nasscom bpo summit 2012: masterclass i beating the benchmar clause - chris pattacini
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
© Alsbridge 2011 Confidential and Proprietary www.alsbridge.com
Alsbridge Europe22-24 Ely Place
London, EC1N 6TEUnited Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)207-242-0666Fax: +44 (0)207-242-0667
Email: [email protected]
Alsbridge Americas3535 Travis St., Suite 105Dallas, TX 75204United States of AmericaTel: +1 214-696-6410Fax: +1 214-239-0698Email: [email protected]
September 6, 2012
BPO Benchmarking: Beating the Benchmark Clause
Speaker: Chris [email protected]
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 2
The Sourcing and Benchmarking advisor
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 3
Summary of Services
The Service Provider Support Program gives you the vehicle and data to communicate to your chosen market, generate targeted leads,
sell at the right price and retain/expand your clients
Communication of capabilitiesto 120,000 targeted buyers
Intelligent leads driven by over2 million contacts per month
Real time market pricing powered by the revolutionary toolkit
Retention and expansion of accountsthrough relationship alignment program
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 4
The ProBenchmark Difference
SaaS Application forNon-invasive Data Collection
Real Time Pricing Toolfor Consistent, Defendable
Price and Service Intelligence
Up to the Minute Reportingand Sourcing Strategy Analysis
Vast Repository ofPrice and Contract Data
Market Leading Service and PriceDefinitions and Standards
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 5
BPO Market - Price Trends – F&A Example
F&A rates have been droppingdespite local wage increases
• Driven by competition, economic pressures & market awareness
However, the market remains inefficient, with significant pricevariances
FAO year-on-year price change
4-5% annual decline, 8% two year
Q3 2012 FAO Prediction
Continued decline of 3-5%
Procure to Pay Example
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 6
Benchmarking Types
Price Benchmark• Measures the “price” competitiveness of a contract• Some firms use “cost plus” analysis of internal delivery for comparisons
Process Maturity Benchmark• Assesses process maturity against targets, or market standards• May reflect specific industry requirements
Relationship Benchmark• Designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the relationship• Helps to evaluate the effectiveness of the client’s governance model; also
used as “marriage counseling”
Contract Benchmark• Evaluates contract terms to ensure they are market competitive
Price Benchmarks are the most common BPO benchmark used today and often the only benchmark written into outsourcing transactions
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 7
Price Benchmarking is a Double-edged Sword
When written and executed properly, price benchmark clauses ensure that the pricing remains competitive with the market over time
This allows clients to sign longer term contracts, thereby creating greater relationship stability and longevity for both the client and vendor
For vendors not tracking the market, price benchmarks cancause problems
Un
it C
ost
– R
un
Rat
e
Year 1 Year 5Contract Year
Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Market Price
Base Contract Cost
Mar
ket
Pri
ce R
isk
Contracts that get too far out of market can result in friction between the client & provider – causing some clients to switch providers
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 8
Terms found in Benchmark Clauses
What Alsbridge Sees in Contract Terms Vendor Risks/Observations
The benchmark is to be performed at the client’s request, starting after transition/stabilization (12-18 months), plus no more frequent than once every 18-24 months thereafter
Client may chose not to benchmark, causing the price to shift away from market
A listing of “pre-qualified” benchmarking firms in the contract that prevent delays when the benchmark starts
Often some firms listed do not provide benchmarking services, cannot benchmark BPO services
The client is allowed to benchmark all the services, or just a portion of the services (typically individual processes or tower basis)
The vendor’s price is not aligned to market on a process or tower basis
The vendor’s price must be at or below a “target” market price, determined by the independent benchmarking firm
Some vendors agree to more aggressive targets, driving results lower over time
A price reset, or service modification is required going forward, when the vendor’s price is determined to be “above market.”
Some contracts allow for termination of the services when price is too high; some have retroactive pricing adjustments
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 9
Price Benchmarking Best Practices
Allow the benchmarking firm the flexibility to execute their benchmark approach – do not require the following in the benchmark clause:
• Large numbers of peers, or require the results “statistically accurate” • The vendor’s price be below the lowest 25th percentile• When peers are used, placing too many limitations on peer selection
Allow both client and vendor to review the results prior to finalization, so that errors and omissions can be fixed, but let the benchmark firm have final say
Allow the benchmarking firm to anonymously reuse data gathered during the benchmark for future benchmarking work
• This ensures that sufficient market data remains available
Require the benchmarking firm serve as an “independent third party” so that it can resolve disagreements with the benchmark using its professional opinion
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 10
Price Benchmark Clause Alternatives
Clients find the traditional benchmark clause to be ineffective
• Costly, time consuming & often leads to a dispute of the results
Clients are more likely to perform their own benchmark or proactively monitor the market
• Much more efficient and less costly• Clients can test market prices & develop a
strategy to address gaps (e.g., execute the clause, renegotiate, re-bid services)
• Often performed with a relationship or contract benchmark to address other issues
Traditional benchmark clauses are giving away to new-age benchmarks, that provide greater value to both parties, and prevent further animosity
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 11
Preparing for the Benchmark
Portfolio AnalysisDefine your services and
develop your MSRP
RFP/Bid Screening
Determine where to spend your business
development effort
Price CertificationCompare your bid price to market before releasing to
your customers
Price NegotiationInform your negotiation strategy with the latest
market prices
BenchmarkDetermine market
competitiveness of your existing accounts
Play ‘What If’ across using scenario
analysis
Quickly ID gaps in pricing and ID price drivers and
their impact on price
Pre-test pricing scenarios to find the
best price
Inform your pricing lifecycle using market
price comparisons
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 12
Use Benchmark Data to Remain Competitive
Questions to Answer How many deals last year were not
aligned with market?• When you lost, were over market? • When you won, were you under market?
