natural gas pipeline permitting in pennsylvania mr. andrew paterson vp of technical and regulatory,...

13
Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Upload: harry-carr

Post on 05-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Natural Gas Pipeline Permittingin Pennsylvania

Mr. Andrew PatersonVP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale CoalitionAugust 1, 2013 11 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 2: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Pipeline Permitting in PA

Clean Water Act (federal)

• Section 404 regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the US, including wetlands. It also authorizes the use of general permits should an individual state elect to do so.

• Pennsylvania has adopted a State Programmatic General Permit, PASPGP-4, which covers activities that are similar in nature and result in no more than minimal individual or cumulative adverse effects on the aquatic environment.

• Nationwide Permits (NWP) are used in other states.

2 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 3: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Pipeline Permitting in PA

Purpose of PASPGP-4

• Protect the aquatic resources of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

• Reduce the administrative burden of duplicative programs and increase efficiency for both the USACE and the PADEP through interagency cooperation.

• Improve the regulatory response time.

• Add predictability to the permit program for the applicant and general public.

3 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 4: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Permit Duration Data

4 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 5: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

PASPGP-4 vs. NWP

Single and Complete Project

• “Single & Complete Project” – PASPGP-4 is not consistent with NWP:

• Under PASPGP-4, all crossings associated with a specific project are added together for project categorization and review.

• Under NWP, each crossing is an independent project that is reviewed separately.

5 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 6: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

PASPGP-4 vs. NWP

Temporary Impacts

• PASPGP-4 includes temporary impacts when determining permit categorization.

• NWP evaluates permanent impacts to waters of the U.S. in the calculation of permit eligibility. It is not necessary to include temporary impacts because by definition, they are mitigated and do not accumulate.

6 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 7: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Temporary Impacts

7 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Before After

Page 8: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Temporary Impacts

8 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Before After

Page 9: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Permit Delays

Affect on Midstream Pipeline Project Permitting

• Since fourth Quarter of 2010, the majority of midstream pipeline permits in PA have been classified as “Category III” under PASPGP-4.

• The average permit processing is in excess of 145 days (compared to the Nationwide Permit Program 45-60 days).

• Despite the increase in review time, there has been no change in permitting outcomes or conditions of construction.

9 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 10: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Consequences of Process

Due to the backlog of pipeline permits in Pennsylvania, approximately 600 – 700 Marcellus wells remain shut-in, waiting for pipelines.

This affects revenue for both the industry and the royalty owners.

This also impacts the economy, which is deprived of readily available natural gas as an energy resource.

Pennsylvania is at a competitive disadvantage compared to other states.

10 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 11: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Solutions

Solutions to Permit Delays

• Eliminate the overall project concept under PASPGP-4 and limit the interpretation of “single and complete project” to the interpretation provided under the NWP.

• Monitor cumulative impacts of multiple single and complete projects independently of project review and authorization, as is done under the NWP.

• Follow the NWP practice of counting permanent impacts only (not temporary impacts) when determining permit categorization under PASPGP-4.

11 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 12: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Benefits for the Commonwealth

If the Solutions are Implemented:

• Permitting in PA will be more timely and predictable.

• Natural gas will be delivered more efficiently to the market.

• Strong environmental protections will remain in place.

• PA will be aligned with the May 17, 2013 Memorandum from President Obama to reduce government review and permitting timelines for infrastructure projects including pipeline projects.

12 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Page 13: Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting in Pennsylvania Mr. Andrew Paterson VP of Technical and Regulatory, Marcellus Shale Coalition August 1, 2013 1 1 | MARCELLUS

Thank you!

Marcellus Shale Coalition

www.marcelluscoalition.org

www.learnaboutshale.org

www.shaleinsight.com

Twitter.com/marcellusgas

Facebook.com/marcelluscoalition

13 | MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION