mpl2014-00025 hyatt place downtown - orlando...page 5 mpl2014-00025— hyatt place downtown...

Updated: October 15, 2014

Applicant

Steven Skelley, HP Orlando Downtown, LLC

Project Planner

Karl Wielecki, AICP

Owner

TSLF Church Street Develop-ment, LLC

HYATT PLACE - DOWNTOWN

S U M M A RY

Property Location: 225 S. Garland Avenue, at the northeast corner of South and Garland Streets) (+/- 1.67 ac) Applicant’s Request: The applicant is re-questing Master Plan approval to develop a 15-story, 212-room Hyatt Place hotel on the south portion of the subject property. The project will include 5,192 sq. ft. of meeting space, a 462-space parking garage, and provi-sion for a future SunRail platform. The subject property is zoned AC-3A/T/MA and AC-3A/T/HP/MA, with a Future Land Use classification of Downtown Metropolitan Activity Center. It is in the Central Business

District. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the Master Plan, subject to conditions in this staff report. Public Comment: Courtesy notices were mailed to property owners within 300 ft. of the subject property the week of October 6, 2014. As of the mail-out of the staff report, staff has received no comments from the public relative to the Master Plan request.

Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board October 21, 2014

MPL2014-00025 Item # 20

Location Map Subject Site

MPL2014-00025— Hyatt Place Downtown

FUTURE LAND USE MAP

C U R R E N T Z O N I N G M A P

Project Description and Context The applicant is requesting Master Plan approval to develop a 212-room, 15-story Hyatt Place hotel with a 462-space parking garage at 225 S. Garland Avenue. The 1.7-acre subject property is at the northeast corner of South Street and Garland Avenue and includes the Church Street Ballroom. It is currently developed with the 43,106 sq. ft. Church St. Ballroom and 80 paved parking spaces. The hotel would be developed on the south half of the site adjacent to the ballroom. The ground floor of the hotel would include guest seating and dining space, next to the lobby. No formal restaurant or retail space is proposed. A potential future “Phase 2” of this project would involve redevelopment of the northern portion of the subject property (the ball-room site) including a possible second parking garage connecting to the parking garage included in the current development phase. While the applicant has no plans for Phase 2 at this time, eventual redevelopment of the northern piece will require Master Plan review. Previous Actions • 1886— Property platted as part of W.A. Patrick’s Addition to the Town of Orlando

• 1901—Church Street ballroom initial construction

• 1993– Church Street ballroom redevelopment, including 83 paved parking spaces

• Aug. 2014– ARB conducted courtesy review

Master Plan Criteria (LDC Section 65.335)

The Municipal Planning Board and City Council shall consider the following factors in their review of Master Plan applications: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of the use and all other requirements of the LDC.

2. Growth Management Plan (GMP). The consistency of the proposal with all applicable policies of the City's adopted GMP.

3. Use and District Requirements. The proposal must conform to the requirements of the zoning district(s) in which it is located and, where applicable, to the requirements of Chapter 58 for the particular use or activity under consideration.

4. Performance and Design Regulations. The proposal must conform to all applicable performance and design regulations of Chapters 58, 60, 61, and 62.

5. Public Facilities and Services. Will necessary public facilities (both on- and off-site), such as transportation, sanitation, water, sewer, drainage, emergency services, education, recreation, etc. be adequate to serve the proposed use.

Conformance with Growth Management Plan and Zoning

The subject property is designated Downtown Activity Center (D-AC) on the Official Future Land Use Map and zoned AC-3A/T/MA and AC-3A/T/HP/MA. The D-AC Future Land Use classification applies to all adjacent properties.


PR O J E C T AN A LY S I S

T A B L E 1 - P R O J E C T C O N T E X T Direction Future Land Use Zoning Adjacent Uses

North

Downtown Activity Center

Church Street Ex-change

East


South


FDOT Property—SunRail and CNL garage

West


AC-3A/T/HP/MA (Downtown Activity Cen-ter/Trad. City/Hist. Pres./Major Attraction)

AC-3A/T (Downtown Activity Cen-ter/Traditional City)

AC-3A/T/MA (Downtown Activity Cen-ter/Trad. City/Major Attraction)

AC-3A/T (Downtown Activity Cen-ter/Traditional City)

Interstate 4

CSX and SunTrust


Floor Area Ratio (FAR). The proposed FAR for this project, as measured off of the entire 1.7 acre subject property, is 2.59 (Maximum allowed FAR in the AC-3A/T district is 3.0.) Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR). The proposed ISR is 95%. AC-3A/T district limits ISR to 95%.

These development standards are summarized in Table 2 below.

Setbacks.

This property is a corner lot, with the following yard designations:

front: along South Street (the shorter of the two street frontages) street-side: along Garland Ave. side: along CSX railroad rear: north property line

Required and proposed setbacks are given in Table 3.

As shown, the front and street-side yard setbacks exceed the maximums allowed. However, the larger front yard building setback allows for the provision of a full 15 ft. sidewalk. With regard to the greater street-side yard set-back, the guest drop off along this frontage acts as a secon-dary “service street” parallel to Garland Avenue. Setting the building back from Garland allows vehicular maneuvering to occur on site instead of in the right-of-way. Finally, there will be a 16 ft. canopy from the west edge of the building to within +/- 15 ft. of the property line.

There will be a +/- 11 ft. separation between the north wall of the Hyatt Place and the existing stairs on the exterior south wall of the ballroom, and roughly 22 ft. between the hotel and ballroom buildings.

Transportation

Access. The sole access for this property to the City’s roadway system will be via 2 driveways onto Garland Ave. The northern-most driveway will provide the primary access to the parking garage and service areas. The southern driveway will be right-in only and will facilitate valet service, taxis, and temporary parking for initial guest check-in. The two driveways will be connected internally.

Transportation Improvements. The subject property is adjacent to Interstate 4 and will be significantly impacted by the Ultimate I-4 Project, scheduled to begin in 2015. This work will include widening of I-4, as well as changes to South St in the vicinity of the hotel. No other significant


Table 2—Development Standards

Phase Acreage Use Sq. Ft./Dwellin

g Units

Density

(dwelling units per acre)

FAR

(floor area ratio)

Building Height ISR (impervious sur-

face ratio)

Minimum /Maximum

Proposed Minimum /Maximum

Proposed Minimum /Maximum

Proposed Maxi-mum

Pro-posed

1 1.67 Hotel 144,975 N/A N/A 0 .75 to 3.0 2.59 Per FAA 221 ft. 0.95 0.95

Table 3—Setback and Landscaping Requirements

Use or Phase Yard Building Setbacks

Minimum Proposed

Hotel

Front– South Street 0 ft. to 5 ft. +/- 8 ft.

