national accreditation board for education …nabet.qci.org.in/environment/meetings/raac-85.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 1
NATIONAL ACCREDITATION BOARD FOR EDUCATION & TRAINING
QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIA
QCI Office, 6th Floor, ITPI Building, Ring Road, I.P. Estate, New Delhi
Scheme for Accreditation of EIA Consultant Organizations
Accreditation Committee Meeting for Re-Accreditation held on
April 06, 2016
Present
1. Prof. A. K. Maitra -Member
2. Dr. S. P. Chakrabarti -Member
3. Dr. G K Pandey -Member
4. Sh. R. K. Bansal -Member
5. Sh. Bharat Bhushan -Member
Leave of absence was granted to Sh. Paritosh C. Tyagi, Sh. N.S. Tiwana, Dr. A. N. Jha, Dr. Nalini Bhat and Dr. Asha Rajvanshi.
NABET Secretariat was represented by:
Sh. A. K Ghose- Principal Advisor, Sh. A. K. Jha- Senior Director, Ms. Samra Khan- A.O and Ms. Kritika Sharma- E.O
1.0 Minutes of the Accreditation Committee meeting dt. Mar. 30, 2016 were approved.
2.0 Application for Expansion of Scope
2.1 MITCON Consultancy & Engineering Services Ltd., Pune Following candidates were proposed for additional sectors and functional areas by ACO.
2.1.1 EIA Coordinators (ECs)
Sl.No. Name Sectors
Cat. Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1 Sandeep Sukhdeo Jadhav
39 Yes Yes B None
2 Rupa Roshan
4 - - - Candidature withdrawn for sector 4 37 Yes Yes B
39 Yes Yes B
2.1.2 Functional Area Expert (FAEs)
Sl. No. Name Functional Areas
Cat. Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 2
Sl. No. Name Functional Areas
Cat. Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
1 Kuldeep Mahadev Gurav
WP - - - Candidature withdrawn for WP *Only MSW
SHW* Yes Yes B
2 Yogesh Kisan Raskar
LU Yes Yes B None
SE Yes Yes B
3 Rupa Roshan Shah
AQ - - - Candidature withdrawn for AQ
4 Prajakta Rajesh Chitnis
WP - - - Candidature withdrawn
SHW - - -
SC - - -
5 Rahul Laxman Patil
RH Yes Yes B None
3.0 Application for Supplementary Assessment
3.1 Precitech Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, Vapi Candidate was proposed to cover significant functional areas.
3.1.1 Functional Area Expert (FAEs)
Sl. No. Name Functional Areas
Cat. Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
Empanelled
1 Anil L Choumal
NV Yes Yes B None
RH Yes Yes A
3.2 Senes, Noida Candidate was proposed for the upgradtion in sector 1 & 4 and for new sector and functional area.
3.2.1 EIA Coordinators (ECs)
Sl.No. Name Sectors
Cat. Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1
Deo Narayan
1 Yes Yes B None
4 Yes Yes B
27 Yes Yes A
3.2.2 Functional Area Expert (FAEs)
Sl. No. Name Functional Areas
Cat. Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1 Deo Narayan AQ Yes Yes A None
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 3
3.3 Vasantdada Sugar Institute, Pune Candidate was proposed to cover balance functional area.
3.3.1 Functional Area Expert (FAEs)
Sl. No. Name Functional Areas
Cat. Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1 Deepali Nimbalkar
HW & MSW
Yes Yes A None
3.4 AECOM India Pvt Ltd, Gurgaon Candidate was proposed to cover significant functional areas SC. Details of assessment shall be
communicated to ACO.
The meeting concluded with vote of thanks to the Chair.
4.0 Udaipur Min-Tech Pvt. Ltd., Udaipur The case of Udaipur Mintech, Udaipur was discussed in RA AC dt. September 09, 2015 and identified shortcomings in functional area SE, AQ, RH & SC and scoring less than 40% marks in the aspect- quality of EIAs. The ACO has met the shortcomings by proposing new candidates for balanced FAs which is approved in the RAAC meeting dt. Apr. 06, 2016
Udaipur Mintech was also asked to submit the list of experts associated with them presently and updated QMS, which was submitted by the ACO. On receipt of the same the result is released now.
