natural rubber based adhesive modified with starch and...
TRANSCRIPT
AASCIT Journal of Chemistry 2018; 4(1): 1-6
http://www.aascit.org/journal/chemistry
Keywords Adhesive,
Natural Rubber Latex,
Starch,
Reinforcer,
Bonding Strength
Received: October 8, 2017
Accepted: December 8, 2017
Published: January 25, 2018
Natural Rubber Based Adhesive Modified with Starch and Reinforcer
Opara Ifeoma Juliet1, Igwebike-Ossi Clementina Dilim
2,
Okudo Chijioke Okpara3, Onudibia Moses Ejike
4
1Department of Chemical Sciences, Federal University Wukari, Taraba, Nigeria 2Department of Industrial Chemistry, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria 3Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria 4Department of Pure and Applied Physics, Federal University Wukari, Taraba, Nigeria
Email address [email protected] (O. I. Juliet)
Citation Opara Ifeoma Juliet, Igwebike-Ossi Clementina Dilim, Okudo Chijioke Okpara, Onudibia Moses
Ejike. Natural Rubber Based Adhesive Modified with Starch and Reinforcer. AASCIT Journal of
Chemistry. Vol. 4, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-6.
Abstract Adhesives are used to join materials together by surface attachment. The natural rubber
adhesive formulated was good, although its bonding strength was improved by
incorporating starch and reinforcer into it. Cassava starch was modified chemically into
hydrolyzed, dextrinized and oxidized starch and added to natural rubber blend which
increased its adhesiveness. The reinforcer (ZnO) added to natural rubber increased its
bonding strength on paper, wood and bottle label. The reinforced natural rubber adhesive
and the three modified starch adhesive incorporated into rubber showed good bonding
strength compared to natural rubber. Hydrolyzed starch with natural rubber blend and
natural rubber with reinforcer adhesive showed exceptional good bonding strength.
1. Introduction
Natural Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) is a plant grown in tropical and sub- tropical
regions. In Nigeria, rubber plant is grown in large quantity in Emeabiam in Imo State,
Sapele in Delta State, Warri and Ughelli also in Delta State, Arochukwu in Abia State
and many other places in the southern region. This singular factor (availability) makes it
a cheap raw material for adhesive production.
Natural rubber latex is a colloid system having the rubber particles dispersed in water.
Latex particle size is varying approximately from 0.05 to 3µm [1]. It is obtained from the
trunk of rubber tree through a systematic” tapping “process. Latex (white fluid) is tacky
in nature, after collection, the latex is stabilized with NH3 and transported from the
plantation to where it will be processed. The synthetic latex is prepared from raw
materials based on Petroleum and/or coal which are non-renewable and, therefore, must
be used with economy [2].
The primary unique characteristics of natural rubber latex include high strength,
flexibility and elasticity [3]. This makes it suitable for various products, e.g., tires, under
the bonnet products, gloves, balloons, rubber bands, condoms, adhesives, etc. Natural
rubber latex which is a renewable resource can also be used as a water-based contact
adhesive. However, due to its unsaturated backbone chain nature, natural rubber adhesive
is not quite stable and is brittle when left for a period of time. On the other hand, natural
rubber adhesives show good resistance to water, but poor resistance to oils, organic
solvents, and chemical oxidizing agents [4]. Thus, it is necessary to add antioxidants and
stabilizer into the natural rubber latex adhesive [5]. The improved products from natural
rubber have potentially wide applications as a result of reinforcing with fillers such as
2 Opara Ifeoma Juliet et al.: Natural Rubber Based Adhesive Modified with Starch and Reinforcer
carbon black or silica, as well as physical blends with other
polymer particles or chemical modification, thus enabling
these materials to compete with synthetic rubbers [6].
1.1. Statement of Problem
Natural rubber is a renewable resource used in formulation
of adhesive but often the adhesive formulated using natural
rubber is not stable and is brittle when left for a period of
time due to its unsaturated back bone chain. Thus, structural
modification is required to improve its bonding strength
using starch and reinforcer.
1.2. Composition of Latex
The table below shows the various constituents of natural
rubber
Table 1. Composition of latex.
