national collegiate fm technology conference - mitweb.mit.edu/ncfmtc/pubs/bry_fitchburgbim.pdf ·...

National Collegiate FM Technology ConferenceModeling Your Campus

August 7-10, 2007

- SCIENCE FACILITY MODERNIZATION

1 INTRODUCTION

2 THE COLLEGE AND MASTER PLANNING

3 THE FACILITIES PROCESS

4 PROGRAMMING AND DESIGN

5 BIM IN USE

AGENDA

Scope of Services

• Planning

• Design

• Construction

• Capital Repairs and Improvements

• Facility Maintenance

• Contractor Certification and Compliance

• Leasing

• Asset Management

• Acquisition and Disposition

Division of Capital Asset ManagementThe Commonwealth’s Real Estate and Construction Agency

DCAM Mission Statement:

Our mission is to serve the citizens of the Commonwealth by providing comprehensive public-building construction and real estate services to state agencies.


Summary of DCAM Annual Capital Production

• Approximately $320 million approved capital budget for FY 2006.• Capital production divided among 6 major investment programs:

– Judiciary– Higher Education (including UMass, State/Community Colleges)– Administration and Finance (DCAM’s own projects)– Public Safety– Health and Human Services– Environmental Agencies


ExistingConditions

User Needs

Cost Comparables

User Bench-marking

Timing Requirements

Data Gathering &

Analysis

Continued Next Page

ST01

DesignerSelection

Board

Pre-Study Brief & DCAF

DCAM Director Authorizes Study

PST02 SDSB-07

Pre-Scope Assessment

DCAM Initial Response

PST01

General Objectives

& Work Plan

SDSB00

Designer Selections

ST02

DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS

PRE-STUDY APPROVED

SIGNED DCAF ESTABLISHING

PROJECT

DCAF, Budget &Project Parameters

Approved

Designer Proceeds

Notice

Work Plan Approved(All Deliverables & Payment Schedule)

Submit w/ Sub-ConsultantReports, Cost

& Time Impacts

FRAMING THE PROBLEM &

WORKPLAN APPROVAL

NOTICE TO PROCEED TO CONSULTANT

Study Phase Activity Flow



Design Work

Shops

Global WorkShop

Solution Development

ST-10

Report &Submission

AlternativeSolutions

ST06

Consensus Solution

ST03 ST04

FINAL REPORT

RECEIVED

Specific Objectives

Certification

ST-CERTST01R

Objectives Defined for Construction &

Program

Alternate Solutions Prepared & Costed

Consensus Solution Defined & Approved for Pre-Schematic Design

Transmit Certification to ANF Secretary

Deliverables as Listed for Final Report

STUDY CERTIFICATIONS

DRAFT REPORT

RECEIVED

GLOBAL WORKSHOP & CONSENSUS

PROBLEM RE-FRAMED & SPECIFIC

OBJECTIVESALTERNATIVE

SOLUTIONS

Single Solution Developed

1 INTRODUCTION




5 BIM IN USE

AGENDA

MISSION

• Offer undergraduate, graduate and continuing education programs

• Programs focus on career-oriented learning, grounded in the liberal arts

• Emphases: small classes; extensive internship opportunities; accessible faculty; and sharp focus and dedication to students

DIMENSIONS OF STRATEGIC GOALS

MASTER PLAN AND PROCESSES

• Partners: DCAM, BHE, FSC, and consultant

• End Product: Formal document to guide our future

• New Facilities – Science building– Student housing– Welcome center


Existing Campus


• Modernization of facilities

• Streetscaping

• Property Acquisitions

• Parking Improvements

SCIENCE BUILDING

• Intensify and expand the campus quadrangle

• Co-locate academic disciplines that foster interdisciplinary engagement

• Emphasize active learning; create a “community of learners”

1 INTRODUCTION




5 BIM IN USE

AGENDA

ASPIRATIONS

• Support the mission of FSC

• Enhance aspirations of teaching science and math at FSC

• Leverage impact on Campus Master Plan and long term development

• Create a "community of learners"

• Develop compelling image to attract students and faculty

Support the mission

Enhance aspirations of teaching science

Leverage impact on Campus Master Plan

Create a "community of learners"

Develop compelling image

USER NEEDS

• Five Departments split between 4 buildings:

McKay B & C WingsGeology / Phys. Science

Condike HallBiologyChemistry

Edgerly HallComputer Science

Miller HallMath

EXISTING ALLOCATION

EXISTING BUILDING

EXISTING BUILDING ASSESSMENT

1 INTRODUCTION




5 BIM IN USE

AGENDA

FACILITY PROGRAMMING PROCESS

• Must be participatory

• Should build consensus

• Provides opportunities to explore interdisciplinary learning, teaching, and research

• Must articulate vision and intent

• Must enhance departmental and institutional missions

participatory

consensus

interdisciplinary

vision

CRITICAL QUESTIONS

• What do you want the students to know or be able to do?

