nanotechnology workshop - standards australia · agenda nanotechnology workshop welcome– mr...
TRANSCRIPT
NANOTECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP
4 July 2012
WELCOME
Adrian O’Connell
General Manager
Standards Australia
4 July 2012
INTRODUCTIONS AND FORUM OBJECTIVES
Damian Fisher
Senior National Sector Manager
Operations – Health & ICT
Agenda
Nanotechnology
Workshop
Welcome– Mr Adrian O’Connell, General
Manager, Operations - Standards Australia
Introductions and workshop objectives
Speaker 1- Mr Damian Fisher (SA) – Standards
development processes & use of international
standards in Australia
Speaker 2- Mr Howard Morris (Chair of NT-001)
– Background to NT-001 & ISO Nanotechnologies
Technical Committee TC 229
Facilitator – Dr John Miles – Development and
application of Nanotechnologies – including
consideration of international definitions
Agenda
Nanotechnologies
Workshop
Consumer Perspective - Ms Elaine Attwood
(Consumer Federation of Australia) and Ms
Georgia Miller (Friends of the Earth Australia)
Industry Perspective, Mr Ken King (Micronisers)
Unions Perspective, Ms Renata Musolino
(Victorian Trade Hall Council)
Regulator’s Perspective, Ms Kerry Nugent
(NICNAS)
Scientific Communities Perspective, Associate
Professor Paul Wright (RMIT University)
Metrology Perspective, Dr Jan Hermann (National
Measurement Institute)
Agenda
continued
Workshop – Breakout Groups
Open forum discussion
Feedback from Breakout Group Leaders
Panel discussion
Summary, Next steps and close
Principal
objectives of
today’s
workshop
meeting…
Up-date stakeholders on the important standards
development work that is happening
internationally in ISO/TC 229 - Nanotechnologies
Seek feedback from stakeholders on key ISO
nanotechnology definitions and nomenclature
projects
Explore current issues and identify needs of
stakeholders that could be addressed by adopting
new International Standards or developing
Australian Standards
Answer the key question of how you can get
involved?
Agree on the need for and structure of future
Nanotechnology workshops that can help inform
the work of Standards Australia and our technical
committees
Stakeholder
Engagement is
Critical to
Success
Sector and Issue Forums are key to Standards
Development
In 2011 SA organised 20 forums with
450+ participants
Aligning SA with emerging issues and market
needs
Facilitating strategic engagement
Engaging new stakeholders
De-risking new projects
THANK YOU
An Introduction to Standards Australia and the Standards Development Process
Mr Damian Fisher
Senior National Sector Manager,
Operations – Health & ICT
Nanotechnologies Workshop
4 July 2012
A Not-For-Profit Company – Membership based; Government, Industry & Community
Standards
Australia
Recognised as Australia’s National Standards Body by the Australian Government
Australia’s
National
Standards Body
Member of ISO
and IEC
Multi-discipline and cross-sector, including
conformity assessment
Electro-technology, including medical
devices
Our Key
Activities
Standards Development
Accreditation of SDO Organisations
Design Assessment & Promotion
National and International Standards Co-ordination
One of the world’s leading
standards organisations
Standards Development – developing
internationally harmonised Australian Standards
and other normative technical documents through
expert Technical Committees.
National and International Standards
Information and Co-ordination – coordinating
representation of Australian input into international
standards development and adoption, promoting
information exchange and knowledge
management.
Accrediting Standards Development
Organisations (SDOs) – through the Accreditation
Board for Standards Development Organisations
(ABSDO).
Design Assessment and Promotion – Principal
Sponsor of the Australian International Design
Awards. More than 50 years experience of
benchmarking excellence in fostering design and
innovation.
One of the world’s leading
standards organisations
Standards Development – developing
internationally harmonised Australian Standards
and other normative technical documents through
expert Technical Committees.
National and International Standards
Information and Co-ordination – coordinating
representation of Australian input into international
standards development and adoption, promoting
information exchange and knowledge
management.
Accrediting Standards Development
Organisations (SDOs) – through the Accreditation
Board for Standards Development Organisations
(ABSDO).
Design Assessment and Promotion – Principal
Sponsor of the Australian International Design
Awards. More than 50 years experience of
benchmarking excellence in fostering design and
innovation.
