national fire protection association report · federal emergency management agency (fema), taking...

Second Revision No. 8001-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Global Comment ]

Add the following new material:

NEW SECTION:

35.17* Structural Hardening of Exterior Walls of Building Exits. [Reserved]

NEW ANNEX:

A.35.17

Where additional protection is proposed for occupants from storms, such as tornadoes, tropical storms, etc.; stairwellsshould be hardened. Additional guidance can be found in FEMA publications P-320, P-361, and in the ICC/NSAA 500Standard.

Where windows, shutters, or alternative wall construction is proposed, assemblies should be tested as outlined below.Ideally, tornado-resistant assemblies should be able to withstand the impact from a 15 lb (6.8 kg) wood, nominal 2 x 4 in. (50x 100 mm) member impacting at 100 mph (45 m/s). Assemblies such as windows that could pass such a test are notcommonly available commercially, or may not be economically practical to use for buildings other than shelters. The weightand impact speed stated above for tornado-resistant assemblies is considerably greater than that used in large windbornedebris impact tests as described in ASTM E1886 and ASTM E1996. Some level of protection may be provided by usingassemblies that passed tests that used Level E (preferably) or Level D impact (see Table A.35.17). This could includeassemblies such as windows, shutters, doors, or alternative wall construction.

Table A.35.17 ASTM E1886/E1996 Impact Test Criteria for Large Windborne Debris

Windborne Debris Level Simulated Debris Impact Speed

D

9 lb /-0.25 lb (4100 g /-100 g), nominal 2 x 4 in. x8 ft /- 4 in. (2.4 m /- 100mm) lumber

50 ft/s, 15.3 m/s

E

9 lb /- 0.25 lb (4100 g /-100 g), nominal 2 x 4 in. x8 ft /- 4 in. (2.4 m /- 100mm) lumber

80 ft/s, 24.4 m/s

NEW REFERENCE SECTIONS:

H.1.2.X ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. www.astm.org

ASTM E1886-13a, Standard Test Method for Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, Doors and Storm Shutters Impacted byMissle(s) and Exposed to Cyclic Pressure Differentials.

ASTM E1996-14a, Standard Specification for Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, Doors and Storm Shutters Impacted byWindborne Debris in Hurricanes.

H.1.2.X FEMA Publications.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472.

FEMA P-320. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Taking Shelter from the Storm: Building a Safe Room for Your Homeor Small Business.

FEMA P-361. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Design and Construction Guidance for Community Safe Rooms.

H.1.2.X ICC Publications.

International Code Council, 500 New Jersey Avenue, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20001. www.iccsafe.org

ICC/NSSA 500, Standard for the Design and Construction of Storm Shelters, 2013.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: BLD-SCM

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Jul 08 15:52:05 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In the NIST, NCST study on the Joplin, MO tornado [NIST NCSTAR 3, Technical Investigation of the May 22, 2011 Tornado inJoplin, Missouri], one area of study relates to exit stairs located on exterior walls that had sustained severe damage and thatwere compromised by the tornado. The NIST report asked for code organizations to address that hazard scenario anddetermine what solutions in codes might be feasible. This input addresses that scenario and makes reference to the appropriateASTM standards that can be used to test glazing and other openings in the wall and their ability to withstand debris impact.

This Second Revision introduces some basic language that will allow the committee to continue to work on the neededrequirements.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results

This item has passed ballot

21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All

0 Affirmative with Comments

1 Negative with Comments

0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All

Al Zeyara, Nasser Ahmed

Caldwell, Benjamin H.

Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.

Hirschler, Marcelo M.

Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.

Negative with Comment

Manley, Bonnie E.

While not necessarily opposed to the topic covered in this second revision, I am opposed to how it is being integrated into NFPA 5000.Specifically, I have the following concerns: (1) Per the NFPA Manual of Style (2004 edition), "1.9.2 Annexes shall be within the scope of theproject under which the document was developed, and they shall not be inconsistent with the document itself." Since Section 35.17 is“reserved” with no mandatory requirements, I believe that it is inconsistent to provide so much commentary on the topic of hardening ofexterior walls. See also MOS Section 3.8. (2) This particular commentary really functions as a buried set of requirements. This violates theintent of the NFPA Manual of Style Section 2.3.4.1, which states that they “shall be used for advisory text, explanatory material, andsupplementary information and shall not be used for mandatory requirements.” Why weren’t these provisions included in the main body ofNFPA 5000? While the referenced FEMA documents are not appropriate mandatory standards, the ASTM and ICC standards could easily be


2 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

incorporated into the main body of NFPA 5000. Or, alternatively, if not appropriate for the main body, then these provisions could be includedin a normative Annex. Finally, I am concerned that new reference documents are being recommended for inclusion in NFPA 5000 that werenot made available for TC review during the ballot period. Standards Developing Organizations (SDO) should be willing and able to provideelectronic copies of references for review by the Technical Committee.


3 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



NEW SECTION:

37.6* Storm Shelters. [RESERVED]

NEW ANNEX:

A.37.6

To provide temporary shelter from storms such as tornadoes, tropical storms, etc., a safe room is a viable option.

Construction of safe rooms up to 14 by 14 ft (196 ft2; 4.27 by 4.27 m; 18.2 m2) and for up to 39 occupants should be inaccordance with FEMA P-320. Where the facility is to serve a larger number of occupants, such as a community safe room,construction should be in accordance with FEMA P-361.

For additional information, see ICC/NSSA 500, Standard for the Design and Construction of Storm Shelters, 2013.

NEW REFERENCES:

H.1.2.X FEMA Publications.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472.

FEMA P-320. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Taking Shelter from the Storm: Building a Safe Room forYour Home or Small Business.

FEMA P-361. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Design and Construction Guidance for Community SafeRooms.

H.1.2.X ICC Publications.

International Code Council, 500 New Jersey Avenue, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20001. www.iccsafe.org

ICC/NSSA 500, Standard for the Design and Construction of Storm Shelters, 2013




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jul 11 09:25:04 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In the NIST, NCST study on the Joplin, MO tornado [NIST NCSTAR 3, Technical Investigation of the May 22, 2001 Tornado inJoplin, Missouri], one area of study relates to storm shelters. The NIST report asked for code organizations to address thathazard scenario and determine what solutions in codes might be feasible. This input addresses that scenario and makesreference to the appropriate FEMA and private sector standards for storm shelter design.

This Second Revision introduces some basic language that will allow the committee to continue to work on the neededrequirements.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


4 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


Manley, Bonnie E.

As I stated in SR-8001, while not necessarily opposed to the topic covered in this second revision, I am opposed to how it is being integratedinto NFPA 5000. Specifically, I have the following concerns: (1) Per the NFPA Manual of Style (2004 edition), "1.9.2 Annexes shall be withinthe scope of the project under which the document was developed, and they shall not be inconsistent with the document itself." Since Section37.6 is “reserved” with no mandatory requirements, I believe that it is inconsistent to provide so much commentary on the topic of stormshelters. See also MOS Section 3.8. (2) This particular commentary really functions as a buried set of requirements. This violates the intent ofthe NFPA Manual of Style Section 2.3.4.1, which states that they “shall be used for advisory text, explanatory material, and supplementaryinformation and shall not be used for mandatory requirements.” Why weren’t these provisions included in the main body of NFPA 5000? Whilethe referenced FEMA documents are not appropriate mandatory standards, ICC-500 could easily be incorporated into the main body of NFPA5000. Or, alternatively, if not appropriate for the main body, then these provisions could be included in a normative Annex. Finally, I amconcerned that new reference documents are being recommended for inclusion in NFPA 5000 that were not made available for TC reviewduring the ballot period. Standards Developing Organizations (SDO) should be willing and able to provide electronic copies of references forreview by the Technical Committee.


5 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



NEW TEXT:

38.13* Roof Mounted Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Panels.

38.13.1 Fire Protection Requirements.

38.13.1.1*

Rigid roof mounted photovoltaic solar modules and the roof assembly they are to be mounted over shall comply with therequirements of this chapter and with one of the following:

(1) ANSI/FM 4478

(2) UL 1703 and UL 2703

38.13.1.2

Flexible photovoltaic modules that are adhered to the roof surface shall comply with the requirements of this chapter andshall comply with the requirements in ANSI/FM 4476.

38.13.1.3*

Roof expansion joints shall be protected in accordance with Figure 38.13.1.3 using a corrosion resistant steel or stainlesssteel flashing. Noncombustible or limited combustible, compressible insulation shall be installed between nailers forexpansion joints and within other joints penetrating the roof assembly [OB1] .

38.13.1.4*

Solar photovoltaic systems shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 70 and the applicable requirements of NFPA 1.

38.13.1.5 Access.

A minimum 4 ft (1219 mm) wide clear perimeter shall be provided around the edges of the roof for buildings with a length orwidth of 250 ft (76.2 m) or less along either axis. A minimum 6 ft (1829 mm) wide clear perimeter shall be provided aroundthe edges of the roof for buildings having length or width greater than 250 ft (76.2 m) along either axis. [NFPA 1, 2015(11.12.2.2.3.1)]

38.13.2 Wind Design.

38.13.2.1

All solar photovoltaic modules shall be designed to meet wind loads in accordance with Chapter 35.

38.13.2.2

Wind resistance for rigid roof mounted photovoltaic solar modules shall be in accordance with SEAOC PV2 or ASCE/SEI 7.Where atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnel tests are used to determine wind resistance, the tests shall be inaccordance with ASCE/SEI 49.

38.13.2.3

Wind resistance for flexible photovoltaic solar modules shall be in accordance with ANSI/FM 4476.

38.13.3 Earthquake Design.

38.13.3.1

All solar photovoltaic modules shall be designed to resist earthquake loads in accordance with Chapter 35.

38.13.3.2

Seismic resistance for rigid roof mounted photovoltaic solar modules shall be in accordance with SEAOC PV1.

NEW ANNEX:

A.38.13

Additional guidance regarding the design of roof mounted solar photovoltaic modules related to gravity loads, wind loads,earthquake loads, hail and fire can be found in FM Global Data Sheet 1-15.

A.38.13.1.1

A number of severe exterior fires have occurred involving roof mounted solar panels and the roof assembly they aremounted over. These fires generally involved combustible above deck roof components and combustibles present on theunderside of the PV panels, including polymeric back-sheets and adhesives. The presence of the PV modules on the roofhas the potential to adversely affect the fire dynamics of an exterior roof fire. Potential fire spread can be reduced by usingroof components that provide limited fuel contribution. This could include coatings over the roof cover or roof covers thatoffer improved fire performance. The use of noncombustible or limited combustible insulations or the use of minimum ¼in. (6 mm) thick, unfaced or glass faced gypsum cover boards over other insulation types are examples of suitablematerials. While roof aggregate would improve performance against exterior fire spread, it could become windborne debrisduring a wind event and damage the PV modules.

A.38.13.1.3

The protection of roof expansion joints and roof penetrations are key factors because in severe PV fires the fire can spreadinto the building. Refer to the NRCA Roofing Manual: Membrane Roof Systems for additional information.


6 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

NEW REFERENCES:

H.1.2.X ASCE Publications.

American Society of Civil Engineers. 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400. www.asce.org

ASCE/SEI 49, Wind Tunnel Testing for Buildings and Other Structures, 2012.

H.1.2.X FM Publications.

FM Global, 270 Central Avenue, P.O. Box 7500, Johnston, RI 02919. www.fmglobal.com

FM Global Property Loss Prevention Data Sheet 1-15, Roof Mounted Solar Photovoltaic Panels, 2014.

ANSI/FM 4476, Approval Standard for Flexible Photovoltaic Modules, 2014.

ANSI/FM 4478, Approval Standard for Rigid Photovoltaic Modules, 2014.

H.1.2.X SEAOC Publications.

Structural Engineers Association of California, 1020 12 th Street, Suite 303, Sacramento, CA 95814.

SEAOC PV1, Structural Seismic Requirements and Commentary for Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Systems, 2012.

SEAOC PV2, Wind Design for Low-Profile Solar Photovoltaic Arrays on Flat Roofs, 2012.

H.1.2.XUL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

UL 2703, Standard for Safety for Mounting Systems, Mounting Devices, Clamping/Retention Devices, and Ground Lugs forUse with Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules and Panels, 2015.

UL 1703, Standard for Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules and Panels.

Add to Informational References :

National Roofing Contractors’ Association (NRCA), Roofing Manual: Membrane Roof Systems, 2015.

Figure changes: [OB1] Change the figure to say “compressible, noncombustible or limited combustible insulation”in place of mineral wool insulation.

Supplemental Information

File Name Description

Figure_38.13.1.3.jpg For staff use




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

As photo-voltaic systems on roofs become more prolific, the challenges they introduce to building design, maintenance andupkeep and operational difficulties that can be encountered during fire suppression operations need to be considered. ThisSecond Revision introduces some basic language that will allow the committee to continue to work on the neededrequirements.

This language offers installation provisions and flags some of the concerns that need to be evaluated for PV installation.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All




7 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


Manley, Bonnie E.

I am concerned that new reference documents are being recommended for inclusion in NFPA 5000 that were not made available for TCreview during the ballot period. Standards Developing Organizations (SDO) should be willing and able to provide electronic copies ofreferences for review by the Technical Committee. I am particularly concerned that the SEAOC standards conflict with the 2016 edition ofASCE 7, which has been adopted in a second revision for Chapter 2.


8 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


See attached file for extract updates from NFPA 221.



5000_Global_SR-8004_Extract_updates.docx from NFPA 221


Submitter Full Name: BLD-BLC


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Aug 12 17:09:30 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updating extract text from NFPA 221.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

26 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Ferro, Paul

Heiza, Khaled

Affirmative All


Chrisman, Mark

Collins, David S.

Davis, Richard J.

Day, Richard L.

Dopart, Alan J.

Dubrowski, Victor L.

Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Gaut, James W.

Grant, Kurtis

Hall, William J.

Hanson, Robert E.


9 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Holland, Joseph T.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McElvaney, Joe

McKeon, Thomas W.

Molina, Renato R.

Schiffer, Brad

Schmeida, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.

Woods, Luke C.

Affirmative with Comment

Johnson, Aaron

as stated.


10 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

5000—Extract updates from NFPA 221/Global SR-8004 [BLC]

8.3.1.1* Design Loads. All walls and their supports shall be designed for loads in accordance with ASCE/SEI 7,

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,Chapter 35 of this Code and to withstand a minimum uniform load of 5 lbf/ft2 (0.24 kPa) for allowable stress design or 8 lbf/ft2 (0.38 kPa) for strength design. Lateral loads shall be applied perpendicular to the face of the wall from

either direction.from either direction applied perpendicular to the face of the wall. [221:4.2]

8.3.2.10.4 For cantilevered and tied HC fire walls, a slip joint connecting the sleeves shall be provided on both sides of the two dampers (to separate the ductwork on each side from the section containing the dampers) for HC fire walls. .[221:5.10.4]

8.3.2.13.1 Locations Outside High Wind–Prone Regions. For buildings less than or equal to 60 ft (18 m) in height and located outside hurricane prone regions, as defined by ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other

Structures, the roof surface on each side of the roof adjacent to HC fire walls for at least 25 ft (7620 mm) on each side shall be protected in accordance with 8.3.2.13.1.1 or 8.3.2.13.1.2. [221:5.13.1]

Table 8.3.2.16.2.1 Wall Protection

Note: Protection should consist of blank, fire-rated construction. [221: Table

5.16.2.1]

8.3.3.3.3* Design Loads. All walls and their supports shall be designed for loads in accordance with ASCE/SEI 7,

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, andChapter 35 of this Code and to withstand a minimum uniform load of 5 lbf/ft2 (0.24 kPa) for allowable stress design or 8 lbf/ft2

Height of Exposing Area Length of End Wall Protection ft m ft mm

≤40 ≤12.2 6 1830 41–70 12.5–21 10 3050 ≥≤71 ≥≤21.6 14 4265

of 391

(0.38 kPa) for strength design. Lateral loads shall be applied perpendicular to the face of the wall from

either direction.from either direction applied perpendicular to the face of the wall. [221:4.2]

8.3.3.7.1 Buildings Located Above Parking Garages. A building located above a parking garage shall be permitted to have the fire walls for the building located above the parking garage extend from the horizontal separation between the parking garage and the building, provided all of the following conditions are met:

1. The horizontal separation between the parking garage and the building above shall have a minimum 3-hour fire resistance rating.

2. The basement or first story above grade plane shall be of Type I construction. 3. Shaft, stairway, ramp, or escalator enclosures through the horizontal assembly shall comply with

either of the following conditions: 1. The enclosure shall have not less than a 2-hour fire resistance rating with opening

protectives in accordance with the applicable building code. 2. Where the walls below the horizontal assembly have a minimum 3-hour fire resistance

rating with opening protectives as required for walls forming a 3-hour fire barrier, the enclosure walls extending above the horizontal assembly shall be permitted to have a 1-hour fire resistance rating, provided that all the following conditions are met:

1. The building above the horizontal assembly is not required to be of Type I construction.

2. The enclosure connects less than four stories above the horizontal assembly. 3. The enclosure opening protectives above the horizontal assembly have a

minimum 1-hour fire protection rating. 4. The building above the horizontal assembly shall contain only business, mercantile, storage, or

residential occupancies or assembly occupancies having an assembly room with an occupant load of less than 300.

5. The building below the horizontal assembly shall be an enclosed or open parking structure used for the parking and storage of private motor vehicles unless otherwise permitted by the following:

1. Entry lobbies, mechanical rooms, and similar uses incidental to the operation of the building shall be permitted.

2. Business, mercantile occupancies, and assembly occupancies having an assembly room with an occupant load of less than 300 shall be permitted in addition to those uses incidental to the operation of the building (including storage areas), provided that the entire structure below the horizontal assembly is protected throughout by an approved, electrically supervised automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with NFPA 13.

6. The maximum building height shall not exceed the limits set forth in the applicable building code for the least restrictive type of construction involved.

that all of the conditions in 7.4.3.6.5 are met. [221:6.6.1]

of 391

8.4.2* Design Loads. All walls and their supports shall be designed for loads in accordance with ASCE/SEI 7,

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,Chapter 35 of this Code and to withstand a minimum uniform load of 5 lbf/ft2 (0.24 kPa) for allowable stress design or 8 lbf/ft2 (0.38 kPa) for strength design. Lateral loads shall be applied perpendicular to the face of the wall from

either direction. from either direction applied perpendicular to the face of the wall. [221:4.2]

A.8.3.2.6.2 The exterior fire-rated wall above the cantilevered wall should not overlap the cantilevered wall on the side of the lower building. It can be installed above the cantilevered wall or overlap the cantilevered wall on the side of the higher building [see Figure A.8.3.2.6.2(a) and Figure A.8.3.2.6.2(b)]. In either case, the integrity of the fire resistance rating of the HC fire wall should be maintained by protecting the joint between the cantilevered wall and the exterior HC fire wall attached to the higher building. In some cases, the parapet can be omitted from the higher wall only; however, such a judgment should consider the severity of exposure from the occupancy in the lower building

and the elevation difference between the exposure and the top of the higher wall.an omission should consider the severity of exposure from the occupancy in the lower building and the elevation difference between the exposure and the top of the higher wall. [221: A.5.6.2]

of 391

Second Revision No. 4004-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Global Input ]

Change 'air traffic control tower' to 'airport traffic control tower' throughout this standard.


Submitter Full Name: BLD-FUN


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 12:44:58 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The purpose of this change is to make the terminology of NFPA 5000 consistent with that used by the FAA andtransportation industry. A similar change was made to NFPA 101 (PI# 171).

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 123-NFPA 5000-2016 [Global Input]

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

0 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.

DiCristina, Salvatore

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.

Gencarelli, Michael O.

Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake

Puchovsky, Milosh T.


11 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


12 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 6012-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Global Input ]

Change "delayed egress electrically locking systems" to "delayed egress electrical locking systems" wherever it occurs in the code.


Submitter Full Name: BLD-MEA


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 16 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs theTC on Means of Egress (MEA) to change the term “delayed egress electrically locking systems” to “delayed egress electricallocking systems” throughout the code.

This action will be considered as a public comment.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.


13 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hoskins, Bryan Lawrence

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Jackson, Waymon

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.

Marcyjanik, Brian A.

Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth

Schwarzenberg, Roy W.

Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


14 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 8005-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Detail ]

Add new section head for existing subsections:

27.4.4.11 Detection, Alarm, and Communications Systems.

27.4.4.11.1 General.

Malls shall be provided with a fire alarm system in accordance with Section 55.2, as modified by 27.4.4.11.

27.4.4.11.2 Initiation.

Initiation of the required fire alarm system shall be by means of the required automatic sprinkler system in accordance with55.2.2(3) and by manual means in accordance with 55.2.2.1.6 and 55.2.2.1.7.


Submitter Full Name: BLD-MER

Organization:

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Sep 08 14:50:24 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: For consistency with NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.


15 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.

Gumkowski, Anthony C.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.

Tidwell, J. L. (Jim)

Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


16 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Add new sections:

28.3.4.4 Risk Analysis for Mass Notification.

28.3.4.4.1

Business occupancies requiring a fire alarm system in accordance with 28.3.4.1 shall conduct a risk analysis to determinethe need for a mass notification system in accordance with Section 55.13.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Sep 12 13:33:41 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The proposed new section uses an existing threshold in the Code to tie into the provisions requiring a risk analysis for massnotification. Current thresholds require fire alarm systems for new business occupancies under three conditions which alsorepresent a reasonable threshold for when a risk analysis for mass notification shall be provided. This provision would coverbuildings of three or more stores in height, buildings with a total occupant load of 300 or more occupants or buildings with 50 ormore occupants above or below the level of exit discharge.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Dodge, David A.

Freels, Douglas R.


17 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Derr, Kevin L.

The justification for the need of a risk assessment is based on emergency events other than fire. The primary events referenced were threatsto homeland security, i.e. terrorism. The ability to provide occupants real-time emergency communication during these types of events hasbeen cited as a key benefit. However, the requirements, as written, do not provide definitive requirements and will be difficult to enforce. Forexample, what is the role of the AHJ? Are they required to review and approve a risk assessment? The requirement for mass notificationsystems should be definitive and/or more owner driven. An annex section would be more appropriate for this revision.

Frable, David W.

I cannot support this public comment that requires a risk analysis be performed to determine the need for a mass notification system in allnew business occupancies strictly based on when a fire alarm system is required to be installed. This comment goes well beyond the intentfor determining which buildings and/or structures are deemed at a higher than normal risk of being subjected to acts characterized as terroristthreats that warrant a mass notification system. No technical justification or cited events have been provided to justify this threshold trigger forrequiring a risk analysis. In addition, this public comment seems contrary to the direction the Technical Committee took on Second RevisionNo. SR-8007 which also requires a risk analysis to be completed in a business occupancy. Lastly, the public comment is contrary to thedirection the Technical Committee on Fundamentals proposed in Chapter 11 regarding what threshold triggers a risk analysis for a massnotification system in a high-rise building. The threshold used for a high-rise building was based on NFPA 5000, Section 4.2.1 and its annexmaterial when it discusses associated events that have a comparable impact on a building and its occupancy and when a risk assessmentmay be appropriate for buildings at risk. To strictly base requiring a risk assessment based on when a fire alarm system is required in abusiness occupancy is not reasonable, appropriate, or cost effective to determine a building at risk.

Rice, Sarah A.

We are putting in a requirement for a risk analysis to be done that is more restrictive that what is required for a high-rise building.


18 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Add new sections:

28.3.4.4.2*

A risk analysis to determine the need for a mass notification system in accordance with Section 55.13 shall be conductedfor buildings containing a classroom where the building is owned, rented, leased, or operated by a college or university.

A.28.3.4.4.2

It is not the intent of this section to require a new risk analysis where an existing risk analysis addresses the issues orarrangements associated with a new building.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Sep 12 13:39:01 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The proposed section 28.3.4.5.2 specifically addresses business occupancies that contain classrooms and where the buildingis owned, rented or leased by a college or university. This language is intended to apply to classroom buildings on college anduniversity campuses that fall under the business occupancy classification. Those buildings with larger classrooms (50 or moreoccupants) that are classified as assembly occupancies would need to apply the provisions appropriate to that occupancy.Colleges and university settings have demonstrated a need for better communication of emergencies due to recent events oncollege campuses over the past decade.

Annex: Clarifies that a new risk analysis is not always required where an existing risk analysis addresses the issues presentedwhen adding a new building.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Cole, Anthony W.


19 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Dodge, David A.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Bush, Kenneth E.

This provision could be interpreted to require a risk analysis to determine the need for a mass notification system without establishing theneed for a building fire alarm system. There are no specifications on the nature, sizes, or intended uses of classrooms which would trigger thisrequirement. In addition, the ownership of a building is many times difficult to determine, particularly where there are multiple or temporarytenant spaces available.

Derr, Kevin L.


Frable, David W.

I agree with negative comments submitted by Messrs. Bush and Derr.

Rice, Sarah A.

The points made by the commenters are valid. We are putting in a requirement for a risk analysis to be done that is more restrictive that whatis required for a high-rise building.

Abstention

Aaby, Mark J.

In accordance with the policy of the Standards Council, I have abstained from voting on the item.


20 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 4006-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ]

2.3.3 AISC Publications.

American Institute of Steel Construction, One East Wacker Drive 130 E. Randolph St. , Suite 700 Suite 2000 , Chicago, IL60601-1802 .

ANSI/AISC 341, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, 2016.

ANSI/AISC 360, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, 2016.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This comment simply updates AISC's address.

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 96-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 2.3.3]

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew

Carson, Wayne G. ?Chip?

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.

Meisman, Jeannene Yvonne

Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.


21 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


22 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


2.3.7 ASCE Publications.

American Society of Civil Engineers, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400.

ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010 2016 , includingSupplement 1, 2017.

ASCE/SEI 8, Standard Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Structural Members, 201X 2017 .

ASCE/SEI 19, Structural Applications of Steel Cables for Buildings, 2016.

ASCE/SEI 24, Flood Resistant Design and Construction, 2014.

ASCE/SEI 41, Seismic Evaluation Rehabilitation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, 2017.

ASCE/SEI 55, Tension Tensile Membrane Structures, 2016.

ASCE/SFPE 29, Standard Calculation Methods for Structural Fire Protection, 2016 2017 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This comment corrects the titles and edition years of various ASCE publications to reflect the latest information. Thesechanges to the titles should be carried throughout the entire document.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


23 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Finnegan, Daniel P.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


Frable, David W.

Based on the negative comment from Mr. Humble, this subject should be revisited through the technical correlating committee.

Humble, Jonathan

Please see PDF file titled "NFPA-5000-SR-4005-4015-2016-10-4-AISI-Negative"


24 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

NFPA 5000 – FUN (Fundamentals) Second Revision No. 4005 and 4015 (Sections 2.3.7 and G.1.2.4) American Iron and Steel Institute 10/4/2016 Negative Ballot Adoption of ASCE 7-16 with Supplement 1 necessitates corresponding changes elsewhere in NFPA 5000, including Chapter 35 “Structural Design”. Based upon a review of the BLD-SCM ballots, these changes have not been developed. As a result, rather than adopt the latest edition of ASCE 7, we recommend deleting this portion of the update process and, instead, allow this to be coordinated through a comprehensive TIA or consider deferring this update of ASCE documents until the 2021 edition of NFPA 5000. Additionally, it is worth noting that several of the other ASCE documents are also not yet complete. In view of this, we would recommend that NFPA establish a mechanism to ensure that these documents are completed as indicated.

(END)

of 391


2.3.8 ASHRAE Publications.

American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-2305.

ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals, 2013.

ASHRAE STD 55, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, 2013, Errata 2015.

ASHRAE STD 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, 2013, Errata 2014.

ANSI/ASHRAE STD 62.2, Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings , 2016.

ASHRAE STD 90.1 IP ANSI/ASHRAE/IES STD 90.1 , Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, 2013,Errata 2014.

ASHRAE STD 90.2, Energy-Efficient Design of Low-Rise Residential Buildings, 2007, including approved addendum b.

ASHRAE STD 15 & 34 ANSI/ASHRAE STD 15 , Safety Standard for Refrigeration Systems, 2015 2013 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The problem with the 1st revision of the ASHRAE Standard 90.1 reference was the addition of the letters "IP". There is no needto specify the "IP" version of the document as it is available in both an IP (Inch/Pound) and SI (Metric) versions as separatedocuments. Other ASHRAE standards listed in this chapter are also available as two separate versions (e.g. IP and SI).However, since there was no need to specifically list them as IP or SI, we would submit there is no need to do so with ASHRAEStandard 90.1 either.

Therefore, we recommend that the "IP" be deleted so the user may determine which version is appropriate for the subjectproject (a project being designed and constructed using IP or metric).

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.


25 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


26 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



27 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

2.3.11 ASTM Publications.


28 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. www.astm.org

ASTM A6/A6M, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Rolled Structural Steel Bars, Plates, Shapes, and Sheet Piling,2014.

ASTM A36/A36M, Standard Specification for Carbon Structural Steel, 2014.

ASTM A153/A153M, Standard Specification for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware, 2009 2016 .

ASTM A252, Standard Specification for Welded and Seamless Steel Pipe Piles, 2010.

ASTM A283/A283M, Standard Specification for Low and Intermediate Tensile Strength Carbon Steel Plates, 2013.

ASTM A463/A463M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Aluminum-Coated, by the Hot-Dip Process,2010 2015 .

ASTM A572/A572M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Columbium-vanadium Structural Steel, 2013a 2015 .

ASTM A588/A588M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Structural Steel up to 50 ksi (345 MPa) Minimum YieldPoint, with Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance, 2010 2015 .

ASTM A653/A653M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated (Galvannealed) bythe Hot-Dip Process, 2013 2015e1 .

ASTM A690/A690M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Nickel, Copper, Phosphorus Steel H-piles and Sheet Pilingwith Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance for Use in Marine Environments, 2013a.

ASTM A706/A706M, Standard Specification for Low-Alloy Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, 2014 2016 .

ASTM A755/A755M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Metallic Coated by the Hot-Dip Process and Prepainted by theCoil-Coating Process for Exterior Exposed Building Products, 2015.

ASTM A792/A792M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, 55% Aluminum-Zinc Alloy-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process, 2010,reapproved 2015 .

ASTM A875/A875M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-5% Aluminum Alloy-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process, 2013.

ASTM A924/A924M, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Steel Sheet, Metallic-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process,2014.

ASTM B101, Standard Specification for Lead-Coated Copper Sheet and Strip for Building Construction, 2012.

ASTM B209, Standard Specification for Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy Sheet and Plate, 2014.

ASTM C28/C28M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Plasters, 2010, reapproved 2015 .

ASTM C35, Standard Specification for Inorganic Aggregates for Use in Gypsum Plaster, reapproved 2014.

ASTM C59/C59M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Casting Plaster and Gypsum Molding Plaster, 2000, reapproved 2011 2015 .

ASTM C61/C61M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Keenes Cement, 2000, reapproved 2011 2015 .

ASTM C90, Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units, 2014 2015 .

ASTM C91/C91M, Standard Specification for Masonry Cement, 2012.

ASTM C150/C150M, Standard Specification for Portland Cement, 2012 2016 .

ASTM C206, Standard Specification for Finishing Hydrated Lime, 2014.

ASTM C208, Standard Specification for Cellulosic Fiber Insulating Board, 2012.

ASTM C317/C317M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Concrete, 2000, reapproved 2010 2015 .

ASTM C406/C406M, Standard Specification for Roofing Slate, 2010 2015 .

ASTM C472, Standard Test Methods for Physical Testing of Gypsum, Gypsum Plasters and Gypsum Concrete, 1999 (2009) ,reapproved 2014 .

ASTM C475/C475M, Standard Specification for Joint Compound and Joint Tape for Finishing Gypsum Board, 2002 (2007) 2015 .

ASTM C476, Standard Specification for Grout for Masonry, 1999, reapproved 2014 2010 .

ASTM C514, Standard Specification for Nails for the Application of Gypsum Board, 2004, reapproved 2014.

ASTM C552, Standard Specification for Cellular Glass Thermal Insulation, 2014 2016 .

ASTM C557, Standard Specification for Adhesives for Fastening Gypsum Wallboard to Wood Framing, 2003(2009) e1.

ASTM C578, Standard Specification for Rigid, Cellular Polystyrene Thermal Insulation, 2014a 2015b .

ASTM C587, Standard Specification for Gypsum Veneer Plaster, 2004, reapproved 2014.

ASTM C588/C588M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Base for Veneer Plasters, 2003 e1 (Superceded superseded by ASTMC1396/C1396M).

ASTM C591, Standard Specification for Unfaced Preformed Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation, 2013 2016 .

ASTM C595/C595M, Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements, 2014 2016 .

ASTM C631, Standard Specification for Bonding Compounds for Interior Gypsum Plastering, 2009, reapproved 2014.

ASTM C645, Standard Specification for Nonstructural Steel Framing Members , 2014.

ASTM C726, Standard Specification for Mineral Fiber Roof Insulation Board, 2012.

ASTM C728, Standard Specification for Perlite Thermal Insulation Board, 2013 2016 .


29 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

ASTM C836/C836M, Standard Specification for High Solids Content, Cold Liquid-Applied Elastomeric Waterproofing Membrane forUse with Separate Wearing Course, 2012 2015 .

ASTM C840, Standard Specification for Application and Finishing of Gypsum Board, 2013.

ASTM C841, Standard Specification for Installation of Interior Lathing and Furring, 2003, reapproved 2013.

ASTM C842, Standard Specification for Application of Interior Gypsum Plaster, 2005, (2010)e1 reapproved 2015 .

ASTM C843, Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Veneer Plaster, 1999, reapproved 2012.

ASTM C844, Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Base to Receive Gypsum Veneer Plaster, 2004, reapproved2010 2015 .

ASTM C847, Standard Specification for Metal Lath,2014 2014a .

ASTM C887, Standard Specification for Packaged, Dry, Combined Materials for Surface Bonding Mortar, 2013.

ASTM C897, Standard Specification for Aggregate for Job-Mixed Portland Cement-Based Plasters, 2005, reapproved 2014 2015 .

ASTM C920, Standard Specification for Elastomeric Joint Sealants, 2014a.

ASTM C926, Standard Specification for Application of Portland Cement-Based Plaster, 2006 2016a .

ASTM C932, Standard Specification for Surface-Applied Bonding Compounds for Exterior Plastering, 2006, reaffirmed2013 reapproved 2013 .

ASTM C933, Standard Specification for Welded Wire Lath, 2014.

ASTM C946, Standard Practice for Construction of Dry-Stacked, Surface-Bonded Walls, 2010.

ASTM C954, Standard Specification for Steel Drill Screws for the Application of Gypsum Panel Products or Metal Plaster Bases toSteel Studs from 0.033 in. (0.84 mm) to 0.112 in. (2.84 mm) in Thickness, 2011 2015 .

ASTM C955, Standard Specification for Load-Bearing (Transverse and Axial) Steel Studs, Runners (Tracks), and Bracing orBridging for Screw Application of Gypsum Panel Products and Metal Plaster Bases , 2011c.

ASTM C956, Standard Specification for Installation of Cast-in-Place Reinforced Gypsum Concrete, Reapproved 2010 2004,reapproved 2015 .

ASTM C957/C957M, Standard Specification for High-Solids Content, Cold Liquid-Applied Elastomeric Waterproofing Membrane withIntegral Wearing Surface, 2015.

ASTM C1002, Standard Specification for Steel Self-Piercing Tapping Screws for the Application of Gypsum Panel Products or MetalPlaster Bases to Wood Studs or Steel Studs, 2014.

ASTM C1029, Standard Specification for Spray-Applied Rigid Cellular Polyurethane Thermal Insulation, 2013 2015 .

ASTM C1032, Standard Specification for Woven Wire Plaster Base, 2014.

ASTM C1047, Standard Specification for Accessories for Gypsum Wallboard and Gypsum Veneer Base, 2014a.

ASTM C1063, Standard Specification for Installation of Lathing and Furring to Receive Interior and Exterior Portland Cement-BasedPlaster, 2014d 2016a .

ASTM C1167, Standard Specification for Clay Roof Tiles, 2011.

ASTM C1177/C1177M, Standard Specification for Glass Mat Gypsum Substrate for Use as Sheathing, 2013.

ASTM C1178/C1178M, Standard Specification for Glass Mat Water-Resistant Gypsum Backing Panel, 2013.

ASTM C1278/C1278M, Standard Specification for Fiber-Reinforced Gypsum Panel, 2007a, reapproved 2011 2015 .

ASTM C 1280 C1280 , Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Sheathing, 2013a.

ASTM C 1289 C1289 , Standard Specification for Faced Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation Board, 2014a 2016 .

ASTM C1328/C1328M, Standard Specification for Plastic (Stucco) Cement, 2012.

ASTM C1396/C1396M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Board, 2014a.

ASTM C1491, Standard Specification for Concrete Roof Pavers, 2014.

ASTM C1492, Standard Specification for Concrete Roof Tile,2003 reapproved 2009.

ASTM C1629/C1629M, Standard Classification for Abuse-Resistant Nondecorated Interior Gypsum Panel Products and Fiber-Reinforced Cement Panels, 2014a 2015 .

ASTM D25, Standard Specification for Round Timber Piles, 2012.

ASTM D41/D41M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Primer Used in Roofing, Dampproofing, and Waterproofing, 2011.

ASTM D43/D43M, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Primer Used in Roofing, Dampproofing, and Waterproofing, 2013e1.

ASTM D86, Standard Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products at Atmospheric Pressure,2012 2015 .

ASTM D225, Standard Specification for Asphalt Shingles (Organic Felt) Surfaced with Mineral Granules, 2007 (withdrawn) .

ASTM D226/D226M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Saturated Organic Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 2009.

ASTM D227/D227M, Standard Specification for Coal-Tar-Saturated Organic Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 2003(2012)e1.

ASTM D312/312M , Standard Specification for Asphalt Used in Roofing, 2000 reapproved 2006 2016 .

ASTM D450/D450M, Standard Specification for Coal-Tar Pitch Used in Roofing, Dampproofing, and Waterproofing, 2007 (2013)e1.


30 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

ASTM D635, Standard Test Method for Rate of Burning and/or Extent and Time of Burning of Plastics in a Horizontal Position, 2014.

ASTM D1079, Standard Terminology Relating to Roofing, Waterproofing, and Bituminous Materials, 2013e1 2016 .

ASTM D1143/D1143M, Standard Test Methods for Deep Foundations Under Static Axial Compressive Load,2007, reapproved 2013.

ASTM D1227, Standard Specification for Emulsified Asphalt Used as a Protective Coating for Roofing, 2013.

ASTM D1761, Standard Test Methods for Mechanical Fasteners in Wood, 2012.

ASTM D1863/D1863M, Standard Specification for Mineral Aggregate Used on Built-Up Roofs, 2005, 2012 Errata 1.

ASTM D1929, Standard Test Method for Determining Ignition Temperature of Plastics, 2014 2016 .

ASTM D1970/D1970M, Standard Specification for Self-Adhering Polymer Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials Used as SteepRoofing Underlayment for Ice Dam Protection, 2015 2015a .

ASTM D2178/D2178M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Glass Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 2014 2015a .

ASTM D2487, Standard Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), 2011.

ASTM D2626/D2626M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Saturated and Coated Organic Felt Base Sheet Used in Roofing, 2004(2012)e1.

