SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

Distr.: General25 January 2018Original: English

5th Latin America and the Caribbean regional meeting on the Strategic Approachto International Chemicals ManagementPanama City, Panama, 29-31 January 2018

Report of the 5th Latin America and the Caribbean regional meeting on the Strategic Approach

1. Opening of the meeting1. The fifth Latin America and Caribbean regional meeting on the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) was opened by Mr. Jacob Duer at 9.30 a.m. on Monday 29 January 2018 at Country Inn & Suites® by Radisson, Amador Ave. & Pelicano Ave., Panama City 8001 Panama.

2. Ms. Leticia Carvalho made some introductory remarks as the ICCM5 Bureau representative for the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region for the fifth session of the International Conference on Chemicals Management (ICCM5), and as co-chair of the intersessional process for the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020. She thanked the host government of Panama, donors and the SAICM secretariat for the important opportunity to review activities and plan for the intersessional process. The third Open-ended Working Group (OEWG3) takes place in early 2019, so the regional meeting represents an important moment to meet. She also thanked the simultaneous interpreters. She finished by reminding participants of the value of this opportunity to meet in advance of the intersessional process, and to develop regional perspectives, priorities and plans.

3. Opening remarks were also provided by Ms. Gertrud Sahler, the President of ICCM5, who thanked the host government of Panama and the SAICM secretariat for organising the meeting. Ms. Sahler noted that she was pleased to attend, and the importance of the intersessional process. The regions now have the opportunity to be well-prepared for the process, with the co-chairs’ paper providing solid support to develop positions. She referenced the Lancet Commission on pollution and health as evidence of the importance of sound management of chemicals and waste, with pollution causing an estimated 9 million deaths per year, compared with half a million from malaria. However, funding given to combat Aids, Malaria and Tuberculosis is many millions of United States dollars, versus minimal resources to combat pollution: this is a dramatic disproportion. Having spoken to a representative of the German Ministry of Economic Development, all bilateral development is provided on the basis of country priorities; if this is to be on chemicals and waste, this needs to be prioritised at senior levels of government.

4. Reducing environmental pollution is a real challenge for the 2030 Agenda. Therefore, the need for the Strategic Approach is self-evident, though some changes are needed. The differences between

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

developing and developed countries are growing, and the world will struggle to meet the 2020 goal. Ms. Sahler also referenced the SAICM evaluation, noting the need to prioritise chemicals and waste at the national level. The multistakeholder aspect of SAICM is so important, with civil society supporting national implementation and the opportunity for industry to take responsibility.

5. The host government welcomed participants on behalf of Mr. Miguel Mayo, Minister of Health. She referenced the SAICM 2020 Goal, and how important this is for human health and environment. Thus, the meeting served as a significant opportunity to reformulate the objectives of SAICM beyond 2020, within the 2030 Agenda. Even if countries continue to develop, there is ultimately always a need to increase capacities at the local level, with industry also playing a vital role. Unfortunately, the impacts on human health and environment are worsening, and so the links between the two need to be made even stronger as we moved forward.

2. Organizational matters(a) Adoption of the agenda

6. The regional focal point (serving ad interim), Ms. Florencia Grimalt, was not able to attend the meeting. As the regional representative to the ICCM5 Bureau, Ms. Carvalho was proposed and accepted as chair of the meeting.

7. As part of the working of the meeting, a decision was to be made on who would be nominated officially as regional focal point until ICCM5 in 2020. The chair noted that often there is a balance of focal points between the “Latin America” countries, and the “Caribbean” countries; one being reserved for the Bureau representative, one for the regional focal point. She also reminded participants of the role of the regional focal point: to facilitate information exchange, chair regional meetings, and work with the Bureau. In advance of the intersessional meeting in Stockholm, March 2018, there is also a responsibility to decide who will be supported to represent the region.

8. A colleague from Argentina thanked Ms. Grimalt for her good work for the region and passed on the message that she was willing to continue the duties of regional focal point, should it be accepted.

9. Other countries showed their support for the continuation of the regional focal point. Nonetheless, a process to discuss the nomination informally during the three days was accepted by the Chair. In the end, it was agreed that the interim regional focal point would continue until OEWG3, with the expectation that a formal, long-term decision could be made.

10. Participants adopted the agenda, as set out in document SAICM/RM/LAC.5/1.

11. A representative of RAPAM commented that two days of presentations, with only one day of working group discussions may be too short, and encouraged bringing forward the group discussions. The chair confirmed that this issue is noted from the regional meeting in Asia-Pacific from the week before, and group discussions would take place from day two.

12. The Chair also clarified that the intersessional meetings are open to all stakeholders, but the financial resources available are limited, and allocations are made on the basis of the ICCM4 resolution. Thus, the regional meetings are vital opportunities to coordinate regional stances.

13. A representative from the Dominican Republic commented on the delays in sending out invitations to the intersessional meeting in March 2018. Noting that it was late in the process now, she requested that this be improved for next time.

14. The SAICM secretariat clarified that the formal invitations for the intersessional meeting were issued in December 2017, with provisional ‘save the date’ letters sent out previously. Unfortunately,

2

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

the secretariat could not send formal invitations before December 2017 as the final confirmation of the host was not available.

(b) Objectives and expected outcome of the regional meeting and regional representation in Strategic Approach related efforts.

15. The SAICM secretariat made a presentation on the objectives and expected outcomes of the regional meeting. Mr. Duer noted the value of Intergovernmental Network on Chemicals and Waste for Latin America and the Caribbean points (see agenda item 4), as a model for the other regions, which are considering replicating this. He thanked Florencia for her efforts as regional focal point, and reminded participants of the importance of the regional meetings in preparing for future work. He also stressed that national focal points had responsibilities, and outlined these in his presentation.

16. The ICCM5 President again underlined the importance of regional meetings to prepare for the intersessional process and OEWG3. She hoped that the three days could provide for fruitful discussions and the development of a clear regional plan.

17. A couple of participants noted the difficulties for national focal points, as coordination can be difficult. The Basel Convention provides for more than one focal point, and this may be of benefit under SAICM.

18. The representative from Peru noted difficulties in accessing the SAICM reporting platform (in terms of receiving the codes and effective functioning), and lamented the impression that there are lower reporting rates, in spite of great calls for increases since the last reporting round.

19. The representative from the Dominican Republic informed the meeting that the country has two focal points; one in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and one in the Ministry of Environment and Natural resources, for technical matters. While there is some miscommunication, this has proven to be a successful approach. She also noted the development of the SAICM National Profile with funds from UN Environment and with the support of the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR). It was considerable work but was fruitful, and the country is now on target against the plan in the profile.

20. The SAICM secretariat informed participants that a number of countries have nominated two focal points (an official one and a technical one), and invited countries to nominate in this manner, if they see fit. He also encouraged the UN Environment regional office to take note of the request for more communication.

