national achievement test-4th year (05-06) (1)

5/24/2018 National Achievement Test-4th Year (05-06) (1)

1/57

National Achievement Test - Fourth Year (SY2005-2006) 1


2/57


OBJECTIVES To determine what students know,

understand, and can do

To monitor performance of schools over time Trend Analysis

Date of Examination: March 14, 2006

Number of Examinees: 985,754


3/57


300

60

60

6060

60

Number of Items

Total

Araling Panlipunan

Filipino

ScienceEnglish 5 Hours and

30 minuteswith

SnacksBreak

Mathematics

Total TimeSubjects Covered


4/57


100000Lowest Raw Score

2545547605755Highest Raw Score

Percen

tage

Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

NAT Y4 (SY2004-2005) 51.33 39.49 50.70 42.48 50.01 46.80 1,026,115

NAT Y4 (SY2005-2006) 47.73 37.98 47.82 40.51 47.62 44.33 985,754

ENGLISH SCIENCE MATH FILIPINO ARAL. PAN. TOTAL TEST N


5/57


! !! "#

30

20

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

Percenta

ge

Score

Mean 47.73 37.98 47.82 40.51 47.62 44.33

Std. Dev 16.12 15.94 21.27 11.47 17.49 13.53

ENGLISH SCIENCE MATH FILIPINO ARAL. PAN. TOTAL TEST


6/57



7/57


0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

0 17 33 50 67 83

Percentage Score

NumberofEx

aminees

-1 SD +1 SD

____

Mdn

SCIENCE

$% "& '

#


8/57


05,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

0 17 33 50 67 83 100

Percentage Score

NumberofEx

aminees

-1 SD +1 SD

____

Mdn

$% "& '

#

MATHEMATICS


9/57


0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

0 17 33 50 67

Percentage Score

NumberofEx

aminees

-1 SD +1 SD

____

Mdn

FILIPINO

$% "& '

#


10/57


0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

0 17 33 50 67 83

Percentage Score

NumberofEx

aminees

-1 SD +1 SD

____

Mdn

ARALING PANLIPUNAN

$% "& '

#


11/57


01,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Percentage Score

NumberofEx

aminees

-1 SD +1 SD

____

Mdn

TOTAL TEST

$% "& '

#


12/57


100.00%100.00%985,7541,026,115Total

53.53%44.25%527,651454,098Low MasteryBelow 50

41.52%49.16%409,264504,429Near Mastery50 74

4.95%6.59%48,83967,588Mastery75 100

SY 05-06SY 04-05SY 05-06SY 04-05

%Number of ExamineesAchievement

Level

Percentage

Score

() *

+


13/57


100.00%100.00%985,7541,026,115Total


19.98%23.99%196,938246,207Near Mastery50 74

2.99%1.75%29,47917,921Mastery75 100

SY 05-06SY 04-05SY 05-06SY 04-05


LevelPercentage

Score

() *


14/57


100.00%100.00%985,7541,026,115Total


25.71%31.31%253,396321,305Near Mastery50 74

15.21%16.41%149,922168,371Mastery75 100

SY 05-06SY 04-05SY 05-06SY 04-05


LevelPercentage

Score

() *


15/57


100.00%100.00%985,7541,026,115Total


24.37%27.37%240,275280,823Near Mastery50 74

0.001%0.002%1418Mastery75 100

SY 05-06SY 04-05SY 05-06SY 04-05


LevelPercentage

Score

() *

)


16/57


100.00%100.00%985,7541,026,115Total


39.52%50.41%389,596517,225Near Mastery50 74

6.89%3.31%67,91733,964Mastery75 100

SY 05-06SY 04-05SY 05-06SY 04-05


LevelPercentage

Score

() *

)


