nehrp_2_97
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
1/45
66
Seismic Response Coefficient
)/(/1.0 1
1
IRTS
IRSCIS DDS
sD =
Seismic Design Category E and F:
)/(//5.0 11
IRTS
IRSC
IRS DDS
s =
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
2/45
67
Response Modification Factor, R
Basis:
Ductility Damping System Redundancy
Table 5.2.2
Special Moment Resisting Frame - Steel (SMRF) 8.0
Special Moment Resisting Frame - Reinforced Conc. (SMRF) 8.0
Ordinary Reinforced Shear Walls (ORSW) 5.5Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame Steel (OMRFS) 4.0
Ordinary Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames (ORCMF) 3.0
Ordinary Plain Masonry Shear Walls (OPMSW) 1.5
)/(/1
IRT
S
IR
SC DDS
s =
R R
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
3/45
68
Response Modification Factor, R
Seismic Reponse Coefficient
0.0000
0.1000
0.2000
0.3000
0.4000
0.5000
0.6000
0.7000
0.8000
0.9000
1.0000
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
Period, Seconds
Seis
micResponseCoefficient,Cs
Elastic Spectrum
OPMSW (R=1.5)
ORCMF (R=3.0)
OMRFS (R=4)ORSW (R=5.5)
SMRF (R=8)
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
4/45
69
Structural Framing Systems
Moment Resisting Frame.A structural system with anessentially complete space frame provides support forgravity loads. Moment Resisting frames provide resistanceto lateral load primarily by flexural action of members.
Bearing Wall System.A structural system without a complete vertical load-carryingspace frame. Bearing walls or bracing systems provide supportfor all or most gravity loads. Resistance to lateral load isprovided by shear walls or braced frames.
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
5/45
70
Structural Framing Systems
Dual System
A structural system with the following features:
An essentially complete space frame which provides support
for gravity loads, Resistance to lateral load is provided by a especially
detailed moment-resisting frame (steel or concrete) which iscapable of resisting at least 25% of base shear.
The two system shall be designed to resist the total lateralload in proportion to their relative rigidities.
Building Frame SystemA structural system an essentially complete space frame providing
support for gravity loads. Resistance to lateral load isprovided by shear walls or braced frames.
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
6/45
71
Fundamental Period, T
Method of calculation
Rayleigh
others
As T, Fundamental period ofvibration, increases, Csandtherefore, base shear, V, decreases
Design spectrum is constant at lowT
)/(/1
IRT
S
IR
SC DDS
s =
T
T
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
7/45
72
Fundamental Period, T
)/(/1
IRT
S
IR
SC DDS
s =
T
CT = 0.035 for steel MRFCT = 0.030 for concrete MRF
CT = 0.030 for steel EBF
CT = 0.020 for other building systems
4/3
nTa hCT = 5.3.2.1-4
12 stories and10 ft story heightNTa 1.0=
5.3.3.1-2
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
8/45
73
Measured Periods
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
9/45
74
Fundamental Period, T
)/(/1
IRT
S
IR
SC DDS
s =
T If Tis calculated, Tused
to determine Cs is limitedby
auTCT
Design Spectral
Response Acceleration at 1 second, SD1Cu
0.40.3
0.2
0.150.1
0.05
1.21.3
1.4
1.51.7
1.7
Table 5.3.3
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
10/45
75
Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces
Fx
V
hx
VCF vxx=
==
n
i
k
ii
k
xx
vx
hw
hwC
1
T K
0.5 1.0
2.5 2.0Interpolate
5.3.4-1
5.3.4-2
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
11/45
Example
Determine the NEHRP-97design seismic forces for a
nine-story ductile momentresisting steel-frameoffice building located inMemphis, Tennessee onSoil Site Class D. Thestory heights are all 13 ft;the plan area is 100 ft by170 ft. The total dead loadis 100 lb/ft2 at all levels.