Side– CSX railroad 0 or 3 ft./25 ft. 5 ft.

Street-side– Garland 0 ft. to 15 ft. +/-30 ft.

Rear– north property line 10 ft. / no max. 0 ft. (existing)


transportation projects are scheduled or pro-grammed in the area. Bicycle/ Pedestrian Facilities. Sidewalks exist on the east side of Garland Av and both sides of South St adjacent to the subject prop-erty. The closest bike facility is the Gertrude’s Trail mixed-use path, which terminates 450 ft north of this parcel. Parking. Within this 15-story building is a 462-space, six-level parking garage, on floors two through seven. There will be 310 spaces for retail on floors two through five, and 151 spaces for the hotel on floors six and seven. Sec. 61.342 “Downtown Parking Area requirements” specifies the following standards, as noted in Table 4. Table 5 from the Transportation Impact Study submitted by HDR illustrates the variety of transit options available near the sub-ject property. Public Transit. The site plan notes a “possible future train platform” for the SunRail com-muter train along the CSX railroad. The platform width at its minimum is 10 ft., measured between the building wall and columns along the tracks. With this project, the plat-form will be built only as a corridor and not as the SunRail station. The existing SunRail train station for south-bound trains will remain in its current location south of South Street. It will be moved to the sub-ject property only upon redevelop-ment of the Church Street Ballroom, when sufficient width will be avail-able to relocate the station. Until then, staff is asking the applicant to fence off/secure the platform area to prevent vagrancy.

Trip Generation:

The subject parcel is currently used as a surface parking lot with approxi-mately 80 stalls. The hotel is ex-pected to use 151 parking stalls, gen-erating 1,507 daily trips and 111 PM peak hour vehicle trips after a 10% reduction for transit and other non-automotive trips. The proposed park-ing garage will be constructed with

PR O J E C T AN A LY S I S Table 4 - Parking Requirements (per LDC Sect. 61.322, Figure 27)

Phase I uses Area (sq. ft.)

or Rooms

Ratio (Min.—Max.)

Spaces Required

Hotel 212 0.35 / room — 3

spaces/1000 sq. ft. 74-435

Ballroom 43,106 0 (exempt Downtown) -

3/1000 0-129

Total Provided 462

Total Required 74-564

5

approximately 310 more stalls than will be needed by the hotel patrons. This additional parking will serve the second phase of the project and be available for public use for drivers accessing retail, office and other uses in the Church St, Amway Center, and Performing Arts Center areas. Estimation of the additional trips associated with this surplus parking is speculative, but for the analysis is assumed to be twice the hotel trip generation (3,000 daily and 220 pm peak). The overall expected number of trips entering and exiting the garage during PM peak hours is 333 vehicles with a nearly equal balance between the inbound and out-bound movements. Urban Design /Appearance Review Board

This project is within the Downtown Development Board (DDB) Community Redevelopment Area (CRA), requiring review by the Appearance Review Board for all new construction. ARB provided a courtesy review of this project in August 2014. Final approval of the architectural elevations and development plans is still required.

Streetscape.

A 15 ft. wide sidewalk is required along both street frontages, to consist of a nine ft. wide pedestrian clear zone plus a six ft. streetscape furniture and street tree zone. Streetlights will be double acorn type with LEDs and shields. Tree wells will be six ft. by nine ft., with high-rise oaks along South St.

Signage. The subject property is within the Downtown Core sub-district of the Downtown Special Sign District (Sec. 64.400). Signage for this project is thus subject to this section of the Land Development Code and the general applicable requirements of Ch. 64– On-Site Signs.

School Review

This project does not propose any residential dwelling units, so no OCPS review is required.

Stormwater

Stormwater will be handled through an underground vault system.




A E R I A L A N D S I T E P H O T O S

View from southeast


S I T E P H O T O S

View from north

Ballroom exterior stairway, view to west

View to north of east property line

View from south

View to west of south property line

View from southwest


O V E R A L L S I T E D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N


D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N /1 S T F L O O R P L A N


N O R T H A N D S O U T H BU I L D I N G E L E VAT I O N S


E A S T A N D W E S T BU I L D I N G E L E VAT I O N S


S O U T H E A S T A N D S O U T H W E S T R E N D E R I N G S


F I N D I N G S

Staff finds that the proposed Master Plan for Hyatt Place Downtown is consistent with the requirements for approval of Master Plan applications contained in Section 65.335 of the Land Development Code (LDC):

1. The Master Plan is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Plan. 2. The Master Plan is consistent with the City’s Land Development Code. 3. The proposed development meets the standards for development in the AC-3A/T zoning districts. 4. Existing public facilities and services are adequate to serve the proposed development.

Staff Recommendation

Based on the information provided in the staff report and the findings noted above, staff recommends approval of the Hyatt Place Downtown Master Plan, subject to the conditions in this staff report.

C O N D I T I O N S O F A P P R O VA L - R E Q U I R E D Land Development 1. Land Use & Zoning - The property shall be developed in accordance with the Downtown Activity Center FLU and correspond-

ing AC-3A/T zoning district.

2. Code Compliance - Except as provided herein, the proposed development is subject to all codes and ordinances of the State of Florida, City of Orlando, and all other applicable regulatory agencies. Any applicable state or federal permits must also be obtained before commencing development.

3. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) - ISR is limited to 95% in the default underlying AC-3A/T zoning district.

4. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) - FAR is limited to 3.0 in the underlying AC-3A/T zoning district. The plans show an FAR of 2.59.

5. Approved Site Plan - The Master Plan is valid only for the site plan and building elevations shown in this staff report and any changes necessary as a condition of this staff report. The Master Plan is not transferable to another property. 6. Master Plan Expiration - Upon approval of the Master Plan by City Council, a building permit shall be obtained for the work

requiring the master plan within two years of the master plan approval. If the applicant does not receive the building permit within two (2) years, then the master plan is no longer valid and the applicant must reapply for a master plan if the applicant wishes to proceed with a development requiring a master plan. If the building permit for the work requiring the master plan expires before a certificate of occupancy or certificate of completion is issued for the work requiring the master plan, then the master plan is no longer valid and the applicant must reapply for a master plan if the applicant wishes to proceed with a development requiring a master plan. However, the Planning Official may extend this time limit for one period of up to 12 months for good cause shown upon written application filed 30 days prior to the expiration date.

