nano coatings class

41
-Ashwin Vijaysai 1 Vijaysai anocoatings "Self-Cleaning Materials: Lotus Leaf-Inspired Nanotechnology“, August 2008, Scientific American.

Upload: ashwin-vijaysai

Post on 05-Apr-2015

355 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 1

-Ashwin VijaysaiNanocoatings

"Self-Cleaning Materials: Lotus Leaf-Inspired Nanotechnology“, August 2008, Scientific American.

Page 2: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 2

Is this familiar???

http://www.eye-doctor.ca/Content/eyeglasses/lenses/nikon/seecoat/seecoat.aspxhttp://www.pbma-fl.com/rain-repellent.html

Page 3: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 3

Overview• Significance of nano-coatings

• Why it is needed in MEMS– Anti- stiction (lube)– Improve lifetime

• Types of nano-coatings• Various chemistries

– Compare to choose the ideal– Observe aging of nano-coating

• Surface modification at TTU MEMS lab• Chloro-silane based SAM

– Hydrophobic coating- for MEMS

• {Alumina nanoparticle + Chloro-silane based SAM}– Superhydrophobic coating- for medical fabric

• Nano-coating characterization devices

Page 4: Nano Coatings Class

Surface Engineering

4Vijaysai

Significance of nanocoating

Increase life-time, re

liability and yield

Bett

er N

ano-

coati

ngs

performance

Page 5: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 5

Stiction based failure mechanisms• In MEMS is large• Stiction failure surface forces > spring forces• Common failure mechanisms due to stiction

are:– Capillary forces– Van der waals forces– Electrostatic forces

൬𝑺𝒖𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂𝑽𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒆 ൰

𝐸𝑖 = න 𝑐𝑖𝑧𝑛𝑖 ℎሺ𝑧ሻ𝑑𝑧∞0

* M. V. Spengen, “On the physics of stiction and its impact on the reliability of microstructures”, J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 563–582, 2003

Adhesion energy

ci = constant of force i depending on properties of surface and environmentn= power of interactionz = distance of separationh(z)=Distribution of distance between rough surfaces

Page 6: Nano Coatings Class

• Design modification – dimple, curve, FEM• Roughening surface – selective etch, skewness• Anti-Stiction Coatings –

– Plasma deposited coatings– Self-Assembled monolayers (SAM coatings)– Vapor phase deposited coatings– Getters

Solutions for alleviating stiction

S.No. Coating type Adhesion energy

1 OTS 30 µJ/m2

2 FDTS 8 µJ/m2

3 Untreated ~56 mJ/m2

Poly-Silicon MEMS

U. Srinivasan, M. R. Houston, R. T. Howe and R. Maboudian, J. MEMS, 7, 252-260, 1998.

~1000 times decrease of

energy!

Page 7: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 7

Significance of nanocoating• In SUMMiT-V after final release step, liquid in-

between two poly-silicon layers can cause failure.

» Solution: Critical point drying________» Future Problem: Capillary condensation

• Anti-stiction coating (hydrophobic) minimizes capillary condensation.

• Hydrophobic – fear of water» eg: teflon cookware

Page 8: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 8

Significance of nanocoatingHigh performance devices

TRA

HPCD

Under actuation gap reduces ~.05µm

Flexures

Page 9: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 9

Vapor Phase deposition of SAMFor MEMS devices under fabrication the last few steps impact the yield, reliability & functionality:• Release step

– Critical point drying– Avoid release stiction

• Surface preparation– Surface cleaning (organic contaminants)– Asher/ Ashing/ UV-O cleaner

• Exposure– Exposed to precursor (nano-coating chemistry)

Page 10: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 10

• Significance of nano-coatings• Why it is needed in MEMS

– Anti- stiction (lube)– Improve lifetime

In addition to: • Dimples, roughness, straps, guides, etc

associated with design• Process involved in SUMMiT-V fabrication is

not in our hands• Surface chemistry involved in the conformal

treatment to all poly-silicon layers helps» Lower adhesion energy» Increase reliability lifetime of device

Page 11: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 11

Common types of nanocoatings1. Chlorosilanes2. Amines3. Alcohols4. Carboxylic acids5. Siloxanes6. Dimethylaminosilanes

* R. Ashurst et. al, “Vapor Phase Anti-stiction coating for MEMS”, Trans. on device and materials reliability, vol.3, iss. 4, pp. 173-178, 2003.

