nature relatedness and the happy path to sustainability ......(the nature related path to happiness)...

42
Nature Relatedness and the Happy Path to Sustainability Elizabeth (Lisa) Nisbet Nature Heals Conference, March 14-15, 2013

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jul-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

and

the

Hap

py P

ath

to S

usta

inab

ility

Eliz

abet

h (L

isa)

Nis

bet

N

atur

e H

eals

Con

fere

nce,

Mar

ch 1

4-15

, 201

3

W

hy p

sych

olog

y?

 En

viro

nmen

tal s

usta

inab

ility

 In

divi

dual

diff

eren

ces i

n na

ture

rela

tedn

ess

 R

esea

rch:

- wel

l-bei

ng/h

appi

ness

- s

usta

inab

le b

ehav

iour

 Im

plic

atio

ns a

nd a

pplic

atio

n

Why

psy

chol

ogy?

 H

uman

beh

avio

ur in

fluen

ces t

he e

nviro

nmen

t

 En

viro

nmen

tal p

robl

ems a

ffec

t hum

an h

ealth

 W

hat m

otiv

ates

env

ironm

enta

l beh

avio

ur

Det

erm

inan

ts o

f Env

iron

men

tal B

ehav

iour

 St

ruct

ural

fact

ors:

SES

, geo

grap

hy, i

nfra

stru

ctur

e

 Ps

ycho

logi

cal f

acto

rs: n

orm

s, gu

ilt, h

elpl

essn

ess

Rai

sing

Aw

aren

ess

Info

rmat

ion

alon

e ≠

beha

viou

r

Do

We

Nee

d N

atur

e?

 E.

O. W

ilson

’s B

ioph

ilia

Hyp

othe

sis

 Ev

olut

iona

ry h

isto

ry

 Su

gges

tive

evid

ence

:

nat

ure

scen

es, p

ets,

outd

oor a

ctiv

ities

, ga

rden

ing,

zoo

s, of

fice

wor

kers

/pla

nts

 Cog

nitiv

e bi

ophi

lia

(e.g

., sm

art a

s a ..

.)

 Adv

ertis

ing,

AA

T, e

mpr

ical

evi

denc

e

 Indi

vidu

al d

iffer

ence

s?

Do

We

Nee

d N

atur

e?

Mea

suri

ng C

onne

cted

ness

: T

he N

atur

e R

elat

edne

ss S

cale

 In

divi

dual

diff

eren

ces i

n su

bjec

tive

conn

ecte

dnes

s

 C

ogni

tive,

aff

ectiv

e, p

hysi

cal r

elat

ions

hip

with

nat

ure

Sam

ple

Item

s:

My

rela

tions

hip

to n

atur

e is

an

impo

rtant

par

t of w

ho I

am

I fee

l ver

y co

nnec

ted

to a

ll liv

ing

thin

gs a

nd th

e ea

rth.

Ani

mal

s, bi

rds,

and

plan

ts sh

ould

hav

e fe

wer

righ

ts th

an h

uman

s (R)

I enj

oy b

eing

out

door

s, ev

en in

unp

leas

ant w

eath

er.

I tak

e no

tice

of w

ildlif

e w

here

ver I

am

.

Val

idity

: Nat

ure

Rel

ated

Act

iviti

es

 N

atur

e re

late

d pe

ople

ow

n pe

ts, b

uy o

rgan

ic,

volu

ntee

r, sp

end

time

outd

oors

 A

bet

ter p

redi

ctor

of b

ehav

iour

Nat

ure

is G

ood

for

Us

 Mod

ern

lifes

tyle

s – Is

dis

conn

ectio

n re

late

d to

un

happ

ines

s?

Nat

ure

Is G

ood

For

You

 Urb

an c

entre

s and

nat

ure

depr

ivat

ion

– in

terv

entio

n re

stor

ed S

E, se

lf-ef

ficac

y, p

erce

ptio

n, a

ggre

ssio

n,

empa

thy

for n

atur

e

 Pla

ygro

unds

and

chi

ld d

evel

opm

ent,

wal

king

to sc

hool

(o

besi

ty/d

rivin

g vs

. opp

ortu

nity

to o

bser

ve w

ildlif

e)

 Pro

xim

ity to

gre

en sp

ace

- mor

talit

y be

nefit

s, re

duce

s A

DH

D sy

mpt

oms

Nat

ure

Con

tact

/Im

ages

and

Hea

lth

 Ph

ysic

al h

ealth

ben

efits

of n

atur

e an

d na

tura

l im

ages

h

ospi

tal,

pris

on st

udie

s, w

all a

rt, e

tc.