21. The Chair reminded participants to keep all of the issues regarding focal points and communication in mind for the breakout groups.

(c) Attendance

22. The meeting was attended by representatives of the following countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Germany, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, and Uruguay.

23. Representatives of the following intergovernmental organizations and regional organizations also attended: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Environment Latin America and the Caribbean Office, United Nations Environment Ozone Secretariat, United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR).

3

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

24. The meeting was also attended by representatives of the following organizations: Abacus, Asociatión National de la Industria Química, CASA CEM – Vias Verdes A.C., Croplife Latin International, Croplife Latin America, Healthcare Without Harm, Latin American Nanotechnology and Society Network, RAPAM/CAATA, Red de Acción en Plaguicidas y Alternativas de América Latina, and the Toxisphera Environmental Health Asssociation.

2. Implementation of the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management

25. Paragraph 26 of the Strategic Approach’s Overarching Policy Strategy and resolution I/1 of the International Conference on Chemicals Management, on implementation arrangements, recognizes that regional meetings play an essential role in the implementation of the Strategic Approach by providing a forum for reviewing progress in regional implementation; providing guidance on implementation to all stakeholders at the regional level; and enabling technical and strategic discussions and information exchange.

26. Participants had before them document SAICM/RM/LAC.5/2, which set out the report of the fourth Latin America and Caribbean regional meeting on the Strategic Approach, held in Mexico City, Mexico, on 22 August 2013.

(a) Progress review on implementation of the SAICM Overall Orientation and Guidance within the region

27. Ms. Grimalt apologised for not being in Panama in-person, and proceeded to make a presentation via skype on regional implementation.

28. She noted that the LAC region is one of the largest regions, is a main centre for food production, and growth in production of chemicals in the region is forecasted to increase by 33 per cent. As such, the growth will mostly be in relation to agriculture. She also highlighted the impact of lead and the significant costs and impacts associated with it. She also commented on the need to strengthen regional reporting rates, in order to contribute to the development of the “global picture”. She finalised by urging participants to see this as “the moment for us to take action”.

29. RAPAM, in support of a role for civil society, expressed their willingness to work with the regional focal point in order to strengthen communication. He suggested developing a list or database of contacts, for the region and with subcategories, in order to enhance communication.

30. The representative of the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) commented that they are in the second year of a Quick Start Programme (QSP) project, which includes a virtual platform to share knowledge.

31. Mexico provided an update on their experience from a project on SAICM implementation, advising of 30 meetings of the intersectoral coordination in the last two years, showing the strength of the consultative nature of the Strategic Approach. These meetings facilitate discussions on the current situation in Mexico and what actions to take in order to understand the current situation.

(i) Panel discussion of country experiences including financial mechanism and QSP experience

32. Several participants presented on their activities supported by relevant financial mechanisms and the Quick Start Programme.

33. Argentina presented on their experience of a project with United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), focusing on hazardous materials and chemical products. The current challenges include: a lack of capacities, international regulations which are not regulated at national level, and

4

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

lack of updates on guidelines and norms. Furthermore, as a federal government, there can be difficulties in communicating with self-sufficient regions. The four main activities of the project are: a plan to establish a chemicals directorate; development of guidelines to work on a new agreement (e.g. a Convention), to identify clear roles and responsibilities; the establishment of an interministerial round-table to coordinate work; and development of priorities and an action plan.

34. The Dominican Republic has applied to UN Environment’s Special Programme. This was to further work undertaken by a previous Quick Start Programme (QSP) project to develop a national profile, with the support of UNITAR. Through the past project, the government was able to coordinate meetings throughout the project and bring together all sectors, and now there is a coordination mechanism that is fairly strong. As the Ministry of the Environment has only existed for 18 years, many of the different responsibilities for chemicals and waste were shared among different agencies. Previous activities have helped to develop a matrix of responsibilities: however, this needs regular follow-up and financial support to keep it going. The QSP was able to bring together parties and ensured that relevant actors are including the activities from their plan in their annual budgets, which is crucial. An annual meeting takes place to come together and review progress and commitments against the plan. This follow-up has been an example of progressive work on an action plan. The representative also spoke of the importance of considering Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) and labelling in the country, online exchange of information, and emergency response to chemical accidents. In response to the presentation, the representative of PAHO noted that the International Health Regulations are important for chemical emergencies, training for preparedness, preparation and response. The IHRs are mandatory, so this can also support improvement of capacities.

35. Costa Rica has undertaken a project on Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs), with the objective to manage them across their whole life cycle. One of the five objectives was to identify HHPs in the coffee and pineapple industries. There have been clear studies suggesting no reduction in yield by replacing HHPs; in fact, an increase in profits given that non-HHPs are cheaper. As a consequence of this work, farmers, families and workers will benefit. The project found that 79 per cent of imported pesticides between 1980 and 2012 were HHPs, and these levels are increasing.

36. The representative of Mexico reiterated the importance he sees in raising awareness among different actors, referencing a month-long workshop in Sweden (approximately six years ago) on how the country manages pesticides and reduces consumption, without reducing output. He also referenced a workshop on alternatives for Endosulfan, held four years ago in Mexico. While it is possible to replace Endosulfan, few are looking to undertake this change, and it is difficult to achieve significant industry involvement. Noting that there are alternatives to HHPs, he encouraged more work in getting these replaced, with a need for engagement from industry, and our common interest in human health and the environment. A representative from Colombia suggested that international exchange networks would be useful for encouraging ecological alternatives.

37. The representative of RAPAL agreed with the concerns regarding use of pesticides in the region, and saw this as confirming the important role of civil society. It is often the most difficult to engage with governments, as there are often changes and discontinuity in teams. RAPAL seeks to continue its work on pesticides, working with government, particular in substitution (not just reduction) in most agricultural activities, including intensive agriculture.

38. The representative of Peru noted that pesticides are often considered as the oldest regulated chemicals. Thus, there are frameworks available for their management, and we can use these to develop risk assessments. However, it is vital these take into account the specific populations, not just focusing on the chemical formulations.

5

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

39. The participant from Toxisphera noted that Brazil has a national chemical safety commission, with civil society allowed to participate. This is a good step to help start dialogue, and could be replicated across the region.

40. The representative from Croplife encouraged raising awareness of HHPs, and would like to discuss options for doing so with Costa Rica, particularly for future work on bananas. Also, the organization is willing to support Argentina in its project and activities. Croplife undertakes capacity building on management of pesticides, with its members committed to protection of human health and the environment, and provides technology to uphold agricultural productivity, including through the agricultural code of conduct. He reiterated the offer to support strengthening capacities to manage agrochemicals across LAC, notably in the Caribbean, where historically there has been less presence from Croplife. The organization has trained over a high number on the management and use of agrochemicals, and collected 16,000 tons of empty plastic pesticides’ containers. Croplife international has led activities on the management of agrochemicals, but also seeks more from FAO, SAICM and other stakeholders to deal with issue of HHPs. Croplife invites and is enthusiastically waiting for collaboration with stakeholders to help address issues.