International standards development
Recognised as a major contributor to ISO / IEC & regional bodies
A leading standards body in the Asia Pacific region
The International Organization for Standardization
(ISO) is the world's largest developer and
publisher of International Standards
ISO, which is based in Geneva, was founded in
1946 by delegates from 25 countries and started
operations in 1947
ISO is now a network of the national standards
bodies of 163 countries, (one member per
country)
Between 1947 and the present day, ISO has
published more than 18,000 International
Standards, ranging from standards for activities
from agriculture and construction, through to
mechanical engineering and medical devices, to
the newest information technology developments
www.iso.org
ISO’s structure
Notes Notes
Members from 163
countries, covering
98% of world GNI
and 97% of world
population
Over 18,000
international
standards based on
consensus
195 active technical
committees with
3,238 technical
groups, 50,000
experts
Central Secretariat
in Geneva with 153
FTE staff
Members from 163
countries, covering
98% of world GNI
and 97% of world
population
Over 18,000
international
standards based on
consensus
195 active technical
committees with
3,238 technical
groups, 50,000
experts
Central Secretariat
in Geneva with 153
FTE staff
The ISO
committee
structure
• The technical work is carried out under the
overall management of the Technical
Management Board (TMB)
• It is responsible for setting up the various
technical committees, appointing a TC
Chairperson and monitoring the progress of the
technical work
• It is also responsible for the Directives, which
are essentially the rules for the development of
International Standards
The ISO
committee
structure
Technical Committees (TC) are established by the
Technical Management Board to serve specific
industries or generic subjects, in order to develop
International Standards or other ISO publications
appropriate to the needs of that sector
Subcommittees (SC) to focus on specific parts of
the overall standards requirement
Working Groups (WG) to focus on specific tasks
within the overall programme
Technical Barriers
to Trade
Background
The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade
(also known as the TBT Agreement) is an
international treaty of the World Trade
Organization
The policy of Standards Australia is to base
Australian Standards on International Standards
to the maximum extent feasible
Standards Australia have accepted the Code of
Good Practice For The Preparation, Adoption And
Application Of Standards set out in Annex 3 WTO
TBT Agreement
Levels of
participation in
International
standardisation
All national bodies have the right to participate in
the work of technical committees and
subcommittees
Standards Australia is the official Australian
representative to ISO/TC 229 - Nanotechnologies
In order to achieve maximum efficiency and the
necessary discipline in the work, each national
body is required to clearly indicate whether it
intends to participate (P) or act as an observer (O)
To participate actively in the work, with an
obligation to vote on all questions formally
submitted for voting within the technical
committee or subcommittee, on new work item
proposals, enquiry drafts and final draft
International Standards, and to contribute to
meetings (P-members)
Levels of
participation
To follow the work as an observer, and therefore
to receive committee documents and to have the
right to submit comments and to attend meetings
(O-members)
A national body may choose to be either a P-
member or an O-member of a given committee or
subcommittee
All national bodies irrespective of their status
within a technical committee or subcommittee,
have the right to submit comments and vote on
enquiry drafts and on final draft International
Standards
National bodies have the responsibility to
organise their national input in an efficient and
timely manner, taking account of all relevant
interests at their national level
Request for a
new project Preliminary Draft Development and
Acceptance of
Committee Draft
Draft International
Standard (DIS)
Consideration of
Voting (66%)
Final Draft
International
Standard (FDIS) Publication of ISO
International
Standard
Working Group or Subcommittee
Proposal Stage
Committee Stage
Send to Central Secretariat
Send to Central Secretariat
Circulated to Member Bodies for voting
HOW A STANDARD IS DEVELOPED
Preparatory stage
Enquiry Stage
Approval Stage
Publication Stage
Consideration of
Voting (66%)
ISO Project
Stages
Preliminary stage Preliminary work item (project) PWI
Proposal stage New proposal for a work item NP
Preparatory stage Working draft WD
Committee stage Committee draft CD
Enquiry stage Draft International Standards DIS
Approval Stage Final Draft International standards FDIS
Publication Stage International Standards IS
• ISO’s deliverables are developed through a
sequence of project stages
• Each stage has its name, but very often the
stages are identified by using the acronyms that
are associated with each stage
Copyright © 2010 Standards Australia Limited
ISO Project
Tracks
Service
Offering to
Support
Australian
Mirror
Committees
Receive committee documents (such as ballots,
comments, agendas, reports, etc.) from ISO or IEC
Secretariat and distribute them to Australian mirror
group as appropriate
Distribute draft documents to the Australian mirror
group within adequate timeframes to allow for
consideration and formation of an Australian
position
Facilitate the endorsement of AU delegates by the
mirror group to attend ISO/TC 229 meetings
overseas
Collate ballots and comments on various draft
stages including working drafts, committee drafts,
DIS (CDV) or FDIS documents from ISO or IEC
committees and send to ISO/IEC TC or SC
Secretariat
Service Offering
to Support
Australian Mirror
Committees
Facilitate an Australian position (yes/no/abstain)
on systematic reviews, new work item proposals,
CD, DIS or FDIS documents requiring a vote
Administrate the vote from the national member
body (SA) into the international arena in the
manner required according to the international
directives
National Sector Managers provide consultation on
new fields of work (TC/SC), new work item
proposals for ISO or IEC and activities undertaken
in support of existing Australian mirror groups
including NT-001 Nanotechnologies
International
Standards -
Australian Mirror
Committees
Key principles:
Member organisations have a broad national base of
constituents;
Transparent process;
Consensus & Balance of interests
Typical sectors of interest may include:
Consumer/community groups;
Employer bodies;
Government: Federal, state and local;
Industry, professional and technical bodies;
Manufacturers/suppliers;
Regulatory and controlling bodies;
Researchers, academics and testing organisations;
Unions/employees; and
User and purchasing bodies.
