical memorandum for each project. Based on the type, Developer, geographical location and other criteria, the Project Manager will assign groups of projects to each of the senior engineers. This approach will enable us to begin work on all projects assigned at the same time. The segmentation and distribution of projects among the senior engineers will allow us to complete tasks in an expeditious manner. The Project Manager will make sure that any directives and policy matter clarifications obtained from the District for one project will be conveyed to all SNG team members for consistency and efficient use of the District’s staff’s time.

Depending on the complexity and availability of information, duration of each project may vary. Sometimes, a smaller project may take longer time to finalize if the Developer is non-responsive, or some critical element of the work needs to be verified or clarified by the District staff. It will be the responsibility of SNG’s Project Manager and Senior Engineers to plan their schedules and keep the projects moving at all times. The goal of SNG’s team would be to complete all projects within the four months duration as required in the RFP. Our Senior Engineers have managed complex projects involving numerous agencies, Developers, contractors, engineers and other stakeholders. Their coordination and management skills will enable them to prioritize and efficiently complete tasks.

In order to more efficiently address questions or obtain feedback on policy matters from the District, the Senior Engineers will present the items that need District staff’s attention in groups and try to obtain feedback at the bi-weekly meetings. E-mails will be used to provide summarized information with suggestions/recommendations by SNG to assist staff in reviewing the issues without having to spend much time going over the documents or plans.

The Project Manager, Senior Engineer(s) and Financial Analyst will attend the bi-weekly meetings with District staff and Developers. These meetings will initially focus on the applicable adopted documents such as master plans, finance plans, capital improvement program, fees collected, accounts information, reimbursement/ development agreements, adopted policies and criteria to be applied to the process of cost certification.

Subsequent meetings will provide status on each project, discuss missing or inadequate information, approach to resolving issues in fair, defensible and expedient way. Ms. Linda Moniz will prepare meeting agenda, minutes, action items and critical path items and distribute the document to staff every week.





15 | P a g e

Task 1 – Initial Kick-off Meeting

Upon issuance of Notice-to-proceed, the Project Manager will set up the Initial kick-off Meeting with District staff. The Project Manager, Senior Engineers and Financial Analyst from SNG will attend the meeting and review the available binders for the projects. The meeting will focus on confirming the scope of work, priorities, project approach, establish clear lines of communication, establish schedule for bi-weekly meetings, obtain documents that will form basis of cost certification, and clarify policies applicable to eligible reimbursements. The information relating to adopted CIPs, budgets, program funding, fees collected, available reimbursements, account information etc. will be gathered.

SNG staff understands that all the backup documentation may not be readily available; the Project Manager will assign SNG staff to spend time at the District office to retrieve maps, plans, as-builts, financial data etc. Because of our extensive experience in working on land development and CIP projects, our staff will be proactive in identifying sources of information such as development Conditions of Approval, agreements, resolutions etc. to fill in the missing information. SNG staff’s goal would be to minimize District staff’s time in gathering of the data and documents.

Once the basic information and binders are made available, SNG staff will prepare technical memorandum listing any additional documents, plans, maps and calculations that will need to be acquired from the Developer. SNG staff will prepare letters requesting information for the District staff to readily send them out to the Developers.

While the information requested is being compiled by Developer or District staff, the project team members will initiate review of available documents, prepare exhibits, spreadsheets and formats for detailed Technical memorandums to be prepared for each project. Mr. Doug Rodgers and Ms. Linda Moniz will spend time at the District office gathering and transmitting information to senior engineers.

Task 2 - Field Review:

It will be mandatory for the team members to visit each project site to confirm existing field conditions, to identify any discrepancies between submitted requests for reimbursements and completed improvements. SNG staff will coordinate with project inspectors for field changes, change orders etc. that may not have been reflected on the improvement plans. Staff records relevant field conditions with pictures and field notes to assist during cost certification audit, and to be included in the final documentation.

Our senior engineers have strong construction management backgrounds, and hence will be able to quickly identify issues and propose efficient ways to resolve discrepancies and identify solutions.





16 | P a g e

Task 3 – Reimbursement Cost Review:

With each of the senior engineer’s experience of 20-plus years, and a strong support team, we believe that our team is most suited to undertake this project and also commit to complete the tasks within the specified duration of four months.

SNG team will proactively seek documents and supporting information such as invoices, change order justification, payment records and other documents from the Developer. The information received will be recorded, and appropriate exhibits and attachments to the technical reports will be prepared. The technical memorandums will clearly describe the items eligible for reimbursements, the basis of determination of quantities and final costs. Any items from the request for reimbursements that are not eligible for reimbursement will be clearly noted along with reasons for such determination.

The submitted expenditures and payment records will be closely scrutinized to ensure compliance with the reimbursement policies. For example, review will focus on any line items that may be listed differently from the cost estimate line items within the program such as cost of dewatering, erosion control measures, temporary stockpiling of materials, profit and overhead items etc.

The description of items, spreadsheets, exhibits and attachments to the technical memorandum will present the complete analysis in sufficient detail for ease of reference by engineering and finance departments. SNG’s Financial Analyst will identify proper account numbers and descriptions based on input from Finance staff.