ACO has been assessed as per Version 2 of the Scheme. Overall Udaipur Min-Tech has obtained less than 60 % marks, hence qualifies for Cat. B projects.
Results of the Re-accreditation (RA) assessment are given below:
4.1.1 Scope of Accreditation
Sl. No.
Sector as per NABET Scheme
Name of Sector Cat.
As per Schedule of MoEFCC Notification
dated September 14,2006
1 1 Mining of Minerals A 1(a) (i)
2 38 Building and large construction projects B 8(a)
3 39 Townships and Area development projects B 8(b)
4.1.2 Sectors approved for EIA Coordinators (ECs) a. Assessed as per RA norms – for ECs approved earlier:
SI.No Name
Earlier approval status (SA/subsequently)
Current approval status (after RA) Remarks
Sector Cat. Status Cat.
In-house
1 S S Bist 1(OC) A Renewed A None
2 B L Mod 1 A Renewed A None
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 4
SI.No Name
Earlier approval status (SA/subsequently)
Current approval status (after RA) Remarks
Sector Cat. Status Cat.
Empanelled
3 H. S. Yadav 1(OC) A Renewed A None
4 Shalini Gupta
1(OC) B - -
Resigned 22 B - -
38 B - -
b. Assessed as per IA norms – for new sectors of approved ECs and fresh ECs proposed:
Sl. No Name Sectors
Cat Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1 R S Saini 1(OC) Yes Yes A None
2 N S Naruka 1(OC) - - - Resigned
3 B L Mod 7 - - - Candidature withdrawn
Empanelled
4 S N Sharma 1(OC) - - - Candidature withdrawn
5 U C Sharma 38 Yes Yes B None
39 Yes Yes B
4.1.3 Functional Areas (FA) approved for Functional Area Experts (FAEs): a. Assessed as per RA norms – for FAEs approved earlier:
SI.No Name
FAs approved in SA/ subsequently
Approval Status after RA Remarks
FA Cat. Status Cat.
In-house
1 S S Bist HG A Renewed A
None GEO A Renewed A
2
B L Mod
AP A Renewed A
None Noise A Renewed A
ISW (Mining
only) B Renewed B
3 Neelima Sharma
HG B - -
Resigned GEO B - -
LU B - -
SC B - -
4 R S Saini
AP A Renewed A
None WP A Renewed A
NV B Renewed B
SHW B Renewed B
5 Manisha Tanwar EB B Renewed B None
Empanelled 6 Rahul Deshmukh SE B - - Left the Organisation
7 Rajveer Singh LU A Renewed A None
8 Sameer Deshpande
EB A - - Left the Organisation
9 Shalini Gupta
AQ A - -
Resigned AP B - -
WP B - -
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 5
SI.No Name
FAs approved in SA/ subsequently
Approval Status after RA Remarks
FA Cat. Status Cat.
10 S N Sharma MSW B - - Candidature withdrawn
b. Assessed as per IA norms – for new functional areas of approved FAEs and fresh FAEs
proposed:
Sl. No Name Functional Areas
Cat Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1 H S Yadav HG - - - Candidature withdrawn
GEO - - -
2 N S Naruka
AP - - - Resigned
AQ - - -
WP - - -
SHW - - -
3 Manisha Tanwar
AP - - - Candidature withdrawn
WP - - -
SHW - - -
4 Rashmi Shrimali AP Yes Yes B None
5 Deepanwita Bhakat WP Yes Yes B None
6 Kamlesh Kumar
AP - - - Resigned
WP - - -
AQ - - -
EB - - -
7 K K Rathore
AP - - - Resigned
WP - - -
EB - - -
8 Meena Kanwar Rajpoot
AP - - - Resigned
WP - - -
SC - - -
SHW - - -
9 Satya Vrat Pandey SE Yes Yes A None
Empanelled
10 U C Sharma
SHW* Yes Yes B
*MSW only
WP Yes Yes B
11 S N Sharma
AP - - - Candidature withdrawn
NV - - -
SHW - - -
12 K V Ramesh AQ Yes Yes B None
13 Manoj Kumar SC Yes Yes B None
14 Swapan Kumar RH Yes Yes B None
c. Functional Area Associates (FAA)
Sl. No Name Areas applied for
Approval Status (Yes/No)
Cat. Name of Senior Expert
Remarks
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 6
Sl. No Name Areas applied for
Approval Status (Yes/No)
