nep
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
THE MYTH
“FINANCIAL GLOBALIZATION HAS ONLY PROMOTED SPECULATION
AND RUIN”
TO BREAK THIS, HERE COMES
MYTH BREAKERS
Globalization? Global impact? Why?
Answer: Princess Diana's death. Question: How come? Question: What is the truest definition
of Globalization? Answer: An English princess, with an Egyptian lover, crashes in a French tunnel, driving a German car, with a Dutch engine, driven by a Belgian who was drunk, on Scottish whisky, followed closely by Italian
Photographers, on Japanese motorcycles;
CHECK THIS OUT
treated by an American doctor, using Brazilian medicines. This is being told by a British, using Bill Gates' technology, and you're seeing it through a Japanese
multimedia projector, that use Taiwanese chips, and a Korean lens, assembled by Bangladeshi workers, in a Singapore plant, This is being told in front of Professors, Educated in USA, UK, Japan, France, &
India That, my friends, is Globalization
BE READY TO WITNESS THE POWEROF --------------------
GL
OB
AL
IZA
TIO
N
Comparative Growth Ratesof Developing Economies
Average Annual Rates 1960-88
CountryIndustrial
ProductionGDP
1960-1980 1980-1988 1960-1980 1980-1988
South Korea 15.2 12.6 8.8 10.1
Taiwan 12.8 7.2 9.6 7.4
Singapore 12.1 4.5 9.2 6.9
Hong Kong 10.3 7.5 9.9 7.4
Thailand 10.3 6.6 7.4 6.5
Indonesia 8.9 5.1 5.9 5.7
Pakistan 8.0 7.2 4.4 6.3
Malaysia 9.6* 6.1 7.9* 4.6
India 4.6 7.6 3.5 5.4
Bangladesh 6.1 4.9 5.8* 3.5
Sri Lanka 5.3 4.4 5.2 3.9
Mayanmar 4.2 7.3* 3.5 3.3*
* - 1970-1980
Source: The Economist May 4, 1991, Survey page 7
Type Regulation License?
Consumer GoodsInessential
Banned
Consumer GoodsEssential (Medicines)
Permitted
Capital GoodsRestricted
PermittedCertification of Being Essential
Indigenous Angle ClearanceLicense
Capital GoodsOpen General License
Permitted No License Required
Intermediate GoodsBanned
Intermediate GoodsRestricted
License Required
Intermediate GoodsLimited Permissible
License Required
Intermediate GoodsOpen General License
No License Required
•excessive over-staffing •under utilization of capacity •excessive inventories •poor management of materials •obsolete technology •inadequate maintenance •wrong selection of products
In combination with the industrial-licensing regime [the small company policy] has given India the worst of both worlds: too many small and inefficient companies at the bottom, too many large and monopolistic ones at the top.
A poor country can’t afford to carry on billing the poorest people for its inefficiency and call itself socialist.
Nominal Tariff Rates of Various CountriesAs Percentage of Value, 1985
CountryIntermedi
ateGoods
CapitalGoods
ConsumerGoods
ManufacturingGoods
Hungary 14.2 15.0 22.6 20.9
Yugoslavia 18.0 20.7 20.0 19.0
Argentina 21.2 25.0 21.9 22.9
Morocco 21.6 18.1 43.0 27.3
Philippines 21.8 24.5 39.0 28.0
Mexico 25.5 23.5 32.2 24.7
Thailand 27.8 24.8 8.5 33.6
Turkey 29.4 54.9 55.3 37.1
Pakistan 75.0 73.8 127.3 89.8
China 78.9 62.5 130.7 91.2
Bangladesh 97.9 80.5 116.1 100.8
India 146.4 107.3 140.9 137.7Source: World Bank, cited in The Economist May 4, 1991, Survey page 9
INDIA RANKED 13TH IN GLOBAL LIST OF FDI
• WHILE THE WESTERN ECONOMIES STRUGGLED INDIA BENEFITTED FROM THEIR SHORTFALLS.
In past 27 years BSE Sensex has given about 18% returns
Past Performance (BSE Sensex)
Year Sensex Investment Rs.
