Nashik Smart City Proposal

1

Presentation Content

2

� SWOT Analysis

� Stakeholder Consultations

� Vision Statement

� Logo Design

� Smart City Proposal

– Area Based Proposal

– Pan City Proposal

� Financing Plan

� Formulation of SPV

3

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

4

Quality of Life

• Rich Cultural heritage which can spur economic development and enhance quality of life.

Pleasant Climate throughout the year

Ranked as 24th most literate city and 7th amongst the cities with a million plus population

• Nashik is home of 66% of grape production in the country; provides a unique experience of winetourism and regarded as the wine capital of India

Strong Local Administration

• Strong Executive capacity.

• Managed 30 million pilgrims during 2015 Kumbh Mela in a manner which was incident and accidentfree.

Good quality Infrastructure

• 95% of the population covered with direct water supply connections and water availability in excessof required 135 lpcd.

• 95% of the population covered by sewerage services and 93% of the sewage generated is collected andtreated

• 100% of the population is covered by grid power and power is generally supplied 24x7for allhouseholds

Strengths…(cont.)

5

Vibrant Industrial Base

• Important national centre for agro-based trade; leading trading centre for onions and other agro-products including grapes.

• Nashik has a diversified industrial base and has a presence of leading Indian and multi-nationalcompanies; produces 6.7% of the industrial output of the state.

• As per Survey of Industries Report released in January 2014, industrial productivity of labour of Nashikis higher by 56% as against that of Pune, 43% higher than that of Aurangabad and 39% higher than thatof Thane.

Financial Strength

• City has investment grade credit rating of AA- highest amongst local bodies in India

• One of the few cities in the country with a proven track record of issuing of Municipal Bonds andundertaking borrowings from Banks

Weakness

6

Economic

• 16% of population growth during 2001-2011 is induced by net migration as against the national averageof 24% suggesting Nashik is not able to attract a large number of migrants for work or other purposes.

• Despite having all the ingredients, Nashik has not been able to attract investments in informationtechnology.

Financial

• User charges recovery is low despite overall good quality services provided

Infrastructure

• Lack of an functional airport has meant that easy and quick access to potential investors is restricted.

• Services level inequities within certain pockets especially the Old Nashik city which is the epicentre ofthe rich cultural heritage

• Traffic management is hindered as traffic signals are not synchronised and one third of them non-functional.

• Inadequate and poor quality of city bus services has meant high levels of private vehicle use formerting mobility requirements

Opportunities

7

Make in India

• Nashik an excellent opportunity to capitalize on given its high productivity of labor, strong industrialbase and high quality and reliable infrastructure.

• Nashik Division of HAL Limited has excellent growth prospects given the impetus provided tomanufacture defence equipment in India

InformationTechnology

• Given the saturation in traditional IT industry hot-spots like Bangalore and Pune, Nashik can emerge asan appropriate destination to become one of the next drivers of IT industry growth

Infrastructure

• Lack of an functional airport has meant that easy and quick access to potential investors is restricted.

• Services level inequities within certain pockets especially the Old Nashik city which is the epicentre of therich cultural heritage

• Traffic management is hindered as traffic signals are not synchronized and one third of them non-functional.

• Inadequate and poor quality of city bus services has meant high levels of private vehicle use for meritingmobility requirements

Threats

8

Economic

• Inadequate employment opportunities for the highly educated will lead to out-migration in significantnumbers.

• Increasing population will put pressure on natural resources and thereby service levels and resourcesustainability

Financial

• Financial sustainability is a concern in service provision

Infrastructure

• Inability to address requirement for convenient and reliable public transport will adversely impactgood quality of life experienced by the citizens

Strategic plan

9

Promote cultural heritage part of economic growth and quality of life

STRATEGIC

FOCUS AREAS

Diversify and build a resilient economy

Meet the mobility needs of peopleBuild a sustainable city

Open, accountable and responsive government

10

Vision

Vision

11

“Nashik provides a blend of tradition and modernism as it strives to be one of the

leading cities in India to live, work and play. It provides city living at its best, with

convenient and affordable public transport, safe and sustainable civic services and a

responsive local government. Nashik chooses to preserve its cultural heritage while

creating a sustainable future.