Cat. Name of Senior Expert
Remarks
Proposed
1 Nerupama S Jain
HG Yes B S S Bist None
GEO Yes B S S Bist
2 Ashima Jain
NV Yes B R S Saini *Approved subject to availability of approved FAE/Mentor to guide
RH (Mining)
Yes* B -
3 Sadik Khan HG Yes B S SBist
None GEO Yes B S SBist
4 Mahima Jain WP Yes B R S Saini None
5 Kailash Meena
LU Yes B Rajveer Singh None
6 Rajesh Singh HG Yes B - *Approved subject to
availability of approved FAE/Mentor to guide
GEO Yes* B -
7 Md. Afzal WP Yes B R S Saini None
8 Deepanwita Bhakat
AP Yes B B L Mod None
9 Jaswant Singh Sisodia
HG Yes* B - *Approved subject to availability of approved FAE/Mentor to guide
Note: Details of the assessment shall be communicated to ACO by NABET
5.0 Building Environment (I) Pvt. Ltd., Navi Mumbai
The case of Building Environment (I) Pvt. Ltd., Navi Mumbai was discussed RAAC meeting dt. Feb. 03, 2016 and observed that the ACO did not cover the functional area SHW (in-house) and HW & ISW (inhoues/empanelled) expert.
The ACO was given a notice of three months to cover the shortfall by proposing eligiblenew candidates which was approved in RAAC meetingdt. Apr. 06, 2016.
Building Environment (I) Pvt. Ltd.has been assessed as per Version 3 of the Scheme andhas obtained more than 60 % marks in overall, hence qualifies for Cat. A projects.
Results of the Re-accreditation (RA) assessment are given below:
5.1.1 Scope of Accreditation
Sl. No.
Sector as per NABET Scheme
Name of Sector Cat.
As per Schedule of MoEFCC Notification
dated September 14,2006
1 21
Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates; bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug formulations; syntheticrubbers; basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates)
B
5(f)
2 24 Pulp & paper industry excluding manufacturing of paper fromwastepaper and manufacture of paper from ready pulp without bleaching
A 5(i)
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 7
3 25 Sugar Industry B 5(j)
4 31
Industrial estates/ parks/ complexes/areas, export processingZones(EPZs), Special Economic Zones(SEZs), Biotech parks, Leather Complexes
A
7(c)
5 33 Ports, harbours, break waters and dredging B 7(e)
6 34 Highways A 7(f)
7 38 Building and construction projects B 8(a)
8 39 Townships and Area development projects B 8(b)
5.1.2 Sectors approved for EIA Coordinators a. Assessed as per RA norms – for ECs approved earlier:
SI.No Name
Earlier approval status (SA/subsequently)
Current approval status (after RA) Remarks
Sector Cat. Status Cat.
In-house
1 Hrushikesh Kolatkar
31 A Renewed A
None 34 A Renewed A
38 B Renewed B
39 B Renewed B
2 Prajakta Kulkarni
33 B Renewed B
None 34 B Renewed B
39 B Renewed B
b. Assessed as per IA norms – for new sectors of approved ECs and fresh ECs proposed:
Sl.No Name Sectors
Cat Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1 Ashvin Badge 8 - - - Candidature Withdrawn for
Sector 8. 25 Yes Yes B
2 Vivek S. Kulkarni
38 Yes Yes B
None
39 Yes Yes B
Empanelled
3 Shree Prakash Tiwari
38 Yes Yes B None
39 Yes Yes B
4 Seema Awasthi 37* Yes Yes A *See note below
5 Sanjay Shevkar 21 Yes Yes B None
24 Yes Yes A
*Though the candidate is approved for # 37, BEIPL would be permitted to take up EIAs in these sectors on complying the requirements of functional areas SHW by IH expert. 5.1.3 Functional Areas(FA) approved for Functional Area Experts (FAEs): a. Assessed as per RA norms – for FAEs approved earlier:
SI.No Name
FAs approved in SA/ subsequently
Approval Status after RA Remarks
FA Cat. Status Cat.