ASTM D2823, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roof Coatings, 2005 (Withdrawn withdrawn 2011).

ASTM D2843, Standard Test Method for Density of Smoke from the Burning or Decomposition of Plastics, 2010 2016 .

ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials, 2006, reapproved2011 2015 .

ASTM D2898, Standard Test Methods for Accelerated Weathering of Fire-Retardant-Treated Wood for Fire Testing, 2010.

ASTM D3019, Standard Specification for Lap Cement Used with Asphalt Roll Roofing, Non Fibered, Asbestos Fibered, and NonAsbestos Fibered, 2008.

ASTM D3161/D3161M, Standard Test Method for Wind-Resistance of Asphalt Shingles (Fan-Induced Method), 2014 2016 .

ASTM D3201/D3201M, Standard Test Method for Hygroscopic Properties of Fire-Retardant Wood and Wood-Base Products, 2013.

ASTM D3462/D3462M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Shingles Made from Glass Felt and Surfaced with Mineral Granules,2010a.

ASTM D3468/D3468M, Standard Specification for Liquid-Applied Neoprene and Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene Used in Roofing andWaterproofing, 1999, (2013)e1.

ASTM D3737, Standard Practice for Establishing Allowable Properties for Structural Glued Laminated Timber (Glulam), 2012.

ASTM D3746, Standard Test Method for Impact Resistance of Bituminous Roofing Systems, 1985,reapproved 2008.

ASTM D3747, Standard Specification for Emulsified Asphalt Adhesive for Adhering Roof Insulation, 1979 (2007) (withdrawn).

ASTM D3909/D3909M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roll Roofing (Glass Felt) Surfaced with Mineral Granules, 2014.

ASTM D4022/D4022M RL, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Roof Cement, Asbestos Containing, 2007 (2012)e1.

ASTM D4318, Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, 2010 (2014)e1.

ASTM D4434/D4434M, Standard Specification for Poly (Vinyl Chloride) Sheet Roofing, 2012 2015 .

ASTM D4479/D4479M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roof Coatings — Asbestos-Free, 2007, (2012)e1.

ASTM D4586/D4586M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roof Cement, Asbestos-Free, 2007 (2012)e1.

ASTM D4601/D4601M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Coated Glass Fiber Base Sheet Used in Roofing, 2004 (2012)e1.

ASTM D4637/D4637M, Standard Specification for EPDM Sheet Used in a Single-Ply Roof Membrane, 2010 2014e1 2015 .

ASTM D4869/D4869M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Saturated Organic Felt Underlayment Used in Steep Slope Roofing,2005(2011)e1 2016 .

ASTM D4897/D4897M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Coated Glass-Fiber Venting Base Sheet Used in Roofing,2001,reapproved 2009.

ASTM D4990, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Glass Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 1997a (2005)e1 , reapproved2011 2013 .

ASTM D5019, Standard Specification for Reinforced Non-Vulcanized Polymeric Sheet Used in Roofing Membrane, 2007a(Withdrawn standard withdrawn ).

ASTM D5055, Standard Specification for Establishing and Monitoring Structural Capacities of Prefabricated Wood I-Joists, 2013e1.

ASTM D5456, Standard Specification for Evaluation of Structural Composite Lumber Products, 2014b.

ASTM D5516, Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Flexural Properties of Fire-Retardant Treated Softwood Plywood Exposed toElevated Temperatures, 2009.

ASTM D5643, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Roof Cement, Asbestos Free, 2009 2006, reapproved 2012e1 .

ASTM D5664, Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Effects of Fire-Retardant Treatments and Elevated Temperatures onStrength Properties of Fire-Retardant Treated Lumber, 2010.

ASTM D5665/D5665M, Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Fabrics Used in Cold-Applied Roofing and Waterproofing, 1999a(2014)e1.

ASTM D5726, Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Fabrics Used in Hot-Applied Roofing and Waterproofing, 1998, reapproved


31 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

2013.

ASTM D6083, Standard Specification for Liquid Applied Acrylic Coating Used in Roofing, 2005e1 (Withdrawn standard withdrawn ).

ASTM D6162/D6161M, Standard Specification for Styrene Butadiene Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials Using aCombination of Polyester and Glass Fiber Reinforcements, 2000a (2015)e1.

ASTM D6163/D6163M, Standard Specification for Styrene Butadiene Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials UsingGlass Fiber Reinforcements, 2000 (2015)e1.

ASTM D6164/D6164M, Standard Specification for Styrene Butadiene Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials UsingPolyester Reinforcements, 2011.

ASTM D6222/D6222M, Standard Specification for Atactic Polypropylene (APP) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials UsingPolyester Reinforcements, 2011.

ASTM D6223/D6223M, Standard Specification for Atactic Polypropylene (APP) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials Using aCombination of Polyester and Glass Fiber Reinforcements, 2002 (2009)e1.

ASTM D6298, Standard Specification for Fiberglass Reinforced Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet with aFactory Applied Metal Surface,2013.

ASTM D6305, Standard Practice for Calculating Bending Strength Design Adjustment Factors for Fire-Retardant-Treated PlywoodRoof Sheathing, 2008. , reapproved 2015e1.

ASTM D6380/D6380M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roll Roofing (Organic Felt), 2003 (2013)e1.

ASTM D6381/D6381M, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Asphalt Shingle Mechanical Uplift Resistance, 2008(2013)e1 2015 .

ASTM D6694/D6694M, Standard Specification for Liquid-Applied Silicone Coating Used in Spray Polyurethane Foam Roofing,2008(2013)e1 2015 .

ASTM D6754/D6754M, Standard Specification for Ketone Ethylene Ester Based Sheet Roofing,2010 2015 .

ASTM D6757, Standard Specification for Steep-Slope Underlayment Felt Containing Inorganic Fibers, 2007, reapproved 2013.

ASTM D6841, Standard Practice for Calculating Design Valve Treatment Adjustment Factors for Fire-Retardant-TreatedLumber,2008 2016 .

ASTM D6878/D6878M, Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Polyolefin Based Sheet Roofing, 2013.

ASTM D7032, Standard Specification for Establishing Performance Ratings for Wood-Plastic Composite Deck Boards and GuardrailSystems (Guards or Handrails),2014 2015.

ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2015a 2015b .

ASTM E90, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions andElements, 2009.

ASTM E96/E96M, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials, 2014 2016 .

ASTM E108, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Roof Coverings, 2011.

ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials,2014 2016 .

ASTM E136, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750°C,2012 2016 .

ASTM E492, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling AssembliesUsing the Tapping Machine, 2009, reapproved 2016e1 .

ASTM E605, Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material (SFRM) Applied to StructuralMembers, 1993, reapproved 2011 2015e1 .

ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor-Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat EnergySource,2014c 2015e1 .

ASTM E736, Standard Test Method for Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials Applied to Structural Members,2000. reapproved 2011 2015e1 .

ASTM E814, Standard Test Method for Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops, 2013a.

ASTM E970, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Exposed Attic Floor Insulation Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source,2014.

ASTM E1300, Standard Practice for Determining Load Resistance of Glass in Buildings, 2012 (2012)e1.

ASTM E1591, Standard Guide for Obtaining Data for Deterministic Fire Models, 2013.

ASTM E1592, Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Sheet Metal Roof and Siding Systems by Uniform Static AirPressure Difference, 2005.

ASTM E1602, Standard Guide for Construction of Solid Fuel Burning Masonry Heaters, 2005, reapproved 2012.

ASTM E1966, Standard Test Method for Fire-Resistive Joint Systems, , reapproved 2012 2015 .

ASTM E2072, Standard Specification for Photoluminescent (Phoshorescent) Safety Markings, 2014.

ASTM E2073, Standard Test Method for Photopic Luminance of Photoluminescent (Phoshorescent) Markings, 2010.

ASTM E2074, Standard Test Method for Fire tests of Door Assemblies, Including Positive Pressure Testing of Side-Hinged andPivoted Swinging Door Assemblies , 2000 e1 (withdrawn 2007).

ASTM E2174, Standard Practice for On-Site Inspection of Installed Fire Stops, 2014b.


32 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

ASTM E2307, Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance of Perimeter Fire Barrier Systems Using Intermediate-Scale,Multi-story Test Apparatus, 2015a 2015b .

ASTM E2393, Standard Practice for On-Site Inspection of Installed Fire Resistive Joint Systems and Perimeter Fire Barriers,2010a reapproved 2015 .

ASTM E2404, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Textile, Paper or Polymeric (including Vinyl) Wall orCeiling Coverings, and of Facings and Wood Veneers Intended to be Applied on Site Over a Wood Substrate to Assess SurfaceBurning Characteristics, 2015a.

ASTM E2573, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Site-fabricated Stretch Systems to Assess SurfaceBurning Characteristics, 2012.

ASTM E2599, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Reflective Insulation , Radiant Barrier, and Vinyl StretchCeiling Materials for Building Applications to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics, 2015.

ASTM E2652, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Tube Furnace with a Cone-shaped Airflow Stabilizer, at 750Degrees C, 2012 2016 .

ASTM E2768, Standard Test Method for Extended Duration Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2011.

ASTM E2965, Standard Test for Determination of Low Levels of Heat Release Rate for Materials and Products Using an OxygenConsumption Calorimeter , 2016.

ASTM F547, Standard Terminology of Nails for Use with Wood and Wood-Base Materials, 2006, reapproved 2012.

ASTM F851, Standard Test Method for Self-Rising Seat Mechanisms, 1987, reapproved 2013.

ASTM F1292, Standard Specification for Impact Attenuation of Surfacing Materials Within the Use Zone of Playground Equipment ,2013.

ASTM F1577, Standard Test Methods for Detention Locks for Swinging Doors, 2005, reapproved 2012.

ASTM F1667, Standard Specification for Driven Fasteners: Nails, Spikes, and Staples, 2013 2015 .

ASTM F1951, Standard Specification for Determination of Accessibility of Surface Systems Under and Around PlaygroundEquipment , 2014.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates ASTM referenced publications.

Response Message:



Public Comment No. 61-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 2.3]

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.


33 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


34 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


2.3.13 AWPA Publications.

American Wood Protection Association, P.O. Box 361784, Birmingham, AL 35236-1784.

AWPA C1, Standard for Preservative Treatment of All Timber Products by Pressure Processes, 2003 (Withdrawnstandard withdrawn ).

AWPA C2, Standard for the Preservative Treatment of Lumber, Timber, Bridge Ties, and Mine Ties by Pressure Processes, 2002.

AWPA C3, Piles — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA C4, Poles — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA C9, Plywood — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA C14, Wood for Highway Construction — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA C15, Wood for Commercial-Residential Construction — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA C16, Wood Used on Farms — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA C22, Lumber and Plywood for Permanent Wood Foundations — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA C23, Round Poles and Posts Used in Building Construction — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA C24, Sawn Timber Piles Used for Residential and Commercial Building, 2003.

AWPA C28, Standard for Preservative Treatment of Structural Glued Laminated Members and Lamination Before Gluing of SouthernPine, Coastal Douglas Fir, Hemfir, and Western Hemlock by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA C31, Lumber Used Out of Contact with the Ground and Continuously Protected from Liquid Water — Treatment by PressureProcesses, 2002.

AWPA C33, Standard for Preservative Treatment of Structural Composite Lumber by Pressure Processes, 2003.

AWPA M4, Standard for the Care of Preservative-Treated Wood Products,2011 2015 .

AWPA P1/P13, Standard for Creosote Preservative, 2013.

AWPA P2, Standard for Creosote Solutions, 2013.

AWPA P5, Standard for Waterborne Preservatives, 2014.

AWPA P8, Standard for Oil-borne Preservatives, 2014.

AWPA P9, Standards for Solvents and Formulations for Organic Preservative Systems, 2010.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates AWPA referenced publication.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


35 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


36 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


2.3.19 FM Global Publications.

FM Global, 270 Central Avenue, P.O. Box 7500, Johnston, RI 02919-4923.

FM Approval 4411, Insulated Wall Constructions, 1974.

FM Approval 4435, Edge Systems Used with Low Slope Roofing Systems, 2013.

FM Approval 4450, Class I Insulated Steel Deck Roofs, 1989.

FM Approval 4470, Single-Ply, Polymer-modified Bitumen Sheet, Built-up Roof (BUR) and Liquid Applied Roof Covers for use inClass I and Non-combustible Roof Deck Construction,2010 2012 .

FM Approval 4471, Class 1 Panel Roofs, 2010.

ANSI/ FM Approval 4473, Test Standard for Impact Resistance Testing of Rigid Roofing Materials by Impacting with Freezer IceBalls, 2011.

ANSI/ FM Approval 4474, Standard for Evaluating the Simulated Wind Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies Using Static Positiveand/or Negative Differential Pressures,2010 2011 .

FM Approval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials, or Coatings, andExterior Wall Systems, 2010 2015 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Update FM Global References.

Editorial correction.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.


37 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


38 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


2.3.23 IAPMO Publications.

International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, 4755 E. Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA 91761.

UMC, Uniform Mechanical Code,2012 2015 .

UPC, Uniform Plumbing Code,2012 2015 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates IAPMO referenced publications.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris


39 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


40 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


2.3.32 SJI Publications.

Steel Joist Institute, 234 W. Cheves Street, Florence, SC 29501.

SJI CJ SJI-200 , Standard Specifications for Composite Steel Joist, CJ-Series, 2015 2016 .

SJI-100, Standard Specification for K-Series, LH-Series, and DLH-Series Open Web Steel Joists and for Joist Girders, 2015.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This comment corrects the title of SJI-100 to reflect the published document. Additionally, it updates the new title and editionyear for the composite joist standard to SJI-200, 2016. Modifications in the 2015 edition of SJI-200 compared to previouslyadopted version include the following:

• Rewriting the welding (shop, assembly) section to follow AWS D1.1, D1.3 with Section 6.8 Acceptance Criteria

• Updating K factors for web and bottom chord

• Requiring Q for all crimped angles at first bottom chord panel point

• Adding erection stability equations

• Adding single, rotated, uncrimped angle equations

• Adding modified slenderness ratio check

• Updating joint eccentricity section

• Updating reference list

• Clarifying the composite slab height variable, “a” vs. “A”

• Removing a statement regarding ignoring the top chord compositely

• Fixing a circular logic issue with the moment equation

• Clarifying the minimum 50% composite action

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


41 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


42 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 4019-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 2.3.34 ]

2.3.34 SFPE Publications.

SFPE, 9711 Washingtonian Blvd., Suite 380, Gaithersburg, MD 20878. www.sfpe.org

SFPE S.01, The SFPE Engineering Standard on Calculating Fire Exposures to Structures , 2011.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Add reference to SFPE S.01.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.


43 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


44 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


2.3.38 UL Publications.


UL 9, Standard for Fire Tests of Window Assemblies, 2015.

UL 10B, Standard for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2008, revised 2015.

UL 10C, Standard for Positive Pressure Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2015.

UL 217, Standard for Single and Multiple Station Smoke Alarms, 2006, revised 2012 2015 .

UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials,2003 2011 , revised 2014 2015 .

UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units,1999, revised 2014 2013 .

UL 300, Standard for Fire Testing of Fire Extinguishing Systems for Protection of Commercial Cooking Equipment,

UL 300A, Extinguishing System Units for Residential Range Top Cooking Surfaces ,

UL 305, Standard for Safety Panic Hardware, 2014.

UL 555, Standard for Fire Dampers, 2006, revised 2014 2013 .

UL 555C, Standard for Ceiling Dampers,2006, revised 2014.

UL 555S, Standard for Smoke Dampers, 1999, revised 2014.

UL 580, Standard for Tests for Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies, 2006, revised 2013.

UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2008, revised 2013.

UL 790, Standard for Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Roof Coverings, 2004, revised 2014.

UL 924, Standard for Emergency Lighting and Power Equipment,2006, revised 2014 2016 .

UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction,2009 1996 , revised 2013 2012 .

UL 1256, Standard for Fire Test of Roof Deck Constructions,2002, revised 2013.

UL 1286, Standard for Office Furnishings, 2008, revised 2014.

UL 1479, Standard for Fire Tests of Penetration Firestops, 2015.

UL 1715, Standard for Fire Test of Interior Finish Material, 1997, revised 2013.

UL 1897, Standard for Uplift Tests for Roof Covering Systems,2012 2015 .

UL 1975, Standard for Fire Tests for Foamed Plastics Used for Decorative Purposes, 2006.

UL 1994, Standard for Luminous Egress Path Marking Systems,2004, revised 2015.

UL 2079, Standard for Tests for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems ,

UL 2218, Standard for Impact Resistance of Prepared Roof Covering Materials, 2010, revised 2012 .

UL 2390, Standard for Tests for Wind Resistant Asphalt Shingles with Sealed Tabs, 2003, revised 2009.

CAN/ULC S102.2, Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Flooring, Floor Coverings and MiscellaneousMaterials and Assemblies, 2010.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates UL referenced publications.

Response Message:

Ballot Results



45 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


46 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


2.3.39 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Publishing Office, 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20402.

CPSC, 16 CFR 1201, Safety Standard for Architectural Glazing Materials, 1977.

CPSC, 16 CFR 1209, Interim Safety Standard for Cellulose Insulation, 1979.

CPSC, 16 CFR 1404, Cellulose Insulation, 1979.

Federal Specification UUB-790a, Specification for Building Paper, Vegetable Fiber: Kraft, Waterproofed, Water Repellent, and FiberResistant, 1992.

FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings , 2000. (Superceded by ASCE 41)

Title 18, United States Code, Chapter 40, “Importation, Manufacture, Distribution and Storage of Explosive Materials.”

Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 35 and Part 36, Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).

Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1192.

USDOC U.S. Department of Commerce Voluntary Product Standard PS 1, Structural Plywood, 2009.

USDOC U.S. Department of Commerce Voluntary Product Standard PS 2, Performance Standard for Wood-based Structural-UsePanels,2004 2010 .

USDOC U.S. Department of Commerce Voluntary Product Standard PS 20, American Softwood Lumber Standard, 2010.

U.S. Department of Justice, 2010 ADA Standards, September 15, 2010.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates address and referenced publication.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.


47 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


48 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


3.3.33* Animal Housing Facility.

Area of a building or structure, including interior and adjacent exterior spaces, where animals are fed, rested, worked, exercised,treated, exhibited, or used for production. [150,2015 2016 ] (BLD-FUN)



5000_SR-4011_Attachment.docx New A.3.3.33 Animal Housing Facilitiy




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

NOTE: This Public Comment appear as Correlating Note No. 1 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directsthe TC on Fundamentals (FUN) to review the definition of Animal Housing Facility in new

3.3.33 and consider adding Annex language as follows: A.3.3.33 Animal Housing Facility

Animal housing facilities, as used in this Code, are subject to local, state, or federal licensing or permitting requirements,and include –but are not limited to –the following:

(1) Barns and stables

(2) Kennels

(3) Racetrack stable/kennel areas including those stable/kennel areas, barns, and associated buildings at state, county, andlocal fairgrounds

(4) Animal shelters

(5) Animal hospitals and veterinary facilities

(6) Zoos and special amusement parks

(7) Laboratories

(8) Agricultural facilities

(9) Mercantile or business occupancies with animals

Language is consistent with Annex language added to definition in NFPA 101. This action will be considered as a publiccomment.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters


49 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


50 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.3.3.33 Animal Housing Facility.

Animal housing facilities, as used in this Code, are subject to local, state, or federal licensing or

permitting requirements, and include – but are not limited to – the following:

(1) Barns and stables

(2) Kennels

(3) Racetrack stable/kennel areas including those stable/kennel areas, barns, and associated

buildings at state, county, and local fairgrounds

(4) Animal shelters

(5) Animal hospitals and veterinary facilities

(6) Zoos and special amusement parks

(7) Laboratories

(8) Agricultural facilities

(9) Mercantile or business occupancies with animals

of 391

Second Revision No. 6510-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.68.12 ]

3.3.68.12* Mall Structure.

A single building structure enclosing a number of tenants and occupancies wherein two or more tenants or tenant buildings have amain entrance into one or more malls mall concourses . For the purpose of this Code, anchor buildings shall should not beconsidered as a part of the mall structure. (BLD-MER)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Aug 03 10:23:42 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In response to the Correlating Committee via Public Comment No.4, the definition is being revised for consistency withdefinitions in NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.



51 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Rice, Sarah A.

The use of non-mandatory language in the body of a document that is intended to be adopted as law is inappropriate. By adding the word"should" only begs the question of when then is an anchor building part of a mall structure. If it is the intent to give guidance on how todifferentiate between a very large tenant space in a mall structure and an anchor building, just inserting the word "should" does notaccomplish this.


52 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


3.3.152 Delayed Action Closer.

Self Mechanical self -closing device that incorporates a an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing. Delayed action closersare mechanical devices with an adjustable delay. (BLD-MEA)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 11:45:33 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The SR incorporates the revision requested by the CC via PC-5.

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 3.3.150]

Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Jackson, Waymon


53 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


54 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


3.3.397 Mall Concourse.

A roofed or covered common pedestrian area within a mall structure that serves as access for two or more tenants and does notexceed three levels that are open to each other. (BLD-MER)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In response to the Correlating Committee via Public Comment No. 4, the definition of mall concourse is revised to beconsistent with the definition used in NFPA 101.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


55 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


56 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


3.3.682.1* Public Way.

A street, alley, or other similar parcel of land essentially open to the outside air deeded, dedicated, or otherwise permanentlyappropriated to the public for public use and having a clear width and height of not less than 10 ft (3050 mm). (BLD-MEA)



SR6002_Attachment.docx New A.3.3.682.1




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The SR clarifies the intent of the public way via new A.3.3.682.1.

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 71-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 3.3.682.1]

Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.


57 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Jackson, Waymon

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


58 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.3.3.682.1 Public Way. The intent of the definition of ‘public way’ is to establish an end-point at which the means of egress terminates, not under the jurisdiction of the Code and to which the Code’s requirements do not apply. As such, the Code intends a situation where occupants egressing from a building ultimately reach a point where they can move away from the building unimpeded and no longer need the protections of the Code.

of 391


4.4.1* Multiple Safeguards.

The design of every building or structure intended for human occupancy shall be such that reliance for property protection and safetyto life does not depend solely on any single safeguard. An additional safeguard(s) shall be provided for property protection and lifesafety in case any single safeguard is ineffective due to inappropriate human actions, building failure, or system failure renderedineffective .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This comment eliminates the laundry list and subjectivity of the term “inappropriate.” The redundancy of safeguards isdesirable in case one fails. The Manual of Style Table 2.2.2.3 lists possible unenforceable and vague terms, which includesthe term “appropriate” and thus “inappropriate.”

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.


59 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


60 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


7.1.4.2.3

An alternate approach for a material to be considered a limited combustible material is where the material is tested in accordancewith ASTM E2965, Standard Test for Determination of Low Levels of Heat Release Rate for Materials and Products Using an

Oxygen Combustion Calorimeter , at an incident heat flux of 75 kW/m 2 for a 20-minute exposure, the peak heat release rate

does not exceed 150 kW/m 2 for longer than 10 seconds, and the total heat released does not exceed 8 MJ/m 2 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jun 20 15:21:00 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The committee agrees with the substantiation provided in PC 60.

Note to BLD-AAC:

Add ASTM E2965, Standard Test for Determination of Low Levels of Heat Release Rate for Materials and Products Usingan Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter, 2016, into chapter 2 on referenced ASTM standards

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

26 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Ferro, Paul

Heiza, Khaled

Affirmative All


Chrisman, Mark

Collins, David S.

Davis, Richard J.

Day, Richard L.

Dopart, Alan J.


Frable, David W.


61 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Francis, Sam W.

Gaut, James W.

Grant, Kurtis

Hall, William J.

Hanson, Robert E.

Holland, Joseph T.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McElvaney, Joe

McKeon, Thomas W.

Molina, Renato R.

Schiffer, Brad

Schmeida, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.

Woods, Luke C.


Johnson, Aaron

as stated in committee statement.


62 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


7.2.5 Type IV (2HH) Construction.

7.2.5.1 Type IV Construction.

Type IV (2HH) construction shall be that type in which fire walls, exterior walls, and interior bearing walls and structural elements thatare portions of such walls are of approved noncombustible or limited-combustible materials, except as allowed for exterior walls in7.2.5.6.7. Other interior structural elements, arches, floors, and roofs shall be of solid or laminated wood or cross-laminated timberwithout concealed spaces and shall comply with the allowable dimensions of 7.2.5.5 .

7.2.5.1.1

Other interior structural elements, arches, floors, and roofs shall be of solid or laminated wood or cross-laminated timber withoutconcealed spaces and shall comply or with the allowable dimensions of concealed spaces conforming to 7.2.5.6.7.

7.2.5.1.2

Other interior structural elements, arches, floors, and roofs shall comply with the allowable dimensions of 7.2.5.5 .

7.2.5.2 Exterior Wall Separation.

Exterior walls greater than 30 ft (9.1 m) from the property line shall be permitted to be of heavy timber construction, provided that the2-hour rating as required by Table 7.2.1.1 is maintained and such walls contain no combustible concealed spaces.

7.2.5.3 Interior Columns, Arches, Beams, Girders, and Trusses.

Interior columns, arches, beams, girders, and trusses of approved materials other than wood shall be permitted, provided that theyare protected to provide a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour.

7.2.5.4 Concealed Space Spaces .

Certain concealed spaces shall be permitted in accordance with 7.2.5.5.3.4 the following:

(1) Concealed spaces in accordance with 7.2.5.5.5.4 .

(2) Concealed spaces within 1-hour fire resistance–rated interior walls and partitions in accordance with 7.2.5.6.3 that do notrequire additional protection.

(3) Concealed spaces in floors, roofs, or walls of cross-laminated timber construction in accordance with one or more of thefollowing and which do not contain combustibles other than building elements and electrical, mechanical, fire protection, orplumbing materials and equipment:

(a) The building is sprinklered throughout and automatic sprinklers are also provided in the concealed space.

(b) The concealed space is filled completely with noncombustible insulation.

(c) Surfaces within the concealed space are fully sheathed with not less than 1 ⁄2 in. (13 mm) gypsum board ornoncombustible materials.

7.2.5.5 Type IV (2HH) Allowable Dimensions.

All dimensions in 7.2.5.5 for solid sawn members shall be considered nominal.

7.2.5.5.1

The net finished dimensions of glued-laminated members shall be equivalent to the nominal dimensions of solid sawn timbers.

7.2.5.5.2

Cross-laminated timber dimensions shall be actual dimensions.

7.2.5.5.3 Columns.

7.2.5.5.3.1

Wood columns supporting floor loads shall be not less than 8 in. (205 mm) in any dimension.

7.2.5.5.3.2

Wood columns supporting only roof loads shall be not less than 6 in. (150 mm) in width and not less than 8 in. (205 mm) in depth.

7.2.5.5.4 Beams.

7.2.5.5.4.1

Wood beams and girders supporting floor loads shall be not less than 6 in. (150 mm) in width and not less than 10 in. (255 mm) indepth.

7.2.5.5.4.2

Wood beams and girders and other roof framing supporting roof loads only shall be not less than 4 in. (100 mm) in width and notless than 6 in. (150 mm) in depth.

7.2.5.5.5 Arches.


63 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

7.2.5.5.5.1

Framed or glued laminated arches that spring from the finished ground level or the floor line, and timber trusses that support floorloads, shall be not less than 8 in. (205 mm) in width or depth.

7.2.5.5.5.2

Framed or glued laminated arches for roof construction that spring from the finished ground level or the floor line and do not supportfloor loads shall have members not less than 6 in. (150 mm) in width and not less than 8 in. (205 mm) in depth for the lower half ofthe member height, and not less than 6 in. (150 mm) in depth for the upper half of the member height.

7.2.5.5.5.3

Framed or glued laminated arches for roof construction that spring from the top of walls or wall abutments, and timber trusses thatdo not support floor loads, shall have members not less than 4 in. (100 mm) in width and not less than 6 in. (150 mm) in depth.

7.2.5.5.5.4

Spaced members shall be permitted to be composed of two or more pieces not less than 3 in. (75 mm) in thickness where blockedsolidly throughout their intervening spaces or where such spaces are tightly closed by a continuous wood cover plate not less than 2in. (51 mm) in thickness that is secured to the underside of the members.

7.2.5.5.6 Splice Plates.

Splice plates shall be not less than 3 in. (75 mm) in thickness.

7.2.5.5.7 Floors.

Floors shall be constructed without concealed spaces, except as provided in 7.2.5.5.7(2) and shall be permitted to be any of thefollowing materials:

(1) Materials shall be spline or tongue-and-groove plank not less than 3 in. (75 mm) in thickness that is covered with 1 in. (25 mm)tongue-and-groove flooring, laid crosswise or diagonally to the plank, or with 1⁄2 in. (13 mm) wood structural panel; or they shallbe constructed of laminated planks not less than 4 in. (100 mm) in width, set close together on edge, spiked at intervals of 18 in.(455 mm), and covered with 1 in. (25 mm) tongue-and-groove flooring, laid crosswise or diagonally to the plank, or with 1⁄2 in.(13 mm) wood structural panel.

(2) Cross-laminated timber complying with 45.5.8 45.5.7 shall be not less than 4 in. (102 cm) thick, and shall be continuousbetween supports. Individual timbers shall be fastened to one another. Cross-laminated timbers , and shall be permitted to beconnected to walls without shrinkage gaps provided dimensional changes are considered in design; individual timbers shall befastened to one another. Concealed spaces shall be permitted in accordance with 7.2.5.4 .

7.2.5.5.8 Roof Decks.

Roof decks shall be permitted to be constructed of any of the following materials:

(1) Spline or tongue-and-groove plank not less than 2 in. (51 mm) in thickness

(2) Laminated planks not less than 3 in. (75 mm) in width, set close together on edge, and laid as required for floors

(3) 1 1⁄8 in. (29 mm) thick interior wood structural panel, ( exterior glue)

(4) Cross-laminated timber

(5) Approved noncombustible or limited-combustible materials of equivalent fire durability

7.2.5.6 Special Requirements — Type IV Construction.

The special requirements in 7.2.5.6.1 through 7.2.5.6.8 shall apply to Type IV construction.

7.2.5.6.1 Structural Elements.

Structural elements shall be of heavy timber members (e.g., sawn or glued-laminated), cross-laminated timber, or fireresistance–rated construction as set forth in Table 7.2.1.1 when materials other than heavy timber or cross-laminated timber areused.

7.2.5.6.2 Columns, Arches, Beams, and Roof Decking.

Where horizontal separation of 20 ft (6100 mm) or more is provided, wood columns, arches, beams, and roof decking conforming tothe requirements for heavy timber in 7.2.5.5 shall be permitted to be used on the exterior of the building.

7.2.5.6.3 Partitions.

Permanent partitions shall be permitted to be of solid wood construction formed by not less than two layers of matched boards of 1in. (25 mm) nominal thickness or of 1-hour fire resistance–rated construction as set forth in Table 7.2.1.1.

7.2.5.6.4 Floors.

Floors shall be permitted to be of heavy timber, masonry, concrete, wood, or steel and shall be constructed as required in Chapter 8.

7.2.5.6.5 Roofs.

Roofs of 1-hour fire resistance–rated construction shall be permitted.

7.2.5.6.6 Stairways.

7.2.5.6.6.1

Stairways shall be permitted to be constructed with wood treads and risers of not less than 2 in. (51 mm) nominal thickness.


64 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

7.2.5.6.6.2

Where built-on, laminated, or plank inclines are required for floors, stairways shall be permitted to be 1 in. (25 mm) nominalthickness or shall be permitted to be constructed as required for buildings of Type I or Type II construction.

7.2.5.6.7 Exterior Walls.

Exterior walls having a required fire resistance rating of 2 hours or less shall be permitted to be constructed with any of the followingmaterials:

(1) Noncombustible material shall be permitted.

(2) Limited-combustible material shall be permitted.

(3) Fire- retardant- treated wood shall be permitted. Approved fire-retardant-treated wood framing shall be permitted within theassembly of exterior walls having a horizontal separation of not less than 60 in. (1525 mm), provided that the fire resistancerating is maintained and the exposed outer and inner faces of such walls are constructed of limited-combustible ornoncombustible materials.

(4) Cross-laminated timber complying with 45.5.7 shall be permitted provided the exterior surface of the cross-laminated timber isprotected by one of the following:

(a) Fire- retardant– - treated wood not less than 15⁄32 in. (12 mm) thick

(b) Gypsum board not less than 1⁄2 in. (12.7 mm) thick

(c) Noncombustible material.

7.2.5.6.8 Exterior Nonbearing Walls.

Exterior nonbearing walls shall be permitted when tested in accordance with, and meeting the conditions of acceptance of, eitherone of the following: NFPA 285 shall be permitted.

NFPA 285

FM Approval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials orCoatings and Exterior Wall Systems



SR_1002.docx Changes included in word file--for staff use




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Recent construction techniques involving the use of heavy timber structural members have been designed and built globally.Many of these designs have exceeded traditional height limits (four-five stories) and have been completed using performancebased design or equivalency processes. The committee input is intended to introduce revised height limits for such structuralmembers. In addition, FPRF released a Phase 1 study on feasibility of tall timber structures in March 2014. This study capturedthe potential benefits, hazards, and concerns with this construction technique. Public comments on this concept areencouraged.

The following substantiation relates to 7.2.5.6.8:

- There is no window opening in FM 4880, thus it does not challenge the opening space between the window space and the wall

- The fire test does not simultaneously expose both sides of the same wall assembly unless it is symmetrical.

- This is not a national consensus standard.

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 7.2.5.6.8]

Ballot Results



65 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

29 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Ferro, Paul

Heiza, Khaled

Affirmative All


Chrisman, Mark

Collins, David S.

Davis, Richard J.

Day, Richard L.

Dopart, Alan J.


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Gaut, James W.

Grant, Kurtis

Hanson, Robert E.

Holland, Joseph T.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

McElvaney, Joe

McKeon, Thomas W.

Molina, Renato R.

Schiffer, Brad

Schmeida, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.

Woods, Luke C.


Hall, William J.

Conflict within language. SR- 1001 states all interior shall be covered with 2 layer gypsum. This language conflicts

Johnson, Aaron

revert to original, current edition.

Lovell, Vickie J.

Fire Safe North America promotes safety layering and a balanced fire protection design regardless of the type of construction. Fire SafeNorth America is voting negative on the topic of Mass Timber in tall building construction because the research is not yet complete. Two majorcode development organizations are studying this topic. We believe it is appropriate to carefully evaluate code change proposals based ontheir findings before we cast an affirmative vote to move it forward in the code process.

Abstention

Koffel, William E.

In accordance with the policy of the Standards Council, I have abstained from voting on this item.


66 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.1.2.3* Wall Marking and Identification.

For other than existing assemblies, where Where there is an accessible concealed floor, floor/ceiling, or attic space, fire walls, firebarriers, smoke barriers, and smoke partitions shall be permanently identified with signs or stenciling in the concealed space andshall comply with all of the following:

(1) Be located in accessible concealed floor, floor/ceiling, or attic spaces

(2) Be located within 15 ft (4572 mm) of the end of each wall and at intervals not exceeding 30 ft (9144 mm) measured horizontallyalong the wall or partition

(3) Include lettering not less than 3 in. (76 mm) in height with a minimum 3⁄8 in. (9.5 mm) stroke in a contrasting color

(4) Identify the wall type and its fire resistive resistance rating as applicable


Submitter Full Name: BLD-FIR


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The committee accepts the direction of the Correlating Committee to revise 8.1.2.3 and delete "For other than existingassemblies…" as well as replace the word "resistive" with the word "resistance" within item (4). NFPA 5000 is applicable tonew construction only.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Goldhammer, Edward S.

Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.

McHugh, Jr., William J.


67 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.

Stashak, Catherine L.


68 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 1003-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 8.4.3.2 ]

8.4.3.3

Where impact protection is added to a fire-protected covering, the impact protection shall not reduce the fire resistance rating.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This comment changes the term degrade to reduce in order to eliminate a term that the TC felt was vague. Note that theterm degrade is used eight times in NFPA 5000.

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 74-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 8.4.3.2]

Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

26 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Ferro, Paul

Heiza, Khaled

Affirmative All


Chrisman, Mark

Collins, David S.

Davis, Richard J.

Day, Richard L.

Dopart, Alan J.


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Gaut, James W.

Grant, Kurtis

Hall, William J.

Hanson, Robert E.

Holland, Joseph T.


69 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McElvaney, Joe

McKeon, Thomas W.

Molina, Renato R.

Schiffer, Brad

Schmeida, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.

Woods, Luke C.


Johnson, Aaron

as stated in committee statement.


70 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.7.1 General.

Every opening in a fire barrier shall be protected to limit the spread of fire and restrict the movement of smoke from one side of thefire barrier to the other.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Fire rated opening protectives are not evaluated for smoke movement during a fire test.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan


71 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



72 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



73 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

8.7.2.2


74 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

The fire protection rating for opening protectives in fire barriers, fire-rated smoke barriers, and fire-rated smoke partitions shall be inaccordance with Table 8.7.2.2.

Opening protectives shall have a minimum fire protection rating as specified in Table 8.7.2.2.

Table 8.7.2.2 Minimum Fire Ratings for Opening Protectives in Fire Resistance–Rated Assemblies and Fire-Rated GlazingMarkings

Component

Wallsand

Partitions(hr)

Fire DoorAssemblies

(hr)

DoorVisionPanel

MaximumSize

(in.2)

Fire-RatedGlazingMarking

DoorVisionPanel

Minimum SideLight/Transom

Assembly Rating (hr)

Fire-Rated GlazingMarking Side

Light/Transom Panel

Minimum

Windows (h

Fireprotection

Fireresistance

Fireprotection

Fireresistance

Fireprotection

Elevatorhoistways 2 11⁄2 155 in.2c

D-H-90 orD-H-W-90 NP 2 NP D-H-W-120 NP

1 1 155 in.2fD-H-60 orD-H-W-60 NP 1 NP D-H-W-60 NP

Elevatorlobby (per7.2.13.4) 1 1 100 in.2c

≤100 in.2,D-H-T-60 orD-H-W-60 NP 1 NP D-H-W-60 NP

>100 in.2,D-H-W-60

Verticalshafts(includingstairways,exits, andrefusechutes) 2 11⁄2

Maximumsize tested


1 1Maximumsize tested


Replacementpanels inexistingverticalshafts 1⁄2 1⁄3

Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20 1⁄3 1⁄3 D-H-20 D-W-20 1⁄3

Fire barriers 3 3

100

in. 2 c

≤100 in. 2 ,D-H-180 orD-H-W-180 NP 3 NP D-H-W-180 NP

>100 in. 2 ,D-H-W-180

2 1 1 ⁄2Maximum

size testedD-H-90 orD-H-W-90 NP 2 NP D-H-W-120 NP

1 3 ⁄4

Maximumsize

tested dD-H-45 orD-H-W-45 3 ⁄4 d 3 ⁄4 d D-H-45 D-H-W-45 3 ⁄4

1 ⁄2 1 ⁄3Maximum

size testedD-20 orD-W-20 1 ⁄3 1 ⁄3 D-H-20 D-W-20 1 ⁄3

Horizontalexits 2 11⁄2

Maximumsize tested


Horizontalexits servedby bridgesbetweenbuildings

2 3⁄4

Maximumsize

testedd

D-H-45 orD-H-W-45

3⁄4d 3⁄4d D-H-45 D-H-W-45 3⁄4

Exit access

corridorse 1 1⁄3Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20

3⁄4 3⁄4 D- H-45 D-H-W-20 45 3⁄4

1⁄2 1⁄3Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20

1⁄3 1⁄3 D-H-20 D-H-W-20 1⁄3

Other firebarriers

3 2 100 in. 2c≤100 in. 2 ,D-H-180 orD-H-W-180

NP 3 NP D-H-W-180 NP

>100 in. 2 ,D-H-W-180


75 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Component

Wallsand

Partitions(hr)

Fire DoorAssemblies

(hr)

DoorVisionPanel

MaximumSize

(in.2)

Fire-RatedGlazingMarking

DoorVisionPanel

Minimum SideLight/Transom

Assembly Rating (hr)

Fire-Rated GlazingMarking Side

Light/Transom Panel

Minimum

Windows (h

Fireprotection

Fireresistance

Fireprotection

Fireresistance

Fireprotection

2 1 1 ⁄2Maximum

size testedD-H-90 orD-H-W-90

NP 2 NP D-H-W-120 NP

1 3 ⁄4

Maximumsize

tested d

D-H-45 orD-H-W-45

3 ⁄4 d 3 ⁄4 d D-H-45 D-H-W-45 D-H-45 3 ⁄4


size testedD-20 orD-W-20

1 ⁄3 1 ⁄3 D-H-20 D-W-20 1 ⁄3

Smoke

barriers e1 1⁄3

Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20

3⁄4 3⁄4 D-H-45 D-H-W-20 45 3⁄4



1 ⁄3 1 ⁄3 D-H-20 D-H-W-20 1 ⁄3

Smokepartitionse,f

1 1 ⁄3Maximum


3 ⁄4 3 ⁄4 D-H-45 D-H-W-45 3 ⁄4

Smokepartitionse,f

1⁄2 1 ⁄2 1 ⁄3Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20

1 ⁄2 1 ⁄3 1 ⁄2 1 ⁄3 D-H-20 D-H-W-20 1 ⁄2 1 ⁄3

For SI Units, 1 in.2 = 0.00064516 m2.

