Want More Details on How EMCFared Against NetBackup?

FINDINGS:NETBACKUP IS 1.7X FASTER THAN COMPETITOR “E”WHEN PERFORMING A GRANULAR RECOVERY BACKUP.

RESULTS FOR: GRANULAR RECOVERY

9:0

0

7:0

0

8:0

0

6:0

0

5:0

0

4:0

0

3:0

0

2:0

0

1:0

0

0:0

0

4:46

8:30

NetBackup enables granular recovery through a single-pass backup. EMC requires multiple steps to enable granular recovery.

1X 2X 1.7X

0

12

3

45

78

9

1011

6

4:46

8 : 30

NetBackup

FASTER

SPEED TEST

Principled Technologies’ benchmark results show that in a growing enterprise data center using VMware, NetBackup will scale significantly better than EMC.

NetBackup Competitor “E”RESULTS

HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP & RECOVERY

ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS

GRANULAR RECOVERY

“NetBackup IS THE MOSTSCALABLE BACKUP &

RECOVERY SOLUTION”

RESULTS FOR: ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS

16:00

18:00

14:00

12:00

10:00

8:00

6:00

4:00

2:00

0:00

5:04 5:176:30

8:28

100 VMs 200 VMs 500 VMs 1,000 VMs

TOTA

L TI

ME

TO

CO

MPL

ETE

BA

CKU

P (M

inut

es:S

econ

ds)

Snapshots can be used to create quicker Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and more aggressive Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). In less than 9 minutes NetBackup’s snapshot technology backed up 1,000 Virtual Machines. NetBackup is a leader in snapshot technology, while Competitor "E" does not support array-based snapshot integration for VMware workloads.

16:00

18:00

14:00

12:00

10:00

8:00

6:00

4:00

2:00

0:00

5:04 5:176:30

8:28

100 VMs 200 VMs 500 VMs 1,000 VMs

TOTA

L TI

ME

TO

CO

MPL

ETE

bac

kup

(Min

utes

:Sec

onds

)

Snapshots can be used to create quicker Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and more aggressive Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). In less than 9 minutes NetBackup’s snapshot technology backed up 1,000 Virtual Machines. NetBackup is a leader in snapshot technology, while Competitor "E" does not support array-based snapshot integration for VMware workloads.

FINDINGS:NETBACKUP REQUIRES LESS THAN 9 MINUTES TO BACK UP 1,000 VMS USING ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS.

COMPETITOR “E” DOES NOT SUPPORTARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS.

FINDINGS:NETBACKUP IS 3X FASTER THAN COMPETITOR “E”WHEN BACKING UP 1,000 VMS.

SPEED

RESULTS FOR: HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP

8:00

9:00

7:00

6:00

5:00

4:00

3:00

2:00

1:00

0:00

0:25

2:18

0:431:11

2:513:58

8:36NetBackup

EMC

5:22

100 VMs 200 VMs 400 VMs 1,000 VMs

Lower times are better when it comes to backup windows. NetBackup saves time, especially in large scale environments. As the environment scaled from 100 to 200, 400 and then 1,000 virtual machines, there were dramatic increases in the time required by EMC to perform the backups.

TOTA

L TI

ME

TO

CO

MPL

ETE

BA

CKU

P (H

ours

:Min

utes

)

Zoom & Rotate

1X 2X 3X

9:0

0

7:0

0

8:0

0

6:0

0

5:0

0

4:0

0

3:0

0

2:0

0

1:0

0

0:0

0

1,000VMs

2:51

8:36

1X 2X 3X

FOR HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP SPEED TEST

0

1 2

3

45

78

9

1011

6

2:51

8:36

3XFASTER

NetBackup

RESULTS

VMware Virtual Machines

Competitor “E”NetBackup

WHAT IS THE MOSTSCALABLE SOLUTION?

T E S T S P E R F O R M E D B YAn industry leader and expert in technology benchmark testingALL TESTS BASED ON:• Enterprise Backup and Recovery Solutions• Scaling from 100 to 1,000 VMware VMs• Real-world Situations and Workloads

NetBackup COMPETITOR “E”

Principled®Technologies

VIRTUAL MACHINE GROWTHDATA GROWTH

=X

LARGESCALEPROBLEM

BACKUP & RECOVERYSCALABILITY BENCHMARK

SCALE IN A VIRTUAL WORLD

Part# 21352227

© 2015 Veritas Technologies Corporation. All rights reserved. Veritas and the Veritas Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Veritas Technologies Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. And other countries. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

Updated 06/15

Download the Full Report Now

go.veritas.com/nbu-vs-e