Nashik prides itself in being a safe city to walk and cycle. Here, we motivate and

inspire everyone – from visitors to the local community to go out and enjoy the great

outdoors which are paired best with visits to the local wineries and vineyards.”

12

Stakeholder Consultations

Stakeholders’ consultation strategy

13

Stakeholders’ consultation details

14

Stakeholders’ consultation-pan city

1515

‘Traffic, transportation & parking’ and ‘water supply’ were the top two

priority sectors identified by the people

64958417

31482

16562

5652

16661

9219

1468510831

3806

12926

19191

8439 718010593

33604

12023

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

Logo Design

16

17

Element Description

It represents developing infrastructure while preserving

cultural importance of Nashik. Saffron signifies positivity,

spiritualism amd Kumbh Mela. Skyline from L to R shows

industrialization, iconic widhi mandap at Ramkund & mixed

land use..

Highways facilitate development. Yellow lines incorporate

the fact that Nashik is a vital part of the Golden Triangle

showing connectivity between the business capital –

Mumbai, educational capital – Pune and the spiritual capital

– Nashik.

It represents the eco-friendly nature of the Smart city

initiative. Green symbolizes Nashik’s rich landscape

conducive to good health. City has ~ 22 lakh tress for 14.86

lakh population.

It represents the expression and integration of new ideas and

thoughts. Yellow symbolizes optimism and a progressive

outlook.

It indicates integrity of the governance and people who

continually strive to make Nashik a smart city. The blue

symbolizes educational advancements and digitalization,

safety and security. It also represents the holy river Godavari.

Lastly, all the above strengths are what help Nashik to make

its mark on the map. This is what the red pin stands for.

The modified ‘ i ’ in Nashik with three dots represents grapes

as Nashik boasts of being the Wine Capital of India.

Logo designed by Ms. RutaKanade was chosen amongthe137 entries received for thelogo competition organized byNMC as a part of StakeholdersConsultations.

18

Area Based Development Proposal-

retrofitting project

Nashik City- Base Map

19

Concept for area selection

� Old city area is a home to a large number of temples & heritage structures, hence people from all over the city as well as from outside visit the area. It is also the densest and oldest area in the city.

� This area can act as a replicable model to other 23 core areas.

20

� Hanumanwadi situated adjoining an upcoming township (100 acres), 600 meters north of Gangapur road and just next to the city centre. Thus it faces development pressures from all sides. Hence this area can be considered for greenfield development. This greenfield model is replicable in other areas also and other areas are also under consideration.

Key Issues Identified- retrofitting area

� Roads

– Narrow and congested roads

– Hawkers occupying the road-space

� Water supply

– Inequitable water supply with high level of leakages due to dilapidated water network

– Uneven pressure due to contoured setting

� Inadequate number of public toilets

� Old & dilapidated sewerage network

� Overhead electric wires leading to more number of outages, obstructions in

clear streetscape & visual appeal, safety issues

21

Proposal for Retrofitting area

22

Proposed Interventions

23

� Innovative use of public spaces

– Conversion of British era stone architecture old municipal corporation building into a

museum

– Developing open areas along with riverfront as walkways, cycle tracks and restaurants

serving local cuisine, cafes, etc.

– Creating heritage walks

– Utilizing open spaces at Godavari banks for recreational activities and conducting ‘Goda

Utsav’

� Pedestrianisation and Improved walkability

– Some sections of the roads to be for pedestrians only

– Cobblestone pathways

� Improved traffic management

– Restricting vehicle movements during day-time

– Certain roads to be made one-way

� Parking

– Regularizing on-street parking activity

– Providing parking spaces commercial nodes

Proposed Interventions

24

� Construction of seating arrangements, street lights

� Landscaping

– Tree plantation on the banks of Godavari river

– Creation landscaped zone (by using stones, rubbles) at the Waghadi river stretch

� Built form

– Establishing building codes for façade treatment

� Higher FSI for cluster development & parking

� Encourage well planned layouts and adequate space for infrastructure in

core area as a policy for future development, thus leading to a more efficient

use of land

Proposed Interventions - Plan for Cluster Development in

Gaothan Area)

25Nashik Municipal Corporation

Rule 40 of proposedDCPR.