• How will they learn in the future?

• How will the curricula evolve?

• What are the current trends and will they continue?

• What is the projected number of faculty and students?

How will they learnHow will the curricula evolve?

FSC SCIENCE MISSION

• Consistent with the mission of the college, the science faculty at FSC is committed to excellent teaching in a challenging yet cooperative atmosphere

• Students utilize scientific methods and hypothesis testing as a way of understanding the natural world

• Learning is experiential and steeped in investigation in order to teach essential content knowledge and skills in critical thinking and problem solving

• Creative teaching and active learning are emphasized while technology is integrated into lectures and labs

• Hands-on experiences in the laboratory and the field bring together theory and application, contribute to scholarly development, and prepare students for a range of careers

• Faculty and student scholarship is integrated and cultivated at all levels.

• As members of the global scientific community we value leadership, ethical development, a culture of sustainability, lifelong learning, and promotion of science as a way of knowing

Learning is experiential

Hands-on experiences

is integrated

USER NEEDS

GOALS

• Increase the effectiveness of science and mathprograms at the College

• Bring science and math departments together in one location

• Improve facility support for current and oncoming programs

• Create facilities to enhance experiential, hands-on learning

TRENDS IN ACADEMIC SCIENCE FACILITIES

Students are active participants:

• Hands-on laboratory rich environment

• Students become engaged in science by doing science

• Group activities, even in the classroom

Students are Active Participants:

Integration of technology:

• Digital projection

• Computers and wet benches

• Multi-media, audio-visual technology

• Instruments accessible to students and faculty


Integration of Technology:

Scientific collaboration:

• Team learning

• Faculty/student research

• Outreach opportunities

• Places for students to interact, study, or wait for faculty

• Atrium spaces can help promote vertical interaction


Scientific Collaboration:

Science on display:

• Active corridors

• Communicate function

• Engage building occupants


Science on display:

COMMUNITYNorth Carolina State UniversityUndergraduate Science Teaching LaboratoryRaleigh, North Carolina


COMMUNITY

St. Lawrence UniversityNew Science FacilitiesCanton, New York


SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

“Old”

Teaching Centered

Remote Research

Lecture Based

Departmental Barriers

Closed

“New”

Learning Centered

Integrated Research

Hands-on/Discovery Based

Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Openness

A NEW GENERATION

TRENDS IN UNDERGRADUATE SCIENCE EDUCATION

USER NEEDS

Existing FTE Existing Existing 44 Peers Existing/Faculty NSF NSF/FTE NSF/FTE Peer

Biology 8.0 12,300 1,500 2,500 60%Chemistry 4.0 7,300 1,800 2,700 67%Computer Science 8.0 7,100 900 600 150%Geo/Geog 2.0 4,000 2,000 2,300 87%Math 9.0 1,700 200 600 33%Physics 2.0 2,300Shared Classrooms 0.0 7,600Shared Science 0.0

0.033.0 40,000

Classrooms: 5,700 in Condike and 1,900 associated with CS

EXISTING ALLOCATION

USER NEEDS

PROPOSED ALLOCATION

Existing FTE Future FTE Existing Existing Version 4 Version 4 44 Peers Version 4/Faculty Faculty NSF NSF/FTE NSF/FTE NSF/FTE Peer

Biology 8.0 12.0 12,300 1,500 19,610 1,634 2,500 65%Chemistry 4.0 6.0 7,300 1,800 10,660 1,777 2,700 66%Computer Science 8.0 10.0 7,100 900 12,090 1,209 600 202%Geo/Geog 2.0 3.0 4,000 2,000 7,830 2,610 2,300 113%Math 9.0 10.0 1,700 200 3,215 322 600 54%Physics 2.0 4.0 7,000 1,750 2,300 76%Shared Classrooms 0.0 0.0 7,600 5,900Shared Science 0.0 0.0 11,540

0.0 0.033.0 45.0 40,000 77,845

Classrooms: 5,700 in Condike and 1,900 associated with CS

DETAILED ROOM REQUIREMENTS (FORM)

ROOM DIAGRAMS

BIOLOGY - B01A

CHEMISTRY

PRELIMINARY FACILITY PROGRAM version 4 CHEMISTRY Priorities

Ess

entia

l

Des

irab

le

Enh

ance

men

t

Space Number TotalID HEGIS Space Type Stations NSF of Spaces NSF

C1 210 Lab, Teaching, Anal/Physi/Inorganic+Semin 15 1,200 1 1,200 XC2 210 Lab, Teaching, General/Nursing+Seminar 18 1,500 2 3,000 XC3 210 Lab, Teaching, Organic (micro)+Seminar 18 1,800 1 1,800 XC4 215 Lab Support, Instrumentation 300 1 300 XC5 215 Lab Support, Instrumentation, NMR 300 1 300 XC6 215 Lab Support, Prep Room 300 3 900 X X XC6A 215 Lab Support, Dishwasher/Autoclave 150 2 300 XC7 250 Lab, Research, Faculty/Student 5 450 2 900 X XC7A 250 Lab, Research, Faculty/Student Computation 5 450 1 450 XC8 310 Office, Department 180 1 180 XC9 310 Office, Technician 100 1 100 XC10 311 Office, Adjunct Faculty 2 150 1 150 XC11 311 Office, Department Chair 180 1 180 XC12 311 Office, Faculty 150 6 900 X