17/57


() *

100.00%100.00%985,7541,026,115Total


33.24%40.77%327,681418,339Near Mastery50 74

1.13%0.48%11,0944,902Mastery75 100

SY 05-06SY 04-05SY 05-06SY 04-05


LevelPercentage

Score


18/57



19/57


CODE REGIONA Ilocos Region

B Cagayan Valley

C Central Luzon

D1 CALABARZON

D2 Mimaropa

E Bicol RegionF Western Visayas

G Central Visayas

H Eastern Visayas

I Zamboanga Peninsula

J Northern MindanaoK Davao Region

L SOCCSKSARGEN

M NCR

N CAR

P ARMM

R CARAGA

20

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

PercentageS

core

MEAN 42.95 45.03 42.15 41.56 44.28 40.87 42.60 52.17 59.68 45.09 42.81 41.52 39.42 42.30 44.57 33.64 58.61

SD 15.24 11.79 11.85 12.92 13.03 11.52 12.24 13.66 12.57 12.58 12.55 11.91 11.84 11.42 11.55 11.15 12.02

A B C D1 D2 E F G H I J K L M N P R

!

!! " &%


20/57


-9.00

-8.00

-7.00

-6.00

-5.00

-4.00-3.00

-2.00

-1.00

0

1.00

Percentage

Score

POSITIVE 0.48 0.06

NEGATIVE -8.89 -3.99 -4.40 -5.29 -8.23 -2.10 -2.81 -1.43 -2.83 -3.12 -2.42 -3.91 -3.58 -3.40 -3.64


' ,

ENGLISH


21/57


-10.00

-8.00

-6.00

-4.00

-2.00

0

2.00

4.00

6.00

Percentage

Score

POSITIVE 3.43 2.42 0.11 6.00

NEGATIVE -8.06 -1.78 -1.68 -3.38 -2.96 -0.59 -1.41 -0.73 -2.96 -4.18 -2.11 -2.75 -1.80


SCIENCE

' ,


22/57


-10.00

-8.00

-6.00

-4.00

-2.00

0

2.00

4.00

PercentageS

core

POSITIVE 3.41 0.83 2.78

NEGATIVE -8.16 -3.38 -2.87 -5.41 -6.30 -1.99 -2.14 -2.31 -4.12 -2.30 -5.23 -3.94 -1.42 -4.26


MATHEMATICS

' ,


23/57


-7.00

-6.00

-5.00

-4.00

-3.00

-2.00

-1.00

0

1.00

2.00

Percentage

Score

POSITIVE 1.02 0.71 1.46

NEGATIVE -6.02 -1.15 -2.32 -3.53 -3.73 -1.64 -1.81 -1.64 -2.85 -1.50 -3.50 -1.52 -0.94 -1.81


FILIPINO

' ,


24/57



25/57


-8.00

-6.00

-4.00

-2.00

0

2.00

4.00

Percentage

Score

POSITIVE 2.29 1.13 3.17

NEGATIVE -7.87 -2.37 -2.90 -4.49 -5.26 -1.63 -2.09 -1.92 -3.41 -1.66 -4.39 -2.74 -1.94 -2.98


TOTAL TEST

' ,


26/57


() "& ' &%

*

100.%100.%5,6075,407Total


34.53%39.32%1,9362,126Near Mastery50 74

0.48%0.15%278Mastery75 100

SY 05-06SY 04-05SY 05-06SY 04-05

%Number of Schools

AchievementLevel

PercentageScore


27/57


) - "

