“Multisubject, Multimodal Demo Dataset”

Henson et al (2011) Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceWakeman & Henson (in prep)

ftp://ftp.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/personal/rik.henson/wakemandg_hensonrn/

16 Subjects

Each subject did 2 Experiments (2 visits):1. MEG + EEG2. fMRI + MRI

EEG = 70 channels, nose-reference (concurrent with MEG)MEG = 102 magnetometers + 204 planar gradiometers (Neuromag)

fMRI = BOLD EPI 3x3x3 (3T Siemens Trio)MRI = T1 MPRAGE 1x1x1

(Also available: DTI data on 11 of the 16 subjectsFLASH data on all 16 subjects (head modelling))Empty-room MEG datasetsRaw stimuli and processing scriptsExtra 5 subjects with incomplete data)

Each experiment had 3 types of grayscale faces:FamousUnfamiliar (previously unseen)Phase-scrambled versions of above

300 trials of each (ie 900 in total, split across 6 (MEEG) or 9 (fMRI) runs)

Subjects judged left-right symmetry of each

(Soon to be a chapter in SPM12 manual, together with example scripts)

Time

“Multisubject, Multimodal Demo Dataset”

Henson et al (2011) Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceWakeman & Henson (in prep)

ftp://ftp.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/personal/rik.henson/wakemandg_hensonrn/

Demo Plan for Today:

1.Illustrate Scalp-Time Stats across Trials within One Subject

2.Illustrate Time-Freq Stats across 16 Subjects

<break?>

3.Illustrate Source Reconstruction and Stats across 16 Subjects

subject):Famous

subject):Unfamiliar

subject):Scramble

Po

ten

tial

Dif

fere

nce

rel

ativ

e to

ave

rag

e o

ver

elec

tro

des

(V

)