multiple investment alternatives sensitivity analysis
TRANSCRIPT
Multiple Investment AlternativesSensitivity
Analysis
ENGM 661
Given two or more investment alternatives, be able to identify the mutually exclusive alternatives.
Given two or more mutually exclusive investment alternatives, be able to determine the best alternative by the present worth method the annual worth method the incremental rate-of-return
Given a problem description, be able the breakeven point between two or more investment alternatives.
Given a cash flow, be able to perform a sensitivity analysis on one or two parameters of the cash flow.
Learning Objectives for tonight:
NPW > 0 Good Investment
EUAW > 0 Good Investment
IRR > MARR Good Investment
Note: If NPW > 0 EUAW > 0IRR > MARR
Summary
NPWA > NPWB Choose AMust use same planning horizon
EUAWA > EUAWB Choose ASame Planning Horizon implicit in computation
IRRA > IRRB Choose AMust use Incremental Rate-of-Return IRRB-A < MARR Choose A
Multiple Investments
Suppose we have two projects, A & B A B
Initial cost $50,000 $80,000Annual maintenance 1,000 3,000Increased productivity 10,000 15,000Life 10 10Salvage 10,000 20,000
Example
A
NPW(10) = -50 + 9(P/A,10,10) + 10(P/F,10,10)
Present Worth A
50
99
10
0
1 2 3 10
. . .
B
Present Worth B
80
1212
20
0
1 2 3 10
. . .
NPW(10) = -80 + 12(P/A,10,10) + 20(P/F,10,10)
NPWA > NPWB
Choose A
Conclusion
Equivalent Worth
50
99
10
0
1 2 3 10
. . .A
EUAW(10) = -50(A/P,10,10) + 9 + 10(A/F,10,10)
Equivalent Worth
1212
20
0
1 2 3 10
. . .B
EUAW(10) = -80(A/P,10,10) + 12 + 20(A/F,10,10)
Conclusion
EUAWA > EUAWB
Choose A
Example: Suppose MARR is 10%. Suppose also that we can invest in T-bill @15% or we can invest in a 5 year automation plan.
Different Planning Horizons
100
115
NPW = 115(1.1)-1 - 100= $4,545
100
30
51 2 3 4
NPW = 30(P/A,10,5) - 100= $13,724
A B
B
But this ignores reinvestment of T-bills for full5-year period.
Problem
0
5
100
201,135
NPW = 201.135(P/F,10,5) - 100= $24,889 A
Projects must becompared using same
Planning Horizon
Conclusion
Example; NPW
4,000
3
3,5004,500
A
NPW = -4 + 3.5(P/A, 10,3) + 4.5(P/F,10,3)
= -4 + 3.5(2.4869) + 4.5(.7513)
= 8.085
= $8,085
Example: NPW
5,000
3
3,000
5,000
6
B
NPW = -5 + 3(P/A,10,6) + 5(P/F,10,6)
Example: NPW
5,000
3
3,000
5,000
6
B
NPW = -5 + 3(P/A,10,6) + 5(P/F,10,6)
= -5 + 3(4.3553) + 5(.5645)
Example: NPW
5,000
3
3,000
5,000
6
B
NPW = -5 + 3(P/A,10,6) + 5(P/F,10,6)
= -5 + 3(4.3553) + 5(.5645)
= 10.888
= $10,888
Least Common MultipleShortest LifeLongest LifeStandard Planning Horizon
Planning Horizons
Example; NPW
A
4,000
3
3,5004,500
4,000
6
4,500
NPW = -4 -4(P/F,10,3) + 3.5(P/A,10,6) + 4.5(P/F,10,3)
+ 4.5(P/F,10,6)
Example: NPW
5,000
3
3,000
5,000
6
B
NPW = -5 + 3(P/A,10,6) + 5(P/F,10,6)
NPWA > NPWB
Choose A
Conclusion
EUAW
4,000
3
3,5004,500
A
EUAW = -4(A/P,10,3) + 3.5 + 4.5(A/F,10,3)
= -4(.4021) + 3.5 + 4.5(.3021)
= 3.251
= $3,251
Note: NPW = 3,251(P/A,10,6) = 3,251(4.3553) = $14,159
EUAW
5,000
3
3,000
5,000
6
B
EUAW = -5(A/P,10,6) + 3 + 5(A/F,10,6)
= -5(.2296) + 3 + 5(.1296)
= 2.500
= $2,500
Note: NPW = 2,500(P/A,10,6) = $10,888
Equivalent Uniform Annual Worth method implicitly assumes that you are comparing alternatives on a least common multiple planning horizon
EUAW
Two alternatives for a recreational facility are being considered. Their cash flow profiles are as follows. Using a MARR of 10%, select the preferred alternative.