7. A public access easement shall be provided over the SunRail platform at ground level. (See condition #3, pg. 18.) 8. Redevelopment of the ballroom site (Phase 2) shall undergo Master Plan review.

Urban Design

The Community Planning Studio recommends approval of the project, with the following conditions placed on the design of the project.

APPEARANCE REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL—This project is located in the DDB/CRA Overlay District, which re-quires review and approval by the Appearance Review Board (ARB) . New construction is required to receive an ARB Cer-tificate of Appearance Approval prior to issuance of building permits.

STREETSCAPE

a. Design Guidelines - All streetscape shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and specifica-tions of the Downtown Orlando Streetscape Guidelines.

b. Maintenance – Unless approved thru a separate agreement the City shall only maintain those portions of the streetscape within the public right-of-way or City Services easement. The City shall not be responsible for nor maintain any section of streetscape not constructed in accordance with the Downtown Orlando Streetscape Design Guidelines.

c. Minimum Width - The streetscape on South Street and S. Garland Avenue shall be a minimum of 15-feet wide from back-of-curb and shall provide a 6-foot Streetscape Furniture and Street Tree Zone [Furniture Zone] combined with an


C O N D I T I O N S O F A P P R O VA L - R E Q U I R E D (C O N T ’ D ) unencumbered 9-foot Pedestrian Clear Zone.

d. Streetlights—all streetlights on South Street and Garland Avenue shall be double acorn lights with LED lights and shields.

e. South Street— The sidewalk from back-of-curb to back of sidewalk shall be Lawrenceville brick to match the sidewalk treatment on the east side of the railroad tracks on South Street.

f. South Garland Avenue — The streetscape treatment on S. Garland shall be Streatscape Treatment 4 with a concrete win-dow pane pattern to include Troweled edges and medium bromm surface perpendicular to the centerline of the street..

g. S. Garland Pavers — The Applicant is proposing brick paver bands that extend from their property into the S. Garland sidewalk area. Those brick pavers shall be Lawrenceville brick to be consistent with the Downtown Streetscape Guide-lines material requirements.

h. Tree Wells — Tree wells on South Street and S. Garland shall be 6-feet by 9-feet.

i. Street Trees — The street trees on South Street shall be high-rise oaks.

j. Structural Soil - To minimize root damage to adjacent pavement areas structural soil or a Planning Official approved equivalent shall be installed around all canopy street trees consistent with Detail 3.4-O and 3.4-P of the Downtown Streetscape Guidelines.

k. Root Barriers - Where a canopy tree is installed within 10 feet of any existing or proposed underground utility line, a root barrier 2’ in height and at least 9’ in length shall be installed along the underground utility or the utility may be wrapped in the root barrier.

l. Crosswalks – The 15-foot minimum streetscape zone from back of curb shall be the priority in all instances. Crosswalks at driveways and curb cuts shall be raised to be at the same grade as the sidewalk adjacent to the driveway in order to clearly define the pedestrian area. Driveway slope transitions from the street grade to the sidewalk grade shall occur in the 6-foot Streetscape Furniture Zone. Crosswalk surfaces shall be treated with the same streetscape treatment materials and finishes as the sidewalk surface, or a material, color or texture that contrasts with the vehicular use area. Reflective paint alone is not acceptable, however may be used in conjunction with pavers or other surfaces to outline the pedestrian path for night time safety.

m. Vehicle Drop-Off and Pick-Up Areas – The 15-foot minimum streetscape zone from back of curb shall be the priority in all instances. Off-Street Vehicle Drop-Off and Pick-Up Areas shall occur outside the dedicated 15-foot Streetscape zone, with a knee wall of up to 3 ft. in height along the inside edge of the buffer, with additional plantings in the remainder of the area against the sidewalk.

SERVICE AREAS, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, UTILITIES, VENTING

a. Service Area/Utilities - All utilities, trash disposal pick-up, and other maintenance facilities shall be located on the inte-rior of the parking garage or building, and not adjacent to the pedestrian sidewalks or streetscape zones.

b. Mechanical Equipment - All ground and roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened and meet the conditions of the Land Development Code [LDC] including transformers, traffic signal control boxes, and other above ground util-ity structures and cabinets.

c. Traffic Signal Cabinet — The traffic signal cabinet on the northeast corner of Garland and south shall be relocated to be outside the sidewalk area and screened on three sides with a vegetative buffer.

d. Telecommunications Equipment Screening - Buildings should be designed to accommodate for future placement of tele-communications equipment (including any communications equipment required by the Police Department). It is recom-mend that screening areas be designed into rooftop areas so that the placement and screening of potential telecommuni-cations equipment does not become an afterthought.

e. Streetscape - In no instance shall any above grade transformer, utility box, traffic signal control box, lighting fixture, utility pole or backflow preventer be located in the 9-foot Pedestrian Clear Zone.

f. Venting & Exhaust - All restaurant venting and restaurant exhaust shall be directed to the roof of the building; shall not be visible from the public right-of-way and; is not permitted on any façade of the building. All other exterior venting and exhaust for mechanical and utility rooms shall be a minimum of 12 ft. above grade; shall be designed and integrated into the building so as to be seamless with the overall architecture of the building and shall not vent over pedestrian areas.

g. Backflow Preventer - backflow preventer/s shall be located so as not to be directly visible from the right-of-way and should be screened from view where necessary.


C O N D I T I O N S O F A P P R O VA L - R E Q U I R E D ( C O N T ’ D ) g. Fencing - Any fencing on the site shall be an open, CPTED-approved fence, such as aluminum or wrought-iron picket

fencing. Chain link fencing is prohibited (except for screened construction fencing).

h. Appearance Approval — Exterior venting and rooftop mechanical equipment design and location shall be included in the ARB Final Review submittal.

