Multi-stakeholder Consultation on

“Financing for Development in Asia and the Pacific”

Organized by the Financing for Development Office, UN-DESA, in cooperation with the Association of Development Financing

Institutions in Asia and the Pacific

Jomo Kwame Sundaram

Assistant Secretary-General for Economic Development

Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA)

United Nations

Bangkok, Thailand, 17 December 2007

2

Financing for Development process Monterrey Consensus, adopted at 2002 UN

Conference on Financing for Development, recognized global partnership for development central to achieve internationally agreed development goals.

Follow-up International Conference on Financing for Development (Doha, Qatar, 29 November - 2 December 2008): historic opportunity to review implementation of Monterrey Consensus, and address new challenges and emerging issues.

3

Mixed track record in implementation

Since 2002, considerable advances in some areas, while progress modest or stagnation/regression in others.

Despite decreasing share of poor in world population, poverty still increasing in many countries. Inequalities among and within countries also increasing.

4

Net transfer of financial resourcesfrom South to North

Net outward financial flows from developing to developed countries increased from $728 bn in 2006 to $760 bn in 2007. Continued increases since 1998. Increase has not slowed in East and South Asia.

Tying up investible funds as reserves reduces domestic investments, e.g. for infrastructure and services.

Reserves build-up raises interest rates.

5

Source: UN World Economic Situation and Prospects 2008 (forthcoming)

-1000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

Bill

ions

of U

S do

llars

Developing economies Africa Eastern and Southern Asia Western Asia Latin America

Net transfer of financial resourcesfrom South to North

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

6

Multi-stakeholder consultations on Financing for Development

How to reverse paradox of net transfers from South to North to mobilize resources for development.

The Financing for Development Office (FfDO) of UN-DESA has conducted various multi-stakeholder consultations in different regions on how to mobilize financing for development.

Two current tracks deal with: Rethinking role of development finance institutions

/National Development Banks (NDBs)Financing access to basic utilities for all

7

A. Rethinking role of development finance institutions/National Development Banks

B. Financing access to basic utilities for all

8

A. Rethinking role of NDBs: Diversity of institutions Wide range of types of development financing

institutions among and within regions. In Asia and the Pacific, at least five different sub-

regions (Central Asia, South Asia, Northeast Asia, South East Asia, and the Pacific).

Development Banks operate at different levels Global level (e.g. Islamic Development Bank), Regional level (e.g., Asian Development Bank,

China Development Bank, Bank of Japan) National level, where they can be further divided

into more specific categories (e.g. sectoral, provincial).

9

A. Rethinking role of DFIs/NDBs:Consultations

FfDO organized multi-stakeholder consultations in Europe, Africa and Latin America, involving national development banks, governments, international organizations, financial institutions, private sector and civil society.

Consultations reveal that NDBs/DFIs have critical role in economic and social development.

10

A. Rethinking role of DFIs/NDBs: General conclusions (I)

DFIs have a development objective. Raison-d’être is to bring finance to specific clients or projects that lack access to credit, particularly in medium and long term. Thus, DFIs should fill development gaps and address both market and state failures (e.g., in infrastructure investment).

DFIs provide not only financial instruments (grants, loans, credits, guarantees, etc.), but also non-financial services (policy advice, technical assistance and capacity-building).

11

Additional resources needed to develop financial instruments.

When DFIs are banks, they have access to resources through clients and government deposits, but banking legislation imposes restrictions. When DFIs are not banks, harder to mobilize resources, but DFIs have greater flexibility to use them.

DFIs often have complex structures. Different models to coordinate commercial and development activities (single organization or separate entities) seem viable.

A. Rethinking role of DFIs/NDBs: General conclusions (II)

12

A. Rethinking role of DFIs/NDBs: Action-oriented proposals

Organize systematic sharing of information and cooperation among interested DFIs through regional associations: on regional, sub-regional and national development

projects on best practices on governance and management on financial guidelines

13

A. Rethinking role of development finance institutions (DFIs)/National Development Banks

(NDBs)

B. Financing access to basic utilities for all

14

B. Financing Access to basic utilities for all:Consultations

Consultations organized by Friedrich Ebert Foundation (FES), in cooperation with FfDO.

Meetings held in Africa and Latin America, brought together experts from governments, utilities, civil society, private sector, and academia to develop policy options to improve financing for basic utilities in developing countries and to increase access for poor to water and electricity.

15

B. Financing Access to Basic Utilities for All:General conclusions (I) Discussions held from vantage of publicly owned

utilities, taking into account domestic and international capital markets, macroeconomic factors, and internal revenue generation.

Major conclusion: infrastructure spending needs increasing rapidly in developing countries. Central governments need sufficient policy space to set right spending priorities.

Expenditure ceilings for municipalities should be reevaluated to make more resources available for infrastructure and social spending.

16

Public providers can explore new innovative mechanisms for raising finance. Potential instruments include municipal bonds, pooled financing arrangements, and mechanisms provided by financial intermediary institutions.

Emphasis should be on local currency mechanisms to minimize exchange-rate risk.

Government subsidies remain indispensable. Government-subsidized entities, like national development banks, have proven effective for infrastructure financing in many developing countries. Experience shows government-subsidized institutions can help develop local credit markets.

B. Financing Access to Basic Utilities for All:General Conclusions (II)

17

Rather than crowding out investment, prudent public spending increases productive capacity and attracts private investment.

In long run, citizens pay for provision of services, either through taxes or user fees. In short run, however, full-cost recovery often not realistic, if utilities to be provided to poor.

More financial resources needed to help utilities invest in service extension and upgrade systems.

B. Financing Access to Basic Utilities for All:General conclusions (III)

18

Simplification, rationalization, and indexation of tariffs can help lower average charges to consumers and increase revenues.

Reductions in connection or reconnection fees can help reach the poor and increase the revenue base.

Increased focus on access subsidies, because they help extend networks and include poor, unconnected households.

Services should remain affordable to the poor. Cross-subsidies successful in many countries. Most effective where administered simply.

B. Financing Access to Basic Utilities for All:General conclusions (IV)

19

Outcome of Multi-Stakeholder Consultations

Outcome publications of multi-stakeholder consultations serve as substantive inputs to the Follow-up International Conference on Financing for Development (Doha, 29 November - 2 December 2008).

20

Thank you

For more information please consult FfD website at www.un.org/esa/ffd

or DESA website atwww.un.org/esa

Acknowlegements:Daniel Platz, FfDO, DESA, UN