NP: Not permitted.

a Fire resistance–rated glazing tested to NFPA 251 shall be permitted in the maximum size tested (see 8.3.3.7 8.7.7.7 ).

b Fire-rated glazing in exterior windows shall be marked in accordance with Table 8.3.3.12 8.7.7.2 .

c See ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, for additional information.

d Maximum area of individual exposed lights shall be 1296 in.2 (0.84 m2), with no dimension exceeding 54 in. (1.37 m) unlessotherwise tested. [80:Table 4.4.5 Note b and 80:4.4.5.1].

e Fire doors are not required to have a hose stream test per NFPA 252; UL 10B, Standard for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies; or UL10C, Standard for Positive Pressure Fire Tests of Door Assemblies.

f For residential board and care, see 32.2.3.1 and 33.2.3.1.



Table_8.7.2.2_for_Submittal_with_SR.docx For staff use




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Section 8.7.2.2: Per the request of the Correlating Committee, the text of Section 8.7.2.2 was updated for correlation with thetitle of Table 8.7.2.2. The deletion of the second sentence is editorial as it is repetitive.

Table 8.7.2.2: The row for fire barriers within the table is being relocated to the end of the table, before the entry for smokebarriers. This change will help clarify that it addresses fire barriers not otherwise addressed within the table. This changesupports the request of the Correlating Committee as well as the Committee Input developed during the First Draft stage. Thetable also contains a new row for one hour smoke partitions and 1/2 hour smoke barriers. The committee reviewed the ballotcomments addressing any inconsistencies in the table with smoke partitions and smoke barriers and the addition of these entriesfor updates the table to address all rated components throughout the Code. Additional minor changes to the table update errorsand inconsistencies from the First Draft version of the Table.


76 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



77 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.7.3.2

All fire door assemblies shall bear an approved label be labeled .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The change removes any confusion of the word, "approved". The term "labeled" is a defined term in the Code and bydefinition, a label is approved. Language is more consistent with terminology and requirements from NFPA 80.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan


78 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



79 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.7.3.3

The maximum size of the fire doors shall not exceed that specified in NFPA 80 , except as modified by Chapter 11 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Section 8.7.3.1 provides a generic requirement for compliance with NFPA 80 for installation of fire doors. Section 8.7.3.3 isnot needed as the size of fire doors is adequately addressed by NFPA 80.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan


80 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



81 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.7.4.1

Floor fire door assemblies used to protect openings in fire resistance–rated floors shall be tested in the horizontal position inaccordance with NFPA 288 and shall achieve a fire resistance rating not less than the assembly being penetrated.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Change correlates section with equivalent text in NFPA 101. Text is also consistent with language in NFPA 288.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan


82 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



83 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.7.5.2

All fire window assemblies shall bear an approved label be labeled .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The change removes any confusion of the word, "approved". The term "labeled" is a defined term in the Code and bydefinition, a label is approved. Language is more consistent with terminology and requirements from NFPA 80.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan


84 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



85 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.7.7.1

Glazing materials that have been listed and labeled to indicate the type of opening to be protected for fire protection purposes shallbe permitted to be used in approved opening protectives in accordance with their listing and with the maximum sizes tested Table8.7.2.2 and NFPA 80 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Glazing shall be used in installations in accordance with Table 8.7.2.2 and NFPA 80. Change is consistent withlanguage in NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.


86 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



87 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.8.1.2

Penetrations shall be installed protected in accordance with a tested system, and installed and maintained in accordance with themanufacturer’s instructions.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: A penetration needs to be protected, not installed. Change is consistent with NFPA 101 SR-2507.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

17 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan


88 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.


Abstention

Koffel, William E.

In accordance with the policy of the Standards Council, I have abstained from balloting on this item. However, I would recommend that "inaccordance" be deleted after the word "protected."


89 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 3520-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 8.8.2.5.1 ]

8.8.2.5.1

The requirements of 8.8.2 shall not apply where otherwise permitted by any one of the following:

(1)

(2) Where penetrations through floors are enclosed in a shaft enclosure designed as a fire barrier

(3) Where concrete, grout, or mortar has been used to fill the annular spaces around cast-iron, copper, or steel piping, conduit, ortubing, that penetrates one or more concrete or masonry fire resistance–rated assemblies, and all of the following applies:

(a) The nominal diameter of each penetrating item does not exceed 6 in. (150 mm)

(b) The opening size does not exceed 144 in. 2 (92,909 mm 2 ) 1 ft 2 (.09 m 2 )

(c) Thickness of the concrete, grout, or mortar is the full thickness of the assembly

(4) Where penetration is limited to one floor, the firestopping material is capable of preventing the passage of flame and hot gasessufficient to ignite cotton waste when subjected to the time–temperature fire conditions of UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests ofBuilding Construction and Materials, or ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction andMaterials, under a minimum positive pressure differential of 0.01 in. water column (2.5 Pa) at the location of the penetration forthe time period equivalent to the required fire resistance rating of the assembly penetrated, and the firestopping materials areused with the following penetrating items:

(a) Steel, ferrous, or copper cables

(b) Cable or wire with steel jackets

(c) Cast-iron, steel, or copper pipes

(d) Steel conduit or tubing




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The change updates the units to be consistent with what is used in NFPA 101 and units more commonly used in theindustry.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

* Where penetrations are tested and installed as part of an assembly in accordance with UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests ofBuilding Construction and Materials, or ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction andMaterials


90 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



91 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.8.5 Vibration Isolation Isolation Equipment or Systems .

Where designs take transmission of vibrations into consideration, any vibration isolation shall meet one of the following conditions:

It shall be made on either side of the wall or floor.

It shall be designed for the specific purpose.

Where the vibration isolation of equipment or systems is employed, the vibration restraint(s) shall be located outside of the partition,wall, or floor assembly for which the equipment or systems pass through.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

At the 30 July 2015 NFPA FIR meeting the committee had deliberated the various concerns with the Public Input No. 125(NFPA 5000), and how to address the concerns of the proponent and our own concerns.

The proponent to PI-125 requested Section 8.8.5 of NFPA 5000 be deleted without substation, and stated in his reasonstatement the following:

“This provision does not address anything. No purpose seems to be served by this section. It does not appear to limit anythingnor impart meaningful guidance to the provision of vibration isolation.”

The NFPA FIR did not find that there was a compelling need to delete without substitution this provision, and the proponent onlyaddressed one of many sections with the identical content, which led to the NFPA FIR rejecting this proposal. However,discussions during the FIR meeting did reveal that the proponent may have had a point with respect to the current languageused to describe the requirement versus the intent for this provision.

It was felt that the original submitter did have a point. The existing language does not clearly address the focus of this section,that of prohibiting vibration isolation equipment and systems from being installed within partitions, wall or floor assemblies. Theintent is to require that such equipment or systems be installed on either side of the subject partition or assembly. Equipmentand systems can include, but not be limited to, flexible duct connectors, flexible pipe pump connectors, pipe isolators, or flexibleconduit.

This proposal also wishes to modify that work with this proposal under Public Input No. 265 (NFPA 101), and Public Input No.92 (NFPA 5000). The basis for this is that the 2015 proposed language uses the phrase “vibration isolation” which is a globalreferral, versus using the term “restraints” which is what the system represents. Second, it was felt there was no need forsub-item #2 which states “…it shall be designed for the specific purpose…” since that is covered under the manufacture’sliterature and warranty.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


92 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



93 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.9.1 General.

The provisions of Section 8.9 shall govern the materials and methods of construction used to protect joints within or between firewalls, fire barrier walls, floors, and floor/ceiling and roof/ceiling assemblies in accordance with 8.9.2, and at the intersection of theexterior wall and the perimeter of the floor assembly in accordance with 8.9.3.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Section reference update.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan


94 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



95 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.9.4 Exterior Curtain Walls and the Perimeter Joint.

8.9.4.1*

The provisions of 8.9.4 shall be intended to restrict the interior vertical passage of flame and hot gases from one floor to anotherat the location where the floor intersects the inside of an exterior curtain wall assembly.

8.9.4.2

Floor assemblies that are required to be a fire barrier shall extend to, and be tight against, the exterior curtain wall.

8.9.4.3

Where fire resistance–rated floor or floor/ceiling assemblies are required, voids created at the intersection of the exterior curtainwall assemblies and such floor or floor/ceiling assemblies shall be sealed with approved materials.

8.9.4.3.1

The approved materials specified in 8.9.4.3 shall be securely installed in accordance with the approved system.

8.9.4.3.2

The approved materials specified in 8.9.4.3 shall be capable of preventing the passage of flame and hot gases sufficient to ignitecotton waste where subjected to the time–temperature fire conditions of UL 263, Fire Tests of Building Construction andMaterials , and/or ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials , under a minimumpositive pressure differential of 0.01 in. water column (2.5 Pa) for a time period at least equal to the fire resistance rating of thefloor assembly, or when tested in accordance with ASTM E2307, Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance ofPerimeter Fire Barrier Systems Using Intermediate-Scale, Multi-Story Test Apparatus , and having an F rating equal to the fireresistance rating of the floor assembly.

8.9.4.3.3

Where the fire resistance rating of the floor assembly is less than the time period determined in accordance with 8.9.4.3.2 , thetime period shall be permitted to be not less than the fire resistance rating of the floor assembly.

8.9.4.4

Height and fire resistance requirements for curtain wall spandrels shall comply with 37.1.4 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This section was inadvertently duplicated during the First Revision stage. Section 8.9.3 should remain and Section 8.9.4is a duplicate and should be deleted.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned


96 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



97 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.10.3.6

Shutters that protect openings shall be automatic- closing upon detection operation of approved smoke by smoke detectorsinstalled in such a way as to detect smoke on either side of the opening in accordance with the provisions of NFPA 72.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revised language addresses the request of the Correlating Committee to revise text to capture what the smokedetector installation is to accomplish. The additional text was added for consistency with 11.2.1.9.2(4).

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard


98 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



99 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.10.4.3 Vibration Isolation Equipment or Systems.

Where designs take transmissions of vibration into consideration, any vibration isolation shall meet one of the following conditions:

It shall be made on either side of the smoke partitions.

It shall be designed for the specific purpose.

Where the vibration isolation of equipment or systems is employed, the vibration restraint(s) shall be located outside of the partition,wall, or floor assembly for which the equipment or systems pass through.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

At the 30 July 2015 NFPA FIR meeting the committee had deliberated the various concerns with the Public Input No. 125(NFPA 5000), and how to address the concerns of the proponent and our own concerns.

The proponent to PI-125 requested Section 8.8.5 of NFPA 5000 be deleted without substation, and stated in his reasonstatement the following:

“This provision does not address anything. No purpose seems to be served by this section. It does not appear to limit anythingnor impart meaningful guidance to the provision of vibration isolation.”

The NFPA FIR did not find that there was a compelling need to delete without substitution this provision, and the proponent onlyaddressed one of many sections with the identical content, which led to the NFPA FIR rejecting this proposal. However,discussions during the FIR meeting did reveal that the proponent may have had a point with respect to the current languageused to describe the requirement versus the intent for this provision.

It was felt that the original submitter did have a point. The existing language does not clearly address the focus of this section,that of prohibiting vibration isolation equipment and systems from being installed within partitions, wall or floor assemblies. Theintent is to require that such equipment or systems be installed on either side of the subject partition or assembly. Equipmentand systems can include, but not be limited to, flexible duct connectors, flexible pipe pump connectors, pipe isolators, or flexibleconduit.

This proposal also wishes to modify that work with this proposal under Public Input No. 265 (NFPA 101), and Public Input No.92 (NFPA 5000). The basis for this is that the 2015 proposed language uses the phrase “vibration isolation” which is a globalreferral, versus using the term “restraints” which is what the system represents. Second, it was felt there was no need forsub-item #2 which states “…it shall be designed for the specific purpose…” since that is covered under the manufacture’sliterature and warranty.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


100 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



101 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.11.5.2

Penetrations Through-penetrations for cables, cable trays, conduits, pipes, tubes, vents, wires, and similar items to accommodateelectrical, mechanical, plumbing, and communications systems that pass through a wall, floor, or floor/ceiling assembly constructedas a smoke barrier, or through the ceiling membrane of the roof/ceiling of a smoke barrier, shall be protected by a listed systemtested in accordance with the requirements of UL 1479, Standard for Fire Tests of Penetration Firestops , for air leakage. The airleakage rate of the penetration assemblies, measured at 0.30 in. (7.47 Pa) of water in both the ambient temperature and elevatedtemperature tests, shall not exceed: and shall comply with one of the following:

5 ft 3 /m per ft 2 (0.025 m 3 /s per m 2 ) of penetration opening for each through-penetration firestop system

A total cumulative leakage of 50 ft 3 /m (0.024 m 3 /s) for any 100 ft 2 (9.3 m 2 ) of wall area or floor area

(1) A maximum 5 ft 3 min per ft 2 (0.025 m 3 /s per m 2 ) of penetration opening for each through-penetration firestop system

(2) A maximum total cumulative leakage of 50 ft 3 min (0.024 m 3 /s) for any 100 ft 2 (9.3 m 2 ) of wall area or floor area




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The addition of the word 'through' clarifies the application of the section and addresses the request of the CorrelatingCommittee to consider the negative ballot comment. The deleted text regarding the L rating is redundant as it is included in theANSI/UL 1479 test. The repeated language is not needed here. The addition of the term 'maximum' to (1) and (2) clarify theallowable leakage per system and area.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

17 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


102 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.


Abstention

Koffel, William E.

In accordance with the policy of the Standards Council, I have abstained from voting on this item.


103 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.11.5.5

Where the penetration penetrating item uses a sleeve to penetrate the smoke barrier, the sleeve shall be securely set in the smokebarrier, and the space between the item and the sleeve shall be filled with a listed system or a material capable of restricting thetransfer of smoke in accordance with 8.11.5.2.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In response to the Correlating Committee, the term "penetration" was changed to "penetrating." No additional changes wereneeded. The last sentence of the requirement is correct. Changes were made to the similar section in NFPA 101 so thelanguage reads the same in both documents.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard


104 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



105 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.11.7.2

Joints made within, between, or at the perimeter of smoke barriers shall be protected with a listed joint system that is tested inaccordance with the requirements of UL 2079, Tests for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems, for air leakage. The and the L

rating of the joint system shall not exceed 5 ft3/m min per ft (0.00775 m3/s per m) of the joint at 0.30 in. (7.47 Pa) of water for boththe ambient temperature and elevated temperature tests .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The deleted text regarding the L rating is redundant as it is included in the ANSI/UL 2079 test. The repeated language isnot needed here. The change is consistent with changes made to Section 8.11.5.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.


106 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



107 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.11.7.3

Joints made within or between smoke barriers shall be protected with a listed joint system or a material that is capable ofrestricting the transfer of smoke in accordance with 8.11.7.2 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In response to item (3) in Public Comment 14 (CC Note 12), Section 8.11.7.3 is being deleted. The text is not necessarywith the new text of Section 8.11.7.2. Equivalent text was deleted in NFPA 101 during the First Draft.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.


108 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



109 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


8.14.1.3

Draftstopping materials shall be not less than 1⁄2 in. (13 mm) thick type X gypsum board, 15 ⁄32 in. (12 mm) thick wood structuralpanel, or other approved materials that are adequately supported.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Per the request of the Correlating Committee, the negative ballot comments were considered. This change reverts back to2015 edition text in response to the ballot comments. The purpose of draftstopping is not to stop the spread of fire, but to inhibitairflow and air movement. The change made at the First Draft stage eliminated the allowance for material such as 1/2" plywoodand 15/32" structural panel to be used to satisfy the draftstopping provisions without appropriate technical justification as to whythe material is not satisfactory. The 2015 text is adequate.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.



110 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



111 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.2.3.2 Acceptance Criteria for NFPA 286.

The interior finish shall comply with the following:

(1) During the 40 kW exposure, flames shall not spread to the ceiling.

(2) The flame shall not spread to the outer extremity of the sample on any wall or ceiling.

(3) Flashover, as defined described in NFPA 286, shall not occur.

(4) The peak heat release rate throughout the test shall not exceed 800 kW.

(5) The total smoke released throughout the test shall not exceed 10,764 ft2 (1000 m2).


Submitter Full Name: BLD-INT


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: NFPA 286 does not define the term flashover. This change is in response to CC Note 15.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.

Penaloza, C. Anthony

Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.

Long, Jr., Richard T.


112 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

McKeon, Thomas W.

Pancake, III, William A.

Paszczuk, Henry


Richardson, James R.

Tyree, David P.


113 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.2.4.9 Polypropylene (PP) and High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE). Solid Thermoplastics.

10.2.4.9.1

Polypropylene and Solid thermoplastics, including but not limited to polypropylene, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), solidpolycarbonate, solid polystyrene, and solid acrylic materials that melt and drip when exposed to flame, shall not be permitted asinterior wall or ceiling finish unless the material complies with the requirements of 10.2.3.1.

10.2.4.9.2

The tests shall be performed on a finished assembly and on the maximum thickness intended for use.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Solid thermoplastics are known to melt and drip when exposed from underneath as they would be in ASTM E84 test,resulting in test results that are not indicative of actual fire performance. In that respect, other solid thermoplastics behave likepolyethylene and polypropylene. This is in response to CI No. 5504.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


114 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry



Tyree, David P.


115 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.2.4.12.2

Such painted panels shall be permitted for use in areas where Class A interior finishes are required. The total paint thickness shallnot exceed 1 ⁄28 in. (0.9 mm).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Coordination between 101 and 5000. New text is already in NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry



116 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Tyree, David P.


117 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.2.4.13.2

If the materials are tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of BuildingMaterials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, specimen preparation andmounting shall be in accordance with ASTM E2579, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Wood Productsto Assess Surface Burning Characteristics , using the product-mounting system ( , including adhesive) , of actual use.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Added title of ASTM E2579 per CC Note No. 15 / PC 16.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry


118 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



Tyree, David P.


119 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.2.4.15.1

Light-transmitting plastics used as interior wall and ceiling finish shall be permitted based on large-scale fire tests per10.2.4.3.3.1 that which substantiate the combustibility characteristics of the plastics for the use intended under actual fireconditions.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Coordination with NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry



120 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Tyree, David P.


121 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.2.5.1 General.

Interior wall and ceiling trim and incidental finish, other than wall base in accordance with 10.2.5.2 and bulletin boards, posters, andposters paper in accordance with 10.2.5.3, not in excess of 10 percent of the specific wall and ceiling areas of any room or space towhich it is applied shall be permitted to be Class C materials in occupancies where interior wall and ceiling finish of Class A or ClassB is required.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:

Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry


122 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



Tyree, David P.


123 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.2.5.3 Bulletin Boards, Posters, and Posters Paper .

10.2.5.3.1

Bulletin boards, posters, and posters paper attached directly to the wall shall not exceed 20 percent of the aggregate wall area towhich they are applied.

10.2.5.3.2

The provision of 10.2.5.3.1 shall not apply to artwork and teaching materials in sprinklered educational or day-care occupancies inaccordance with 17.5.5.3, 18.5.5, or 18.6.5.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:

Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


124 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Paszczuk, Henry



Tyree, David P.


125 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 4503-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 10.3 ]

10.3 Use of Interior Finishes.

10.3.1

Requirements for interior wall and ceiling finish shall apply as follows:

Where specified elsewhere in this Code for specific occupancies as noted in Chapter 11 and Chapters 15 through 31and 33 through 34

As specified in Section 10.5

10.3.2* Use of Interior Finishes.

10.3.2.1

Requirements for interior wall and ceiling finish shall apply as follows:

Where specified elsewhere in this Code for specific occupancies as noted in Chapter 11 and Chapters 15 through 31and 33 through 34

As specified in Section 10.4 through 10.6

10.3.2.2*

Interior floor finish shall comply with Section 10.7 under any of the following conditions:

Where floor finish requirements are specified elsewhere in this Code

Where the fire performance of the floor finish cannot be demonstrated to be equivalent to floor finishes with a critical radiant

flux of at least 0.1 W/cm 2




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This section needs to be deleted as it has been replaced by text in section 10.2.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew


126 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry



Tyree, David P.


127 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.4 Interior Wall or Ceiling Finish Testing and Classification.

10.4.1*

Interior wall or ceiling finish that is required elsewhere in this Code to be Class A, Class B, or Class C shall be classified basedon test results from ASTM E84, Standard Test Method of Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials , or UL 723,Standard for Test of Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials , or except as indicated in 10.4.1.1 or 10.4.1.2 .

10.4.1.1

Exposed portions of structural members complying with the requirements for Type IV(2HH) construction in accordance with 7.2.5of this Code shall be exempt from the testing and classification provisions of ASTM E84 or UL 723.

10.4.1.2

Interior wall and ceiling finish tested in accordance with NFPA 286 , and meeting the conditions of 10.4.5.2 , shall be permitted tobe used where a Class A classification in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723 is required.

10.4.1.3*

Fire-retardant coatings shall not be used to obtain compliance with the interior finish requirements of this Code .

10.4.1.4*

Surfaces of walls, partitions, columns, and ceilings shall be permitted to be finished with factory-applied fire-retardant-coatedproducts that have been listed and labeled to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of ASTM E2768, Standard TestMethod for Extended Duration Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials , on the coated surface.

10.4.2*

Products required to be tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723 shall be grouped in the classes described in 10.4.2.1through 10.4.2.3 in accordance with their flame spread index and smoke developed index, except as indicated in 10.4.1.2 .

10.4.2.1 Class A Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish.

Class A interior wall and ceiling finishes shall be those finishes with a flame spread index of 0–25 and a smoke developed index of0–450 and shall include any material classified at 25 or less on the flame spread index test scale and 450 or less on the smokedeveloped index test scale.

10.4.2.2 Class B Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish.

Class B interior wall and ceiling finishes shall be those finishes with a flame spread index of 26–75 and a smoke developed indexof 0–450 and shall include any material classified at more than 25 but not more than 75 on the flame spread index test scale and450 or less on the smoke developed index test scale.

10.4.2.3 Class C Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish.

Class C interior wall and ceiling finishes shall be those finishes with a flame spread index of 76–200 and a smoke developed indexof 0–450 and shall include any material classified at more than 75 but not more than 200 on the flame spread index test scale and450 or less on the smoke developed index test scale.

10.4.3

The classification of interior finish specified in 10.4.2 shall be that of the basic material used by itself or in combination with othermaterials.

10.4.4

Wherever the use of Class C interior wall and ceiling finish is required, Class A or Class B shall be permitted. Where Class Binterior wall and ceiling finish is required, Class A shall be permitted.

10.4.5*

Products tested in accordance with NFPA 265 , shall comply with the criteria of 10.4.5.1 . Products tested in accordance withNFPA 286 shall comply with the criteria of 10.4.5.2 .

10.4.5.1*

The interior finish shall comply with the following when tested using the Method B test protocol of NFPA 265 :

During the 40 kW exposure, flames shall not spread to the ceiling.

The flame shall not spread to the outer extremities of the samples on the 8 ft by 12 ft (2440 mm by 3660 mm) walls.

Flashover, as described in NFPA 265 , shall not occur.

The total smoke released throughout the test shall not exceed 1000 m 2 .


128 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

10.4.5.2

The interior finish shall comply with all of the following when tested using the test protocol of NFPA 286 :

During the 40 kW exposure, flames shall not spread to the ceiling.

The flame shall not spread to the outer extremity of the sample on any wall or ceiling.

Flashover, as described in NFPA 286 , shall not occur.

The peak heat release rate throughout the test shall not exceed 800 kW.

The total smoke released throughout the test shall not exceed 10,764 ft 2 (1000 m 2 ).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This section needs to be deleted as it is repetitive of text that has been revised and is contained in section 10.2.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.



129 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Paszczuk, Henry



Tyree, David P.


130 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.5* Specific Materials.

10.5.1* Textile Wall and Textile Ceiling Materials.

The use of textile materials on walls or ceilings shall comply with one of the following conditions:

Textile materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method forSurface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning, using thespecimen preparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting ofTextile, Paper or Polymeric (including Vinyl) Wall or Ceiling Coverings, and of Facings and Wood Veneers Intended to beApplied on Site Over a Wood Substrate, to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics, (see 10.4.2 ) , shall be permitted onthe walls or ceilings of rooms or areas protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system.

Textile materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using thespecimen preparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 (see 10.3.2 ) , shall be permitted on partitions that do notexceed three-quarters of the floor-to-ceiling height, or do not exceed 8 ft (2440 mm) in height, whichever is less.

Textile materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using thespecimen preparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 ( see 10.3.2 ), shall be permitted to extend not more than 48in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor on ceiling-height walls and ceiling-height partitions.

Textile materials shall be permitted on walls and partitions where tested in accordance with NFPA 265 . ( See 10.3.5.)

Textile materials shall be permitted on walls, partitions, and ceilings where tested in accordance with NFPA 286 . (See10.3.5.)

10.5.2* Expanded Vinyl Wall and Ceiling Coverings.

The use of expanded vinyl wall or ceiling coverings shall comply with one of the following conditions:

Materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using the specimenpreparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 ( see 10.4.2 ), shall be permitted on the walls or ceilings of rooms orareas protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system.

Materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using the specimenpreparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 ( see 10.3.2 ), shall be permitted on partitions that do not exceed three-quarters of the floor-to-ceiling height, or do not exceed 8 ft (2440 mm) in height, whichever is less.

Materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using the specimenpreparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 ( see 10.3.2 ), shall be permitted to extend not more than 48 in. (1220mm) above the finished floor on ceiling-height walls and ceiling-height partitions.

Materials shall be permitted on walls and partitions where tested in accordance with NFPA 265 . ( See 10.3.6 .)

Materials shall be permitted on walls, partitions, and ceilings where tested in accordance with NFPA 286 . ( See 10.3.5 .)

10.5.3 Cellular or Foamed Plastic.

Cellular or foamed plastic materials shall not be used as interior wall and ceiling finish, unless specifically permitted by 10.5.3.1or 10.5.3.2 . This subsection shall apply to both exposed foamed plastics and to foamed plastics used in conjunction with a textileor vinyl facing or cover.

10.5.3.1

Cellular or foamed plastic materials meeting the definition of foamed plastic insulation shall be permitted where subjected tolarge-scale fire tests that substantiate the combustibility and smoke release characteristics of the material for the use intendedunder actual fire conditions.

10.5.3.1.1

One of the following fire tests shall be used for assessing the combustibility of cellular or foamed plastic materials as interior finish:

NFPA 286 , with the acceptance criteria of 10.4.5.2

UL 1715, Standard for Fire Test of Interior Finish Material [including smoke measurements, with total smoke release not to

exceed 10,764 ft 2 (1000 m 2 )]

UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction

FM Approval 4880, Approval Standard for Class 1 Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels; Plastic Interior FinishMaterials; Plastic Exterior Building Panels; Wall/Ceiling Coating Systems; Interior or Exterior Finish Systems

10.5.3.1.2

The tests shall be performed on a finished foamed plastic assembly related to the actual end-use configuration, including anycover or facing, and at the maximum thickness intended for use.


131 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

10.5.3.1.3*

Cellular or foamed plastic materials tested in accordance with UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction , orFM Approval 4880, Approval Standard for Class I Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior FinishMaterials or Coating, and Exterior Wall Systems , shall also be tested for smoke release using NFPA 286 , with the acceptancecriterion of 10.4.5.2 .

10.5.3.2

Cellular or foamed plastic shall be permitted for trim not in excess of 10 percent of the specific wall or ceiling area to which it is

applied, provided that it is not less than 20 lb/ft 3 (320 kg/m 3 ) in density, is limited to 1 ⁄2 in. (13 mm) in thickness and 4 in. (100mm) in width, and complies with the requirements for Class A or Class B interior wall and ceiling finish, as described in 10.4.2 ;however, the smoke developed index shall not be limited.

10.5.4* Light-Transmitting Plastics.

Light-transmitting plastics used as interior wall and ceiling finish shall be permitted based on large-scale fire tests that substantiatethe combustibility characteristics of the plastics for the use intended under actual fire conditions. The tests shall be performed on alight-transmitting plastic assembly related to the actual end-use configuration and on the maximum thickness intended for use.(See Section 48.7 .)

10.5.5 Metal Ceiling and Wall Panels.

Listed, factory-finished metal ceiling and wall panels meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTME84 or UL 723 ( see 10.4.2 ) shall be permitted to be finished with one additional application of paint. These painted panels shallbe permitted for use in areas where Class A interior finishes are required. The total paint thickness shall not exceed 1 ⁄28 in. (0.90mm).

10.5.6 Lockers.

10.5.6.1 Combustible Lockers.

Where lockers constructed of combustible materials other than wood are used, the lockers shall be considered interior finish andshall comply with Section 10.2 , except as permitted by 10.5.6.2 .

10.5.6.2 Wood Lockers.

Lockers constructed entirely of wood and of noncombustible materials shall be permitted to be used in any location where interiorfinish materials are required to meet a Class C classification in accordance with 10.4.1 .

10.5.7 Polypropylene (PP) and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE).

Polypropylene and high density polyethylene materials shall not be permitted to be used as interior wall or ceiling finish, unless thematerial complies with the requirements of 10.4.5.2 . The tests shall be performed on a finished assembly and on the maximumthickness intended for use.

10.5.8 Site-Fabricated Stretch Systems.

Site-fabricated stretch systems containing all three components described in the definition in Chapter 3 shall be tested in themanner intended for use and shall comply with the requirements of 10.4.1 or 10.4.1.2 . If the materials are tested in accordancewith ASTM E84 or UL 723, specimen preparation and mounting shall be in accordance with ASTM E2573.

10.5.9 Reflective Insulation Materials.

Reflective insulation materials shall be tested in the manner intended for use and shall comply with the requirements of 10.4.1 or10.4.1.2 . If the materials are tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, specimen preparation and mounting shall be inaccordance with ASTM E2599, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Reflective Insulation, RadiantBarrier, and Vinyl Stretch Ceiling Materials for Building Applications to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This section needs to be deleted because it is repetitive of what has been incorporated into the revised section 10.2.

Response Message:


Ballot Results



132 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry



Tyree, David P.


133 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.6 Trim and Incidental Finish.

10.6.1 General.

Interior wall and ceiling trim and incidental finish, other than wall base in accordance with 10.6.2 and bulletin boards and postersin accordance with 10.6.3 , not in excess of 10 percent of the specific wall and ceiling areas of any room or space to which it isapplied, shall be permitted to be Class C materials in occupancies where interior wall and ceiling finish of Class A or Class B isrequired

10.6.2 Wall Base.

Interior floor trim material used at the junction of the wall and the floor to provide a functional or decorative border, and notexceeding 6 in. (150 mm) in height, shall meet the interior wall finish requirements for its location or the requirements for Class IIinterior floor finish, as described in 10.7.4 , using the test described in 10.7.3 . If a Class I floor finish is required, the interior floortrim shall be Class I.

10.6.3 Bulletin Boards and Posters.

10.6.3.1

Bulletin boards and posters attached directly to the wall shall not exceed 20 percent of the aggregate wall area to which they areapplied.

10.6.3.2

The provision of 10.6.3.1 shall not apply to artwork and teaching materials in sprinklered educational or day-care occupancies inaccordance with 17.5.5.3 , 18.5.5 , or 18.6.5 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Already addressed in 10.2.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley


134 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry



Tyree, David P.


135 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.7* Interior Floor Finish Testing and Classification.

10.7.1*

Carpet and carpetlike interior floor finishes shall comply with ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics ofFinished Textile Floor Covering Materials .

10.7.2*

Floor coverings, other than carpet for which 10.3.2 establishes requirements for fire performance, shall have a minimum critical

radiant flux of 0.1 W/cm 2 .

10.7.3*

Interior floor finishes shall be classified in accordance with 10.7.4 , based on test results from NFPA 253 , or ASTM E648,Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source .

10.7.4

Interior floor finishes shall be grouped in the classes specified in 10.7.4.1 and 10.7.4.2 in accordance with the critical radiantflux requirements.

10.7.4.1 Class I Interior Floor Finish.

Class I interior floor finish shall have a critical radiant flux of not less than 0.45 W/cm 2 , as determined by the test described in10.7.3 .

10.7.4.2 Class II Interior Floor Finish.

Class II interior floor finish shall have a critical radiant flux of not less than 0.22 W/cm 2 , but less than 0.45 W/cm 2 , asdetermined by the test described in 10.7.3 .

10.7.5

Wherever the use of Class II interior floor finish is required, Class I interior floor finish shall be permitted.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Already covered in 10.2.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew


136 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.


Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry



Tyree, David P.


137 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


10.8 Automatic Sprinklers.

10.8.1

Other than as required in Section 10.5 , where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with Section55.3 , Class C interior wall and ceiling finish materials shall be permitted in any location where Class B is required, and Class Binterior wall and ceiling finish materials shall be permitted in any location where Class A is required.

10.8.2

Where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with Section 55.3 throughout the fire compartment orsmoke compartment containing the interior floor finish, Class II interior floor finish shall be permitted in any location where Class Iinterior floor finish is required; and where Class II is required, the provisions of 10.7.2 shall apply.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Already covered in 10.2.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


19 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

12 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Carrigan, Matthew

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Evans, Michael W.

Newman, Kathleen A.


Siegel, Shelley

Sloan, Dwayne E.

Affirmative All

Babrauskas, Vytenis

Boyer, Patrick

Fitch, William E.



138 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Lathrop, James K.


McKeon, Thomas W.


Paszczuk, Henry



Tyree, David P.


139 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


11.1.5.1

Means of egress shall be designed and maintained to provide headroom in accordance with other sections of this Code, and suchheadroom shall be not less than 7 ft 6 in. (2285 mm), with projections . Projections from the ceiling not shall provide headroom ofnot less than 6 ft 8 in. (2030 m mm ), with a tolerance of - − 3⁄4 in. (- − 19 mm), above the finished floor.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This comment corrects the text of the provision. Currently the text suggests that a projection may be 6ft 8 in, when it reallymeans that the vertical clearance should not be less than 6 ft 8 in above finished floor. It should be noted that this provisionseems to consider door headers to be projections, which they are not. Door openings and clearances are already addressedunder accessibility codes. The tolerance issue is not recommended to be deleted, as it was in the Public Input.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.


140 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Jackson, Waymon

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


141 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


11.1.6.5* Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.

11.1.6.5.1 General.

11.1.6.5.1.1

Where required by Chapters 15 through 31, new bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and showers, for use by occupants, shallbe provided with grab bars unless otherwise permitted by 11.1.6.5.1.2 . complying with 11.1.6.5.2 through 11.1.6.5.5 , except asotherwise permitted for showers in 11.1.6.5.1.2 , with all dimensions referring to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwisestipulated.

11.1.6.5.1.2

Grab bars shall not be required in showers where the transition from the room floor to the shower floor does not exceed 0.5 in. (13mm) in height and all shower surfaces are slip resistant when wet.

11.1.6.5.1.3

Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 11.1.6.5.2 through 11.1.6.5.4 .

11.1.6.5.1.4

All dimensions shall be measured to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stated.

11.1.6.5.1.2*

Where a dedicated shower does not expose users to changes in elevation exceeding 0.5 in. (13 mm), as described in 11.1.6.2 ,and it provides slip resistance for all surfaces when wet, as a foreseeable condition described in 11.1.6.4 , the requirements of11.1.6.5.2 through 11.1.6.5.5 shall apply only if grab bars are installed.

11.1.6.5.2 Vertical Grab Bar or Pole.

A vertical grab bar shall be provided either installed on the control end wall or the end wall opposite the control end wall of thebathtub, bathtub-shower combination, and or shower, as specified in accordance with 11.1.6.5.2.1, or shall be provided as a freestanding, an external vertical pole as specified in accordance with 11.1.6.5.2.2.

11.1.6.5.2.1* Vertical Grab Bar on Control End Wall Vertical Grab Bars .

End wall vertical grab bars shall comply with all the following:

(1) Vertical grab bars shall have a length of not less than 36 in. (914 mm).

(2) Vertical grab bars shall be located between 24 in. (610 mm) and 27 in. (686 mm) above the finished floor measured to thelower end.

(3) Vertical grab bars shall be installed on the open side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower used for entryand egress.

(4) Vertical grab bars shall be located between 9 in. (228 mm) and 12 in. (305 mm) from the open entry and egress side of thebathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower, measured horizontally from the exterior plane of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower.

11.1.6.5.2.1.1

A vertical grab bar with a minimum length of 24 in. (610 mm), and its lower end between 36 and 39 in. (915 and 990 mm) abovethe finished floor, shall be installed on the entry/egress side of the control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination,and shower unit.

11.1.6.5.2.1.3

The grab bar shall be located at least 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, from any shower curtain rod fixing point on the wall.

11.1.6.5.2.2* Vertical Grab Bar as Free Standing, External Vertical Pole Poles .

A vertical Vertical , pole-type grab bar bars shall be fixed to the floor and either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall and shallcomply with all of the following: wall shall be installed outside of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit within 6 in.(150 mm), measured horizontally, outside of the outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower and within 30 in.(760 mm), measured horizontally, of the vertical plane of the control end wall if there is such a wall.

(1) Poles shall be installed outside of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit.

(2) Poles shall be located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, of the outside of the outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower.

(3) Poles shall be located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally, of the vertical plane of the control end wall.