SNG staff will coordinate its work with appropriate District personnel to obtain information relating to the Capital Improvement Program, adopted fee structure, listing of infrastructure funded by the CFF/TIF fee program, fee payments received from Developers from Finance records, available fund balances, and applicable policy documents relating to reimbursements. SNG staff will compare the cost of eligible reimbursements to available funding and discuss discrepancies or issues with District staff.

Because of our on-going and recent experience with City of Dublin, City of Tracy, City of Patterson, City of Lodi and others in managing the CFF/TIF reimbursement programs with complex fee credit and reimbursement procedures, we can readily generate reports and track comments and directives for a consistent and fair application of policies.

SNG staff will attend meetings with the Developers to help resolve issues that may arise from the audit. SNG staff has extensive experience in resolving matters related to land development and construction





17 | P a g e

management. SNG staff is skilled in presenting the issues and negotiating solutions with Developers with primary goal of achieving District’s goals, and fair and consistent application of reimbursement policies.

An example of a recently completed reimbursement agreement for a large commercial development consisting of Walmart as anchor store in Lodi involved complex analysis of nexus and fair share cost allocation between benefiting properties which included commercial and residential developments. Due to multiple owners, contractors, CIP projects for roadways and regional storm drainage basins etc., and lapse of several years after the improvements have been constructed, SNG staff worked closely with City staff and the Developers to resolve many concerns.

Task 4 – Prepare an Audit Report

Upon thorough review of documents for reimbursement requests, SNG staff will prepare a Technical Memorandum. The memorandum will consist of clear and concise description of scope of improvements, basis of evaluation of eligible reimbursements, verification of costs using contracts, invoices, payment records and other supporting documents, spreadsheets, exhibits and attachments.

SNG staff has prepared many technical memorandums that have been used in establishing benefit districts, reimbursement agreements and fee calculations and CFF/TIF program management. A draft of the memorandum will be presented to staff for input, and after all comments are addressed, a final memorandum will be issued.

Task 5 – Project Meetings

In addition to bi-weekly meetings with District staff, SNG’s Project Manager and Senior Engineers will attend meetings as necessary to present and discuss reimbursement costs and approach to determination of eligible costs for reimbursements. The project team will coordinate receipt of information and additional documentation when needed to properly document eligibility.

We will prepare meeting agenda, conduct meetings as required by the District, follow-up with meeting notes and action items distribution. Again, our goal throughout the project will be to minimize the time burden on District staff. Meetings will be set up only when required; we strive to resolve issues and coordinate tasks using e-mails and phone calls to the extent possible.





18 | P a g e

Anticipated Potential Cost Audit Problems

In our experience, the most common potential problem in performing audits is incomplete information submitted by the Developers. Sometimes due to the time lapse between the time the construction is completed to the time of review of reimbursement request or due to poor records, the request and back-up documentation for payments, or change order process and tracking of additional costs, or lien releases may be incomplete. SNG staff has worked on several reimbursement requests that fall in this category. Best efforts will be put into obtaining the most documentation feasible from the Developers, and in cases when it is not possible to obtain certain information, SNG will suggest alternative means of coming up with a reasonable and defensible cost will be discussed with the District. SNG staff will ensure compliance with District procedures and policies and document the methods of determination of such cost items.

Another issue we deal with routinely on reimbursement requests is the differences in private Developer’s bid items and program line items of work. For example, the private contractors may bid items of work related to pipe installation (such as mobilization, dewatering, traffic control or erosion control measures) separately or have different contractors providing such services. In such occurrences, the reviewer will need to glean items of work that qualify together for items of work and separate ineligible costs (such as temporary or unrelated costs).

Sometimes there may be more than one Developer completing a particular improvement – for example, two sides of an arterial street. In such cases, the claims may overlap or interim improvements such as temporary fencing, paving, shoulders, striping etc. may be included in the submitted cost items. SNG will prepare accurate quantity take-offs supported by exhibits to clearly demonstrate eligible and ineligible items in the report.

There may be instances that the Developer presents costs in excess of program costs with supporting documentation. Developers may place claims for additional costs based on differing field conditions than assumed in program costs (such as groundwater pumping, major utility conflicts), or requests for changes directed by District staff or other reasons. In such case, SNG staff will review the history and documents to determine the validity of claims and recommend action. SNG staff will consult as needed with District staff to resolve some issues.

Based on our experience, majority of the issues that arise will be resolved by the Project Manager and Senior Engineer with information updates provided to District staff on a regular basis as the issues are being resolved.





19 | P a g e

References

References

SNG team members have worked extensively with many agencies in Northern California in providing engineering services that included services for cost verification services including the following:

1. City of Tracy, Development & Engineering Services

Mr. Robert Armijo, City Engineer Phone:(209)831-6424; E-mail: [email protected]

Mr. William Dean, Assistant Director of DES Phone:(209)831-6427; E-mail:[email protected]

2. City of Lodi, Engineering

Mr. Charles Swimley, Director Public Works Phone:(209)333-6800; E-mail: [email protected]

3. City of Dublin, Public Works Department

Ms. Laurie Sucgang, Senior Engineer Phone:(925)833-6630; E-mail: [email protected]

4. City of Livingston, Engineering

Humberto Molina, Former Public Works Director

Phone: 209-509-6601

Donna Kenney, Former Community Development Director Phone: 209-202-8289

Additional Information Required

The RFP package has been very thorough and sufficiently detailed; SNG does not need additional information from the District prior to accepting the engagement.

