multi-agency public protection arrangements mappa neil prunnell mappa strategy manager - greater...
TRANSCRIPT
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
MAPPA
Neil Prunnell MAPPA Strategy Manager - Greater Manchester
Shelley Scott National Head of MAPPA - UK Ministry of Justice
Roy LedinghamPolice Lead for MAPPA - UK Ministry of Justice
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
1. Legislation
2. MAPPA Process
3. Lessons learnt for England / Wales
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
The Sex Offenders Act 1997 … was introduced
In the years leading up to 1997, following a number of high profile cases of child abduction / murder …
Introduced a National register of sex offenders / reporting requirements
The Police - primary responsibility
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
In reality inconsistent and often flawed practice ..
Ineffective management of sexual and dangerous offenders, came to a head for authorities throughout the UK, during the year 2000.
Public outrage over the lack of effective monitoring of Sexual and Violent Offenders’ in some areas…. combined with campaign following the murder of 8 year old Sarah Payne.. Forced the government to react rapidly and introduce important changes to existing legislation.
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
The PURPOSE Of MAPPA is …
To help to reduce the re-offending behavior of sexual and violent offenders - in order to
protect the public, including previous victims, from serious harm.
MAPPA Guidance (2009) Version 3.0, Section 1.2
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
‘Ensure that all reasonable steps are taken
to reduce the likelihood of harm to the
public’.
The AIM of MAPPA is …
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Criminal Justice and Court Services Act (2000)
Criminal Justice Act (2003)• Introduction of MAPPA for all areas in England and Wales
Sexual Offences Act (2003)•Notification for sexual offenders reinforced•Length of notification period depends upon sentence•Sex Offender Prevention Orders•Foreign Travel Orders•Notification orders for offenders coming from other countries•Annual re notification
MAPPA Legislation And Guidance:
A Database for Sexual Offenders
VISOR• VISOR is a securely encrypted web based software
application that holds the personal details on all relevant Sex offenders in the UK.
• VISOR is a national database covering Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales and available to police/ prison and probation
• It contains information on such things as DOB, NI numbers, relationships, employment, hobbies, address’s, foreign travel, pets, vehicles and so on.
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Responsible Authority Agencies
PROBATION / POLICE / PRISON SERVICE
Social Services
Mental Health / Health AgenciesLocal Housing AuthoritiesLocal Education Authorities
Registered Social Landlords
Youth Offending Teams
Jobcentre Plus
Duty to Co-operate Agencies
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Category 1
Registered sexual offenders
Subject of various reporting
requirements under (Sexual Offences Act
2003).
Category 2
Violent –and (Received at least 12 months in custody and on probation
license)
Category 3
Other Dangerous Offenders posing risk of SERIOUS
harm
Who is managed through MAPPA ?
The 3 CATEGORIES of MAPPA Offender
The MAPPA Process
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Identification
Information Sharing
Information Sharing
Risk Assessment
Information Sharing
Risk Management
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Identification
This is critical to the whole process -
Offenders cannot be managed unless correctly identified as eligible
Ensure there is clarity in what constitutes a MAPPA offender
Appropriate computer systems and admin resources are essential
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Information Sharing
Create a move away from a culture of agencies acting alone and protecting ‘their information’
Legislation needs to support proactive information sharing between agencies.
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Information Sharing Must:
• Have lawful authority
• Be necessary
• Be proportionate
• Ensure the safety and security of the information shared
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Risk Assessment
There will always be too many offenders under MAPPA to manage them all at an intensive level
Risk Assessment is therefore crucial as the first step in deciding at what level an offender needs to be managed
Risk assessment must be systematic
Risk factors
• STATIC - Factors which cannot change : Previous convictions/behaviour OGRS- based on static information
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
• DYNAMIC - Factors which can change : Accommodation, employment, drug/alcohol abuse, emotional well being, health.
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Risk Matrix 2000 is a joint risk assessment actuarial tool used by the police and probation service for men 18 or over convicted of a sexual offence
Seven static risk factors are measured
Number of Court appearances sentenced for a sexual offenceAge on release Number of occasions sentenced for a criminal offence
Male victimStranger VictimNon contact Sexual offenceNever lived with a partner for 2 years
Static Risk Factors for Sexual Offenders
Dynamic Risk Factors for Sexual Offenders - 4 Domains
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
1.Sexual Interests - sexual preoccupation/ preference for Children
2. Offence Supportive Attitudes - cognitive distortions/ revenge and hostility
3. Management of relationships - Low self esteem/ inadequacy/ lack of intimacy
4. Self - Management - irresponsible / impulsive
Imminence levels - Risk of Serious Harm
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
LowNo significant current indicators of risk of serious harm.
MediumIdentifiable risk of serious harm. Unlikely to cause harm unless there is a change in circumstances
HighIdentifiable indicators of risk of serious harm and could occur at any time and the impact would be serious
Very HighImminent risk of serious harm and impact would be serious.
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Risk Management – Restrictive
Police transport from prison Restrict Employment Increased police surveillance Prison Licence conditions Sex offender registration Disclosure of information
Rehabilitation Intensive change focus treatment Supported accommodation Employment and training Mental health treatment Circles of accountability
MAPPA - What we learnt in England and Wales
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
Early Involvement of prisons in MAPPA Recognise that police and probation staff are different and
need time to learn how to work together Be clear about what information can be shared with other
agencies Prioritise offenders carefully – ensure MAPPA used
appropriately and do not try to do too much Ensure consistency by developing a core group of relevant
agencies Ensure that risk management plans relate to the risks
indentified
MAPPA success in England and Wales
Increased Public confidence
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
MAPPA provided the authority to exchange information
Agencies were more confident to manage risk as they were no longer working in isolation or making critical decisions alone. Experts from different agencies make important contributions to overall plan Notification process is vital to manage sexual offenders
MAPPA helps us to learn new skills and best practice from each other Risk assessments are more accurate - less mistakes Support for disclosure decisions Risk management more effective as relevant resources were made available
Neil Prunnell MAPPA Strategy Manager - Greater Manchester [email protected]
Shelley Scott National Head of MAPPA - UK Ministry of [email protected]
Roy LedinghamNational Police lead for MAPPA - UK Ministry of [email protected]
Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements