[mtt006 mtt-s international microwave symposium digest - washington, dc,usa (may 1980)] mtt-s...

3
‘ATTENUATION IN MICROSTRIP TRANSMISSION LINES WITH VERY LOSSY SUBSTRATESN B. W. Jervis, R. M. Pannell, and J. A. H. Steedenj Department of Communication Engineering, Plymouth Polytechnic, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, England Summar~ The design and development of microstrip-based attenuators suitable for broad-band applications is described. Expressions are derived for the propagation constant and characteristic impedance of attenuating sections of microstrip. Some prac- tical results are also given. Introduction An investigation of microstrip transmission li- ne structures with very lossy substrates is des- cribed. The work was in response to an industrial requirement for a cheap and novel attenuator suitable for mass production and capable of pro- viding 30 dB of attenuation from d.c. to 12 GHz. The possibility of replacing a section of the microstrip substrate beneath the top conductor with very lossy conductive material was investi- gated. There appears to be no previously publi- shed theory of this structure in the literature. Attenuation Theory First, expressions for the attenuation constant O( , phase Constatp , and characteristic impe- dance, ZO, appropriate to a length of microstrip constructed on a very lossy substrate were obtai- ned in order to evolve a suitable design in which these parameters would be frequency-independent. These quantities are given for a TEM mode by the equations ~=Re(~), (1) ~= Im(ti), (2) ~.~(R+j@L)(G +j6JC), (3) and / =R+.j@L ‘o G + jwC (4) where R, L, G, and C are the usual transmis~$ion line parameters and @ is the angular frequency. Above about 2 GHz hybrid modes were known to be- come important Ill but as their effect amounts at the most to only a 16% change over the band- width from d.c. to 12 GHz [23 - [4] they were regarded here as of secondary importance to be included as a correction, if necessary, at s later stage. For low-loss transmission lines the conditions G4Gt.oC, RtiwL apply leading to the familiar expressions r oi=O,P.&dfiandZo= ~ (5) These conditions are inappropriate for a very 10SSY line with G>>&C. Thus new expressions ford, fi, and Z. were required. It was shown, for example, that when G>WC, R&&L that OL=p =JE” 2 (6) while ‘o r =@& ‘(7) G The frequency-dependence of these parameters de- pends upon that of G and L. If the devices are thin compared to a skin depth they will be fre- 471 However, for the lossy subst- ::::c:ei~zzF~gyn~:81] G =b6? ~ C (8) ~/ where t+~uis the effective conductivity due to the polarisation losses of the conductin~- substrate of complex dielectric permittivity G --6”, is the real electrical conductivity of the rate. Thus , if u>>~kawe have “p ‘m and ‘0= m and ~ subst- (9) (10) so that~,~ and Z. are each proportional to &$-. Similarly if tdiq~ it is easily shown that &&tiwhile Z. will be frequency-independent. Thus a broadband attenuator cannot be constructed in lossy microstrip. Equation (9) is of some importance. authors C6] - [8] have stated that Whenp~~Z~Z~OS- ses dominatedis independent of frequency. That conclusion is not true in the case of 10SSy subs- trates such as semiconductor materials with con- ductivities greater than about 0.008 Sm (at 12GHz) For these substrates (9) predicts that dand P ~ ~+ and this result is expected to be of part- icular significance for monolithic integrated ci- rcuits operating at Gbit rates. To produce a broadband attenuator the conditions G>>AIC, R>>tiL must be satisfied. Then Y=@ (11) so that d== (12) f- = o, (13) and ~ ‘o ‘G (14) If the device is thinner than a skin depth R and G will be frequency independent. We then have for c>>~~” ‘r%- (15) (16) both expressions being frequency-independent as required. However, if tdfitl>>UbothoC and ZO are frequency- dependent. Thus for a broadband attenuator it is required that G>>@C, R>>6JL and ~>XJ&V A structure which may satisfy these conditions is shown in Fig. 1. Note that the top conductor is replaced at the lossy section by lossy material to ensure R>>&JL. In the presence of the top conductor R<<6JL. The line parameters R, G may be obtained from a consideration of Fig. 1 as R=l fi ~-l UW(h + t) (17)

