mps and calcium score in asymptomatic patient...first step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a)...

16
MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient F. Mut, J. Vitola Nuclear Medicine Service, Asociacion Española Montevideo, Uruguay Quanta Diagnostico Nuclear Curitiba, Brazil

Upload: others

Post on 18-Nov-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

MPS and Calcium Score

in asymptomatic patient

F. Mut, J. Vitola

Nuclear Medicine Service, Asociacion Española

Montevideo, Uruguay

Quanta Diagnostico Nuclear

Curitiba, Brazil

Page 2: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

• Male 63 y.o., asymptomatic.

• Inactive but wants to start exercise.

• Knee osteoarthritis limiting exercise capacity.

• Hypertension (BP 145/90 mmHg under medication).

• Family history of CAD (father had sudden death at 53).

• Total Cholesterol = 223; HDL = 45; LDL = 128, Gluc = 0.97.

Clinical history

Page 3: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient?

a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham).

b) SPECT-MPS.

c) Coronary angioCT.

d) Rest ECG.

Page 4: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient?

a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham).

b) SPECT-MPS.

c) Coronary angioCT.

d) Rest ECG.

• Global risk score is a Class I indication in this setting; SPECT-MPS is

Class IIB or III, Coronary angioCT is Class III, and Rest ECG is Class IIA.

• Calculated Framingham risk score = 18% (intermediate risk for CAD

events in 10 years) based on SBP, cholesterol levels, age, gender, and

smoking status.

Page 5: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

Which test can help stratify intermediate CAD risk patients ?

a) Calcium score (CAC).

b) C-Reactive protein.

c) Carotid intima-media thickness on ultrasound.

d) All of the above.

Page 6: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

Which test can help stratify intermediate CAD risk patients ?

a) Calcium score (CAC).

b) C-Reactive protein.

c) Carotid intima-media thickness on ultrasound.

d) All of the above.

Page 7: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

CAC

1611 Agatston (Percentile 97 for sex, age and race)

High risk patient !

Page 8: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

Which test can help further stratify intermediate CAD risk patients with advanced atherosclerosis ?

a) Treadmill test

b) Myocardial perfusion study

c) CT angiography

d) Invasive angiography

Page 9: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

Which test can help further stratify intermediate CAD risk patients with advanced atherosclerosis ?

a) Treadmill test

b) Myocardial perfusion study

c) CT angiography

d) Invasive angiography

• In addition to the knowledge about atherosclerosis burden in our

patient, short-term prognosis is dependent on the presence and

degree of ischemia, the territory involved, and the LV function - all of

which can be provided by MPS.

Page 10: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

• SPECT MPS, combined low workload exercise with

dipyridamole, 99mTc-MIBI, one-day protocol.

• No symptoms or ST changes.

Myocardial perfusion study

Page 11: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

Myocardial perfusion study

LVEF: stress 67%, rest 62%

Page 12: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

a) Anteroseptal infarction + ischemia, high risk.

b) Normal perfusion.

c) Inferoapical ischemia, low risk.

d) Lateral wall ischemia, moderate risk.

The MPS result is consistent with:

Page 13: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

a) Anteroseptal infarction + ischemia, high risk.

b) Normal perfusion.

c) Inferoapical ischemia, low risk.

d) Lateral wall ischemia, moderate risk.

The MPS result is consistent with:

• The images show inferoapical reversible defect, with preserved LV

function both post-stress and rest = low risk for cardiac events.

Page 14: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

Follow-up

• Patient was managed clinically for CAD, ischemic heart

disease: Beta-blockers, ASA, statins.

• Secondary prevention (target = LDL< 70).

• Low level exercise: medicated and under supervision.

Page 15: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

• CAC provides independent incremental information in addition to traditional risk factors in the prediction of all-cause mortality.

• The principal difference between MPS and Ca scoring is that the former is an excellent tool for assessing short-term risk, guiding decisions on revascularization.

• In contrast, atherosclerosis imaging methods like CAC provide greater long-term risk assessment, and are more useful in defining the need for aggressive medical prevention.

Teaching points

Page 16: MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient...First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioCT. d) Rest ECG

• Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology,

cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive

risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive

imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J

Nucl Med 2006; 47:1107–18.

• Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary

calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol

2007; 49:1860-70.

• Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for

assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: executive summary:

a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart

Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;

56:2182-99.

• Xu Y, Arsanjani R, Clond M, et al. Transient ischemic dilation for coronary

artery disease in quantitative analysis of same-day sestamibi myocardial

perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:465-73.

Bibliography