mutation breeding ppt
TRANSCRIPT
Mutation Breeding
By- SHRIKANT YANKANCHI
2
Introduction
Micro- and Macro-mutations
Procedures for micro mutations
breeding/polygenic
Handling of segregating population
Screening/selection
Breeding for A Biotic and Biotic stress
Methods for Validation of mutants
Achievements of mutation breeding
Advantages and limitations of breeding
Contents......
3
IntroductionThe term mutation breeding (‘Mutationszüchtung’) was first coined by Freisleben and Lein (1944) He referred mutation breeding as the deliberate induction and development of mutant lines for crop improvementMilestones in mutation breeding300BC- The ancient Chinese book “Lulan” provides the first documentation of mutant selection in plant breeding: maturity and other trait in cereals in China (Huang and Liang, 1980)1590 - The first verifiable (spontaneous) plant mutant described, ‘incisa’ mutant of greater celandine
4
1667 -The first known description of a graft-chimera; Bizarria-orange, Florence, Italy1901-1904 - de Vries suggests and promotes radiation to induce mutations in plants and animals1907-Cramer publishes extensive examples of spontaneous mutants in crop plants1927 - First proof of induced mutations in plants; radium ray treatment of Datura stramonium (Gager and Blakeslee)1927 - Muller working with Drosphila provides proof of mutation induction by X-rays Muller champions induced mutation for animal and plant breeding and opens a new era in genetics and breeding1928 Stadler publishes the first results of mutation induction in crop plants, barley, maize, wheat and oat, but is sceptical about the use of induced mutation for crop improvement
5
1936 The first induced mutant variety is released, tobacco var. ‘Chlorina’ using X-rays in Indonesia (then the Dutch East Indes)1942 First report of induced disease resistance in a crop plant; X-ray induced mildew resistance in barley (Freisleben and Lein, 1942)1944/46 First reports of chemical induced mutation (Auerbach and Robson, 1944)1949 First plant mutation experiments using 60Co gamma ray installations1954 The first release of a mutant variety in a vegetatively propagated crop: tulip var. Faraday with an improved flower colour and pattern (see van Harten and Broertjes, 1989)2000-2009 Development of high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping using automated, robotic and computerised systems2000 onwards Development of TILLING populations
6
Mutations called micro- and macro-mutations
depending on the magnitude of phenotypic effect
produced by them
Macromutation
produces a large phenotypic effect
easily recognizable on individual plant basis
Oligogenic in nature
Can be easily selected in M2 generation
Micro- and Macro-mutations
Micromutations
Produces Small phenotypic effect
Cannot be recognizable on individual plant basis
Detected only in group of plants and need treatment of
statistical data
Polygenic nature and selection delays till M3
Procedures for micro mutations
breeding/polygenic
9
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6-M8
M9
i. Mutagen -treated seeds space plantedii. Seeds from individual plants harvested separately
i. Individual plant progenies are grown ii. Fertile, vigorous, normal looking plants harvested separately
i. Individual plant progenies from selected plants grown ii. Superior plants selected from superior progenies showing segregationiii. Homogeneous mutant progenies may be harvested in bulki. Individual plant progenies from selected plants grown ii. Superior homogeneous lines harvested in bulk
i. Preliminary yield trial with a suitable check ii. Superior lines selected
i. Multi-location yield trialii. Outstanding line released as new variety
i. Seed multiplication for distribution
10
1.Selection of the variety for Mutagen treatment
It should be the
best variety available in
crop
Seed shold be pure
Oladosu et al, 2016
2. Part of the plant to be treated
Seeds
Pollen grains
Vegetative propagules
Corns
bulbs
complete plants
12
Mutagen Treatments
reduces germination
growth rate
vigour &
fertility
Mutagens generally induce a high frequency of chromosomal
changes and meiotic and mitotic irregularities
3. Dose of mutagen
13
Optimum mutagen dose is one, which produces maximum
frequency of mutations and causes the minimum killing
Close to LD50 dose is optimum
Varies with crops eg:- 46 krad for Vicia faba , 120-140 krad
for Brassica napus
varies with mutagens
eg: EMS – 0.3-1.5 %, for 2-6 hours
14
Optimum dose rate of physical and chemical mutagens for seed treatment of cereals
Handling of segregating population
M1 generation
Seeds treated with chemical mutagens should be
washed thoroughly and be planted as soon as possible
Large M1 generation is raised from treated seeds
(Wider spacing)
E.g :- 25,000 plants are to be grown to obtain a
useful mutation in M1 generation
Mutagens with high mutation frequency - M1
generation size can be reducedR. Roychowdhury and J. Tah., 2013
Continued......
