multidisciplinary simulation of mechatronic components …mori, 1969] context ... main actors...
TRANSCRIPT
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 1
Multidisciplinary simulation of
mechatronic components in severe
environments
Jérémy Lefèvre1, Sébastien Charles2, Magali Bosch1, Benoît Eynard1 and
Manuel Henner3
1: Université de Technologie de Compiègne
2: Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin
3: Valeo Systèmes Thermiques
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010
Contact: [email protected]
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 2
Table of contents
1. Context1. EXPAMTION: a Mov’eo and System@tic project2. Problem statement
2. Lack of integration between mechatronic simulation and PLM
3. Proposed solution for integration1. Architecture2. Used tools
4. Conclusion and future works
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 3
Table of contents
1. Context1. EXPAMTION: a Mov’eo and System@tic project2. Problem statement
2. Lack of integration between mechatronic simulation and PLM
3. Proposed solution for integration1. Architecture2. Used tools
4. Conclusion and future works
• First time used in Japan 1969
– Mechanics
– Electronics
– Control
– ICT
[Choley, 2009]
[Mori, 1969]
Context
• 4 levels for system integration
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 4
Mechatronics
Separated Joined Included Merged
Maximum integration
4 fields merged
Universities
SimulationISVs
Context: EXPAMTION : Expérimentation d’une
infrastructure de simulation Partagée par tous les
Acteurs de la chaîne Mécatronique de
concepTION
EXPAMTION : Experimentation of a simulation
infrastructure shared by all actors of the
mechatronic design chain
Main actors
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 5
Context: EXPAMTIONMain project targets:
• Experiment a collaborative design methodology with ALL
actors of the supply chain using:
– Existing simulation software from the market
– Expertise, human resources, equipment, and software from all actors
to solve problems
• Meet major technical challenges in the automotive
mechatronic design process:
– Innovate in the design process
– Produce results unreachable with current non-collaborative design
process
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 6
Context: EXPAMTION
Project structure: 7 Work Packages
Actor of
project
Field of
study
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 7
WP1: Project Management
WP2: Major challenges
WP3: Software and Environment
WP4: Experimentation support
WP5: Optimization and codes adaptation
WP6: Training
WP7: Business Model
Mechanics
Rheologics
Aeroacoustics
Thermomechanics
Vibroacoustics
Application
The major challenges: multidisciplinary issues
Context: EXPAMTION
Collaborative simulation
platform
Unifying of computing
resources
Managing of secured rights
Simplifying licenses
management
Coupling simulation codes
Development time reduced for mechatronic products
Issues of the project
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 8
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 9
Table of contents
1. Context1. EXPAMTION: a Mov’eo and System@tic project2. Problem statement
2. Lack of integration between mechatronic simulation and PLM
3. Proposed solution for integration1. Architecture2. Used tools
4. Conclusion and future works
Context: problem statementMechatronic case study
Objectives: optimization of:
• Reliability
• Compliance of electronic characteristics
• Electrical performance
• Heat dissipation
• Environment interaction
How can we ensure that the card complies
with the specifications ?
Proposal: Multidisciplinary simulation
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 10
Multidisciplinary
simulation
Context: problem statementMechatronic case study: approach
Define electronic simulation
needs
Study dimension ?
Simulation processing
Results analysis and
synthesis
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 11
Multidisciplinary
simulation
Context: problem statementMechatronic case study: approach
Define electronic simulation
needs
Study dimension ?
Simulation processing
Results analysis and
synthesis
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 12
Requirements
• Operating at 120C at steady state
• Transient state analysis
• Critical temperature of 145C
• Etc.
Input data
• Electrical conductivity
• Thermal conductivity
• Nature of the components
• Etc.
Environment
• Infinite temperature
• Humidity
• Cooling
• Fluid characteristics
• Etc.