41. The participant from Panama noted that Croplife has not often come forward with such support, and thus welcomed it. She called on Croplife to help with training and education, as they may have more resources, and referenced a need to consider the supply chain for pesticides, so that the risks can be managed as much as possible. Furthermore, she noted that the Ministries of Health and Agricultural Development have established an agronomic prescription list, with registration of who is selling and buying pesticides. This, in itself, has created a training process to understand some of the issues around pesticides. For pesticides, those workers looking to apply pesticides, must have a relevant permit. In addition, the country has created an internal classification registry for HHPs, though this cannot cover all pesticides. With regards to health, a training programme has been developed for physicians in care centres, including how to address an intoxication issue, and to record the instances. Panama is now trying to develop a registry for some chronic diseases, in order to understand why some issues are happening.

42. The QSP project in Jamaica is currently in the closing stages. Throughout the project, there has been a focus on sustainability of skills and capacities beyond the project lifetime, so has concentrated on foundational capacities. The project has also supported the development of a web-based application for risk management on chemicals, and has offered to share this in the region. During the project, it was felt that NGO participation was difficult to achieve, so would be interested in hearing of examples of how this was done in other countries. The representative noted that immediate pollution issues bring everyone together at a crisis point, but systematic processes are more difficult to establish.

43. PAHO presented a network on toxicology that has been developed, though commented that the network platform is not always used, as people are so used to using email. As a consequence, it is often just finalised products that are placed on the platform, rather than interim working documents. The network hosts two teleconferences per month to gauge progress, address problems and share information. PAHO has run several ‘Plagisalud’ (pesticides health) courses, and will be running them again in 2018. PAHO also ran regional workshops on the health sector role in the Minamata Convention.

44. In the ensuing discussion, the participant from Chile complimented the work done in the region. She also thanked PAHO for their support for regional participation, and urged more effective and broader information sharing, which sometimes can get lost. She also pushed for higher priority for chemicals and health at the WHO Executive Board. PAHO, reflecting on the comment, pointed out that resolution 69.4 (from 2017) from the World Health Assembly integrates SAICM into WHO work.

6

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

45. The presentation from the secretariat of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm (BRS) Conventions noted similarities across the conventions, with many target dates for action and achievements. This underscored how relevant the BRS Conventions can be to the Sustainable Development Goals and the indicators. As a general comment, the participant from Mexico thanked the BRS secretariat for their assistance and support, as this is vital.

46. The participant from Casa Cem - Vias Verdes related the experience in Mexico, where there is a problem with lead in traditional clay pottery. While one of their stakeholders had worked for 27 years in training artisanal potters, he had not been able to promote any reduction in lead. However, it would be a case of closing down four companies manufacturing the relevant products. This was presented as case of not just a need for capacity building, but also decisions made at the national level for the national interest.

47. The Chair acknowledged the great work going on in the region, while noting that much work is also still to be done, and urged participants to sharpen their requirements from the Intersessional Process and the messages they want to communicate.

(ii) Status of regional input to the SAICM Report on Progress, 2014-2016

48. The fourth session of the International Conference requested the secretariat to develop a third progress report, including achievements, strengths and weaknesses for the period 2014–2016 and an analysis of the 20 indicators of progress for consideration by the Open-ended Working Group at its third meeting (October 2018). ICCM4 also directed the Open-ended Working Group to consider the need for a report for the period 2017–2019 for consideration by ICCM5. As such, an online survey was developed, building on past surveys. Every SAICM focal point received a separate e-mail with a personalized link to participate in the survey on progress.

49. The SAICM secretariat presented current numbers from the reporting, highlighting that only four countries from the regional had provided reports. In order to gather as many reports as possible, the tool will remain open until 31 March 2018. It is important to identify progress in the region and the results of this survey will be used as a basis to develop the progress report for 2014-2016, which will be considered by the Open-ended Working Group at its third meeting (OEWG3).

50. Several countries, including the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Trinidad and Tobago, and Colombia, requested more precise information on their login details and the current status of reporting, in order to deliver a complete report.

51. The participant from Colombia reiterated that one of the deficiencies of the focal point process is that only one contact receives the request. Perhaps alternative or additional contacts should be added to such mailing lists, to encourage greater commitment and coordination at the national level.

52. In addition, the SAICM secretariat circulated the list of focal points to check and update contact information, so that the details are accurate. The SAICM secretariat committed to circulating all the relevant information for reporting and accessing the platform.

(b) Session with the WHO “Road map to enhance health sector engagement in the strategic approach to international chemicals management towards the 2020 goal and beyond” and its implementation

53. The WHO has developed the Roadmap to enhance health sector engagement in the strategic approach to international chemicals management towards the 2020 goal and beyond in accordance with WHA Resolution 69.4 and approved by the Seventieth World Health Assembly in decision WHA70(23). The Roadmap is presented in document “Road map to enhance health sector engagement in the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management towards the 2020 goal and beyond” (SAICM/IP.2/INF.2).

7

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

54. The PAHO/ WHO led a discussion on health sector engagement on the sound management of chemicals and waste to 2020 and beyond. Participants were encouraged to discuss the participation of health sector in the Strategic Approach and also to consider how other sectors may learn from this approach. She noted that the health sector, and indeed all sectors, still needs training on chemical safety. She then called on the participants from ministries of health to make presentations.

55. The participant from Chile presented on implementation of the roadmap. The Ministry of Health is responsible for many of the elements on chemicals, with a chemical safety programme in the Ministry of Health; the principal regulator of chemicals in Chile. The roadmap is well-presented and helps prioritise some of the activities and responsibilities. They have found that it has not always been clear how and where the population were being exposed, but the roadmap has helped overcome this. They have also been able to work with communities to understand that they can be part of the solution and have a significant part to play.

56. For Jamaica, one of the major issues is disposal of chemicals in waste. The roadmap will help with outlining how to do this, including developing legislation. However, there are also issues of overlapping responsibilities and lack of resources to identify exposures in the countries. There is a system to monitor what is coming into the countries, though there are limits in properly identifying what exact chemicals are being brought in. There is also a problem of stockpiling at the point of entry if they are not let in, and this can cause unwanted exposure. Linked to this, they do not have final elimination facilities, so can only commit to stockpiling. The country is looking to develop a take-back scheme for chemicals. There is a notification process for chemicals exposures, with a recent example of lead exposure and subsequent investigation into what caused the exposure; a children’s painted toy. Unfortunately, this had to be sent off for external assessment, so took some time for the results. A QSP project has also supported a national chemicals emergencies response plan, undertaken with a variety of stakeholders, identifying clear roles and responsibilities. Activities are underway to assess mercury exposure in pregnant women, in collaboration with the University of the West Indies, and Trinidad and Tobago. Ultimately, the roadmap helps to guide the Ministry of Health in its responsibilities, and encouraging others to take their responsibilities

57. In Panama, the roadmap has helped to promote coordination of work across many other ministries. Within the workshops, they have worked to define priority areas per sector, and were brought together as national priority areas. These were also mapped against the SDGs to see what were then the agreed priorities. The plan is useful as a guide to establish programmes for improving national conditions.