Can you quantify the amount that you were above or below market?
How many negotiations did you go into when the client pressed you for further price concessions?
How does your company confirm a bid price is market competitive prior to release to a client?
Have you ever been caught short by a benchmark of your contract price?
Strategies for Success Evaluate new ways to understand
market dynamics and price trends Provide validation of deal prices prior to
submission to clients Provide price information to the sales
teams before putting bids together Qualify out bids where price gaps are
too large Produce client reports to demonstrate
price competitiveness Proactively monitor in progress
transactions for price variances and address before they get too far out of market
Understanding market price dynamics can help you improve win rates on with new clients at the same time, ensure you retain existing clients
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 13
Summary and Questions & Answers
Update your benchmark clauses to reflect the current market realities Don’t sign up for benchmark terms that have been proven to not
work Consider alternatives to traditional benchmarking clauses Frequently test in-progress contract prices against the market before
they get too far out of market – not just when its time to benchmark Develop a market sensing program throughout the entire pricing
lifecycle to understand market price dynamics and trends
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 14
Ben [email protected] +1 214-696-6410
Rick SimmondsManaging Director
[email protected]+44 (0)207-242-0666
Americas Europe
www.Alsbridge.com
Alsbridge Europe22-24 Ely Place
London, EC1N 6TEUnited Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)207-242-0666Fax: +44 (0)207-242-0667
Email: [email protected]
Alsbridge Americas3535 Travis St., Suite 105Dallas, TX 75204United States of AmericaTel: +1 214-696-6410Fax: +1 214-239-0698Email: [email protected]
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 15
The ProBenchmark Model – Pricing Benchmark
Parametric models delivered via a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) tool.Calibrated using 1000’s of actual contract prices, complemented by deep
market price insights.
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 16
Price Benchmark: Sample Output
Overall, the Provider contract is approximately $1 million above the current market prices
The R2R function contributes approximately 90% of the pricing difference from target market prices• The R2R tower is $895,000 above
current market prices• The O2C tower is $103,000 below market• The P2P tower is $218,000 above market
Accounts Payable Analysis
Service ($, thousands)Current Spend
Market Price Variance %
P2P - A/P & T&E 1,897$ 1,679$ 218$ 13%O2C - Cash Applications 2,014$ 2,117$ (103)$ -5%R2R - General ledger 2,764$ 2,014$ 750$ 37%R2R- Reporting 523$ 378$ 145$ 38%Total 7,198$ 6,188$ 1,010$ 16%
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
Current Spend Market Price
$1,897 $1,679
$2,014 $2,117
$2,764 $2,014
$523
$378
P2P - A/P & T&E O2C - Cash Applications
R2R - General ledger R2R- Reporting
$-$200 $400 $600 $800
$1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 $2,000
Current Spend Market Price
Customer Service Payment Processing
Expense Accounting Invoice Processing
© 2011 Alsbridge, Inc. Confidential and Proprietary 17
$810
$986
$1,447
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
Do
llars
Per
Mo
nth
Market Low Market High Current Spend
Unit Price
Invoice Processing
Payment Processing
Customer Service
$2.93
$3.92
$6.15
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
Do
llars
Per
Mo
nth
Market Low Market High Current Spend
Unit Price
$0.82
$1.04
$0.78
$0.00
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
$0.80
$1.00
$1.20
Do
llars
Per
Mo
nth
Market Low Market High Current Spend
Unit Price
$-
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25.00
$30.00
Procurement Agent Level 1
Procurement Agent Level 2
Procurement Coordinator Level 1
Procurement Coordinator Level 2
Sweeper
Non-Production Procurement
Low Quartile Market Client
$-
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25.00
Financial Operations Accountant Level 1
Financial Operations Accountant Level 2
Financial Operations Accountant Level 3
EPS
Low Quartile Market Client
$-
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25.00
Audit Support Specialist - Level 1
Relocation Support Specialist - Level 2
Foreign Operating Support Specialist -
Level 2
Customer Service Level 1
Reconciliation Specialist
Travel Accounting
Low Quartile Market Client
Price Reporting can be accumulated by tower or sub tower (above) or broken down by FTE types within a tower or sub tower (below)
Price Benchmark: Sample Output