The M1 plants should not be allowed to cross pollinate
M1 population should be planted 75-100 m apart
from the parental or other genotypes of the same
crop species
Mechanical isolation
M1 generation Dominant mutations are selected
each plant selfed and harvested separately for M2
M2 generation
Two methods of sowing M2 generation can be
followed
M1 plant to row where all seeds produced from a
single plant are grown in row
M1 spike or branch to row,
Oligogenic mutants with distinct features are
identified and selected
Screening/selection
Mainly three types screening/selection techniques in
M2 and subsequent generation
i) Visual
ii) Mechanical/Physical
iii) Other methods
i) Visual screening
-most effective and efficient method for
identifying mutant phenotypes
-Visual selection often is the prime basis for
selecting for disease resistance, earliness,
plant height, colour changes, ion-shattering,
adaptation to soil, climate, growing period etc.
ii) Mechanical/Physical-Very efficient for seed size, shape, weight, density,
etc., using appropriate sieving machinery
Iii) Other methodschemical, biochemical, physiological etc.
E.g.- Low alkaloid content mutants can be
selected using colorimetric tests
-chromatographic or electrophoresis techniques
may be used to select isolate protein variants
21
Methods for Validation of mutants
Genome-wide chips
Difference screening
Microarray
PCR screening
TILLING and ECO-TILLING
Mutation breeding for Biotic and Abiotic stress
Methods for generating mutant varieties
mutagenesis
Forward genetics-chemicals-radiation
Reverse geneticsInsertional mutagenesis - Agrobacterium mediated
transformation- Virus induced gene silencing- RNA mediated interference- transposon tagging
TILLINGNext generation sequencing
Breeding for disease resistance
Numerous mutants have been developed through
mutation induction, showing enhanced resistance to
various diseases (virus, bacterial, and to some extent
fungi)
E.g.: locus (ml-o) - located on the short arm of chromosome 4H in barley
Induced mutations at the locus confers resistance to
powdery mildew and barley yellow mosaic virusChen et al, 2014
Quality, nutrition and functionality
starch, protein, fatty acid, vitamins, etc. Elimination of undesired substances such as anti-nutritional factors Raising or lowering the concentration of specific substances such as fatty acidsThrough mutation is by inducing knock-outs in genes involved in the metabolic pathways Eg : high quality edible oil of canola was achieved by lowering the levels of glucosinolates and the erucic acid by gene knock outs induced by gamma ray irradiation
Achievements of mutation breeding
Distribution of mutant crop varieties by continents
IAEA mutant database, http://mvgs.iaea.org (2015)
28
Number of mutant varieties released in the world
https://mvd.iaea.org/#!Search?page=1&size=15&sortby=Name&sort=ASC&Criteria[0][field]=Country&Criteria[0][val]=136
Officially released mutant varieties in the FAO/IAEA Mutant Varieties Database, July
2015
INDIA Mutant cultivars
popular mutant cultivars of chickpea developed in India
Variety Release year Main improved attributes
Pusa-408 (Ajay) 1985, Resistant to Ascochyta blight, high yield, profuse branching, semi erect, maturity 140-155 d
Pusa-413 (Atul) 1985, Resistant to Fusarium wilt, stunt virus & foot rot, high yield,profuse branching, semi erect, maturity 130-140 days
Pusa-417 (Girnar) 1985, High resistance to Fusarium wilt& moderate resistance to Ascochyta blight, stunt virus, high yield, profuse branching, maturity 110-130 days
Kharkwal M. C. et al (1985)
Leading rice varieties obtained by mutation breeding
Mutant rice varieties released in India for cultivation
Gamma radiation-induced rice mutants were released in India as high-yielding varieties under the series ‘PNR’.
Two early ripening and aromatic mutation- derived rice varieties ‘PNR381’ and ‘PNR102’ currently popular in Haryana and UP
Mutant Varieties database https://mvd.iaea.org/#!Home
The primary research centres and institutes in India that participated in
the development and release of various mutants
Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI)-
New delhi
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre- Mumbai
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University –TN and
National Botanical Research Institute –
Lucknow, UP
AdvantagesPossible to achieve instant progress in elite materialSingle trait improvements can be made to an established variety preferred by producers, processors and/or consumersLimited breeding effort requiredNovel variation can be producedSingle gene mutants with no negative pleiotropic effects are possibleFor some mutagenic treatments such as gamma and X-ray, there is neither residual radiation nor chemical contamination of the treated material. The treated material is safe to handleSpecific genes/traits can be targetedPossible to calculate chances of success (mutation frequency)
Limitations...
The process is generally random and unpredictable Useful mutants are rare and predominantly recessive Large population sizes and effective mass screening methods are required to select rare mutants Mutants can have strong negative pleiotropic effects on other traits
Continued.....
Health risks: handling, chemical mutagens; radiations, fast neutrons treatments Most mutants are of no use to breeding even if a large number of mutants can be produced Field trialling and germplasm storage can be expensive and require a lot of space and careful management if large mutant populations are handled
References....Text books
Plant breeding – B. D. Singh Plant Mutation Breeding and Biotechnology
- Edited by Q.Y. Shu, B. P. Forster, H. Nakagawa
Review papers Principle and application of plant
mutagenesis in crop improvement: a review – By Oladosu et al., 2015 Mutagenesis - By Rajnikant Mishra (2012)
Thank
you