58. For Uruguay, the roadmap has been an engine for participation for involvement of the Ministry of Health. National prioritisation needs to be done at Cabinet Level to make sure it is in the interest of all ministries, and the roadmap helps to resolve problems for the health sector and determine priorities.

59. The representative of HCWH added that her organization has lots of materials for use by hospitals. Their programme framework has 10 priorities, with one being chemical substances. HCWH works with networks of hospitals to replace mercury sustainably. She noted that there is always a continuous process of learning.

(c) Update on the Global Chemicals Outlook II: “Regional Dimension of Global Chemicals Outlook”

60. UN Environment presented the latest developments on the Global Chemicals Outlook (GCO) II, with participants invited to comment and discuss the next steps. An important element of the GCO is the regional contextualization process, that will complement the global nature of the Outlook.

61. UN Environment confirmed that there is a component in the GCO on nanotechnologies and manufactured nanomaterials, as part of a chapter on “Emerging policy issues and other issues with emerging evidence of risk”. Furthermore, he clarified that participation in the contextualization work would include both an in-person workshop, and online meetings.

8

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

62. If stakeholders wished to participate more directly in reviewing work, they are welcome to liaise with UN Environment, or their representatives on the board, which includes regional representatives (Ms. Leticia Carvalho and Ms. Florencia Grimalt), as well as several NGO, academic and industry organizations.

4. Presentation on the Framework of the Intergovernmental Network on Chemicals and Waste for Latin America and the Caribbean

(a) Presentation of the report on regional priorities on chemicals and waste

63. This agenda item was introduced via a presentation by the co-chair (Jamaica) of the Steering Committee of the Intergovernmental Network on Chemicals and Waste for Latin America and the Caribbean. A representative from UN Environment presented the report.

64. The representative of Peru felt that the network should not be considered a separate process to SAICM and is an opportunity to engage with the colleagues working on the conventions and the Strategic Approach. The survey for the network received responses from the nominated focal points, but there was coordination among eight agencies. The network’s webinars have also been useful in motivating broad stakeholders to support the work, in addition to the focal points.

65. From RAPAL’s point of view, building coordination and synergies are useful. The creation of the network at the ministerial level (via a declaration) has helped to establish priorities. However, he noted that civil society also needs an appropriate platform to contribute to and support regional plans. Additionally, he urged a commitment to providing access to information, especially for workers in the region and what they are exposed to. In response, the participant from Panama supported facilitating civil society inclusion. It was noted that ministries had initially put in funding to host meetings, but inclusion of sectors had not been an early priority. Some academics are already included but notes the desire to include more from civil society. UN Environment confirmed that it is definitely foreseen to include different NGO participants, with the inclusion of IPEN in process. They will therefore have a role on shaping the regional action plan.

66. The chair of the network committed to taking up the issue of civil society inclusion. She also noted that the issue of gender equality had taken on greater prominence, with many women involved in chemicals and waste. She also communicated that the national response to the network survey had been circulated within Jamaica, including NGOs, so it was a coordinated national response.

67. The participant from the Dominican Republic felt it is important to develop a regional policy on hazardous waste, with UN Environment offering a valuable role in this. Notably, it is difficult to manage mercury waste. In addition, she mentioned it may be prudent to include gender equality under the network, given its link to the 2030 Agenda, and encourages countries to improve their efforts on this matter.

68. Two participants sounded a word of caution on linking the work of the network to principle 10 of the Rio Declaration. This could be taken up by the Chair and UN Environment as the network continues.

69. The meeting Chair confirmed that there is a mandate for a working group on scope of action and planning. She also commented that the mechanism is useful, and it is interesting to understand how the network can support the intersessional process. It is true that the network is an environmental network, but the intention is to have this expanded to all stakeholders interested and involved in this work, in the manner of SAICM.

(b) Discussion on the priority needs in the region to achieve by 2020

70. Participants had the opportunity to discuss the priority needs in the region to achieve by 2020.

9

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

5. Engaging on the chemicals agenda

(a) Presentation by OECD on the elements making up a functional industrial chemical management system;

71. The OECD led a session on “Development of an industrial chemical management system, including experiences from the region”. Following the presentation, selected countries were invited to present their experiences in this area.

72. A presentation from Costa Rica showcased the experience of setting up such a system, starting in 2015. Since that time, 80,000 chemicals have been registered, though it is important to note that these need to be filtered and analyzed, especially to remove chemicals no longer in use. She noted that the greatest challenge for Costa Rica was to understand the true meaning of an industrial chemicals management plan, and then to get the right stakeholders involved. The country is trying to cover the life cycle of products, with commitment from industry; this is working given they see it as beneficial.

73. Colombia presented some of their challenges but noted that they had been successful in gaining participation from the Ministries of Labour and Trade.

74. In Chile, the Ministry of Environment leads the development of the industrial chemical management programme, but with involvement of the Ministry of Health. The system has been a significant challenge as there is no registry of industrial chemicals. A list has been developed of chemicals that were considered as a priority but does not cover all hazardous chemicals. Such a registry of all hazardous chemicals would need to be developed. Furthermore, it is difficult to establish exactly which chemicals are produced in the country. An additional challenge is to have knowledge systems that allow stakeholders to manage all the information that is being generated. It has been difficult to overcome transparency issues and access to information, even though they have obligations as a country.

75. The representative from Mexico thanked the OECD for their work on chemicals, circular economy, the GHS and Pollutant and Release Transfer Registers (PRTRs). He also asked the meeting if anyone has experience from the region of work on electronic waste under the “RoHS” directive1? Brazil is working on the RoHS directive, and a representative offered to share more information on this.

(b) Emerging Policy Issues

(i) Update from the IOMC on progress on emerging policy issues and other issues of concern

76. Participants will have before them the document Updates on the implementation of Emerging Policy Issues and other issues of concern (SAICM/RM/2018/4).

77. A representative of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) provided an overall update of the progress on emerging policy issues and other issues of concern. Following the update, participants were invited to contribute to the discussion.

