multijurisdictional practice issues for traveling lawyers ethics michael_downey
DESCRIPTION
Today in-house counsel are expected to handle legal matters for clients all over the country. In this presentation, Michael Downey covers the limits on what lawyers may do in states where they are not licensed, as well as problems that may arise for both the attorney and client when a lawyer exceeds those limits.TRANSCRIPT
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Multijurisdictional Practice Issues for Traveling Lawyers
Michael Downey
June 2014
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Consequences of Unauthorized Practice
Criminal liability Discipline Civil liability (plus perhaps statutory fees and damages) (Greater) malpractice liability Privilege issues Fee forfeiture issues Invalidity of actions (e.g., invalid answer or notice of appeal)
2
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Today's Program
What is the practice of law Who can practice law Where can a lawyer practice Which rules/court regulate practice
Review
3
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
What is the Practice of Law?
4
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
"Practicing Law" – 3 Categories
Activities only lawyers can do (for someone else/for pay)• Appear in court
• Sign pleadings
• Take depositions
• Hold oneself out as a lawyer
Activities lawyers – and select professionals – can do Activities that, when done by a lawyer, constitute the
practice of law
5
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
ABA Effort to Define "Practice of Law"
2002 Commission ran into resistance from FTC Final recommendation in 2003:
• States should adopt own definition
• Include the "basic premise that the practice of law is the application of legal principles and judgment to the circumstances or objectives of another person or entity"
6
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Missouri Definition
It is "impossible to lay down an exhaustive definition of the 'practice of law.'" In re First Escrow, Inc., 840 S.W.2d 839, 843 n.6 (Mo. 1992)
7
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Missouri Statute – "Practice of Law"Mo. Rev. Stat. § 484.010.1 The "practice of law" is . . . defined to be and is
• the appearance as an advocate in a representative capacity or
• the drawing of papers, pleadings or documents or
• the performance of any act in such capacity in connection with proceedings pending or prospective before any court of record, commissioner, referee or any body, board, committee or commission constituted by law or having authority to settle controversies.
8
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Missouri Statute – "Law Business"Mo. Rev. Stat. § 484.010.1 The "law business" is . . . defined to be and is
• advising or counseling for a valuable consideration of any person, firm, association, or corporation as to any secular law or
• the drawing or the procuring of or assisting in the drawing for a valuable consideration of any paper, document or instrument affecting or relating to secular rights or
• the doing of any act for a valuable consideration in a representative capacity, obtaining or tending to obtain or securing or tending to secure for any person, firm, association or corporation any property or property rights whatsoever.
9
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
What Is Not the Practice of Law
Filling in forms – but helping select which form to use is likely the practice of law – MO Opinion 20000029
Reviewing lease to make sure it accurately states parties' agreement (without evaluating whether to add extra provisions) – MO Opinion 940126
Performing basic investigatory services like requesting and reviewing medical or police records – Mo Opinion 970045
Taking a sworn statement during an investigation – Mo Opinion 2003002
10
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Who Can Practice Law?
11
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Bar Admissions – Three-Steps
Legal Education or Substitute
Bar Examination or Substitute
Character & Fitness Examination
• ABA Accredited Law School
• (Foreign/non-approved law school plus practice)
•(Foreign/non-approved law school plus 24 credits at ABA-approved school)
• State bar examination
• Motion/reciprocity (5 of 10 prior years)
•In-house admission
•(Diploma privilege)
• Character and fitness examination
12
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Temporary Admission – Rule 8.06
Qualified for admission In good standing in another jurisdiction Seeking admission through another means Lasts up to one year (lost if other attempt at admission fails) Need supervising Missouri lawyer
(Very short, simple form)
13
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Other Means of Admission Pro hac vice admission Foreign legal consultants – only on the law of the jurisdiction
where the foreign legal consultant is admitted (Rule 9.05) Responding to disasters
14
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Reciprocity Issues
Many states limit practice to lawyers whose home states allow that state's lawyer to practice
Example: Missouri Rule 9.02 allows non-resident lawyers who are Missouri Bar members to practice only if the lawyer's home state allows non-resident bar admittees to practice
15
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Where can a lawyer practice?
