necsas annual report seco 2004 annual conference november 17, 2004

26
Safety & Environmental Compliance Safety & Environmental Compliance Office Office (SECO) (SECO) NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004 Thanh Minh Trinh, P.E NECSAS Program Manager Rob Klawitter, C.S.P. NECSAS Contractor from E2M

Upload: cheng

Post on 25-Feb-2016

58 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004. Thanh Minh Trinh, P.E NECSAS Program Manager. Rob Klawitter, C.S.P. NECSAS Contractor from E2M. Where have we been? Trends Recent Development What to expect in FY05 Q & A. Where have we been?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

NECSAS Annual Report

SECO 2004 Annual ConferenceNovember 17, 2004

Thanh Minh Trinh, P.E

NECSAS Program Manager

Rob Klawitter, C.S.P.

NECSAS Contractor from E2M

Page 2: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

1. Where have we been?

2. Trends

3. Recent Development

4. What to expect in FY05

5. Q & A

Page 3: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Where have we been?1. Program launched in 1999.

2. Piloted in 2000 – Oklahoma and Alaska

3. 2001 marked the first year of rolling out the program

4. Tier 1 Assessments - 72 facilities to date.

5. Tier 2 Assessments – 38 Facilities (only 2 in FY04)

6. Numerous assistance site visits (e.g., before or after Tier 1).

7. Identified 925 findings total:

a) Closed – 605; b) In-progress of Closing – 237; c) Open - 83

Page 4: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Where have we been?

Page 5: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Trend: 2001 - 2004Comparison : Assessed Facilities

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

NWS NMAO OCAO NMFS NOS NESDIS OAR

Faci

litie

s

Page 6: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Trend: 2001 - 2004Comparison: Total Findings by Line Office

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

NWS NMAO OCAO NMFS NOS NESDIS OAR

Find

ings

Page 7: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Trend: 2001 - 2004

Comparison: Average Findings per LO Facility

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

NWS NMAO OCAO NMFS NOS NESDIS OAR NOAAAverage

Aver

age

Find

ings

per

Fac

ility

Page 8: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Page 9: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Trend: 2001 – 2004 NECSAS Summary

Year Zone Environmental Safety TotalFinding % Finding %

2001 CA, HI, GU 20 14% 120 86% 140

2002 TX, LA, FL 25 16% 135 84% 160

2003 DC, MD, CO, MO, AK, PA, NJ, SC

47 15% 277 85% 324

2004 (Draft)

IN, MI, IL, OH, WA, OR, MD, VA, NC

69 23% 232 77% 301

Net Overall 161 17% 764 83% 925

Page 10: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Trend: 2001 - 2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2001 2002 2003 2004

CLA

SS I

FIN

DIN

GS

SafetyEnv

Page 11: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Top 5 Finding Protocols - Safety

2001 2002 2003 2004 - DraftElectrical Safety Work Practices

Electrical Safety Work Practices

Electrical Safety Work Practices

Electrical Safety Work Practices

Walking/Working Surfaces

Means of Egress Fire Protection Walking/Working Surfaces

Means of Egress Fire Protection Means of Egress Fire Protection

Injuries/Illness Log

Occupational Noise Walking/Working Surfaces

Machinery/Machine

SafeguardingHazard Communication

Materials Handling Machinery/Machine

SafeguardingMeans of Egress

Trend: Evolution of Top Fives

Page 12: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Top 5 Finding Protocols – Environmental

2001 2002 2003 2004 - DraftHazardous Waste Mgmt

Petroleum, Oil, Lubricants Mgmt

Petroleum, Oil, Lubricants Mgmt

Petroleum, Oil, Lubricants Mgmt

Hazardous Materials Mgmt

Hazardous Waste Mgmt

Hazardous Waste Mgmt

Hazardous Waste Mgmt

Petroleum, Oil, Lubricants Mgmt

Storage Tank Mgmt Asbestos Mgmt Storage Tank Mgmt

Storage Tank Mgmt

Solid Waste Mgmt Solid Waste Mgmt Hazardous Materials Mgmt

Wastewater Mgmt

PCB Mgmt Water Quality Mgmt Wastewater Mgmt

Trend: Evolution of Top Fives

Page 13: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

1. Let’s look at the root cause of our findings.

2. We use the MERT system:

1. M – Management

2. E – External Force

3. R – Resource

4. T - Training

3. A program in its infancy (Development) stage could expect most root causes to fall within the Management Emphasis grouping.