 Em

piric

al e

vide

nce

for s

tress

redu

ctio

n,

rela

xatio

n, a

ttent

iona

l res

tora

tion,

ph

ysic

al h

ealin

g (e

.g.,

bloo

d pr

essu

re,

hear

t rat

e, c

ortis

ol)

Atte

ntio

n R

esto

ratio

n Th

eory

- so

ft (e

ffor

tless

) vs.

hard

(int

ense

, riv

etin

g)

fasc

inat

ion

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

and

Hap

pine

ss

 Li

fe sa

tisfa

ctio

n

 Su

bjec

tive

Hap

pine

ss

 Po

sitiv

e af

fect

 Fa

scin

atio

n, a

we

 N

egat

ive

affe

ct

 D

epre

ssio

n

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

and

Wel

l-Bei

ng

 Pe

rson

al G

row

th

 A

uton

omy

 Pu

rpos

e

 V

italit

y

A b

ette

r pre

dict

or o

f hap

pine

ss th

an e

nviro

nmen

tal

attit

udes

A d

istin

ct c

ontri

buto

r to

wel

l-bei

ng

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

Peo

ple

are

Hap

pier

St

udy

1a

Stud

y 1b

a Po

sitiv

e af

fect

.2

9**

.33*

* N

egat

ive

affe

ct

-.11

-.29*

* A

uton

omy

.28*

* .2

6**

Pers

onal

Gro

wth

.2

9**

.29*

* Pu

rpos

e in

Life

.1

9*

.23*

* En

viro

nmen

tal M

aste

ry

.09

.28*

* Se

lf A

ccep

tanc

e .1

8*

.30*

* Po

sitiv

e R

elat

ions

with

Oth

ers

.10

.22*

* Li

fe S

atis

fact

ion

.13

.24*

* *

p <

. 05,

**

p <

.01

a Pa

rtial

ling

out t

he e

ffect

s of N

EP, N

EC, E

colo

gy sc

ale

(act

ual c

omm

itmen

t/affe

ct).

Dis

tinct

Impo

rtan

ce o

f Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

 C

ontro

lling

for C

ompo

site

of C

onne

cted

ness

– 

coun

try, c

ultu

re, f

amily

, mus

ic, h

ome,

frie

nds

Nis

bet,

E. K

., &

Zel

ensk

i, J.

M. (

in p

ress

). H

appi

ness

and

feel

ing

conn

ecte

d: T

he d

istin

ct ro

le o

f na

ture

rela

tedn

ess.

Envi

ronm

ent a

nd B

ehav

ior.

(Sch

ultz

’s In

clus

ion

of N

atur

e in

Sel

f mea

sure

)

NR

’s li

nk w

ith h

appi

ness

is in

depe

nden

t of a

gen

eral

ly

conn

ecte

d pe

rson

ality

Hap

pine

ss a

nd C

onne

cted

ness

Cor

rela

tions

in th

e C

omm

unity

Sam

ple

(n =

415

)

Scal

e C

onne

ctio

n C

ompo

site

IN

S Pa

rtia

l r

INS

NR

P

arti

al r

N

R

Subj

ectiv

e H

appi

ness

.4

6***

.3

4***

.1

4**

.19*

**

.11*

Sa

tisfa

ctio

n w

ith L

ife

.44*

**

.34*

**

.15*

* .1

6**

.07

Posi

tive

Aff

ect

.43*

**

.42*

**

.26*

**

.29*

**

.22*

**

Neg

ativ

e A

ffec

t -.

25**

* -.

16**

* -.

05

-.07

-.