Upload: jah

Post on 23-Dec-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: [MTT006 MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest - Washington, DC,USA (May 1980)] MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest - "Attenuation in Microstrip Transmission Lines

‘ATTENUATION IN MICROSTRIP TRANSMISSION LINES WITH VERY LOSSY SUBSTRATESN

B. W. Jervis, R. M. Pannell, and J. A. H. SteedenjDepartment of Communication Engineering, Plymouth Polytechnic,

Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, England

Summar~

The design and development of microstrip-basedattenuators suitable for broad-band applications

is described. Expressions are derived for thepropagation constant and characteristic impedance

of attenuating sections of microstrip. Some prac-tical results are also given.

Introduction

An investigation of microstrip transmission li-

ne structures with very lossy substrates is des-

cribed. The work was in response to an industrial

requirement for a cheap and novel attenuator

suitable for mass production and capable of pro-viding 30 dB of attenuation from d.c. to 12 GHz.

The possibility of replacing a section of themicrostrip substrate beneath the top conductor

with very lossy conductive material was investi-

gated. There appears to be no previously publi-

shed theory of this structure in the literature.

Attenuation Theory

First, expressions for the attenuation constant

O( , phase Constatp , and characteristic impe-dance, ZO, appropriate to a length of microstrip

constructed on a very lossy substrate were obtai-

ned in order to evolve a suitable design in which

these parameters would be frequency-independent.

These quantities are given for a TEM mode by theequations

~=Re(~), (1)

~= Im(ti), (2)

~.~(R+j@L)(G +j6JC), (3)

and/

=R+.j@L‘o G + jwC

(4)

where R, L, G, and C are the usual transmis~$ion

line parameters and @ is the angular frequency.Above about 2 GHz hybrid modes were known to be-come important Ill but as their effect amountsat the most to only a 16% change over the band-

width from d.c. to 12 GHz [23 - [4] they were

regarded here as of secondary importance to be

included as a correction, if necessary, at s

later stage.

For low-loss transmission lines the conditions

G4Gt.oC, RtiwL apply leading to the familiarexpressions

roi=O,P.&dfiandZo= ~ (5)

These conditions are inappropriate for a very

10SSY line with G>>&C. Thus new expressionsford, fi, and Z. were required. It was shown,

for example, that when G>WC, R&&L that

OL=p =JE”2

(6)

while‘o r

=@& ‘(7)G

The frequency-dependence of these parameters de-pends upon that of G and L. If the devices are

thin compared to a skin depth they will be fre-

471

However, for the lossy subst-

::::c:ei~zzF~gyn~:81]

G =b6? ~ C (8)~/

where t+~uis the effective conductivity due to thepolarisation losses of the conductin~- substrateof complex dielectric permittivity G --6”,is the real electrical conductivity of the

rate.

Thus , if u>>~kawe have

“p ‘mand‘0=m

and ~

subst-

(9)

(10)

so that~,~ and Z. are each proportional to

&$-.

Similarly if tdiq~ it is easily shown that

&&tiwhile Z. will be frequency-independent.

Thus a broadband attenuator cannot be constructedin lossy microstrip.

Equation (9) is of some importance.

authors C6] - [8] have stated that Whenp~~Z~Z~OS-ses dominatedis independent of frequency. That

conclusion is not true in the case of 10SSy subs-

trates such as semiconductor materials with con-ductivities greater than about 0.008 Sm (at 12GHz)

For these substrates (9) predicts that dandP

~ ~+ and this result is expected to be of part-

icular significance for monolithic integrated ci-

rcuits operating at Gbit rates.