Class Problem
EOY CF(A) CF(B)0 -11000 -50001 5000 20002 4000 30003 3000 40004 20005 1000
Critical Thinking
1 2 3 4 5
11
54
32
1A
B
1 2 3
5
432
Use Net Present Worth and least common multiple of lives to compare alternatives A & B.
Critical Thinking
1 2 3 4 5
11
54
32
1A
B
1 2 3
5
432
Use Net Present Worth and least common multiple of lives to compare alternatives A & B.
NPWA = 288(P/A,10,15)= 288(7.6061)= $2,191
NPWB = 926(P/A,10,15)= 926(7.6061)= $7,043
Spreadsheet123456789
1011121314151617181920212223
C D E
MARR = 10.0%
EOY CF(A) CF(B)0 (11,000) (5,000)1 5,000 2,0002 4,000 3,0003 3,000 (1,000)4 2,000 2,0005 (10,000) 3,0006 5,000 (1,000)7 4,000 2,0008 3,000 3,0009 2,000 (1,000)10 (10,000) 2,00011 5,000 3,00012 4,000 (1,000)13 3,000 2,00014 2,000 3,00015 1,000 4,000
NPV = 2,191 7,043PMT = 288 926
=NPV(E1,D5:D19)+D4 =-PMT($E1,15,D20)
Suppose we have two investment alternatives
Incremental Analysis
A
100
110
1
IRRA = 10%
B
200
226
1
IRRB = 13%
Suppose we have two investment alternatives
Incremental Analysis
A B
100
110
200
226
1 1
IRRA = 10% IRRB = 13%
IRRB > IRRA Choose B
Correction
Investment alternative B costs $200. If we foregoB for $100 invested in A, we have an extra $100 which can be invested at MARR. If MARR = 20%,
Correction
Investment alternative B costs $200. If we foregoB for $100 invested in A, we have an extra $100 which can be invested at MARR. If MARR = 20%,
A
100
110
1
IRRA = 15%
+
100
120
1=
200
230
1
Correction
B
200
226
1
IRRB = 13%
IRRA > IRRB Choose A
200
230
1
A
IRRA = 15%
Suppose we have $100,000 to spend and we have two mutually exclusive investment alternatives both of which yield returns greater than MARR = 15%.
Example 2
A
50,000
60,000
1
IRRA = 20%
B
90,000
106,200
1
IRRB = 18%
Example 2
A
50,000
60,000
1
IRRA = 20%
B
90,000
106,200
1
IRRB = 18%
IRRA > IRRB Choose A
Example 2
A
50,000
60,000
1
NPWA = -50 + 60(1.15)-1
= $2,170
B
90,000
106,200
1
NPWB = -90 + 106.2(1.15)-1
= $2,350
NPWB > NPWA Choose B
Remember, we have $100,000 available in funds so we could spend an additional $50,000 above alternative A or an additional $10,000 above alternative B. If we assume we can make MARR or 15% return on our money, then
Example 2
Example 2
if we invest in A, we have an extra $50,000 which can be invested at MARR (15%).
A
50,000
60,000
1
i = 20%
50,000
57,500
1
i = 15%
+ =
100,000
117,500
1
ic = 17.5%
Example 2
If we invest in B, we have an extra $10,000 which can be invested at MARR (15%).