ARCHITECTURE

a. Additional Architectural Fenestration— Additional architectural fenestration and detailing shall be incorporated into the building design in order to make the structure at this prominent downtown gateway location more iconic, unique and dramatic in the Orlando skyline. Enhanced treatments could include but are not limited to additional trim and mullion detailing, the addition of recesses, projections or undulations to the building facades and rooflines, additional architec-tural features such as canopies, shade screens, eyebrows, fins and/or additional variations in materials and colors. Final building elevations will be reviewed and approved as part of the Final ARB Major Review prior to issuance of building permits.

b. Architectural Lighting— Significant architectural lighting shall be incorporated into the final building design in order to enhance the building’s night time appearance. Final lighting plans will be reviewed and approved in conjunction with the ARB Final Review prior to issuance of building permits.

c. Parking Garage Cladding — The Applicant shall include additional fenestration into the garage façades to break up the mass of the louvered sections. Additional fenestration could include but is not limited to a combination of treatments such as a contrasting mullion system. All floors of the parking shall have a minimum 36” tall opaque wall to block head-light glare from spilling out of the parking garage space.

d. Screen Wall — The north façade of the ground floor parking area shall include a minimum 36” opaque screen wall be-tween the parking garage and 10-foot pedestrian path to separate the two uses and to screen headlight glare from spilling into the pedestrian path. Periodic openings may be provided in the wall for enhanced security, subject to ARB approval.

e. 10-foot Pedestrian Connection to Garland — The 10-foot pedestrian path shall include pedestrian level lighting to in-crease the security and comfort for pedestrians after dark. The decorative lighting shall be incorporated into the façade of the building in order to avoid adding vertical obstructions in the pedestrian area. Periodic openings may be provided in the wall for enhanced security.

f. Potential Future SunRail Platform — Until the train platform is in operation the platform area shall be secured with a CPTED fence such as aluminum picket. This will discourage loitering and vagrancy in the platform area until the plat-form is operational. The large mass of the west wall of the platform area shall be enhanced with murals, art panels or a similar treatment in order to break up the mass of the wall and to provide a more enlivened passenger waiting area. Granite cladding that matches the Garland Avenue column cladding shall be added to the columns on the SunRail plat-form.

g. Materials — Durable materials such as stone, brick, pre-cast, etc. are encouraged at the ground level. Stucco may be appropriate on upper levels, but not at the base of any building. A granite watertable base 24 to 36 inches tall shall be added to all exterior walls of the hotel site including the west wall of the SunRail Platform.

h. Transparency – The ground floor building walls of all structures facing a right-of-way shall contain a minimum of 15% of transparent materials, located between 3 and 7 feet measured from ground level. Reflective glass and glass block are not counted as transparent materials. Transparent materials on walls not parallel to the street and on doors shall not be counted toward the minimum transparency requirement.

i. Glazing - All glass at the ground level shall be clear. Minimum light transmittance shall be 80%. High performance or Low-E glass may be considered as an alternative with a minimum transmittance of 60%. No windows shall be dry-walled, or have permanent partitions installed on the interior to block natural surveillance. Tinted or reflective glass shall not be permitted. Spandrel glass shall not be counted toward transparency.

j. Exterior Doors – At a minimum a 4-inch by 6-inch view panel shall be provided in all exterior solid doors to provide visibility for entering and exiting pedestrians.

k. Stormwater Run-off - Water shall not spill out onto the sidewalk or plaza areas from any downspout, nor shall any downspout project into the public ROW. Canopies shall incorporate downspouts or other rain water management sys-tems to prevent water spill onto the pedestrian path or ROW.

l. Final Appearance Approval – Prior to submittal for a building permit final architectural elevations and perspective ren-derings shall be submitted for ARB Final Review.


C O N D I T I O N S O F A P P R O VA L - R E Q U I R E D ( C O N T ’ D ) m. Model - Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a physical 1"= 100' model of the principal structures of the PD

should be provided for the DDB/CRA model. If available, submit a 3D virtual model in the City of Orlando's digital for-mat for the Virtual Orlando model (See CAD Standards City of Orlando for format).

LIGHTING

a. Lighting Standards - Site lighting shall comply with the City’s lighting ordinance [Ord. 2013-73].

b. Parking Garage Lighting - Interior fixtures must be shielded to prevent light spilling from the garage. Wattage shall not exceed 400 watts per bulb.

c. Security Lighting - Security lighting shall not be substituted for parking or pedestrian area lighting fixtures. Security lighting is restricted to lighting service, storage, loading and other similar uses. Security lighting shall not extend be-yond the fascia or roofline of any building.

d. Light Shields - Shields for security lighting shall be similar in color with the surface to which the fixture is attached.

e. Other Areas - Lighting under awnings, canopies, and porte-cocheres should be recessed. If not recessed, the box type or other lighting fixture shall be opaque on all sides (no light shall emanate from any side of the fixture).

f. Pedestrian Areas - Lighting fixtures shall be decorative in appearance, style and finish and shall not exceed 15’ in height.

g. Final Appearance Approval – Proposed lighting fixtures and photometrics shall be provided for the ARB Final Review.

SIGNAGE

All building identification signage shall be included in the ARB Final Review submittal for final approval, including the high-rise sign.

Parks - A permit is required for the removal of or encroachment onto any tree 4-inch caliper or larger in size.

Transportation Impact Fees

1. Any new construction, change in use, addition, or redevelopment of a site or structure shall be subject to a review for Trans-portation Impact Fees. The Transportation Impact Fee will be due at the time of building permit issuance, subject to change upon final permit plan review. For a copy of the complete ordinance or impact fee rate chart, you may reference our website at: http://www.cityoforlando.net/planning/Transportation/ifees.htm

2 Any exemptions or credits against the Transportation Impact Fee must be reviewed prior to permit issuance. All Transpor-tation Impact Fee Credits shall be initiated and processed by the Transportation Impact Fee Coordinator. Credit shall be available for the previous use located on the subject site.

3 The applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 59, the Concurrency Management Ordinance, to ensure that all public facilities and services are available concurrent with the proposed development, and that the potential impacts on public facilities and services are mitigated. All new construction, changes in use, additions or redevelopment are required to submit a Concurrency Management application as a part of the building plan review process. A Concur-r e n c y M a n a g e m e n t a p p l i c a t i o n i s a v a i l a b l e o n t h e C i t y ' s w e b s i t e : http://www.cityoforlando.net/permits/forms/concurrency.htm

Transportation Planning 1. Bicycle Parking: Per City Code Sec. 61.333, three (3) long-term and seven (7) short-term bicycle parking spaces

shall be provided for employees and others to use. At least one double sided bike rack should be placed near the en-trance to the retail use on the ground floor, for use by the general public. The remaining 8 required spaces may be lo-cated within the parking garage. In all instances, the racks shall be located so as not to create conflicts with pedestri-ans or other vehicles.