In-house
1 Hrushikesh Kolatkar
LU A
Renewed
A Upgraded to Cat A for FA SE
SE B Renewed A
2 Prajakta Kulkarni
WP B Renewed B *MSW only
EB B Renewed B
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 8
SI.No Name
FAs approved in SA/ subsequently
Approval Status after RA Remarks
FA Cat. Status Cat.
SHW* B Renewed B
3 Ajay Ojha
WP B Renewed A Upgraded to Cat A for FA WP & MSW. *MSW only
AQ B Renewed B
SHW* B Renewed A
4 Amrita Kulabhi EB B Renewed B *MSW only
SHW* B Renewed B
Emapnelled
5 Shrivallabh Kothe
HG A Renewed A None GEO
A Renewed A
6 Pravash Mishra
SE A Renewed A None
b. Assessed as per IA norms – for new functional areas of approved FAEs and fresh FAEs
proposed:
Sl.No Name Functional Areas
Cat Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1 Ajay Ojha AP Yes Yes B None
2 Amol Kulkarni
EB Yes Yes B None
3 Pravin Gathe EB Yes Yes B None
4 Sandhya Clemente
EB Yes Yes A None
5 Prachi Suraj RH Yes Yes B
6 Nilambari B. Daripkar
WP - - - Left the Organisation AP - - -
EB - - -
SHW - - -
7 Shraddha P. Gathe
SC Yes Yes A None
8 Rashmi Kolatkar
LU Yes Yes B None
9 Rishab Sharma
AQ Yes Yes B None
NV Yes Yes B
10 Vivek S. Kulkarni
EB Yes Yes A None
Empanelled
11 Krishnat Belekar SHW* Yes Yes A *ISW (A) for Mining only
12 Shree Prakash Tiwari
LU Yes Yes B None WP Yes Yes B
HG Yes Yes B
13 Shishir Lal
NV - - - Absent AQ - - - WP - - - AP - - -
14 Seema Awasthi
SHW* Yes Yes A *MSW Only
15 Chintan Athalye
NV Yes Yes A None
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 9
Sl.No Name Functional Areas
Cat Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
16 Subhash L Bonde
RH Yes Yes A None
17 Sanjay Shevkar
WP Yes Yes B *Noise Only NV* Yes Yes B
18 Rujavi Dave SHW Yes Yes B None
c. Functional Area Associates (FAA)
Sl.No Name Areas applied for
Approval Status (Yes/No)
Cat. Name of Senior Expert
Remarks
Proposed Earlier
1 Ketaki Patl WP
Yes B Prajakta Kulkarni
None
2 Mahalashmi Nilange
WP Yes B
Prajakta Kulkarni
None
3 Sushant Figueiredo
WP - - -
Left the Organisation
Proposed now
4 Prachi K Mumbaikar
SHW Yes B Ajay Ojha None
NV Yes* B -
*Approved subject to
availability of approved
FAE/Mentor to guide
Note: Details of the assessment shall be communicated to ACO by NABET
5.0 Anand Consultants, Ahmedabad
The case of Anand Consultants, Ahmedabad was discussed in RAAC dt. April 15,2015 and shortcoming of non availability of candidate to cover the core functional area - EB & SE was communicated.
Anand Consultants had proposed new candidate which was approved in RAAC meeting dt. Apr. 06, 2016.
ACO has been assessed as per Version 2 of the Scheme and obtained more than 60% marks overall, hence qualifies for Cat. A projects.
Results of the Re-accreditation (RA) assessment are given below:
6.1.1 Scope of Accreditation
Sl.No Sector as per NABET Scheme
Name of Sector Cat.
As per Schedule of MoEFCC Notification dated September 14,2006
1 4 Thermal Power Plants A 1(d)
2 9 Cement plants A 3(b)
3 17 Pesticides industry and pesticide specific intermediates (excluding formulations)
A 5(b)
4 21 Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates; bulk drugs and intermediates excluding drug
A 5(f)
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 10
formulations; synthetic rubbers; basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates)
5 38
Building and large construction projects including shopping malls, multiplexes, commercial complexes, housing estates, hospitals, institutions
B 8(a)
6.1.2 Sectors approved for EIA Coordinators(ECs) a. Assessed as per RA norms-for ECs approved earlier:
SI.No Name
Earlier approval status (SA/subsequently)
Current approval status (after RA) Remarks
Sector Cat. Status Cat.
