naïve physics and mental models. reasoning about devices
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d8d5503460f94a75b10/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Naïve Physics and Mental Models
![Page 2: Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d8d5503460f94a75b10/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Reasoning about devices
![Page 3: Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d8d5503460f94a75b10/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Causal models– Vosniadou & Brewer– Contain causal
information– Go beyond what we
learn– May have flaws
Causal Models
![Page 4: Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d8d5503460f94a75b10/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Qualitative reasoning
• People generally do not reason about quantities
• Precise distances or specific relations among quanitities
• We reason qualitatively– If one quantity increases, another decreases– Boundary conditions
• Water flow occurs when the level in one container is larger than the level in the other.
![Page 5: Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d8d5503460f94a75b10/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Naïve physics• What would happen to a ball shot through
this pipe?
• People often respond by assuming curvilinear momentum– McCloskey and Proffitt
• Even happens if they carry out an action.
![Page 6: Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d8d5503460f94a75b10/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• What would happen to a bomb dropped from this plane?
![Page 7: Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d8d5503460f94a75b10/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Other areas of naïve physics
• Reasoning about collisions
• Piagetian Water Level Problem
• Reasoning about movement– Importance of embodiment in judging distances– Visual information is not enough– Vestibular information needed for rotation
![Page 8: Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d8d5503460f94a75b10/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Why do we err?• Our naïve physics matches our observations
– The world has friction, and so there are unseen forces that act in opposition to seen forces
– Our naïve physics is often accurate for things we can do with our bodies
• Only when we create larger machines do the differences become important.
• Should not be a surprise– Newtonian physics is only a few hundred years old– Aristotelian mechanics is closer to our daily
experience
![Page 9: Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d8d5503460f94a75b10/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)