11.1.6.5.3 Back Wall Grab Bar.

For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on three sides by walls, a grab bar shall be provided on the back walleither as a diagonal grab bar as specified in accordance with 11.1.6.5.3.1 or as a horizontal grab bar as specified in accordance11.1.6.5.3.2 shall be provided on the back wall .

11.1.6.5.3.1* Back Wall Diagonal Grab Bar on Back Wall Bars .


142 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

11.1.6.5.3.1.1

A diagonal Diagonal grab bar bars shall be installed on the back wall comply with all of the following: a minimum length of 24 in.(600 mm) with its higher end placed closer to the control end wall and located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control endwall, with a height of 25 in. to 27 in. (635 mm to 685 mm) above the rim of the bathtub.

(1) Diagonal grab bars shall have a length of not less than 24 in. (600 mm).

(2) Diagonal grab bars shall be located so the higher end is closest to the control end wall.

(3) Diagonal grab bars shall be located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall.

(4) Diagonal grab bars shall be located 25 in. (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (685 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub.

(5) Diagonal grab bars shall be located so the lower end is 8 in. (203 mm) minimum and 10 in. (254 mm) maximum above the rimof the bathtub.

(6) Diagonal grab bars shall be located 28 in. (711 mm) minimum and 30 in. (760 mm) maximum from the control end wall.

11.1.6.5.3.1.2

The lower end of the diagonal grab bar shall be located at a height of 8 in. to 10 in. (205 mm to 255 mm) above the rim of thebathtub and 28 in. to 30 in. (710 mm to 760 mm) from the control end wall.

11.1.6.5.3.2 Back Wall Horizontal Grab Bar on Back Wall .

A horizontal Horizontal grab bar bars shall be installed on the back wall at a height of8 in. to 10 in. (205 mm to 255 mm)above thebathtub rim with one end located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall and the other end located a maximum of24 in. (610 mm) from the opposite, or head, end of the bathtub. comply with all of the following:

(1) Horizontal grab bars shall be located 8 in. (205 mm) minimum and 10 in. (255 mm) maximum above the bathtub rim.

(2) Horizontal grab bars shall be located so one end is 12 in. (305 mm) maximum from the control end wall and the other end islocated 24 in. (610 mm) maximum from the opposite, or head, end of the bathtub.

11.1.6.5.4* Grab Bar Details.

11.1.6.5.4.1

Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 11⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm).

11.1.6.5.4.2

If Where attached to a wall, the grab bar bars shall provide a minimum clearance for hand grasp of 11⁄2 in. (38 mm) minimum .

11.1.6.5.4.3

The size and clearance dimensions required by 11.1.6.5.4.1 and 11.1.6.5.4.2 shall be provided, as a minimum, within the heightrequirements range and the minimum length requirements range of the other provisions of 11.1.6.5 .

Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with other provisions of this Code.

11.1.6.5.5 Grab Bar Structural Loading.

Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions accordance with other provisions of this Code .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The SR incorporates PC-92 and editorial revisions for consistency with the Code.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

25 Affirmative All


143 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Guest, Rita C.


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Jackson, Waymon

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.


Bush, Kenneth E.

Although the presence of grab bars at showers and tubs may be a reasonable requirement for overall occupant safety, and while it isunderstood that the Scope of this Code has been expanded to include additional occupant safety measures, these requirements should notbe a part of this document. It is beyond the scope of the responsibility of fire officials to inspect and approve the installation of this type ofprotection. In addition, the consideration of these spaces as part of the required means of egress introduces a number of issues, to includeadequacy of headroom, the levelness and slip resistance of walking surfaces, the operation of tub and shower opening protectives to includeswinging and sliding doors and curtains, latches and locks installed for security measures, and levels of illumination; that are not regulated bycurrent Code provisions. These issues are of particular importance where curbs or sides are installed to control the spread of water duringnormal operations, ans where installations of grab bars or poles could be considered as obstructions to egress travel or reduction to requiredegress capacity.

Frable, David W.

I agree with the negative comment submitted by Mr. Bush.

Lampella, Gary

Of concern is the statement that all “new” bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations and showers be provided with grab bars will includereplacements. These will be regulated by the plumbing code with no reference back to these sections. We also have concerns withreplacement (new) fixtures as there was committee discussion on retrofitting grab bars and the proponent mentioned a test for an epoxy/glueattachment in-lieu of the typical mechanical attachment to solid blocking/backing. We have reservations about promoting this type ofattachment. An epoxy/glue attachment is only as strong as the surface it is attached to, not just new construction. We would suggest maybeadding an explanatory note indicating epoxy/glue attachments may not meet the structural loading requirements and mechanical attachment


144 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

to solid blocking/backing is the preferred method. There is also the issue of the proposed vertical grab bars, especially those from the floor tothe ceiling, which will be inviting for children to climb. This will more than likely lead to the unintended consequence of serious injuries due tothe misuse of the grab bars in dwelling units. It is obvious that the ramifications of this major change to the nation’s living spaces has not beenfully vetted. We are not convinced that these devices should be regulated by the person enforcing this code, which would be the fire codeofficial. We are also concerned about putting these requirements in the means of egress chapters while other activities in and around abathroom are not specifically regulated. Such as, transferring from a chair to a wheelchair, getting on and off a bed and other daily functionsthat pose a safety risk to many persons. We think the issue of “new” tub/showers, retrofits and inserting the language in the means of egresschapters should be addressed prior to insertion into the code.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


145 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


11.2.1.5.11

Where pairs of door leaves are required in a means of egress, one of the following criteria shall be met:

(1) Each leaf of the pair shall be provided with a releasing device that does not depend on the release of one door before the other.

(2) Approved automatic flush bolts shall be used and arranged such that both of the following criteria are met:

(a) The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egressside of the door .

(b) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation.

The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egress sideof the door.

Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 18 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs theTC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider editorially revising Section 11.2.1.5.11 to eliminate duplicate requirements:

11.2.1.5.11 Where pairs of door leaves are required in a means of egress, one of the following criteria shall be met:

(1) Each leaf of the pair shall be provided with a releasing device that does not depend on the release of one door before theother.

(2) Approved automatic flush bolts shall be used and arranged such that both of the following criteria are met:

(a)The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egressside of the door.

(b) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. Change is consistent with Section 7.2.1.5.11 in NFPA101.

These actions will be considered as a public comment.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention


146 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Jackson, Waymon

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


147 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


11.2.1.6.3 Elevator Lobby Exit Access Door Assemblies Locking.

Where permitted in Chapters 16 through 31, door assemblies separating the elevator lobby from the exit access required by11.4.1.6.1 shall be permitted to be electrically locked, provided that all the following criteria are met:

(1) The electrical locking hardware is listed in accordance with UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units .

(2) The building is protected throughout by a fire alarm system in accordance with Section 55.2.

(3) The building is protected throughout by an approved, electrically supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance withSection 55.3.

(4) Waterflow in the sprinkler system required by 11.2.1.6.3(3) is arranged to initiate the building fire alarm system.

(5) The elevator lobby is protected by an approved, supervised smoke detection system in accordance with Section 55.2.

(6) Detection of smoke by the detection system required by 11.2.1.6.3(5) is arranged to initiate the building fire alarm system andnotify building occupants.

(7) Initiation of the building fire alarm system by other than manual fire alarm boxes unlocks the electrical locks on elevator lobbydoors.

(8) Loss of power to the elevator lobby electrical lock system unlocks the electrical locks on the elevator lobby door assemblies.

(9) Once unlocked, the elevator lobby doors remain electrically unlocked until the building fire alarm system has been manuallyreset.

(10) Where the elevator lobby doors remain mechanically latched after being electrically unlocked, latch releasing hardware inaccordance with 11.2.1.5.5 is affixed to the doors.

(11) A two-way communication system is provided for communication between the elevator lobby and a central control point that isconstantly staffed.

(12) The central control point staff required by 11.2.1.6.3(11) is capable, trained, and authorized to provide emergency assistance.

(13) The provisions of 11.2.1.6.1 for delayed-egress electrically electrical locking systems are not applied to the elevator lobbydoors.

(14)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision responds to CC Note 16.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

* The provisions of 11.2.1.6.2 for sensor-release of electrically electrical locking systems are not applied to the elevator lobbydoors.


148 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Jackson, Waymon

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


149 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


11.2.1.7.1

Where a side-hinged or pivoted swinging door assembly is required to be equipped with panic hardware or fire exit hardware, suchhardware shall meet all of the following criteria:

(1) It shall consist of a cross bar or push pad,with the length of the actuating portion of which extends across the cross bar or pushpad not less than one-half of the width of the door leaf.

(2) It shall be mounted not less than 34 in. (865 mm), and not more than 48 in. (1220 mm), above the floor.

(3) It shall be constructed so that a horizontal force not to exceed 15 lbf (67 N) actuates the cross bar or push pad and latches.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 19 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs theTC on Means of Egress (MEA) to revise Section 11.2.1.7 to be consistent with changes made to Section 7.2.1.7 in NFPA 101as follows:

11.2.1.7.1 Where a side-hinged or pivoted swinging door assembly is required to be equipped with panic hardware or fire exithardware, such hardware shall meet all of the following criteria:

(1) It shall consist of a cross bar or push pad, with the length of the actuating portion of the cross bar or push pad not lessthan one-half of the width of the door leaf.

(2) It shall be mounted not less than 34 in. (865 mm), and not more than 48 in. (1220 mm), above the floor.

(3) It shall be constructed so that a horizontal force not to exceed 15 lbf (67 N) actuates the cross bar or push pad andlatches


ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois


150 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Jackson, Waymon

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


151 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


11.2.3.9.4

The requirement of 11.2.3.9.2 shall not apply to any of the following:

(1) Control wiring and power wiring utilizing a 2-hour rated cable or cable system

(2) Where Control wiring and power wiring encased with not less than 2 in. (51 mm) of concrete

(3) Control wiring and power wiring protected by a listed electrical circuit protective system with not less than a 2-hour- fire resistiverating




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision is intended for consistency with NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.



152 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Jackson, Waymon

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


153 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


11.3.1.1.1

The total capacity of the means of egress for any story, balcony, tier, or other occupied space shall be sufficient for the occupant loadthereof unless one of the following conditions exists:

(1) The authority having jurisdiction shall be permitted to establish the occupant load as the number of persons for which existingmeans of egress is adequate, provided that measures are established to prevent occupancy by a greater number of persons.

(2) The egress capacity shall have been previously approved as being adequate.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The SR is intended for consistency with NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)


154 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jackson, Waymon

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


155 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


16.1.1.5

Where construction, alteration, or demolition operations are conducted, the provisions of 4.5.5.4 shall apply.


Submitter Full Name: BLD-AXM


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision responds to correlating committee note CCN-5.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Bush, Lorrell

Conner, William

Herrera, Mark A.

Keberle, Kenneth F.

Scandaliato, Steven J.

Tubbs, Jeffrey S.

Affirmative All

Bushey, George D.

Center, Eric

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gandy, Max L.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Goosman, Donald G.

Hansen, Harold C.

Hollinger, David W.

Humble, Jonathan

Lake, John

Lambert, Josh

Miller, Gregory R.


156 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Pauls, Jake

Quinterno, Vincent

Roether, Ed

Ruling, Karl G.

Schweitzer, Charles J.

Sherman, Philip R.

Shirey, Jeffrey

Thomas, Jr., Elbert R.

Washburn, Janet A.


157 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


16.3.4.4 Carbon Monoxide Detection.

16.3.4.4.1

New assembly occupancies shall be provided with carbon monoxide detection and warning equipment in accordance with Section55.11 in the locations specified as follows:

(1) On the ceilings of rooms containing permanently installed fuel-buring burning appliances or fuel-burning fireplaces

(2) Centrally located within occupiable spaces served by the first supply air register from a permanently installed, fuel-burningHVAC system

(3)

Centrally located within occupiable spaces adjacent to an attached garage with a separation wall constructed of gypsumwallboard

16.3.4.4.2

Carbon monoxide detectors as specified in 16.3.4.4.1 shall not be required in the following locations:

(1) Garages

(2) Occupiable spaces with communicating attached garages that are open parking structures as defined in 3.3.633.11.4

(3) Occupiable spaces with communicating attached garages that are mechanically ventilated in accordance with the mechanicalcode

Occupiable spaces having a separation wall constructed of gypsum wallboard with attached garages that are open parkingstructures as defined in 3.3.633.11.4

Occupiable spaces having a separation wall constructed of gypsum wallboard with attached garages that are mechanicallyventilated in accordance with the mechanical code



5000-SR1-AXM.docx New A.16.3.4.4.1(3)


Submitter Full Name: BLD-AXM


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revisions respond to correlating committee note CCN-20. See attachment for new A.16.3.4.4.1(3).

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 16.3.4.3.7]

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

* Centrally located within occupiable spaces adjacent to a communicating attached garage an attached garage


158 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Bush, Lorrell

Conner, William

Herrera, Mark A.

Keberle, Kenneth F.

Scandaliato, Steven J.

Tubbs, Jeffrey S.

Affirmative All

Bushey, George D.

Center, Eric

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gandy, Max L.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Goosman, Donald G.

Hansen, Harold C.

Hollinger, David W.

Humble, Jonathan

Lake, John

Lambert, Josh

Miller, Gregory R.

Pauls, Jake

Quinterno, Vincent

Roether, Ed

Ruling, Karl G.

Schweitzer, Charles J.

Sherman, Philip R.

Shirey, Jeffrey

Thomas, Jr., Elbert R.

Washburn, Janet A.


159 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.16.3.4.4.1(3)

The intent is to require CO detectors in

occupiable spaces immediately adjacent,

vertically or horizontally, to attached garages,

regardless of the presence of openings

between the garage and the adjacent

occupiable spaces. Other occupiable spaces

that are not adjacent to the attached garage do

not require CO detectors.

of 391


17.2.2.2.4* Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry.

Classroom doors shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that the locking means is approved and all ofthe following conditions are met:

The locking means is approved.

The locking means can be engaged without opening the door.

The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door can be accomplished without the use of a key or tool.

The unlocking and unlatching requires not more than one releasing operation.

The unlocking and unlatching means are mounted at a height not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor.

Locks, if remotely engaged, can be unlocked from the classroom side.

The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room by staff with the necessary key or other credential.

The locking means does not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware.

Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80 .

An emergency action plan shall be provided, addressing the use of the locking and unlocking means, from within and outsidethe room.

Staff is drilled in the engagement and release of the locking means, from within and outside the room, as part of emergencyegress drills.

(1) The locking means shall be capable of being engaged without opening the door.

(2) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door shall be accomplished without the use of a key, tool, orspecial knowledge or effort.

(3) The releasing mechanism shall open the door leaf with not more than one releasing operation.

(4) The releasing mechanism for unlocking and unlatching shall be located at a height not less than 34 in. (865 mm) and notexceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor.

(5) Locks, if remotely engaged, shall be unlockable from the classroom side of the door without the use of a key, tool, or specialknowledge or effort.

(6) The door shall be capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room with the necessary key or other credential.

(7) The locking means shall not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware.

(8) Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80 .



A.17.2.2.2.4.docx


Submitter Full Name: BLD-END


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Committee supports the First Draft text with minor modifications as directed by the Correlating Committee. The chargingstatement has been updated to clarify that classroom doors are permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry only if thelocking means is approved and all of the criteria in the list are met. Numbered items were updated with the word "shall" foreditorial correction. Text was added to clarify that the unlocking and unlatching operation in the classroom cannot require the useof key, tool, special knowledge or effort which is consistent with other locking and latching provisions in Chapter 11. A minimumheight for the location of the releasing mechanism, consistent with Chapter 11, was added to ensure that the mechanism was notlocated on the floor or low on the door and the text was updated to clarify that it is the releasing mechanism that must be locatedwithin the 34-48" range. Item 7 has been updated to delete 'by staff' from the First Revision as it was too specific. It may not justbe staff opening the door, it could be first responders for example.


160 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security – Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors againstunwanted entry and accepted the need that a second locking means may be needed for existing buildings. The multipleprovisions proposed as part of 17.2.2.2.4 address the concerns for accomplishing door locking in a safe manner. The detailedcriteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar withtraditional egress needs.

ResponseMessage:


Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 17.2.2.2.3.3]

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

17 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Biddle, Judy

Wolf, Ann Marie A.

Affirmative All

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Day, Richard L.


Ellis, Jason

Frangiamore, Keith S.

Gandy, Max L.

Haidacher, Jeffrey L.

Hopper, Howard

Kasmauskas, Dominick G.

Lazebnik, Rosa

Longhitano, Alfred J.

Merck, Richard E.

Roberts, Richard Jay

Roeper, Kurt A.

Savage, Sr., Michael L.

Sinsigalli, Michael L.

Szachnowicz, Aleksy L.


Aler, Clay P.

Item (3) should state two releasing operations to be consistent with the same section for existing educational in NFPA 101.


The conflict between security and life safety has come to a head in recent years and it can no longer be ignored. There have been too manyincidents that has created substantial concern with families of students and staff that occupy educational buildings. The fire authorities need tobe able to address the fears of families, staff, and students while at the same time continue to provide a viable means of egress forevacuation or relocation purposes. Two efforts have been started in which I have participated in both: The Workshop on School Safety, Codesand Security, (December 2014) where the Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors against unwanted entry and acceptedthe need that a second locking means may be needed for new and existing buildings. Another important effort (which is still ongoing) is seen


161 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

by ASIS International and the NFPA to create either a document to address in totality the combined security/life safety needs of buildings.This effort sees the need for security and life safety authorities need to work together, inserting language in the already existent model codesthat will create buildings that work both ways: Prevent unwanted intruders but also permit safe and timely egress if needed—with human andlife safety as the first priority.The multiple provisions proposed as part of 17.2.2.2.4 will weed out the dangerous locking hardware beingpromoted in the marketplace. This is a common code question submitted to my agency and 99.9% the widgets that are being promoted areeven more dangerous, not allowing students the ability to open doors in the event of fire so they can evacuate or preventing first respondersfrom gaining entry. Without guidance from the AHJ from a model code organization, such as NFPA,they will continue to be installed. Securityorganizations are promoting these “security devices” without any consideration or discussion with the local fire authorities and even assistingwith financing for their installation, again without notifying the local fire authorities. This has been happening for years (the biggest pushstarted after Sandy Hook). Again, the security concerns of families and staff has reached a point where if we return to existing language,these more dangerous “security widgets” will continue to be installed.


Mertens, Matthew J.

While the proposed changes may be helpful in that it puts conditions for these actions in one place, the IFMA board is in opposition to thischange for the following reasons: 1. That any modifications to doors will likely result in a violation of the listing for rated doors 2. Existinglocking provisions allow adequate locking, admittedly the owner will be required to update or replace the hardware, but this will allow for theproper hardware to be incorporated into the door and to be compliant with the code 3. We remain concerned about the ability of responders togain entry to secure the incident 4. And, the additions to the “new” construction are not justified since existing locking hardware exists that canbe part of the door and be compliant with the current code.


162 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.17.2.2.2.4 While Section 17.2.2.2.4 establishes locking criteria for classroom doors only, there may be situations where a school’s emergency action plan identifies other areas that may need to be secured. The provisions of this Section may be considered when evaluating those areas as well. Examples of those areas are administrative offices, gymnasiums, teacher lounges, libraries, auditoriums, and cafeterias.

of 391


17.3.2.1 General.

Rooms or spaces for the storage, processing, or use of materials specified in the list that follows shall be protected in accordancewith the following:

(1) Separation from the remainder of the building by fire barriers having a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour or protectionof such rooms by automatic extinguishing systems as specified in Section 8.15 in the following areas:

(a) Boiler and furnace rooms, other than those enclosing only air-handling equipment

(b) Rooms or spaces used for the storage of combustible supplies in quantities deemed hazardous by the authority havingjurisdiction

(c) Rooms or spaces used for the storage of hazardous materials or flammable or combustible liquids in quantities deemedhazardous by recognized standards

(d) Janitor closets, other than those protected by automatic sprinklers, which are permitted to have doors with ventilatinglouvers

(2) Separation from the remainder of the building by fire barriers having a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour andprotection of such rooms by automatic extinguishing systems as specified in Section 8.15 in the following areas:

(a)

(b) Maintenance shops, including woodworking and painting areas

(c) Rooms or spaces used for processing or use of combustible supplies deemed hazardous by the authority havingjurisdiction

(d) Rooms or spaces used for processing or use of hazardous materials or flammable or combustible liquids in quantitiesdeemed hazardous by recognized standards

(3) Where automatic extinguishing is used to meet the requirements of 17.3.2.1(1) or 17.3.2.1(2), protection permitted inaccordance with 55.3.1.2




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This comment proposes to delete redundant text "specified in the list that follows".

Response Message:


Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Biddle, Judy

* Laundries


163 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Wolf, Ann Marie A.

Affirmative All

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Day, Richard L.


Ellis, Jason


Gandy, Max L.


Hopper, Howard


Lazebnik, Rosa


Merck, Richard E.

Mertens, Matthew J.


Roeper, Kurt A.






Aler, Clay P.

No additional comment on this proposal


164 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


17.3.4.5 Risk Analysis for Mass Notification Systems.

A risk analysis for mass notification systems shall be provided in accordance with Section 55.13 shall be performed to determine ifa mass notification system is required .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The committee has reviewed the provisions of Section 55.13 and supports the changes made to the text during the SecondDraft. Reference to Section 55.13 is being retained. Updates to Section 17.3.4.5 are editorial and help clarify that the riskanalysis is required prior to determining if a mass notification system is necessary.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Biddle, Judy

Wolf, Ann Marie A.

Affirmative All

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Day, Richard L.


Ellis, Jason


Gandy, Max L.


Hopper, Howard


Lazebnik, Rosa


Merck, Richard E.

Mertens, Matthew J.


165 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Roeper, Kurt A.





Aler, Clay P.




Neither the building owners nor the consulting industry have guidelines or norms to assess and weight the analysis. Also, the AHJ communityis lacking same. It will add cost to the system with limited potential application or benefits to the majority of single building school projects.


166 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


17.3.8 Integrated Fire Protection Systems.

Integrated fire protection systems shall be tested in accordance with 55.1.4 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Committee supports the language as proposed in new Section 55.1.4 which requires where two or more fire protection orlife safety systems are integrated, the integrated system test shall verify the proper operation and function of such systems inaccordance with NFPA 4. Reference to this new section is being added for both new educational occupancies and newdaycare occupancies.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Biddle, Judy

Wolf, Ann Marie A.

Affirmative All

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Day, Richard L.


Ellis, Jason


Gandy, Max L.


Hopper, Howard

Lazebnik, Rosa


Merck, Richard E.

Mertens, Matthew J.



167 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Roeper, Kurt A.






Aler, Clay P.




The negative ballot is cast for several reasons. The result of the proposed text is far reaching and will have multiple outcomes when it isenforced by local authorities having jurisdiction. Integrated system is not defined in NFPA 101 and the definition in NFPA 4 is very unclear asto the extent of the testing, especially as explained by the annex text (A.3.3.12.1.3) in NFPA 4. Furthermore, the life safety system and fireprotection system is also not defined in NFPA 101 or NFPA 5000. These definitions are important to go forward with this language to provideuniform enforcement. It is very important to note that if this proposal goes forward, it will conflict with the other model building and fire codes(IBC/IFC, proposal F145-16) that are developing their 2018 editions. The IFC/IBC is limiting NFPA 4 to high rise buildings (as is the First DraftReport, NFPA 101, Section 11.8.9) and where smoke control systems are integrated. It is common in several states that the IBC and NFPA101 is used across multiple jurisdictions. Having conflicting requirements between the documents is not new, but the extent of testingintegrated systems should be consistent for building owners, contractors, and authorities having jurisdiction.


168 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


18.1.1.9*

Places of religious worship shall not be required to meet the provisions of this chapter when providing day care while services arebeing held in the building. Rooms or spaces used for temporary child care, during short-term activities of the child’s relative orguardian within the same building, shall not be required to meet the provisions of this chapter.



5000_SR-3006_A.18.1.1.9_END.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The language assists in clarifying the application of provisions for day care occupancies. The proposed text expands currentCode provisions allowing some incidental day care use in places of worship to not be classified as day care occupancies. Thetext specifically requires the clients relative or guardian to be in the same building so that quick and immediate access to thechildren during emergencies can occur. Proposed text is consistent with language in NFPA 101.

Annex: Proposed Annex language provides examples of scenarios that may apply the provisions of new 18.1.1.9.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Biddle, Judy

Wolf, Ann Marie A.

Affirmative All

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Day, Richard L.


Ellis, Jason


Gandy, Max L.



169 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hopper, Howard


Lazebnik, Rosa


Merck, Richard E.


Roeper, Kurt A.






Aler, Clay P.


Mertens, Matthew J.

While supportive of this concept for unlicensed and unregulated temporary child care uses the language of "short term" is very subjective andI would hope to see some guiding language added to the annex for this section that clarifies the intent of this section so it is not abused.


170 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

SR‐3006, [END], new annex

A.18.1.1.9

The definition of day-care occupancy is intended to exclude day-care uses that are part of some other occupancy. In such cases, the requirements of the predominant occupancy apply. Examples of excluded facilities include the following:

1. Rooms located within places of worship used as nurseries or for supervision of children or religious education while services are being held in the building. 2. Rooms used for temporary child care during short-term recreational activities of the child's relative or guardian, such as within a health club or park district. 3. Rooms used for temporary child care during short-term activities such as court hearings, medical appointments, libraries or other similar circumstances.

of 391

Second Revision No. 3003-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 18.2.2.2.7 ]

18.2.2.2.8 Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry.

Classroom doors shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that the locking means is approved and all ofthe following conditions are met:


(2) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door shall be accomplished without the use of a key, tool, orspecial knowledge or effort.



(5) Locks, if remotely engaged, shall be unlockable from the classroom side of the door without the use of a key, tool, or specialknowledge or effort.



(8) Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Workship on School Safety, Codes and Security - Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors againstunwanted entry. The multiple provisions provisions proposed are based on the provisions for locking classroom doors ineducational occupancies. In addition to the reasons documented for allowing door locking in educational occupancies, theprotection features are predicated on equal if not greater staffing found in day care occupancies.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

17 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Biddle, Judy

Wolf, Ann Marie A.

Affirmative All

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Day, Richard L.


171 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Ellis, Jason


Gandy, Max L.


Hopper, Howard


Lazebnik, Rosa


Merck, Richard E.


Roeper, Kurt A.





Aler, Clay P.



The conflict between security and life safety has come to a head in recent years and it can no longer be ignored. There have been too manyincidents that has created substantial concern with families of students and staff that occupy educational buildings. The fire authorities need tobe able to address the fears of families, staff, and students while at the same time continue to provide a viable means of egress forevacuation or relocation purposes. Two efforts have been started in which I have participated in both: The Workshop on School Safety, Codesand Security, (December 2014) where the Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors against unwanted entry and acceptedthe need that a second locking means may be needed for new and existing buildings. Another important effort (which is still ongoing) is seenby ASIS International and the NFPA to create either a document to address in totality the combined security/life safety needs of buildings.This effort sees the need for security and life safety authorities need to work together, inserting language in the already existent model codesthat will create buildings that work both ways: Prevent unwanted intruders but also permit safe and timely egress if needed—with human andlife safety as the first priority. The multiple provisions proposed as part of 18.2.2.2.7 will weed out the dangerous locking hardware beingpromoted in the marketplace. This is a common code question submitted to my agency and 99.9% the widgets that are being promoted areeven more dangerous, not allowing students the ability to open doors in the event of fire so they can evacuate or preventing first respondersfrom gaining entry. Without guidance from the AHJ from a model code organization, such as NFPA,they will continue to be installed. Securityorganizations are promoting these “security devices” without any consideration or discussion with the local fire authorities and even assistingwith financing for their installation, again without notifying the local fire authorities. This has been happening for years (the biggest pushstarted after Sandy Hook). Again, the security concerns of families and staff has reached a point where if we return to existing language,these more dangerous “security widgets” will continue to be installed.


Mertens, Matthew J.

While the proposed changes may be helpful in that it puts conditions for these actions in one place, the IFMA board is in opposition to thischange for the following reasons: 1. That any modifications to doors will likely result in a violation of the listing for rated doors 2. Existinglocking provisions allow adequate locking, admittedly the owner will be required to update or replace the hardware, but this will allow for theproper hardware to be incorporated into the door and to be compliant with the code 3. We remain concerned about the ability of responders togain entry to secure the incident 4. And, the additions to the “new” construction are not justified since existing locking hardware exists that canbe part of the door and be compliant with the current code.


172 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


18.3.5.4

Day-care occupancy buildings with clients under 24 30 months old or clients incapable of self-preservation shall be protectedthroughout by an approved, electrically supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 55.3.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In response to the Correlating Committee, the text is changing from 24 to 30 months, which is consistent with the definitionof self-preservation for day care occupancies and consistent with the language in NFPA 101 using the 30 month threshold.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Biddle, Judy

Wolf, Ann Marie A.

Affirmative All

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Day, Richard L.


Ellis, Jason


Gandy, Max L.


Hopper, Howard


Lazebnik, Rosa


Merck, Richard E.

Mertens, Matthew J.



173 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Roeper, Kurt A.






Aler, Clay P.



174 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



Integrated fire protection systems shall be tested in accordance with 55.1.4 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Committee supports the language as proposed in new Section 55.1.4 which requires where two or more fire protection orlife safety systems are integrated, the integrated system test shall verify the proper operation and function of such systems inaccordance with NFPA 4. Reference to this new section is being added for both new educational occupancies and newdaycare occupancies.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Biddle, Judy

Wolf, Ann Marie A.

Affirmative All

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Day, Richard L.


Ellis, Jason


Gandy, Max L.


Hopper, Howard

Lazebnik, Rosa


Merck, Richard E.

Mertens, Matthew J.



175 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Roeper, Kurt A.






Aler, Clay P.






176 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


18.3.7 Subdivision of Building Spaces.

Where day-care occupancies, other than day-care homes, with clients who are 24 30 months old or less or who are incapable ofself-preservation, are located one or more stories above the level of exit discharge, or where day-care occupancies are located twoor more stories above the level of exit discharge, smoke barriers shall be provided to divide such stories into a minimum of twosmoke compartments. The smoke barriers shall be constructed in accordance with Section 8.11 but shall not be required to have afire resistance rating.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In response to the Correlating Committee, the text is changing from 24 to 30 months, which is consistent with the definitionof self-preservation for day care occupancies and consistent with the language in NFPA 101 using the 30 month threshold.

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Biddle, Judy

Wolf, Ann Marie A.

Affirmative All

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Day, Richard L.


Ellis, Jason


Gandy, Max L.


Hopper, Howard


Lazebnik, Rosa


Merck, Richard E.

Mertens, Matthew J.



177 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Roeper, Kurt A.






Aler, Clay P.



178 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



179 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

19.2.3.2*


180 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Aisles, corridors, and ramps required for exit access in a hospital or nursing home shall be not less than 8 ft (2440 mm) in clear andunobstructed width, unless otherwise permitted by one of the following:

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) Projections into the required width shall be permitted for wheeled equipment, provided that all of the following conditions aremet:

(a) The wheeled equipment does not reduce the clear unobstructed corridor width to less than 60 in. (1525 mm).

(b) The health care occupancy fire safety plan and training program address the relocation of the wheeled equipment during afire or similar emergency.

(c)

(5)

(6)

(7) Nursing home corridors shall be permitted to be not less than 6 ft (1830 mm) wide in smoke compartments housing not morethan 30 patients.

(8) Cross-corridor door openings in corridors with a required minimum width of 6 ft (1830 mm) shall have a clear width of not lessthan 64 in. (1625 mm) for pairs of doors or a clear width of not less than 32 in. (810 mm) for a single door.

(9) Where the corridor width is at least 8 ft (2440 mm), projections into the required width shall be permitted for emergency stairtravel devices, provided that all of the following conditions are met:

(a) These devices do not reduce the clear unobstructed corridor width to less than 72 in. (1830 mm).

(b) These devices are secured to the wall.

(c) Where furniture is placed in the corridor in accordance with 19.2.3.2(5), the emergency stair travel devices are placed onthe same side of the corridor as the furniture.

(d) These devices are located so as to not obstruct access to building service and fire protection equipment.

(e) These devices are grouped such that each grouping does not exceed a projected floor area of 12 ft2 (3.7 m2).

(f) The groupings addressed in 19.2.3.2(9)(5) are separated from each other by a distance of at least 10 ft (3050 mm).

(10) Self-retracting seats fixed to the wall shall be permitted provided all of the following are met:

(a) The seats comply with ASTM F851, Standard Test Method for Self-Rising Seat Mechanisms .

(b) The seats automatically return to their normally retracted position, at which time the seat projection into the means ofegress complies with 11.3.2.2 and does not interfere with the means of egress.

(c) The self-retracting seats are normally in the retracted position and project not more than 4 in. (100 mm) from the wall.

* Aisles, corridors, and ramps in adjunct areas not intended for the housing, treatment, or use of inpatients shall be not less than44 in. (1120 mm) in clear and unobstructed width.

* Projections from the corridor wall shall be permitted by one of the following:

(a) Noncontinuous projections not more than 4 in. (100 mm) from the corridor wall, positioned not less than 38 in. (965 mm)above the floor, shall be permitted.

(b) Noncontinuous projections of more than 4 in. (100 mm) but not more than 6 in. (150 mm) from the corridor wall shall bepermitted provided that both of the following are met:

i. The projecting item is positioned not less than 38 in. (965 mm) above the floor

ii. A vertical extension is provided below the projection such that the extension has a leading edge that is within 4 in. (100mm) of the leading edge of the projection at a point that is 27 in. (685 mm) maximum above the floor

* Exit access within a room or suite of rooms complying with the requirements of 19.2.5 shall be permitted.

* The wheeled equipment is limited to the following:

i. Equipment in use and carts in use

ii. Medical emergency equipment not in use

iii. Patient lift and transport equipment

* Where the corridor width is at least 8 ft (2440 mm), projections into the required width shall be permitted for fixed furniture,provided that all of the following conditions are met:

(a) The fixed furniture is securely attached to the floor or to the wall.

(b) The fixed furniture does not reduce the clear unobstructed corridor width to less than 6 ft (1830 mm), except as permittedby 19.2.3.2(2).

(c) The fixed furniture is located only on one side of the corridor.

(d) The fixed furniture is grouped such that each grouping does not exceed an area of 50 ft2 (4.6 m2).

(e) The fixed furniture groupings addressed in 19.2.3.2(5)(d) are separated from each other by a distance of at least 10 ft(3050 mm).

(f)

(g) Corridors throughout the smoke compartment are protected by an electrically supervised automatic smoke detectionsystem in accordance with 19.3.4 18.3.4 , or the fixed furniture spaces are arranged and located to allow direct supervisionby the facility staff from a nurses’ station or similar space.

* The fixed furniture is located so as to not obstruct access to building service and fire protection equipment.

* Cross-corridor door openings in corridors with a required minimum width of 8 ft (2440 mm) shall have a clear width of not lessthan 6 ft 11 in. (2110 mm) for pairs of doors or a clear width of not less than 41 1⁄2 in. (1055 mm) for a single door.


181 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

(d) Exposed upholstery components, where provided, meet the requirements for Class I when tested in accordance withNFPA 260.


Submitter Full Name: BLD-HEA


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jul 20 10:16:44 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision responds to Correlating Committee Note CCN-25; adds self-retracting seat criteria for consistency withNFPA 101; corrects cross-reference in (5)(g).

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


25 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Harmeyer, Robert J.

Pethe, Ben

Affirmative All

Bush, Kenneth E.

Crowley, Michael A.

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Davy, Matthew W.

Epstein, Alice L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Furdell, Gary


Gleason, Eric

Harris, Donald W.

Hood, David R.

Horeis, Richard M.

Klein, David P.

Koffel, William E.

Merrill II, James

Prediger, G. Brian


182 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Rickard, John A.


Schmitt, Dennis L.

Schultz, Terry

Spaanbroek, Steven G.

Widdekind, Michael D.

Worley, Fred


183 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


19.2.3.3

Aisles, corridors, and ramps required for exit access in a limited care facility or hospital for psychiatric care shall be not less than 6 ft(1830 mm) in clear and unobstructed width, unless otherwise permitted by one of the following:

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4) Projections into the required width shall be permitted for wheeled equipment, provided that all of the following conditions aremet:

(a) The wheeled equipment does not reduce the clear unobstructed corridor width to less than 60 in. (1525 mm).

(b) The health care occupancy fire safety plan and training program address the relocation of the wheeled equipment during afire or similar emergency.

(c)

(5)

(6) Where the corridor width is at least 8 ft (2440 mm), projections into the required width shall be permitted for emergency stairtravel devices, provided that all of the following conditions are met:

(a) These devices do not reduce the clear unobstructed corridor width to less than 72 in. (1830 mm).

(b) These devices are secured to the wall.

(c) Where furniture is placed in the corridor in accordance with 19.2.3.2(5), the emergency stair travel devices are placed onthe same side of the corridor as the furniture.

(d) These devices are located so as to not obstruct access to building service and fire protection equipment.

(e) These devices are grouped such that each grouping does not exceed a projected floor area of 12 ft2 (3.7 m2).

(f) The groupings addressed in 19.2.3.3(6)(e) are separated from each other by a distance of at least 10 ft (3050 mm).

(7) Self-retracting seats fixed to the wall shall be permitted provided all of the following are met:

(a) The seats comply with ASTM F851, Standard Test Method for Self-Rising Seat Mechanisms .

(b) The seats automatically return to their normally retracted position, at which time the seat projection into the means ofegress complies with 11.3.2.2 and does not interfere with the means of egress.

(c) The self-retracting seats are normally in the retracted position and project not more than 4 in. (100 mm) from the wall.

(d) Exposed upholstery components, where provided, meet the requirements for Class I when tested in accordance withNFPA 260 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

* Aisles, corridors, and ramps in adjunct areas not intended for the housing, treatment, or use of inpatients shall be not less than44 in. (1120 mm) in clear and unobstructed width.

* Projections from the corridor wall shall be permitted by one of the following:

(a) Noncontinuous projections not more than 4 in. (100 mm) from the corridor wall, positioned not less than 38 in. (965 mm)above the floor, shall be permitted.

(b) Noncontinuous projections of more than 4 in. (100 mm) but not more than 6 in. (150 mm) from the corridor wall shall bepermitted provided that both of the following are met:

i. The projecting item is positioned not less than 38 in. (965 mm) above the floor

ii. A vertical extension is provided below the projection such that the extension has a leading edge that is within 4 in. (100mm) of the leading edge of the projection at a point that is 27 in. (685 mm) maximum above the floor

* Exit access within a room or suite of rooms complying with the requirements of 19.2.5 18.2.5 shall be permitted.

* The wheeled equipment is limited to the following:

i. Equipment in use and carts in use

ii. Medical emergency equipment not in use

iii. Patient lift and transport equipment

* Cross-corridor door openings in corridors with a required minimum width of 6 ft (1830 mm) shall have a clear width of not lessthan 64 in. (1625 mm) for pairs of doors or a clear width of not less than 41 1⁄2 in. (1055 mm) for a single door.


184 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The proposed revision corrects the cross-reference in (3) and adds self-retracting seat criteria for consistency withNFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


25 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Harmeyer, Robert J.

Pethe, Ben

Affirmative All

Bush, Kenneth E.

Crowley, Michael A.

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Davy, Matthew W.