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 13
Table of contents
1. Context1. EXPAMTION: a Mov’eo and System@tic project2. Problem statement
2. Lack of integration between mechatronic simulation and PLM
3. Proposed solution for integration1. Architecture2. Used tools
4. Conclusion and future works
Enterprise solution for Knowledge Management of
Product Lifecycle
Strategic approach involving numerous digital tools
A new paradigm for a more effective products along their
life cycle
[Ameri & Dutta, 2005]
[CIMdata, 2002]
[Stark, 2004]
Some definitions of PLM concept:
Product Lifecycle ManagementPreliminary
designIndustrialization UsingLogisticManufacturing
Detail
design
End of
life
Proposed solution for integration: used tools
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 14
Simulation Lifecycle Management:
PLM for simulation
• Collaborative work
• Data sharing and management
• Business software integration
15
Lack of integration between mechatronics and PLM
Know how
aspect
Technical
aspect
CurrentlyNo PLM link
1 or 2 physics
IdeallyPLM linked (SLM)
3 and more physics
Mechanics
Electronics
Mechanics
Electronics
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 16
Table of contents
1. Context1. EXPAMTION: a Mov’eo and System@tic project2. Problem statement
2. Lack of integration between mechatronic simulation and PLM
3. Proposed solution for integration1. Architecture2. Used tools
4. Conclusion and future works
Proposed solution for integration: architectureIn the context of multidisciplinary analysis:
• The lack of interoperability between different
simulation software slows products development
Proposal:
PLM interoperability
based on standards
Coupling
Simulation 1
Simulation 2Simulation
3
DB
Simulation nodes
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 17
[Charles, 2005]
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 18
Table of contents
1. Context1. EXPAMTION: a Mov’eo and System@tic project2. Problem statement
2. Lack of integration between mechatronic simulation and PLM
3. Proposed solution for integration1. Architecture2. Used tools
4. Conclusion and future works
Proposed solution for integration: used tools
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 19
System
modeling
and
meshing
Simulation:
•Fluid (CFD)
•Thermoelectric
Simulation
interoperability
Data
exchangesPLM / SLM
•Modelica
•Altair HyperMesh
•SysML
•Ansys Fluent
•Intes Permas
•MpCCI code
coupling
•STEP (APxxx)
neutral format
•PLCS (STEP
AP239)
Needs
Tools
Integration in mechatronic approach
[Casella, 2009]
[Fritzson, 2006]
[Charles, 2005]
[Penas, 2009]
[Fraunhofer, 2009]
[Kadima, 2009]
Proposed solution for integration: architecture
Modeling
Modelica
HyperMesh
Simulation
Permas
MpCCI
Fluent
1D, 2D and 3D electronic card simulations
•Mechatronic
modeling
•Multidisciplinary
analysis
•Interoperability
0D / 1D
•3D Analysis
•Optimization
Define electronic simulation
needs
Study dimension ?
Simulation processing
Results analysis and
synthesis
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 20
3D
MpCCI architecture
Remeshing:
Loopback:
Code A
Code B
1 2 3
Iteration
A B
Proposed solution for integration: architectureStandard for the Exchange of Product model data
: Application Protocols
Integrated resources for mechatronic
design
Me
ch
an
ics
:
AP
20
3 a
nd
AP
21
4
Ele
ctro
nic
s:
AP
21
0 a
nd
AP
211
Life
cyc
le m
an
ag
em
en
t:
AP
23
9
Syste
m E
ng
ineerin
g T
oo
ls:
AP
23
3
Define electronic simulation
needs
Study dimension ?
Simulation processing
Results analysis and
synthesis
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 21
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 22
Table of contents
1. Context1. EXPAMTION: a Mov’eo and System@tic project2. Problem statement
2. Lack of integration between mechatronic simulation and PLM
3. Proposed solution for integration1. Architecture2. Used tools
4. Conclusion and future works
Simple
case
Whole
caseCase study Proposal
study
State of the art Application on
Valeo GMV cardValidation on complex
mechatronic product
Conclusion and future works
2010 20122011 2013
Integration of EXPAMTION and O2M methodologies for developing a
generic approach from requirements engineering to multidisciplinary
simulation dedicated to complex mechatronics systems
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 23
Questions
Thanks for your attention
For more information: http://www.itt-mecatronique.fr
Jérémy LEFÈVRE
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 24
References[Mori, 1969]: Mori T.: Company Yaskawa. Japan (1969).
[Choley, 2009]: Choley J.Y.: La mécanique et l’électronique deviennent mécatronique. Conférence Formation
Mécatronique Innovaxiom, Supméca, Paris (2009).
[Penas, 2009]: Penas O.: De la nécessité d’un outil PLM pour la mécatronique. Conférence Formation
Mécatronique Innovaxiom, Supméca, Paris (2009).
[Casella, 2009]: Casella F., Franke R., Olsson H., Otter M. and Sielemann M.: Modelica Language specification.
Version 3.1 (2009).
[Fritzson, 2006]: Fritzson P.: Principles of Object-oriented modeling and simulation with Modelica 2.1. IEEE, ISBN:
9780471471639 (2006).
[Fraunhofer SCAI, 2009]: Fraunhofer SCAI: MpCCI Manual. Version 4.0 (2009).
[Kobryn, 2004]: Kobryn C.: UML 3.0 and the future of modeling. 24 February 2004, Springer-Verlag (2004).
[Paredis, 2009]: Paredis C.: Model-Based Systems Engineering: Research Overview. UTC, Compiègne (2009).
[Kadima, 2009]: Kadima H.: SysML et simulation du comportement dynamique continu de systèmes complexes.
Conférence Formation Mécatronique Innovaxiom, Supméca, Paris (2009).
[Charles, 2005]: Charles S.: Integrated management of CAD and FEA data – towards a link between mechanical
design and structural analysis, Thesis, Université de technology de Troyes, Troyes (2005).
[Ameri & Dutta, 2005]: Ameri F. and Dutta D.: Product Lifecycle Management: Closing the Knowledge Loops.
Computer-Aided Design & Applications, Vol. 2, No. 5 (2005).
[CIMdata, 2007]: CIMdata: Eurostep’s Share-A-space: Product Lifecycle Collaboration through Information
Integration. Michigan, USA (2007).
[CIMdata, 2002]: CIMdata: Product lifecycle management. C Inc - CIMdata Report. Michigan, USA (2002).
[Stark, 2004]: Stark J.: Product Lifecycle Management: 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation. Springer
London Ltd, ISBN-13: 978-1852338107 (2004).
Complex Systems Design & Management 2010 25