16
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Practice Permitted
In state where licensed Before federal court (agency) where admitted In other jurisdictions where actions are "temporary"
and "permitted"
17
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Federal Courts
Supreme Court – special rule Appellate Courts – admitted to any other state or federal court District Courts – quite a lot of variation
18
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
19
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
"Multijurisdictional Practice"
Old – Simple rule (two principles) and precedent
New – Much more complicated rule
20
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Missouri Rule 4-5.5(a)
A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of
the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction,
or assist another in doing so
21
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
So, What is UPL? Rule 4-5.5(b)
A lawyer who is not admitted to practice in this jurisdiction shall not:
(1) except as authorized by this Rule 4 or other law, establish an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction for the practice of law; or
(2) hold out to the public or otherwise represent that the lawyer is admitted to practice law in this jurisdiction.
22
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Permitted "Temporary" Practice – Rule 4-5.5(c) A lawyer admitted and authorized to practice law in another United States jurisdiction
and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction may provide legal services on a temporary basis in this jurisdiction that:
(1) are undertaken in association with a lawyer who is admitted to practice in this jurisdiction and who actively participates in the matter;
(2) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential proceeding before a tribunal in this or another jurisdiction if the lawyer or a person the lawyer is assisting is authorized by law or order to appear in such proceeding or reasonably expects to be so authorized;
(3) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential arbitration, mediation, or other alternative dispute resolution proceeding in this or another jurisdiction if the services arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted and authorized to practice law and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission;
(4) . . .; or
(5) ….
23
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
A lawyer admitted and authorized to practice law in another United States jurisdiction and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction may provide legal services on a temporary basis in this jurisdiction that:
(1) …
(2) …
(3) …
(4) are provided to the lawyer's employer or its organizational affiliates and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission; or
(5) are not within Rule 4-5.5(c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4) and arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted and authorized to practice law.
24
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Summarizing Rule 4-5.5(c)
Temporary practice is permitted when
• Local counsel actively participates
• Pro hac vice has been obtained or is anticipated
• It is ADR and arises from jurisdiction where admitted
• Temporary practice by in-house lawyer
• "Arise out of and are reasonably related" to practice in jurisdiction of license
25
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Unauthorized v. Authorized Practice
Danger
Activities in jurisdiction
that probably equal UPL
Safety
Activities in jurisdiction that
are not UPL
26
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
What's on Continuum
Danger – Rule 4-5.5(b)
- Establishing Office
- Systematic & Continuous Presence
- Hold out as Lawyer in
Jurisdiction
Safety – Rule 4-5.5(c)
- Licensure (in-house, temporary, etc.)
"Temporary" practice –Local CounselPro Hac ViceArbitration
27
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Active Local Counsel A lawyer . . . may provide legal services on a temporary basis in
this jurisdiction that:
(1) are undertaken in association with a lawyer who is admitted to practice in this jurisdiction and who actively participates in the matter;
28
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Pro Hac Vice Admission A lawyer . . . may provide legal services on a temporary basis in
this jurisdiction that:
(1) …
(2) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential proceeding before a tribunal in this or another jurisdiction if the lawyer or a person the lawyer is assisting is authorized by law or order to appear in such proceeding or reasonably expects to be so authorized;
29
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Pro Hac Vice Rule
A lawyer seeking to appear pursuant to Rule 9.03 shall pay a fee equal to the fee paid by lawyers under Rule 6.01(j)(1), with the fee to be paid for each case in each court or administrative tribunal in which the lawyer seeks to appear.
The fee shall be paid to the clerk of this Court, who shall transfer the fee to The Missouri Bar as provided in Rule 6.07.
30
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
ADR Exception A lawyer . . . may provide legal services on a temporary basis in
this jurisdiction that:
(1) …
(2) …
(3) are in or reasonably related to a pending or potential arbitration, mediation, or other alternative dispute resolution proceeding in this or another jurisdiction if the services arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted and authorized to practice law and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission;
31
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
A lawyer admitted and authorized to practice law in another United States jurisdiction and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction may provide legal services on a temporary basis in this jurisdiction that:
(1) …
(2) …
(3) …
(4) are provided to the lawyer's employer or its organizational affiliates and are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission; or
(5) ….
In-House Counsel Exception
32
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
A lawyer admitted and authorized to practice law in another United States jurisdiction and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction may provide legal services on a temporary basis in this jurisdiction that:
(1) …
(2) …
(3) …
(4) …
(5) are not within Rule 4-5.5(c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4) and arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted and authorized to practice law.
