multi-channel wireless networks with infrastructure support: capacity and delay hong-ning dai (macau...
TRANSCRIPT
Multi-channel Wireless Networks with Infrastructure Support:
Capacity and Delay
Hong-Ning Dai (Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau)
Raymond Chi-Wing Wong (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong)
Qinglin Zhao (Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau)
Presented by Hong-Ning Dai
Comparison with existing networks
Pure Ad Hoc Ad Hoc with Infrastructure
Single Channel
SC-AH networks
[1]
SC-IS networks
[2] [3]
Multiple Channels
MC-AH networks
[4]
MC-IS networks
our proposed
frequ
ency d
om
ain
Ad Hoc hybridity
Our proposed MC-IS networks have more benefits than the existing networks
MC-IS Network
Base station
Common node
Wired network
Ad hoc communications withinH hops
uplink
downlink
Infrastructure communications
No capacity constraint and delay constraint within wired networks
Our contributions
Formally identify an MC-IS network.
Derive both the upper bounds and the constructive lower bounds of the capacity of an MC-IS network.
Find that the capacity of an MC-IS network contributed by ad hoc communications is mainly limited by four requirements.
Four requirements
1( )
AC O F
2( )
AC O F
1( )
AC F
and 2( )
AC F
1( )o GH
1( )GH
2( )o GH
2( )GH
3( )o GH
3( )GH
Sub-case 1 Sub-case 2 Sub-case 3 Sub-case 4 Sub-case 5 Sub-case 6(Interface-bottleneck)
(Connectivity) (Interference) (Interface-bottleneck)
(Destination-bottleneck)
(Interface-bottleneck)
Summary of our major results
MC-IS networks
SC-IS networks
MC-AH networks
SC-AH networks
DelayDelayCapacity Capacity NetworksNetworks
Our proposed MC-IS networks have the optimal capacity and the minimal delay!
Methodology overview
Derivation of Network Capacity Contributed by Ad Hoc Communications Upper bounds Lower bounds (constructive)
Derivation of Network Capacity Contributed by Infrastructure Communications Upper bounds Lower bounds (constructive)
To prove these bounds is non-trivial!
Constructive lower bounds
Tessellation
Bound the number of interfering nodes Apply channel models (path loss, interference,
shadowing) Determine the interference range
The size of cell needs to be satisfied
with connectivity constraintconnectivity constraint
Cell lattice
We must ensure the interference constraintinterference constraint is satisfied.
Design proper routing algorithms
Connect each source destination pair Si-Di
Design shorted routing path (almost straight lines)
Assign the proper number of routes at each node so that
(i) not too many routes
(ii) not too few routes
Design TDMA scheme to schedule interfering cells to be active one by one
Other contributions
Our proposed MC-IS network offers a more general theoretical framework than other existing networks.
Other networks such as an SC-AH network, an MC-AH network, and an SC-IS network can be regarded as special cases of our MC-IS network.
More details about our results
Please refer to our paper in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2014 - Ad-hoc and Sensor Networking SyAd-hoc and Sensor Networking Symposiummposium
More complete version: H.-N. Dai, R. C.-W. Wong, and Q. Zhao, “Multi-chan
nel wireless networks with infrastructure support: Capacity and delay,” Tech. Rep., Feb. 2014. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.1530v2.pdf or