Delegation or subcontracting.

SNG will not delegate or subcontract its responsibilities without prior written consent of the District.

Cost Proposal

Sealed Cost proposal is submitted under separate cover with this Proposal.









20 | P a g e

PROJECT TEAM KEY STAFF MEMBERS

Nanda Gottiparthy

Douglas Rodgers

Mike O’Connor

Bruce Jacks

Following sections describe briefly the qualifications of the Project Team members. All team members have extensive experience working with public agencies and have been recognized for their professionalism and excellent customer service. The resumes that provide additional details are also included.

Mr. Nanda Gottiparthy will serve as the Principle-in-Charge/Project Manager and will provide oversight for all projects. Mr. Gottiparthy has almost 30 years of experience in municipal engineering and management of development and capital improvement projects from inception to completion. He served as a Senior Civil Engineer for the City of Tracy and City of San Leandro and as Contract City Engineer for City of Livingston, City of Atwater, and City of Oakdale. He has a Master’s degree in Civil Engineering and is a Registered Civil Engineer in California.

Doug Rodgers has over 35 years of civil engineering experience, including extensive work in land surveying, land use planning, and entitlement processing in both the public and private sectors. Mr. Rodgers’ experience includes design of several land development projects for residential, commercial, and industrial development projects. He has a strong background in architectural and structural design, landscape architecture, environmental engineering, traffic engineering, geotechnical engineering, and construction management.

Michael O’Connor, P.E. has over 25 years of professional engineering experience working on a wide variety of public works infrastructure projects including Caltrans highway projects, local agency roadway projects, commercial and land development projects, and municipal public facilities water, sewer and storm infrastructure projects, and master plan CIP projects. Mr. O’Connor has extensive experience in engineering design, value engineering, constructability review, and public works inspection/resident engineer services. Mr. O’Connor has provided engineering review and development permit processing services for the Cities of Livingston, Dublin, Hayward, Tracy, and Lodi.

Bruce Jacks, P.E. Mr. Bruce Jacks has over 40 years of experience in the field of civil engineering, including extensive work in land surveying, land use planning and entitlement processing. Mr. Jacks’ experience includes technical design engineering, plan review and planning functions for a variety of residential, commercial and industrial site developments, as well as transportation and capital improvement projects. He managed topographic surveys, field inspections and provided construction management for large construction projects. Mr. Jacks currently assists MHCSD in review of improvement plans for land development projects.





21 | P a g e

Dan Fitzgerald

Linda Moniz

Sheetal Parmar

Harmeet Kaloty

Mithra Devaram

Mr. Dan Fitzgerald, P.E. Mr. Fitzgerald has more than 20+ years of engineering design and project management experience. He has strong technical, project management and construction expertise for civil engineering systems. He has managed engineering teams for the design and construction of a variety of projects at Department of the Navy facilities, US Army facilities and numerous private sector clients. Mr. Fitzgerald has worked on a wide variety of projects involving public infrastructure improvements and management of reimbursement requests – Island Wide Redevelopment projects at Treasure and Mare Islands, Oakland Army Base Redevelopment, SFPUC Hetch-Hetchy water tunnels, local agency sewer lift station projects, local agency permitting and field inspection projects, as well as numerous private commercial and land development projects. His responsibilities include program development, project management, planning, permitting and field inspection and construction management

Ms. Linda Moniz has over 17 years of experience performing highly technical and specialized accounting duties related to the implementation, administration, monitoring and reporting of Capital Improvement Projects, Finance and Implementation Plans and Capital-In-Lieu Fee revenue in Land Development. Ms. Moniz’s experience in working with engineering and finance departments in managing fee programs for the City of Tracy will be very helpful in efficient document retrieval, and coordination with staff.

Ms. Sheetal Parmar has over 8 years of experience in land development and capital improvement projects. She has a strong background in design preparing grading and drainage plans, utility design (storm, sanitary, and water), integrating topographic surveys and architectural site plans into AutoCAD and Civil 3D, and developing storm water management plans. Mr. Parmar is currently assisting City of Livermore in review of land development projects, encroachment permits, and in calculation of traffic impact fees.

Mr. Harmeet Kaloty has over 11 years of experience in civil engineering and project management services on numerous Public Works Capital Improvement and Private Development and Construction Projects. He will assist in preparing quantity takeoffs and validating reimbursement claim requests.

Ms. Mithra Devaram is a Junior Civil Engineer and has recently joined SNG. She works on Tenant Improvement projects, Building permits, Encroachment permits, Planning applications and drafting Staff reports and Improvement Agreements like SIA, OIA and DIA. Apart from this she also reviews Grading and Improvement plans for subdivision lots and street improvement plans





22 | P a g e

NANDA GOTTIPARTHY, P.E. Principal In-Charge/Project Manager

Professional Registration: Civil Engineer - CA No. 52308 Education: MS – Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Chennai, India

Management Highlights & Capabilities

• 30 Years of Civil and Municipal Engineering & Management Experience

• 10+ Years City Engineer Experience

• Review and approval of Land Development Projects Development Agreements, Subdivision Agreements and City Council Reports

• Capital Improvement Projects Planning, Design and Construction Management

• Managed federal and State grant-funded projects

• Infrastructure CIP and Budget Preparation

• Impact Fee Programs, Finance Plans

Mr. Gottiparthy has nearly 30 years of experience in municipal engineering and management of large development and capital improvement projects from inception to completion. He served as a Senior Civil Engineer for the City of Tracy and City of San Leandro and was responsible for managing all functions of the land development sections.