170ft
100
ft
9
@ 13
ft
Elevation
Plan
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
12/45
Example (contd)
40.1=SS
42.0=D
S
Table 4.1.2.4a 0.1=a
Table 4.1.2.4b 6.1=V
93.0)4.1(
3
2
3
2=== MSDS SS
45.0)67.0(3
2
3
211
=== MD
SS
4.14.10.1 === SaMS
SS
67.042.06.111 === SS vM
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
13/45
R = 8 Special Steel Moment Resisting Frame
SecondshT na 25.1)117(035.0)(035.04/34/3
===Equation 5.3.3.1-1
Seismic Design Category
D from Tables 4.2.1a and 4.2.1b
)/(/1
IRT
S
IR
SC DDS
s =
05625.0)25.1/8(25.1
45.0093.0
25.1/8
93.0===
sC
ISISC
DS
/1.0
1 =
05625.025.145.01.0 ==S
C
05625.0=S
CTherefore,
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
14/45
79
Example (contd)
kipsVCvxx
861)300,15(05625.0 ===
=
=
n
i
k
ii
k
xx
vx
hw
hwC
1
5.3.4-1
5.3.4-2
375.15.05.2
50.025.10.10.1 =
+=k
T K
0.5 1.02.5 2.0 Interpolate
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
15/45
80
Example (contd)
Level h_x W_x hx^1.375 w_i*h-i Cvx Fx Vx Mx
9 117 1700 697.8 1186327.2 0.233 200.2 200.2 2603
8 104 1700 593.5 1008950.3 0.198 170.3 370.5 7419
7 91 1700 493.9 839712.9 0.165 141.7 512.2 14078
6 78 1700 399.6 679327.2 0.133 114.6 626.9 22227
5 65 1700 311.0 528694.5 0.104 89.2 716.1 31536
4 52 1700 228.8 389003.5 0.076 65.7 781.7 41698
3 39 1700 154.1 261916.4 0.051 44.2 825.9 52435
2 26 1700 88.2 149981.4 0.029 25.3 851.2 63501
1 13 1700 34.0 57825.7 0.011 9.8 861.0 74694
ummation 15300 3001.0 5101739.1 1.000 861.0
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
16/45
81
Category Procedure
A N.A.B Neglect -
Seismic forces may be applied separately
in each of two orthogonal directions.C 5.2.6.3.1
Apply in critical direction
D 5.2.6.4.1 or
100% x-direction 30% y-direction
E,F 100% y-direction 30% x-direction
Orthogonal Loads
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
17/45
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
18/45
83
Combination of Load Effects 5.2.7
DSQE DSE 2.0=
The effect of seismic load Edefined below as for loadcombinations in which the effects of gravity loads and seismicloads are additive (+) or for load combinations in which theeffects of gravity counteract seismic load (-)
The effects on the structure and its components due to gravityloads and seismic forces shall be combined in accordance with the
factored load combinations as presented in ASCE 7-95 except thatthe effect of seismic loads, E, shall be defined as:
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
19/45
84
Combination of Load Effects 5.2.7
DSQE DSE 2.0=
E = the effect of horizontal andvertical earthquake induced forces,
SDS = the design spectral response accelerationat short periods,
D = the effect of dead load,
QE = the effect of horizontal seismic forces, and = the reliability factor.
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
20/45
85
Reliability Factor,
Added to encourage redundancy in lateral load
resisting systems.
This added redundancy will provide multiple load
paths in structure prior to formation of failuremechanism
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
21/45
86
Reliability Factor,
Seismic Categories A, B, and C
Seismic Category D
0.1=
xAr
xmax
202 =
5.2.4
5.10.1
Ax = the floor in square feet of the diaphragmlevel immediately above the story.
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
22/45
87
rmax
rmax= the ratio of story shear resisted by the singleelement carrying the most shear force in the storyto the total story shear, for a given direction ofloading.
rmax= maximum element shear / story shear
For moment frames, maximum element shear is the summationof the shear in any two adjacent columns in the plane of a
moment frame. If a column is common to two bays withmoment resisting connections on opposite sides at the levelunder consideration, 70% of the shear in the common columnis used.
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
23/45
88
rmax
For braced frames, the value of rmax is equal to thelateral force component in the most heavily loadedbrace element divided by the story shear.
For shear walls, maximum element shear is equal to
te maximum value of the the product of the wallshear multiplied by 10/lw, where lw is the wall lengthin feet.
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
24/45
89
Example - Braced Frame
5.0max
=x
r
For a braced frame, the element-story shear ratio is determinedas shown below.
Assuming that each brace resists the seismic shear equally,the maximum element-story shear ratio is:
Brace
30
60
V/2 V/2
0.160305.0
202 =
=
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
25/45
90
Example
30
60
V/6
V/6V/3
V/3
33.0max
=x
r
5.0603033.0
202 =
=
Special MomentResisting Frame
Use 1.0
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
26/45
91
Example
100
Shear Wall
200
V/2
V/2
05.0100/5/105.0max === wlr x
mimmum1
83.22
20010005.0
202
=
=
=
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
27/45
92
15
15
Load Combination - Ultimate Strength Design
75
2010 k
62.5 k
154.6 k
154.6 k
16.17 k 32.34 k 32.34 k 16.17 k
Dead
LoadLiveLoad
SeismicLoad
Determine the maximum and minimumultimate strength design loads acting onthe column footings of the special MRF
shown here. Frames are 25 feet oncenter, the floor live load is 125 lb/ft2
and the roof live load is 20 lb/ft2.Neglect any reduction of live load due tosupported area. Use SDs = 1.0.