B
90,000
106,200
1
i = 18%
10,000
11,500
1
i = 15%
+ =
100,000
117,700
1
ic = 17.7%
Example 2
B
100,000
117,700
1
IRRB = 17.7%
IRRcB > IRRcA Choose B
100,000
117,500
1
A
IRRA = 17.5%
Incremental Analysis
Incremental AnalysisMARR = 15%
t Drill X Drill Y Drill Z Y-X X-Y Z-X Z-Y
0 -39,000 -26,000 -45,000 13,000 -13,000 -6,000 -19,000
1 -12,000 -15,000 -9,000 -3,000 3,000 3,000 6,000
2 -12,000 -15,000 -9,000 -3,000 3,000 3,000 6,000
3 -12,000 -15,000 -9,000 -3,000 3,000 3,000 6,000
4 -12,000 -15,000 -9,000 -3,000 3,000 3,000 6,000
5 -5,000 -11,000 1,000 -6,000 6,000 6,000 12,000
NPW = ($75,746) ($74,294) ($70,198) $1,452 ($1,452) $5,548 $4,096
IRR = #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! 11% 11% 46% 23%
Differing Planning Horizons
Incremental AnalysisOption O B C
Initial Cost 0 9,000 12,000Net Cash 0 0 0Salvage 0 500 1,000
Life 0 4 8
Differing Planning Horizons
Cash Flows MARR = 15%
Period B C B2 C-B20 -9,000 -12,000 -9,000 -3,0001 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 04 500 0 -8,500 8,5005 0 0 06 0 0 07 0 0 08 1,000 500 500
IRR = #NUM! #NUM! #NUM! 30%NPV = ($8,500) ($11,000) ($17,000) $6,000
EUAW = (2,125) (1,375) (2,125) 750
ENGM 661Engineering Economics
forManagers
Break Even &Sensitivity
Motivation
Suppose that by investing in a new information system, management believes they can reduce inventory costs. Your boss asks you to figure out if it should be done.
Motivation
Suppose that by investing in a new information system, management believes they can reduce inventory costs. After talking with software vendors and company accountants you arrive at the following cash flow diagram.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
25,000
i = 15%
Motivation
Suppose that by investing in a new information system, management believes they can reduce inventory costs. After talking with software vendors and company accountants you arrive at the following cash flow diagram.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
25,000
NPW = -100 + 25(P/A,15,5) = -16,196
i = 15%
Motivation
Suppose that by investing in a new information system, management believes they can reduce inventory costs. After talking with software vendors and company accountants you arrive at the following cash flow diagram.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
25,000
NPW = -100 + 25(P/A,15,5) = -16,196
i = 15%
Motivation
Boss indicates $25,000 per year savings is too low & is based on current depressed market. Suggests that perhaps $40,000 is more appropriate based on a more aggressive market.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
40,000
Motivation
Boss indicates $25,000 per year savings is too low & is based on current depressed market. Suggests that perhaps $40,000 is more appropriate based on a more aggressive market.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
40,000
NPW = -100 + 40(P/A,15,5) = 34,086
Motivation
Boss indicates $25,000 per year savings is too low & is based on current depressed market. Suggests that perhaps $40,000 is more appropriate based on a more aggressive market.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
40,000
NPW = -100 + 40(P/A,15,5) = 34,086
Motivation
Tell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss indicates that perhaps he was a bit hasty. Sales have fallen a bit below marketing forecast, perhaps a 32,000 savings would be more appropriate
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
32,000
Motivation
Tell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss indicates that perhaps he was a bit hasty. Sales have fallen a bit below marketing forecast, perhaps a 32,000 savings would be more appropriate
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
32,000
NPW = -100 + 32(P/A,15,5) = 7,269
Motivation
Tell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss indicates that perhaps he was a bit hasty. Sales have fallen a bit below marketing forecast, perhaps a 32,000 savings would be more appropriate
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
32,000
NPW = -100 + 32(P/A,15,5) = 7,269
Motivation
Tell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss leans back in his chair and says, you know . . . .
Motivation
Tell your boss, new numbers indicate a go. Boss leans back in his chair and says, you know . . . .
I’ll do anything, justtell me what numbersyou want to use!
Motivation
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
A
NPW = -100 + A(P/A,15,5) > 0
Motivation
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
A
NPW = -100 + A(P/A,15,5) > 0
A > 100/(A/P,15,5) > 29,830
A < 29,830
A > 29,830
Motivation
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
A
Break-Even Analysis
Site Fixed Cost/Yr Variable CostA=Austin $ 20,000 $ 50 S= Sioux Falls 60,000 40 D=Denver 80,000 30
TC = FC + VC * X
Break-Even (cont)
Break-Even Analysis
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
Volume
Tota
l C
ost
Austin
S. Falls
Denver
Class Problem A firm is considering a new product line and the following data have been recorded:
Sales price $ 15 / unitCost of Capital $300,000Overhead $ 50,000 / yr.Oper/maint. $ 50 / hr.Material Cost $ 5 / unitProduction 50 hrs / 1,000 unitsPlanning Horizon 5 yrs.MARR 15%
Compute the break even point.
Class Problem
Profit Margin = Sale Price - Material - Labor/Oper.
= $15 - 5 - $50 / hr
= $ 7.50 / unit
50 hrs1000 units
Class Problem
Profit Margin = Sale Price - Material - Labor/Oper.