Mr. Gottiparthy served as the Contract City Engineer for the City of Livingston, City of Atwater and City of Oakdale. As a Consultant, he has assisted City of Dublin, City of Tracy, City of Lodi, City of Vallejo, City of San Leandro, City of Lathrop, City of Atwater, City of Patterson, City of Brentwood, and City of Livingston in processing of land development projects and design and construction of capital improvement projects. Managed CFF/TIF programs, prepared Reimbursement Agreements. Representative projects listed below:

City of Dublin - Staff Support Services (2000 - 2003, 2005 - Present)

Mr. Gottiparthy has been working with the City since 2000 providing plan review services for residential and commercial development projects, preparation of Conditions of Approval, Reimbursement Agreements, Council Communications, manage Traffic Impact Fees (TIF) – calculation of fee credits and reimbursements.

City of Tracy - Senior Civil Engineer (1992-1997) SNG Consultant services (2000-2007 and 2014-present)

Tracy Hills Specific Plan: Tracy Hills Is a master planned community in southwest Tracy that consists of 6,175 acres with 5,400 residential units and approximately 600 acres of commercial, industrial, office, and retail land uses.

Tracy Gateway Business Park: A 335-acre business park development designed to accommodate 5.8 million SF of floor area, a six-story hotel, and recreational facilities that include a nine-hole, championship level golf course and a series of stormwater management ponds.

Cordes Ranch (International Park of Commerce) Specific Plan: The International Park of Commerce is an 1,800-acre Master-Planned Business Park in Tracy; at full build-out, 19 million square feet of warehouse and office space will have been constructed.

I-205 Specific Plan: Mr. Gottiparthy provided engineering review and processing services from preliminary planning stages to project closeout for most of the projects within the I-205 Specific Plan consisting of West Valley Mall with 835,000 SF leasable area, 3 million SF of commercial & 1.7 million SF of Industrial developments.





23 | P a g e

Mr. Nanda Gottiparthy Selected Experience (continued)

Residential Specific Plan: Mr. Gottiparthy provided oversight of development agreements, conditions of approval, plan reviews, processing of maps, reimbursement agreements, and represented DES at Planning Commission and City Council meetings for majority of the 8,000 units built within the 1,480 acres of RSP. Projects included several shopping centers, school sites, parks, and storm drainage detention basins within the Specific Plan area.

City of Livingston - Department of Public Works Contract City Engineer and Staff Support Services (2003 - 2013)

Mr. Gottiparthy served as the Contract City Engineer for the City of Livingston from 2003 to 2013. He managed staff of SNG & Associates and City’s engineering/Public Works in all functions of the engineering division.

Mr. Gottiparthy initiated and assisted City of Livingston in adoption of Master Plans, Finance Plans and Impact Fees, managed Capital improvement Program, developer fee credits and reimbursements.

City of Lodi -On Call Development Review Services (2001 – 2004 and 2014- Present)

Assisted City of Lodi in setting up benefit districts, fee credit and reimbursement calculations, preparation of reimbursement agreements and review of residential and commercial subdivisions.

City of Oakdale - City Engineer and On-Call Engineering Services (2012 - 2014)

Provided Interim City Engineer and staff support services. Reviewed various specific plans and Finance Plans for consistency with the General Plan Update and adoption of development impact fees, Updated TIF program fee credits and reimbursements and prepared reimbursement agreements.





24 | P a g e

MICHAEL G. O’CONNOR, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer

Professional Registration Professional Civil Engineer California No 58144 Education BS, Civil Engineering Santa Clara University


• 25 Years of Civil Engineering Experience

• 10 Years of Municipal Engineering Experience

• Capital Improvement Engineering Experience

• Extension staff to the Local Municipalities/Agencies

• Managed Federal and State Grant Funded Projects

• Prepare Project Reports

• Impact Fee Programs – Credits and Reimbursements

Mr. O’Connor has over 25 years of professional engineering experience working on all types of public works infrastructure projects including transportation projects, water, sewer and storm infrastructure projects, and master plan CIP projects. Mr. O’Connor has worked in all aspects of project development -- from feasibility and technical studies to contract document preparation to construction engineering to final project closeout. He assisted in the management of impact fee programs, calculation of fee credits, and preparation of reimbursement agreements.

Mr. O’Connor has been providing technical expertise to assist with the review and processing of numerous development projects for several public agencies in the Bay Area and Central Valley, including the cities of Tracy, Dublin, Hayward, and Livingston.

Plan Review/Staff Support City of Dublin – Public Works Department

Plan Review processing of proposed improvements for private development tenant improvements; site development review referrals for conditions of approval, and site work permit inspections. Also provided plan reviews of Facility Management Dept. and Parks and Rec Dept. Capital Improvement Projects:

• Public Safety Complex, Phases 1 & 2

• Fire Dept. Maintenance Building and Corp Yard

• Emerald Glen Aquatic Center

• Fallon Sports Park CIP

Plan Review/Staff Support City of Tracy – Development Engineering Services

Cordes Ranch (International Park of Commerce): Mr. O’Connor managed review and processing of the development applications for several developments in the Cordes Ranch Specific Plan area, including Amazon Building 1, FedEx, MedLine, Building 6, Building 12, Building 25, and Buildings 22 and 23.