Epstein, Alice L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Furdell, Gary


Gleason, Eric

Harris, Donald W.

Hood, David R.

Horeis, Richard M.

Klein, David P.

Koffel, William E.

Merrill II, James

Prediger, G. Brian

Rickard, John A.


Schmitt, Dennis L.

Schultz, Terry



Worley, Fred


185 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


19.3.4.6 Integrated Fire Protection Systems.

The commissioning of integrated fire protection systems shall be in accordance with 55.1.4 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision mandates the application of the new 55.1.4, which addresses testing of integrated fire protectionsystems.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


25 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Harmeyer, Robert J.

Pethe, Ben

Affirmative All

Bush, Kenneth E.

Crowley, Michael A.

Davy, Matthew W.

Epstein, Alice L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Furdell, Gary


Harris, Donald W.

Hood, David R.

Horeis, Richard M.

Koffel, William E.

Merrill II, James

Prediger, G. Brian

Rickard, John A.



186 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Schmitt, Dennis L.

Schultz, Terry



Worley, Fred


Dannaway, Samuel S.

The additional cost burden is not justified.

Gleason, Eric


Klein, David P.

I agree with Mr. Dannaway that the additional costs associated with this requirement have not been justified.


187 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


19.3.6.1 General.

Corridors shall be separated from all other areas by partitions complying with 19.3.6.2 through 19.3.6.5(see also 19.2.5.4), unlessotherwise permitted by one of the following:

(1) Spaces shall be permitted to be unlimited in area and open to the corridor, provided that all of the following criteria are met:

(a)

(b) The corridors onto which the spaces open in the same smoke compartment are protected by an electrically supervisedautomatic smoke detection system in accordance with 19.3.4, or the smoke compartment in which the space is located isprotected throughout by quick-response sprinklers.

(c)

(d) The space does not obstruct access to required exits.

(2) Waiting areas shall be permitted to be open to the corridor, provided that all of the following criteria are met:

(a) The aggregate waiting area in each smoke compartment does not exceed 600 ft2 (55.7 m2).

(b)

(c) The area does not obstruct access to required exits.

(3)

(4) Gift shops not exceeding 500 ft2 (46.5 m2) shall be permitted to be open to the corridor or lobby.

(5) In a limited care facility, group meeting or multipurpose therapeutic spaces shall be permitted to open to the corridor, providedthat all of the following criteria are met:

(a) The space is not a hazardous area.

(b)

(c) The area does not obstruct access to required exits.

(6) Cooking facilities in accordance with 19.3.2.5.3 shall be permitted to be open to the corridor.



5000-SR-5004.docx New/revised A.19.3.6.1's.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision is intended for consistency with NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


25 Eligible Voters

* The spaces are not used for patient sleeping rooms, treatment rooms, or hazardous areas.

* The open space is protected by an electrically supervised automatic smoke detection system in accordance with 19.3.4,or the entire space is arranged and located to allow direct supervision by the facility staff from a nurses' station or similarspace.

* Each area is protected by an electrically supervised automatic smoke detection system in accordance with 19.3.4, oreach area is arranged and located to allow direct supervision by the facility staff from a nursing station or similar space.

* The requirement of 19.3.6.1 shall not apply to spaces for nurses’ stations.

* The space is protected by an electrically supervised automatic smoke detection system in accordance with 19.3.4, or thespace is arranged and located to allow direct supervision by the facility staff from the nurses’ station or similar location.


188 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

2 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Harmeyer, Robert J.

Pethe, Ben

Affirmative All

Bush, Kenneth E.

Crowley, Michael A.

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Davy, Matthew W.

Epstein, Alice L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Furdell, Gary


Gleason, Eric

Harris, Donald W.

Hood, David R.

Horeis, Richard M.

Klein, David P.

Koffel, William E.

Merrill II, James

Prediger, G. Brian

Rickard, John A.


Schmitt, Dennis L.

Schultz, Terry



Worley, Fred


189 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.19.3.6.1(1)(c)

The omission of smoke detection does not pertain to nurses’ stations that are not continuously staffed

as there would not be early detection by staff in such areas during “off” hours.

A.19.3.6.1(2)(b)



A.19.3.6.1(3)

A typical nurses’ station would normally contain one or more of the following with associated furniture and furnishings:

1. Charting area 2. Clerical area 3. Nourishment station 4. Storage of small amounts of medications, medical equipment and supplies, clerical

supplies, and linens 5. Patient monitoring and communication equipment



A.19.3.6.1(5)(b)



of 391


19.3.7.3

Any required smoke barrier shall be constructed in accordance with Section 8.11 and shall have a minimum 1-hour fire resistancerating, unless otherwise permitted by one of the following:

(1) This requirement shall not apply where an atrium is used, and both of the following criteria also shall apply:

(a) Smoke barriers shall be permitted to terminate at an atrium wall constructed in accordance with 8.12.3(1)(b).

(b) Not less than two separate smoke compartments shall be provided on each floor.

(2)

(3) The requirements of 8.11.5.2 and 8.11.7.2 shall not apply.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision exempts health care occupancy smoke barriers from the air-leakage rating requirements of 8.11.5.2 and 8.11.7.2for through-penetrations and joints, respectively. Health care occupancy smoke barriers already must have a fire resistancerating; the fire barrier requirements of Section 8.4 sufficiently restrict the passage of smoke.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


25 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Harmeyer, Robert J.

Pethe, Ben

Affirmative All

Bush, Kenneth E.

Crowley, Michael A.

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Davy, Matthew W.

Epstein, Alice L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Furdell, Gary

* Smoke dampers shall not be required in duct penetrations of smoke barriers in fully ducted heating, ventilating, andair-conditioning systems.


190 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Gleason, Eric

Harris, Donald W.

Hood, David R.

Horeis, Richard M.

Klein, David P.

Koffel, William E.

Merrill II, James

Prediger, G. Brian

Rickard, John A.


Schmitt, Dennis L.

Schultz, Terry


Worley, Fred



Since this paragraph section is requiring a smoke barrier to be constructed to have a 1-hour fire resistance rating, those provisions ofChapter 8 need to apply so that the materials for joint systems and penetrations equal the fire resistance rating of the assembly.



Section 8.4 and 8.8 do not address smoke resistive requirements for smoke barriers. Section 8.11 has more stringent requirements for smokebarrier penetrations.


191 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


20.3.4.5 Integrated Fire Protection Systems.

The commissioning of integrated fire protection systems shall be in accordance with 55.1.4 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision mandates application of the new 55.1.4, which addresses testing of integrated fire protection systems.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


25 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Harmeyer, Robert J.

Pethe, Ben

Affirmative All

Bush, Kenneth E.

Crowley, Michael A.

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Davy, Matthew W.

Epstein, Alice L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Furdell, Gary


Harris, Donald W.

Hood, David R.

Horeis, Richard M.

Koffel, William E.

Merrill II, James

Prediger, G. Brian

Rickard, John A.



192 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Schmitt, Dennis L.

Schultz, Terry



Worley, Fred


Gleason, Eric


Klein, David P.

The additional costs associated with this requirement have not been justified.


193 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


20.3.7.5.1

Any required smoke barrier shall have a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour, unless otherwise permitted by20.3.7.5.3 20.3.7.4.3 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Corrects cross-reference.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


25 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Harmeyer, Robert J.

Pethe, Ben

Affirmative All

Bush, Kenneth E.

Crowley, Michael A.

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Davy, Matthew W.

Epstein, Alice L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Furdell, Gary

Gleason, Eric

Harris, Donald W.

Hood, David R.

Horeis, Richard M.

Klein, David P.

Koffel, William E.

Merrill II, James

Prediger, G. Brian


194 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Rickard, John A.


Schmitt, Dennis L.

Schultz, Terry



Worley, Fred



Change of reference does not fix the problem. The “unless otherwise permitted by 20.3.7.5.3” should be moved to section 20.3.7.5 as itrelates to the construction of SMOKE barrier walls and not FIRE barrier wall requirements.


195 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


20.3.7.5.4

The requirements of 8.11.5.2 and 8.11.7.2 shall not apply.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Ambulatory health care smoke barriers must have a fire resistance rating. The fire barrier requirements of Section 8.4adequately restrict the passage of smoke.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


25 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Harmeyer, Robert J.

Pethe, Ben

Affirmative All

Bush, Kenneth E.

Crowley, Michael A.

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Davy, Matthew W.

Epstein, Alice L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Furdell, Gary

Gleason, Eric

Harris, Donald W.

Hood, David R.

Horeis, Richard M.

Klein, David P.

Koffel, William E.

Merrill II, James

Prediger, G. Brian


196 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Rickard, John A.


Schmitt, Dennis L.

Schultz, Terry



Worley, Fred



Section 8.4 and 8.8 do not address smoke resistive requirements for smoke barriers. Section 8.11 has more stringent requirements for smokebarrier penetrations.


197 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


21.1.1.6

Where construction, alteration, or demolition operations are conducted, the provisions of 4.5.5.4 shall apply.


Submitter Full Name: BLD-DET


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jul 28 15:44:42 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The committee wants to make sure that the provisions of NFPA 241 are followed during any construction or demolitionoperations. Renumber other sections accordingly.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


15 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

13 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Bondor, David L.

Affirmative All

Aler, Clay P.

Collins, Peter J.

DiMascio, Michael

Gaw, Randy

Heffernan, Rick

Kelly, John

Kruszelnicki, Michael

Lumley, Troy A.

Perry, Robert R.

Poole, Jack

Schultz, Terry

Stapleton, Jr., James A.

Zwirn, Jeffrey D.

Abstention

Bollig, Tracy


198 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

The committee wants to make sure that the provisions of NFPA 241 are followed during any construction or demolition operations. Renumberother sections accordingly.


199 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



Integrated fire protection systems shall be tested in accordance with Section 55.13 55.1.4 .


Submitter Full Name: BLD-DET


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jul 28 15:48:22 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This is an editorial change.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


15 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

13 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Bondor, David L.

Affirmative All

Aler, Clay P.

Collins, Peter J.

DiMascio, Michael

Gaw, Randy

Heffernan, Rick

Kelly, John

Kruszelnicki, Michael

Lumley, Troy A.

Perry, Robert R.

Poole, Jack

Schultz, Terry

Stapleton, Jr., James A.

Zwirn, Jeffrey D.



200 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Bollig, Tracy



201 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


22.2.4.8

Floor levels at doors in the primary means of escape shall comply with 11.2.1.3, unless otherwise permitted by one of the following:

(1) Where the door discharges to the outside or to an exterior exit access, an exterior landing with not more than a 7 in. (180 mm)drop below the door threshold and a minimum dimension of 36 in. (915 mm), or the width of the door leaf, whichever issmaller greater , shall be permitted.

(2) A door at the top of an interior stair shall be permitted to open directly at a stair, provided that the door does not swing over thestair and the door serves an area with an occupant load of fewer than 50 persons.


Submitter Full Name: BLD-RES


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

A door larger than 36 inches could have a 36 inch landing as this is currently written in the code. This would change theprovision to require the landing to be at least the width of the door. If the landing, as currently written, is less than the door,persons could egress from the building onto uneven ground because the landing is smaller. It could also require a person tostand off the landing to open the door to enter the building. This is a tripping hazard.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Boyd, H. Wayne

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.


202 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Hall, William J.

Isman, Kenneth E.

Klein, Marshall A.

Lambert, Josh

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Nickson, Ronald G.

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Versteeg, Joseph H.

Zubair Sarwar, Muhammad Ahmad

Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Weaver, Carl F.

Agree with proposal.



Absent the opportunity to vote negative on 22.2.8, I must vote negative on everything.

Spangler, Kevin

The code should read 36 inches or the width of the door.


203 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


22.2.8 Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.

22.2.8.1 General.

22.2.8.1.1

New bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and showers shall be provided with grab bars unless otherwise permitted by24.×.6.5.1.2.

22.2.8.1.2*


22.2.8.1.3

Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 22.2.8.2 through 22.2.8.4 .

22.2.8.1.4


22.2.8.2* Vertical Grab Bar or Pole.

A vertical grab bar shall be provided on the control end wall or the end wall opposite the control end wall of the bathtub or bathtub-shower combination in accordance with 22.2.8.2.1 or shall be provided as a vertical pole in accordance with 22.2.8.2.3 . Forshowers, either a vertical grab bar that is usable by a person stepping into and out of the shower enclosure in accordance with22.2.8.2.2 or a vertical pole in accordance with 22.2.8.2.3 shall be provided.

22.2.8.2.1* Bathtub End Wall Vertical Grab Bars.

End wall vertical grab bars for bathtubs shall comply with all the following:


(2) Vertical grab bars shall be located between 24 in. (610 mm) and 27 in. (686 mm) above the finished floor, measured to thelower end.

(3) Vertical grab bars shall be installed at the end that is least obstructed for entry and egress.

(4) Vertical grab bars shall be located between 9 in. (228 mm) and 12 in. (305 mm) from the open entry and egress side of thebathtub or bathtub-shower combination, measured horizontally from the exterior plane of the bathtub or bathtub-showercombination.

22.2.8.2.2 Shower Grab Bars.

Vertical grab bars for showers shall comply with all of the following:



22.2.8.2.3* Vertical Poles.

Vertical pole-type grab bars shall be fixed to the floor or to the bathtub and either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall and shallcomply with all the following:

(1) Poles shall be located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, of the outside or outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower.

(2) Poles shall be located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally, of the vertical plane of the control end wall of a bathtubor bathtub-shower combination.

22.2.8.3 Back Wall Grab Bar.

For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on two or three sides by walls, a diagonal grab bar in accordance with22.2.8.3.1 or horizontal grab bar in accordance with 22.2.8.3.2 shall be provided on the back wall.

22.2.8.3.1* Back Wall Diagonal Grab Bars.

Diagonal grab bars shall comply with all the following:



(3) Higher ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall.

(4) Higher ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located 25 in. (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (685 mm) maximum above the rim ofthe bathtub.

(5) Lower ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located 8 in. (203 mm) minimum and 10 in. (254 mm) maximum above the rim ofthe bathtub.


204 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

22.2.8.3.2 Back Wall Horizontal Grab Bar.

Horizontal grab bars shall comply with all the following:



22.2.8.4 Grab Bar Details.

22.2.8.4.1

Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1 1 ⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51mm).

22.2.8.4.2

Where attached to a wall, grab bars shall provide a clearance for hand grasp of 1 1 ⁄2 in. (38 mm) minimum.

22.2.8.4.3

Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with the building code.



22.2.4_grab_bars.docx Includes annex




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Aug 02 14:19:38 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The requirements for grab bars in homes were further refined from what was accepted in Chapter 7. Requirements for verticalgrab bars were revised. PC #173 outlines the background on the importance of bathroom grab bars for the prevention of falls.During the first draft meetings, fall prevention was added to the scope of NFPA 101.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Boyd, H. Wayne

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.


205 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Hall, William J.

Isman, Kenneth E.

Klein, Marshall A.

Lambert, Josh

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Nickson, Ronald G.

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Versteeg, Joseph H.


Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Lampella, Gary

Of concern is the statement that all “new” bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations and showers be provided with grab bars will includereplacements. These will be regulated by the plumbing code with no reference back to these sections. We also have concerns withreplacement (new) fixtures as there was committee discussion on retrofitting grab bars and the proponent mentioned a test for an epoxy/glueattachment in-lieu of the typical mechanical attachment to solid blocking/backing. We have reservations about promoting this type ofattachment. An epoxy/glue attachment is only as strong as the surface it is attached to, not just new construction. We would suggest maybeadding an explanatory note to 22.2.8.4.3 indicating epoxy/glue attachments may not meet the structural loading requirements and mechanicalattachment to solid blocking/backing is the preferred method. There is also the issue of the proposed vertical grab bars, especially those fromthe floor to the ceiling, which will be inviting for children to climb. This will more than likely lead to the unintended consequence of seriousinjuries due to the misuse of the grab bars in dwelling units. It is obvious that the ramifications of this major change to the nation’s livingspaces has not been fully vetted. We are not convinced that these devices should be regulated by the person enforcing this code, whichwould be the fire code official. We are also concerned about putting these requirements in the means of egress chapters while other activitiesin and around a bathroom are not specifically regulated. Such as, transferring from a chair to a wheelchair, getting on and off a bed and otherdaily functions that pose a safety risk to many persons. We think the issue of “new” tub/showers, retrofits and inserting the language in themeans of egress chapters should be addressed prior to insertion into the code.



Spangler, Kevin

Grab bars in showers are for fall protection, not for means of egress. Grab bars in one and two family dwellings are for personal preferenceand should not be mandated by NFPA 101. The information/documentation provided at the last meeting did not have substantial technicalinformation that indicated that the falls that were referenced were in one or two family dwellings. At a minimum, section 24.2.8.1.2 should bein when the floor does not exceed 6 inches in height. A six inch curb has not proven to be a fall hazard in any of the documentation provided.

Weaver, Carl F.

I do not agree with the proposed change as the cost to install grab bars exceeds the cost benefit of installing them. Current federal law andbuilding codes require the installation of blocking for the owner to install grab bars at their discretion.


206 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

22.2.8 * Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.

22.2.8.1 General

22.2.8.1.1 New bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and showers shall be provided with grab bars unless otherwise permitted by 24.X.6.5.1.2.

22.2.8.1.2* Grab bars shall not be required in showers where the transition from the room floor to the shower floor does not exceed 0.5 in. (13 mm) in height and all shower surfaces are slip resistant when wet.

22.2.8.1.3 Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 22.2.8.2 through 22.2.8.4.

22.2.8.1.4 All dimensions shall be measured to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stated.

22.2.8.2* Vertical Grab Bar or Pole. A vertical grab bar shall be provided on the control end wall or the end wall opposite the control end wall of the bathtub or bathtub-shower combination in accordance with 22.2.8.2.1, or shall be provided as a vertical pole in accordance with 22.2.8.2.3. For showers, either a vertical grab bar that is usable by a person stepping into and out of the shower enclosure in accordance with 22.2.8.2.2, or a vertical pole in accordance with 22.2.8.2.3, shall be provided.

22.2.8.2.1* Bathtub End Wall Vertical Grab Bars. End wall vertical grab bars for bathtubs shall comply with all of the following:

1. Vertical grab bars shall have a length of not less than 36 in. (914 mm).

2. Vertical grab bars shall be located between 24 in. (610 mm) and 27 in. (686 mm) above the finished floor, measured to the lower end.

3. Vertical grab bars shall be installed at the end that is least obstructed for entry and egress.

4. Vertical grab bars shall be located between 9 in. (228 mm) and 12 in. (305 mm) from the open entry and egress side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, measured horizontally from the exterior plane of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination.

22.2.8.2.2 Shower Grab Bars. Vertical grab bars for showers shall comply with all of the following:



22.2.8.2.3* Vertical Poles. Vertical, pole-type grabs bar shall be fixed to the floor or to the bathtub and either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall and shall comply with all of the following:

1. Poles shall be located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, of the outside or outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower.

of 391

2. Poles shall be located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally, of the vertical plane of the control end wall of a bathtub or bathtub-shower combination.

22.2.8.3 Back Wall Grab Bar. For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on two or three sides by walls, a diagonal grab bar in accordance with 22.2.8.3.1 or horizontal grab bar in accordance with 22.2.8.3.2 shall be provided on the back wall.

22.2.8.3.1* Back Wall Diagonal Grab Bars. Diagonal grab bars shall comply with all of the following:

1. Diagonal grab bars shall have a length of not less than 24 in. (600 mm).

2. Diagonal grab bars shall be located so the higher end is closest to the control end wall.

3. Higher ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall.

4. Higher ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located 25 in. (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (685 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub.

5. Lower ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located 8 in. (203 mm) minimum and 10 in. (254 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub.

22.2.8.3.2 Back Wall Horizontal Grab Bar. Horizontal grab bars shall comply with all of the following:

1. Horizontal grab bars shall be located 8 in. (205 mm) minimum and 10 in. (255 mm) maximum above the bathtub rim.

2. Horizontal grab bars shall be located so one end is 12 in. (305 mm) maximum from the control end wall and the other end is located 24 in. (610 mm) maximum from the opposite, or head, end of the bathtub.

22.2.8.4* Grab Bar Details.

22.2.8.4.1 Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1 1⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm).

22.2.8.4.2 Where attached to a wall, grab bars shall provide a clearance for hand grasp of 1 1⁄2 in. (38 mm) minimum.

22.2.8.4.3 Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with the building code.

A.22.2.8.5 See A.7.1.6.5. 22.2.8.2 The requirements within this section provide design options for points of control when entering and/or exiting a bathtub or shower. Points of control are critical to providing guidance and stability to an occupant much the same as a handrail provides on stairs. The different points of control specified by this section, wall mounted grabs or

of 391

vertical poles, provide options for compliance in a wide range of conditions. It is important to note that only one point of control is required for entry and egress transfers. The use of a vertical pole is not required and is offered as an option to wall mounted grab bars. A.22.2.8.1.2 See A.7.1.6.5.1.2 A.22.2.8.2.1 See A.7.1.6.5.2.1 A.22.2.8.2.3 See A.7.1.6.5.2.2 A.22.2.8.3.1 See A.7.1.6.5.3.1 A.22.2.8.5.4 See A.7.1.6.5.4 L&R : 22.2.8 5000 1&2: 22.2.8 5000 L&R: 23.2.4 Statement:

of 391


23.2.4 Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.

23.2.4.1 General.

23.2.4.1.1

New bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and showers shall be provided with grab bars unless otherwise permitted by24.×.6.5.1.2.

23.2.4.1.2*


23.2.4.1.3

Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 23.2.4.2 through 23.2.4.4 .

23.2.4.1.4


23.2.4.2* Vertical Grab Bar or Pole.

A vertical grab bar shall be provided on the control end wall or the end wall opposite the control end wall of the bathtub or bathtub-shower combination in accordance with 23.2.4.2.1 or shall be provided as a vertical pole in accordance with 23.2.4.2.3 . Forshowers, either a vertical grab bar that is usable by a person stepping into and out of the shower enclosure in accordance with23.2.4.2.2 or a vertical pole in accordance with 23.2.4.2.3 shall be provided.

23.2.4.2.1* Bathtub End Wall Vertical Grab Bars.

End wall vertical grab bars for bathtubs shall comply with all the following:



(3) Vertical grab bars shall be installed at the end that is least obstructed for entry and egress.

(4) Vertical grab bars shall be located between 9 in. (228 mm) and 12 in. (305 mm) from the open entry and egress side of thebathtub or bathtub-shower combination, measured horizontally from the exterior plane of the bathtub or bathtub-showercombination.

23.2.4.2.2 Shower Grab Bars.

Vertical grab bars for showers shall comply with all the following:



23.2.4.2.3* Vertical Poles.

Vertical pole-type grab bars shall be fixed to the floor or to the bathtub and either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall and shallcomply with all the following:

(1) Poles shall be located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, of the outside or outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower.

(2) Poles shall be located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally, of the vertical plane of the control end wall of a bathtubor bathtub-shower combination.

23.2.4.3 Back Wall Grab Bar.

For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on two or three sides by walls, a diagonal grab bar in accordance with23.2.4.3.1 or horizontal grab bar in accordance with 23.2.4.3.2 shall be provided on the back wall.

23.2.4.3.1* Back Wall Diagonal Grab Bars.

Diagonal grab bars shall comply with all the following:



(3) Higher ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall.

(4) Higher ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located 25 in. (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (685 mm) maximum above the rim ofthe bathtub.

(5) Lower ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located 8 in. (203 mm) minimum and 10 in. (254 mm) maximum above the rim ofthe bathtub.


207 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

23.2.4.3.2 Back Wall Horizontal Grab Bars.

Horizontal grab bars shall comply with all the following:



23.2.4.4 Grab Bar Details.

23.2.4.4.1

Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1 1 ⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51mm).

23.2.4.4.2

Where attached to a wall, grab bars shall provide a clearance for hand grasp of 1 1 ⁄2 in. (38 mm) minimum.

23.2.4.4.3

Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with the building code.



23.2.4_grab_bars.docx Includes annex




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The requirements for grab bars in homes were further refined from what was accepted in Chapter 7. Requirements for verticalgrab bars were revised. PC #173 outlines the background on the importance of bathroom grab bars for the prevention of falls.During the first draft meetings, fall prevention was added to the scope of NFPA 101.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Boyd, H. Wayne

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All


208 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Asp, Roland A.

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Hall, William J.

Isman, Kenneth E.

Klein, Marshall A.

Lambert, Josh

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Nickson, Ronald G.

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Versteeg, Joseph H.


Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Lampella, Gary

Of concern is the statement that all “new” bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations and showers be provided with grab bars will includereplacements. These will be regulated by the plumbing code with no reference back to these sections. We also have concerns withreplacement (new) fixtures as there was committee discussion on retrofitting grab bars and the proponent mentioned a test for an epoxy/glueattachment in-lieu of the typical mechanical attachment to solid blocking/backing. We have reservations about promoting this type ofattachment. An epoxy/glue attachment is only as strong as the surface it is attached to, not just new construction. We would suggest maybeadding an explanatory note to 23.2.3.6 indicating epoxy/glue attachments may not meet the structural loading requirements and mechanicalattachment to solid blocking/backing is the preferred method. There is also the issue of the proposed vertical grab bars, especially those fromthe floor to the ceiling, which will be inviting for children to climb. This will more than likely lead to the unintended consequence of seriousinjuries due to the misuse of the grab bars in dwelling units. It is obvious that the ramifications of this major change to the nation’s livingspaces has not been fully vetted. We are not convinced that these devices should be regulated by the person enforcing this code, whichwould be the fire code official. We are also concerned about putting these requirements in the means of egress chapters while other activitiesin and around a bathroom are not specifically regulated. Such as, transferring from a chair to a wheelchair, getting on and off a bed and otherdaily functions that pose a safety risk to many persons. We think the issue of “new” tub/showers, retrofits and inserting the language in themeans of egress chapters should be addressed prior to insertion into the code.



Spangler, Kevin

Grab bars in showers are for fall protection, not for means of egress. The information/documentation provided at the last meeting did nothave substantial technical information that indicated that the addition of grab bars would reduce the indicated falls. At a minimum, section23.2.4.1.2 should be in when the floor does not exceed 6 inches in height. A six inch curb has not proven to be a fall hazard in any of thedocumentation provided.

Weaver, Carl F.

I do not agree with the proposed change as the cost to install grab bars exceeds the cost benefit of installing them. Current federal law andbuilding codes require the installation of blocking for the owner to install grab bars at their discretion.


209 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

23.2.4 * Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.

23.2.4.1 General

23.2.4.1.1 New bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and showers shall be provided with grab bars unless otherwise permitted by 24.X.6.5.1.2.

23.2.4.1.2* Grab bars shall not be required in showers where the transition from the room floor to the shower floor does not exceed 0.5 in. (13 mm) in height and all shower surfaces are slip resistant when wet.

23.2.4.1.3 Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 23.2.4.2 through 23.2.4.4.

23.2.4.1.4 All dimensions shall be measured to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stated.

23.2.4.2* Vertical Grab Bar or Pole. A vertical grab bar shall be provided on the control end wall or the end wall opposite the control end wall of the bathtub or bathtub-shower combination in accordance with 23.2.4.2.1, or shall be provided as a vertical pole in accordance with 23.2.4.2.3. For showers, either a vertical grab bar that is usable by a person stepping into and out of the shower enclosure in accordance with 23.2.4.2.2, or a vertical pole in accordance with 23.2.4.2.3, shall be provided.

23.2.4.2.1* Bathtub End Wall Vertical Grab Bars. End wall vertical grab bars for bathtubs shall comply with all of the following:



3. Vertical grab bars shall be installed at the end that is least obstructed for entry and egress.

4. Vertical grab bars shall be located between 9 in. (228 mm) and 12 in. (305 mm) from the open entry and egress side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, measured horizontally from the exterior plane of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination.

23.2.4.2.2 Shower Grab Bars. Vertical grab bars for showers shall comply with all of the following:



23.2.4.2.3* Vertical Poles. Vertical, pole-type grabs bar shall be fixed to the floor or to the bathtub and either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall and shall comply with all of the following:

1. Poles shall be located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, of the outside or outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower.

of 391

2. Poles shall be located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally, of the vertical plane of the control end wall of a bathtub or bathtub-shower combination.

23.2.4.3 Back Wall Grab Bar. For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on two or three sides by walls, a diagonal grab bar in accordance with 23.2.4.3.1 or horizontal grab bar in accordance with 23.2.4.3.2 shall be provided on the back wall.

23.2.4.3.1* Back Wall Diagonal Grab Bars. Diagonal grab bars shall comply with all of the following:

1. Diagonal grab bars shall have a length of not less than 24 in. (600 mm).

2. Diagonal grab bars shall be located so the higher end is closest to the control end wall.

3. Higher ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall.

4. Higher ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located 25 in. (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (685 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub.

5. Lower ends of diagonal grab bars shall be located 8 in. (203 mm) minimum and 10 in. (254 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub.

23.2.4.3.2 Back Wall Horizontal Grab Bar. Horizontal grab bars shall comply with all of the following:

1. Horizontal grab bars shall be located 8 in. (205 mm) minimum and 10 in. (255 mm) maximum above the bathtub rim.

2. Horizontal grab bars shall be located so one end is 12 in. (305 mm) maximum from the control end wall and the other end is located 24 in. (610 mm) maximum from the opposite, or head, end of the bathtub.

23.2.4.4* Grab Bar Details.

23.2.4.4.1 Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1 1⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm).

23.2.4.4.2 Where attached to a wall, grab bars shall provide a clearance for hand grasp of 1 1⁄2 in. (38 mm) minimum.

23.2.4.4.3 Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with the building code.

A.23.2.4.5 See A.7.1.6.5. 23.2.4.2 The requirements within this section provide design options for points of control when entering and/or exiting a bathtub or shower. Points of control are critical to providing guidance and stability to an occupant much the same as a handrail provides on stairs. The different points of control specified by this section, wall mounted grabs or

of 391

vertical poles, provide options for compliance in a wide range of conditions. It is important to note that only one point of control is required for entry and egress transfers. The use of a vertical pole is not required and is offered as an option to wall mounted grab bars. A.23.2.4.1.2 See A.7.1.6.5.1.2 A.23.2.4.2.1 See A.7.1.6.5.2.1 A.23.2.4.2.3 See A.7.1.6.5.2.2 A.23.2.4.3.1 See A.7.1.6.5.3.1 A.23.2.4.5.4 See A.7.1.6.5.4 L&R : 23.2.4 5000 1&2: 23.2.4 5000 L&R: 23.2.4 Statement:

of 391


24.3.4.8 Risk Analysis for Mass Notification.

24.3.4.8.1

A risk analysis for mass notification in accordance with Section 55.13 shall be conducted for K through 12, college, or universitydormitories with an occupant load greater than 100.

24.3.4.8.2

Applicable portions of an existing risk analysis shall be permitted to be used when a new building is added to the campus.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This new language will require a risk analysis for mass notification in dormitories used in conjunction with K-12, college, oruniversity dormitories. Details on the risk analysis are found in Section 55.13 and NFPA 72. This SR is in response to CI7004 and PC 16.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Boyd, H. Wayne

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


210 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hall, William J.

Isman, Kenneth E.

Klein, Marshall A.

Lambert, Josh

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Nickson, Ronald G.

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Versteeg, Joseph H.


Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Weaver, Carl F.

Agree with the proposal.




Spangler, Kevin

Mass notification report should not be mandated by code. The addition of a mass notification system is based on owner preference. It shouldnot be mandated to require the owner to incur unnecessary costs for a report in which they have ultimate say in whether or not the system isrequired. As a consulting engineer that would be hired to perform this analysis, I would estimate that the incurred cost by the client would beat least $6,000, but more likely around or over $10,000.


211 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


24.3.4.11.3*

Where fuel-burning appliances or fuel-burning fireplaces are installed outside guest rooms or guest suites, carbon monoxide alarmsor carbon monoxide detectors monoxide detectors shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s published instructions inall of the following locations:

(1) On the ceilings of rooms containing permanently installed fuel-burning appliances or fuel-burning fireplaces

(2) In a centrally located position within occupiable spaces served by the first supply air register from a permanently installed,fuel-burning HVAC system

(3) In a centrally located position within occupiable spaces adjacent to a communicating attached garage

24.3.4.11.4

Where carbon monoxide detectors are installed in accordance with 24.3.4.11.3(1) , the alarm signal shall be automaticallytransmitted to an approved onsite location or to an off-premises location in accordance with NFPA 720 .



annex_to_24.3.4.10.3_5000_CO_detectors.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Requiring only CO detectors to be installed in these locations will:

1. Enhance public life safety by notifying a responsible party of a malfunctioning fuel–burning appliance installed in anormally unoccupied location

2. Clarify the locations where CO alarms can be installed in accordance with their ANSI/UL2034 listings, which is only inordinary indoor locations of dwelling units not in commercial occupancies.

Accepting this change will adequately address on-site notification of a carbon monoxide incident by utilizing the intendedequipment for normally unoccupied locations.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned


212 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Boyd, H. Wayne

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Hall, William J.

Isman, Kenneth E.

Klein, Marshall A.

Lambert, Josh

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Nickson, Ronald G.

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Spangler, Kevin

Versteeg, Joseph H.


Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Weaver, Carl F.






213 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.24.3.4.10.3 Where fuel‐burning appliances or fuel‐burning fireplaces are located outside but attached to the dwelling unit, the area or room containing the fuel‐burning appliance or fuel‐burning fireplace may be considered part of the attached dwelling unit(s). In this application either a carbon monoxide alarms or carbon monoxide detectors are permitted to be installed in the attached dwelling unit(s) in accordance with 25.3.4.6.1.

1.

of 391


24.3.5.4

Where an automatic sprinkler system is installed, either for total or partial building coverage, the system shall be in accordance withSection 55.3, as modified by 24.3.5.5. In buildings hotel or dormitory occupancies up to and including four or fewer stories in heightand that are located in buildings not exceeding 60 ft (18.3 m) in height above grade plane, systems in accordance with NFPA 13Rshall be permitted.

24.3.5.4.1

Where located in a building of Type III, Type IV, or Type V construction designed in accordance with 7.4.3.6.5 , where the roofassembly is located more than 55 ft (16.76 m) above the lowest level of required fire department vehicle access, attics shallcomply with 24.3.5.4.1.1 , 24.3.5.4.1.2 , and one of the following:

(1) Attics shall be provided with sprinkler protection.

(2) Attics shall be constructed with noncombustible materials.

(3) Attics shall be constructed with fire-retardant-treated wood.

(4) Attics shall be filled with noncombustible insulation.

24.3.5.4.1.1

The height of the roof assembly shall be determined by measuring the distance from the lowest level of required fire departmentvehicle access adjacent to the building to the eave of the highest pitched roof, the intersection of the highest roof to the exteriorwall, or the top of the highest parapet, whichever yields the greatest distance.

24.3.5.4.1.2

Required fire department vehicle access roads used in 24.3.5.4.1.1 shall include only those roads that are necessary forrequired fire department vehicle access in compliance with the fire code.



24.3.5.4_5000_attics.docx For staff use




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Based on the discussions and conclusions at the NFPA Workshop on NFPA 13R that took place in Orlando on December 15-16,2016, this code proposal came out of that Workshop as a response to fire service concerns about suppressing a f ire involving atall pedestal building attic.

Under this code proposal, such attic or attics will be required to have increased f ire protection. Pedestal buildings that exceed 4stories above grade plane, including the pedestal, are anticipated to be affected by this proposal, as would be some pedestalbuildings with fewer stories that are located on sloped lots with fire department access roads required along a lower elevationportion of the perimeter. The intent of stating "required" fire department access road is to make it clear that, simply becauseaccess is available on an adjacent road or parking lot, that road need not be considered in the height measurement unless it isrequired as part of satisfying the code requirement for fire department vehicle access to the building.

Note that allowances to use noncombustible construction materials, f ire-retardant treated wood, and filling with noncombustibleinsulation are already permitted by NFPA 13 as an alternative to installing sprinklers in concealed spaces in otherwise fully-sprinklered buildings. These allowances are duplicated in the proposed text so that an architect or developer can identify theattic protection concern and permissible solutions early in the design process, as opposed to expecting building designers toknow of these allowances buried deep in the text of NFPA 13. Having the exceptions in the this text w ill make it clear that theseNFPA 13 exceptions are appropriate for NFPA 13R attic protection as well, even though they are not included in NFPA 13R(because NFPA 13R doesn't ordinarily require attics to be protected).

This code proposal is intended to be identical to the IFC Code Proposal F172-16 that was submitted for the 2018 ICC Group B


214 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Code Development Cycle. Those IFC hearings were in Louisville KY from April 17-20, 2016. F172-16 was approved by the IFCCode Development Committee on April 18, 2016.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Boyd, H. Wayne

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Hall, William J.

Isman, Kenneth E.

Klein, Marshall A.

Lambert, Josh

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Nickson, Ronald G.

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Spangler, Kevin

Versteeg, Joseph H.


Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Weaver, Carl F.




215 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391




216 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



Integrated fire protection systems shall be tested in accordance with 55.1.4.2 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision incorporates the new 55.1.4.2 integrated system testing requirements. This action is in response to CINo. 6027.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Boyd, H. Wayne

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Hall, William J.

Lambert, Josh

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Nickson, Ronald G.


217 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Versteeg, Joseph H.


Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Weaver, Carl F.



Asp, Roland A.


Isman, Kenneth E.

A wet pipe or dry pipe sprinkler system with the waterflow switch set up as an initiating device for the alarm system meets the definition of an“integrated system”, but should not have to be tested as an integrated system. The integrated system testing is more expensive than theindividual testing of the sprinkler and alarm systems and is not justified. If the link between the sprinkler system and the alarm system fails forsome reason, the sprinkler system can still do its job. The alarm system is not preventing the sprinkler system from functioning, so there is noreason to require them to be tested together. I can see how a preaction sprinkler system would need to be tested with the alarm system in anintegrated fashion. If the alarm system does not work, then the sprinkler system won’t operate properly. But for a regular wet pipe or dry pipesprinkler system, that does not rely on the alarm system for operational purposes, causing the sprinkler system to be tested as an integratedsystem just because it is tied to the alarm system is too much.

Klein, Marshall A.

I agree with the negative ballots of Ken Isman and Roland ASP on this Second Revision proposal.



Spangler, Kevin

See Kenneth Isman comments.


218 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


25.3.4.6.3*

Where fuel-burning appliances or fuel- burning fireplaces are installed outside dwelling units, carbon monoxide alarms or carbonmonoxide detectors carbon monoxide detectors shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s published instructions in allof the following locations:

(1) On the ceilings of rooms containing permanently installed fuel-burning appliances or fuel-burning fireplaces

(2) In a centrally located position within occupiable spaces served by the first supply air register from a permanently installed,fuel-burning HVAC system

(3) In a centrally located position within occupiable spaces adjacent to a communicating attached garage

25.3.4.6.4

Where carbon monoxide detectors are installed in accordance with 24.3.4.11.3(1) , the alarm signal shall be automaticallytransmitted to an approved onsite location or to an off-premises location in accordance with NFPA 720 .



annex_to_25.3.4.6.3_5000_CO_detectors.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Requiring only CO detectors to be installed in these locations will:

1. Enhance public life safety by notifying a responsible party of a malfunctioning fuel-burning appliance installed in anormally unoccupied location.