4. As the program matures(or in the Implementation stage), the root cause trend should gradually shift toward Resource and Training

5. Ultimately, the program reaches “Sustainment” when all root causes are attributed to External Force.

Trend: NOAA's Shift to EMS and SEMS

Page 14: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

2001 NECSAS (CA/HI/GU)

Root Cause Breakdown

Resources11.1%

Management Emphasis

88.8%

Trend: Shifting to EMS & SEMS

Page 15: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

2002 NECSAS (TX, LA, FL)

Root Cause Breakdown

External3.6% Training

0.1%

Management Emphasis

71.5%

Resources24.8%

Trend: Shifting to EMS & SEMS

Page 16: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

2003 NECSAS (D.C. (HCHB), MD (SSMC), CO, MO, AK, PA, NJ, SC)

Root Cause Breakdown

Management Emphasis

37.6%

Resources54.1%

Training0.8%

External7.0%

Trend: Shifting to EMS & SEMS

Page 17: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Recent Developments1. NECSAS team met in May of 2004

2. Tier 2 rules and process were developed

3. Updated WHAM to address:1. Access, LOCAP comment, and changing finding status

4. WHAM web based and CD training for WHAM users

5. In the process of evaluating tablet PC to conduct assessments.

6. Tier 3 Questionnaires & VFA integration.

Page 18: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Recent Developments

Who will conduct Tier II’s? RECO/RSM

What type of QA process will be used if any?NECSAS PM/Contractor PM ensure proper naming of database/photos prior to upload. No other formal QA process prior to upload.

Who will upload to WHAM?NECSAS PM/Contractor PM

Will there be a review of findings on WHAM?Facility Manager and LECO will have 14-days to review Tier II findings following upload to WHAM

Track findings to closure? Yes. LECO, in conjunction with facility manager, will use existing LOCAP function.

Tier II Business Rule Discussion Points

Page 19: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Recent Developments

Tier II Business Rule Discussion Points - Continued

Definition of a repeat finding? Would Tier II finding be repeat if identified during a Tier I, and vise versa?

A previously identified finding is again identified during a subsequent Tier I or Tier II assessment. Assessor(s) will only use the previous assessment in evaluating the existence of a repeat finding.

Time frame for completion of Database and upload to WHAM following completion of site visit?

RECO/RSM Team has 30-business days to complete the development of Draft Tier II database.

Training on the process?NECSAS group recommended funding a three day training class by reducing the number of required Tier II assessment in FY 04. Training would be provided to all RECO/RSM’s and others (new LECO’s/CECO’s etc)

Page 20: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Recent Developments

Page 21: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Recent Developments

Quick

Review

Page 22: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Recent Developments

VFA Top Level Facility Summary Screen

Page 23: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

Recent Developments

Tier III Questionnaires

Safety & Environmental Compliance

Page 24: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

What to expect in FY05

FY 00/04/08…(I/V/IX...)

FY 01/05/09…(II/VI/X…)

FY 02/06/10…(III/VII/XI…)

FY 03/07/11…(IV/VIII/XII…)

DC/MD/VA3 CA8 AL/FL/GA4 AK10

IL/IN/OH5 CT/MA/RI1b LA/MS/TX6 CO

MI GU11 SC DE/NJ/PA2

NC HI11 MO/OK7

OR/WA9 ME/NH/VT1a

Perpetual Calendar

Page 25: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

What to expect in FY051. See attached spreadsheet

This list was emailed to all LECO, RECO, and RSM on 10/14/04.

2. Tier I Site Selection – Nominate your facilities. Our FY05 NOAA target is 25 to 30 facilities.

3. Tier II Site Selection – Coordination between LECO and RECO/RSM.

4. Tier II will not take place until after the RECO/RSM have received training.

5. Tier III questionnaires.

Page 26: NECSAS Annual Report SECO 2004 Annual Conference November 17, 2004

Safety & Environmental Compliance OfficeSafety & Environmental Compliance Office(SECO)(SECO)

QUESTIONS?