Benefits
Realisation for
Active
Participation
Strategic engagement with NT-001 gives stakeholders with an interest in Nanotechnologies early access to information that could shape the market in the future
Gives your organisation a key voice and role in the development of standards
Helps contribute to keep market access open and ensures a focus on providing consensus based solutions to address health, safety and environmental concerns
Fosters communication and collaboration in R&D and business.
Getting involved in international standards
development brings Australia’s concerns and needs to bear on a process that will affect you now and in the future…
THANK YOU
Leveraging the use of International Nanotechnology Standards in Australia
Mr Damian Fisher
Senior National Sector Manager
Operations – Health & ICT
4 July 2012
Standards
Development
Objective
– To excel in the provision of contemporary,
internationally aligned standards and related
services for the benefit of Australia
Related services
– Forums; Seminars; Scoping Studies; International
services and Training
Speed to Market
Quality
Value
Strategic Engagement
Time and Costs
Principles of
Standardisation Neutrality and Independence Neutrality and Independence
Consensus Consensus
Balanced Representation Balanced Representation
Consultation Consultation
Transparency Transparency
International Alignment International Alignment
National Compatibility National Compatibility
TR
US
T A
ND
AU
TH
OR
ITY
All project proposals assessed and approved by the Board
-Standards Development Sub-Committee
Approved projects commence with kick off meeting &
project management plan
Standards
Development
Process
Committee
Review
Public
Comment
Committee
BallotPublication
Working
Draft
Should take no more than 24 months. Goal is 12 months or less.
Timeframes also pathway related
Stakeholders have pathway options
– Standards Australia Resourced
– Committee Driven
– Externally Funded
Difference between pathways is resource contribution and
responsibility allocation
Driver is control over work priorities and timeframes
Standards
Development
Pathways
Purpose
– Fair, equitable and sustainable allocation of SA’s
standards development resources
Criteria and Process
– Net benefit
– Stakeholder support
Two Rounds per year
– May and November
Prioritisation
Process for
Standards
Australia
Resourced
Pathway
Challenges 1. There are finite Standards Australia and stakeholder
resources
2. The increasing demand for standardisation particularly
in nanotechnologies
3. The need to maximise the effectiveness of the limited
resources for optimal benefit
4. How to equitably allocate available SA resources
across multiple sectors and industries…
Benefits 1. Clarity
– Volume of work
– Scope of individual projects
– Intended outcome and benefits
2. Scheduled timeframes for submission and assessment
of proposals
3. Equitable and transparent criteria and prioritisation
process
4. Expectations are managed for all project participants
Proposal Forms
1. New or revised Australian Standard and lower
consensus documents
2. AS or joint AS/NZS Australian identical adoption of
published International Standard (ISO, IEC, ISO/IEC)
3. Australian participation in International Standardisation
committees (ISO, IEC, ISO/IEC)
Proposals to develop or revise a standard or engage in
international standardisation activity are made via a
Project Proposal Form
» www.standards.org.au
All proposals need to demonstrate Net Benefit,
stakeholder support and to avoid duplication of
international standards
Net Benefit case answers the question - will the
Standard have an overall positive impact on relevant
communities?
Project Proposal
and Net Benefit
Assessment
1. NSMs review proposals in their sectors for:
– Quality and completeness of proposal
– Evidence of Stakeholder consultation and support
– Prima facie Net Benefit
2. Assessors review in-depth all proposals received, and
identify:
– Net Benefit
– Legislative reference (primary and secondary)
– International alignment
Methodology introduced in 2008
Net Benefit takes into account the costs and benefits
related to the following criteria:
– Public health and safety;
– Social and community impact;
– Environmental impact;
– Competition; and
– Economic impact.
These measures align with Australian Government Office
of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) and provide a level
playing field for all proposals for Standards development
projects.
Net Benefit Test
Dedicated National Sector Managers work across 12 sectors; including the health sector…
– Aligning Standards Australia with emerging needs and issues
Refrigeration of vaccines
A new AS in colour coding and positioning of disinfection solutions in sinks in relation to health care settings
Sunscreens: 50+ SPF
Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sterile acupuncture needles for single use
Health Informatics /PCEHR, and much more
– Facilitating strategic engagement
– Nanotechnology website, forums & NWIP
– Engaging new stakeholders
Stakeholder
Engagement is
Critical
Engaging
Internationally is a
Strategic
Imperative…
Involvement in International Standards setting is a
strategic asset for Australia
It serves the national interest
Participating internationally gives Australia the
opportunity to define and shape international
standards development solutions and outcomes
It is a key enabler for driving positive change based
on shared solutions underpinned by consensus,
transparency and balanced interests
Increasing use of standards helps to protect
communities against safety, health and environmental
issues
Participating internationally opens up markets and
reduces barriers to trade
THANK YOU