To produce a broadband attenuator the conditionsG>>AIC, R>>tiL must be satisfied. Then

Y=@ (11)

so that d== (12)

f-

= o, (13)

and~

‘o ‘G(14)

If the device is thinner than a skin depth R andG will be frequency independent. We then havefor c>>~~”

‘ ‘r%-(15)

(16)

both expressions being frequency-independent as

required.

However, if tdfitl>>UbothoC and ZO are frequency-

dependent. Thus for a broadband attenuator it is

required that G>>@C, R>>6JL and ~>XJ&V Astructure which may satisfy these conditions isshown in Fig. 1. Note that the top conductor isreplaced at the lossy section by lossy material

to ensure R>>&JL. In the presence of the top

conductor R<<6JL. The line parameters R, G may

be obtained from a consideration of Fig. 1 as

R=l fi ~-l

UW(h + t)(17)

Page 2: [MTT006 MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest - Washington, DC,USA (May 1980)] MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest - "Attenuation in Microstrip Transmission Lines

.

G=iYVl~t) Mho m-q (18)

where c is the conductivity of the 10SSY material.

Thus

d=JRG = -’1+7-2)nepe-rs n (19)

(20)

Both expressions are independent of frequency

provided the height of the 10SSY material is less

than a skin depth and P>?$J~”.

Fig. 1 Broadband Attenuator Structure

Fabrication and Measurement Procedure

The attenuation of the 10SSY tnicrostrip and of

the attenuators was determined from the measured

scattering parameters Sll, S22 and S21. Double-

sided copper-clad printed circuit board was usedin this initial study. The top conductor wasdefined by etching and then a short section rem-

oved at the intended location of the 10SSY insert.

A hole of the correct dimensions was cut into the

substrate material and was then filled with asuitable conductive material. For the very-lossymicrostrip experiments a top conductor was then

soldered back into place. The lines designated asattenuators were left ‘!topless.TJ The attenuation,A(dH), was obtained from the equation

A(dB) = 10 10g10 152212(1 - ]s,,12)(1 - ]s2212 ) (21)

Results and Discussion

Fig. 2 shows plots of attenuation versus fre-

quency, f, for microstrip with a section of very

10SSY substrate. Interpretation of these results

was facilitated by plotting log ~OA(dB) versus

logqof. These curves indicated that at low fre-0.1

quenciesO@ , while at higher frequencies the

fvariation was between & 0.8

and~%l’”’” .According to (9) ~ec$~ was expected, assuming

that G >>tiC and R<<tiL. The results were ex-

The results were explained on the assumption that

~was too small so that &g’’+C<&If?! This would

mean G .& a c. A detailed analysis showed that

& could then be frequency-independent while at

higher frequencies d-$ , thus explaining why

44$0-1 ando/&$ 0.8 was observed. The case

C?&@ .7 represents the well-known phenomenon

of dielectric heating [92 and Pucel et al [1]

confirmed that for a non-conducting substrate

&&$ . The result c-4 4$.1.7 was attributed to

the existence of eddy currents in the small con-

ducting particles of the 10SSY substrate since

$eddy current losses are< 2 at low frequencies and

$’-5 at high frequencies [gJ. It was concluded

that the proposed theory of very 10SSY microstripwas correct.

26I I I I I I +

17

(t kT .‘/’d

4

3

aE

Fig. 2 Attenuation versus Frequency

for Microstrip with Lossy Insert

The plots of~and Zoversus frequency fOr the

prototype attenuators were analysed in great de-tail for frequencies up to 3 GHz only. It was

possible to show that the increase in 4 with

frequency, Fig. 3, occurred because the condition

R>>tiL was not satisfied. One reason for this

waa because it had heen assumed, after Luskow

[IO] , that the surface layer of the 10SSY insertof thickness t would serue as the top conductor.Actually R was found to be associated with the

full thickness of the 10SSY insert (t+h), and

this is reflected in the correct design equations(17)-(20). A second reason was thatL was enha-

nced due to the presence of eddy currents in thelossy insert. Thus the value of L was ded:;edas 17.0 @lm-’ compared with about. 314 nH

calculated from Wheeler’s equation (8), c1 3.