= $15 - 5 - $25 / hr
= $ 7.50 / unit
50 hrs1000 units
1 2 3 4 5
300,000
7.5X
50,000
Class Problem
Profit Margin = Sale Price - Material - Labor/Oper.
= $15 - 5 - $25 / hr
= $ 7.50 / unit
50 hrs1000 units
1 2 3 4 5
300,000
7.5X
50,000
300,000(A/P,15,5) + 50,000 = 7.5X
139,495 = 7.5X
X = 18,600
Suppose we consider the following cash flow diagram:
NPW = -100 + 35(P/A,15,5) = $ 17,325
Sensitivity
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
35,000
i = 15%
Suppose we don’t know A=35,000 exactly but believe we can estimate it within some percentage error of + X.
Sensitivity
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
35,000(1+X) i = 15%
Then,
EUAW = -100(A/P,15,5) + 35(1+X) > 0
35(1+X) > 100(.2983)
X > -0.148
Sensitivity
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
35,000(1+X)
i = 15%
Sensitivity (cont.)
NPV vs. Errors in A
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20
Error X
NP
V
Now suppose we believe that the initial investment might be off by some amount X.
Sensitivity (Ao)
1 2 3 4 5
100,000(1+X)
35,000
i = 15%
Sensitivity (Ao)
NPV vs Initial Cost Errors
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20
Error X
NP
V
Sensitivity (A & Ao)
NPV vs Errors
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20
Error X
NP
V
Errors in initial cost
Errors in Annual receipts
Now suppose we believe that the planning horizon might be shorter or longer than we expected.
Sensitivity (PH)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
100,000
35,000i = 15%
Sensitivity (PH)
NPV vs Planning Horizon
(30,000)
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
NPV
PH
Sensitivity (Ind. Changes)NPV vs Errors
(20,000)
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20
Error X
NP
V
Errors in initial cost
Errors in Annual receipts
n=3
n=7
Planning Horizon
MARR
Multivariable Sensitivity
Suppose our net revenue is composed of $50,000 in annual revenues which have an error of X and $20,000 in annual maint. costs which might have an error of Y (i=15%).
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)
Multivariable Sensitivity
Suppose our net revenue is compose of $50,000 in annual revenues which have an error of X and $20,000 in annual maint. costs which might have an error of Y (i=15%).
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)
Multivariable SensitivitySuppose our net revenue is compose of $50,000 in annualrevenues which have an error of X and $20,000 in annualmaint. costs which might have an error of Y.
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)
You Solve It!!!
You Solve It!!!
Multivariable Sensitivity
EUAW = -100(A/P,15,5) + 50(1+X) - 20(1+Y) > 0
50(1+X) - 20(1+Y) > 29.83
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)
Multivariable Sensitivity
EUAW = -100(A/P,15,5) + 50(1+X) - 20(1+Y) > 0
50(1+X) - 20(1+Y) > 29.83
50X - 20Y > -0.17
X > 0.4Y - 0.003
1 2 3 4 5
100,000
50,000(1+X)
20,000(1+Y)
Multivariable SensitivitySimultaneous Errors (Rev. vs. Cost)
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
-0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15
Error X
Err
or Y
Unfavorable
Favorable
+ 10%
Mutually Exclusive Alt.
Suppose we work for an entity in which the MARR is not specifically stated and there is some uncertainty as to which value to use. Suppose also we have the following cash flows for 3 mutually exclusive alternatives.t A1t A2t A3t
0 (50,000) (75,000) (100,000)1 18,000 25,000 32,000 2 18,000 25,000 32,000 3 18,000 25,000 32,000 4 18,000 25,000 32,000 5 18,000 25,000 32,000
Mutually Exclusive Alt.t A1t A2t A3t
0 (50,000) (75,000) (100,000)1 18,000 25,000 32,000 2 18,000 25,000 32,000 3 18,000 25,000 32,000 4 18,000 25,000 32,000 5 18,000 25,000 32,000 MARR = NPV1 NPV2 NPV3
4.0% 30,133 36,296 42,458 6.0% 25,823 30,309 34,796 8.0% 21,869 24,818 27,767 10.0% 18,234 19,770 21,305 12.0% 14,886 15,119 15,353 14.0% 11,795 10,827 9,859 16.0% 8,937 6,857 4,777 18.0% 6,289 3,179 69 20.0% 3,831 (235) (4,300)
Mutually Exclusive Alt.
NPV vs. MARR
(10,000)
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
MARR
NP
V
NPV1
NPV2
NPV3