Constituents % Composition
Rubber particles (cis-1, poly isoprene) 30.0-40.0
Protein 2.0-3.0
Water 55.0-65.0
Steryl glycosides 0.1-0.5
Resins 1.5-3.5
Ash 0.5-1.0
Sugars 1.0-2.0
Changes in season, soil, tapping methods, weather etc.;
exhibits wide variation in the composition of the natural latex
[7]. Recently, several proteins in natural rubber were found to
cause type I allergic responses that led to life-threatening
anaphylactic reactions. In 1991, the FDA stipulated that rubber
products made from natural rubber latex (e.g., gloves and
condoms) should be treated to remove extractable protein [8].
An adhesive is defined by the American Society for testing
and materials (ASTM) as substance capable of holding
materials together by surface attachment [9]. Adhesives
accomplish this goal by transmitting stresses from one
member to another in a manner that distributes the stresses
much more uniformly than can be achieved with mechanical
fasteners [10].
1.3. Structure of Natural Rubber
Rubber is a polymer of the diene hydrocarbon isoprene.
The isoprene has a molecular formula (C5H8)n. The isoprene
units are linked “head to tail” as residual double bond
occurring in the middle of each segment and within the main
backbone. In the polyisoprene molecule cis-isomerism occur
when all methyl group lie on the same side of the chain,
trans-isomerism occur when all methyl group alternate from
one side to the other. The two quite distinct forms of the
polymeric hydrocarbon as cis 1, 4-poly isoprene and trans-1,
4-poly isoprene are represented below.
Figure 1. Cis-1, 4-Polyisoprene.
Figure 2. Trans-1, 4 Poly isoprene natural rubbers.
Aim of the Research
The aim of this research is to formulate a natural rubber
based adhesive and compare its bonding strength with natural
rubber adhesive modified with starch and reinforcer.
2. Materials and Methods
The natural rubber latex used for this research was
obtained from natural rubber plantation in Emeabiam in Imo
state. The reagents used were of analytical grade.
2.1. Rubber Latex
Fresh from the tree, rubber latex is neutral but due to some
enzymatic activities of some bacteria it coagulates resulting
in separation into clots of rubber and clear serum putrefaction
giving off bad odour. This was prevented by storing it in
ammonia solution. 450 ml ammonia solution was added to
1500 ml of latex. Ammonia solution is preferred to other
preservative because it has bactericidal properties and
increases the pH of the system (which has been decreased by
the bacteria), thus making it more stable. Before using the
rubber for formulation the rubber was deammoniated. This
involves the process of removing ammonia by evaporating
the ammonia in air or addition of acid, centrifugation or other
means. For the purpose of this project addition of weak acid
method was used to neutralize the ammonia.
Deammonification of Natural Rubber latex
450 ml of acetic acid was added to the natural latex on
which 450 ml of ammonia was initially added to; it hardened
the rubber latex into a white mass. This white mass was left
under the sun for 24 hours. It was shredded and left under the
sun for another 24hours before been used to formulate
adhesive. It was then dissolved in a suitable solvent (toluene)
to produce the adhesive. Rubber is almost soluble in all
aliphatic solvent. As a polymer, it first swells after absorbing
and dissolves slowly to form a cloudy solution. The softness
or tackiness is promoted by the reaction with oxygen.
AASCIT Journal of Chemistry 2018; 4(1): 1-6 3
2.2. Formulation of Paper Adhesive Using
Natural Rubber Latex Modified with
Hydrolyzed Starch
Rubber latex is used in wide range adhesives, particularly
for porous surfaces. Based on its application, the proportion
of latex may be small to give a degree of flexibility or may
be large as in paper adhesives. A wide range of compounding
ingredients are used, examples include tackifiers, fillers,
starches, plasticizers and reinforcers
Procedure
Shredded rubber was added in a 500 ml beaker and 30 ml
of toluene was added. This was stirred vigorously for 2
hours. Starch 30 g was suspended in 80 ml of water and
stirred vigorously for 30 minutes. NaOH pellets (2g) were
added while stirring until complete gelation of the starch was
achieved, 2 ml HCl (8ml) was added to neutralize the
adhesive. The resulting adhesive was extended with glycerol
(3 ml) and 2 ml of formalin was added as preservative.