An attempt was made to increase R by reducing

0-. To keep Z. constant G was increased by using

a reduced height structure, Fig.4. An improved

attenuator characteristic resulted (Fig.3) butthe mismatch increased with frequency, possibly

because of the reduced height section.

A third attenuator was designed with &z7GJ&’

to ensure G >>@C. Also R and G were calculated

from (17) and (18). This attenuator exhibited

472

Page 3: [MTT006 MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest - Washington, DC,USA (May 1980)] MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest - "Attenuation in Microstrip Transmission Lines

z+ I I I I t I I I I I I I I I23 —

.?1-

21 —

: ITb

REDUC-?D ti=ikw bTTdUAti

qM -u

i

LFKEOUE-NO’ (~ti$j

I

0I I I I I I I I I I I I t t )

10 20 3*

Fig.3 Attenuation versus Frequencyfor Diffedent Structures Investigated

LoSS~ INSERT Top COAUW.TOR,

i

Fig.4 Reduced Height Attenuator

broadband attenuation behaviour, Fig.5. l!h e

increase in attenuation above 5 GHz was pc~sGiblydue to the skin effect since & was inadvertently

made too high thus reducing the skin depth $ .

since d@(h+t)-q and (h+t)+1

should then become6 ,

*dthen increases as f . Efforts are being made to

improve upon this result.Conclusion

This approach to broadband attenuator desiLgn hasbeen successful and further development is beingundertaken. The important result that th~? atten-

uation and phase constants of microstrip inter-connections in monolithic integrated circuitswill be strongly frequency-dependent was ldis-

covered. This is additional to the norma:l dis-

persive behaviour of microstrip.

32

31

30I

Fig.5 Attenuation versus Frequency

for Third Attenuator

AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Ha%field Instruments, plynlouth

for highlighting the commercial requirement for abroadband attenuator, and Acheson ~olloids,plyrnouthfor supplying conductive materials. Thanks arealso due to Mr. A. Santillo for ordering materials

and to Dr. D. J. Mapps for a discussion about eddycurrents.

References1. R.A.Pucel, D.J.Mass&, and C.P. HartwiQ ‘tLossesin Microstrip!l IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and

Tech., VO1.MTT-16, No 6,PP 342-350, June 19682. W.J.Getslnger,- ItMicrowave Dispersion Modeltt

IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tec~., VO1.MTT-21,

No I,pp 34-39, January 19733.R.D.Owens, ‘tPredicted Frequency Dependence of

MicrostriP Characteristic Impedance Using the Plan-ar Waveguide Modeltt Electronics Letters, V01,12,

No 11, pp 269-27o, May 19764. H.J.Carlin “A Simplified Circuit Model for Micro

strip!! IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.,vol.MTT-

21, pp .589-591, September 1973

.5. R.E.Collin “Foundation for Microwave Engineering’!McGraw-Hill, 1966

6. T.M.Hyltin,’tMicrostrip Transmission on Semicon-ductor Dielectric$~, IEEE Trans. Microwave TheoryTech.,vol. MTT-13, pp 777-78?, November 1965

7. J.D. Welch and H.J. Pratt “Losses in MicrostripTransmission Systems for Integrated Microwave Cir-cuits!! NEREM RECORD, V01.8,PP 100-1, 19668. I.J.Bahl and D.K.Trivedi., ‘1A Designers Guide toMicrostrip Line!r Microwaves, pp 174-182, 197’79. D.J.Fink ‘rStandard Handbook for Electrical Eng-ineerslt 10th Ed.t McGraw-Hill, p2-21Icj. A.A.Jjuskow, !!Precision Attenuators for Micro-

wave Frequencies)l Marconi Instrumentation, V01.147No 4,pp 81-86, 197411. H.A.Wheeler, f!Transmis~ion Line Properties of

Parallel Strips Separated by a Dielectric Sheet.Jl,IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech-,vol-MTT-’l3;pp 172-185, March 1965

473