"Arising Out of" Licensed Practice
33
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Case
Deposition
Deposition
34
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
"Federal Practice" Exception – Rule 4-5.5 cmt [4] Federal law, including but not limited to international treaties,
may require that a lawyer be permitted to practice in this jurisdiction. Federal law that admits a lawyer to appear in a federal court or other tribunal does not authorize a lawyer to establish an office or other systematic and continuous presence to engage in other aspects of the practice of law in this jurisdiction.
35
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
ABA Model Rule 5.5(d) A lawyer admitted in another United States jurisdiction or in a foreign
jurisdiction, and not disbarred or suspended from practice in any jurisdiction or the equivalent thereof, may provide legal services through an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction that :
(1) are provided to the lawyer's employer or its organizational affiliates; are not services for which the forum requires pro hac vice admission; and, when performed by a foreign lawyer and requires advice on the law of this or another jurisdiction or of the United States, such advice shall be based upon the advice of a lawyer who is duly licensed and authorized by the jurisdiction to provide such advice; or
(2) are services that the lawyer is authorized by federal or other law or rule to provide in this jurisdiction.
36
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Model Rule 5.5 comment [16]
To further decrease any risk to the client, when advising on the domestic law of a United States jurisdiction or on the law of the United States, the foreign lawyer authorized to practice under paragraph (d)(1) of this Rule needs to base that advice on the advice of a lawyer licensed and authorized by the jurisdiction consult with a U.S. lawyer authorized to provide it that advice.
37
Which Bar Can Discipline
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Missouri Rule 4-8.5(a)
A lawyer admitted to practice in this jurisdiction is subject to the disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction regardless of where the lawyer's conduct occurs.
A lawyer not admitted in this jurisdiction is also subject to the disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction if the lawyer provides or offers to provide any legal services in this jurisdiction.
A lawyer may be subject to the disciplinary authority of both this jurisdiction and other jurisdictions for the same conduct.
39
Which Rules Govern?
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Choice of Ethics Rules --
In any exercise of the disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction, the rules of professional conduct to be applied shall be as follows:
(1) for conduct in connection with a matter pending before a tribunal, the rules of the jurisdiction in which the tribunal sits, unless the rules of the tribunal provide otherwise; and
(2) for any other conduct, the rules of the jurisdiction in which the lawyer's conduct occurred or, if the predominant effect of the conduct is in a different jurisdiction, the rules of that jurisdiction.
41
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
"Safe Harbour" – Rule 4-8.5(a)
A lawyer shall not be subject to discipline if the lawyer's conduct conforms to the rules of a jurisdiction in which the lawyer reasonably believes the predominant effect of the lawyer's conduct will occur.
42
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Lawyer-Client Agreements – Model Rule 8.5 comment (Ethics 20/20) [5] When a lawyer's conduct involves significant contacts with
more than one jurisdiction, it may not be clear whether the predominant effect of the lawyer's conduct will occur in a jurisdiction other than the one in which the conduct occurred. . . . With respect to conflicts of interest, in determining a lawyer's reasonable belief under paragraph (b)(2), a written agreement between the lawyer and client that reasonably specifies a particular jurisdiction as within the scope of that paragraph may be considered if the agreement was obtained with the client's informed consent confirmed in the agreement.
43
Who Can Be Disciplined?
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Supervisory Responsibility – Rule 4-5.1
(a) A partner in a law firm, and a lawyer who individually or together with other lawyers possesses comparable managerial authority in a law firm, shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance that all lawyers in the firm conform to the Rules of Professional Conduct.
(b) A lawyer having direct supervisory authority over another lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the other lawyer conforms to the Rules of Professional Conduct.
45
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
"Vicarious" Liability – Rule 4-5.1(c)
(a) ….
(b) ….
(c) A lawyer shall be responsible for another lawyer's violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct if:
(1) the lawyer orders or, with knowledge of the specific conduct, ratifies the conduct involved; or
(2) the lawyer is a partner or has comparable managerial authority in the law firm in which the other lawyer practices, or has direct supervisory authority over the other lawyer, and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial action.
46
Review
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 1
Lawyer admitted only in Missouri Lawyer moves to office another state (say, Illinois) Lawyer begins to practice law from an office in that
other state Is this UPL?• What if Lawyer only works on cases pending in
Missouri?• What if Lawyer only works for Company XYZ as in-
house counsel?
