mps and calcium score in asymptomatic patient...first step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a)...
TRANSCRIPT
MPS and Calcium Score
in asymptomatic patient
F. Mut, J. Vitola
Nuclear Medicine Service, Asociacion Española
Montevideo, Uruguay
Quanta Diagnostico Nuclear
Curitiba, Brazil
• Male 63 y.o., asymptomatic.
• Inactive but wants to start exercise.
• Knee osteoarthritis limiting exercise capacity.
• Hypertension (BP 145/90 mmHg under medication).
• Family history of CAD (father had sudden death at 53).
• Total Cholesterol = 223; HDL = 45; LDL = 128, Gluc = 0.97.
Clinical history
First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient?
a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham).
b) SPECT-MPS.
c) Coronary angioCT.
d) Rest ECG.
First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient?
a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham).
b) SPECT-MPS.
c) Coronary angioCT.
d) Rest ECG.
• Global risk score is a Class I indication in this setting; SPECT-MPS is
Class IIB or III, Coronary angioCT is Class III, and Rest ECG is Class IIA.
• Calculated Framingham risk score = 18% (intermediate risk for CAD
events in 10 years) based on SBP, cholesterol levels, age, gender, and
smoking status.
Which test can help stratify intermediate CAD risk patients ?
a) Calcium score (CAC).
b) C-Reactive protein.
c) Carotid intima-media thickness on ultrasound.
d) All of the above.
Which test can help stratify intermediate CAD risk patients ?
a) Calcium score (CAC).
b) C-Reactive protein.
c) Carotid intima-media thickness on ultrasound.
d) All of the above.
CAC
1611 Agatston (Percentile 97 for sex, age and race)
High risk patient !
Which test can help further stratify intermediate CAD risk patients with advanced atherosclerosis ?
a) Treadmill test
b) Myocardial perfusion study
c) CT angiography
d) Invasive angiography
Which test can help further stratify intermediate CAD risk patients with advanced atherosclerosis ?
a) Treadmill test
b) Myocardial perfusion study
c) CT angiography
d) Invasive angiography
• In addition to the knowledge about atherosclerosis burden in our
patient, short-term prognosis is dependent on the presence and
degree of ischemia, the territory involved, and the LV function - all of
which can be provided by MPS.
• SPECT MPS, combined low workload exercise with
dipyridamole, 99mTc-MIBI, one-day protocol.
• No symptoms or ST changes.
Myocardial perfusion study
Myocardial perfusion study
LVEF: stress 67%, rest 62%
a) Anteroseptal infarction + ischemia, high risk.
b) Normal perfusion.
c) Inferoapical ischemia, low risk.
d) Lateral wall ischemia, moderate risk.
The MPS result is consistent with:
a) Anteroseptal infarction + ischemia, high risk.
b) Normal perfusion.
c) Inferoapical ischemia, low risk.
d) Lateral wall ischemia, moderate risk.
The MPS result is consistent with:
• The images show inferoapical reversible defect, with preserved LV
function both post-stress and rest = low risk for cardiac events.
Follow-up
• Patient was managed clinically for CAD, ischemic heart
disease: Beta-blockers, ASA, statins.
• Secondary prevention (target = LDL< 70).
• Low level exercise: medicated and under supervision.
• CAC provides independent incremental information in addition to traditional risk factors in the prediction of all-cause mortality.
• The principal difference between MPS and Ca scoring is that the former is an excellent tool for assessing short-term risk, guiding decisions on revascularization.
• In contrast, atherosclerosis imaging methods like CAC provide greater long-term risk assessment, and are more useful in defining the need for aggressive medical prevention.
Teaching points
• Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology,
cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive
risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive
imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J
Nucl Med 2006; 47:1107–18.
• Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary
calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol
2007; 49:1860-70.
• Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for
assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: executive summary:
a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;
56:2182-99.
• Xu Y, Arsanjani R, Clond M, et al. Transient ischemic dilation for coronary
artery disease in quantitative analysis of same-day sestamibi myocardial
perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:465-73.
Bibliography