To enable the re-development of core areaso as to achieve planneddevelopment andenhance livingenvironment .

Minimum area 1000Sq.mt.

Consent of 70% ownersrequired.

Permissible FSI- 4

Option of making furtherchanges in this rule iskept open.

Costing- retrofitting area

26

Sr No. Infrastructure Cost (INR Crores)

1 Road 149.10

2 Bridges 21.00

3 Water Supply 43.46

4 Sewerage 22.60

5 Cobblestone paving 62.13

6 Electric Cremation 2.00

7 Renovation and Restoration of Old Building 12.00

8 Fountains and Laser shows 15.50

9 Ghats Area Restoration 41.26

10 Rejuvenation of Waghadi river stretch 8.10

11 Cycle Track 12.09

12 River Dredging 18.02

13 Solar 4.20

14 Others 28.58

15 Automated Mechnical Gate 15.00

Total 455.03

16 Contingency (10%) 45.50

17 Cost Escalation (10% p.a. for 2 years) 91.01

Total Project Cost 591.54

Scope for PPP & convergence

27

Sr No. Infrastructure Cost

1 Solid Waste Management 1.25

2 UG Parking 252.00

3 Multi level parking 19.50

4 Street Light 23.24

5 Public Toilets 2.10

6 Slum redevelopment 12.50

7 Gardens 2.00

Total Cost 312.58

Sr No. Infrastructure Cost (INR Crores)

1 MTDC 10.00

2 Rennovation of Indira Gandhi Hospital 2.00

3 Electrical Wiring and Solar Rooftops 49.80

4 Rennovation of Artefacts 2.00

PPP

Convergence

(INR Crores)

28

Area Based Development Proposal-

greenfield project

Town planning scheme approach for Greenfield development

� As per the MRTP Act, 1966, TP scheme area is ensured to have provided with good quality trunk infrastructure and properly planned layouts.

� The scheme is prepared with

– Upto 40% of land for roads, amenities, open spaces and land to be kept with the

planning authority for sale

– Upto 10% land for EWS housing

– 50% land is handed over back to the land-owners with a provision of providing TDR for

the land surrendered by them

29

Particulars Percentage Area (In Acres)

Land Owners 50% 160

EWS 10% 32

Road 10% 32

Open Spaces 10% 32

Amenities 5% 16

Land For sale 15% 48

Total 100% 319

303030

Benefit to Land owners because of TPS

3030

Parameter Layout TPSPlanning AuthorityAcquisition of land reserved for public purpose under DP

Owners of land under reservation

feel deprived. Others are benefitted.

Incidence of land for public purpose

is equitable on all land owners

Cost of implementing DP Has to be borne by Planning

Authority

Can be recovered through

betterment contribution and use of

land bank

Nature of Open Spaces and Amenities

Areas required to be provided as

open spaces and amenities are

relatively small useful for local

residents.

Due to large size of TPS >100 acres.

Larger amenities and open space for

use at city level are possible.

Formation of gated communities

Layouts tend to become gated

communities with no access to

‘outsiders’ to roads and other

common assets.

TPS can ensure buildable plots with

public access and city scale

amenities with access to all.

Individual landownerLocal infrastructure Has to be planned, financed and

executed by the landowners. This

necessitates intermediation by

developer.

Planned infrastructure implemented

by planning authority. Landowners

can participate without the

intermediation of developers and

benefit by land value increase

FSI Layout roads, open spaces and

amenities are to be developed

without loss FSI, allowing higher FSI

on net plot.