21.56 k
10.78 k
32.34 k
33.0)56.213/(56.21max
==x
r
0.1
44.0
752033.0
202
=
=
=
use
DSQE DSE 2.0=
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
28/45
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
29/45
94
Load Combination - Ultimate Strength DesignContd
= 2/)( DxWD
The force in one column due tothe effects of dead load is
WDx = dead load at level x
6.154
2/)2.1542(
=
=D
kips
= 2/)( LxWL
The force in one column due tothe effects superimposed floor load
WLx = floor live load at level x
25.31
2/)5.62(
=
=L
kips
2/rr WL =
The force in one column due tothe effects superimposed roof load
Wr = roof live load
52/)10( ==rL kips
10 k
62.5 k
154.6 k
154.6 k
Dead
Load
Live
Load
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
30/45
95
Load Combinations
8.67)9.304.400.1(0.1)6.154(9.0
)2.0(0.19.00.19.0.6
288)25.31(0.1)9.304.400.1(0.1)6.154(2.1
0.1)2.0(0.12.10.12.1.5
2.138)5(5.0)25.31(6.1)6.154(2.1
5.06.12.1.2
1
=++=
=+++
+++=++
=++
++
DSQDED
LDSQDLfED
LLD
DSE
DSE
r
ASCE7-95, Sect 2.3.2
kips
kips
kips
Governs
Governs
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
31/45
96
Inelastic Force-Deformation Curve
0
dR
R
dC
YV
SV
EV
Elastic Response of Structure
Successive
Yield Hinges
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
32/45
97
Torsion
)05.0( DVeVTtat
+=+=
For category C, D, E, and F with Type 1 TorsionalIrregularities:
taxt
T +=
3.0Aavg
x
=
2
max
2.1
Mt= Torsional MomentMta= Accidental Torsional Momentmax= Maximum Displacement at level xavg= Average of displ at extreme pts of
the structure at level x
5.3.5.3
5.3.5.3
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
33/45
98
Torsion
+
=2Rd
deV
RR
VRV Tx
CA
x
AL
Base shear of the moment frame
Rigidity of frames are designated by R.
For this figureRD =RB andRA =RC
Torsion Vx eTis resisted by the rigidity of all frames
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
34/45
99
Overturning
Top
10floors
10
floors
0.1=
0.1=
8.0=
8.0=
= =n
xixiix hhFM )( 5.3.6
Foundationuse =0.75 for all floors
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
35/45
100
Reason for
NEHRP 97 - Commentary - Section 5.3.6
The distribution of design story shears over height computed from the lateral forcesis intended to provide an envelope since the shear in all stories do not attain theirmaximum simultaneously. Thus, the overturning moments computed statistically fromthe envelope of story shears will be overestimated.
It is intended that the design shear envelope to be conservative. If the shear in aspecific story is close to the exact value, the shears in almost all other stories almostnecessarily overestimated. Hence, the overturning moments statically consistent withthe design story shears will be overestimated.
Under the action of overturning moments, one edge of the foundation may lift from
the ground for short duration of time. Such behavior leads to substantial reduction inseismic forces, and consequently, in the overturning moment.
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
36/45
101
Overturning
Intended ductile responseWhy ductile detailing if you can use it?
Possible brittle failure
Rocking Response:Large displacements
Low energy dissipationCompatibility problems with
the rest of the structure
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
37/45
102
Rayleighs Method for Determining Period
=
=
=n
iii
i
n
ii
Fg
wT
1
2
12
F1
F2
F3
Since the deflection has been determined for the preliminary design, a
more accurate T may be computed using Rayleigh's method as:
where:
n = number of floors
Wi = weight of each floor (kips)di = deflection of each floor relative
to base of structure
g = 32.2 ft/sec2
Fi = lateral force at each level (kips)
auTCT
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
38/45
103
Drift
xBxT =
IC xed
x =
Cd = Deflection Modification Factor
xe = Deflection determined by an elastic analysis
EBF (Mom. Resisting Connections, at columns away from Links) 4Ordinary Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls 4
Special Masonry Moment Frames 5Special Moment Resisting Frame - Steel 5 1/2Special Moment Resisting Frame - Reinforced Conc. 5 1/2Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame Steel 3 1/2
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
39/45
104
Drift
Verify that building elements can accommodate
interstory drift,
Verify that control joints and clearances to
adjacent structures can accommodate totaldisplacement,
Consider P-Delta if needed.
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
40/45
105
Allowable Story Drift
Table 5.2.8
If Trather thanTa is used in calculating x, the limit of the T < CuTa doesnot apply. This implies that deflection is not as critical as strength.
)/(/
1
IRT
S
IR
SC DDS
s =
T auTCT N.A.
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
41/45
106
Example (contd)
Allowable interstory displacements: Seismic Use
Group II
inhsxa
12.3)1213(020.0020.0 ===
xe
xexed
x I
C
4.425.1
5.5
=
==
5.5=d
C
in709.04.4
12.3=
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
42/45
107
P-Delta Effects
if the stability coefficient, is greater than max, thestructure will be unstable
If 10.0 neglect
25.05.0
max =
dC
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
43/45
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
44/45
109
P-Delta Effects
Ifmax
10.0
-
8/9/2019 NEHRP_2_97
45/45
Steps in Design
Select Preliminary Members
Calculate weight of structure, W
Calculate total seismic base shear, V, utilizing accelerationresponse spectrum, W and T
Distribute base shear to structure as a series of static forces andperform a stress analysis and determine drift
Check resulting stresses, displacements, and stability
Satisfy specific special design and detailing requirements based onseismic performance category
Overturning demand is based on lateral loads that are less thanultimate of lateral load resisting system