78. The Chair added her appreciation of the ICCM5 Bureau-IOMC joint meeting in November 2017 in Rome, which facilitated greater information sharing. The IOMC Participating Organizations clearly do a lot of work but urged the organizations to do still more in these areas. It is important for all regions to make a call for participation of IOMC Participating Organizations and working with them.

79. OECD reiterated an offer for all stakeholders to participate in their webinars that are available to the public, for free.

80. A participant from RAPAL questioned what some of the concrete actions are on Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs), and what are the actions for replacement for ecological alternatives. The question was relayed to the FAO to seek information.

1 Restriction of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment

10

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

81. In responding to a question, a representative of UN Environment noted the IOMC’s significant role in the management of mercury, principally through the coordination mechanism of the IOMC mercury group.

(ii) Discussion on country experiences and impact of emerging policy issue efforts in the region

82. Representatives from the OECD and other country and organization representatives were invited to present their experiences and the impact of their work on emerging policy issues and other issues of concern, including presentations about highly hazardous pesticides and experiences from the region.

83. A presentation from Peru ran through some of the main EPI activities and findings from the country. In this, it has been noted that given there is no punishment for producing lead in paint, the production simply continues. Nonetheless, some of these companies are being brought together to reduce the lead levels in paint. Under possible OECD accession requirements, there would be a need to develop a comprehensive management of chemicals system.

84. A representative of Relans provided an overview of nanotechnology, having been working on research and development of this topic since the end of the 20th century. Their work shows an estimate of 190 businesses using nanotechnologies, and the university survey identified 138. They have tried to do follow-up along the value chain. This experience contrasts a little with the situation in Europe where there are some requirements for labelling of nanomaterials, for example in makeup products, though this is not widespread. He appealed to the OECD to encourage the inclusion of such information to be provided on products, which would be a good step.

85. A participant from Mexico presented on electronic waste, noting that even if not specifically within the Stockholm Convention, some chemicals in e-waste are relevant to it. There is a need to develop certain testing protocols for the destruction techniques that are approved under the Basel Convention, to see if they are appropriate for the country.

86. The presentation from RAPAL focused on EPIs. There is a need to work on loopholes that allow HHPs into countries (Mexico was cited as an example). Furthermore, RAPAL works significantly on progressive substitution.

87. The participant from Casa Cem - Vias Verdes noted that in Brazil there is a regulation on lead in paint but that the legal text had not established a competent authority, thus limiting the enforcement level. Consequently, it is being updated with a new decree.

88. In the Dominican Republic, the Government has worked with FAO on two projects on HHPs. They have identified the most highly hazardous pesticides, developed by the Ministry of Agriculture, with the Ministries of Environment and Health also heavily involved. They have also worked with customs officers on training of how to handle these substances. Another project to collect and dispose of obsolete pesticides has been underway, with 20 tons of DDT and HHPs being shipped out of the country, as they were unable to destroy it in-country. For mercury, there is some artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) with mercury used, and they have had to ban its use followed swiftly by regulations. The Ministry of Mining and Energy has developed the regulations to ban imports of mercury.

89. In Panama, the majority of paints in the country are imported. Given this, the Ministry of Health takes all imported paints and tests these on-site, and then provides a permit of acceptability. For HHPs, there are joint regulations between the Ministries of Agriculture and Health, and limits the use of certain pesticides. With reference to EDCs, a study has taken place to establish who is working on the topic. The findings revealed one university is gathering samples from placentas, with the idea to develop a report as a major outcome.

90. For lead in paint in Ecuador, the Ministry of Industry has been working on regulations on quality of paints, with a limit established at 600 parts per million for those not in direct contact with humans, and 100 parts per million for direct use by the public. This was difficult to laboratories are not available to assess these in the country. For HHPs, a regulation is in place to ban every pesticide under the Rotterdam Convention. For chemicals in products, this is complicated to regulate, as most

11

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

products are imported. However, they are working on health products to establish what chemicals are in these products, and are initiating a registry for companies involved across the whole life cycle of hazardous substances, with a slow increase of scope of control.

91. RAPAL noted that the use of chemicals has increased in many countries, and this links across EPIs and other topics, such as eco-agriculture, climate change, and biodiversity, and linked to food sovereignty.

(iii) Update on the Strategic Approach GEF projects

92. The secretariat provided an update on the project preparation of the Strategic Approach GEF project. The presentation was followed by a discussion where participants had the opportunity to reflect on the different elements of the Strategic Approach GEF project, including aspects of Knowledge Management.

93. Representatives from RAPAL, Argentina and PAHO all requested more information and sought the opportunity to be involved in the project.

94. The SAICM secretariat commented that workshops have taken place to ensure those most active in the project areas have been included. For lead in paint, it mostly focuses on those that do not have relevant legislation, having worked with the Executive Board of the Global Alliance to Eliminate Lead Paint to identify countries. The knowledge management component is done at a global level, with all stakeholders. He added that the health sector has been integrated across both projects, working closely with WHO.

6. Environment Sector Perspectives on the future and identification regional priorities towards and beyond 202095. Participants had the opportunity to reflect on developments from an environment sector perspective that could present new challenges and opportunities for the sound management of chemicals and waste in moving forward.

96. A representative of UN Environment presented a thought-starter presentation, including an update of relevant mandates from the third session of the UN Environment Assembly, and other concepts and initiatives that link to the sound management of chemicals and waste from an environment sector perspective.

97. Some participants noted a need to work on both longer-standing issues and new, emerging issues.

98. The participant from Casa Cem - Vias Verdes remarked that most of the lead work is focused on lead in paint and lead-acid batteries. However, an emerging issue is lead pollution, from old technology television sets.

99. In the Dominican Republic, there is difficulty in working on heavy metals, as no companies in the country are able to recycle them (e.g. from lead-acid batteries) so have previously had to export. However, this has now been banned, and they are waiting for a relevant company to come forward with the capabilities to recycle.

100. The participant from Argentina made a request for the regional network and the SAICM secretariat to help develop a roadmap to help prioritise activities, as there are so many to work on under chemicals and waste.

101. The representative of ICCA noted that SAICM is a great forum to find those mechanisms to help achieve the goals up to and beyond 2020, and supports doing this through legislation and training.

102. From Croplife there was agreement on the need to work on HHPs, but cautioned that the topic needs to be handled carefully. There is a necessity to review existing methodologies in assessing risks. For a full discussion on these, all relevant stakeholders need to be available, particularly FAO.

103. The representative from RAPAL commented that even if the financing is not always available for all issues, there is often political will. However, all the political statements explicitly state the need for other sectors and stakeholders to be involved. Thus, a key is to have experts available for all discussions, including FAO and the ILO.

12

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

104. The SAICM secretariat noted that there will be interest in including the circular economy for the beyond 2020 framework, especially with impetus from European Union Member States. Furthermore, a message will be passed to IOMC organisation to make a call for greater participation.