Page 12: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 12

Page 13: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 13

Hydrolysis reaction1, some of the –OH groups participate in condensation reaction with –OH group on the oxidized surface of the silicon2, Cross polymerization occurs between the individual micelles

*Vapor-Phase Self-Assembled Monolayers for Anti-Stiction Applications in MEMS, Zhuang et al., J MEMS, 16, 6, 2007, pp. 1451-1460

*

Page 14: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 14

Page 15: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 15

Amines and Alcohols• -Cl terminated Silicon surface is obtatined by

exposing –H terminated Si sample to Cl2 in vacuum at 80℃ temerature of sample

• Amine is –NH2 eq (1)• Alcohol is –OH eq (2)

Page 16: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 16

SiloxanesAnalog devices – ADXL accelerometers

1. During packaging step2. Small aliquot dispensed inside package3. Package is sealed4. Temperature of the chip is raised5. Liquid evaporates and forms organic

monolayerExample: Demethyl siloxane

Page 17: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 17

Carboxylic acidsTexas Instruments – DMD chip

1. Perfluorinated –n- alkanoic acids (PFxA) ‘’ decnoic acid (PFDA)

• Minimize friction coefficient• Minimize thermal decomposition

Solid PFDA inside hermetic sealSublimation of PFDA due to its vapor pressureHealing one of its kind in MEMS package

350 billion cycles

Page 18: Nano Coatings Class

18

Dimethylaminosilanes• PF8TAS• PF10TAS

Vijaysai

Synthesized from:FOTSFDTS

•Similar procedure as in chlorosilanes•But no need for water vapor/ water in the reaction

Page 19: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 19

• Types of nano-coatings• Various chemistries

– Compare to choose the ideal– Observe aging of nano-coating

Page 20: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 20

At TTU – RPX 550, IST system

Page 21: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 21

Page 22: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 22

Page 23: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 23

Page 24: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 24

Page 25: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 25

Page 26: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 26

Reaction Chemistry• TMA (Alumina) Generation2Al(CH3)3 + 3H20 Al203 + 6CH4

• Linkerrix generation (Linking chemistry, that binds the TMA nano-particles)

SiCl4 + 2H20 Si02+ 4HCl

C2H4Cl6Si2 + 6H20 SiOx-(CH2)2-SiOx + 6HCl +3H20

C6H12Cl6Si2 + 6H20 SiOx-(CH2)2-SiOx + 6HCl +3H20

Page 27: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 27

Page 28: Nano Coatings Class

28

Nomenclature

Vijaysai

Page 29: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 29

Comparison of contact angle

Page 30: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 30

Comparison of Size

Page 31: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 31

Magnified images of superhydrophobic coating

SEM image of highly conformal coating

TEM image of alumina nano-particles.

Page 32: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 32

Page 33: Nano Coatings Class

RPX 550 System and initial results* www.insurftech.com

LDDMS VDDMS

FOTS

* R. Ashurst et. al, “Vapor Phase Anti-stiction coating for MEMS”, Trans. on device and materials reliability, vol.3, iss. 4, pp. 173-178, 2003.

