neutron radiation and dosimetry vylet
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
1/28
Neutron Irradiations and
Dosimetry
Vashek Vylet, PhD
Duke University Medical Center
Center for Medical Countermeasures Against Radiation
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
2/28
Goal: Introduce you to
Challenges in Neutron Dosimetry
How we can determine dosimetricquantities of interest
Neutron irradiations available at Duke
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
3/28
Facts and Challenges
Neutrons ionize indirectly, via secondary
charged particles: protons and heavier cp
Neutron energies span many decades
Their biological effects vary greatly withenergy
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
4/28
10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
En / eV
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
En
*
E(En
)/cm-2
10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
En / eV
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
En
*E
(En
)/c
m-2
Soft Reactor Spectrum
Hard Reactor Spectrum
252Cf-Bare
D2
0 Moderated 252Cf
Example of Neutron Spectra
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
5/28
Quantities (quick recap) Fluence: = dN/da [cm-2] ; dNis number of
particles impinging on a sphere around point ofinterest, with great-circle area da (particles/cm2)
Exposure X [Roentgen] Obsolete, not forneutrons; replaced by Kerma in air
Kerma K= dtr/dm[Gy=J.kg-1] or [rad] wheretr is energy tranferred by indirectly ionizingradiation (neutrons, )
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
6/28
Quantities Absorbed Dose D = d/dm[Gy= J.kg-1 =
100 rad] where is energy imparted (to a smallvolume of mass dm)
Dose Equivalent H = D.Q [Sv=J.kg-1]where Q=f(LET)is the quality factor
Linear Energy Transfer: LET[keV.m-1] howdensely is energy imparted; much higher forprotons than electrons
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
7/28
N vs : Biological effects
For same energy deposited, neutrons
much more effective (~10x) in damagingcells
Neutron secondaries: high LET (mostly p+
) Photon products: low LET (e- and e+)
1 MeV e- range in H2O: 4.3 mm
1 MeV p+ range in H2O: 0.023 mm
Ionization density much higher for p+
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
8/28
Quantities
Equivalent Dose HT=wRDR [Sv=J.kg-1]
Effective Dose E=wTHT [Sv=J.kg-1
]
Dose-Equivalent Index HI[Sv=J.kg-1] i.e. max. Dose-Equivalent in an
ICRU tissue sphere (30 cm diameter).
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
9/28
Quantities Fluence, Abs. Dose and Kerma are purely
physical = measurable quantities
H, HT
, E, EDE must be estimated orcalculated from measured (E), D(LET),
Measurable (not really) quantity: AmbientDose Equivalent (similar to Dose-EquivalentIndex in 30 cm sphere)
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
10/28
Underground Quantity Definitions
Exposure is a quantity that everybody can
measure, but nobody wants
Dose equivalent is a quantity that everybodywants, but nobody can measure
Ambient Dose Equivalent The dose equivalentreceived by a 30-cm diameter spherical man.ifhe werent there
Loosely after J. McDonald
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
11/28
Cant measure H,
so measure ()And use this
conversion factor
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
12/28
Conversion Factors Calculated for humans (not mice)
using Monte-Carlo codes andincreasingly complex phantoms
VIP-Man, based on theVisible Human Project
MIRD Phantoms
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
13/28
Triangle Universities Nuclear Lab
Two areas for neutron irradiations in TUNL
N
N
NTOF
SNSA
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
14/28
TUNL
Charge particle beams at TUNL
less than 500 eVEnergy spread
50 nAHeavy ions
500 nA3He and 4He2 Apolarized protons and deuterons
2 A pulsed and 5 A dc (d)unpolarized protons and deuterons
Maximum current on target
p, d, 3He, 4He and heavier ions (c)Particle types
DC to 2.5 MHz with 1.5 ns wide pulses (b)Beam pulse repetition rate
1.5 to 19.0 MeV (a)Nominal energy range
Performance SpecificationsParameter
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
15/28
Neutron production at TUNL
Reactions: 2H(d,n)3He, 3H(p,n)3He,7Li(p,n)7Be
High-flux yield from protons or deuterons
on
9
Be: Dose-equivalent rates from5 micro-A deuterons on 9-Be target
En [MeV] Sv/h rem/h
0.5 1.13 112.73.2 7.13 713.3
8 2.84 283.8
14 0.12 12.3
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
16/28
Neutron production at TUNL
Shielded Neutron Source Deuterium gas target
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
17/28
TUNL Beam profile at Shielded Neutron Source
Area with circular collimator
Position (cm)
Horizontal
Vertical
Relative
Neutron
Flux
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
18/28
Dosimetry Goals at TUNL Measure neutron fluence and its energy
distribution (E)
Establish the photon contamination ofneutron beams: DG
Measure (and calculate) distribution ofdose as a function of LET.
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
19/28
Neutron Beam Characterization Time-Of-Flight measurements for energy
Long-counter for fluence
Bonner spheres for fluence and energy
Ionization Chambers for tissue Kerma TEPC for Dose as function of LET (micro-
dosimetry)
Monte Carlo calculations for specificphantom: spatial distribution of D(LET)
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
20/28
Long Counter Secondary standard for neutron fluence
measurements
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
21/28
Duke Bonner Spheres
30.48
PAPortable
MCAHV
A
25.420.32
14.28 cm
He-3counter
12.7x12.7cmscintillator (C11)
Measurements of primary and scattered
neutron spectra in room using spectra
unfolding technique
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
22/28
Twin Ionization Chambers Tissue-equivalent and graphite
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
23/28
Twin Chamber Technique There are no pure neutron fields, photon
(gamma) always present: Dtot = DN + DG
Goal: separate DN and DG using twoionization chambers (IC):
Tissue-equivalent IC (T): equally sensitive to
N and G Carbon IC (U): very low sensitivity to N
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
24/28
Twin Chamber Technique Response of TE IC:
Response of graphite IC:
kT, hT sensitivity of TE IC to N and G, resp. kU, hU sensitivity of graphite IC to N and G,
respectively (formalism of AAPM Report No. 7, Protocol forNeutron Beam Dosimetry)
U U N U G R k D h D= +
T T N T G
R k D h D= +
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
25/28
Twin Chamber Technique Then DN and DG can be easily obtained from
measured RT and RU:
U T T U U U U T N G
U T T U U T T U
h R h R k R k RD D
h k h k h k h k
= =
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
26/28
TEPC Tissue-equivalent Proportional Counter:
measures Dose as function of LET
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
27/28
Monte Carlo Calculations Predict contribution of scatter in experiment
Calculate energy deposition patterns ingreat detail, including spatial and energy
distributions of secondary charged particlesin specific small animal phantoms
Establish conversion fluence-to-dosefactors for mice or other small animals
-
8/3/2019 Neutron Radiation and Dosimetry Vylet
28/28
Suitable voxel-based phantoms maybe developed using data from micro-CT and NMR, or possibly importedfrom computer models developed forother purposes (Duke, ORNL).
MONTE CARLO