In the original provisions of law cost

of compensation for appropriated

land was considered as cost of the

scheme and thence deducted from

the value of Final Plots for arriving at

‘contribution’ however the amended

law permits compensation by way of

FSI or TDR

An example of Greenfield project

31

Landuse of Greenfield project

Site Plan of Greenfield Project

3D view of Greenfield Project

323232

Greenfield –TP Scheme Components

3232

� 24X7 water supply

� Underground sewerage network & storm-water drainage network

� Underground electric cabling

� Underground cabling of optical fibers

� Creating footpaths

� Landscaping (cobble stone paving, plantations, street furniture - street lights, seating

arrangements), other civil works

� Construction of public toilets

� Installing solar panels

� Policy for Green buildings

Costing- greenfield area

33

Sr No. Infrastructure Cost (In Crores)

1 Road 104.22

2 Bridges 32.00

3 Water Supply 13.40

4 Sewerage 23.12

5 Power Cost 46.43

6 Jetty Point 1.80

7 River Front Development 10.83

8 Streetlight 5.54

8 Fountain Shows 6.00

9 River Dredging 8.70

10 Gardens 10.00

Total Infrastructure cost 262.04

11 Contingency (10%) 26.20

12 Cost Escalation 70.80

Total Project Cost 359.05

34

Pan city proposals

35

a) Developing a system for Water Supply

monitoring

Pan city solution – Water Supply

36

At inlet & outlet of WTP

At water lifting On transmission lines

At inlet & outlet of ESRs

On distribution lines

Assured water supply

• Adequate quantity,

• Adequate pressure,

• Good quality

Increased

revenue

Conserved

water

MIS for service levels

monitoringCentralized control centre

Decision making based on accurate data &appropriate corrective measures including infrastructure works

24X7 customer care support

Auto-generated billsPrint-out

Email

SMS

Mobile app notification

Automated meter readers (AMR)

Consumer units

Meter reading signals captured and sent to control centre

Leak detection- flow meters

& SCADA

Outcome

s

Alerts about excess consumption

37

b) Traffic and Parking Management system

383838

Pan city solution – traffic, transport & parking

management system

3838

Traffic counting

Capturing the violating vehicles

Pelican signals indicating the pedestrian crossing timings

Signals synchronized with actual traffic count

Parking meter

&

Analytical

surveillance

camera

Mobile app –to locate

parking lots availability

Traffic Police take traffic management decisions based on real-time data of traffic counting

User pays parking charges

Surveillance camera capturing violations

Estimated arrival time shown

on bus stops

GPS on

buses

tracking

the bus

movem

ents

Centralized control

centre

Public bicycle

sharing

Improved

governance:Increased revenue from parking- Improved aesthetics of roads- Improved traffic flow- Better planning of traffic

Improved bus operations

Improved service to

citizens- Convenience of time management- Convenience of parking- Reduced waiting time at junctions

Smart card for all payments

Costing – pan city

39

Sr No. Infrastructure Cost (INR Crores)

1 Parking Management 16.39

2 ITMS 36.70

Management 24.50

2.1 Traffic signals 3.00

2.2 Pelican signals 1.00

2.3 Connectivity 3.00

2.4 Traffic management centre 8.00

2.5 Variable message signs 5.00

2.6 Incident management system 4.50

Enforcement 12.20

2.7 Enforcement automation centre 10.00

2.8 Surveillance camera 0.50

2.9 Red light vehicle detection 0.80

2.10 Alco meters 0.50

2.11 Interceptor vehicles 0.40

3 Water supply ICT solutions 241.56

3.1 AMRs 186.56

3.2 SCADA & bulk flow meters 50.00

3.3 MIS for service level monitoring 5.00

Total Project cost 294.65

4 Contingency cost 29.47

Total Project cost 324.12

40

Smart City Proposal financing plan

414141

Smart City Proposal Cost

4141

Sr No. Project Cost Contribution

1 Greenfield 359.1 28.2%

2 Retrofitting 591.5 46.4%

3 Pan City 324.1 25.4%

Total 1,274.7 100.0%

Sr No. Project Cost Contribution

1 Greenfield 359.1 18.5%

2 Greenfield- PPP - 0.0%

3 Retrofitting 591.5 30.4%

4 Retrofitting-PPP 312.58 16.1%

5 Retrofitting- CSR 0.4 0.02%

6 Retrofitting- Convergence 63.8 3.3%

7 Pan City 324.1 16.7%

8 Pan City- PPP 102.0 5.2%

9 Pan City- Convergence 191.5 9.8%

Total 1,944.98 100%

42

Financing Plan

� Net Deficit in 5 years –826 crores

NMC Financial Projections (As – Is Scenario)