02

Nat

ure

Posi

tive

Aff

ect

.28*

**

.37*

**

.28*

**

.33*

**

.28*

**

Vita

lity

.44*

**

.38*

**

.20*

**

.27*

**

.20*

**

Aut

onom

y .2

5***

.2

7***

.1

7***

.2

5***

.1

9***

Pers

onal

Gro

wth

.3

0***

.3

6***

.2

6***

.3

4***

.2

9***

Purp

ose

in L

ife

.36*

**

.26*

**

.11*

.2

1***

.1

4**

Dep

ress

ion

-.29

***

-.16

***

-.02

-.

03

.03

*p <

.05,

**p

< .0

1, *

**p

<. 0

01

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

at W

ork

(and

Hom

e)

 Pe

rson

al g

row

th, a

gree

able

ness

, ope

nnes

s  

Gre

ater

qua

lity

and

freq

uenc

y of

out

door

/nat

ure

time

 N

atur

e/ou

tdoo

r tim

e re

late

d to

: po

sitiv

e em

otio

ns

(hom

e A

ND

wor

k), p

rodu

ctiv

ity (w

ork

and

pers

onal

go

als)

, job

and

life

satis

fact

ion

 Sp

illov

er o

f nat

ure

bene

fits f

rom

leis

ure

to w

ork

Can

We

Cha

nge

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

?

 Ec

olog

ical

kno

wle

dge/

liter

acy

 Lo

ngitu

dina

l stu

dy o

f env

ironm

enta

l edu

catio

n st

uden

ts, c

ompa

red

to c

ontro

ls

 C

hang

es in

nat

ure

rela

tedn

ess,

envi

ronm

enta

l atti

tude

s, w

ell-b

eing

, ove

r 3 m

onth

s

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

Ove

r T

ime

2

2.5 3

3.5 4

4.5

Beg

inni

ng

End

Con

trol

Envi

ronm

ent

Cha

nge

in V

italit

y &

Sus

tain

able

Att

itude

s

Cou

rse

(E

nv. v

s. C

ontro

l)

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

Vita

lity

&

Sust

aina

bilit

y

(The

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

Pat

h to

Hap

pine

ss) (

Nis

bet e

t al.,

200

9, 2

011)

But

cle

arly

mor

e w

ork

to b

e do

ne o

n ‘in

terv

entio

ns’

 Tr

ait l

evel

con

nect

ion

is a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith m

ore

natu

re c

onta

ct a

nd (s

ome

type

s) w

ell-b

eing

 N

atur

e ex

perie

nces

link

ed w

ith w

ell-b

eing

 Po

tent

ial b

enef

its o

f “st

ate”

rela

tedn

ess?

 W

hat a

bout

nea

rby

natu

re, d

iffer

ence

s in

built

and

na

tura

l env

ironm

ents

?

Nat

ure

Con

tact

and

Hap

pine

ss

Wal

king

Stu

dy 1

 U

nive

rsity

stud

ents

– “

impr

essi

ons o

f cam

pus”

 R

ando

m a

ssig

nmen

t to

indo

or o

r out

door

wal

k

 A

utum

n, a

ll no

n-ra

iny

days

 Po

st-w

alk

wel

l-bei

ng: “

How

do

you

feel

righ

t now

?”

Peop

le p

refe

r th

e ou

tdoo

r w

alk

(Als

o vi

talit

y, fa

scin

atio

n)

 Si

mila

r met

hodo

logy

as s

tudy

1, b

ut a

dded

...

 Pr

e-w

alk

affe

ctiv

e fo

reca

stin

g - p

redi

ctio

ns o

f ha

ppin

ess (

posi

tive/

nega

tive

affe

ct)