2. Clarify the locations where CO alarms can be installed in accordance with their ANSI/UL2034 listings, which is only inordinary indoor locations of dwelling units not in commercial occupancies.

Accepting this change will adequately address on-site notification of a carbon monoxide incident by utilizing the intendedequipment for normally unoccupied locations.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Boyd, H. Wayne


219 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Hall, William J.

Isman, Kenneth E.

Klein, Marshall A.

Lambert, Josh

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Nickson, Ronald G.

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Spangler, Kevin

Versteeg, Joseph H.


Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Weaver, Carl F.






220 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.25.3.4.6.3 Where fuel‐burning appliances or fuel‐burning fireplaces are located outside but attached to the dwelling unit, the area or room containing the fuel‐burning appliance or fuel‐burning fireplace may be considered part of the attached dwelling unit(s). In this application either a carbon monoxide alarms or carbon monoxide detectors are permitted to be installed in the attached dwelling unit(s) in accordance with 25.3.4.6.1.

of 391


25.3.5.3

Where an automatic sprinkler system is installed, either for total or partial building coverage, the system shall be installed inaccordance with Section 55.3, as modified by 25.3.5.4 through 25.3.5.7 . In buildings hotel or dormitory occupancies up to andincluding four or fewer stories in heightand that are located in buildings not exceeding 60 ft (18.3 m) in height above grade plane,systems in accordance with NFPA 13R shall be permitted.

25.3.5.3.1

Where located in a building of Type III, Type IV, or Type V construction designed in accordance with 7.4.3.6.5 , or 7.4.3.6.7.1 ,where the roof assembly is located more than 55 ft (16.76 m) above the lowest level of required fire department vehicle access,attics shall comply with 25.3.5.3.1.1 , 25.3.5.3.1.2 , and one of the following:

(1) Attics shall be provided with sprinkler protection.

(2) Attics shall be constructed with noncombustible materials.

(3) Attics shall be constructed with fire-retardant-treated wood.

(4) Attics shall be filled with noncombustible insulation.

25.3.5.3.1.1

The height of the roof assembly shall be determined by measuring the distance from the lowest level of required fire departmentvehicle access adjacent to the building to the eave of the highest pitched roof, the intersection of the highest roof to the exteriorwall, or the top of the highest parapet, whichever yields the greatest distance.

25.3.5.3.1.2

Required fire department vehicle access roads used in 25.3.5.3.1.1 shall include only those roads that are necessary forrequired fire department vehicle access in compliance with the fire code.



25.3.5.3_attics.docx For staff use




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Based on the discussions and conclusions at the NFPA Workshop on NFPA 13R that took place in Orlando on December 15-16,2016, this code proposal came out of that Workshop as a response to fire service concerns about suppressing a f ire involving atall pedestal building attic.

Under this code proposal, such attic or attics will be required to have increased f ire protection. Pedestal buildings that exceed 4stories above grade plane, including the pedestal, are anticipated to be affected by this proposal, as would be some pedestalbuildings with fewer stories that are located on sloped lots with fire department access roads required along a lower elevationportion of the perimeter. The intent of stating "required" fire department access road is to make it clear that, simply becauseaccess is available on an adjacent road or parking lot, that road need not be considered in the height measurement unless it isrequired as part of satisfying the code requirement for fire department vehicle access to the building.

Note that allowances to use noncombustible construction materials, f ire-retardant treated wood, and filling with noncombustibleinsulation are already permitted by NFPA 13 as an alternative to installing sprinklers in concealed spaces in otherwise fully-sprinklered buildings. These allowances are duplicated in the proposed text so that an architect or developer can identify theattic protection concern and permissible solutions early in the design process, as opposed to expecting building designers toknow of these allowances buried deep in the text of NFPA 13. Having the exceptions in the this text w ill make it clear that theseNFPA 13 exceptions are appropriate for NFPA 13R attic protection as well, even though they are not included in NFPA 13R(because NFPA 13R doesn't ordinarily require attics to be protected).

This code proposal is intended to be identical to the IFC Code Proposal F172-16 that was submitted for the 2018 ICC Group B


221 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Code Development Cycle. Those IFC hearings were in Louisville KY from April 17-20, 2016. F172-16 was approved by the IFCCode Development Committee on April 18, 2016.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Boyd, H. Wayne

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Hall, William J.

Isman, Kenneth E.

Lambert, Josh

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Spangler, Kevin

Versteeg, Joseph H.


Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Klein, Marshall A.

Staff copied the type of occupancies from SR-7006 into this SR-7007 new Section 25.3.5.3 without changing them from "...hotel anddormitory occupancies..." to "...apartment occupancies...". This is a staff error and needs to be corrected because Chapter 25 covers therequirements for new apartments (SR-7007) and Chapter 24 is for new hotels and dormitory occupancies. This was strictly a "copy and paste"error by Staff at the Second Draft Meeting since it was the Committee's intent to apply this requirement to the occupancies covered inChapters 24 and 25. This same mistake was also made in the NFPA 101 ballot for SR-6013 and also needs to be corrected.

Nickson, Ronald G.


222 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

When SR7006 was copied into SR-7007 the terms "...hotel and dormitory occupancies... was not changed to "...apartment occupancies...".

Weaver, Carl F.






223 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391



Integrated fire protection systems in high-rise buildings shall be tested in accordance with 55.1.4.2 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision incorporates the new 55.1.4.2 integrated system testing requirements. This action is in response to CINo. 6028.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

5 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Boyd, H. Wayne

Damron, Donald P.


Meehan, Michael F.

Sharry, John A.

Affirmative All

Boyer, Patrick

Bradley, Harry L.

Coats, Paul D.

Cronin, Bradford T.

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Hall, William J.

Lambert, Josh

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.

Mayl, Eric N.

Nickson, Ronald G.


224 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Paszczuk, Henry

Pauls, Jake


Versteeg, Joseph H.


Zwirn, Jeffrey D.


Weaver, Carl F.



Asp, Roland A.


Isman, Kenneth E.

A wet pipe or dry pipe sprinkler system with the waterflow switch set up as an initiating device for the alarm system meets the definition of an“integrated system”, but should not have to be tested as an integrated system. The integrated system testing is more expensive than theindividual testing of the sprinkler and alarm systems and is not justified. If the link between the sprinkler system and the alarm system fails forsome reason, the sprinkler system can still do its job. The alarm system is not preventing the sprinkler system from functioning, so there is noreason to require them to be tested together. I can see how a preaction sprinkler system would need to be tested with the alarm system in anintegrated fashion. If the alarm system does not work, then the sprinkler system won’t operate properly. But for a regular wet pipe or dry pipesprinkler system, that does not rely on the alarm system for operational purposes, causing the sprinkler system to be tested as an integratedsystem just because it is tied to the alarm system is too much, even in high rise buildings.

Klein, Marshall A.

I agree with the negative ballots of Ken Isman and Roland ASP on this Second Revision proosal.



Spangler, Kevin

See Kenneth Isman comments.


225 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


26.2.2.2.1

Sleeping rooms, other than those complying with 26.2.2.2.2 or 26.2.2.2.3, and living areas in facilities without a sprinkler systeminstalled in accordance with 26.2.3.5 shall have a second means of escape consisting of one of the following:

(1) Door, stairway, passage, or hall providing a way of unobstructed travel to the outside of the dwelling at street or the finishedground level that is independent of, and remotely located from, the primary means of escape

(2) Passage through an adjacent, nonlockable space, independent of, and remotely located from, the primary means of escape, toany approved means of escape

(3)

(4) Window Windows having a sill height below the adjacent finished ground level that is are provided with a window well meetingthe following criteria:

(a) The window well has horizontal dimensions that allow the window to be fully opened.

(b) The window well has an accessible net clear opening of not less than 9 ft 2 (0.84 m 2 ), with a length and width of not lessthan 36 in. (915 mm).

(c) A window well with a vertical depth of more than 44 in. (1120 mm) is equipped with an approved permanently affixed ladderor with steps meeting the following criteria:

i. The ladder or steps do not encroach more than 6 in. (150 mm) into the required dimensions of the window well.

ii. The ladder or steps are not obstructed by the window.

(d) Ladders or steps that comply with the requirements of 26.2.2.2.1(4)(c)i.26.2.2 and 26.2.2.2.1(4)(c)ii. are exempt from therequirements of 11.2.2.



window_well.docx For staff use


Submitter Full Name: BLD-BCF


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jul 19 15:36:18 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Editorial revision to make the section match what is in NFPA 101. Without making this change, the section isincorrect.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

* Outside window or door that is operable from the inside, without the use of tools, keys, or special effort, and that provides a

clear opening of not less than 5.7 ft2 (0.53 m2), with the width not less than 20 in. (510 mm), the height not less than 24 in. (610mm), and the bottom of the opening not more than 44 in. (1120 mm) above the floor, where one of the following criteria also ismet:

(a) The window is within 20 ft (6100 mm) of the finished ground level.

(b) The window is directly accessible to fire department rescue apparatus, as approved by the AHJ.

(c) The window or door opens onto an exterior balcony.


226 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Allen, Scott D.

Jones, Adam C.

Mills, David E.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Beebe, Chad E.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bradley, Harry L.

Day, Richard L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Jose, Philip R.

Kowalenko, Henry

Larrimer, Peter A.

McDermott, Randy S.

Pacholzuk, Gayanne Coral

Rierson, Carter J.

Rosenbaum, Eric R.

Schultz, Terry

Talley, Joshua

Taluba, Jon

Utiskul, Yunyong Pock

Worley, Fred


Rickard, John A.

This change references 26.2.2.1(4)(c)(a) and (b) instead of 26.2.2.1(4)(c)(i) and (ii). The reference needs to be corrected before this changeis adopted.


227 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


26.3.3.3.2 Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish.

Interior wall and ceiling finish materials complying with Chapter 10 shall be in accordance with the following:

(1) Exit enclosures — Class A

(2) Lobbies and corridors — Class A or Class B

(3) Rooms and enclosed spaces — Class A or Class B




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Correlation with NFPA 101 requirements. If Class B is permitted, Class A is also permitted.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Allen, Scott D.

Jones, Adam C.

Mills, David E.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Beebe, Chad E.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bradley, Harry L.

Day, Richard L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Jose, Philip R.

Kowalenko, Henry

Larrimer, Peter A.

McDermott, Randy S.


Rickard, John A.


228 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Rierson, Carter J.

Rosenbaum, Eric R.

Schultz, Terry

Talley, Joshua

Taluba, Jon


Worley, Fred


229 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


26.3.3.6.2*

Sleeping rooms shall be separated from all spaces, other than adjacent sleeping rooms adjacent bathrooms, or lounge areas , andbathrooms directly accessible from the sleeping rooms, by walls complying with 26.3.3.6.3 through 26.3.3.6.6.



26.3.3.6.2_BCF_separation_living_spaces.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The change incorporates the comments raised during the FR ballot, as raised by the CC Note 37. The annex noteclarifies the intent of this requirement.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Allen, Scott D.

Jones, Adam C.

Mills, David E.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Beebe, Chad E.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bradley, Harry L.

Day, Richard L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Jose, Philip R.

Kowalenko, Henry


230 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Larrimer, Peter A.

McDermott, Randy S.


Rierson, Carter J.

Rosenbaum, Eric R.

Schultz, Terry

Talley, Joshua

Taluba, Jon


Worley, Fred


Rickard, John A.

This change removes "lounge areas" from the text but this language remains in the annex note. The code text needs to clearly indicatewhether lounge/living areas within the sleeping suite must be separated from the sleeping area.


231 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.26.3.3.6.2 The purpose of this requirement is to protect sleeping rooms from a fire that occurs in an area that is outside of the sleeping room or suite of sleeping rooms such as corridors, Housekeeping Closets, IT Rooms, Electrical/Mechanical Rooms, Libraries, Offices, Conference Rooms, Quiet Rooms and Medication Rooms, Washer/Dryer Rooms, Common Work Rooms, Common Lounges, and Common Bathrooms. Lounges and Bathrooms that can only be accessed directly from the sleeping room or suite of sleeping rooms may be considered part of the sleeping room or suite enclosure and therefore those rooms only should meet the requirements of 26.3.3.6.3 through 26.3.3.6.6 where those room walls either abut a corridor or abut a room other than a sleeping room.

of 391


26.3.3.8.2*

Where residential cooking equipment is used for food warming or limited cooking or where the equipment has heating elements orburners have been tested and listed to not allow cooking pan temperatures to exceed 662°F (350°C), the equipment shall not berequired to be protected in accordance with Section 55.10, and the presence of the equipment shall not require the area to beprotected as a hazardous area where the heating elements or burners have been tested and listed to not allow cooking pantemperatures to exceed 662°F (350°C) .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Revised the location of the burner/heating element temperature to prevent the overheating of cooking oil.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Allen, Scott D.

Jones, Adam C.

Mills, David E.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Beebe, Chad E.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bradley, Harry L.

Day, Richard L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Jose, Philip R.

Kowalenko, Henry

Larrimer, Peter A.

McDermott, Randy S.



232 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Rickard, John A.

Rierson, Carter J.

Rosenbaum, Eric R.

Schultz, Terry

Talley, Joshua

Taluba, Jon


Worley, Fred


233 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


26.3.3.8.3*

Compliance with Section 55.10 shall not be required where all of the following conditions are met:

(1) Residential or commercial cooking equipment in a single kitchen per smoke compartment is used to prepare meals for 30 orfewer persons.

(2) The portion of the board and care facility served by the cooking facility is limited to 30 beds and is separated from other portionsof the board and care facility by a smoke barrier constructed in accordance with 26.3.3.7.9 and 26.3.3.7.14 through26.3.3.7.22.

(3) The cooktop or range is equipped with a range hood of a width at least equal to the width of the cooking surface, with greasebaffles or other grease-collecting and clean-out capability.

(4)

(5) The hood systems that are not ducted to the exterior additionally have a charcoal filter to remove smoke and odor.

(6) The cooktop or range complies with all of the following:

(a) The cooktop or range is protected with a fire suppression system listed in accordance with UL 300, Standard for FireTesting of Fire Extinguishing Systems for Protection of Commercial Cooking Equipment, or is tested and meets allrequirements of UL 300A, Extinguishing System Units for Residential Range Top Cooking Surfaces, in accordance with theapplicable testing document's scope.

(b) A manual release of the extinguishing system is provided in accordance with Section 10.5 of NFPA 96.

(c) An interlock is provided to turn off all sources of fuel and electrical power to the cooktop or range when the suppressionsystem is activated.

(7)

(8)

(9) Portable fire extinguishers in accordance with NFPA 96 are located in all kitchen areas.

(10)

(11) Procedures for the use, inspection, testing, and maintenance of the cooking equipment are in accordance with Chapter 11 ofNFPA 96 and the manufacturer’s instructions are followed.

(12)

(13) The smoke alarms required by 26.3.3.8.3(12) are permitted to be located outside the kitchen area where such placement isnecessary for compliance with the 20 ft (6.1 m) minimum distance criterion.

(14) A single system smoke detector is permitted to be installed in lieu of the smoke alarms required in 26.3.3.8.3(12) provided thefollowing criteria are met:

(a) The detector is located not closer than 20 ft (6.1 m) and not further farther than 25 ft (7.6 m) from the cooktop or range.

(b) The detector is permitted to initiate a local audible alarm signal only.

(c) The detector is not required to initiate a buildingwide occupant notification signal.

(d) The detector is not required to notify emergency forces.

(e) The local audible signal initiated by the detector is permitted to be silenced and reset by a button on the detector or by aswitch installed within 10 ft (3.0 m) of the system smoke detector.

(f) System smoke detectors that are required to be installed in corridors or spaces open to the corridor by other sections of thischapter are not used to meet the requirements of 26.3.3.8.3(12) and are located not closer than 25 ft (7.6 m) to the cooktopor range.




Street Address:

City:

* The hood systems have a minimum airflow of 500 cfm (14,000 L/min).

* The use of solid fuel for cooking is prohibited.

* Deep-fat frying is prohibited.

* A switch meeting all of the following is provided:

(a) A locked switch, or a switch located in a restricted location, is provided within the cooking facility that deactivates thecooktop or range.

(b) The switch is used to deactivate the cooktop or range whenever the kitchen is not under staff supervision.

(c) The switch is on a timer, not exceeding a 120-minute capacity, that automatically deactivates the cooktop or range,independent of staff action.

* Not less than two AC-powered photoelectric smoke alarms, interconnected in accordance with 55.2.2.10.7, equipped with asilence feature are located not closer than 20 ft (6.1 m) and not farther than 25 ft (7.6 m) from the cooktop or range.


234 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Correlation with NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


22 Eligible Voters

3 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Allen, Scott D.

Jones, Adam C.

Mills, David E.

Affirmative All

Asp, Roland A.

Beebe, Chad E.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bradley, Harry L.

Day, Richard L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Jose, Philip R.

Kowalenko, Henry

Larrimer, Peter A.

McDermott, Randy S.


Rickard, John A.

Rierson, Carter J.

Rosenbaum, Eric R.

Schultz, Terry

Talley, Joshua

Taluba, Jon


Worley, Fred


235 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


27.2.1.6 Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.

27.2.1.6.1

Where bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, or showers are present, grab bars shall be provided in accordance with theprovisions of 11.1.6.5 .

27.2.1.6.2

The provisions of 27.2.1.6.1 shall not apply to display bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, or showers.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Aug 01 14:28:09 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The provisions of 11.1.6.5 provides necessary safety for showers and bathtubs. The provisions of 27.2.1.5.2 exempt displayshowers and bathtubs from the provisions of 27.2.1.5 so as to not over-apply the provisions. It is not intended that theprovisions of 11.1.6.5 apply to all merchandise and fixture displays found in some mercantile occupancies. Revision isconsistent with changes proposed for NFPA 101.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Dodge, David A.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.



236 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Smith, James B.

Even though I understand the safety which is gained by the installation of these types of grab bars, I do not feel the provisions are bestlocated in the mercantile egress section. I feel they would be better located within the General Requirements or Special Provisions section.


Bush, Kenneth E.

Although the presence of grab bars at showers and tubs may be a reasonable requirement for overall occupant safety, and while it isunderstood that the Scope of this Code has been expanded to address additional occupant safety measures, these requirements should notbe a part of this document. It is beyond the scope of the responsibility of fire officials to inspect and approve the installation of this type ofprotection. In addition, the consideration of these spaces as part of the required means of egress introduces a number of issues; to includeadequacy of headroom, the levelness and slip resistance of walking surfaces, the operation of tub and shower opening protectives to includeswinging and sliding doors and curtains, latches and locking devices installed for security measures, and levels of illumination, that are notregulated by current Code provisions. These issues are of particular importance where curbs or sides are installed to control the spread ofwater during normal operations, and where the installation of grab bars or poles could be considered as an obstruction to egress travel orreduction to required egress capacity. The limited application to this occupancy precludes the introduction of these restrictions to the Code.

Derr, Kevin L.

The submitter has provided a substantial amount of information with regards to the accident rates of bathroom use. However, the installationof grab bars is not an issue that should be addressed in this chapter of NFPA 5000. Requirements for grab bars for bathrooms would moreappropriate be located in Chapter 12 of NFPA 5000 and the referenced ADAAG and ANSI A117.1.

Frable, David W.

While I acknowledge there may be a need for such protective devices, I am not convinced that these devices should be regulated by the firecode official who may be responsible for enforcing this Code. I am also concerned with the introduction of this material into the Chapterregarding Means of Egress and with associating these devices to a means of protection along the egress path since there are otherrequirements associated with this portion of the egress path, such as floor levels (including stepping over the edges of tubs and showercurbs), which is not addressed.

Freels, Douglas R.

The installation of grab bars for bath tubs and showers should not be a mandatory requirement of the LSC.


237 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


27.4.4.2.2* Mall Structure.

A single building structure enclosing a number of tenants and occupancies wherein two or more tenants or tenant buildings have amain entrance into one or more malls concourses . For the purpose of this chapter Code , anchor buildings shall not be consideredas a part of the mall structure. (See 3.3.68.12.)



A.27.4.4.2.2.docx add to existing annex text




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates annex language to better reflect the concept of open and enclosed mall concourses.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.


238 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


239 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.27.4.4.2.2 A mall structure can include either an enclosed mall concourse or an open mall concourse. A mall structure may be enclosed by construction which could range from total enclosure to construction which is open, either partially or totally, to the outer air. For structures without complete walls and/or roof, the termination of the mall exit discharge would determine the extent of the structure.

of 391


27.4.4.2.5 Mall Concourse.

A roofed or covered common pedestrian area within a mall structure that serves as access for two or more tenants and does notexceed three levels that are open to each other. (See 3.3.384.)

27.4.4.2.5.1* Open Mall Concourse.

A mall concourse that either (1) has 50 percent or more of the total area of the solid mall concourse perimeter walls and solid roofarea open to the atmosphere with openings distributed uniformly over the length of the mall concourse, or (2) has an approvedopen mall concourse engineering analysis.

27.4.4.2.5.2 Enclosed Mall Concourse.

A mall concourse that does not meet the definition of open mall concourse.



A.27.4.4.2.5_a_.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

he proposed changes are the result of task group work that was initiated at the completion of the 2015 revision cycle. The focusof the task group was to update terminology related to shopping malls to better describe the applicability and intent of the Codesections as well as develop language to address both enclosed and open mall concourses. The changes proposed here as publiccomments represent a continuation of the work proposed during the First Draft stage. The focus of these changes is to clarify theproposed definitions of open and enclosed mall concourses and to address the impact of these new definitions on the currentmall provisions. Open mall concourses are becoming a very common design of mall type structures where as much of thepedestrian area is open to the outside. The provisions developed here recognize this now popular design approach and alsorecognize that the hazards with open mall concourses are different than enclosed mall concourses. Much thought and discussionwas contributed by the full committee during the Second Draft meeting. Annex language was carefully developed to assist usersin understanding and applying the new open mall concourse concept. The changes proposed in the multiple Second Revisionsthroughout Section 27.4.4 incorporate the concept of open mall concourse as set forth in the definitions shown in this revision.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott


240 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Bush, Kenneth E.

Further explanation may be necessary to clarify the intent that the measurement of solid wall areas defining mall concourse perimeters couldalso include storefront openings to tenant spaces within the mall that are defined by gates or other devices that are not of solid construction.


241 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.27.4.4.2.5(a) An open mall concourse is permitted to serve as the public way provided that the open mall concourse meets the definition of public way in accordance with this Code.

It is intended that the open mall concourse be designed, constructed, and arranged to permit the natural venting of smoke and other products of combustion to the outside air through openings in the walls, roof, or combination thereof of the mall concourse. The solid area of the mall concourse walls and horizontal projection of the solid area of any roof structures, including shade structures, awnings, and canopies, that cover the mall concourse is to be summed to determine the aggregate area of solid construction associated with the mall concourse. A mall concourse can be considered an open mall concourse where at least fifty percent (50%) of the aggregate area of solid construction is open to the atmosphere. Open areas can include entrances to the mall concourse (e.g. such as barred gates which allow air to pass through versus an entrance storefront), clearstory spaces between the mall building (structure which houses tenants) and the roof above, and openings in the roof assembly. In order for the openings to be effective they must also be distributed uniformly over the length of the mall concourse. Caution must be exercised in the design and construction so as to not create areas of possible congestion for smoke and hot gasses to accumulate, such as a pitched (steep slope) roof assembly within the mall concourse.

Roof assemblies are permitted to have holes or open areas which represent openings to the outside. The roof assembly is also permitted to consist of a structure or assembly which allows the venting of the mall concourse. Examples of these vented roof structures include a roof trellis or an exposed roof structural frame only with no roofing materials. These types of structures that would permit the omission of automatic sprinkler protection, in accordance with NFPA 13, could be included to serve as open space for the purposes of the calculation of areas open to the outside air. Caution should be taken not to allow vegetation to grow into and around these structures which could reduce or impede the venting capabilities.

of 391


27.4.4.5 General.

27.4.4.5.1 Single Building.

The mall structure shall be treated as a single building for the purpose of calculation of means of egress and shall be subject to therequirements for appropriate occupancies, except as modified by the provisions of 27.4.4 ; and the mall concourse shall be of aclear width not less than that needed to accommodate egress requirements as set forth in other sections of this Code .

27.4.4.5.2* Open Mall Concourse Engineering Analysis.

A mall concourse shall be permitted to be classified as an open mall concourse where an approved engineering analysisdemonstrates that the mall concourse is designed to keep the smoke layer interface at 6 ft (1830 mm) above the highest walkinglevel surface open to the mall concourse, for a period equal to 1.5 times the calculated egress time or 20 minutes, whichever isgreater.



A.27.4.4.5.2.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

27.4.4.5.1: Added for correlation with NFPA 101. Provision sets fundmental design concept for mall structure egresssystems.

27.4.4.5.2: New section sets performance criteria which can be used to define an open mall concourse in order to apply thenew provisions for open mall concourses, as newly defined, throughout 27.4.4. The performance criteria is based on otherengineering analyses in the code such as atria.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All


242 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


243 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.27.4.4.5.2 Multiple fire scenarios may need to be considered to evaluate overall tenability of the mall concourse space. See Section 5.5.

of 391


27.4.4.6.2* Travel Distance.

The travel distance within a tenant space to an exit or to the mall concourse shall not exceed the maximum travel distance permittedby the occupancy chapter.The mall concourse shall be permitted to be considered a pedestrian way, provided that the criteria of27.4.4.6.2.1 through 27.4.4.6.2.2 are met.

27.4.4.6.2.1

The travel distance within a tenant space to an exit or to the mall concourse shall not exceed the maximum travel distance permittedby the occupancy chapter.

27.4.4.6.2.2

An additional 200 ft (61 m) shall be permitted for travel through the enclosed mall concourse space or 300 ft (91 m) for travelthrough the open mall concourse , provided that all of the following requirements are met:

(1)

(2) On each side of the mall concourse floor area, the mall concourse shall be provided with an unobstructed exit access of not lessthan 10 ft (3050 mm) in clear width parallel to, and adjacent to, the mall concourse tenant front.

(3)

(4) The mall concourse, and all buildings connected thereto, except open parking structures, shall be protected throughout by anapproved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 55.3.1.1(1)55.3.1.1(1)55.3.1.1 .

(5) The sprinkler system specified in 27.4.4.6.2.1(4)27.4.4.6.2.1(4)27.4.4.6.2.2 shall be installed in such a manner that any portionof the system serving tenant spaces can be taken out of service without affecting the operation of the portion of the systemserving the mall concourse.

(6)

(7)



A.27.4.4.5.2.2_1_.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The concept of pedestrian way was used in the code to prevent the mall concourse from being enforced as a corridor. The termpedestrian way is not defined in the Code and is not used in any other provisions in Section 27.4.4. Section 27.4.4.4 includesprovisions for travel distance within the tenant space and the mall concourse area so the change in title reflects therequirements. The change more clearly coordinates with title and application of new terminology in this chapter and those usedby current industry standards.

27.4.4.5.2.2: The code has other scenarios where additional travel is permitted in exterior environments, or scenarios whereextra protection features offer additional safety to occupants. The travel distance extension here represents a similar principlewith comparable hazards and conditions (example: where special provisions have been made for the control and removal ofsmoke and products of combustion such as smoke protected assembly seating, outdoor stadia, facilities with exterior exitaccess and egress components which are open to the outside air). The new definition of open mall concourse provides supportfor increase in travel distance.

* The mall concourse shall be of a clear width not less than that needed to accommodate egress requirements as set forth inother sections of this chapter, but shall be not less than 20 ft (6100 mm) wide in its narrowest dimension.

* The exit access from a mall concourse, as specified in 27.4.4.6.2.1(2), shall lead to an exit having a width of not less than 66in. (1675 mm).

* Walls dividing tenant spaces from each other shall have a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour, and all of the followingalso shall apply:

(a) The partition shall extend to the underside of the ceiling or to the roof or floor or roof deck above.

(b) No separation shall be required between a tenant space and the mall concourse.

* Malls with a floor opening connecting more than two levels shall be provided with a smoke control system.


244 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.27.4.4.5.2.2(1): New annex reference sends users to a section in the general mercantile on wheeled carts or kiosksobstructing a means of

egress to assist in enforcing the clear width.

27.4.4.5.2.2(6): Consistent terminology from Chapter 8 and definition. Without ‘deck’ the demarcation is left up to the AHJ.Clarifies the

termination point of the partition. Has to extend to the finished deck of the roof or floor.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


245 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.27.4.4.5.2.2(1) See Section 27.2.5.7

of 391


27.4.4.6.3

Dead ends not exceeding a length equal to twice the width of the mall concourse for enclosed mall concourses or two and a halftimes the width of the mall concourse for open mall concourses , measured at the narrowest location within the dead-end portion ofthe mall concourse, shall be permitted.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The increase in dead end travel compares to other occupancies that allow from 20 to 50 ft. Many occupancies allow a 20 ftdead end in nonsprinklered buildings and an increase to 50 ft where the building is protected throughout by an automaticsprinkler system. This proposed increase in dead end travel for open mall concourses represents the specific hazardsassociated with open mall concourses based upon the new definition proposed for open mall concourses. The changecoordinates with other occupancies where special arrangements have been provided to prevent for the accumulation of smokein the means of egress.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.


246 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


247 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


27.4.4.8.1 Automatic Extinguishing Systems.

27.4.4.8.1.1

The mall structure and all anchor buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system inaccordance with NFPA 13, 55.3.2, and 27.4.4.8.1.

27.4.4.8.1.2

The system shall be installed in such a manner that any portion of the system serving tenant spaces can be taken out of servicewithout affecting the operation of the portion of the system serving the mall concourse.

27.4.4.8.1.3*

Any shade structures, canopies, awnings, or similar structures in the open mall concourse shall be protected by an approved,supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7.

27.4.4.8.1.4*

Kiosks shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised, automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 55.3 .



A.27.4.4.7.1.3.docx

A.27.4.4.7.1.4.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

27.4.4.7.1.3 and Annex: Many open mall concourses contain shade structures and other features that may necessitate theneed for automatic sprinkler protection. The proposed languages points user to the applicable section of Chapter 9 and thento NFPA 13 for the necessary guidance on how to protect these features.

27.4.4.7.1.4 and Annex: This text was formerly located in the section specifically for kiosks and is being relocated here tokeep requirements for extinguishment in one section; makes the section more user friendly.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott


248 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Smith, James B.

Although I am agreeing with the pointers to Section 9.7, I feel there will be less confusion if the provision said ". . . where required by Section9.7" instead of ". . . in accordance with Section 9.7".


249 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.27.4.4.7.1.3 Examples of these roof type structures include but are not limited to shade structures, canopies, awnings or other similar structures located above the open mall concourse which serve as a screen or shelter from the sun, rain, or other atmospheric and climatological effects. However, these structures are designed to only partially enclose the area above a mall concourse, allow the mall concourse to be open to the atmosphere, and not serve as roof that is designed to separate the conditioned space of the mall concourse from the exterior atmosphere. These structures are permitted to be supported by the mall building, mall concourse walls, or can be self-supporting. It is intended that these structures be protected by a supervised automatic sprinkler system where required by NFPA 13 unless allowed to be omitted with approval of the AHJ.

of 391

A. 27.4.4.7.1.4 Sprinklers may be omitted in kiosks located in portions of open mall concourses where no roof exists. Where sprinklers are provided at the mall concourse ceiling, the obstruction provisions of NFPA 13 also apply.

of 391


27.4.4.9* Smoke Control.

A smoke control system in accordance with Section 55.7 and complying with 8.12.3(5)8.12.3(5)8.12.3 shall be provided in a anenclosed mall concourse with floor openings connecting more than two levels stories .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This proposed change to mandate smoke control only for enclosed mall concourses connecting more than two levelsrepresents the specific hazards associated with open versus enclosed mall concourses based upon the new definitionproposed for open mall concourses. The change coordinates with other occupancies and other changes within the mall sectionwhere special arrangements have been provided to prevent for the accumulation of smoke in the means of egress.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.



250 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Gauvin, Daniel J.

Compliance with 8.12.3(6) should also be required.


251 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 6517-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 27.4.4.10 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Emergency lighting shall be provided in accordance with 27.2.9.



A.27.4.4.5.10.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

A pointer back to the core chapter section on emergency lighting reminds users about the application of emergency lighting.The means of egress including exit access and exit discharge will need to be defined based on whether the structure is beingenforced as an open mall concourse or an enclosed mall concourse.

Note: This section was located in the section for fire alarm requirements. It is being moved to the egress section forconsistency with provisions and organization in NFPA 101.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.


252 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


253 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.27.4.4.5.10 For the purposes of emergency lighting the open mall concourse should be considered a component of the means of egress. See Section 11.9.1.2.

of 391

Second Revision No. 6506-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 27.4.4.10.3.4 ]

27.4.4.11.4 Risk Analysis for Mass Notification.

Mall structures shall conduct a risk analysis to determine the need for a mass notification system in accordance with Section55.13 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

After the First Draft meeting a task group was established to develop text for if and when the new provisions of Section 55.13should apply to mercantile and business occupancies. After multiple meetings of the task group as well as input from the fullcommittee the proposed text identifies mall structures as appropriate mercantile occupancies for requiring a risk analysis todetermine if a mass notification system is required. Mall structures are large structures that incorporate a number of differenttenant uses and tend to have a higher occupant load. There have been multiple recent events in mall structures that wouldsupport the requirement for a risk analysis for mass notification systems. These systems can provide real time communicationand response to the occupants.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Dodge, David A.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


254 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Derr, Kevin L.


Frable, David W.

I agree with negative comments submitted by Mr. Derr and Ms. Rice.

Rice, Sarah A.

There should be a threshold for mall structures before a risk analysis is required. As there is no minimum size for a small mall structure, torequire ALL mall structures to have a risk analysis is unreasonable.


255 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


27.4.4.13.2

Kiosks or similar structures located within the mall concourse shall be protected with approved fire suppression and detectiondevices.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Provisions for the protection of kiosks have been moved to Section 27.4.4.7.1 for extinguishing systems which retains theextinguishment provisions in same section.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.



256 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Rice, Sarah A.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


257 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


28.2.1.5 Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.

28.2.1.5.1

Where bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, or showers are present, grab bars shall be provided in accordance with theprovisions of 11.1.6.5 .

28.2.1.5.2

The provisions of 28.2.1.5.1 shall not apply to display bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, or showers.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The provisions of 11.1.6.5 provides necessary safety for showers and bathtubs in business occupancies. The provisions of28.2.1.5.2 exempt display showers and bathtubs from the provisions of 28.2.1.5 so as to not over-apply the provisions. It is notintended that the provisions of 11.1.6.5 apply to all merchandise and fixture displays found in some business occupancieswhere merchandise is on display but where no sales are occurring. Provisions are consistent with changes proposed for NFPA101.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Dodge, David A.

Freels, Douglas R.


258 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Smith, James B.

Even though I understand the safety which is gained by the installation of these types of grab bars, I do not feel the provisions are bestlocated in the business egress section. I feel this provision would be better located in the General Requirements or Special Provisions sectionof the code.


Bush, Kenneth E.

Although the presence of grab bars at showers and tubs may be a reasonable requirement for overall occupant safety, and while it isunderstood that the Scope of this Code has been expanded to address additional occupant safety measures, these requirements should notbe a part of this document. It is beyond the scope of the responsibility of fire officials to inspect and approve the installation of this type ofprotection. In addition, the consideration of these spaces as part of the required means of egress introduces a number of issues; to includeadequacy of headroom, the levelness and slip resistance of walking surfaces, the operation of tub and shower opening protectives to includeswinging and sliding doors and curtains, latches and locking devices installed for security measures, and levels of illumination, that are notregulated by current Code provisions. These issues are of particular importance where curbs or sides are installed to control the spread ofwater during normal operations, and where the installation of grab bars or poles could be considered as an obstruction to egress travel orreduction to required egress capacity. The limited application to this occupancy precludes the introduction of these restrictions to the Code.

Derr, Kevin L.

The submitter has provided a substantial amount of information with regards to the accident rates of bathroom use. However, the installationof grab bars is not an issue that should be addressed in this chapter of NFPA 5000. Requirements for grab bars for bathrooms would moreappropriate be located in Chapter 12 of NFPA 5000 and the referenced ADAAG and ANSI A117.1.

Frable, David W.

While I acknowledge there may be a need for such protective devices, I am not convinced that these devices should be regulated by the firecode official who may be responsible for enforcing this Code. I am also concerned with the introduction of this material into the Chapterregarding Means of Egress and with associating these devices to a means of protection along the egress path since there are otherrequirements associated with this portion of the egress path, such as floor levels (including stepping over the edges of tubs and showercurbs), which is not addressed.

Rice, Sarah A.

I agree with the comments made. A requirement for a grab bar in a shower belongs in a plumbing code


259 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


28.2.2.2.2* Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry.

Where approved, doors, other than those complying with 28.2.11.2 , shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entryprovided that all the following conditions are met:


(2) The unlocking and unlatching operation from the egress side of the door shall be accomplished without the use of a key, atool, or special knowledge or effort.



(5) Locks, if remotely engaged, shall be unlockable from the egress side of the door without the use of a key, a tool, or specialknowledge or effort.



(8) Modifications to required fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80 .



A.28.2.2.2.2.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security – Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors againstunwanted entry. The multiple provisions proposed as part of 28.2.2.2.2 cover the concerns for accomplishing door locking inbusiness occupancies, such as those buildings on college and university campuses, in a safe manner. The detailed criteria willweed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar with traditionalegress needs. While the provisions are written to apply to doors in business occupancies, the annex text clarifies the intent of thissection is to apply only to doors where specialized security measures are needed to prevent unwanted entry. Examples of doorsthat may use these provisions include college and university classroom doors, areas of office spaces open to the public,laboratories, instructional rooms or spaces. There have been recent events where security has been an issue in both officebuildings and well as educational settings where both uses could benefit from the security offered from this proposed text.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


260 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Dodge, David A.

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Bellamy, Tracey D.

While I agree with the concept of allowing for use of a locking mechanism for protection of building occupants against an unwanted intruder, Isee the provisions of the proposed section as possibly being misapplied to require that all doors be provided with a external key or othermeans to release the door. Many exterior doors on buildings are intentionally designed to have no external key to enhance the intrusionsecurity of the building. Additionally internal doors are sometimes installed in the same manner to provide the occupant with a level ofassurance that the space they are occupying is secure against unwanted entry by other who have a key. Such spaces might include a privaterestroom or other space where the occupant desires the additional level of security during use. I believe there is a benefit to allowingoccupants to enhance their protection during situations that involve imminent danger but have concerns that this section will be misapplied torequire entry provisions to all doors.


Bush, Kenneth E.

This provision seems to be unnecessary for new construction. Adequate locking means are available and have been demonstrated to becapable of providing adequate security measures for new installations. The installation of additional locking hardware introduces an additionallevel of hazard to the use of required means of egress.

Derr, Kevin L.

These requirements are redundant to other egress door requirements.

Frable, David W.

I agree with negative comments submitted by Messrs. Bush and Derr.

Rice, Sarah A.

I agree with the comments made. A requirement for a grab bar in a shower belongs in a plumbing code


261 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

A.28.2.2.2.2 The intent of this section is to apply only where specialized security measures are needed to prevent unwanted entry. Examples of doors that may use these provisions include college and university classroom doors, areas of office spaces open to the public, laboratories, instructional rooms or spaces.

of 391


29.2.1.3

Bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and nonemergency showers shall be provided with grab bars in accordance with theprovisions of 11.1.6.5 .