7. SAICM and the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020105. The fourth session of the International Conference, through resolution IV/4, initiated an intersessional process to prepare recommendations regarding the Strategic Approach and the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020. The second meeting of the intersessional process will take place from 13-15 March 2018 in Stockholm, Sweden.

106. The overall mandate for considering the Strategic Approach and the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020 is set out in resolution IV/4 of the International Conference on Chemicals management. The task of the intersessional process is to provide recommendations to the Conference at its fifth session to enable the Conference to take an informed decision on future arrangements for the Strategic Approach and the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020.

107. Participants were expected to prepare for this agenda item by reviewing the materials available for the second meeting of the intersessional process, available at the following link: www.saicm.org/Beyond2020/IntersessionalProcess/SecondIntersessionalmeeting/tabid/6193/language/en-US/Default.aspx

108. Furthermore, stakeholder input to the intersessional process is available in document SAICM/IP.2/INF.3.

109. Discussions under this agenda item would support the region to consider the regional priorities in the beyond 2020 context to prepare for the second intersessional meeting.

(a) Overview of the intersessional process

110. The secretariat provided an update on the intersessional process, in particular the preparations for the second intersessional meeting.

111. Furthermore, the Co-Chairs of the intersessional process have developed document; the ‘Co-Chairs’ Overview Paper’ (SAICM/IP.2/5), to support preparations for the second intersessional meeting. One of the co-chairs of the IP presented the document.

112. The participant from Argentina made several comments, including the need for an ambitious vision, with the sound management of chemicals and waste as the starting point. Activities must be clearly defined, with an established means of implementation and financing.

113. The Chair remarked that it is true that means of implementation is regularly referenced and this can certainly be included in the recommendations from the intersessional process. The secretariat paper displays other means of implementation and models of frameworks.

114. The representative from Peru made a call, supported by others, for not overlooking national responsibilities to contribute technical aspects to international policy discussions, and find ways to incorporate national requirements into national budgeting. Even when a new issue arises, there are still old issues to solve and these can be focused on at national level. There is a need for prioritisation of chemicals and waste issues, as this dictates funding, and perhaps the regional office of UN Environment is in a position to help with this in communications with the relevant ministries.

(b) Regional input to the independent evaluation for 2006-2015115. The fourth session of the International Conference, through resolution IV/4, mandated the independent evaluation of the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management called for by the International Conference on Chemicals Management in its resolution IV/4. The aim of the evaluation is to provide information to enable the intersessional process to develop recommendations and to enable the International Conference at its fifth session to take an informed decision on future arrangements for the Strategic Approach and the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020.

116. Participants had available to them document Results of the focus group discussions held with National Focal Points (NFPs) from Africa, LAC, CEE and AP regions in Brasilia, February 2017 (SAICM/RM/LAC.5/3). The document provides the results of the focus group discussions held with National Focal Points (NFPs) from Asia-Pacific, Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean and Central and Eastern Europe in Brasilia, February 2017.

13

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

117. The independent evaluator presented the draft results of the evaluation, focusing on the region. The evaluator identified some key results, including national focal points and regional focal points lacking capacity to undertake all of the necessary roles – a key question is how to improve this situation. He also noted that strong partnerships with civil society can help the engagement with marginalised and vulnerable groups.

118. In responding to the presentation, PAHO noted that the health sector roadmap is a source of support to the SAICM process, even if WHO is no longer contributing directly to the SAICM secretariat.

119. The participant from ABACUS noted two significant elements: the importance of civil society in supporting SAICM, and financial input of industry to the process. The multi-stakeholder nature is thus a vital element in the implementation of SAICM.

120. The representative from BCRC Uruguay talked of synergies between SAICM and the BRS Conventions, and that the Basel and Stockholm regional centres are a good tool for this, and can assist with implementation.

121. In discussions, it was noted that the process for identifying lead agencies for the EPIs can be time consuming, and there is also often a capacity issue with agencies also needing funding to work on an issue. This could lead to an opportunity to reframe the role of the IOMC Participating Organizations on the EPIs.

(c) Dialogue on regional perspectives122. Participants were asked to be prepared to discuss the questions set out in the scenario note for the intersessional process (SAICM/IP.2/3).

(i) Vision, policy principles, objectives and milestones

123. To support this discussion, participants had the following documents available the IOMC plans for future actions to implement the goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda (SAICM/IP.2/7) and a proposal on objectives in support of the 2030 Agenda and related milestones (SAICM/IP.2/8).

124. Participants worked in small discussion groups to reflect on the overall vision, policy principles, objectives and milestones.

125. To complement the working group discussions, the representative from UNITAR introduced elements of a workshop on “The Aichi Biodiversity Targets: Are approaches and lessons from the biodiversity cluster relevant for the management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020?”, from January 2018, taking place in Berlin, Germany. The outcomes of the workshop are available on the UNITAR website2, with the outline of the relevant goals and targets that were presented as a common understanding from the workshop.

126. The working groups reported back to the plenary session, with the Chair being given a mandate to consolidate the three reports into a final regional document. It would not to be seen as a negotiated text, but will be put together as an information document for other regions and the intersessional meeting in March 2018.

(ii) Implementation arrangements and governance

127. Participants had a number of papers available to them to support discussions on implementation arrangements and governance, including: Gender and the sound management of chemicals and waste (SAICM/IP.2/6); Financing the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020 (SAICM/IP.2/9), and Review of existing governance models of potential relevance to the sound management of chemicals and waste, including science-policy interfaces (SAICM/IP.2/10).

128. Participants were invited to discuss and reflect on how to identify key stakeholders in moving forward and the related implementation and governance arrangements to confront issues in moving forward.

(iii) Communication and engagement, securing high-level political commitment and visibility

129. It has been highlighted that political commitment is an essential element of the process to ensure on-going and enhanced awareness and support, at the highest levels, to achieve the future vision beyond 2020. It should promote policy coherence at all levels and be linked to the vision and policy principles.

2 http://unitar.org/cwm/portfolio-projects/international-policy-development

14

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

130. Participants were invited to discuss key messages for beyond 2020 and to consider strategies and approaches for enhancing communication and engagement in moving forward.

(d) Updates from the co-chairs on the second meeting of the intersessional process131. The intersessional process is co-chaired by Ms. Leticia Reis de Carvalho (Brazil) and Mr. David Morin (Canada).

132. The Co-Chairs have developed document; the ‘Co-Chairs’ Overview Paper’ (SAICM/IP.2/5), to support preparations for the second intersessional meeting. The paper includes the elements brought forward at the first meeting of the intersessional process.

133. One of the co-chairs presented her expectations for the second meeting.

(e) Nomination of regional representatives at the second intersessional meeting

134. A representative of the secretariat outlined the process for nomination of regional representatives at the second intersessional meeting to be held 13-15 March 2018 in Stockholm, Sweden.