Ridgeline Properties Pescadero Ave: Mr. O’Connor prepared the Conditions of Approval for the 380,000 SF Distribution Warehouse in the Northeast Industrial Specific Plan area and reviewed the onsite and offsite improvement plans.

DCT Industrial Properties Arbor Ave: Mr. O’Connor prepared the Conditions of Approval for the 750,000 SF Distribution Warehouse in the I-205 Specific Plan area and reviewed the onsite and offsite improvement plans, including a regional detention basin and associated pump station.





25 | P a g e

MICHAEL G. O’CONNOR Senior Civil Engineer (continued)

City of Hayward Acting Development Review Engineer

Mr. O’Connor assisted the Planning Department of the City of Hayward as Contract Acting Development Review Engineer. Mr. O’Connor reviewed all applications for private development projects in the City.

City of Livingston Land Development and CIP projects

Provided staff support services in all aspects including: preparation of conditions of approval, agreements, design of capital improvement projects, construction management and final project acceptance.

• Phase 2 Waterline Improvement Project

• Citywide LED Streetlight Retrofit Project

• City of Livingston Pavement Rehab Project 2012

• Well 16 Media Replacement Project

City of Lodi

SNG has assisted City of Lodi in setting up benefit districts, preparation of reimbursement agreements and review of residential and commercial subdivisions.

• Rosegate Phase 1&2 Reimbursement Agreement

• Sunwest Village Reimbursement Agreement

Sacramento County

Project Manager, Project Engineer, Resident Engineer for Sacramento County Dept. of Transportation CIP projects

• Macready Avenue Reconstruction Project • Phase 3 & Phase 4 ADA Intersections Improvement

projects





26 | P a g e

DOUGLAS J. RODGERS Senior Engineer

Education: Chabot Community College Hayward, California

Mathematics, Science, Civil

Engineering and Land Surveying

courses


• Over 35 Years of Civil Engineering, Land Surveying, and Land Planning experience

• Designing, drafting and overseeing the production of a wide range of civil plans and survey maps.

• Performing, directing and reviewing all essential office and field work in support of engineering, surveying and planning projects

• Plan review for public agencies including engineering design review of subdivision and Capital Improvement Program improvement plans

• Project management and administration for public agencies involving the review, approval and permitting of both private sector development and public capital improvement projects

• TIF Program management assistance

Mr. Rodgers has over 35 years of experience in the field of civil engineering, including extensive work in land surveying, land use planning, and entitlement processing in public and private sectors.

Mr. Rodgers’s experience as a Project Engineer and Project Manager includes technical design engineering, plan review, surveying and planning functions for a variety of residential, commercial and industrial site developments, as well as transportation and capital improvement projects, including the preparation of street improvement plans, grading and drainage plans, stormwater quality control plans, utility plans, topographic surveys and performing field inspections of construction work.

Plan Review/Staff Support City of Dublin – Public Works Department

Mr. Rodgers provided plan review and project administration services on several large and complex residential and commercial development projects involving both public infrastructure and private site improvements. He provided calculations for fee credits and reimbursements for TIF program.:

• Grafton Plaza – a 12-acre Mixed-Use Development with hotel, commercial and townhouses, including public street widening.

• Kaiser Dublin Medical Center – 220,000 sf Medical Office Building with extensive off-site public street widening and storm drainage improvements.

• Tassajara Highlands – 48 lot Residential Development with extensive off-site public street widening and storm drainage improvements.

• IKEA – 432,099 sq. ft. commercial development on 24.75 acres, anchored by a 339,099 sq. ft. IKEA store and including 93,000 sq. ft. of retail/restaurant uses.

• At-Dublin – A 76-acre Mixed Use Multi-phase Development Project consisting of 680 residential units and 454,500 SF of Commercial Development.

Plan Review/Staff Support City of Tracy – Development Engineering Services

Mr. Rodgers assisted with review and processing of the development applications for several residential in Tracy Hills Phase 1A, a 400-acre, 1,160-unit Master Plan Community. Mr. Rodgers also reviewed several commercial and industrial developments in the Tracy North East Industrial (NEI) Specific Plan.





27 | P a g e

Mr. Douglas Rodgers Selected Experience (continued)

Plan Review/Staff Support City of Pleasant Hill – Engineering Division

• Greyson Place Subdivision No. 9469 – a 38-lot single family residential infill subdivision, including grading and on-site & off-site public street, utility and storm drainage improvements.

• McKissick Lot Line Adjustment

Plan Review/Staff Support City of Emeryville – Public Works Department

• Marketplace Redevelopment Project – 15 acre Mixed Use Development with commercial, retail and residential, including extensive on-site & off-site public street, utility and storm drainage improvements and relocation of existing public street.

Plan Review/Staff Support City of Brentwood – Engineering Division

• Sellers Pointe – 84 lot residential development including 1/3-mile-long widening of adjacent existing public street with extension of sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage facilities.