2. Future Sunrail Platform: The area on the east side of the building designated for a future SunRail platform shall be designed with consideration of the following: A. Access points on the north and south shall be ADA compliant. B. No obstruction may be built in Phase 1 that precludes the platform from extending into Phase 2. C. Provisions shall be


C O N D I T I O N S O F A P P R O VA L - R E Q U I R E D ( C O N T ’ D ) made to prevent the area from being used prior to construction of the actual platform.

3. Transit Connection. The subject property is uniquely positioned to benefit from growing transit connections. The eastern boundary of the subject property borders the railroad right-of-way for the region's SunRail commuter rail sys-tem. The existing northbound station platform is directly across the rail line from the subject property (on the east side of the railroad), while the current southbound station platform is south of the subject property across South St. (with the platform on the west side of the railroad). Ideally, the northbound and southbound station platforms would be to-gether, north of South St. - with part of the southbound platform occupying an approximately 18'-wide area running the length of the eastern boundary of the property; directly across the railroad bed from the northbound station. As a condition of this master plan approval, the property owner must convey an easement to the City for the purpose of building, maintaining, and operating a rail station and platform, including necessary appurtenances such as lights, shelters, benches, ticketing, passenger waiting areas, pedestrian paths, vending, and other public goods and services typically associated with public rail transit or any other multimodal facility / pedestrian way. The instrument of con-veyance shall be in a form and of a substance approved by the City Attorney and must be conveyed prior to the issu-ance of the first building permit for vertical construction under this master plan. The precise easement area is subject to further refinement before the conveyance is made but shall be at least 18 ft. in width from the existing rail right-of-way to the east of the subject property and shall run the entire length of the subject property from its southern bound-ary at the South St. right-of-way to the northern property boundary approximately 264 ft. away. The property owner is not responsible for financial contribution towards the eventual design, construction, and operation of the multimodal facility as a condition of this master plan approval.

4. Information for Compliance with #3 above. The City Services Easement dedication forms are posted on the City’s website. Please go to www.cityoforlando.net/permits and click on the left menu “Forms, Fees & Information”. From there, select “General Documents” and the appropriate City Services Easement document. Return this document to the Transportation Plans Examiner along with the legal description of the easement and the sketch of description of the easement (Exhibit A). This document will be sent to the City Legal Department for review as to form and legality. When it is in the approvable state, signed and sealed, it must be recorded at Orange County Public Records by the Owner/Applicant. Upon receiving a copy of the Recorded Document(s), the condition will be made “Met”. Alterna-tively, if the Owner/Applicant wishes, the permit may be issued with a hold placed on the final inspection until the required document(s) are approved and recorded.

5. Commercial Plans Submittal Requirements: The submitted construction plans shall include a site plan (to engineer-ing scale) and show the following: property lines, legal description, curbs, street pavement edges, public sidewalks, loading/unloading areas, parking spaces, solid waste location, etc. (Please see the Commercial Plans Submittal Check-list: http://www.cityoforlando.net/permits). Reference Orlando Land Development Code (LDC), Chapters 60, 61, and 65, and the Engineering Standards Manual (ESM).

6. Work Within Road R-O-W Requirements: For any construction work planned or required within a public right-of-way or City sidewalk easement adjacent to a public right-of-way (including but not limited to: irrigation, drainage, utility, cable, sidewalk, driveway, road construction/reconstruction or landscaping), the owner/applicant shall submit the following: A. Maintenance of traffic plans (M.O.T.) (For more information/detailed requirements contact the Of-fice of Special Events & Permits at 407-246-3704). B. Roadway plans including paving, grading, pavement markings and signage (Contact the Permitting Transportation Engineering Reviewer at 407-246-3079 for details). C. A copy of all required County and State permits (If permits are pending attach a copy of the application)

7. FDOT Approval/Permits Requirements: The proposed improvements, located within the Garland Ave right-of-way, require Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) permits and approvals. The owner/applicant shall provide a copy of the permits and approval (or letter of intent of approval) from the approving agency to the City of Orlando prior to final permit/construction plans approval. *FDOT Permitting: 407-858-5900

8. Parking Garage Design: Dimensions for all parking stalls, drive aisles, and turning radii within the parking garage shall conform to all applicable provisions of the City Code and Engineering Standards Manual. Current Code requires minimum stall dimensions of 9 ft by 18.5 ft, and 2-way aisle width of 24 ft. Stalls located adjacent to lateral obstruc-tions shall have a minimum width of 10 ft.

9. Dumpster/Compactor: Garbage containers shall be located to allow direct access without requiring excessive ma-neuvering or backing up more than 50 ft.

Transportation Engineering

1. The access from the retail elevators at the ground level to the path that leads to the sidewalk must meet ADA requirements


C O N D I T I O N S O F A P P R O VA L - R E Q U I R E D ( C O N T ’ D ) for both longitudinal and cross slope.

Engineering/Zoning

The development and future construction plans shall take into consideration the I-4 Ultimate widening. The Wastewater Division has been made aware of utility relocations throughout the I-4 corridor. This project may lie within an area where relocation of the City's wastewater facilities may be required. A study of the capacity of the City's wastewater facilities serving this area is under-way. The results of the study may recommend upgrades to the City wastewater facilities in this area in addition to relocation of facilities in conjunction with the I-4 Ultimate widening. The Developer's design team shall coordinate sanitary sewer capacity and connection with the Wastewater Division and the I-4 Ultimate design/build team.

Permitting

1. Any construction within the State right of-way of will require Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) ap-proval/permit prior to construction.

2. At the time of development, the owner/developer is required to apply an on-site inspection fee that is a percentage of the cost of the on-site improvements, excluding the building, in accordance with City Land Development Code, Section 65.604.

3. Any construction within the CSX Railroad right of-way of will require Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) approval/permit prior to construction.

4. A valid survey is required to be submitted with the Final Plat and Engineering Plans that is signed and sealed by a license PSM. All future elevation shown on a boundary/topographic survey shall use the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88).

5. Construction activities including clearing, grading and excavating activities shall obtain an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, except: operations that result in the disturbance of one acre total land area which are not part of a larger common plan of development or sale.

6. The owner/developer is required to design and construct an on-site storm water system in accordance with the Orlando Urban Storm Water Management Manual and the approved Master Drainage Plan. Approval from St. John River Water Management District is required. The system is to be privately owned and maintained.

7. At the time of development, the owner/developer is required to apply an on-site inspection fee that is a percentage of the cost of the on-site improvements, excluding the building, in accordance with City Land Development Code, Section 65.604.