DIVISION REGION ENGLISH SCIENCE MATH FILIPINO ARAL. PAN. TOTAL TEST RANK

SOUTHERN LEYTE VIII 66.46 62.69 79.35 50.94 68.46 65.58 1

EASTERN SAMAR VIII 65.22 61.81 74.75 53.53 67.55 64.57 2

MAASIN CITY VIII 64.75 57.15 76.52 53.10 67.37 63.78 3

SURIGAO DEL NORTE CARAGA 64.79 58.63 74.38 50.34 63.05 62.24 4

SAMAR (WESTERN) VIII 64.10 57.70 75.14 48.54 65.68 62.23 5

TOLEDO CITY VII 63.80 61.24 69.20 49.67 66.34 62.05 6

NORTHERN SAMAR VIII 62.66 56.79 74.20 49.06 63.00 61.14 7

SIARGAO CARAGA 63.10 52.08 73.30 50.64 64.89 60.80 8

AGUSAN DEL NORTE CARAGA 62.10 58.70 70.21 49.70 62.39 60.62 9

CALBAYOG CITY VIII 63.08 55.92 72.50 49.68 61.00 60.43 10


28/57


) - " .! ' ,

DIVISION REGION ENGLISH SCIENCE MATH FILIPINO ARAL. PAN. TOTAL TEST RANK

MAASIN CITY VIII 11.07 12.75 10.92 10.73 12.44 11.58 1

MASBATE CITY V 7.45 22.64 15.61 2.91 2.41 10.20 2

TALISAY CITY VII 4.61 14.05 11.96 4.15 9.51 8.85 3

BAIS CITY VII 2.14 9.66 11.36 8.33 11.90 8.68 4

AGUSAN DEL NORTE CARAGA 7.40 10.34 8.19 5.34 9.90 8.23 5

ANTIQUE VI 4.60 11.94 9.96 3.45 7.97 7.58 6

BISLIG CITY CARAGA 5.73 18.94 3.50 1.62 7.49 7.46 7

DANAO CITY VII 6.40 8.89 10.64 3.23 5.16 6.86 8

BUTUAN CITY CARAGA 3.34 9.38 8.21 1.21 12.11 6.85 9

ISLAND GARDEN CITY OF SAMAL XI 8.06 7.19 10.20 3.88 3.64 6.59 10


29/57


' &% /&

National Achievement Test Results

Fourth Year (SY2005-2006)


30/57


' &% %) '

Percentage

Score

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

Public National / Comprehensive Hs 47.61 37.98 47.77 40.42 47.54 44.26 899,705

Public Science Hs 65.34 52.57 70.07 49.98 61.32 59.86 5,582

Public Vocational / Trade School 47.37 38.87 48.47 40.88 47.81 44.68 46,984

State College / University 48.78 41.28 45.85 40.05 43.56 43.90 1,723

Private School (GASTPE Scholars) 48.57 33.94 44.45 40.94 47.24 43.03 31,760

ENGLISH SCIENCE MATH FILIPINO ARAL. PAN.TOTAL

TESTN


31/57


' &% ( 0

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

N 50,001 713,398 188,453 6,293 27,609

ENGLISH 45.13 48.48 46.77 43.23 40.50

SCIENCE 36.49 38.77 36.28 32.98 32.88MATH 46.75 48.94 45.19 39.69 40.51

FILIPINO 38.38 41.02 40.02 38.08 35.38

ARAL. PAN. 45.50 48.39 46.43 44.02 40.38

TOTAL TEST 42.45 45.12 42.94 39.60 37.93

30 & Below 31 - 60 61 - 90 91 & Above Not Specified

Percentage

Score


32/57


' &% %) ' (%

Perce

ntage

Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

RURAL 48.28 39.07 50.12 40.93 49.03 45.49 448,927

URBAN 47.67 37.34 46.20 40.46 46.78 43.69 514,491

Not Specified 37.91 30.80 38.79 33.38 38.43 35.86 22,336

Total Country 47.73 37.98 47.82 40.51 47.62 44.33 985,754

ENGLISH SCIENCE MATH FILIPINO ARAL. PAN. Total Test N


33/57


() ' &% %) ' (%

# 1

Percentag

e

Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

NAT Y4 (SY2004-2005) 47.54 46.27 42.31 46.80 1,026,115

NAT Y4 (SY2005-2006) 45.49 43.69 35.86 44.33 985,754

RURAL URBAN Not Specified OVERALL N


34/57


' &% ,!