 St

ate

happ

ines

s mea

sure

d af

ter w

alk

Wal

king

Stu

dy 2

Peop

le u

nder

-pre

dict

the

bene

fits o

f ou

tdoo

r w

alks

 R

eplic

ated

resu

lts fr

om st

udie

s 1 a

nd 2

with

diff

eren

t de

sign

 R

ando

m a

ssig

nmen

t to

wal

k lo

catio

n

 R

ando

m a

ssig

nmen

t to

eith

er p

redi

ct o

r exp

erie

nce

 M

ood

bene

fits o

f nea

rby

natu

re a

re u

nder

estim

ated

; Fo

reca

stin

g er

rors

occ

ur b

oth

betw

een

and

with

in

pers

on

Wal

king

Stu

dy 3

Fore

st e

colo

gy w

alk

- a lo

ok a

t for

est e

colo

gy

patte

rns a

nd p

roce

sses

Moc

k ca

noe

trip

- pad

dle

and

porta

ge th

roug

h a

5 da

y ca

noe

trip

in 2

hou

rs, a

ctiv

ities

Eve

n ou

tdoo

r ed

ucat

ors e

rr in

aff

ectiv

e fo

reca

stin

g

Pred

ictio

n Pr

edic

tion

Expe

rienc

e Ex

perie

nce

3

3.5 4

Posi

tive A

ffec

t V

italit

y

Rating

Hap

pine

ss o

f nat

ure

imag

es a

lso

unde

rest

imat

ed

Cha

ngin

g N

atur

e R

elat

edne

ss (i

n th

e sh

ort t

erm

)

 C

ampu

s wal

k st

udie

s

(The

hap

py p

ath

to su

stai

nabi

lity)

(IN

S)

Loca

tion

(In

vs. O

ut)

Posi

tive A

ffect

Nat

ure

R

elat

edne

ss

Fish

ing

Beh

avio

ur

Futu

re D

irec

tions

and

App

licat

ions

Inte

rven

tions

(min

imum

dos

e, la

stin

g ef

fect

s)

 Ex

perim

enta

l Met

hods

(ele

men

ts/m

echa

nism

s, an

tece

dant

s)

 U

rban

Des

ign

(act

ive

com

mut

ing,

hea

lth p

rom

otio

n an

d po

licy,

inte

rdis

cipl

inar

y co

llabo

ratio

n)

 M

essa

ging

(fra

min

g, h

ealth

)

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

Res

earc

h

Doe

s bei

ng a

‘citi

zen

scie

ntis

t’ af

fect

moo

d an

d co

nnec

tedn

ess w

ith n

atur

e?

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

Res

earc

h N

ON

-IN

VA

SIV

E G

RIZ

ZL

Y B

EA

R T

RA

CK

ING

ST

UD

Y

Mor

e na

ture

rel

ated

, and

ha

ppie

r ci

tizen

scie

ntis

ts

1 2 3 4

Posi

tive A

ffect

N

egat

ive A

ffect

Fa

scin

atio

n V

italit

y

Mean

Wel

l-Bei

ng

Pre-

Trip

Post

-Trip

Nat

ure

Rel

ated

ness

Res

earc

h Ec

olog

y +

Psyc

holo

gy =

WIL

DL

IFE

DE

TE

CT

IVE

S

C

SI S

TU

DY

Ben

efits

of C

onne

cted

ness

 C

ompl

emen

tary

, not

com

petin

g go

als

 H

ealth

of p

eopl

e an

d th

e pl

anet

are

in

terc

onne

cted

(e.g

., ac

tive

com

mut

ing)

 So

lutio

ns n

eed

inte

rdis

cipl

inar

y co

llabo

ratio

n

Hap

py P

eopl

e, H

appy

Pla

net

Jass

andr

e Ada

myk

Rob

ert H

ill

Rae

lyne

Dop

ko

M

ira L

egau

lt M

ary

Gic

k

Ste

ven

Mur

phy

Meg

an G

raha

m

L

ogan

Nea

lis

Zsuz

sa G

rand

pier

re-N

agy

Ste

phan

ie P

inea

u Je

nnife

r Rou

se

S

cott

Smed

ley

John

Zel

ensk

i So

cial

Sci

ence

s and

Hum

aniti

es R

esea

rch

Cou

ncil

Tha

nks t

o

Con

tact

: el

izab

ethn

isbe

t@tr

entu

.ca

Psyc

holo

gy D

epar

tmen

t Tr

ent U

nive

rsity

D

NA

C10

4 Pe

terb

orou

gh, O

ntar

io

Can

ada

K9J

7B

8 (7

05) 7

48-1

011

ext.

7855

fa

x: (7

05) 7

48-1

580

nat

urer

elat

edne

ss.c

a

Tha

nk Y

ou!