myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (george...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (George Sorel 1990:19). Myth “functions as a timeless model”, which](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56649ee65503460f94bf605e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (George Sorel 1990:19). Myth “functions as a timeless model”, which](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56649ee65503460f94bf605e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (George Sorel 1990:19).
• Myth “functions as a timeless model”, which “deprives historical phenomena of their specificity and transforms them to [sic] omnipotent patterns” (Törnquist – Plewa 1992:14).
• Myth as “a tale concerned with past events, giving them a special meaning and significance for the present and thereby reinforcing the authority of those who are wielding power in a particular community” (Friedrich and Brzezinski 1961: 99).
![Page 3: Myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (George Sorel 1990:19). Myth “functions as a timeless model”, which](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56649ee65503460f94bf605e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Integrative function: Myth - an instrument of self definition for the community (Schöpflin, 1997: 22), stronger ties within group, clear boundaries towards the out-groups
• Cognitive function: Mythical thinking is an instrument of chaos control, of introducing some regularity into the seeming randomness of the visible universe
• Communicative function: strong capacity for emotional mobilization. Myths “mobilize, energize, and even instigate large groups into action” (Tismaneanu 1998: 9) by appealing to the “infrarational segments of political behaviour” (15)
![Page 4: Myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (George Sorel 1990:19). Myth “functions as a timeless model”, which](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56649ee65503460f94bf605e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Numerous ways to categorize myths• According to the time-arrow direction• A) Foundational: past-oriented; focus on the
origins of the community; communicate a system of values and norms; e.g. Golden Ages
• B) Eschatological: future-oriented; propose a vision of the future, a way to escape the present morass and to found a new Golden Age; most commonly cause of political mobilization; action-oriented
![Page 5: Myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (George Sorel 1990:19). Myth “functions as a timeless model”, which](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56649ee65503460f94bf605e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• A) Salvationist: authoritarian. Need of a strong leader able to save the situation and lift the country out of its current dire straits
• B) Messianic: nationalist. nation as having a special mission, endowed with particular characteristics that place it above other nations and thus a privileged leader
• C) Vengeful. Guilt and responsibility outside the group; compensation needed for past suffering in the name of moral superiority
• D) Reactionary. Conservative, anti-revolutionary. Refuse change, prefer to return to an idealized past.
![Page 6: Myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (George Sorel 1990:19). Myth “functions as a timeless model”, which](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56649ee65503460f94bf605e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Archetypes: the Conspiracy, the Saviour, the Golden Age and the Unity (Girardet, 1986).
• Myths of territory: “the cradle of civilization”, “promised land”. Primacy of arrival and inhabitation - legitimacy to claims over land
• Myth of kinship and shared descent: the modern nation, as an extended family
• Myths of redemption and suffering: bright future guaranteed by the expiation of sins
![Page 7: Myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (George Sorel 1990:19). Myth “functions as a timeless model”, which](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56649ee65503460f94bf605e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Myths of unjust treatment: conspiracy, fatalism; responsibility given to objective and inescapable forces like the laws of history or assigning blame to other, enemy, groups
• Myths of election: group is endowed by nature or by divine right with special qualities
• Myths of military valor: male values of courage, honor and generosity are promoted to national value status
• Myths of rebirth and renewal: a dark period of decline is to be followed by a new cycle of prosperity and glory for the community
![Page 8: Myth as “a vision of the future which makes crude but practical sense of the present” (George Sorel 1990:19). Myth “functions as a timeless model”, which](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071808/56649ee65503460f94bf605e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Myth of divine election – a community’s collective belief in its nomination by the deity for a special destiny
• Strong Biblical tradition, but not only (see Arabs)• Types: missionary and covenantal; • 4 strategies of ethnic survival: imperial-dynastic,
communal-demotic, emigrant colonist, and diaspora-restoration
• Case of the USA: e.g. Reagan, Bush• “Chosenness is the supreme guarantor of ethnic
durability” – true or false?• Which impact on nationalism?