135. The registration process for funded participants for the second intersessional meeting closed on 31 January 2018. As the process depended on nomination of the regional focal point, a discussion ensued on the matter. It was agreed that informal communications, which had been the cause of some miscommunications around the decision to nominate the regional focal point ad interim, would be shared more widely and formally in the future.

136. Furthermore, there were discussions on the need for participants at the intersessional meeting to have a balance of regions, genders and sectors, the need to speak English, and to have communication skills. Some felt that there was a need to preference representatives who were not present at the first intersessional meeting.

137. The representative from Chile invited the SAICM and BRS secretariats to send a letter to all Missions in Geneva to enquire who is representing the LAC region in Geneva.

8. Moving forward: review of regional outreach, coordination and sub regional initiatives138. By its resolution II/2, the Conference encouraged Regional Focal Points to continue to play a facilitative role within the regions and requested them to report to the Conference on the outcomes of regional meetings and other regional activities during the intersessional period.

139. Participants were invited to discuss the Steering Committee of the Intergovernmental Network on Chemicals and Waste for Latin America and the Caribbean and future approaches for regional outreach and coordination to facilitate Strategic Approach implantation in the region.

140. The participant from RAPAL noted the evaluator’s comments that it is important to have improved collaboration with the IOMC Participating Organizations, notably FAO and ILO. It is impossible to discuss the life cycle of chemicals without talking with ILO and FAO.

9. Preparations for the third meeting of the Open-ended Working Group141. At its fourth session, the Conference confirmed the third Open-ended Working Group, in accordance with resolution II/6, to prepare for the fifth session of the Conference in 2020 and requested the secretariat to organize the third meeting of the Open-ended Working Group.

142. Participants had before them document SAICM/IP.2/INF/1, the timetable for the intersessional process highlighting information of the confirmed and provisional dates for upcoming Strategic Approach meetings. The third meeting of the Open-ended Working Group is tentatively scheduled for February 2019.

143. The secretariat provided a brief update on the preparations for the third meeting of the Open-ended Working Group. The secretariat invited all stakeholders in a position to do so to make financial contributions early in support of this meeting. The secretariat invited any interested offers to host the third meeting of the Open-ended Working Group.

10. Other matters144. Ms. Sahler gave some reflections, noting it is clearly a committed region, with strong efforts in implementing SAICM. These efforts underline the value of SAICM in the region. She took heed of the discussions of the need for financial resources, and the value of the QSP. It is held as the best

15

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

example of how to achieve broad success with tight budgets; she vowed to take this message to the EU-JUSSCANNZ meeting in February 2018, in Paris, France. Regarding the intersessional process, it offers the opportunity for all stakeholders to contribute to the beyond-2020 process and the future strategy. She also thanked Ms. Carvalho for excellently chairing the meeting, the participants, the secretariat for their support, and the interpreters.

145. The representative from RAPAL, on behalf of civil society groups, showcased the many networks, and these are willing to work together on regional outreach and enhance regional communication tools, including videoconferencing.

11. Closure of the meeting146. Participants were asked to evaluate the meeting and provide input to the secretariat via a survey.

147. Closing remarks were delivered by the Chair and she urged the region to continue its positive support for global efforts in pursuit of the SAICM 2020 goal and in developing the policy framework beyond 2020.

148. The meeting closed 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday 31 January 2018.

16

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

ANNEX 1

Fifth SAICM Latin America and the Caribbean Regional MeetingPanama City, Panama. 29-31 January 2018

Summary perspectives on SAICM and the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020

IntroductionThis document provides an overview of the Latin American and Caribbean views on the Strategic Approach and the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020. It is developed based on the discussion groups that took place at the regional meeting held in Panama City, Panama from 29-31 January 2018.

(I)VisionIn looking for a vision for “Beyond 2020”, participants acknowledged and reaffirmed the “2020 goal” of the sound management of chemicals and waste throughout their life cycle to prevent or minimize adverse effects on human health and the environment.

Additionally, it was suggested to develop a simple, clear, concise and ambitious vision that would have impact on the general population. Examples suggested were: A pollution-free world, a toxic-free world, a future-detoxified and a pollution-free planet. The vision should incorporate the aspect of the right to a healthy environment and the right to human health, and further that the chemicals and waste agenda be internalized with parliamentarians, politicians and decision makers. The vision should not necessarily be limited by the current links to 2030 agenda and should add new issues while maintaining existing emerging policy issues.

(II)Policy principles The future approach should reaffirm some of the principles from Rio and other core Strategic Approach documents, such as the Dubai Declaration. Some suggested possible principles include:

Polluter-pays Precautionary approach Circular economy Zero waste Substitution/ Access to information

replacement and environmentally appropriate alternatives to hazardous substances

Sustainable consumption and production/integrated life cycle approach

Extended producer responsibility

Good governance Right to know Science-policy interface Full participation of women, vulnerable

groups, and stakeholders/inclusivity Protection of children, workers/inclusivity Intergenerational equity Agroecology Liability and compensation Proximity (waste) The right to a healthy environment Workplace right to know

(III)Priorities, objectives and milestonesPriorities for the Latin America and the Caribbean region

Participants at the meeting noted the following as priority issues:

Nanotechnology Biotechnology Lead in paint Chemicals in products Hazardous substances in electronics Plastics Highly hazardous pesticides Endocrine disruptors Environmentally persistent pollutants The development of science-based studies to inform political decisions Strengthened communication at all levels, including on risks and hazards

17

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

Participants further prioritized the establishment of a common goal and simple framework and promoted the development of a generic model with guidelines and a template that could be adapted by individual countries. In addition, demonstrating costs of inaction and benefits of action would be valuable tools for supporting work on chemicals and waste in the region.

While applauding the success of the Quick Start Programme, participants said any similar mechanism in the future should prioritize continuity and sustainable funding. Additionally, SAICM should develop its own mechanism regionally and nationally.

It was recommended that the priorities of SAICM and beyond be installed at national government level.

Objective and milestones

Participants at the meeting suggested that the objectives and milestones reflect those of the Sustainable Development Goals as laid out in Table 1 of document SAICM/IP.2/8 entitled Proposal on objectives in support of the 2030 Agenda and related milestones.

It was also suggested that there be qualitative and quantitative indicators to measure progress.

(IV)Implementation arrangements, governance and financingFacilitating implementation

The current multi-sectoral, multi-stakeholder relationships should be maintained, thereby ensuring representation from all relevant entities

Transparent mechanisms for the selection of projects to be implemented including systems for follow-up

Priority themes in projects such as in management programmes should be institutionalized and included in national action plans

Target governance groups and individuals to enhance implementation.

Representation must be included from health, labour, agriculture, fisheries, environment and natural resources sectors as well as NGOs, IGOs, local government, communities, industry and academia.

