naep-howard statistics and evaluation institute this workshop still available: qualitative research...

29
NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute This Workshop Still Available: Qualitative Research Methods August 11-22 10am-2pm School of Education Bld. Room 216 Attendees will learn to apply various methods of qualitative inquiry, including ethnographic, structured and semi-structured interviewing, focus groups, document and content analysis, narrative inquiry, phenomenological studies, case study, observation, historical research, and action research. Instructor: Dr. Dawn Williams, Chair of Department of Educational Administration and Policy. You must apply separately for this workshop. NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Upload: ximena-swails

Post on 13-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

This Workshop Still Available:

Qualitative Research Methods August 11-22 10am-2pmSchool of Education Bld. Room 216 Attendees will learn to apply various methods of qualitative inquiry, including ethnographic, structured and semi-structured interviewing, focus groups, document and content analysis, narrative inquiry, phenomenological studies, case study, observation, historical research, and action research.

Instructor: Dr. Dawn Williams, Chair of Department of Educational Administration and Policy.

You must apply separately for this workshop.

More information is available at www.HowardSEI.org.

NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Quantitative Methodsfor the Social and Behavioral Sciences

Dr. Jamie BardenDepartment of [email protected]

NAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation InstituteNAEP-Howard Statistics and Evaluation Institute

Social and Behavioral Sciences

:study systematic processes of human behavior.

Level of Analysiswithin individual: neuroscience, brain biology individual: psychology, behavioral genetics social structure: economics, anthropology,

sociology, political science, public health

“People like it when they understand something that they previously thought they couldn't understand. It's a sense of empowerment.”

--Neil DeGrasse Tyson, 2008

“What is the principal of science?

The test of all knowledge is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific 'truth'.”

“What business are you in as a scientist?

There is an expanding frontier of ignorance...”

-- Richard Feynman (1964)

Why use the scientific method?

To understand relationships between variables in our social world.

Empirically test predictions. (birds of a feather/opposites attract)

To allow others to independently verify findings.

Hypothesis

Operationalize

Measure

Evaluate

Revise or Replicate

Hypothesis: an explicit, testable prediction about the

conditions under which an event will occur.

Useful hypotheses should be 1. a priori: before data collection2. falsifiable: could be found false

Hypothesis

Where do hypotheses come from?

Segue to Inspiration

Has your hypothesis been explored already?

Segue to Literature Review

Operationalize

Conceptual variable: The general abstract definition of a variable. (like a dictionary definition)

Operational definition: The specific procedures for manipulating or measuring a conceptual variable. (concrete application)

Hypothesis (conceptual)

similar people will be more attracted to each other

Hypothesis (operational)

personality test choice of interaction partnerheight, age attraction questionnaire

Construct Validity: How well measures and manipulations reflect the variables they are intended to measure and manipulate.

1. distancing behavior

2. questionnaire items

3. facial expression

4. skin conductance

Example

Fear

Operational (concrete measures and manipulations)

Conceptual (dictionary)

Variables

Pick One of Your Variables

Feeling scared or a behavioral tendency to distance the self from a stimuli

Methodological Options: Social and Behavioral Sciences

Data Collection Approaches1. Life Record Data2. Field Study3. Survey Research4. Laboratory Research5. Case Study6. Focus Group7. Modeling

Types of StudyA. DescriptiveB. CorrelationalC. Experimental

Which have you used?

MeasureThree types of studies:

1. Descriptive: What is the level of 1 variable?

Ex: What is the president’s overall approval rating?

2. Correlational: How are 2 variables related?

Ex: How does survey respondent’s age relate to approval rating? [Predictor is measured]

3. Experimental: Does one variable cause the other?

Ex: Does dark vs. light skin in Barack Obama’s photos influence approval rating?

[The independent variable is manipulated]

Measure: Descriptive Descriptive Research: describes people using

the level of a single variable (a thought, feeling or behavior).

Types:1. Observation2. Historical records (archives)3. Survey questionnaires

Examples?

Descriptive Research Example

Gallup Daily Poll

Population Sample

Measure: Descriptive Random Sampling: Selecting participants to be in

a study so that everyone in the population has an equal chance of being in the study.

A random sample (N=1000) allows us to generalize our findings back to THIS population.

Estimate of Population (mean +/- %)

Measure: Descriptive

Advantage: easy to do

Disadvantage: only involves 1 variable, so no information about relationships between variables.

Correlational Research: describes the relationship between two or more naturally occurring variables (predictor and criterion).

-Does having a resilient personality relate to mental health outcomes following natural disaster?

-Does pre-existing STD infection increase susceptibility to HIV infection?

-When the sun is out more, are people happier?

Which is the predictor variable? In correlational research the predictor is measured not manipulated.

Measure: Correlational

Advantage: study naturally occurring variables

Disadvantage: correlation is not causation

You cannot draw causal conclusions from correlational results.

Measure: Experimental Experimental Research: examines cause and

effect relationships between variables.

Independent Variable (IV) Variable that is the CAUSE of the dependent variable Variable that is manipulated by the experimenter

Dependent Variable (DV) Variable that is the EFFECT Variable that is measured

NOTE: The IV is manipulated, which helps make it independent of other variables.

Measure: Experimental

Examples (name the IV & DV): -Are children more likely to be aggressive after being shown violent media content to children (or is there no effect)?

-What impact does having a Black person (or not) in an otherwise White group have on decision making?

-Is someone more likely to be attracted to you if you emphasize your similarities or differences?

-How does alcohol consumption (or not) relate to male decision-making regarding sexual encounters?

Measure: Experimental

Advantage: cause/effect relationships

Disadvantage: can’t manipulate all variables (impossible or ethical reasons).

Demos

Name that method DEMO Name that method for your research.

The End

Measure: Experimental

random assignment—each participant in the experiment has to have an equal chance of being in any condition, so the conditions start the same. [DEMO]

25 participants needed per condition for a between-participants design.

½ are told about someone similar ½ told about someone different

Quasi-experiment

Lack of control over the assignment of participants to conditions and/or does not manipulate the causal variable of interest.

A quasi-independent variable is not a true independent variable that is manipulated by the researcher but rather is an event that occurred for other reasons.

Examples Does smoking cause cancer? Did 9/11 cause an increase in prejudice against

people of middle-eastern decent? Do Republican vs. Democratic presidents affect

the economy? Do extreme events (i.e., winning the lottery or

being paralyzed) affect day-to-day happiness? Does giving employees a raise or extra vacation

time boost productivity and job satisfaction? Does campus crime affect applicants to a

university?

Measure: Experimental

Advantage: can investigate quasi- independent variables that are impossible or unethical to manipulate

Disadvantage: internal validity threats undermine causal conclusions