n o i t i s o p time (ms) · 2002. 11. 12. · rm 0.65 0.92 0.85 0.9 1.2 window width (minarc) s...
TRANSCRIPT
Fig. 1 (1 column) Kagan et al.
forward
backward
OI 0.75
OI 0.84
C
0
100
200
300Sp
ikes
/sPo
sitio
n 100
0
*6000 100 300
Time (ms)
Stimulus, vel 5.5 deg/s
400
0 300 600100 400 500200
Time (ms)forward backward
A
B
0 33.3 100
95%
INCw
sepDECw
1000*
66.6
Position (minarc)
0 100
1000*
D
Position (minarc)
Fig. 2 (1 column) Kagan et al.
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
10
20
30
40
50
60
Overlap Index
Num
ber o
f cel
ls
OI distribution (n=211)
simple (n=33)
complex (n=178)
Spik
es/s
100
200
14 28 700
100
200 simple cellOI=0.28
B
14 28 700
150
300
300
150
complex cellOI=0.61
C
Position (minarc)
14 28 700
150
300
300
150
complex cellOI=0.96
D
14 28 700
200
400
400
200
simple cellOI=-0.25
A
E
Fig. 3 (1 column) Kagan et al.
0 20 40 60 800
20
40
60
80
AR width low vel (minarc)
AR w
idth
hig
h ve
l (m
inar
c)
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
OI before ∆L correction
OI a
fter ∆
L co
rrect
ion
A
B
Fig. 4 (2 columns) Kagan et al.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
10
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
10
20
30
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
10
20
CRF width (minarc)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
10
20
2/3complex simple monocontrast
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
10
20
30
4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
10
20
AR width (minarc)
5/6
Num
ber o
f cel
ls
Fig. 5 (2 columns) Kagan et al.
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000-50
0
50
Trial #7
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000-50
0
50
Trial #8
0 50 100 150 2000
50
100
150
Spik
es/s
ec
90
270
180 0
0 5 10 15 200
30
60
0 50 100 150 2000
50
100
150
Spik
es/s
ec
90
270
180 0
0 5 10 15 200
30
60
Hz0 5 10 15 20
0
30
60
Eye
posi
tion
(min
arc)
Time (ms)VerticalHorizontal
One temporal cycle200 ms (TF 5 Hz)
Phases of first harmonic(F1) for each individual segment (deg)
ALL NO SACCADES ALIGNED
RM 0.94 RM 1.33RM 1.15
A
B
C
D
(a) (b)
(e)(d) (g)
(c)
(f)
Fig. 6 (1 column) Kagan et al.
0 0.5 1 1.5 25
0
5
10
15All
complex
simple
0 0.5 1 1.5 25
0
5
10
15No saccades
0 0.5 1 1.5 25
0
5
10
15Aligned
Relative modulation
Num
ber o
f cel
ls
Fig. 7 (2 columns) Kagan et al.
0 200 4000
100
200
0 5 10 15 200
50
100
0 500 10000
100
200
0 2 4 6 8 100
50
100
0 200 4000
200
400
0 5 10 15 200
50
100
150
0 500 10000
100
200
300
0 2 4 6 8 100
20
40
60
0 200 4000
50
100
150
0 5 10 15 200
20
40
60
0 500 10000
100
200
0 2 4 6 8 100
20
40
0 200 4000
50
100
150
0 5 10 15 200
20
40
Hz0 500 1000
0
50
100
150
0 2 4 6 8 100
10
20
30
HzTime (ms) Time (ms)
Spik
es/s
drifting (TF 5 Hz) counterphase (TF 2 Hz)
simpleOI -0.25
complexOI 0.90
complexOI 0.84
complexOI 0.82
A
B
C
D
RM 1.62
RM 0.25
RM 0.54
RM 1.21
Fig. 8 (1.5 columns) Kagan et al.
0 0.5 1 1.5 25
0
5
10
15
No saccades
Max
imal
har
mon
ic A
0 0.5 1 1.5 25
0
5
10
15
Aligned
B
0 0.5 1 1.5 25
0
5
10
15
Max
imal
RM
C
0 0.5 1 1.5 25
0
5
10
15D
Relative modulation
Num
ber o
f cel
ls
Fig. 9 (1.5 columns) Kagan et al.
-0.5 0 0.5 10
1
2
3
No saccades
Max
imal
har
mon
ic A
-0.5 0 0.5 10
1
2
3
Aligned
B
-0.5 0 0.5 10
1
2
3
Max
imal
RM
C
-0.5 0 0.5 10
1
2
3D
Overlap Index
Rel
ativ
e m
odul
atio
n
Fig. 10 (1 columns) Kagan et al.
0 1 2 3 4 50
10
20
30
40
50Maximal harmonicA
0 1 2 3 4 50
10
20
30
40
50Maximal RM
Spatial frequency (cpd)
Num
ber o
f cel
ls
Maximal harmonicB
0 0.5 1 1.5 20
10
20
30
0 0.5 1 1.5 20
10
20
30Maximal RM
Complexity Index
Num
ber o
f cel
ls
CRF 30'
window 52'C
Fig. 11 (1 column) Kagan et al.
A
0.3 0.5 1 20
25
50
0.36 0.47 0.48 0.86RM
Spatial frequency (cpd)
Increasing SF, constant window (23 minarc)
F0F1F2
26 44 83 116 1620
25
500.65 0.92 0.85 0.9 1.2RM
Window width (minarc)
Increasing window, constant SF (0.5 cpd)Spik
es/s
B
Spik
es/s
HzTime (ms)
SF 3 cpd
SF 1 cpd
SF 0.5 cpd
RM 1.10, F2/F1 0.45
RM 0.52, F2/F1 1.35
RM 0.32, F2/F1 1.50
0 200 4000
50
100
150
0 5 10 15 200
20
40
60
0 200 4000
50
100
150
0 5 10 15 200
20
40
60
0 200 4000
50
100
150
0 5 10 15 200
20
40
60