2.2.1. Formulation of Paper Adhesive Using
Natural Rubber Latex Modified with
Dextrinized Starch
Procedure
1.3 g of shredded rubber was put in a 500 ml beaker and 35
ml of toluene was added. This was stirred vigorously for 2
hours. 40 g of starch was mixed with 5 ml of 0.1 M HCl and
then roasted for 30 minutes. The roasted starch was then ground
into powder form. This was then poured into 150 ml of warm
water heated to 70°C and thoroughly stirred with a mechanical
stirrer. 2M solution of caustic soda was added to increase the
viscosity. The rubber solution was added and stirred vigorously.
2 ml of formalin was added as a preservative. Also 0.2 g of
Borax was added to increase the drying speed.
2.2.2. Formulation of Adhesive Using Natural
Rubber Latex Modified with Oxidized
Starch
Procedure
2g of Shredded Rubber was put in a 250ml beaker and
50ml of toluene was added. This was stirred vigorously for 2
hours. 60 g of starch was mixed with 2g of Na2CO3 and 16
ml of H2O2 in a 500ml beaker and the mixture stirred
vigorously for 30 minutes. 100ml of water was then used to
suspend the starch. 4g of NaOH pellets were added while
stirring until complete gelling of starch occurred. 12 ml of
2M of HCl was added. The scrubber solution was added as a
tackifier. The adhesive was extended with 10 ml glycerol and
2ml of formalin was added as a preservative.
2.2.3. Formulation of Natural Rubber Latex
Adhesive
Procedure
The shredded rubber (6 g) was added in a 500 ml beaker
and 150 ml of toluene was added. This was stirred
continuously for 2 hours to obtain a viscous solution (A). The
toluene is indeed a good solvent and acts as a plasticizers and
functions to improve the film-forming ability of the adhesive
without imparting undue softness in the final solution. The
slurry of dispersion B which contains water, casein
(stabilizer), CaCO3 (filler), glycerol (extender/plasticizer),
NH4Cl (accelerator), NaOH pellets (tackifier), gum Arabic,
CH3COONa (corrosion retarder), C6H5COONa (preservative)
was prepared with hot water (95°C). It was then stirred into
rubber solution. A mixture of A and B was obtained.
A+B→AB
2.2.4. Formulation of Natural Rubber Latex
Adhesive Modified with Reinforcer
The procedure is the same as stated above. This was prepared
to see the effect of reinforcer (ZnO) on adhesive formulation.
3. Result and Discussion
The results and performance test of natural rubber
modified with starch are illustrated below
3.1. Natural Rubber Adhesive Modified with
Hydrolyzed Starch
Observation
A physical appearance milky paste was obtained with a pH
of 11. The adhesive was found to be perfect for labeling,
since it adhered strongly. This shows the effect of rubber
latex being a good tackifier and gel property of starch
produce a good adhesive with enhanced adhesiveness.
Performance test
a) Paper to paper bonding
Time taken to observe the fiber tearing bond is 80s after
temper time of 30 seconds.
b) Bottle labeling
Time taken to observe tearing bond is 240 s after temper
time of 60 seconds.
3.2. Paper Adhesive Using Natural Rubber
Modified with Dextrinized Starch
Observation
A light brown paste was obtained with a pH of 8
The adhesive adhered strongly on paper. Performance test
a) Paper to paper labeling
Time taken to observe the fibre tearing bond is 60 s after
temper time of 30 s
b) Bottle labeling
Time taken to observe the fibre tearing bond is 300 s after
temper time of 60 s
3.3. Natural Rubber Modified with Oxidized
Starch Adhesive
Observation
A white paste was obtained with a pH of 11.
The adhesive was seen to be good for labeling and
packaging. This is as a result of addition of starch to rubber
latex adhesive which enhanced its bonding strength.
