napa countywide transportation plan · •background data/issue paper spring 2014 •call for...
TRANSCRIPT
Napa Countywide Transportation Plan Public workshops | April, 2014 | American Canyon, St. Helena, Napa
Why a Countywide Plan?
1. Identify investments to best serve Napa communities
2. Plan for a multi-modal system
3. Leverage potential revenue sources with existing funding
4. Put Measure T expenditure plan in context of other potential sources
5. Inform Napa’s contribution to the RTP
2 of 35
Countywide planning process
• Begin with previous plans
• Types of projects addressed
• Prioritization criteria
3 of 35
Countywide planning process
• Project kick-off and initiate outreach Winter 2014
• Background data/issue paper Spring 2014
• Call for projects/programs Summer/Fall 2014
• Review of Projects/Programs Fall/Winter 2014
• Draft Plan Spring 2015
• Final Plan May 2015
• Project Submittals due to MTC ~ June 2015
4 of 35
Planning process | Public input
• Community workshops
• Comment cards available today
• Web: www.nctpa.net/vision-2040-project-overview
• Survey: www.surveymonkey.com/s/vision-2040
• Mapping tool: www.collaborativemap.org/NapaCounty
• Quarterly Board meetings
5 of 35
Goals of the Countywide Plan
Serve the transportation needs of the entire community regardless of age, income or physical ability.
Improve system safety in order to support all modes and serve all users.
Use taxpayer dollars efficiently.
Support Napa County’s economic vitality.
Minimize the energy and other resources required to move people and goods.
Prioritize the maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing system.
6 of 35
Goal 1
Serve the transportation needs of the entire community regardless of age, income or physical ability.
7 of 35
Goal 1 | Projected age distribution
Source: California Department of Finance Note: Plan Bay Area projects total 2040 population of 163,000
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
2010 2020 2030 2040
Popu
latio
n
Total pop
25‒64
0‒24 65+
Seniors are the fastest-growing demographic
8 of 35
Goal 1 | Daily trips by mode
Originating in Napa County
Primary mode Daily trips
Drive Alone 72,363 (43%)
Shared Ride 38,682 (23%)
Walk 13,344 (8%)
Bike 2,354 (1%)
Transit 960 (<1%)
9 of 35
Goal 1 | Housing and transportation
• 25% of auto trips in Napa County are work trips from other counties.
• Many of these individuals work in Napa’s largest industries: hospitality and manufacturing.
• How many of those people are making a rational decision to commute based on Napa’s housing costs? Average home price: $460,000 Median monthly rent: $1,297
10 of 35
Goal 1 | Roadway network
11 of 35
Goal 1 | VINE Transit network
12 of 35
13 of 35
Goal 1 | VINE Paratransit network
Goal 1 | Bikeway network
14 of 35
15 of 35
Goal 2
Improve system safety in order to support all modes and serve all users.
Goal 2 | Complete streets
16 of 35
Goal 3
Use taxpayer dollars efficiently.
• Streamline project delivery
• Reduce overhead
17 of 35
Goal 4
Support Napa County’s economic vitality.
18 of 35
Goal 4 | Major Napa County industries
Source: California Employment Development Department (2013, Second Quarter)
Sector Employees (2013)
1 Manufacturing 11,341 (16%)
2 Leisure and Hospitality 11,252 (16%)
3 Public Administration 9,681 (14%)
4 Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 9,368 (13%)
5 Education and Health Services 9,102 (13%)
6 Professional and Business Services 6,536 (9%)
7 Natural Resources and Mining 5,632 (8%)
8 Construction 3,268 (5%)
19 of 35
Goal 4 | Projected jobs / housing gap
71,000
55,000
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
2010 2040
61,000
Jobs
and
Hou
sing
Uni
ts 90,000
2010‒2040 Employment: 27% increase Housing: 11% increase
Jobs
Housing units
20 of 35
21 of 35
Goal 4 | Travel patterns, 2010
22 of 35
Goal 4 | Travel patterns, 2040
Goal 4 | Freight movement
• Sharing the road
• Improving throughput
23 of 35
Goal 5
Minimize the energy and other resources required to move people and goods.
• SB 375 Implements AB32, which in the Bay Area strives to reduce per
capita CO2 emissions by 18% Mandates land use and transportation planning integration
• Plan Bay Area Accommodates housing 100% of regional population growth Envisions all non-ag development inside existing urban footprint
24 of 35
Goal 6
Prioritize the maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing system.
25 of 35 Note: Measure T primarily funds maintenance of local streets and roads.
Current contexts
Planned developments that may influence transportation investments • Napa Pipe/Costco
• St. Regis
• Ritz‒Carlton
• Copia redevelopment
• Calistoga resorts (Enchanted Resorts/Silver Rose)
26 of 35
Projected revenue and costs
In millions; 2014 dollars
$1.32 billion
$2.28 billion
$2.97 billion
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
Revenues Maintaining Existing System Maintaining & ImprovingSystem
$0.96 billion
shortfall
$1.65 billion
shortfall
27 of 35
Examples | Demand management
• Alternative modes
• Staggered start times
• Working from home
• New, cost effective technologies (e.g., highway messaging, signal coordination/timing)
• Land use policies
28 of 35
Examples | Revenue generation
• Sales tax / bond
• Vehicle license fee
• Tourism taxes and fees
• Congestion pricing
• Creative financing
29 of 35
Project examples | Roads and paths
SR 29 improvements • Widening in American Canyon • Soscol flyover • Channelization/St. Helena • Airport/SR 12 tight diamond interchange • Bike/ped/transit Improvements • Landscaping
30 of 35
Bike/Ped improvements • Vine Trail • Buildout of Active Network • Sidewalks/complete streets
Project examples | Transit
• Maintenance/Fueling Facility
• SR 29 Rapid Improvements
• Other Rapid Improvements
• Expansion/enhancements
• Rail
31 of 35
For discussion
• Challenge: Increasing demand for transportation during a period of declining revenue Growing economy Jobs/housing mismatch Aging population Significant transportation need Not enough revenue
• Specific projects, programs or prioritization criteria?
• Other issues?
32 of 35
Outreach and input opportunities
• NCTPA Board meetings
• NCTPA Advisory Committee meetings
• Citizens’ Advisory Committee meetings
• Public meetings
• Media coverage
• Online outreach: Website, surveys, mapping tool
• Visits to stakeholder groups
33 of 35
Discussion stations
• Station #1 Active transportation (biking and walking)
• Station #2 Public transit (fixed route and paratransit)
• Station #3 Driving
• Station #4 TDM, programs, survey, online mapping tool
34 of 35
Contact us
Kate Miller, Executive Director (707) 259‒8634 [email protected]
Eliot Hurwitz, Project Manager (707) 259‒8782 [email protected]
35 of 35