mul(lingualweb/lt$ execu(ve$summary$ - w3

The Mul(lingualWeb-‐LT Working Group receives funding by the European Commission (project name LT-‐Web) through the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) in the area of Language Technologies. Grant Agreement No. 287815.

Mul(lingualWeb-‐LT Execu(ve Summary

Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow


Project goals •  Provide reference implementa(ons of metadata for mul(lingual processes – Content crea(on, (human or machine) transla(on, localiza(on workflows, ...

•  Define a metadata standard based on implementa(ons and exis(ng work – From Interna(onaliza(on Tag Set (ITS) 1.0 > ITS 2.0

•  Con(nue and enlarge a community around the Mul(lingualWeb


Groups involved

MLW-‐LT consor(um (Reference Implementa(ons)

W3C MLW-‐LT Working Group

Members (Standardiza(on)

MLW PC members (Community building)


Requirements Gathering •  Workshop June 2012, Dublin – 71 a^endees –  New stakeholders: linked open data community –  New implementers: Adobe, ]init[, Logrus, Tilde

•  Requirements gathering document – W3C public working drab – Wiki version 21.000+ access


Standardiza(on Process ... •  ITS 2.0 drab development June – December 2012 – 40+ individuals par(cipa(ng – 2100+ emails, aggressive standardiza(on progress – Engaging “invited experts” and further par(cipants, including higher-‐level decision makers:

Adobe, CNR, DERI, Ecole Mohammadia

d'Ingenieurs Rabat, ]init[, Logrus, NCSR, Opera, SAP, Tilde


... driven by implementa(ons •  Test suite development star(ng August 2012, driven by TCD –  Input: Files with ITS 2.0 metadata – Output: metadata overview –  Current state: 223 input files, 839 implementer output files, 80% coverage

<!DOCTYPE html> ... <p>Everything started when Zebulon discovered that he had a <span translate="NO">doppelgänger</span> ... </html>

... /html/body[1]/p[1] translate="yes" /html/body[1]/p[1]/span[1] translate="no" ...


“Metadata for the Mul(lingual Web” •  Summarizing usage scenarios and implementa(ons

•  Aligned with implementa(on development


Usage scenarios and implementa(on highlights

•  XLIFF transla(on package crea(on driven by ITS 2.0 metadata

•  Quality check driven by metadata constraints •  Installa(on of workflow from CMS to TMS system •  CMS implementa(on of metadata authoring support


Usage scenarios and implementa(on highlights

•  Text-‐processing component interconnected with Drupal

•  Cocomore – Linguaserve: showcase “localiza(on workflow with VDMA”

•  Linguaserve: “real (me MT with Spanish Tax Agency”

•  Volunteer implementer Shaun McCance –  ITS Tool: XML to PO and back


Not covered during this review •  Valida(on of HTML5+ITS (UEP) – Available at h^p://validator.nu/ – Staged for integra(on in W3C validator

•  ITS Libre Office Writer Extension -‐ ]init[ •  ITS 2.0 Enriched Terminology Annota(on – Tilde •  Visual designs to render "ITS for HTML5” – Logrus •  Localisa(on Workflows Using ITS 2.0 with Adobe CQ and Apache JackRabbit – Adobe


Deliverables for year one •  D1.1 Detailed Overall Management and Bodies Management, including the Quality Assurance Plan

•  D1.2.1 Report on Internal and External Communica(on Tools

•  D1.2.2 LT-‐Web -‐ W3C Coordina(on Yearly Report •  D1.2.3 Contact Database •  D2.1 Requirements and Use Case Document •  D2.2 LT-‐Web Metadata Drab Documents


Deliverables for year one •  D4.1.1 Lucy Modifica(on •  D4.1.2 MaTrEx Modifica(on •  D4.1.3 Linguaserve Online System Modifica(on •  D4.1.4 Report on Modifica(ons in MT Systems •  D6.1.1 Workshop 1 •  D6.1.2 Summary Report 1


WP5 “Deep Web Informa(on and MT Training”

•  Deliverables – D5.1.1 MT Training Module – D5.1.2 XLIFF Deep Web MT Training Exporter – D5.2 Metadata-‐Aware MT Training

•  Delivery date will be delayed to be able to benefit from Cocomore training data

•  Overall WP will be in (me (conclusion by M21)


Communica(on •  W3C infrastructure + telephone conference tool – Mailing lists –  IRC – Ac(on / issue tracker –  ... see D1.2.1

•  Separate channels for – Working Group (standardiza(on) – Workshop planning (MLW PC) – Public


Management

MLW-‐LT consor(um (Reference Implementa(ons)

W3C MLW-‐LT Working Group

Members (Standardiza(on)

MLW PC members (Community building) Communica(on

infrastructure


Conclusion •  Community building via suppor(ng ... – Reference implementa(on – Standardiza(on – Outreach

•  ... pays of! •  Similar projects could be useful in the future


Q/A