48
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 2 In-House Counsel (IHC) is licensed only in Missouri While located in Missouri, IHC constantly
negotiates contracts with Company's employees in another state (Illinois)
IHC also handles all EEOC/State employment investigations
IHC will retain local counsel if litigation or a regulatory proceeding results
49
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 3
Lawyer licensed only in Missouri Client in Other State (Arkansas) calls and needs an
answer filed immediately in lawsuit pending in Other State (Arkansas)
Lawyer files answer in Other State along with request for pro hac vice admission
50
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 4
Lawyer is licensed only in Missouri Lawyer moves to Colorado to do non-legal work for
Corporate Employer Friend in Colorado asks Lawyer to review a mineral
lease
Based on Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bolte (Wis. 2005)
51
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 5
Lawyer licensed in Missouri is litigating case pending in Missouri
Lawyer needs to depose or interview witness in Other State (Delaware)
Lawyer licensed in Other State (Delaware) represents witness
Who needs to worry about UPL? Whose rules apply?
52
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 6
Lawyer is licensed only in Missouri Lawyer moves to Michigan and opens office only to
practice federal bankruptcy litigation
Key cases – Sperry v. Florida Bar (US 1963) In re Desilets, 247 B.R. 660 (Bankr. W.D. Mich 2000),
aff'd, Rittenhouse v. Delta Home Improvement, Inc., 255 B.R. 294 (W.D. Mich. 2000)
53
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 7
In-House Counsel is licensed only in Missouri Company has case pending in Other State In-House Counsel works on case including
investigation, meeting to discuss settlement, and taking depositions
54
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 8 Other State Firm (OSF) has litigation in Missouri OSF has no lawyers licensed in Missouri, so OSF hires local
counsel in Missouri (just to sign and file pleadings) OSF Firm prepares brief that misstates governing law Missouri lawyer signs and files brief
Has anyone engaged in UPL? Who is responsible for misstatement of the law?
Based on In re Wilkins (Ind. 2002)
55
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 9
Missouri Firm has no attorneys licensed in Other State Client in Other State hires Missouri Firm to conduct
internal investigation in Other State Is this UPL in Other State?
Based on Decker, Hallman, Barber & Briggs matter
56
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Scenario 10
Lawyer is licensed only in Missouri Lawyer receives case likely to be filed in Other State
for Missouri client Lawyer travels to Other State many times to meet
with client and investigate claim Lawyer settles matter before filing suit in Missouri
Was this UPL?
57
Trends in Other Jurisdictions
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Virginia New UPL Law
(C) Definition of "Non-lawyer." – the term "non-lawyer" means any person, firm, association or corporation not duly licensed or authorized to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia. However, any lawyer not licensed to practice law in Virginia, but licensed in any other state or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, or a foreign nation, who provides legal advice or services to clients in Virginia, shall not be subject to these Unauthorized Practice rules but shall be subject to the laws, rules and regulations of the jurisdiction(s) in which he/she is licensed to practice, as well as otherwise applicable Virginia Law including the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct.
(D) The Unauthorized Practice rules which follow represent a nonexclusive list of specific types of practice which would violate these rules.
January 11, 2010
59
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Other States on UPL District of Columbia Court of Appeals Rule 49(c)(6) expressly
exempts "[p]roviding legal advice only to one's regular employer, where the employer does not reasonably expect that it is receiving advice from a person authorized to practice law in the District of Columbia" from conduct that constitutes the unauthorized practice of law.
North Carolina generally provides under State v. Pledger (NC 1962) and its progeny that a corporate employee is not practicing law as long as (a) the corporate employer has a primary interest in the matter and (b) the work does not involve appearing in court, other than small claims court.
60
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Possible Changes
GATS – General Agreement on Trade in Services – impact on licensure?
Federalization of Bar Admissions and Regulation• Securities lawyers• Gramm-Leech Bliley and FTC Red Flags
61
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Litigation over MJP NAAMJP v. Simandle (D.N.J. June 9, 2014) – challenging NJ federal court local rule
for admitting only NJ-admitted attorneys to NJ federal court
• Exceptions to NJ Rule – resident patent attorneys, criminal defense attorneys
NAAMJP v. Roberts (D.D.C. 2013) – challenging DC federal local court rule for admitting only those licensed in states that give reciprocity to DC lawyers to DC federal court
• 25 of 94 courts (15 states)
NAAMJP v. Castille (E.D. Pa. 2013) -- challenging PA federal local court rule for admitting only those licensed in states that give reciprocity to PA lawyers to PA federal court
• 38 states plus DC
62
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Thank You
Michael Downey Armstrong Teasdale LLP 314-342-8072 (extension 7032) [email protected]
63