Submitter Full Name: BLD-IND


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Emergency showers are often found in industrial occupancies where the presence of hazardous materials or processes occurand standards already exist that address the construction and features required for emergency showers. The text supports thenew provisions of Section 11.1.6.5 and is consistent with changes made to NFPA 101.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Birchler, Donald C.

Desrosier, John

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Jones, Adam C.

Krantz, Sr., Neal W.

Kraus, Richard S.

Affirmative All

Altoe, Franco Dino

Arntson, Raymond E.

Cummings, Ryan

Cusimano, Alberto

Dale, Stephen E.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Hanson, Robert E.

Humble, Jonathan

Johnson, Aaron


262 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Klein, Marshall A.

Klinkhardt, Jeffrey

Laberge, Todd

Lecair, Bruce

Lozano-Rosales, Roberto

McLaughlin, Patrick A.

Pierrottie, Jerald

Pruett, Scot

Sheldon, Steven A.

Skinker, Cleveland B.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Vosicky, John

White, Michael S.

Wren, Carl D.

Abstention

Sameth, Jerrold

CGA did not develop a consensus position.


263 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


30.2.1.3

Bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and nonemergency showers shall be provided with grab bars in accordance with theprovisions of 11.1.6.5 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Emergency showers are often found in industrial occupancies where the presence of hazardous materials or processes occurand standards already exist that address the construction and features required for emergency showers. The text supports thenew provisions of Section 11.1.6.5 and is consistent with changes made to NFPA 101.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Birchler, Donald C.

Desrosier, John

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Jones, Adam C.


Kraus, Richard S.

Affirmative All

Altoe, Franco Dino

Arntson, Raymond E.

Cummings, Ryan

Cusimano, Alberto

Dale, Stephen E.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Hanson, Robert E.

Humble, Jonathan

Johnson, Aaron


264 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Klein, Marshall A.

Klinkhardt, Jeffrey

Laberge, Todd

Lecair, Bruce



Pierrottie, Jerald

Pruett, Scot

Sheldon, Steven A.


Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Vosicky, John

White, Michael S.

Wren, Carl D.

Abstention

Sameth, Jerrold



265 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


31.6.13.3.2 Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials (SFRM).

In airport traffic control towers with an occupiable story greater than 75 ft (23 m) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle

access, the bond strength of SFRM installed shall be 430 psf (20.6 kN/m 2 ).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The proposed changes are included as the recommendation of the Technical Committee on Industrial, Storage andMiscellaneous Occupancies. The details are proposed by the Airport Traffic Control Tower Fire Life Safety Task Group, andreflect the current approach to fire protection and life safety in high rise buildings in general, but are applied to airport trafficcontrol towers (ATCT). The proposed changes relate to providing extra protection for the controllers and fire service andproviding consistency with other building codes and standards.

ATCTs create a unique hazard. ATCTs typically have a limited number of occupants. In addition, occupants must be awake andalert. The hazard associated with ATCTs is affected by the occupied levels being typically located at the top of the structure andthe potential delay in evacuation because of the handoff of flights.

Section 31.6.13.3.2 is proposed to provide additional structural protection by increasing the minimum bond strengths for sprayedfire-resistant materials as recommended by NIST based on the WTC research performed (see recommendation 6 from the WTCDisaster Study Recommendations). This raises the minimum bond strength to 430 psf for all ATCTs with an occupiable storymore than 75 ft above the lowest level of fire department access and puts the requirement in line with the IBC. The proposedrequirement provides additional protection of the structural frame where delayed evacuations may be required. Theserequirements are common to high-rise buildings in jurisdictions adopting the International Building Code.

("air traffic control tower" will be updated to "airport traffic control tower" through the Correlating Committee)

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Birchler, Donald C.

Desrosier, John

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Jones, Adam C.


Kraus, Richard S.


266 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Affirmative All

Altoe, Franco Dino

Arntson, Raymond E.

Cummings, Ryan

Cusimano, Alberto

Dale, Stephen E.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Hanson, Robert E.

Humble, Jonathan

Johnson, Aaron

Klein, Marshall A.

Klinkhardt, Jeffrey

Laberge, Todd

Lecair, Bruce



Pierrottie, Jerald

Pruett, Scot

Sheldon, Steven A.


Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Vosicky, John

White, Michael S.

Wren, Carl D.

Abstention

Sameth, Jerrold



267 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


31.6.13.3.1 Construction of Inside Exit Stairs and Elevator Hoistway Enclosures.

Enclosures for inside exit stairs and elevator hoistways in airport traffic control towers with an occupiable story greater than 75 ft(23 m) above the lowest level of fire department access shall comply with the following:

(1) Soft Body Impact Classification Level 2 in accordance with ASTM C1629/C1629N, Standard Classification for Abuse-Resistant Nondecorated Interior Gypsum Panel Products and Fiber-Reinforced Cement Panels , shall be met or exceededfor wall assemblies constructed for inside exit stairs and elevator hoistways.

(2) Wall assembly materials forming the exterior of the enclosure shall be in accordance with one of the following:

(a) Hard Body Impact Classification Level 2 in accordance with ASTM C1629/C1629M shall be met or exceeded where awall assembly includes at least two layers of impact-resistant construction board.

(b) Hard Body Impact Classification Level 3 in accordance with ASTM C1629/C1629M shall be met or exceeded where awall assembly includes at least one layer of impact-resistant construction material.

(c) Hard Body Impact Classification Level 3 in accordance with ASTM C1629/C1629M shall be met or exceeded where awall assembly is composed of multiple layers tested in tandem of any material.

(3) The requirements of 31.6.13.3.1(1) and 31.6.13.3.1(2) shall not apply to concrete and masonry walls.

(4) Where the impact resistance for Hard Body Impact Classification Level 3 in accordance with ASTM C1629/C1629M is met orexceeded, the wall assembly shall be permitted.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The proposed changes are included as the recommendation of the Technical Committee on Industrial, Storage andMiscellaneous Occupancies. The details are proposed by the Airport Traffic Control Tower Fire Life Safety Task Group, andreflect the current approach to fire protection and life safety in high rise buildings in general, but are applied to airport trafficcontrol towers (ATCT). The proposed changes relate to providing extra protection for the controllers and fire service andproviding consistency with other building codes and standards.

ATCTs create a unique hazard. ATCTs typically have a limited number of occupants. In addition, occupants must be awake andalert. The hazard associated with ATCTs is affected by the occupied levels being typically located at the top of the structure andthe potential delay in evacuation because of the handoff of flights.

Section 31.6.13.3.1 is proposed to provide additional protection of vertical shafts used for travel of occupants and isrecommended by NIST based on the WTC research performed (see recommendation 18 from the WTC Disaster StudyRecommendations). Adding structural integrity criteria to these vertical shafts provides additional protection in an occupancywhere delayed evacuations may be required. These requirements are common to high-rise buildings in New York City andjurisdictions adopting the International Building Code.

("air traffic control tower" will be updated to "airport traffic control tower" through the Correlating Committee)

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned


268 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

23 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Birchler, Donald C.

Desrosier, John

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Jones, Adam C.


Kraus, Richard S.

Affirmative All

Altoe, Franco Dino

Arntson, Raymond E.

Cummings, Ryan

Cusimano, Alberto

Dale, Stephen E.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Hanson, Robert E.

Humble, Jonathan

Johnson, Aaron

Klein, Marshall A.

Klinkhardt, Jeffrey

Laberge, Todd

Lecair, Bruce



Pierrottie, Jerald

Pruett, Scot

Sheldon, Steven A.


Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Vosicky, John

White, Michael S.

Wren, Carl D.

Abstention

Sameth, Jerrold



269 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 5504-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Sections 31.6.13.4, 31.6.13.5, 31.6.13.6, 31.6.13.7 ]

31.6.13.4 Means of Egress.

Global SR-4004

31.6.13.4.1* Number of Means of Egress.

Air traffic control towersAirport traffic control towers shall be permitted to have a single exit, provided that all the followingconditions are met in addition to the requirements of 31.6.5 :

(1) Each level of air traffic control towersairport traffic control towers, served by a single exit, shall be subject to a calculatedoccupant load of 15 or fewer persons.

(2) A fire alarm system shall be provided in accordance with Section 55.2 . Smoke detection shall be provided throughout airtraffic control towersairport traffic control towers to meet the requirements of partial coverage, as defined in 5.5.2.2 of NFPA72 , and shall include coverage of all of the following:

(a) Observation level

(b) Means of egress

(c) All equipment rooms

(d) Incidental accessory uses

(e) Accessible utility shafts

(3) The requirements of 31.6.5.1(5)31.6.5.1(5)31.6.5.1 shall not apply.

(4) Rooms or spaces used for the storage, processing, or use of combustible supplies shall be permitted in quantities deemedacceptable by the authority having jurisdiction.

(5) Smokeproof exit enclosures shall be provided in accordance with 11.2.3 .

31.6.13.4.2 Remoteness.

Where an air traffic control tower airport traffic control tower is equipped throughout with an approved, supervised automaticsprinkler system in accordance with Section 55.3 , the minimum separation distance between two exits, or exit accesses, measuredin accordance with 11.5.1.4.2 shall be not less than one-fourth of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of thebuilding or area to be served.

31.6.13.4.3 Accessible Means of Egress.

Accessible means of egress shall not be required to serve the observation level and the floor immediately below the observationlevel in air traffic control towers airport traffic control towers .

31.6.13.4.4 Egress for Occupant Load.

Means of egress for air traffic control towers airport traffic control towers shall be provided for the occupant load, as determined inaccordance with 11.3.1.

31.6.13.4.5 Areas Excluded from Occupant Load.

Shafts, stairs, and spaces and floors not subject to human occupancy shall be excluded from consideration in determining the totalcalculated occupant load of the tower, as required by 31.6.5.1(1)31.6.5.1 and 31.6.13.4.1(1)31.6.13.4.1 .

Global SR-4004

31.6.13.4.6 Single Means of Egress.

A single means of egress shall be permitted from the observation level of an air traffic control towerairport traffic control tower to anexit, as permitted by 31.6.5.2 .

31.6.13.4.7 Smokeproof Enclosures.

Smokeproof exit enclosures complying with 11.2.3 shall be provided for all air traffic control tower airport traffic control tower exitenclosures.

31.6.13.4.8 Discharge from Exits.

31.6.13.4.8.1

Air traffic control towers Airport traffic control towers shall comply with the requirements of 11.7.2, except as permitted by31.6.13.4.6.2 .

31.6.13.5 Protection.

Global SR-4004


270 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

31.6.13.5.1 Detection, Alarm, and Communications Systems.

Air traffic control towersAirport traffic control towers shall be provided with a fire alarm system in accordance with Section 55.2.Smoke detection shall be provided throughout the air traffic control towerairport traffic control tower to meet the requirements forpartial coverage, as defined in 5.5.2.2 of NFPA 72 , and shall include coverage of all of the following:

(1) All equipment rooms

(2) Observation level

(3) Outside each opening into exit enclosures

(4) Along the single means of egress permitted from observation levels in 31.6.5.2

(5) Outside each opening into the single means of egress permitted from observation levels in 31.6.5.2

31.6.13.5.2 Extinguishing Requirements.

Air traffic control towers Airport traffic control towers shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinklersystem in accordance with Section 55.3.

31.6.13.5.3 Standpipe Requirements.

New air traffic control towers airport traffic control towers where the floor of the observation level is greater than 30 ft (9.1 m) abovethe lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be protected throughout with a Class I standpipe system in accordance withSection 55.4. Class I standpipes shall be permitted to be manual standpipes, as defined in NFPA 14, where the authority havingjurisdiction has been determined to have sufficient capabilities to supply the system.

Global SR-4004

31.6.13.6 Prohibited Uses.

Sleeping areas shall be prohibited in air traffic control towersairport traffic control towers.

31.6.13.7 Emergency Command Center.

31.6.13.7.1

An emergency command center shall be provided in a location approved by the fire department where the floor of an occupiablestory is greater than 75 ft (23 m) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. Emergency command center is shall bepermitted to be located in the air traffic control tower airport traffic control tower or an adjacent contiguous building where buildingfunctions are interdependent.


271 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

31.6.13.7.2

The emergency command center shall contain the following:

(1) Fire department two-way telephone communication service panels and controls

(2) Fire detection and fire alarm system control unit and annunciator

(3) Elevator floor location and operation annunciators

(4) Elevator fire recall switch in accordance with ASME A17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators

(5) Controls and annunciators for systems supporting smokeproof enclosures

(6) Sprinkler valve and waterflow annunciators

(7) Emergency generator status indicators

(8) Schematic building plans indicating typical floor plan and detailing the building core, means of egress, fire protection systems,fire-fighting equipment and fire department access as well as the location of fire walls, fire barriers, fire partitions, smokebarriers, and smoke partitions

(9) Fire pump status indicators

(10) Telephone for fire department use with controlled access to the public telephone system

(11) An approved Building Information Card that contains, but is not limited to, the following information:

(a) General building information that includes: property name, address, the number of floors in the building (above and belowgrade), use and occupancy classification (for mixed uses, identify the different types of occupancies on each floor),estimated building population (i.e., day, night, weekend)

(b) Building emergency contact information that includes a list of the building's emergency contacts (e.g., building manager,building engineer) and their respective work phone numbers, cell phone numbers, email addresses

(c) Building construction information that includes the type of building construction (e.g., floors, walls, columns, and roofassembly)

(d) Exit stair information that includes: the number of exit stairs in the building, each exit stair designation and floors served,location where each exit stair discharges, exit stairs that are pressurized, exit stairs provided with emergency lighting, eachexit stair that allows re-entry, exit stairs providing roof access; elevator information that includes: the number of elevatorbanks, elevator bank designation, elevator car numbers and respective floors that they serve, location of elevator machinerooms, location of sky lobby, location of freight elevator banks

(e) Building services and system information that includes location of mechanical rooms, location of building managementsystem, location and capacity of all fuel oil tanks, location of emergency generator, location of natural gas service

(f) Fire protection system information that includes locations of standpipes, location of fire pump room, location of firedepartment connections, floors protected by automatic sprinklers, location of different types of sprinkler systems installed(e.g., dry, wet, preaction)

(g) Hazardous material information that includes location of hazardous material and quantity of hazardous material

(12) Worktable




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The changes shown in this revision are in response to the request of the Correlating Committee via Public Comment No. 32.The committee did not make the change as requested in item 1 and retains the phrase "means of egress." Using the phrase"means of egress" provides the necessary guidance to designers and reviews when evaluating the design of airport trafficcontrol towers. The requirement intended that detection be provided in all areas of means of egress to help ensure adequateprotection for these structures that often have only one way out. In addition, occupants of the ATCT may have their egressdelayed due to equipment shutdown and procedures and the detection provides the early response needed to account fordelayed response/egress.

A request will be brought forth to the NFPA 5000 Correlating Committee to update the term "air traffic control tower" to "airporttraffic control tower" throughout the document which correlates with changes made to NFPA 101 during the First Draft.

ResponseMessage:



272 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Birchler, Donald C.

Desrosier, John

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Jones, Adam C.


Kraus, Richard S.

Affirmative All

Altoe, Franco Dino

Arntson, Raymond E.

Cummings, Ryan

Cusimano, Alberto

Dale, Stephen E.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Hanson, Robert E.

Humble, Jonathan

Johnson, Aaron

Klein, Marshall A.

Klinkhardt, Jeffrey

Laberge, Todd

Lecair, Bruce



Pierrottie, Jerald

Pruett, Scot

Sheldon, Steven A.


Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Vosicky, John

White, Michael S.

Wren, Carl D.

Abstention

Sameth, Jerrold



273 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


31.6.13.8 Emergency Action Plans and Fire Drills.

31.6.13.8.1

All air traffic control towers shall have written copies of an emergency action plan as required by Section 4.8.

31.6.13.8.2

Fire drills shall be conducted such that all employees participate at least once annually in accordance with Section 4.7.

31.6.13.8.3

Employees of air traffic control towers shall be instructed at least annually in the emergency action plan.

31.6.13.8.4

The emergency action plan shall be updated at least annually.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Provisions for emergency plans and fire drills are outside the scope of NFPA 5000.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Birchler, Donald C.

Desrosier, John

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Jones, Adam C.


Kraus, Richard S.

Affirmative All

Altoe, Franco Dino

Arntson, Raymond E.

Cummings, Ryan

Cusimano, Alberto

Dale, Stephen E.


274 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Hanson, Robert E.

Humble, Jonathan

Johnson, Aaron

Klein, Marshall A.

Klinkhardt, Jeffrey

Laberge, Todd

Lecair, Bruce



Pierrottie, Jerald

Pruett, Scot

Sheldon, Steven A.


Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Vosicky, John

White, Michael S.

Wren, Carl D.

Abstention

Sameth, Jerrold



275 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


32.2.3.1 General.

In addition to the requirements of this Code, tension membrane structures shall be designed and operated in accordance withASCE/SEI 55, Tension Tensile Membrane Structures.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 08:53:03 PDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This comment simply corrects the title of ASCE 55.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott


276 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


277 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


32.2.4.1* General.

In addition to the requirements of this Code, air-supported structures shall be designed and operated in accordance with ASCE/SEI55, Tension Tensile Membrane Structures.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This comment simply corrects the title of ASCE 55.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott


278 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


279 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


33.3.1.3 Risk Analysis for Mass Notification Systems.

For high-rise buildings with a total occupant load of 5000 or more persons, or where the floor of an occupiable story is greater than420 ft (128 m) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access, a risk analysis for mass notification systems shall beprovided in accordance with Section 55.13 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The thresholds (5000 occupants and 420 ft building height) are intended to correlate with information from NFPA 5000,A.4.2.1. The building height measurement is consistent with the definition of 'high rise building'.

See the submitter's statement on PC No. 105.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.


280 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


281 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


33.3.4.1

Emergency lighting in accordance with Section 11.9 shall be provided.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Move text in 33.3.4.1 to a new 33.2.1, without revision. (33.2.1 is currently Reserved.)

SR is intended to correlate with NFPA 101.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.


282 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


283 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


33.3.7 Fire Service Access Elevator.

In buildings with an occupied floor over 120 ft (36.6 m) in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access, aminimum of two fire service access elevators, each having a minimum 3500 lb (1590 kg) capacity and serving every floor withinthe subject building, shall be provided to serve as fire service access elevators in accordance with Section 54.12 .

33.3.7.1

In buildings with an occupied floor over 120 ft (36.6 m) in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access, a minimumof two fire service access elevators, each having a minimum 3500 lb (1590 kg) capacity and serving every floor within the subjectbuilding the lowest level of fire department vehicle access and all floors above , shall be provided to serve as fire service accesselevators in accordance with Section 54.12.

33.3.7.2

Elevators that serve only an open or enclosed parking garage and the lobby of the building shall not be required to serve as fireservice access elevators in accordance with 33.3.7 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

There are two aspects this revision addresses.

The first is that it was not the intention that FSAEs be available in the levels of the building below the lowest level of firedepartment access. Typically the fire department is more concerned with traveling high in the building and does not require thatthe same facilities be provided in the lower levels of the building. Most fire departments will likely not take an elevator belowgrade to a fire when the stairs are manageable. This will likely only affect buildings on steep grades where the lowest level offire department access differs greatly from the main entrance.

The second aspect addresses the issue that FSAEs are not necessary in parking garages. As noted the fire department is morelikely to use FSAEs due to the height of the building. In addition, fire fighters typically are not willing to take an elevator past thefire floor. Instead in such cases they would prefer the use of the stairway.

See Committee Input No. 6112.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.


284 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


Frable, David W.

I was the proponent of the original code section and I am in agreement with this revision that it was not the intention that FSAEs be availablein the levels of the building below the lowest level of fire department access and that FSAEs are not necessary in parking garages.


285 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


34.3.2.4.6 Common Path of Travel.

34.3.2.4.6.1

For other than industrial and storage occupancies, the The common path of travel from areas required to comply with ProtectionLevel 1 through Protection Level 5 shall not exceed the distance given in Table 34.3.2.4.6.1 Table 34.3.2.4.6 .

Table 34.3.2.4.6.1 Common Path of Travel Distance Limits

Protection Level Distance

ft m

1 25 8

2 25 8

3 25 8

4 75 23

5 75 23

34.3.2.4.6.2

In industrial and storage occupancies, for other than rooms or spaces that do not exceed 200 ft 2 (18.6 m 2 ), have an occupantload not exceeding three persons, and have a travel distance to the room door not exceeding 25 ft (7.6 m), means of egress shallbe arranged so that there is no common path of travel.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revised text is in response to Correlating Committee request and noted ballot comment. The new language correlatesthe common path of travel requirements with those as prescribed in NFPA 101 for high hazard storage and industrialoccupancies.

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 33-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 34.3.2.4.6]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Birchler, Donald C.

Desrosier, John

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Jones, Adam C.


286 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Kraus, Richard S.

Affirmative All

Altoe, Franco Dino

Arntson, Raymond E.

Cummings, Ryan

Cusimano, Alberto

Dale, Stephen E.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Humble, Jonathan

Johnson, Aaron

Klinkhardt, Jeffrey

Laberge, Todd

Lecair, Bruce



Pierrottie, Jerald

Pruett, Scot

Sheldon, Steven A.


Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Vosicky, John

White, Michael S.

Wren, Carl D.


Hanson, Robert E.

Additional inconsistencies should be examined between NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 for high hazard occupancies. For example, Table34.3.2.3 in NFPA 5000 does not align with Table 6.1.14.4.1(a) for high hazard industrial and storage occupancies


Klein, Marshall A.

I see no justification for new Section 34.3.2.4.6.2 to prohibit any amount of common path of travel in high hazard industrial or storageoccupancies over 200 sq. ft. Even the IBC Table 1006.2.1 permits a common path of travel not to exceed 25 feet in sprinklered H-1, H-2 andH-3 occupancies. I see no reason the NFPA 5000 needs to be more stringent. This new section would not permit even a foot of two commonpath of travel when the areas is over 200 sq. ft.? This revisions should be rejected and worked on next code cycle.

Abstention

Sameth, Jerrold



287 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


35.1.2.8.3 Steel.

The deflection of steel structural members shall not exceed that permitted by the following, as applicable:

(1) AISC 360, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings

(2) AISI-S100, North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members

(3) ASCE/SEI 8, Standard Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Structural Members

(4) SJI CJ 200 , Standard Specifications for Composite Steel Joists, CJ-Series

(5) SJI-100, Standard Specification for K-Series, LH-Series, and DLH-Series Open Web Steel Joists and for Joist Girders




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This comment simply corrects the title of SJI-100 and modifies the short title of SJI-CJ to SJI-200.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)


288 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


289 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 7513-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 37.1 ]

37.1.5 Vertical and Lateral Flame Propagation on Exterior Nonbearing Walls.

37.1.5.1

Exterior nonbearing walls on buildings of Type I, II, III, or IV construction that are greater than 40 ft (12,192 mm) in height abovegrade plane shall be tested in accordance with, and meet the conditions of acceptance in, NFPA 285 unless otherwise permittedin 37.1.5.2 .

37.1.5.2

Where the water-resistive barrier is the only combustible component, exterior nonbearing walls shall not be required to be tested inaccordance with 37.1.5.2 if either of the following conditions apply:

(1) The exterior wall has a wall covering of masonry (including brick), concrete, stone, terra cotta, stucco, or corrosion-resistantsteel with minimum thicknesses in accordance with Table 37.1.5.2 .

(2) The water-resistive barrier complies with both of the following:

(a) The water-resistive barrier has a peak heat release rate of less than 13.2 (Btu/s)/ft 2 (150 kW/m 2 ), a total heat

release of less than 1761 Btu/ft 2 (20 MJ/m 2 ) , and an effective heat of combustion of less than 7738.6 Btu/lb (18MJ/kg) as determined in accordance with ASTM E1354, Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke ReleaseRates for Materials and Products Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter . The ASTM E1354 test shall beconducted on specimens at the thickness intended for use, in the horizontal orientation, and at an incident radiant heat

flux of 4.4 (Btu/s)/ft 2 (50 kW/m 2 ).

(b) The water-resistive barrier has a flame spread index of 25 or less and a smoke-developed index of 450 or less asdetermined in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of BuildingMaterials , or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials , with test specimenpreparation and mounting in accordance with ASTM E2404, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation andMounting of Textile, Paper or Polymeric (including Vinyl) Wall or Ceiling Coverings, and of Facings and Wood VeneersIntended to be Applied on Site Over a Wood Substrate to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics .

Table 37.1.5.2 Minimum Thicknesses for Exterior Wall Covering Materials

Covering Type Minimum Thickness (inches) Minimum Thickness (mm)

Masonry

Anchored (including brick) 2.0 50.8

Adhered 0.25 6.4

Steel (corrosion resistant) 0.0149 0.38

Stone

Cast artificial, anchored 1.5 38.1

Natural, adhered 2.0 50.8

Stucco or exterior cement plaster*

Three-coat work-over

Metal plaster base 0.875 22.2

Unit masonry 0.625 15.9

Cast-in-place or precast concrete 0.625 15.9

Two-coat work-over

Unit masonry 0.500 12.7

Cast-in-place or precast concrete 0.375 9.5

Terra cotta

Anchored 1.0 25.4

Adhered 0.25 6.4

*Exclusive of texture.

37.1.5.3

For the purposes of 37.1.5 , fenestration products and flashing of fenestration products shall not be considered part of the water-resistive barrier.



PC_1_Second_Revision_6.21.2016.docxThe Technical Committee wants to add the attached document as a new section after 37.1It was added as an attachment so that the table did not get altered.


290 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 22 15:17:19 PDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This Exterior Wall Task Group was charged with two tasks:

1. Review the June 2014 FPRF “Exterior Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components” report

2. Determine if changes are needed for NFPA 5000

The Task Group was informed that the FPRF report (Phase 1) will not be followed by a Phase 2 meant to further exploreinternational test methods of exterior walls. The June 2014 report should be considered the final report. Even without Phase 2,this report makes it clear that proper testing and construction compliance of exterior walls containing combustible componentsare critical to minimize risk of exterior wall fires.

The FPRF report has shown that, when buildings do not comply with adequate fire safety requirements for exterior walls, as isthe case in virtually all the examples of fires included in the report, serious fires can occur. No serious fires have been included inthe report for buildings protected in accordance with the IBC building code.

The Task Group has determined that the above language should be added to Chapter 37 of NFPA 5000 to ensure proper safetyand to further define testing requirements of exterior walls containing combustible components. The proposed wording is theresult of experience indicating that exterior wall assemblies containing combustible water-resistive barriers can cause severeflame spread even if the water-resistive barrier is the only combustible present. However, if the water-resistive barrier meetssome fire safety criteria as indicated in the proposed language (either by having been tested and meeting specific fire safetycriteria or by being covered by a named noncombustible wall covering), testing to NFPA 285 is not needed. Further, the proposedwording would exempt fenestration products and their flashings from being considered part of the water-resistive barrier. Theseadditions to Chapter 37 will clarify the fire testing requirements of exterior walls and bring the intent of NFPA 5000 in line with theintent of IBC Building Code.

This comment has been submitted on behalf of the Exterior Wall Task Group. Members include: Ben Caldwell (task group chair),John Harrington, Lee McCarthy, Jesse Beitel, Vickie Lovell, Thomas McKeon, Luke Woods, Marcelo Hirschler, Richard Davis,and Andy Williams.

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 37.1]

Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

17 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.


291 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


Harrington, John C.

Disagree on this and feel that FM 4880 should be included as an alternative choice to NFPA 285.

Holland, Joseph T.

This section comes from the IBC. It was originally written for walls where the EFIS is used. Unfortunately, the text will cause expensivetesting for other systems that have been in use for more than 50 years. During that time there is no history of these systems causing exteriorfire spread. One such system is walls utilizing fire-retardant-treated wood in both the bearing and nonbearing walls. This section needs morework before it should be adopted. Committee tried unsuccessfully to address these concerns. Recommend the action be reject but hold.


292 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

NFPA 5000 Exterior Wall Task Group Recommendations 37.1.5 Vertical and Lateral Flame Propagation on Exterior Nonbearing Walls.

37.1.5.1 Exterior nonbearing walls on buildings of Type I, II, III, or IV construction that are

greater than 40 ft (12192 mm) in height above grade plane shall be tested in accordance with

and meet the conditions of acceptance in NFPA 285 unless otherwise permitted in 37.1.5.2.

37.1.5.2 Where the water‐resistive barrier is the only combustible component, exterior

nonbearing walls shall not be required to be tested in accordance with 37.1.5.1 if either of the

following conditions apply:

(1) The exterior wall has a wall covering of masonry (including brick), concrete, stone,

terra cotta, stucco, or corrosion‐resistant steel with minimum thicknesses in accordance

with Table 37.1.5.2.

(2) The water‐resistive barrier complies with both of the following:

(a) The water‐resistive barrier has a peak heat release rate of less than 150 kW/m2, a total heat release of less than 20 MJ/m2, and an effective heat of combustion of less than 18 MJ/kg as determined in accordance with ASTM E1354. The ASTM E1354 test shall be conducted on specimens at the thickness intended for use, in the horizontal orientation and at an incident radiant heat flux of 50 kW/m2.

(b) The water‐resistive barrier has a flame spread index of 25 or less and a smoke‐developed index of 450 or less as determined in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723 with test specimen preparation and mounting in accordance with ASTM E2404.

37.1.5.3 For the purposes of 37.1.5, fenestration products and flashing of fenestration products shall not be considered part of the water‐resistive barrier.

Table 37.1.5.2 Minimum Thicknesses for Exterior Wall Covering Materials

Covering Type Minimum Thickness (inches)

Min. thickness (mm)

Masonry Anchored (including brick) Adhered

2.0 0.25

50.8 6.4

Steel (corrosion resistant) 0.0149 0.38

Stone Cast artificial, anchored Natural, adhered

1.5 2.0

38.1 50.8

Stucco or exterior cement plaster *

Three coat work‐over of 391

Metal plaster base Unit masonry Cast‐in‐place or precast concrete Two coat work‐over Unit masonry Cast‐in‐place or precast concrete

0.8750.625 0.625 0.500 0.375

22.2 15.9 15.9 12.7 9.5

Terra cotta Anchored Adhered

1.0 0.25

25.4 6.4

*Exclusive of texture.

of 391


38.9.7.8 Wind Requirements.

38.9.7.8.1

Through-fastened metal panel roof assemblies applied to a solid or closely fitted deck shall be tested for wind resistance inaccordance with one of the following applicable tests:

(1) ANSI/FM 4474, Standard for Evaluating the Simulated Wind Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies Using Static Positive and/orNegative Differential Pressures

(2) UL 580, Standard for Tests for Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies

(3) UL 1897, Standard for Uplift Tests for Roof Covering Systems

38.9.7.8.2*

Except as noted in 38.9.7.8.3, where the roof functions as the roof deck and roof covering and provides both weather protection andsupport for loads, the structural metal panel roof system shall be tested for wind resistance in accordance with this section.Structural standing seam metal panel roof systems shall be tested in accordance with ASTM E1592, Standard Test Method forStructural Performance of Sheet Metal Roof and Siding Systems by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference, or FM Approval4474 ANSI/FM 4474 , Standard for Evaluating the Simulated Wind Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies Using Static Positive and/orNegative Differential Pressures. Structural through-fastened panel roof systems shall be tested in accordance with one of thefollowing:

(1) ASTM E1592

(2) FM Approval 4474 ANSI/FM 4474

(3) UL 580, Standard for Tests for Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies

38.9.7.8.3

Metal roofs constructed of cold-formed steel, shall be permitted to be designed and tested in accordance with the applicablereferenced structural design standard in Section 44.7.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 34 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs theTC on Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Negative ballot of Harrington and add the ANSIdesignation to the referenced FM Approval 4474 document title in two locations.


ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



293 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


294 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


41.6.3.1

A vapor retarder having a perm rating not exceeding 0.5 1 or a 6 10 mil (0.15 0.25 mm) thickness of polyethylene shall be placedbetween the top of the subgrade or base material and the bottom of the slab.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Look at CI 7513

Response Message:

Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.


295 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


296 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


44.3.1 General.

Systems of structural steel members acting compositely with reinforced concrete shall be designed in accordance with AISC 360and ACI 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, excluding ACI 318, Building Code Requirements for StructuralConcrete , Chapter 22. Chapter 14, and AISC 360, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The ACI 318 edition referenced in NFPA 5000, Chapter 2, has been updated to 2014. The provisions for plain concretewere moved from ACI 318-11, Chapter 22, to ACI 318-14, Chapter 14. This comment simply corrects that reference.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.


297 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


298 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


44.4 Open Web Steel Joists and Joist Girders.

The design, manufacture, and use of open web steel joists and joist girders shall be in accordance with SJI-100, StandardSpecification for K-Series, LH-Series, and DLH-Series Open Web Steel Joists and for Joist Girders, or SJI-200, StandardSpecification for Composite Steel Joists, CJ-Series .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This comment fixes Section 44.4 to reflect the original text from PI 205. The full title of SJI 100 was truncated in the firstrevision. Additionally, the reference to SJI CJ was accidentally eliminated. It should have been retained, since SJI 100 doesnot cover composite steel joists. Finally, the 2016 edition of the composite steel joist standard has been renamed to SJI-200.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.


299 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


300 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


44.6.1

Steel This subsection shall apply to steel storage racks shall that include, but are not be limited to, pallet storage racks, selectiveracks, movable-shelf racks, rack-supported systems, automated storage and retrieval systems (stacker racks), push-back racks,pallet-flow racks, case-flow racks, pick modules, and rack-supported platforms.

44.6.2

Steel storage racks shall not include other types of racks, where such other racks are classified as drive-in or drive-through racks,cantilever racks, or portable racks, or where parts of such racks are made of materials other than steel.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

These first two sections were adapted by the BLD-SCM from a definition proposed for Steel Storage Racks. Themodifications proposed in this comment are editorial and intended to improve the clarity of the section.

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 109-NFPA 5000-2016 [Sections 44.6.1, 44.6.2]

Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)


301 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


302 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


44.8.1 Structural Members.

The For cold-formed steel light-frame construction, the design and installation of the following structural framing systems, includingtheir members and connections utilized in cold-formed steel light frame construction applications , shall be in accordance with AISIS240, North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing, and 44.8.1.1 and 44.8.1.2 , as applicable: .

(1) Floor and roof systems

(2) Structural walls

(3) Shear walls, strap-braced walls, and diaphragms to resist in-plane lateral loads

(4) Trusses

44.8.1.1 Seismic Requirements for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Systems.

Seismic Requirements for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Systems. Where a response modification coefficient, R , in accordancewith ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , Table 12.2-1, is used for the design of cold-formedsteel light frame construction, the cold-formed steel structural members and connections in the seismic force-resisting systems anddiaphragms of buildings and other structures shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of AISI S400,North American Standard for Seismic Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Systems .The design of cold-formed steel light-frameconstruction to resist seismic forces shall be in accordance with the provisions of 44.8.1.1.1 or 44.8.1.1.2 , as applicable.

44.8.1.1.1 Seismic Design Categories B and C.

44.8.1.1.1.1

Where Except as permitted in 44.8.1.1.1.2 , when a response modification coefficient, R, in accordance with Table 12.2-1 ofASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Table 12.2-1, is used for the design of cold-formed steellight- frame construction, the cold-formed steel structural members and connections in assigned to seismic design category B or C,the seismic force-resisting systems and diaphragms of buildings and other structures system shall be designed andconstructed detailed in accordance with the requirements of AISI S400, North American Standard for Seismic Design ofCold-Formed Steel Structural Systems

44.8.1.1.1.2

Response modifications for coefficient, R , for "Steel systems not specifically detailed for seismic resistance excluding cantilevercolumn systems" per Table 12.2-1in ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , shall be permittedfor systems designed and detailed in accordance with AISI S240, North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel StructuralFraming , and need not be designed and detailed in accordance with AISI S400, North American Standard for Seismic Design ofCold-Formed Steel Structural Systems .

44.8.1.1.2 Seismic Design Categories D through F.

In cold-formed steel light-frame construction assigned to seismic design category D, E, or F, the seismic force-resisting systemshall be designed and detailed in accordance with AISI S400, North American Standard for Seismic Design of Cold-Formed SteelStructural Systems .

44.8.1.2 Prescriptive Framing.

Detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses, less than or equal to three stories in height, shall be permitted to beconstructed in accordance with AISI S230, Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing – Prescriptive Method for One- and Two-FamilyDwellings, subject to the limitations therein.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The technical committee modified the proposed language by deleting the exception and re-wording the text without theexception to conform with the NFPA Manual of Style.

ResponseMessage:



303 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


Manley, Bonnie E.

The AISI Committee on Framing Standards recently completed Supplement 1-16 to AISI S400-15. The supplement addresses a publiccomment received from California’s Division of the State Architect (DSA) by revising the expected strength factors for cold-formed steellight-frame shear walls sheathed with wood structural panels, steel sheet sheathing, gypsum board, or fiberboard panel sheathing. Theappropriate reference for inclusion in NFPA Chapter 2 would be: AISI S400 S400-15/S1-16, North American Standard for Seismic Design ofCold-Formed Steel Structural Systems, 2015, with Supplement 1, dated 2016.


304 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 7509-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 47.2.1.4.4.2 ]

47.2.1.4.4.2

Structural cold-formed steel studs and track shall comply with AISI S240, North American Standard for Cold-Formed SteelStructural Framing.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 36 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs theTC on Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Affirmative with

Comment ballot of Manley and reference the complete title of AISI S240 as follows: AISI S240, North American Standardfor Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing


ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 36-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 47.2.1.4.4.2]

Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.



305 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


306 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


55.1.4.2*

Where required by another section of this Code, and where two or more fire protection or life safety systems are integrated withother building systems and equipment , the integrated systems shall be tested system test shall verify the proper operation andfunction of such systems in accordance with NFPA 4.


Submitter Full Name: BLD-BSF


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The intent of this proposal is to clarify when integrated testing of fire protection systems is required. The challenge in writing aspecific requirement for testing of integrated systems is ensuring that required testing of integrated features is scaled in amanner that is reasonable for a wide range of applications. The revised language addresses this concern.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Chen, Flora F.

Donga, Paul M.

Klepitch, David L.

Klinker, Richard L.

Noveh, James

Reiss, Martin H.

Szmanda, Michael R.

Affirmative All

Bradley, Harry L.

Brock, Pat D.

Dale, Stephen E.

Dempsey, Bryan

Grill, Raymond A.

Hammerberg, Thomas P.

Hutton, Claude O.

Jardin, Joseph M.


307 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Kellett, Michael

Killian, David A.

Lazarz, Daniel J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nuschler, Gary L.

Panowitz, Scott E.

Reiswig, Rodger


Shudak, Lawrence J.

Warner, Todd W.

Wren, Carl D.

Wyatt, David M.


Hugo, Jeffrey M.