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

FEMALE 49.77 38.13 48.52 42.05 49.09 45.51 540,903MALE 45.52 38.06 47.25 38.84 46.09 43.15 431,926

Not Specified 36.18 29.06 37.26 31.94 36.97 34.28 12,925

TOTAL 47.73 37.98 47.82 40.51 47.62 44.33 985,754

ENGLISH SCIENCE MATH FILIPINO ARAL. PAN. TOTAL TEST N

Perce

ntage

Score


35/57


' &%

2! &% +

(as Perceived by the Students)

A, 49.29 B, 49.12

C, 41.63D, 40.93

25%

35%

45%

55%

ENGLISH

PercentageScore

CODE DESCRIPTION

AProvides opportunities for

STUDENT PARTICIPATION

B

MOTIVATES SLOW

STUDENTS to participate

CEncourages only a FEW

STUDENTS to participate

DDOES NOT MOTIVATE

students to participate


36/57


' &%

2! &%


CODE DESCRIPTION

AAROUSES INTEREST in the

new lesson

BAble to get varied STUDENT

RESPONSES

CEXPLAINS the PURPOSE of

the lesson

DTEACHES the lesson

SLOWLY

E BREAKS DOWN big lessonsinto small ones

FPREPARES STUDENTS for

next lesson

A, 38.59

C, 37.08D, 38.29

E, 40.11

F, 37.99

B, 38.81

25%

35%

45%

55%

SCIENCE

PercentageSc

ore


37/57


' &%

2! &%


CODE DESCRIPTION

AAROUSES INTEREST in the

new lesson

BAble to get varied STUDENT

RESPONSES

CEXPLAINS the PURPOSE of

the lesson

DTEACHES the lesson

SLOWLY

E BREAKS DOWN big lessonsinto small ones

FPREPARES STUDENTS for

next lesson

A, 50.32

C, 44.76

E, 54.42

F, 47.54

B, 48.90 D, 48.75

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

MATHEMATICS

PercentageSc

ore


38/57


+ $ 1 '

CODE DESCRIPTION

A

Provides

opportunities for

generalizations

based on concepts

taught

B

Gives chance to

make relevant

comments

C

Allows students to

evaluate their own

work

D

Gives assignments

as follow-up for the

lesson (research,library work, related

projects)

E Not Specified

25%

35%

45%

55%

A 49.15 39.12 46.75 41.16 48.38B 48.04 37.58 46.87 41.15 48.43

C 46.00 36.96 48.52 40.14 45.81

D 48.75 38.74 50.03 41.20 48.87

NS 37.00 31.45 37.31 32.96 38.67

ENGLISH SCIENCE MATH FILIPINO ARAL. PAN.


39/57


40/57




% ' !


41/57


% ' ! ' 5 #

Performance by Subject Area

1. Among the five (5) subject areas tested Students scored highest in Mathematics (47.82)

Lowest in Science (37.98)

English (47.73), Araling Panlipunan (47.63), and Filipino (40.51)

2. An average high school graduating student can answercorrectly

almost 5 out of 10 questions in English, Mathematics and AralingPanlipunan

4 out of 10 questions in Filipino and about 4 in Science

3. Evidently, Science is the most difficult subject among highschool seniors


42/57


% ' ! ' 5 #

Comparative Gains Between School Years

4. Comparatively, the Mean Percentage Scores of High School Seniors between batch 2005 and 2006 differed by 2.47% in favor of the previous year.

