nbar monmouthshire project r austin principal school improvement officer inclusion & behaviour
TRANSCRIPT
NBAR
Monmouthshire Project
R Austin Principal School Improvement Officer Inclusion & Behaviour
Monmouthshire Background
4 Comprehensives 1 Special 32 Primary Schools
Monmouthshire Background
Major budget issues Directorate facing £4million cuts Audit commission report 2007 Closure of Provision KS3/4 2008 EOTAS-home tuition
Monmouthshire
Rural Local Authority 4 Major Population Centres Location of PRS Provision Capacity Issues No Key Stage 1 and 2 Specialist Provision Used UPSS to offer advice and support to schools
Multi-Agency Working Established
Cluster based multi-agency working groups
Meet half termly
Agendas established by host secondary school
Cluster primaries are able to refer cases
Problem solving approach
Still dependant upon other agencies for services to pupils
Monmouthshire Strategic Network Group
Strategic group established- Director Chairs Shared the vision Agreed the improvement plan Policy and processes Met half termly initially, now meet termly
Performance
2007-2008
8 permanent exclusions
2207 days FTE
18th in Wales
Strategic Approach
Formation of virtual PRS
Pupils on roll
Appropriate Provision
Developed Individual Learner Engagement Programmes
Operational Group SING
Multi-agency Operational Group Social Inclusion Network Group established
Previous meeting patterns were restructured
Initially focussed on addressing pupils
Now focussing on longer term provision and issues
Strengths/Weaknesses
Strategic Group Operational Group Youth Access Workers in schools
Reliant on other agencies in addressing issues
No posts able to work across agencies
WAG Bid
External factors that have an impact upon behaviour
Met with senior colleagues in Social Housing Services and Youth Offending Service
Submitted bid for two posts
Social Inclusion Project Workers
Aim to work with children and young people across all key stages
who are at risk of exclusion/disaffection as a result of external factors
WAG Bid
Referral process agreed
Linked to existing systems
Referral can come from multi-agency meetings
Referrals also made by PSIO Inclusion & Behaviour
Social Inclusion Project Workers
Varied background
Youth Offending and Social Services
Youth Access and school based
Social Inclusion Project Workers
Commenced March 2010 Training Restorative Justice Seal Parenting Courses School systems Exclusion process Social Housing Services processes Youth Offending Service processes
Referrals
Secondary school pupils- 6
Special school- 2
Primary schools- 10
Referred by
Primary Schools 6 Secondary Schools 3 Special School 1 Clinical Psychologist 1 Social Housing Services 3 Principal Officer Inclusion & Behaviour 4
Work required
Liaison with School, Youth Service, YOS, College, PRS Liaison with Special School, foster carer, social worker and youth worker attached to pupil Sessional support re social care issues , liaison with school, foster carer Visits and liaison with aspects of pupil’s learner engagement programmes, liaison with
school, family, Social Housing Services, liaison with YOS Liaison with SHS, Clinical Psychologist, EPS, PRS, School, Parents and foster carer,
therapist Reintegration programmes as a result of change in foster care placement and managed
move, Reintegration programmes as a result of changes in living arrangements and managed
move, Reintegration programmes as a result of move requested by parent following relationship
breakdown with school, referral made for support to Social Housing Services, parent declined
Family support provided Engagement of other agencies, parental support and advice, in school support, liaison with
PRS re reintegration Engagement of other agencies, parental support and advice, in school support
Impact
No FTE since managed move onto PRS, Fully engaged in provision which contributed to young person avoiding a custodial sentence
PEX avoided child still living and educated within Monmouthshire FTE reduced, PEX avoided, placement supported, pupil still living in Monmouthshire Pupil still reluctant to engage in all aspects of provision, FTE reduced but still
attendance issues Pupil being successfully reintegrated to another mainstream school, therapist
engaged to work with pupil Successful managed move, pupil engaged in learning, stability in social care
placement Successful managed move, pupil engaged in learning, stability in home placement Successful change in schools, pupil engaged in learning, no need for other agencies Support for child, no further episodes of FTE since referral Child protection referrals acted upon, on going Social Housing Services involvement
with family still has some episodes of FTE, pupil being reintegrated to school Child protection referrals acted upon, on going Social Housing Services, still has
some episodes of FTE
In Summary
Enabled us to maintain 0 permanent exclusions 2009-2010 and so far 2010-2011
Impacted positively in 81.8% of cases re FTE Impacted positively in 63.6% attendance of pupils Stabilised attendance in 18.2% of pupils Impacted positively financially for both SHS and CYP
Directorates Impacted positively upon safeguarding and well
being of pupils
Issues
Data shows that primary intervention has been more effective than secondary
Some pupils despite all the support and guidance available will still refuse to engage as their behaviours are entrenched
Essential to have the engagement of the family to influence change
Some pupils have social issues which will require significantly longer periods of intervention to address underlying factors
Some pupils may need specialist SEBD provision at an early age
Need to be able to share recording of information on all agencies systems
Performance
2009-2010
0 Permanent Exclusions
Significant Reduction 1061 days FTE
6th in Wales
The Future
Role has proved itself successful in working across agencies
Discussions already taken place with SHS and YOS
Can it become part of core services?