8. In accordance with City Code Section 28.6 (f) 1-3, the Office of Permitting Services is authorized to make a determination of approval/disapproval of refuse container sites. Approval/disapproval of the use of commercial hand pick-up of refuse from any non-residential entity shall be determined solely by the Refuse Collection Bureau Staff.

9. All new construction, change in use, additions, or redevelopments are required to submit a Concurrency Management ap-plication as a part of the building plan review process.

10. See Chapter 64 Orlando Land Development Code for sign requirements and regulations. Separate permit applications are required for signs.

11. The property must be replatted prior to building permit issuance. Contact the Land Development Section of the City Plan-ning Bureau at (407) 246-2269 to make an appointment for a pre-application conference.

12. Any construction within the right of-way of will require Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) approval/permit prior to construction.

13. The City Council Adopted the Engineering Standards Manual (ESM), Fourth Edition on March 9, 2009. All plans must conform to the ESM and all construction must be accomplished in accordance to the ESM.

Fire Permits

1. Every building constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of access roadways with all-weather surface of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width, adequate roadway turning radius, capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus, and having a minimum vertical clearance of 13 ft. 6 in. [NFPA 1: 18.2.3]

2. TRC fire code review is preliminary in nature, and is intended to expose or prevent evident design deficiencies with State and City Fire Codes. The design will be reviewed in detail for State and City Fire Code compliance at the time of permit applica-tion.

3. Underground main contractor must apply for a Fire permit for the installation or modification of any underground mains serv-ing fire hydrants and/or fire protection systems prior to any installation. If the water distribution system and fire hydrants are located in a right-of-way or recorded easement and owned/installed/maintained by the water purveyor, we will only require installation to the water purveyor's standards for underground components and connections. However, hydrants must be in compliance with hydrant spacing, location, distribution, color coding, and needed fire flow minimums as specified in City Fire Code. Underground main and fire hydrant installations on private property will require an FIR permit and full compli-ance with NFPA 24. [City Fire Code, Section 24.13(t)(13)]

4. Please inform contractor that where underground mains and hydrants are to be provided, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work. [NFPA 1: 16.4.3.1] Fire department access shall be provided at the start of the pro-ject and shall be maintained throughout construction. [NFPA 1: 18.2.2.1] In all buildings more than one story in height, at least one stairway shall be provided that is in usable condition at all times and that meets the requirements of 7.2.2 of the Life Safety Code, NFPA 101. [NFPA 1: 10.2]

5. A fire department access road shall extend within 50 ft of a single exterior door providing access to the interior of the build-ing. Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (450 ft for sprinkler protected structures) from fire department access roads. [NFPA 1: 18.2.3.2]

6. All structures must be protected by fire hydrants in accordance with City Fire Code 24.30(f). A determination will be made at the time plans are submitted for permitting. We will need a Required Fire Flow calculation in accordance with the ISO method demonstrating the water distribution system and new/existing fire hydrant(s) can deliver the demand.

7. All new buildings exceeding 5,000 square feet in area and residential occupancies, except detached one- and two-family dwellings, must be protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system. [City Fire Code, Chapter 24, Section 24.27(c)]

8. Be advised that any new construction must adhere to the requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2010 Edition, and The City of Orlando Fire Prevention Code.

Police The Orlando Police Department has reviewed the plans for Hyatt Place located at 225 S. Garland Ave., utilizing CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles. CPTED emphasizes the proper design and effective use of a created envi-ronment to reduce crime and enhance the quality of life. There are four overlapping strategies in CPTED that apply to any develop-ment: Natural Surveillance, Natural Access Control, Territorial Reinforcement and Target Hardening. For questions regarding the Orlando Police Department plan review, please contact Audra Nordaby at 407.246.2454 or [email protected]. Natural Surveillance: Design the site to keep intruders easily observable. This is promoted by features that maximize visibility of people, parking areas and building entrances; doors and windows that look out onto streets and parking areas; pedestrian-friendly sidewalks and street; porches or patios and adequate nighttime lighting. Overall Project: • A lighting plan was not available at the time of this review. Lighting plays a very important role in CPTED. It is crucial that

lighting sends the right messages to the public about the safe and appropriate use of space at different times of the day and night.

• All lighting for this project shall meet the guidelines in Orange County Ordinance No. 2003-08 and Orlando Land Develop-ment Code.

• In order to give employees and patrons a sense of safety, pedestrian-scale lighting should be used in all high-pedestrian traffic areas especially along entrances, the pedestrian colonnade, parking garage entrances, entrances to common areas, the pro-poses train platform and all walkways.

• Appropriate lighting should be included in any areas anticipated to be utilized after-dark. • This is especially true in and around the parking structure, elevator lobbies, stairwells, all public and private entrances, public

corridors and throughout any amenities. • Lighting is universally considered to be the most important security feature in a parking area. Illumination, uniformity, and


C O N D I T I O N S O F A P P R O VA L - R E Q U I R E D ( C O N T ’ D )


glare should all be taken into consideration. Lighting fixtures should be reliable, easy to maintain, withstand the elements, and be vandal-resistant.

• Since there is typically no natural surveillance around service and dumpster areas, be sure these areas are well-lit and that lighting is well maintained.

• Landscaping is another crucial aspect of CPTED. Trees branches should be kept trimmed to no lower than 6 feet from the ground and shrubs should be kept trimmed to no higher than 30 inches. Avoid conflicts between landscaping and lighting, especially lighting adjacent to canopy trees. Landscaping should not create blind spots or hiding places and should not block/cover windows. Open green spaces should be observable from nearby structures.

• Benches (or outdoor furniture) placed in common areas are a good way to increase surveillance and encourage community interaction. If used, consider furniture designs that encourage stopping and resting but reduce opportunities for potential offenders (i.e. a ribbed design rather than solid and center rails or arm rests to discourage sleeping).

• Bicycle parking should be observable from building entrances, securely fastened and not hidden behind landscaping. • Ensure that any canopies do not interfere with lighting, especially pedestrian scale, if these locations are to be used during

nighttime hours. • Any interior 90° corners in the hallways and common areas should utilize convex mirrors or reflective material to enhance

surveillance and line of site around corners. • All sides of the building should have windows to observe the walkways, parking areas and driving lanes. • Where possible, offices, reception areas, lobbies, or host stands should have exterior windows and furniture oriented to

improve visibility of any employees, patrons, and visitors moving throughout the property. Parking Garages: • Vehicle and pedestrian entrances into the parking garage should be well lit and defined by landscaping, signage and/or

architectural design. • Lighting is universally considered to be the most important security feature in a parking garage. Illumination, uniformity,

and glare should all be taken into consideration. Lighting fixtures should be reliable, easy to maintain, withstand the ele-ments, and be vandal-resistant.

