n.34 michel great-influence-of paolo-farinella-in-studies-of
DESCRIPTION
Talk of the "International Workshop on Paolo Farinella (1953-2000): the Scientists, the man", Pisa, 14-16 June 2010TRANSCRIPT
Pisa, 06/16/2010
Great influence of Paolo Farinella in studies of dynamics of Near-Earth asteroids and
collisional processes
Vth Catastrophic Disruption Workshop, Oregon, 1998
• Amors: a>1 AU 1.017<q<1.3 AU
• Apollos: a>1 AU q<1.017 AU
• Atens: a<1 AU Q>0.987 AU
• IEOs: a<1 AU Q<0.987
1000 Objects with D>1 km
Years of studies have shown that asteroids from different regions of the Main Belt (MB) are injected into resonances which transport them on Earth-crossing orbits
But once NEOs, what are the main dynamical mechanisms at work? Are there only planetary approaches, as
commonly assumed at that time?
• Eros: target of NEAR (NASA/APL)
• Nereus: initial target of Muses-C (Hayabusa,JAXA)
Hayabusa cambe back on June 13th, one day before Paolo’s meeting: Re-entry capsule in the Woomera desert (Australia)
Semimajor axis close to 1 AU or 0.72 AU Low inclination < 20° ω librates around 0° or 180°
From Michel&Thomas 1996, AA 307
ν13 and ν14 cause great inclination changes
Nature, Vol. 380, 25 April 1996
ν16
ν4
Distance To Earth
Collision
Longitude of perihelions Longitude of nodes Michel&Froechlé, 1997, Icarus 128
Proper i, versus proper a, for e=0.1
Polar diagrams eccentricity, ν3 Overlapping of ν13 and ν14 = source of chaos
Inclination, ν13
Michel, 1997, Icarus 129
« It makes Boom »!
Prof. A. Fujiwara: leader of the Science Team of the mission Hayabusa, Pioneer of impact experiments, and good colleague of Paolo!
Setoh, Nakamura, Michel et al. 2010, Icarus 205
Experiments using the two-stage light gas gun of ISAS in Japan
Comparison with impact experiments on basalt
Nakamura & Fujiwara 93
dust removed
largest fragment as a function of impact angle
→ SPH simulations using 3.5×106 particles
Benz & Asphaug 1994!High-res. Runs by M. Jutzi!
Example: a projectile hits a 100 km-size body at 5 km/s (average impact velocity in the MB)
From Jutzi, Michel, Benz, Richardson 2010.
Red zones are damaged
Gravitational phase: once fragments have been generated they reaccumulate due to their mutual attractions
Snapshots centered on the largest fragment; time t=0 to 84 minutes Increase of realism of simulations: model of rigid body allows Reproducingthe shapes of aggregates formed during a collision (Richardson, Michel et al. 2009, PSS 57):
Michel P. et al. 2001. 2002, 2003, 2004 Michel P. 2006, Lecture Notes Physics Michel P. 2009, Lecture Notes in Physics
Itokawa
Forming asteroid families: Testing the gravity regime
P. Michel, W. Benz, P. Tanga and D. Richardson, 2001
2) expanding debris are re-accumulating to form family members
1) the parent body is totally disrupted by a catastrophic impact
→ SPH simulations of impact
time
→ N-body simulations of re-accumulation
Size distribution of an asteroid family: actual and simulated members
Michel et al., Science 294 (2001)
Michel et al., Nature 421 (2003)
Our simulations of asteroid disruptions reproduced for the first time asteroid families and suggest that objects > km are gravitational agregates (rubble piles)
Impact energies and disruption outcomes greatly depend on the initial internal structure of the impacted body
Internal structure of small bodies: Characterisation and role
Impact speed: 3 km/s
Jutzi, Michel, Hiraoka, Nakamura, Benz, 2009, Icarus 201
Différent kinds of porosity
Winter 2010 with A. Nakamura, a good colleague of Paolo
T = 1.5 ms!Experiment! Simulation!
Jutzi, Michel, Hiraoka, Nakamura, Benz, 2009, Icarus 201
First validations of a model of fragmentation of porous body
T = 8 ms!Experiment! Simulation!
First application at large scale: formation of the crater on the asteroid Stein (Rosetta image)
Jutzi, Michel, Benz 2010. A&A 509, L2
Asphaug et al. 2003
Impact energy threshold for disruption of a solid target vs. Target’s radius
This parameter still needs to be better estimated for monolithic targets, and was not estimated for rubble piles and porous bodies
Threshold for "which the "largest "fragment has "50% of the "mass of the "original body"
(thick line with dots:"Benz & Asphaug "1999)"
Impact angle: 45° Impact velocity: 3 km/s
Q*D=Q0(R/1cm)a + B ρ(R/1cm)b
Impact angle: 45°
Q*D=Q0(R/1cm)a + B ρ(R/1cm)b
Impact angle: 45°
Jutzi, Michel, Benz, Richardson 2010, Icarus, in press.
Jutzi, Michel, Benz, Richardson 2010, Icarus, in press
Slope Independent On target’s diameter
Particles initially at the surface in orange, those initially inside in blank (the pole of the primary should be less weathered than that at the equator)
1999 KW4 (Radar Image Ostro et al.)
Walsh K., Richardson D.C., Michel, P., Nature 454
Spin-up due to YORP, a variant of the re-discovered Yarkowsky effect by Paolo
Final Snapshot of a simulation of spin-up of a km-size aggregate resulting in a binary with similar properties as observed ones
Thank you!!
Porous versus non-porous!!
And thank you, Paolo, for accompanying my researches every day!!