1979 100 1,00,0000
2006 10,000 1,00,00,000
This is in spite of …
• Two wars• At least three major financial
scandals• Assassination of 2 prime
ministers
• At least 3 recessionary periods
• 10 different governments and• An unfair share of natural
disasters
Years YEAR END SENSEX level 1 year 3 years 5 years 7 years 10 years 15 years
0 31-Mar-79 100.00
1 31-Mar-80 128.57 28.57%
2 31-Mar-81 173.44 34.90%
3 31-Mar-82 217.71 25.52% 29.61%
4 31-Mar-83 211.51 -2.85% 18.05%
5 31-Mar-84 245.33 15.99% 12.25% 19.66%
6 31-Mar-85 353.86 44.24% 17.58% 22.44%
7 31-Mar-86 574.11 62.24% 39.49% 27.05% 28.36%
8 31-Mar-87 510.36 -11.10% 27.66% 18.58% 21.77%
9 31-Mar-88 398.37 -21.94% 4.03% 13.50% 12.61%
10 31-Mar-89 713.60 79.13% 7.52% 23.81% 18.48% 21.72%
11 31-Mar-90 781.05 9.45% 15.24% 17.16% 20.52% 19.77%
12 31-Mar-91 1167.97 49.54% 43.12% 15.26% 24.97% 21.01%
13 31-Mar-92 4285.00 266.88% 81.76% 53.04% 42.80% 34.71%
14 31-Mar-93 2280.52 -46.78% 42.93% 41.76% 21.78% 26.84%
15 31-Mar-94 3778.99 65.71% 47.90% 39.57% 33.11% 31.45% 27.40%
16 31-Mar-95 3260.96 -13.71% -8.70% 33.09% 35.03% 24.87% 24.05%
17 31-Mar-96 3366.61 3.24% 13.86% 23.58% 24.81% 19.35% 21.86%
18 31-Mar-97 3360.89 -0.17% -3.83% -4.74% 23.18% 20.74% 20.02%
19 31-Mar-98 3892.75 15.82% 6.08% 11.29% 18.77% 25.60% 21.43%
20 31-Mar-99 3739.96 -3.92% 3.57% -0.21% -1.92% 18.02% 19.92%
21 31-Mar-00 5001.28 33.73% 14.17% 8.93% 11.87% 20.40% 19.31%
22 31-Mar-01 3604.38 -27.93% -2.53% 1.37% -0.67% 11.93% 13.03%
22 31-Mar-02 3469.35 -3.75% -2.47% 0.64% 0.89% -2.09% 13.63%
22 31-Mar-03 3048.72 -12.12% -15.21% -4.77% -1.41% 2.95% 14.53%
23 31-Mar-04 5590.60 83.38% 15.76% 8.37% 7.54% 3.99% 14.71%
24 31-Mar-05 6492.82 16.14% 23.23% 5.36% 7.58% 7.13% 15.16%
25 31-Mar-06 11279.96 73.73% 54.67% 25.63% 17.08% 12.85% 16.32%
28.29% 19.43% 17.41% 17.48% 17.85% 18.57%
10/27 5/25 3/23 3/21 1/18 0/13Probability of Loss
PERFORMANCE OF BSE SENSITIVITY INDEX - Equities not risky in long run
Rolling Returns - Growth
Average Returns
18.57%
0 / 13
Equities:Not Risky in Long Run
Example Period Sensex Growth Sensex Earning
31 Mar 1991 1167.97 59.53
31 Mar 2006 11279.96 539.20
% growth (CAGR) 16.32% 15.82%
Period Sensex Growth Sensex Earning
31 Mar 2000 5001.28 231.54
31 Mar 2006 11279.96 539.20
% growth (CAGR) 14.52% 15.13%
ADVANTAGES OF FDI
• IMPROVED CAPITAL FLOW.• INCREASED CAPITAL FLOW.• MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE.• ACCESS TO INTERNATIONAL
MARKETS.
FDI IN MAJOR SECTORS IN INDIA
• FINANCIAL SECTOR.• INSURANCE AND
TELECOMMUNICATION.• HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM.• PHARMASEUTICALS.• SOFTWARE AND I.T.
INDIA RANKS HIGH IN FII PRIORITY LIST
• INDIAN ECONOMY IS LESS EXPORT-ORIENTED AND THIS PLACES IT IN A STRONGER POSITION THAN CHINA