In-house
1 Rakesh
Chandulal Shah
17 A Renewed A None 21 A Renewed A
38 B Renewed B
b. Assessed as per IA norms- for new sectors of approved ECs and fresh ECs proposed:
Sl.No Name Sectors
Cat Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1 Rakesh Chandulal Shah
4 Yes Yes A None
9 Yes Yes A
2 Gautam K Trivedi
9 - - - Clarification to be sought from ACO 13 - - -
17 - - -
21 - - -
3 Dipal R Shah 38 Yes Yes B None
4 Hardik P Patel 38 Yes Yes B None
6.1.3 Functional Areas(FA) approved for Functional Area Experts(FAEs): a. Assessed as per RA norms- for FAEs approved earlier:
SI.No Name
Earlier approval status (SA/subsequently)
Current approval status (after RA) Remarks
FA Cat. Status Cat.
In-house
1 Rakesh
Chandulal Shah
AP A Renewed A
None WP A Renewed A
SHW A Renewed A
RH A Renewed A
2 Gautam K
Trivedi
AQ A Renewed A None WP A Renewed A
3 Dipal R Shah AP B Renewed B
None AQ B Renewed B
SHW B Renewed B
4 Hardik P Patel AP B Renewed B None
5 Purvi Amit Patel AQ B Renewed B
None SHW B Renewed B
6 Awadhesh
Kumar
AP (AFAE)
B Renewed B None
WP B Renewed B
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 11
SI.No Name
Earlier approval status (SA/subsequently)
Current approval status (after RA) Remarks
FA Cat. Status Cat.
(AFAE)
SHW (AFAE)
B Renewed B
RH (AFAE)
B Renewed B
7 ChandralekhaBh
arati
AQ (AFAE)
B Renewed B
None WP
(AFAE) B Renewed B
SHW (AFAE)
B Renewed B
8 Amita K Rathod
AP (AFAE)
B Renewed B
None WP
(AFAE) B Renewed B
SHW (AFAE)
B Renewed B
Empanelled
9 Manoj Eledath
EB A - -
Further details to be sought on assessment and clarification from ACO.
10
Nirzar Ajay
Lakhia
LU A - - Further details to be sought on assessment and clarification from ACO.
HG A - -
GEO A - -
b. Assessed as per IA norms- for new functional areas of approved FAEs and fresh FAEs
proposed:
Sl.No Name
Functional Areas
Cat Remarks Applied Recommended Approved
In- house
1 Hardik P Patel Noise Yes Yes B None
2 Amita K Rathod SC Yes Yes B None
3 Madan Praksh EB Yes Yes B None
4 Veera Panchal EB - - - Further clarification to be sought.
5 Preeti Mayank Mistri
EB - - - Further clarification to be sought.
Empanelled
6 Rajendra T Gohil Noise Yes Yes A None
7 Manoj Kumar SC Yes Yes B None
8 Harshit Sinha SE Yes Yes A None
9 Deepak Chanchad
RH Yes Yes B None
d. Functional Area Associates (FAA)
RA- 85th AC Meeting : April 06, 2016_Rev 01 Page 12
Sl.No Name Areas applied for
Approval Status (Yes/No)
Cat. Name of Senior Expert
Remarks
Proposed now
1 Sainil S Shaikh
AP - - - Clarification to be sought from
ACO WP Yes B Rakesh Shah
NV - - -
2 Bharat N
Chatwani RH Yes B Rakesh Shah
None
3 Mayur Kumar B
Solanki SE Yes B Harshit Sinha
None
Note: Details of the assessment shall be communicated to ACO by NABET
Issued by: Vipin Sahni C.E.O. NABET
Note: In the MOM uploaded earlier the category of M/s Anand Consultants, Ahmedabad changed from A to B inadvertently. The same has been corrected.
Abbreviations
ACO : Accredited Consultant Organization
AC :Accreditation Committee
IA : Initial Accreditation
EC : EIA Coordinator
FAE : Functional Area Expert
RA : Re-Accreditation
SA : Surveillance Assessment
FAA : Functional Area Associates