• White concrete stain on the ceilings and beams within the parking garage is recommended to reflect light and improve uniformity.

• Anti-graffiti coating on the walls is recommended to discourage potential offenders from “tagging” these areas. • A parking garage design that is “open” on all sides is highly recommended. Shear walls should be avoided, especially

near turning bays and pedestrian travel paths. The use of cabling and other architectural elements that allow for visibility are encouraged.

• Stairwells should be well lit and constructed of an open design (not behind solid walls) that allows for visibility. • Elevator lobbies should be well lit and reflective surface materials may be used in these ‘coves’ to aid in natural surveil-

lance and safety for users. • Any interior 90° corners (i.e. turning bays) should utilize convex mirrors or reflective material to enhance surveillance

around corners. Natural Access Control: Design the site to decrease crime opportunity by denying access to crime targets and creating in offenders, a perception of risk. This can be accomplished by designing street, walkway, building and parking lot entrances to clearly indicate public routes and discourage access to private areas with structural and landscape elements. • Public entrances should be clearly defined by walkways, signs, and landscaping. Landscaping used around building and

parking garage entrances should create clear way-finding, be well lit and not block entrances or create ambush points. • There should be no easy access to the roof of the building. • Signs located throughout the parking facility should remind users to lock their vehicles and keep valuables out of sight. • Way-finding located throughout the property should help guide users to authorized areas while discouraging potential of-

fenders. • Signage with hours of operation should be clearly visible at any public entrance. • We encourage the use of traffic calming techniques as well as surface and gateway treatments throughout the project to

promote safe vehicle speeds, reduce collision frequency and increase the safety and the perception of safety for non-motorized users.

• Walkways should be a minimum 6’ in width to enhance pedestrian flow.


Territorial Reinforcement: Design can create or extend a sphere of influence, where users develop a sense of territorial control, while potential offenders are discouraged. This is promoted by incorporating features that define property lines and distinguish private spaces from public spaces such as; landscape plantings, pavement designs, gateway treatments and CPTED open design (see-through) fences. · The property should be designed to encourage interaction between users. · The building should have an address that is clearly visible from the street with numbers a minimum of five-inches high made of non-reflective material. • Fences may be considered to add security, delineate property lines, allow transparency for surveillance, be unobtrusive,

and create a sense of community. CPTED style fencing, at least 6-foot in height, is a good option to consider. Another option is landscape buffers, which include hostile vegetation, to delineate public from private spaces. The fencing and landscape buffer may be used together to further reinforce delineation.

• Maintenance is an important aspect of territorial reinforcement. A well-maintained area sends the message that people no-tice and care about what happens in an area. This in turn discourages vandalism and other crimes.

Target Hardening: This can be accomplished by features that prohibit entry or access such as window locks, dead bolts for doors and interior door hinges. Overall Project: • Door locks should be located a minimum of 40 inches from adjacent windows. • Room and non-public doors should contain 180° viewers/peep holes, interior hinges, single cylinder deadbolt locks with a minimum two-inch throw, metal frames with 3’ screws in the strike plates, and be made of solid core material. This includes all special use room doors. • All windows that open should have locks. • Sliding glass doors should have one permanent door on the outside and the inside moving door should have a docking de-vice and a pin. • An access control system should be considered so only employees and patrons of the hotel have access to their respective floor, parking, common amenities, and pedestrian access points. Common area doors or gates (leasing office, fitness center, pools, etc.) should have locks that automatically lock when the doors close. • Common areas should have signs that clearly identify operating hours and state that facilities are only for use by residents. • If an alarm or security system is installed, each unique space should be clearly identified with the alarm company and monitoring center and should be regularly tested and maintained. During working hours, commercial alarm systems (to include any common areas) should be programmed so that a short beep is sounded if an exterior door opens. • A security camera system capable of recording and retrieving an image to assist in offender identification and apprehen-sion should be used throughout this project. Security cameras should be mounted at an optimal height to capture offender identifi-cation (“aiming” down from the ceiling often results in images of the offender’s hat). CCTVs should also be placed in several locations throughout the parking areas, property access points, the proposed train platform and any other areas with limited or no natural surveillance. • Back or side doors (non-public) should be kept locked from the outside at all times. Internal business policy should pro-hibit the “propping open” of exterior doors. • OPD’s Crime Prevention Unit recommends that large glass doors and windows be made of impact resistant glass or a se-curity film (such as Lexan™) to reduce the opportunity for burglaries. If security film is utilized, ensure that the light transmit-tance of the security film is greater than or equal to the light transmittance of the window's glass. Additional precautions, such as silent alarms, hold-up alarms and retail training (what to do during a robbery), should be dis-cussed with OPD’s Crime Prevention Unit Officer Christopher Newton, 407.246.2093. Construction Site Crime Prevention: Due to the continued trend of theft of building materials and equipment from construction sites, Orlando Police Department’s Crime Prevention Unit strongly recommends that the developer institute the following crime prevention/security measures at this project site: 1) Post signs at the site that theft from the site or trespassing on a construction site is a felony under Florida Law and that the developer will prosecute. 2) To improve visibility of potential offenders by OPD patrol officers, perimeter lighting should be installed at a minimum of 150 foot intervals and at a height not less than fifteen (15’) from the ground. The light source used should have a minimum light



output of 2,000 lumens, shall be protected by a vandal resistant cover, and shall be lighted during the hours of darkness. 3) In addition to lighting, one of the following physical security measures should be installed: a. Fencing, not less than six (6’) feet in height, which is designed to preclude human intrusion, should be installed along the perimeter boundaries of the site and should be secured with chain and fire department padlocks for emergency vehicle access; post in a clear area, an emergency contact person and phones numbers for after hours, in case of an emergency; or b. A uniformed security guard should be hired to continually patrol the construction site during the hours when construction work has ceased. 4) Valuable construction materials and tools should be protected in a secondary fenced, locked cage.

• Post in a clean, open area, the name and numbers of an emergency contact person for OPD in case of a night-time emergency.