Performance test
4 Opara Ifeoma Juliet et al.: Natural Rubber Based Adhesive Modified with Starch and Reinforcer
a) Paper to paper bonding
Time taken to observe the fibre tearing bond is 65 s after
temper time of 30 s
b) Bottle labeling
Time taken to observe the fiber tearing bond is 280s after
temper time of 60 s
3.4. Natural Rubber Latex Adhesive
Observation
A milky paste was obtained with pH of 11. The result of
this formula was very good in terms of viscosity, tackiness
and bonding strength. It was tested on wood, paper and
leather and adhesive strength was excellent.
Performance test
a) Paper to paper bonding
Time taken to observe the fiber tearing bond is 150 s after
temper time of 30 seconds
b) Bottle labeling
Time taken to observe the fiber tearing bond is 420s after
60 s
c) Wood bonding
Time taken to separate two pieces of wood joined by this
adhesive is 30 s after temper time of 30 seconds.
The bonding strength comparison of natural rubber modified
with starch adhesive and unmodified natural rubber adhesive on
paper is represented in table 2 and figure 3 while the comparison
on bottle label is represented in table 3 and figure 4
3.5. Natural Rubber Adhesive Modified with
Reinforcer
Observation
An orange colour adhesive was obtained due to addition of
methyl orange. It has a pH of 8. The adhesive gave a very
good yield and proves excellent for paper and leather works.
This shows that reinforcers improve bonding strength of
natural rubber when incorporated into adhesive formulation.
Reinforcement is a simple method to reduce defects. The
reinforcement of natural rubber depends on reinforcing
agents. It has been reported that Silica-reinforced natural
rubber prepared via a sol-gel process is promising and has
been widely used [11]. Also it has been reported that carbon
particles play important role in reinforcing the rubber and
enhancing the cohesion forces in vulcanized polyisoprene
[12]. Organically modified montmorilonite (OMMT) nano
clay incorporated into the natural rubber showed significant
improvement in tensile strength, elongation and thermal
stability [13].
Performance test
The performance test of the adhesive on paper, wood and
leather are illustrated below.
a) Paper to paper bonding
The time taken to observe the fiber tearing bond is 120 s
after temper time of 30 seconds
b) Wood bonding
Time taken to separate two pieces of wood joined by this
adhesive is 60 s after temper time of 30 s
c) Leather bonding
The time taken to separate two pieces of leather after
bonding is 30 s after temper time of 30 s
The comparison of bonding strength of natural rubber
modified with reinforcer adhesive and unmodified natural
rubber adhesive on paper is represented in table 4 and figure
5 while the comparison on wood is represented in table 5 and
figure 6
Table 2. Comparison of Bonding Strength of Natural Rubber Latex adhesive modified with starch and unmodified Rubber Latex adhesive on Paper.
Adhesive Temper time (s) Time taken to obtain the fiber tearing (bonding strength) (s)
Oxidized Starch and Natural Rubber Adhesive 30 65
Hydrolyzed Starch and Natural Rubber adhesive 30 80
Dextrinized Starch and Natural Rubber Adhesive 30 60
Natural Rubber Latex 30 150
Table 3. Comparison of Bonding Strength of natural rubber latex adhesive modified with starch and unmodified rubber latex adhesive on bottle for label.
Adhesive Temper time (s) Time taken to obtain the fiber tearing (bonding strength) (s)
Oxidized Starch and Natural Rubber Adhesive 60 280
Hydrolyzed Starch and Natural Rubber adhesive 60 240
Dextrinized Starch and Natural Rubber Adhesive 60 300
Natural Rubber Latex 60 420
Table 4. Comparison of Natural rubber adhesive and natural rubber modified with reinforcers on paper.
Adhesive Temper time (s) Time taken to obtain the fiber tearing (bonding strength) (s)
Natural rubber latex adhesive 30 150
Natural Rubber adhesive with reinforcer 30 120
Table 5. Comparison of Natural rubber adhesive and natural rubber modified with reinforcer on Wood.
Adhesive Temper time (s) Separation Time of two pieces of wood glued together (s)
Natural rubber latex adhesive 30 30
Natural Rubber adhesive with reinforcer 30 60
AASCIT Journal of Chemistry 2018; 4(1): 1-6 5
Figure 3. Comparison of bonding strength of natural rubber latex modified with starch adhesive and unmodified rubber latex adhesive on paper.