C.I.P. Project Design Alameda County, California:

Provided consulting project management, civil engineering design and land surveying services to public agencies on numerous C.I.P. projects throughout western Alameda County. Project examples are as follows:

• Alameda County Public Works Agency Wilbeam Avenue Streetscape Improvements – 2,000 LF of public street reconstruction consisting of new curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement and storm drainage improvements

• Alameda County General Services Administration Social Services Agency Parking Lot – 50,000 sf parking lot reconstruction of new curbs, pavement and drainage facilities

• Castro Valley Sanitary District Redwood Road Sewer Rehabilitation – 1,800 LF of 12” sanitary sewer collector main reconstruction in existing arterial roadway

• Oro Loma Sanitary District

Grant Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation – 1,500 LF of 24” and larger sanitary sewer trunk main reconstruction in existing arterial roadway





28 | P a g e

BRUCE JACKS P.E. Senior Civil Engineer

Professional Registration: Civil Engineer - CA No. 23038

Management Highlights & Engineering Capabilities:

• Over 40 Years of Civil

Engineering, Land Surveying

and Land Planning experience

• Designing, overseeing the

production of a wide range of

civil plans and survey maps.

• Performing, directing and

reviewing all essential office

and field work in support of

engineering, surveying and

planning projects

• Plan review for public agencies

including engineering design

review of subdivision and

Capital Improvement Program

improvement plans

• Project management and

administration for public

agencies involving the review,

approval and permitting of both

private sector development and

public capital improvement

projects

• Project and QC Manager

• Tentative Map processing

• Specific Plans

• Master Plans

• Professional Services for:

Construction Support and Cost

Review

Mr. Bruce Jacks has over 40 years of experience in the field of civil engineering, including extensive work in land surveying, land use planning and entitlement processing in both the public and private sectors. Mr. Jacks’ experience includes technical design engineering, plan review, surveying and planning functions for a variety of residential, commercial and industrial site developments, as well as transportation and capital improvement projects. He managed topographic surveys, field inspections and provided construction management for large construction projects. Mr. Jacks currently assists MHCSD in review of improvement plans for land development projects.

Related experience: Assist local agencies in review and approval of developer requests for fee credits and reimbursement of oversize infrastructure in excess of developer’s fair share as specified in the Development Agreements, Finance Plans, and other project approvals. Scope description includes:

• Assist Finance Plan consultant to prepare benefit assessment spread allocation of major infrastructure based on acreage or equivalent dwelling unit.

• Assist local agency to determine methodology and timing of oversize infrastructure reimbursement schedule.

• Field review project at time of final inspection prior to acceptance of improvements.

• Review and recommend approval or modification of oversize infrastructure reimbursement request by developer.

• Provide mediation services to resolve contractor’s claim for additional work.

Project List:

• WestPark - Roseville, CA: A 702 single lot development within a 598-acre master planned community.

• Sun City Roseville - Roseville, CA: 2500-acre, 3100-unit Master Planned Community with 36 golf holes.

• Galleria Mall - Roseville, CA: 94-acre Regional Mall

• Sun City Lincoln Hills - Lincoln, CA: 2950-acre, 6400-unit Master Planned Community with 36 golf holes and Community Center

• Green Valley Assessment District - Fairfield, CA: A 650-acre multi-use community plan area at Green Valley in Fairfield, CA

• CBC Assessment District - Fairfield, CA: A 490-acre industrial development.





29 | P a g e

DAN FITZGERALD, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer

Professional Registration: Civil Engineer - CA No. 55552 Education: BS, UC BERKELEY MS, STANFORD UNIVERSITY Management Highlights & Capabilities

• 20+ Years of Civil Engineering experience

• Nearly 6 years of Municipal Engineering experience

• Experienced Project Engineer

• Managed Federal and SFPUC public-funded projects

Mr. Fitzgerald has more than 20+ years of engineering design and project management experience. He has strong technical, project management and construction expertise for civil engineering systems. He has managed engineering teams for the design and construction of a variety of projects at Department of the Navy facilities, US Army facilities and numerous private sector clients.

Mr. Fitzgerald has worked on a wide variety of projects involving public infrastructure improvements and management of reimbursement requests – Island Wide Redevelopment projects at Treasure and Mare Islands, Oakland Army Base Redevelopment, SFPUC Hetch-Hetchy water tunnels, local agency sewer lift station projects, local agency permitting and field inspection projects, as well as numerous private commercial and land development projects. His responsibilities include program development, project management, planning, permitting and field inspection and construction management.

Mare Island Redevelopment, City of Vallejo Mr. Fitzgerald is currently implementing private redevelopment of south Mare Island. Projects include significant master planning for upgrading storm drain, streets and fire supply. He d manages civil construction for the 35 acre residential project comprising 75 lots, ½ mile of new streets, utilities, a sewer pump station and new storm drain including a 2.5 acre bioretention area. Mr. Fitzgerald works closely with the City and Sanitary District to implement civil improvements consistent with regional policies.

City of San Francisco – Treasure Island Redevelopment Mr. Fitzgerald assisted the design team in implementing private redevelopment of Treasure Island. The ultimate development scope is to rebuild about 350 acres of streets and all utilities to support new commercial, hotels and residential development.

City of Oakland – Former Oakland Army Base Worked closely with the Design-Build Contractor, Architect, Civil Engineers and Geotechnical Professionals to prepare the overall scope and detailed schedule for the $500MM roadway, railway and site utility improvements at the former Army base.