Additional Recommendations: Orlando Police Department Public Safety Communications System Conditions: Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS): All buildings shall provide an adequate level of indoor coverage for public-safety radio service for the City of Orlando radio com-munications system, including but not limited to police, firefighters, and other emergency responders. A DAS system will also improve commercial cellular service for building occupants. The system will enable all first responders to communicate with dis-patch and other field units. Inadequate coverage not only puts first responders at risk but also the citizens they are protecting. Adequate indoor radio coverage shall include the following standards: 1) Inbound into the building: A minimum average in-building field strength of 10 dbm above the noise floor throughout ninety-five (95%) of the area on each floor of the building when transmitted from the city’s police dispatch center and the appro-priate emergency service dispatch centers which are providing fire and emergency medical protection service to the building. 2) Outbound from the building: A minimum average outbound field strength of 10 dbm above the noise floor throughout ninety-five percent (95%) of the area on each floor of the building when transmitted from the field units portable radio to the ap-propriate emergency service dispatch centers which are providing fire and emergency medical protection service to the building. 3) The City’s Communications Unit with consideration of the appropriate police, fire and emergency medical department ser-vices shall determine the frequency range or ranges that must be supported. For the purpose of this section, adequate radio cover-age shall constitute a successful communications test between the equipment in the building and the Communications Centers for all appropriate emergency service providers for the building. 4) If any part of the installed system or systems contains an electrically powered component, the system shall be capable of an independent battery or generator system for a period of at least twelve hours without external power input or maintenance. The battery system shall automatically charge in the presence of external power. 5) FCC authorization: All amplification equipment must be FCC Type Accepted. 6) Developments must comply with NFPA 72-2010 – National Fire alarm and Signaling Code, Public Safety In-Building Requirements, as it pertains to emergency communications systems (ECS), and their components. If you have any questions regarding the requirements as listed above, it is suggested that you contact the OPD Radio Systems Administrator, Norm Poe at 321.235.5314. The OPD Technical Review Committee representative, Audra Nordaby 407.246.2454, can assist the applicant in contacting the Emergency Communication Representatives. Construction Site Crime Prevention: Due to the continued trend of theft of building materials and equipment from construction sites, Orlando Police Department’s Crime Prevention Unit strongly recommends that the developer institute the following crime prevention/security measures at this project site: • Post signs at the site that theft from the site or trespassing on a construction site is a felony under Florida Law and that the

developer will prosecute.



• To improve visibility of potential offenders by OPD patrol officers, perimeter lighting should be installed at a minimum of 150 foot intervals and at a height not less than fifteen (15’) from the ground. The light source used should have a minimum light output of 2,000 lumens, shall be protected by a vandal resistant cover, and shall be lighted during the hours of darkness.

In addition to lighting, one of the following physical security measures should be installed: • Fencing, not less than six (6’) feet in height, which is designed to preclude human intrusion, should be installed along the

perimeter boundaries of the site and should be secured with chain and fire department padlocks for emergency vehicle ac-cess; post in a clear area, an emergency contact person and phones numbers for after hours, in case of an emergency; or

• A uniformed security guard should be hired to continually patrol the construction site during the hours when construction work has ceased.

• Valuable construction materials and tools should be protected in a secondary fenced, locked cage. • Post in a clean, open area, the name and numbers of an emergency contact person for OPD in case of a night-time emer-

gency. If you have any questions, please call the Crime Prevention Unit, Officer Christopher Newton, 407.246.2093. Innovative Response to Improve Safety (I.R.I.S.) Camera System: OPD recommends that the developer contact OPD in an effort to coordinate camera system technology. OPD has the ability to monitor specified external camera systems from private facilities at the will of the developer or building owner. OPD monitoring will be in addition to self- monitoring and will not replace building camera monitoring. OPD will not have the ability to interfere with or manipulate building camera systems, only view. The additional monitoring is beneficial to both the developer/owner and OPD as a crime prevention and overall public safety solution. IRIS questions should be directed to the Orlando Police Department, Sgt. Andy Brennan, at [email protected]. Mutualink© - Real-time interoperable communications multimedia sharing: Mutualink© is an IP-based multimedia overlay network, designed to leverage the sharing of your existing radio, video, telephone, and IP-sensory equipment including disparate systems, as well as next-generation communication technology. Security and Pub-lic Safety agencies using Mutualink© have the dual benefit of maintaining full control of their radio, video, telephone, and IP-sensory related resources, while making them available for interoperable connection with other agencies' systems with the click of a mouse. Interconnection with the Mutualink© network is achieved without impacting the operation of existing console and re-mote control equipment.

OPD recommends that the developer contact OPD in an effort to coordinate security and surveillance system technology. OPD has the ability to monitor specified camera systems from private facilities at the will of the developer or building owner. OPD monitoring will be in addition to self- monitoring and will not replace building camera monitoring. OPD will not have the ability to interfere with or manipulate building camera systems, only view. The additional monitoring is beneficial to both the devel-oper/owner and OPD as a crime prevention and overall public safety solution.

Mutualink© questions should be directed to the Orlando Police Department, Sgt. Andy Brennan, at Andrew.Brennan@ cityofor-lando.net.



C O N TA C T I N F O R M ATI O N

Land Development

For questions regarding Land Development review, contact Karl Wielecki at 407.246.2726 or at [email protected].

Engineering/Zoning

For questions regarding Plat & Engineering/Zoning review, contact Keith Grayson at 407.246.3234 or at [email protected]. To obtain plan review status, schedule/cancel an inspection or obtain inspection results, please call PROMPT, our Interactive Response System at 407.246.4444.

Urban Design

For questions regarding Urban Design review, contact Doug Metzger at 407.246.3414 or at [email protected].

Transportation Planning

For questions regarding Transportation Planning , contact Matt Wiesenfeld at 407.246.2290 or

[email protected].

Transportation Engineering

For questions regarding Transportation Engineering review, contact Frank Consoli at 407.246.2703 or at

frank.consoli@cityof orlando.net.

Police

For questions regarding Police/CPTED review, contact Audra Nordaby at 407.246.2454 or at [email protected].

Fire Permits

For questions regarding Fire Permits review, contact Charles Howard at 407.246.2143 or at [email protected].

Parks/Trees

For questions regarding Parks review or tree permit removals, contact the Parks Dept. at 407.246.2283.

1. MPB minutes from the October 21, 2014 meeting are scheduled for review and approval by City Council on November 17, 2014.

2. Permits may be submitted following the MPB meeting but cannot be issued until the City Council approves the MPB meet-ing minutes.

R E V I E W /A P P R O VA L P R O C E S S - N E X T S T E P S