Interest should be raised in the youth community to impress upon them the importance of knowledge of sound chemicals and waste management, thereby impacting change on future behavior and development processes

Youth, academia and NGO projects at community level should be integrated Industry should implement concrete actions regarding environmental and social responsibility at

the sites of their facilities and ensure that those actions meet SAICM priorities

Suggestions for financing.

Participants emphasized that adequate, sustainable and predictable funding was crucial to address chemicals and waste management and that access to funding must be improved pointing to the need for a flexible funding system. Further suggestions for financing include:

A strengthened financing system such as that used for the Quick Start Programme Access to funds based on priorities identified by the country/region Designing and implementing economic instruments that apply principles such as the polluter pays,

extended responsibility of the producer, development of legislation, and taxation. In-country sustainable financing mechanisms such as tariffs Greater focus on non-traditional funding sources such as foundations, wealthy individuals or big

companies located in the region Establishment of a small regional secretariat or task force focused on seeking funding on behalf of

the region and from the region, and to process project proposals, perhaps through a selection committee based on SACIM members in the region that will ensure transparency on the selection process

18

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

Establishment of a set mechanism for countries to access funds and where project proposals are signed off by governments

The creation of a specific fund with mechanism to deal with the issues of chemicals and waste, of the type of the green climate fund

Additionally, participants noted that funding should not be bound by the Special Programme criteria for development aid regarding access to financing on environmental issues in the region. Similarly, funding also needs to take into account the situations in each country, and the fact that national processes can take a long time; overly strict project timelines/deadlines can impede implementation.

(V)High-level political commitment and visibility

At the international level

The theme for UNEA-4 could be on chemicals and waste, as this will coincide with the final stages of the process to define the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020, thus giving high-level visibility to the issue

SAICM should be promoted at existing regional political forums such as The Council for Trade and Economic Development (COTED), which promotes trade and economic development of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), and the Forum of ministers for the environment for Latin America and the Caribbean

International forums should serve as a platform to promote the work of SAICM

At the national level Promotion of a chemical safety policy Sensitization of decision makers – especially when there is a change of government – including

through social pressure Including SAICM commitments in the development plans of each country Establishment of a national chemicals’ safety commission with the participation of different

stakeholders Comprehensive management of chemicals in an inter-institutional manner Involvement of national planning actors/entities Awareness programmes for government officials Engagement with communities directly impacted by pollution/contamination encouraging grass-

roots mobilization to place pressure on high-level decision makers Development of a SAICM guide / manual for parliamentarians and decision makers that presents

the chemicals and waste management agenda and demonstrates the benefits on human health and the environment

Development of instruments that serve as a guide to countries to strengthen political commitment, to specify a National Policy on Chemicals and Waste and a that has a budget allocated for it

Generally Formalization of a financial mechanism Strengthening of regional structures and creating a network of regional technology Identifying a regional champion to drive the process of chemicals and waste management Communication campaigns on the topics of chemicals, branding of chemicals and waste, creating a

communication and visibility strategy for chemicals and waste and showing the benefits on human health and the environment.

Facilitating the empowerment of civil society on the issues of chemicals and waste Ensuring that the SAICM Clearing House Mechanism, or a similar process that succeeds it after

2020, is operational Development of tools or toolkits to determine/demonstrate the chronic effects of chemical

substances, which is difficult to establish, and that such research is sustainable

19

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

Links with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Development of a new national chemicals and waste action plan that takes into account Agenda 2030 and multilateral environmental agreements

Integration of the chemicals and waste agenda with the sustainable development goals in national plans, thereby identifying the necessary resources which can be dedicated to addressing these issues

Creating linkages between the topics attracting high political attention, ‘hot topics’ such as climate change and disaster risk reduction

Collate evidence linking health and disaster issues with chemicals and waste management

(VI)Reflections on the success of SAICM The success and effectiveness of SAICM.

Reflecting on the success of SAICM, participants highlighted the benefit of having a global work plan, which has provided an overview of what needed to be done. In addition, having a specific financing mechanism, such as for the Quick Start Programme, had facilitated implementation. One of the driving elements of SAICM was the Quick Start Programme, which was open not only to governments but also to NGOs. SAICM had been instrumental in increasing access to information and in obtaining technical support. The benefits of shared information and lessons learned have led to improved implementation.

Through SAICM, national chemicals’ management profiles had been developed. In addition, awareness of chemicals and waste issues has been raised across agencies, encouraging multi-sectoral and multi-stakeholder cooperation and has promoted collaboration among stakeholders regionally and globally. SAICM has also facilitated the development of chemicals and waste management agenda across different interest areas including the implementation of programmes to strengthen legislation. There has been a generation of areas of coordination within countries for the management of chemical substances, for example, arrangements such as a national commission of chemical substances, or the gathering of SAICM stakeholders to facilitate implementation at the national level.

As a result of work undertaken in SAICM, systems have been developed to address emerging issues. Further, there has been support for capacity building to address identified priority areas although some gaps still remain.

The SAICM integrated and multisectoral approach, as well as the voluntary approach thereof has been a success.

Improving chemicals and waste management in the future.

It was emphasized that chemicals and waste management in the future can only be ensured through commitment at the highest level. To improve chemicals and waste management the visibility of the related issues needs to be raised.

Any future system should maintain a multi-stakeholder approach, should implement projects at the regional and sub-regional level, and should develop a roadmap with measurable goals and targets. Participants emphasized the importance of the sustainability of projects and looking beyond them to focus on implementation of the lessons and concepts learned. It was suggested to improve the institutional arrangements for the implementation of SAICM not only at regional level; for that it is necessary to have technical centres for environment and health, industry, work, and other relevant sectors for a better implementation at the national level. It was also suggested to improve the operation of national bodies for the management of chemical substances, to facilitate implementation of SAICM at the national level

It was suggested that policies be established for training institutions to incorporate environmental management of chemicals and waste to effect an understanding of its importance to their lifecycle.

The importance of effective implementation mechanisms and monitoring tools was stressed as was the development of indicators of how each country was progressing in implementation and action plans.

Further suggestions included the incorporation of the elements of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals classification of highly dangerous pesticides; the involvement of WHO to promote coordination between health and the environment; that UNEP be joined by FAO, ILO and WHO when a resolution is adopted in SAICM.

20

SAICM/RM/LAC.5/5

(VII)Other considerations

It was suggested that work should include binding mechanisms that increase the transparency and greater access to information on carcinogenic, mutagenic and persistent organic pollutants that are currently not covered by other treaties and that may lead to their eventual prohibition.

Additionally, one suggestion was that the efforts of all existing initiatives, such as those of the multilateral environmental agreements, and sustainable development goals should be taken into consideration and not duplicated and that therefore SAICM should focus on emerging issues.

____________________

21