City of Novato – Private Development

Olive Ridge Subdivision, Novato, California. Designed storm drain, sewer and joint trench including deep gravity pipelines in Bay Mud.





30 | P a g e

LINDA J. MONIZ Financial Analyst

Education: AS Degree – Accounting San Joaquin Delta College Highlights & Capabilities

• 17 years of Governmental Accounting experience

Selected Experience:

Ms. Moniz has 17+ years of highly technical and specialized accounting duties related to the implementation, administration, monitoring and reporting of Capital Improvement Projects, Finance and Implementation Plans and Capital-In-Lieu Fee revenue in Land Development.

Financial Analyst SNG & Associates, Inc. – Pleasanton, CA Ms. Moniz interpreted and tracked Financial Implementation Plans; calculated Capital-In-Lieu fees for development projects. Projects included, but were not limited to, the following:

• Cordes Ranch Specific Plan consisting of 1780 acres of commercial development

• Rocking Horse Subdivision, consisting of 59.1 acres of residential development

• Berg Avenue Specific Plan, consisting of 9.91 acres of residential development.

Accountant City of Tracy, Development and Engineering Services Interpreted and tracked Financial Implementation Plans; calculated Capital-In-Lieu fees for commercial and residential development projects and communicated fee requirements to developers; monitored the collection of Fees for accurate fund accounting; gathered and analyzed information from a variety of sources to prepare various Capital-In-Lieu Fee related revenue and expenditure reports for Land Development Engineers, Capital Project Engineers and Federal and State agencies; assisted Program Management Engineers with Developer Reimbursements and Tracking Systems. Projects included, but were not limited to, the following:

• Ellis Specific Plan consisting of 321 acres of residential and 180,000 SF of commercial development with a total program budget for CIP of $ 78,500,000.

• Northeast Industrial Specific Plan, Phases I & II, consisting of 870 acres of commercial development and a total program budget for CIP of $79,069,200.

• I-205 Corridor Specific Plan, consisting of 203 acres of residential and 405 acres of commercial development.

• Residential Areas Specific Plan, consisting of 1,480 acres, 7100-unit residential development in Tracy.





31 | P a g e

SHEETAL PARMAR Associate Engineer

Certifications

• EIT Certification

• AutoCad & AutoDesk 3D Certification

Education

Master of Science In Civil Engineering,

CSU Sacramento Bachelor of Engineering, Nirma Institute of Technology, India

Skills and Capabilities:

• Over 8 years of progressive work experience in Civil and Water Resources

• Outstanding AutoCad Skills in designing and preparing grading and drainage and utility design for land development projects

• Extensive transportation design experience

• Design of wastewater treatment plant and GIS entries and databases for Waste Water Treatment Plant

• Stormwater Management Plans

• TIF Program assistance

Ms. Sheetal Parmar has over 8 years of experience in increasingly responsible roles in land development and capital improvement projects. She has a strong background in design preparing grading and drainage plans, utility design (storm, sanitary, and water), integrating topographic surveys and architectural site plans into AutoCAD and Civil 3D, and developing storm water management plans.

On-Call Engineering Staff Support City of Livermore – Engineering Division

Ms. Parmar has been assisting staff at City of Livermore in Land Development and Capital Projects divisions for over two years. She has been providing support in plan review, processing of permits, preparation of conditions of approval, traffic engineering review and transportation permits, drafting and design support on several capital improvement projects. She assisted in reconciling TIF program fee credits and reimbursements for many development projects.

Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) BART Extension to San Jose Designed and provided technical support for roadway reconstruction projects including Kato Road, Dixon Landing Road and Warren Avenue street crossings.

I-580 HOV Lane Project / SR 12 Widening Project

Developed drainage design and performed pavement runoff calculations, pavement inlet design, Bioswale and culvert hydraulic calculations as part of the drainage design tasks for the highway I-580 widening project.

SR-89 Widening Project

Design sand vault and sand trap drainage system for SR-89 using Micro-station and AutoCAD. Also, performed hydrologic & hydraulic study, prepared drainage impact study, water quality study report, storm water data report and location hydraulic study report.

Copper Canyon

Responsible for providing design and technical support for site plan, grading and drainage/utility design (storm, sanitary, and water), Earth work calculation and developing storm water management plans.





32 | P a g e

HARMEET S. KALOTY Associate Engineer

Education:

Master of Science Geo-Technical Engineering Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology Patiala City, India

Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana City, India


• 11 + Years of Civil & Municipal Engineering and Project Management

• Land Development and Construction Management

• Capital Improvement Management

• Value Engineering

• Clean water & NPDES Compliance Review

• 3rd party engineering review

Mr. Kaloty has over 11 years of experience in civil engineering and project management services on numerous Public Works Capital Improvement and Private Development and Construction Projects.

He has substantial experience in providing land development plan review/plan checking services for the City of Tracy and the City of Fairfield. In addition, he has extensive experience in stormwater management and water resources projects including flood control design, watershed analysis, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, erosion and sedimentation control implementation and on-site review.

Tracy Hills: Mr. Kaloty has assisted in review of improvement plans, Final Maps, Conditions of Approval, Offsite Improvement Agreements, Subdivision Improvement Agreements, and other reports, and has worked closely with planning and engineering staff.