24 10,660

PROGRAMMING

PROJECT ALLOCATION

GSF N:G Ratio NSFRenovated (Condike) 47,300 57% 27,000New Addition 84,700 60% 50,845

132,000 77,84547,300 GSF for Condike and Science part of link

FACILITIES PROGRAM

PRELIMINARY OPTIONS

Option 3

SEQUENCE: • Relocate functions in Anthony • Demolish Anthony • Construct new 124,552 GF Science Building • Move from Condike into New Building • Renovate Condike for other uses

CONSTRUCTION COSTS: • New Science Building 124,552 GSF @ $315/GSF $ 39,233,880 • Demolition of Anthony 21,168 GSF @ $ 9/GSF $ 190,512

Total: $ 39,424,392

• Relocate Anthony Functions 15,049 NSF @ $250/NSF $ 3,762,250 • Renovate Condike for other uses 28,000 NSF @ $250/NSF $ 7,000,000

EVALUATION Pros: • Integrate Sciences, Math, Computer Sciences in one building • Large science presence on the Quad Cons: • Large building at 4 stores plus penthouse • Net gain of 103,384 GSF on campus • Racetrack scheme of new science building limits day lighting

Option 4 of 8

SEQUENCE: • Relocate functions in Parkinson • Demolish Parkinson • Construct new addition for Biology, Chemistry, Physics • Renovate Condike and Sanders lower level for Computer Science, Math,

Geology/Geography, Shared Science and Classrooms.

CONSTRUCTION COSTS: • Condike Renovation 43,726 GSF @ $210/GSF $ 9,182,460 • Link Renovation 3,581 GSF @ $210/GSF $ 752,010 • Sanders Renovation 10,984 GSF @ $210/GSF $ 2,306,640 • New Addition 75,324 GSF @ $360/GSF $ 27,116,640

Subtotal: $ 39,357,750 • Demolition of Parkinson 20,710 GSF @ $ 9/GSF $ 186,390

Total: $ 39,544,140

• Relocate Parkinson Functions: 13,903 NSF @ $250/NSF $ 3,475,750 • Relocate Sanders Lower Level: 9,637 NSF @ $250/NSF $ 2,409,250

EVALUATION

Pros: • Good adjacency for wet science (addition) and dry (renovation) • Mid level total Construction/Demolition costs • Establishes larger science presence on the Quad

Cons: • Doesn’t resolve desire for new “front door” on North Street • Leaves one-story Anthony building on the quad • Net gain of 54,614 GSF on campus

Option 4

PRELIMINARY OPTIONS

PREFERRED OPTION

Ground Floor

PREFERRED OPTION

COST ESTIMATE

1 INTRODUCTION




5 BIM IN USE

AGENDA

AEC PRODUCTIVITY

PROGRAMING SETUP

• 3d Space Style created for each Program Use Type

• Each Space is automatically tracked and totaled in a Schedule Table

Programing with Smart Spaces

PROGRAMING SETUP

• Schedule tables are linked to the building model

Programing with Spaces

• Each floor is seperated into a drawing file

Second Floor

Biology

Shared

Biology Biology

Atrium

Comp. Science

PROGRAMING SETUP

• Consisting of 3D spaces

CURRENT PROGRESS

• That can be stacked on the site

Ground Floor

Biology

Shared

Geology

Classroom

BldgSupport

Atrium

Classroom

Physics

Physics

Shared

Offices

CURRENT PROGRESS

Second Floor

Biology

Shared

Comp. Science

Classroom

Building Support

Atrium

Offices

CURRENT PROGRESS

Third Floor

Biology

Chemistry

Comp. Science

Classroom

Building Support

Atrium

Offices

CURRENT PROGRESS

Massing

CURRENT PROGRESS

SITE DEVELOPMENT

• Existing site context is further added

• By continuing to add information to the floor plans, the model becomes more developed

MODEL DEVELOPMENT

• Additional model views help explain study areas for client meetings

SITE DEVELOPMENT

SITE DEVELOPMENT

Massing

CURRENT PROGRESS

• To Live Section Views

CURRENT PROGRESS

ANIMATED FLY THROUGH

National Collegiate FM Technology ConferenceModeling Your Campus

August 7-10, 2007

- SCIENCE FACILITY MODERNIZATION

national collegiate fm technology conference - mitweb.mit.edu/ncfmtc/pubs/bry_fitchburgbim.pdf ·...

Documents