Page 34: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 34

• Surface modification at TTU MEMS lab• Chloro-silane based SAM

– Hydrophobic coating- for MEMS

• {Alumina nanoparticle + Chloro-silane based SAM}– Superhydrophobic coating- for medical fabric

Page 35: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 35

Page 36: Nano Coatings Class

MEMS Tribogauge

Sense comb

Driving comb

Lateralaxis

Normalaxis

AD7747Eval

BoardLabView

MeasureDisplacement of

‘Head’, i.e,fingers (as ‘C’)Se

nse

com

b

Page 37: Nano Coatings Class

𝑭𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 > 𝑭𝒓𝒚 𝑭𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 = 𝑭𝒓𝒚− 𝑭𝒚↓ ∆𝑭𝒂𝒅𝒅. = 𝑭𝒚↑↑ 𝒄𝒐 − 𝑭𝒓𝒚 𝑭𝒚↑↑ 𝒄𝒐 = 𝑭𝒚↑

TRIBOGAUGE MODEL

37

‘δ’ D

isp

lace

men

t (µ

m)

D.C. Voltage (volts)0

3ApproachRetract

Maximum δ, C

Release Point

Maximum Displacement

Baseline Stiction Model‘C

’ Cap

acit

ance

(fF

)

𝑭𝒚↑ = 𝑭𝒓𝒚

𝑭𝒚↑ = ൬𝒏 𝜺 𝒕𝒈 ൰.𝑽𝟐

𝑭𝒓𝒚 = 𝒌𝒚.𝜹𝒚

,at contact of slider and scrubber𝑭𝒓𝒚 > 𝑭𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏

𝑭𝒚↓ = 𝑹𝒆𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒕 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒄 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒄𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝒅𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒃𝒔

∆𝑭𝒂𝒅𝒅. = 𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝒍𝒐𝒂𝒅 𝒃𝒆𝒚𝒐𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒄𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒍𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒖𝒃𝒃𝒆𝒓

𝑭𝒚↑↑𝒄𝒐 = 𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒎𝒖𝒎 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒄𝒆 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒔𝒍𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒄𝒕 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒖𝒃𝒃𝒆𝒓

𝑭𝒚↑ = 𝑨𝒑𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒂𝒄𝒉 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒄 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒄𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝒅𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒃𝒔

𝑭𝒓𝒚 = 𝑹𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒔𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒄𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒍 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒃𝒔

n : number of comb fingers = 160

ε: 8.854*10-12 F/m

t: 7*10-6 m

g: 0.5*10-6 m

V: approach voltage volts

Ky: Spring constant of sense and driving segments of normal axis

δy: Displacement of the slider, in µm

𝑭𝒚↓ = 𝑭𝒓𝒚

𝑭𝒚↓ = ൬𝒏 𝜺 𝒕𝒈 ൰.𝑽𝟐

𝑭𝒓𝒚 = 𝒌𝒚.𝜹𝒚

119

Adhesion Static Friction, Static friction coefficient

In-use stiction

Page 38: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 38

Nano-coating characterization devices/ techniques

Atomic Force Microscope:1. Topography2. Monolayer topography3. Force – Distance measurement4. Lateral force measurement

Page 39: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 39

Backup

Page 40: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 40

Static friction is friction between two solid objects that are not moving relative to each other. For example, static friction can prevent an object from sliding down a sloped surface. The coefficient of static friction, typically denoted as μs, is usually

higher than the coefficient of kinetic friction.The static friction force must be overcome by an applied force before an object can move. The maximum possible friction force between two surfaces before sliding

begins is the product of the coefficient of static friction and the normal force: .

Kinetic (or dynamic) friction occurs when two objects are moving relative to each other and rub together (like a sled on the ground). The coefficient of kinetic friction is typically denoted as μk, and is usually less than the coefficient of static friction for the same materials

wikipedia

Types of frictionWith respect to motion

Page 41: Nano Coatings Class

Vijaysai 41

A1) Super-hydrophobicity is a combination of roughness, coverage (aerial density) and surface energy. So alumina nano-particles are very important for roughness and how you distribute the nano-particles over the surface. But you need to combine this with low surface energy of the Phobix. A2) The boulder formation that IST reports was observed when using amine – epoxy adhesion versus a linkerrix (oxide) adhesion. In the ATETATETA is (A=amine step / T=TMA aluminum oxide / E=Epoxy) a sequence. The durability was improved with Amine-T-Epoxy reaction schemes. However, IST’s highest durability was observed with a ALD layer.