Cordes Ranch (International Park of Commerce): Mr. Kaloty assisted with review and processing of the development applications for several developments in the Cordes Ranch Specific Plan area. Mr. Kaloty checked onsite and offsite Improvement Plans for Cordes Ranch projects for conformance to City Design Standards, project Conditions of Approval, and City Master Plans.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory-Helios West, Berkeley, CA:

Assisted in the preparation of construction documents for this project that will construct a 40,000 SF multi-story building with high tech laboratories and offices. Project includes the construction of a new building, parking lot and associated landscape.

Lawrence National Laboratory-Seismic Upgrade, Berkeley, CA:

Assisted in the preparation of conceptual design report and final construction documents for building 74 and building 85. This project includes construction of new general-purpose laboratory and demolition of several buildings at the LBNL campus. Mr. Kaloty’s experience as a Project Engineer and Project Manager includes technical design engineering, plan review, surveying and planning functions for a variety of residential, commercial and industrial site developments, as well as transportation and capital improvement projects, including the preparation of street improvement plans, grading and drainage plans, stormwater quality control plans, utility plans, topographic surveys and performing field inspections of construction work.





33 | P a g e

Sanghamithra Devaram Junior Engineer

Certifications

• EIT Certification

Education

Master of Science In Civil Engineering,

State University of New York at Buffalo Bachelor of Science In Civil Engineering,

Osmania University, India

Skills and Proficiency:

• Exceptional working knowledge of Microsoft office, AutoCAD, Sketch-Up, and ArcGIS

• Experienced in project management software PRIMAVERA P6.

• Thorough in the analysis of structural design and cost estimates of pavements using Microsoft Excel.

• Strong communication, organizational, and analytical skills.

Ms. Mithra is a Junior Civil Engineer and has recently joined SNG. She works on Tenant Improvement projects, Building permits, Encroachment permits, Planning applications and drafting Staff reports and Improvement Agreements like SIA, OIA and DIA. Apart from this she also reviews Grading and Improvement plans for subdivision lots and street improvement plans. She has experience as a part of her academic projects in desiging a highway section in AUTOCAD.

City of Dublin – Public Works.

• Reviewed various Tenant Improvements projects for commercial

buildings in City of Dublin.

• Reviewed Building permits for Developments and Additions for

various residential units.

• Reviewed Encroachment Permit plans for any work in public right-

of-way for both commercial and residential units.

• Worked on Site Development Review projects and planning

applications plan set.

• Prepared Conditions of Approval for commercial and residential

projects.

City of Tracy.

• Reviewed Grading and Improvement plans for Minor Subdivision

Improvements (Brookview West Tract 3965 on Tracy Blvd).

• Reviewed Final Parcel map for NEI Silva Property on South-East

corner of Grant Line Road and Chrisman Road intersection.

• Preparing staff reports, resolutions, SIA, OIA and DIA for Tracy Hills

phase 1A Villages.

• Prepared aerial exhibits using AUTOCAD for proposed Multi

Generation Center locations.

City of Pleasant Hill.

• Reviewed site improvement plans for a senior housing center in

City of Pleasant Hill.

• Reviewed Pleasant Hill Road Conceptual Streetscape, Vesting

Tentative map – Reliez Terrace.





34 | P a g e


CONSENT ITEM 8.8 ATTACHMENT C

1229486-2

BEFORE THE MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

RESOLUTION

R-2018-60

RESOLUTION OF THE MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TO

AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH

HARRIS & ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE COST CERTIFICATION AUDIT SERVICES

WHEREAS, Mountain House Developers, Inc., has entered into a Master Acquisition and

Reimbursement Agreement (MARA), as well as Project Acquisition Agreements (PAA) for

Utilities and Project Reimbursement Agreements (PRA) for TIF and CFF facilities; and

WHEREAS, the Mountain House Community Services District (MHCSD) issued a

Request for Proposals for Professional Construction and Other Related Cost Certification Audit

Services on August 28, 2018 for cost certification audit services related to TIF, CFF and Utility

projects constructed by MHD and Mountain House Investors, Inc., (MHI) in Mountain House; and

WHEREAS, Harris & Associates has been ranked as the most qualified firm based on

qualifications and cost for these services; and

WHEREAS, MHD and MHI have agreed to reimburse MHCSD for all consultant costs

related to the final cost certification audit provided by Harris & Associates.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mountain House Community

Services District Board of Directors hereby approves up to $330,270 for the Cost Certification

Audit services and authorizes the General Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with

Harris & Associates for these services; and authorize the General Manager to extend the contract, if

required and warranted, for an additional two years, for an amount up to an additional $500,000 for

the extension term for future project cost certification services based on the approved hourly fee

schedule included the original agreement with Harris for Cost Certification Audit services.

CONSENT ITEM 8.8 ATTACHMENT D

1229486-2

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th

day of October, 2018 by the following vote of the Board of

Directors of the Mountain House Community Services District, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

________________________________

MANUEL MORENO, PRESIDENT

Board of Directors of the Mountain House

Community Services District, County of San Joaquin,

State of California

ATTEST:

NICOLE M. F. ADAMO

Deputy Secretary of the Board of Directors

of the Mountain House Community

Services District, County of San

Joaquin, State of California

By: ___________________________

CONSENT ITEM 8.8 ATTACHMENT D

mountain house community services district staff …

Documents