The negative ballot is cast for several reasons. The result of the proposed text is far reaching and will have multiple and inconsistentoutcomes when it is enforced by local authorities having jurisdiction. Testing systems to ensure function is not the issue here, but the lack ofextracting appropriate and key definitions from NFPA 4 and clarifications on how NFPA 4 interacts with NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 is. Theterm "integrated system" is not defined in NFPA 101 and the definition in NFPA 4 is very unclear as to the extent of the testing, especially asexplained by the annex text (A.3.3.12.1.3) in NFPA 4. Furthermore, the life safety system and fire protection system is also not defined inNFPA 101 or NFPA 5000. These definitions are important to go forward with this language to provide uniform enforcement. Having thethreshold set at "...two of more...systems" to initiate NFPA 4 is too low. It is very important to note that if this proposal goes forward, it willconflict with the other model building and fire codes (IBC/IFC, proposal F145-16) that are developing their 2018 editions. The IFC/IBC islimiting NFPA 4 to high rise buildings (as is the First Draft Report, NFPA 101, Section 11.8.9) and where smoke control systems areintegrated. It is common in several states that the IBC and NFPA 101 is used across multiple jurisdictions. Having conflicting requirementsbetween the documents is not new, but the extent of testing integrated systems should be consistent for building owners, contractors, andauthorities having jurisdiction.

Larrimer, Peter A.

See my negative comment on NFPA 101 SR-1002


308 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


55.2.3.7

Audible alarm notification appliances shall be of such character and so distributed as to be heard above the average ambient soundlevel that exists under normal conditions of occupancy notification appliances shall comply with NFPA 72 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Changes were made to NFPA 101 because 101 addresses existing systems. No changes were needed in NFPA 5000.Previous edition text was retained because it is appropriate for this document.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Chen, Flora F.

Donga, Paul M.

Klepitch, David L.

Klinker, Richard L.

Noveh, James

Reiss, Martin H.

Szmanda, Michael R.

Affirmative All

Bradley, Harry L.

Brock, Pat D.

Dale, Stephen E.

Dempsey, Bryan

Grill, Raymond A.


Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Hutton, Claude O.


309 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jardin, Joseph M.

Kellett, Michael

Killian, David A.

Larrimer, Peter A.

Lazarz, Daniel J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nuschler, Gary L.

Panowitz, Scott E.

Reiswig, Rodger


Shudak, Lawrence J.

Warner, Todd W.

Wren, Carl D.

Wyatt, David M.


310 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


55.13* Risk Analysis for Mass Notification Systems.

55.13.1 Where Required.

Where required by another section of this Code , a risk analysis for mass notification systems shall be provided in accordancewith the requirements of NFPA 72 and the provisions of 55.13.2 through 55.13.4 .

55.13.2 Considerations.

The risk analysis required by 55.13.1 shall additionally address all of the following considerations:

Fire and non-fire emergencies

Specific nature and anticipated risks of each facility

Characteristics of associated buildings, areas, spaces, campuses, equipment, and operations

55.13.3 Emergency Communications System.

An emergency communications system in accordance with NFPA 72 shall be provided where the need for such a system isidentified by the risk analysis required by 55.13.1 , commensurate with the likelihood, vulnerability, magnitude, and potentialconsequences of emergencies.

55.13.4 Emergency Action Plan.

The completed emergency action plan shall be used for the design guideline for the mass notification/emergency communicationssystem.


55.13.1.1

Where required by Chapters 11 through 43 , a risk analysis for mass notification systems shall be provided in accordance withthe requirements of Chapter 24 of NFPA 72 , and the provisions of 55.13.2 through 55.13.3 .

55.13.1.2

Where a mass notification system is required by the risk analysis in 55.13.1.1 , the system shall be in accordance with therequirements of Chapter 24 of NFPA 72 .

55.13.2 Purpose.

55.13.2.1

The purpose of the mass notification system shall be to communicate information about emergencies, including, but not limited to,fire, human-caused events (accidental and intentional), other dangerous situations, accidents, and natural disasters.

55.13.2.2

The purpose of the emergency action plan (EAP) for the mass notification system shall be to identify the mass notification systemdesign and performance requirements in accordance with the results of the risk analysis.

55.13.3 Documentation.

55.13.3.1

The emergency action plan, risk assessment report, and accompanying documentation shall be submitted to the authority havingjurisdiction by the registered design professional (RDP). The format and content of the documentation shall be acceptable to theauthority having jurisdiction.

55.13.3.2*

Where required by the authority having jurisdiction, an independent review of the emergency action plan, risk assessment, and theaccompanying documentation by one or more individuals possessing expertise in risk characterization for accidental andintentional hazards shall be performed.



BSF_Section_55.13.docx mass notification section 55.13--with Annex




Street Address:

City:


311 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Revisions to the new section on mass notification were made to reflect the submitted public comments, including the option tomove this material to an adoptable annex. This new section provides direction for occupancy chapters to consider a risk analysisrelative to the need for mass notification systems. This section does not require mass notification systems, it only provides theoption for the risk analysis. Where the risk analysis and resulting action plan identifies a need for a mass notification system,NFPA 72 shall be used for design and installation requirements. Mass notification systems are not limited to active shooterevents, they are also used for natural disasters, or other dangerous situations. During the First Draft, the TC asked the CC toreview the scope of the committee to reflect these changes. At this time, the TC does not see a need to revise the scope.

CC Note No. 38 sent this PC to all of the occupancy committees. The following responses are from the other occupancycommittees:

BCF: The Board and Care committee reviewed the requirements in Chapter 9 as modified during the Second Draft. Theprovisions for a risk analysis/mass notification should not apply to board and care facilities.

ResponseMessage:

Public Comment No. 38-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 55.12]


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Chen, Flora F.

Donga, Paul M.

Klepitch, David L.

Klinker, Richard L.

Noveh, James

Reiss, Martin H.

Szmanda, Michael R.

Affirmative All

Bradley, Harry L.

Brock, Pat D.

Dale, Stephen E.

Dempsey, Bryan

Grill, Raymond A.


Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Hutton, Claude O.

Jardin, Joseph M.

Kellett, Michael

Killian, David A.

Lazarz, Daniel J.


312 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nuschler, Gary L.

Panowitz, Scott E.

Reiswig, Rodger


Shudak, Lawrence J.

Warner, Todd W.

Wren, Carl D.

Wyatt, David M.


Larrimer, Peter A.

See my negative comment on NFPA 101 SR-1005.


313 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

55.13* Risk Analysis for Mass Notification Systems.

A.55.13 This section does not require mass notification systems, it only provides direction for the risk analysis. Where the risk analysis and resulting action plan identifies a need for a mass notification system, NFPA 72 should be used for design and installation requirements.


55.13.1.1 Where required by Chapters 11 through 43, a risk analysis for mass notification systems shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 72, Chapter 24 and the provisions of 55.13.2 through 55.13.3.

55.13.1.2 Where a mass notification system is required by the risk analysis in 55.13.1.1, the system shall be in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 72, Chapter 24.

55.13.2 Purpose.

55.13.2.1 The purpose of the mass notification system shall be to communicate information about emergencies including, but not limited to, fire, human-caused events (accidental and intentional), other dangerous situations, accidents, and natural disasters.

55.13.2.2 The purpose of the emergency action plan for the mass notification system shall be to identify the mass notification system design and performance requirements in accordance with the results of the risk analysis.

55.13.3 Documentation.

55.13.3.1 The emergency action plan, risk assessment report, and accompanying documentation shall be submitted to the authority having jurisdiction by the registered design professional (RDP). The format and content of the documentation shall be acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.

55.13.3.2* Where required by the authority having jurisdiction, an independent review of the emergency action plan, risk assessment, and the accompanying documentation by one or more individuals possessing expertise in risk characterization for accidental and intentional hazards shall be performed.

A.55.13.3.2 These peer reviews should focus on the assumptions and methods of analysis used and on the findings. Peer reviewers should submit written assessment reports to the AHJ.

of 391

Second Revision No. 4013-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.5.4.3.3 ]

A.5.4.3.3

The four basic characteristics — sensibility, reactivity, mobility, and susceptibility — comprise a minimum, exhaustive set of mutuallyexclusive performance characteristics of people in buildings that can affect a building's ability to meet the goals, objectives, andperformance criteria of this Code. The characteristics are briefly described as follows:

(1) Sensibility (to physical cues) is the ability to sense the sounding of an alarm and can also include discernment anddiscrimination of visual and olfactory cues in addition to auditory emanations from an event itself.

(2) Reactivity (ability to interpret cues correctly and take appropriate action) can be a function of cognitive capacity, speed orinstinctive reaction, or group dynamics, and the reliability or likelihood of a wrong decision, such as in situations wherefamiliarity with the premises influences wayfinding, might need to be considered.

(3) Mobility (speed of movement) is determined by individual capabilities as well as crowding phenomena, such as arching atdoorways.

(4) Susceptibility (to products of combustion) includes metabolism, lung capacity, pulmonary disease, allergies, or other physicallimitations that affect survivability during a building emergency.

In application, as with the use of computer evacuation models, assumptions can address a larger number of factors that arecomponents of these basic response characteristics. Examples are shown in Table A.5.4.3.3.

For a more detailed explanation of occupant characteristics, see the SFPE Engineering Guide to Predicting Human HumanBehavior in Fire. Occupant characteristics that are discussed in the guide include the following:

(1) Population numbers and density

(2) Lone occupant or with others

(3) Familiarity with the building

(4) Distribution and activities

(5) Alertness

(6) Physical and cognitive ability

(7) Social affiliation

(8) Role and responsibility

(9) Location

(10) Commitment

(11) Focal point

(12) Occupant condition

(13) Gender

(14) Culture

(15) Age

Table A.5.4.3.3 Examples of Response Characteristics

Characteristic Example

Alertness Awake/asleep; can depend on time of day

Responsiveness Ability to sense cues and react

Commitment Degree to which occupant is committed to an activity underway before the alarm

Focal pointPoint at which an occupant's attention is focused; for example, front of classroom, stage, or server inbusiness environment

Physical and mentalcapabilities

Can affect ability to sense, to respond, and to react to cues; might be related to age or disability

Role Can determine whether occupant will lead or follow others

Familiarity Can depend on time spent in building or participation in emergency training

Social affiliation Extent to which an occupant will act/react as an individual or as a member of a group

ConditionOver the course of the fire, the effects — both physiological and psychological — of the fire and itscombustion products on each occupant





314 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Editorial comment. Name of SFPE Guide was incorrect.

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 101-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. A.5.4.3.3]

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.


315 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Wydeveld, Steven F.


316 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 3510-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.8.10.2(2) ]

A.8.10.2(2)

The provision for terminating the smoke partition at the ceiling is not intended to prevent the wall from extending above the ceiling.

An architectural, exposed, suspended-grid acoustical tile ceiling with penetrations for sprinklers, ducted HVAC supply and return airdiffusers, speakers, and recessed light fixtures is capable of limiting the transfer of smoke.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In response to the Correlating Committee, the addition of annex text provides guidance on smoke partition construction .The language correlates with occupancy chapter requirements for smoke partition construction.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.

Hopper, Howard


317 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



318 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 3516-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.8.12.5.1(3) ]

A.8.12.5.1(3)

The intent of this requirement is to provide the same separation as required for corridor walls of the applicable occupancy chapter.For example, a convenience opening on one floor in a health care occupancy would be required to be separated from the corridorand areas open to the corridor on the adjacent floor by a barrier that limits the transfer of smoke, in accordance with 19.3.6.2.3 , nota 1-hour rated wall with opening protectives.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

In response to Public Comment No. 13 (CC Note No. 15) the referenced section is being updated to Section19.3.6.2.3

Response Message:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

9 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Butcher, Richard C.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Devlin, John F.

Dudley, Jeffry T.

Gerdes, Ralph D.


Jones, Adam C.

Kim, Young H.


Affirmative All

Cahanin, Gregory J.

Francis, Sam W.


Gump, Jack A.

Hall, William J.


319 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Waymon

Klein, Marshall A.

Koffel, William E.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Morin, Kevin D.

Morris, Jeramie W.

Roeper, Kurt A.

Shino, Gregory K.



320 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


A.11.2.1.6

None of the special locking arrangements addressed in 11.2.1.6 are intended to permit credentialed egress, request to exit, orsimilar provisions where an occupant cannot leave the building without swiping a card through a reader. Where such anarrangement is desired to keep track of occupants, the swiping of cards needs to be procedural but not necessary for releasing thedoor lock or latch. Free egress needs to be available at all times. Another option to free egress is the use of a delayed-egresselectrically electrical locking system.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision responds to CC Note 16.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

28 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Pappas, Denise L.

Simard, J. Francois

Affirmative All

Alles, Ryan

Badeau, Charles A.

Barlow, Charles V.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Chan, Mark

Collins, David S.

Crowley, Michael A.

Day, Richard L.

Dove, Paul L.

Frable, David W.

Guest, Rita C.


Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)


321 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jackson, Waymon

Lampella, Gary

Lathrop, James K.


Nuschler, Gary L.

Pauls, Jake

Peacock, Richard D.

Perry, Robert R.

Quinterno, Vincent

Saks, Kenneth


Shulman, Michael S.

Tierney, Michael

Versteeg, Joseph H.

de Vries, David A.

Abstention

Di Pilla, Steven

-


322 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 5001-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.19.3.6.1(1) ]

A.19.3.6.1(1)

The intent is also to permit a space that is compliant with the provisions of 19.3.6.1(1) to be considered open to the corridor eventhough it is physically separated from the corridor by walls and doors. The walls and doors would not need to comply with 19.3.6.2through 19.3.6.5. For example, doors would be permitted without a latch or with a louvre louver .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Responds to correlating committee note CCN-26.

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. A.19.3.6.1(1)]

Ballot Results


25 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

23 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Harmeyer, Robert J.

Pethe, Ben

Affirmative All

Bush, Kenneth E.

Crowley, Michael A.

Dannaway, Samuel S.

Davy, Matthew W.

Epstein, Alice L.

Farraher, Martin J.

Furdell, Gary


Gleason, Eric

Harris, Donald W.

Hood, David R.

Horeis, Richard M.

Klein, David P.

Koffel, William E.


323 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Merrill II, James

Prediger, G. Brian

Rickard, John A.


Schmitt, Dennis L.

Schultz, Terry



Worley, Fred


324 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


A.27.4.4.6.2

Where a pedestrian way meets the requirements for a public way, the means of egress from each tenant space or building ispermitted to terminate at the pedestrian way. For those arrangements, the pedestrian way would not be considered to be a portion ofthe means of egress.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Mercantile and Business Occupancies (MER) to relocate the annex languagecurrently showing as A.27.4.5.2 (bulk merchandising) to A.27.4.4.5.2 (malls.) The asterisk is showing in the correct location inthe FR text that was balloted but incorrectly in the draft. This CN is related to FR 6511.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


27 Eligible Voters

4 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Burrus, William J.

Donovan, Scott

Jacobs, Scott

Martin, Jeff

Affirmative All

Aaby, Mark J.

Bellamy, Tracey D.

Bush, Kenneth E.

Cole, Anthony W.

Dawe, Nicholas A.

Derr, Kevin L.

Dodge, David A.

Frable, David W.


325 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Freels, Douglas R.

Garzone, Joseph R.

Gauvin, Daniel J.


Humble, Jonathan

Jackson, Ricky R.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Schultz, Terry

Shirey, Jeffrey

Smith, James B.

Stocker, Warren G.


Vosicky, John

Yonkers, Ernest D.


Rice, Sarah A.

I agree with the comments made. A requirement for a grab bar in a shower belongs in a plumbing code.


326 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


A.32.2.4.1

See ASCE Guide for Tensioned Tensile Fabric Structures: Design, Analysis, and Construction .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This reference should have been updated as part of the modification to Section 32.2.4 in FR7504.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


21 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Houser, Karl D.

Htway, Tin

Affirmative All



Collins, David S.

Feid, Jeffrey

Fitch, William E.

Graham, Mark S.

Harrington, John C.


Holland, Joseph T.

Hu, Xianxu (Sherri)

Kaplan, Moriel E.

Manley, Bonnie E.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nesvold, Scott

Rotondo, Jason D.


327 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Schmeida, Michael

Tyree, David P.

Versteeg, Joseph H.

Willse, Peter J.


328 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


A.55.1.4.2

It is also recommended that NFPA 4 requires that integrated fire protection and life safety systems be fire protection and life safetysystems be commissioned in accordance with NFPA 3 periodically retested as specified in the integrated system test plan. Inaddition, for existing systems, an integrated system test plan must be developed within 5 years of adoption of NFPA 4 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The current annex language refers to NFPA 3, Recommended Practice for Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life SafetySystems as annex material for integrated fire protection and life safety system testing. NFPA 3 is not germane to the subjectmatter. The subject new proposed annex language is more appropriate for integrated fire protection and life safety systemtesting.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Chen, Flora F.

Donga, Paul M.

Klepitch, David L.

Klinker, Richard L.

Noveh, James

Reiss, Martin H.

Szmanda, Michael R.

Affirmative All

Bradley, Harry L.

Brock, Pat D.

Dale, Stephen E.

Dempsey, Bryan

Grill, Raymond A.


Hutton, Claude O.


329 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jardin, Joseph M.

Kellett, Michael

Killian, David A.

Larrimer, Peter A.

Lazarz, Daniel J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Nuschler, Gary L.

Panowitz, Scott E.

Reiswig, Rodger


Shudak, Lawrence J.

Warner, Todd W.

Wren, Carl D.

Wyatt, David M.


Hugo, Jeffrey M.

See Negative ballot of SR-1502


330 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 4032-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. G.1.1 ]


331 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

G.1.1 NFPA Publications.


332 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 1, Fire Code, 2018 edition.

NFPA 3, Recommended Practice for Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems, 2018 edition.

NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers, 2017 edition.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 13D, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and Manufactured Homes, 2016edition.

NFPA 13R, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Low-Rise Residential Occupancies, 2013 2016 edition.

NFPA 14 , Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems , 2016 edition.

NFPA 15, Standard for Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection, 2017 edition.

NFPA 22, Standard for Water Tanks for Private Fire Protection, 2013 edition.

NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2018 edition.

NFPA 30A, Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages, 2018 edition.

NFPA 30B, Code for the Manufacture and Storage of Aerosol Products, 2015 edition.

NFPA 45, Standard on Fire Protection for Laboratories Using Chemicals, 2015 edition.

NFPA 55, Compressed Gases and Cryogenic Fluids Code, 2013 2016 edition.

NFPA 58, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, 2014 2017 edition.

NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities, 2013 2017edition.

NFPA 68, Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, 2016 edition.

NFPA 70®, National Electrical Code®, 2017 edition.

NFPA 72®, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2016 edition.

NFPA 80, Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, 2016 edition.

NFPA 80A, Recommended Practice for Protection of Buildings from Exterior Fire Exposures, 2017 edition.

NFPA 82 , Standard on Incinerators and Waste and Linen Handling Systems and Equipment , 2014 edition.

NFPA 88A, Standard for Parking Structures , 2015 edition.

NFPA 88A, Standard for Parking Structures, 2015 edition.

NFPA 90A, Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning and Ventilating Systems, 2018 edition.

NFPA 92, Standard for Smoke Control Systems, 2015 edition.

NFPA 96, Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations, 2017 edition.

NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code, 2018 edition.

NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®, 2018 edition.

NFPA 101A, Guide on Alternative Approaches to Life Safety, 2016 edition.

NFPA 101M, Alternative Approaches to Life Safety, 1988 edition.

NFPA 105, Standard for Smoke Door Assemblies and Other Opening Protectives, 2016 edition.

NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 120, Standard for Fire Prevention and Control in Coal Mines, 2015 edition.

NFPA 170, Standard for Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols, 2015 edition.

NFPA 204, Standard for Smoke and Heat Venting, 2015 edition.

NFPA 211, Standard for Chimneys, Fireplaces, Vents, and Solid Fuel–Burning Appliances, 2016 edition.

NFPA 220, Standard on Types of Building Construction, 2018 edition.

NFPA 251 , Standard Methods of Tests of Fire Resistance of Building Construction and Materials , 2006 edition, withdrawn.

NFPA 252, Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2017 edition.

NFPA 253, Standard Method of Test for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2015edition.

NFPA 257, Standard on Fire Test for Window and Glass Block Assemblies, 2017 edition.

NFPA 259, Standard Test Method for Potential Heat of Building Materials, 2013 edition.

NFPA 262 , Standard Method of Test for Flame Travel and Smoke of Wires and Cables for Use in Air-Handling Spaces , 2015edition.

NFPA 265, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating Room Fire Growth Contribution of Textile or Expanded Vinyl WallCoverings on Full Height Panels and Walls , 2015 edition.


333 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

NFPA 265, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating Room Fire Growth Contribution of Textile or Expanded Vinyl WallCoverings on Full Height Panels and Walls, 2015 edition.

NFPA 269, Standard Test Method for Developing Toxic Potency Data for Use in Fire Hazard Modeling, 2017 edition.

NFPA 275, Standard Method of Fire Tests for the Evaluation of Thermal Barriers, 2017 edition.

NFPA 285, Standard Fire Test Method for Evaluation of Fire Propagation Characteristics of Exterior Non-Load-Bearing WallAssemblies Containing Combustible Components, 2017 edition.

NFPA 286, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating Contribution of Wall and Ceiling Interior Finish to Room Fire Growth, 2015edition.

NFPA 400, Hazardous Materials Code, 2016 edition.

NFPA 409, Standard on Aircraft Hangars, 2016 edition.

NFPA 551, Guide for the Evaluation of Fire Risk Assessments, 2016 edition.

NFPA 555, Guide on Methods for Evaluating Potential for Room Flashover, 2017 edition.

NFPA 654, Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling ofCombustible Particulate Solids, 2017 edition.

NFPA 664, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Processing and Woodworking Facilities, 2017 edition.

NFPA 701, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Flame Propagation of Textiles and Films, 2015 edition.

NFPA 703, Standard for Fire Retardant–Treated Wood and Fire-Retardant Coatings for Building Materials, 2018 edition.

NFPA 720, Standard for the Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detection and Warning Equipment, 2018 edition.

NFPA 850, Recommended Practice for Fire Protection for Electric Generating Plants and High Voltage Direct Current ConverterStations, 2015 edition.

NFPA 909, Code for the Protection of Cultural Resource Properties — Museums, Libraries, and Places of Worship, 2017 edition.

NFPA 914, Code for Fire Protection of Historic Structures, 2015 edition.

NFPA 1122, Code for Model Rocketry, 2018 edition.

NFPA 1144, Standard for Reducing Structure Ignition Hazards from Wildland Fire, 2018 edition.

NFPA 1221, Standard for the Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Emergency Services Communications Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA Fire Protection Handbook®, 20th edition.

Fire Protection Research Foundation, Development of an Enhanced Hazard Classification System for Oxidizers, National OxidizingPool Chemicals Storage Fire Test Project Development of an Enhanced Hazard Classification System for Oxidizers , 1998 2006 .

Fire Protection Research Foundation, National Oxidizing Pool Chemicals Storage Fire Test Project , 1998.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates referenced NFPA publications.

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 66-NFPA 5000-2016 [Chapter G]

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


334 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


335 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 4014-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. G.1.2.2 ]

G.1.2.2 AISC Publications.

American Institute of Steel Construction, One East Wacker Drive, 130 E. Randolph St., Suite 3100 Suite 2000 , Chicago, IL60601-2001 .

AISC DG02, Design Guide 2: Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings, 2003.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This comment simply updates the address for AISC to match that in Chapter 2.

Response Message:

Public Comment No. 112-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. G.1.2.2]

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan


336 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


337 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.4 ASCE Publications.

American Society of Civil Engineers, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400.

ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,2010 2016 with Supplement 1, 2017 .

ASCE/SEI 24, Flood Resistant Design and Construction, 2014.

ASCE/SEI 49, Wind Tunnel Testing for Buildings and Other Structures , 2012.

ASCE/SEI 31, Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings, 2003.

ASCE/SFPE 29, Standard Calculation Methods for Structural Fire Protection,2007 2017 .

ASCE 41 , Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings Tensile Fabric Structures: Design, Analysis, and Construction , 2013.(Supercedes FEMA 356)

ASCE Guide for Tensioned Fabric Structure, 1996.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This comment cleans up the ASCE references. ASCE 31 and ASCE 41 are no longer referenced in Annex A as a result ofFR6079. Additionally, the main body of NFPA 5000 is adopting the 2016 edition of ASCE 7, so the references in the Annexesneed to be updated as well. Finally, the reference to the Tensile Fabric Structures guide has also been updated as publiccomment 113.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All



338 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


Frable, David W.

Based on the negative comment from Mr. Humble, this subject should be revisited through the technical correlating committee.

Humble, Jonathan

Please see PDF file titled "NFPA-5000-SR-4005-4015-2016-10-4-AISI-Negative".


339 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.8 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D56, Standard Test Method for Flash Point by Tag Closed Tester, 2005, reapproved 2010.

ASTM D86, Standard Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products at Atmospheric Pressure, 2012 2015 .

ASTM D93, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Pensky-Martens Closed Cup Tester, 2015 2015a .

ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials, 2006, reapproved2011 2015 .

ASTM D3278, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point of Liquids by Small Scale Closed-Cup Apparatus, 1996, reapproved 2011.

ASTM D3828, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Small Scale Closed Cup Tester, 2012a.

ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2013, 2015a 2015b .

ASTM E96/E96M, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials, 2014 2016 .

ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2014 2016 .

ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat EnergySource,2014c 2015e1 .

ASTM E736 E736/E736M , Standard Test Method for Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials Applied to StructuralMembers, 2000, reapproved 2011 2015e1 .

ASTM E814, Standard Test Method for Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops, 2013a.

ASTM E1354, Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials and Products Using an OxygenConsumption Calorimeter , 2009, reapproved 2016.

ASTM E1472, Standard Guide for Documenting Computer Software for Fire Models, 2007 (withdrawn 2011).

ASTM E1592, Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Sheet Metal Roof and Siding Systems by Uniform Static AirPressure Difference, 2005, reapproved 2012 .

ASTM E1886, Standard Test Method for Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, Doors and Storm Shutters Impacted byMissile(s) and Exposed to Cyclic Pressure Differentials , 2013.

ASTM E1966, Standard Test Method for Fire-Resistive Joint Systems,2007, reapproved 2011 2015 .

ASTM E1996-14a, Standard Specification for Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, Doors and Storm ShuttersImpacted by Windborne Debris in Hurricanes , 2014.

ASTM E2030, Guide for Recommended Uses of Photoluminescent (Phosphorescent) Safety Markings, 2009a.

ASTM E2174, Standard Practice for On-Site Inspection of Installed Fire Stops, 2014b.

ASTM E2238, Standard Guide for Evacuation Route Diagrams , 2012.

ASTM E2280, Standard Guide for Fire Hazard Assessment of the Effect of Upholstered Seating Furniture within Patient Rooms ofHealth Care Facilities, 2013.

ASTM E2307, Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance of Perimeter Fire Barrier Systems Using Intermediate-Scale,Multi-Story Test Apparatus, 2015a 2015b .

ASTM E2393, Standard Practice for On-Site Inspection of Installed Fire Resistive Joint Systems and Perimeter Fire Barriers, 2010a,reapproved 2015 .

ASTM E2484, Standard Specification for High Multi -Rise Story Building External Evacuation Controlled Descent Devices, 2008,reapproved 2015 .

ASTM E2513, Standard Specification for Multi-Story Building External Evacuation Platform Rescue Systems, 2007, reapproved2012.

ASTM F1637, Standard Practice for Safe Walking Surfaces, 2013.

ASTM F1677, Standard Test Method for Using a Portable Inclinable Articulated Strut Tester (PIAST), withdrawn last edition, 2005.

ASTM F1679, Standard Test Method for Using a Variable Incidence Tribometer (VIT), withdrawn last edition, 2004.




Street Address:

City:

State:


340 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates ASTM referenced publications.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


341 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.9 AWC Publications.

American Wood Council, 803 Sycolin Road 222 Catoctin Circle SE , Suite 201, Leesburg, VA 20175.

AWC PWF, Permanent Wood Foundation Design Specification, 2015.

AWC Manual for Engineered Wood Construction, 2005 2015 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates address and referenced publication.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris


342 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


343 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.10 BHMA Publications.

Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association, 355 Lexington Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10017-6603.

ANSI/ BHMA/ANSI A156.10, Power Operated Pedestrian Doors, 2011.

ANSI/ BHMA/ANSI A156.19, Power Assist and & Low Energy Power Operated Doors,2002 2013 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates referenced BHMA publication.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris


344 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


345 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.12 FM Global Publications.

FM Global, 270 Central Avenue, P.O. Box 7500, Johnston, RI 02919.

FM Data Sheet 1-22, Maximum Foreseeable Loss, 2014.

FM Data Sheet 1-23, Fire Barriers and Protection of Openings, 2012.

FM Data Sheet 1-29, Roof Deck Securement and Above-Deck Roof Components, 2010.

FM Data Sheet 1-49, Perimeter Flashing, 2009.

FM Approval 4450, Class 1 Insulated Steel Deck Roofs, 1989.

ANSI/ FM Approval 4470, Single-ply, Polymer-Modified Bitumen Sheet, Built-Up Roof (BUR) and Liquid Applied Roof Assemblies foruse in Class 1 and Noncombustible Roof Deck Construction, 2012.

FM Approval 4471, Class 1 Panel Roofs, 2010.

FM Approval 4473, Test Standard for Impact Resistance Testing of Rigid Roofing Materials by Impacting with Freezer Ice Balls ,2011.

ANSI/FM 4476, Approval Standard for Flexible Photovoltaic Modules , 2014.

ANSI/FM 4478, Approval Standard for Rigid Photovoltaic Modules , 2014.

FM Approval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials or Coatings, andExterior Wall Systems, 2010 2015 .

FM Data Sheet 1-29, Roof Deck Securement and Above-Deck Roof Components Above-Deck Roof Components , 2010.

FM Data Sheet 1-49, Perimeter Flashing, 2009.

FM Global Property Loss Prevention Data Sheet 1-15, “Roof Mounted Solar Photovoltaic Panels,” 2014.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: FM Global References

Editorial correction.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew



346 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


347 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.13 IAPMO Publications.

International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, 4755 E. Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA 91761.

UPC, Uniform Plumbing Code,2012 2015 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates referenced IAPMO publication.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.


348 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


349 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.16 SFPE Publications.

Society of Fire Protection Engineers SFPE , 9711 Washingtonian Blvd., Suite 380, Gaithersburg, MD 20878. www.sfpe.org

SFPE Code Official's Guide to Performance-Based Design Review, 2004.

SFPE Engineering Guide—Evaluation of the Computer Fire Model DETACT-QS, 2002.

SFPE Engineering Guide to Design Human Behavior in Fire SFPE Engineering Guide to Design Performance-Based Fire ProtectionAnalysis and Design of Buildings , 2003 .

SFPE Engineering Guide to Human Behavior in Fire , 2003.

SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection, 2007.

SFPE Engineering Standard on Calculating Fire Exposures to Structures ,

SFPE Evaluation of Enclosure Temperature Empirical Models, Hunt, S., Cutonilli, J. and Hurley, M., 2010.

SFPE Guidelines for Peer Review in the Fire Protection Design Process, 2009.

SFPE Guidelines for Substantiating a Fire Model for a Given Application, 2011.

SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering,fourth fifth edition, 2008 2015 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

All revision are editorial in nature a) indicate proper name of organization as SFPE, b) Fire Exposure Standard waspreviously referenced in section 5.5.3.3.3.1, c) indicate correct name of human behavior guide and d) include correct editionof the SFPE handbook.

SFPE S.01 added to Ch. 2 via separate second revision.

ResponseMessage:



Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


350 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


351 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.20 UL Publications.


UL 10B, Standard for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2008, revised 2015.

UL 10C, Standard for Positive Pressure Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2015.

UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials,2003 2011 , revised 2014 2015 .

UL 300, Standard for Fire Testing of Fire Extinguishing Systems for Protection of Commercial Cooking Equipment , 2005, revised2014.

UL 300A, Extinguishing System Units for Residential Range Top Cooking Surfaces , 2006.

UL 580, Standard for Tests for Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies, 2006, revised 2013.

UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2008, revised 2013.

UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction, 2009 1996 , revised 2013 2012 .

UL 1256, Standard for Fire Test of Roof Deck Constructions, 2002, revised 2013.

UL 1479, Standard for Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Firestops,2003, revised 2012 2015 .

UL 1588, Outline of Investigation for Roof and Gutter De-Icing Cable Units, 2002.

UL 1703, Standard for Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules and Panels, 2016 .

UL 1715, Standard for Fire Test of Interior Finish Material, 1997, revised 2013.

UL 1897, Standard for Uplift Tests for Roof Covering Systems, 2004, revised 2012 2015 .

UL 2079, Standard for Tests for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems, 2004, revised 2014.

UL 2196, Tests ofFire Resistive Cables , 2001, revised 2006.

UL 2424, Outline of Investigation for Cable Marked Limited Combustible, 2006.

UL 2703, Standard for Safety for Mounting Systems, Mounting Devices, Clamping/Retention Devices, and Ground Lugs for Usewith Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules and Panels , 2015.

UL, Fire Resistance Directory, 2014.

UL, Subject 1724, Outline of Investigation for Fire Tests for Electrical Circuit Protective Systems , 2006.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates referenced UL publications.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


352 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


353 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.22 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Publishing Office, 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20402 20401-0001 .

Title 16 Code of Federal Regulations, Title Part 1630, Standard for the Surface Flammability of Carpets and Rugs, 1993.

Title 28 Code of Federal Regulations, Title Part 36, Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, 1994.

Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, Title Part 1910.146, Permit-Required Confined Spaces, 1998 2011 .

Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, Title Part 1910.1000, Storage and Handling of Petroleum Gases, 2001.

Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Title Part 260 to 265 and 266 to 299, Hazardous Waste Management System-General.

Title 47 Code of Federal Regulations, Title Telecomunications Telecommunications .

Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Title Part 173, Shippers-General Requirements for Shipments and Packages, 2005.

Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Title Part 37 , Transportation.

EPA, EPA-402-R-93-021.

FEMA Hurricane Katrina Recovery Advisory, Design and Construction in Coastal A Zones, 2005.

FEMA P-320 , Taking Shelter from the Storm: Building a Safe Room for Your Home or Small Business .

FEMA P-361, Design and Construction Guidance for Community Safe Rooms .

FEMA Technical Bulletin 1-93 08 , Openings in Foundation Walls for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas, and Walls ofEnclosures, 1993 2008 .

FEMA Technical Bulletin 2-93, Flood Resistant Materials Requirements for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas, 1993.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 3-93, Nonresidential Floodproofing — Requirements and Certification for Buildings Located in SpecialFlood Hazard Areas, 1993.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 4-93 10 , Elevator Installation for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas ,1993 2010 .

FEMA Technical Bulletin 5-93, Free-of-Obstruction Requirements for Buildings Located in Coastal High Hazard Areas, 1993.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 7-93, Wet Floodproofing Requirements for Structures Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas, 1993.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 8-96, Corrosion Protection for Metal Connectors in Coastal Areas, 1996.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 9-99, Design and Construction Guidance for Breakaway Walls Below Elevated Coastal Buildings, 1999.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 10-01, Ensuring that Structures Built on Fill in or Near Special Flood Hazard Areas Are Reasonably Safefrom Flooding, 2001.

FEMA 348, Protecting Building Utilities from Flood Damage: Principles and Practices for the Design and Construction of FloodResistant Building Utility Systems , 1999.

FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, 2000.

NIST, Feasibility of Fire Evacuation by Elevators at FAA Control Towers, 1994.

Technical Manual (TM) 5-1300/Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) P-397/Air Force Manual (AFM) 88-22, “Structuresto Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions,” November 28, 1992.

U.S. Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40, “Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States for Durations from 30 Minutes to 24Hours and Return Periods from 1 to 100 Years,” Weather Bureau, Dept. of Commerce, 1961.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates U.S. Government publication references.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


354 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


355 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391


G.1.2.23 Other Publications.

Ellingwood, B., “Load Combination Requirements for Fire Resistant Structural Design, Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 15, 1,2005, pp. 43–61.

Gann et al., Fire and Materials, 18:193, 1994.

Groner, N. E., and B. M. Levin, “Human Factor Considerations in the Potential for Using Elevators in Building Emergency EvacuationPlans,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST-GCR-92-615, 1992.

Groner, N. E., and B. M. Levin, “Human Behavior Aspects of Staging Areas for Fire Safety in GSA Buildings,” National Institute ofStandards and Technology, NIST-GCR-92-606, 1992.

Groner, N. E., and B. M. Levin, “Human Factor Considerations for the Potential Use of Elevators for Fire Evacuation of FAA AirTraffic Control Towers,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST-GCR-94-656, 1994.

Hirschler, M. M. et al., “ Carbon Monoxide and Human Lethality:” Fire and Non-Fire Studies,” Elsevier, 1993.

Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice for Design,28th 29th ed., American Conference of Government IndustrialHygienists, 2013 2016 .

Kaplan et al., Journal of Fire Science, 2:286–305, 1984.

Klote J.H. and J.A. Milke, Principles of Smoke Management Systems , 2002 .

National Roofing Contractors’ Association (NRCA), “Roofing Manual: Membrane Roof Systems,” 2015.

Templer, J. A., The Staircase: Studies of Hazards, Falls, and Safer Design, MIT Press Publications, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

SEAOC, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary (SEAOC Blue Book) (Appendix G), 1999.

Tu, K.-M. and S. Davis, Flame Spread of Carpet Systems Involved in Room Fires, Center for Fire Research, National Bureau ofStandards, 1976.

Waksman, David D. and J. Ferguson, John, “Fire Tests of Building Interior Covering Systems,” Fire Technology, Institute for AppliedTechnology, National Bureau of Standards, August 1974.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates referenced publication.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew



356 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


357 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 4030-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. G.2 ]

G.2 Informational References.

The following documents or portions thereof are listed here as informational resources only. They are not a part of the requirementsof this document.

UL, Subject 1724, Outline of Investigation for Fire Tests for Electrical Circuit Protective Systems, 2006.

UL 2196, Tests of Fire Resistive Cables, 2001, revised 2012.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates informational reference.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.


Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan


358 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


359 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Second Revision No. 4031-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. G.3 ]

G.3 References for Extracts in Informational Sections.

NFPA 1, Fire Code, 2015 2018 edition.

NFPA 55, Compressed Gases and Cryogenic Fluids Code, 2013 2016 edition.

NFPA 88A, Standard for Parking Structures, 2015 edition.

NFPA 90A , Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning and Ventilating Systems , 2015 edition.

NFPA 99 , Health Care Facilities Code , 2018 edition.

NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®, 2015 2018 edition.

NFPA 221, Standard for High Challenge Fire Walls, Fire Walls, and Fire Barrier Walls, 2015 2018 edition.

NFPA 400, Hazardous Materials Code, 2013 2016 edition.

NFPA 914, Code for Fire Protection of Historic Structures, 2010 2015 edition.

NFPA 921, Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, 2014 2017 edition.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updates references.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


28 Eligible Voters

6 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Blum, Andrew


Gerdes, Ralph D.

Jacoby, David J.


Saba, Patrick S.

Affirmative All


Cheng, Amy Y.



360 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

Finnegan, Daniel P.

Frable, David W.


Groner, Norman E.

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jelenewicz, Chris

Klein, David P.

Laramee, Scott T.

Lathrop, James K.

Lovell, Vickie J.

McKeon, Thomas W.

Murga, Ricardo

Pauls, Jake


Reiswig, Rodger

Roberts, Jon G.

Tyree, David P.

Wydeveld, Steven F.


361 of 361 10/31/2016 12:31 PM

of 391

national fire protection association report · federal emergency management agency (fema), taking...

Documents