5. The Mean Scores in all subject areas decreased in SY2005-2006

Highest and Lowest Scores Obtained6. The highest Raw Score obtained in Mathematics is 60 (or 100%)

Both English and Araling Panlipunan equally scored 55 (or 91.67%)

Science got 57 (or 95%)

Filipino rated 47 (or 78%) and a Total Score of 254 (or 84.67%)

7. The lowest score obtained in each subject area is 0 and a score of 1 in theTotal Test


43/57


% ' ! ' 5 #

Standard Deviation of Total Country

8. The score by Subject Area and Total Test yielded large standard deviations The batch 2006 fourth year nationwide are heterogeneous in terms of

achievement level

Frequency Distribution of Scores

9. Regardless of subject area, the distribution of scores is positively skewed the high scorers are outnumbered by the low performers in the test

10. The distribution of scores likewise suggests that more than half of the fourthyear students rated less than 50% in each Subject Area tested


44/57


% ' ! ' 5 #

Comparative Achievement Levels

11. More than half of the high school seniors achieved Low Mastery of LearningCompetencies in each subject area tested English 53.53%

Science 77.03%

Mathematics 59.09%

Filipino 75.62%

Araling Panlipunan 53.59%

12. In the Total Test, almost 2/3 of the high school graduating students showedperformance within the Low Mastery Level (65.63%)

Slightly 1/3 had manifested Near Mastery (33.24%)

More than 1/10 exhibited Mastery of learning competencies(1.13%)

13. 1 out of 5 students manifested Mastery in English and Araling Panlipunan Seldom that 1 out of 5 students showed Mastery in Science.

14. Almost 3 out of 5 students achieved Near Mastery in Mathematics Very few had Mastered the learning competencies in Filipino


45/57


% ' ! ' 5 #

Comparative Achievement Level Gains

15. The percentage of students who have exhibited Mastery(75% and above) in English

Decreased from 6.59% to 4.95%

16. The percentage of students with Mastery in Mathematicsdecreased from 16.41% to 15.21% in SY2005-2006

Mastery in Science improved from 1.75 % to 2.99%

17. The percentage of students with Mastery in Araling Panlipunanis doubled (from 3.31 to 6.89%)


46/57


% ' ! ' 5 #

Mean Percentage Scores and Standard Deviations

18. The top notch regions are Eastern Visayas and CARAGA, differed by 1.0 point in favorof the former

Respectively, Students from the top notch regions can answer 6 and 5 out of 10 itemscorrectly

19. ARMM performed poorly in all subject areas

Students from this region can answer correctly 3 out of 10

20. Near Mastery Level is achieved by Eastern Visayas and CARAGA in all subject areas Except Filipino where both are within the Low Mastery Level

21. Central Visayas had reached Near Mastery Level in English, Mathematics,Araling Panlipunan, and Total Test

22. Zamboanga Peninsula achieved Near Mastery in Mathematics only

23. All regions yielded big standard deviations Bicol Region having the lowest (11.52); Ilocos Region the highest (15.24)

Students representing each region are heterogeneous in terms of achievement level.


47/57


% ' ! ' 5 #

Comparative MPS Gains

24. An increase of MPS by Subject area and Total Test isexhibited among the regions of CARAGA and Central Visayas

25. Eastern Visayas also had an increase in all subject areasexcept English

26. A decrease of scores in the Total Test is shown by the rest ofthe regions

Ilocos Region have the biggest decrease (-7.87%)

Bicol Region having the smallest decrease (-1.63%)


48/57


% ' !" ' 5 #

Distribution of Schools by Achievement Level

27. The number of public high schools within the Mastery Level increased from 8 to 27 in School Year 2005-2006

28. The percentage of high schools within the Near Mastery Leveldecreased

and those within the Low Mastery Level increased

Top 10 Schools Divisions based on MPS

29. 6 among the top 10 divisions are under Region VIII30. 3 among the top 10 divisions are under CARAGA

31. Toledo City ranked 6th is under Central Visayas Region


49/57


% ' !" ' 5 #

Top 10 Divisions based on Performance Gains

32. Among the top 10 divisions in terms of MPS gains, 3are from regions VII and CARAGA, and 1 each fromregions V, VI, VIII, and XI