Figure 4. Comparison of bonding strength natural rubber latex adhesive with starch modified and unmodified rubber latex adhesive on bottle for label.
Figure 5. Comparison of Natural rubber adhesive and natural rubber modified with reinforcers on paper.
6 Opara Ifeoma Juliet et al.: Natural Rubber Based Adhesive Modified with Starch and Reinforcer
Figure 6. Comparison of Natural rubber adhesive and natural rubber modified with reinforcer on Wood.
4. Conclusion
Natural rubber is a cheap and readily available raw
material for adhesive production. It is tacky in nature but it is
brittle and not stable, this is as a result of the unsaturation of
its back bone and as such there was need for it to be
improved. This research compared the natural rubber starch
and the one incorporated with starch and reinforcers. It was
observed that the one with reinforcer and modified starch had
good bonding strength on paper, wood and bottle labels more
than the unmodified natural rubber latex.
From the findings natural rubber modified with reinforcers
and starch increased its adhesiveness and bonding strength
and can compete with synthetic natural rubber.
Recommendation
This research is based on formulation of adhesive using
natural rubber and comparing its bonding strength with
natural rubber modified with starch and reinforcer. I
recommend that further work should be carried out on natural
rubber using varieties of reinforcers to improve its properties
for commercial production.
References
[1] Leonardo Da Vinci, (2007) Rubber Chemistry. ©Matador Rubber s.r.o
[2] Ochigbo Stephen, Roheem Fatima and Ajai Alexander Ikechukwu (2010). Adhesive formulations with ternary blends using simple lattice design. International Journal of the Physical Sciences Vol. 5 (13), pp. 2098-2103.
[3] J R. Rosin, M. Y. Amir Hashim and P. T. Augurio (2012). Natural Latex Foam. Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 8, 15–27.
[4] Adhesives.specialchem.com downloaded on 6/10/2017
[5] Pranee Chumsamrong and Oukrit Monprasit (2007). Preparation, adhesive performance and stability of natural rubber latex grafted with n-butyl acrylate (BA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA). Suranaree J. Sci. Technol. 14 (3): 269-276
[6] Wanvimon Arayapranee and Garry L. Rempel (2013). Effects of Polarity on the Filler-Rubber Interaction and Properties of Silica Filled Grafted Natural Rubber Composites. Journal of Polymers http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/279529
[7] M T. Jayanthy, P. E. Sankaranarayanan Sathyabama (2005). Measurement of Dry Rubber Content in Latex Using Microwave Technique. MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW, Volume 5, Section 3.
[8] Jitladda T. Sakdapipanich and Porntip Rojruthai (2012). Molecular Structure of Natural Rubber and Its Characteristics Based on Recent Evidence, Biotechnology - Molecular Studies and Novel Applications for Improved Quality of Human Life, Prof. Reda Sammour (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0151-2, In Tech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/biotechnology-molecular-studies-and-novel-applications-for-improvedquality-of-human-life/molecular-structure-of-natural-rubber-and-its-characteristics-based-on-recent-evidence
[9] Herman. F. Mark, Norman. G. Encyclopedia of polymer Science and Technology. Volume 1, 1964, p. 482.
[10] Adhesives technology handbook 2nd Edition, edited by Sina Ebnesajjad, (2008). William Andrew Inc.
[11] Sirilak Phomrak and Muenduen Phisalaphong 2017) Reinforcement of Natural Rubber with Bacterial Cellulose via Latex Aqueous Microdispersion Process. Hindawi Journal of Nanomaterials. P. 1-9.
[12] Mahmoud Kardan, Robert Ferguson, and Rebecca Seitz (2016) Impact of Carbon Black on Durability of Vulcanized Rubbers. Vernay flow control solutions, P. 1-5.
[13] Benson. U. Da, Abdul Majeed. S. S. Ma*, Rajesh Babub (2016) Natural rubber / OMMT nanocomposites for reinforcement in tyre ply. International Journal of NanoScience and Nanotechnology. Volume 7, Number 1, pp. 41-55.