43

Rs. CroresActuals Projected

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Opening Balance 112 155 108 73 293 69 162 113 -109 -286 -498

Revenue Income 626 711 888 772 849 953 1030 1115 1206 1305 1412

Revenue Expenditure 353 422 461 491 519 598 709 796 894 1008 1141

Surplus/ Deficit 273 289 426 280 329 355 321 319 312 297 271

Operating Ratio 0.56 0.59 0.52 0.64 0.61 0.63 0.69 0.71 0.74 0.77 0.81

Capital Income (Grants

and Loans) 116 88 36 260 15 85 277 127 128 129 130

Capital Expenditure 349 435 441 346 308 347 648 666 595 616 613

Project (JNNURM,

AMRUT, Smart City) 149 202 124 44 7 15 309 292 182 160 110

Non-Project 200 234 317 302 301 332 339 374 413 456 503

Surplus/ Deficit -232 -348 -406 -86 -293 -262 -370 -539 -467 -487 -484

Net Surplus/ Deficit 44 (47) (35) 220 24 93 -49 -220 -155 -190 -213

Proposed Revenue Enhancement Measures

44

System Efficiency Improvements

– Property tax

• Improving coverage by Property Tax survey in 2016-17

• Revision of assessment value of new properties and change of use in 2016-17

• Revision register to be updated every year with new rates

• Improving arrears collection efficiency from 36% to 90%

• Improving current collection efficiency to 79% to 95%

– Water Supply

• Improving coverage through survey and water audit

• Improving arrears collection efficiency from 32% to 90%

• Improving current collection efficiency to 89% to 95%

– Advertisement tax

• Improving coverage by survey and tapping illegal banners and hoardings

Improvements through Expenditure Rationalization

– Capital Expenditure

• Capped at ~Rs 300 crores in 2016-17 and then normal growth every year

– This will reduce overall O&M expenditure also

• Overall capex to be restricted to 25% of total revenues

• Non-Plan capex to be restricted to 40% pf overall capital expenditure

Rs. 424 crs

in 5 year

Rs. 45 Crs in5 years

Rs 53 Croresin 5 years

Proposed Revenue Enhancements

45

Rs. CroresActuals Projected

2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Net Surplus/ Deficit 93 -49 -220 -155 -190 -213

Improving Tax Efficiency

Property Tax 9 83 91 80 79 83

Water Charges 4 8 9 8 8 8

Advertisment Tax 0 9 10 11 11 12

Surplus/ Deficit 106 51 -111 -57 -92 -109

NMC Financial Projections (Improved Scenario)

46

� Improved Scenario after Revenue Improvement measures

Rs. CroresActuals Projected

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Opening Balance 112 155 108 73 293 69 172 237 149 114 67

Revenue Income 626 711 888 772 849 953 1093 1176 1250 1340 1444

Revenue Expenditure 353 422 461 491 519 589 688 759 836 923 1019

Surplus/ Deficit 273 289 426 280 329 364 404 417 413 418 425

Operating Ratio 0.56 0.59 0.52 0.64 0.61 0.62 0.63 0.65 0.67 0.69 0.71

Capital Income (Grants

and Loans) 116 88 36 260 15 85 278 128 129 130 131

Capital Expenditure 349 435 441 346 308 347 616 631 556 573 566

Project (JNNURM,

AMRUT, Smart City) 149 202 124 44 7 15 309 292 182 160 110

Non-Project 200 234 317 302 301 332 307 339 374 413 456

Surplus/ Deficit -232 -348 -406 -86 -293 -262 -338 -503 -427 -443 -435

Net Surplus/ Deficit 44 (47) (35) 220 24 102 66 -86 -13 -25 -10

� Positive closing

balance

Structure of SPV

47

Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) Constitution

CEO

Project Director

Civil Engineers - 3 Nos.

Mechanical Engineer – 1 no

Electrical Engineer – 1 no.

IT Head

Hardware Engineer

Software Engineer

Accounts Head

Support Staff – 2 nos.

Eco Development and Publicity Head

Company Secretary

Town Planner

EA to CEO /

and Admin

Law Firm

Project Management Consultants

Board of Directors

Thank You !