33. The highest in Total MPS is Maasin City from EasternVisayas Region

The 10th placer is the Island Garden City of Samal of

Davao Region

34. Masbate City from Bicol Region has the biggest gainsin Science and Mathematics


50/57


% ' ! 5

' &% ! /&

Performance by Type of School

35. Among the 5 types of school, Public Science High Schools topped in allsubject areas

36. Private Schools (GASTPE Scholars) ranked 2nd in Filipino, 3rd in English, 4th

in Araling Panlipunan and lowest in Science, Mathematics and Total Test37. On the whole test, ranking 2nd, 3rd, and 4th

Vocational/Trade Schools, Public National High Schools, and State Colleges andUniversities, respectively

Performance by Class Size

38. Regardless of subject area, classes of 31-60 students tended to score higher than that of classes of less than 30 and classes of more than 60

39. Students from overcrowded classes registered lowest MPS in all subjectareas tested


51/57


% ' ! 5

' &% ! /&

Performance by Type of Community

40. Students in Rural Areas rated higher in all subject areas thanthose in Urban Centers

Suggesting that the first group have better learning environment

41. In terms of MPS Gains, neither Rural nor Urban communitiesregistered improvement

Performance by Gender

42. Evidently, there is disparity between genders in the whole test Female students scored higher than their male counterparts


52/57


% ' ! 5

' &% ! /&

MPS Based on Teaching Strategies Perceived by Students

43. Students who reported that their English Teachers used the following, rated high in English:

1. Provide equal opportunities for all students in class participation2. Encourage the slow learners to recite

44. Students who revealed that their Math Teachers used the following, scored highest in Math:1. Arouse Interest before the introduction of a new lesson, and2. Break down big lessons into small ones

45. Students who reported that their Science Teachers used the following, rated high in Science:1. Able to get varied student responses2. Breaks down big lessons into small ones

MPS Based on Evaluation Techniques Used by Teachers

46. Students who reported that their teachers in Mathematics, Filipino, and Araling Panlipunan: gave assignments as a follow-up of their lesson, rated high in the respective subjects tested

47. The students who claimed that their teachers in English and Science provided them opportunities to formulate generalizations on the concept taught, scored better in the

respective subjects tested


53/57


% ' ! 5

' &% ! /&

MPS Based on Influence of Significant Others

48. Students who said that their parents are the most influential person to themregarding their school performance

marked highest in Mathematics and Araling Panlipunan

49. Students who reported that their studies were influenced most by their best

friends

Scored highest in English and Filipino

50. Those who scored highest in Science said that they were influenced most

by their school heads and teachers


54/57




% 3)


55/57


% 3)Department of Education (Central Office)

1. For good Academic Performance, maintain the class size of 60 and below.2. Provide reference books.

3. Instructional materials and equipment provided to Science High Schools should alsobe given to National High Schools and other Public High Schools.

School Supervisors/Managers

4. Strengthen training programs that would enhance the teaching skills and strategies ofthe concerned teachers.

5. Make use of the National Achievement Test results in keeping track of theAchievement levels of their constituent schools.

6. Class observations across year levels

and post conferences with teachers observed7. Provide additional instructional assistance to teachers

on content re-orientation of unmastered competencies on subjects they are teaching

8. Implement school or division initiated demo teaching on unmastered learning tasks


56/57


% 3)Teachers

9. Undertake task analyses for unmastered learning competencies Breaking them into small units, sequencing the breakdown of tasks from

simple to complex.

The Simple tasks will then serve as the prerequisite skills

10. Provide equal opportunities for all students to participate in all class

activities. Encourage the timid students to recite during class discussions.11. Assess the effect of their teaching strategies

Shift to other techniques if found less effective.

Parents12. Close monitoring on the activities of their children with peers or friends.


57/57


Presented by : Nelia V. Benito, Ph. D.

Director III

National Education Testing and Research CenterDepartment of Education

national achievement test-4th year (05-06) (1)

Documents

year sy2005

mdntotal test

nat y4 sy2005

low masterybelow

nat y4 sy2004

performance of schools

mdnaraling panlipunan