new agents on the horizon: implications for phase i, ii & iii trials dna repair and parp...
TRANSCRIPT
NEW AGENTS ON THE HORIZON: IMPLICATIONS FOR PHASE I, II & III TRIALSDNA Repair and PARP inhibitorsCarol Aghajanian, Nicoletta Colombo & Amit OzaAcknowledgements: Stan Kaye and AZ for slides
Amit M. OzaProfessor of Medicine,
Princess Margaret Hospital,University of Toronto
Co-Chair Gynecology, NCIC CTG
Base excision
repair
Types of DNA damage and repair
Type of damage:
Bulky adducts
Insertions& deletions
O6-alkylguanine
Repairpathway:
Nucleotide-excision
repair
Mismatch repair
Directreversal
Repairenzymes:
Double-strandbreaks(DSBs)
Single-strand breaks(SSBs)
Poly ADP
Ribose Polymer
ase
Recombinationalrepair
ATM DNA-PK
HR NHEJ
XP, poly-
merases
MSH2,MLH1
AGT
BRCA
PARP-1 is a key enzyme involved in the repair of single-strand DNA breaks
PAR chains are degraded via PARG
RepairedDNA
PARPDNA damage
Binds directly to SSBs
Repair enzymes
PAR
Nicotinamide+pADPr
NAD+
Once bound to damaged DNA, PARP modifies itself producing large branched chains of PAR
Inhibiting PARP-1 increases double-strand DNA damage
PARP
Inhibition of PARP-1 prevents recruitment of repair factors to repair SSB
XRCC1
LigIII
PNK 1
pol β
Replication (S-phase)
DNA DSB
DNA SSB
Cellsurvival
Normal cell
Deficient HR pathway – DSB not repaired
Selective effect of PARP-1 inhibition on cancer cells with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
DSB repaired
effectively via HR
pathway
DSB in DNA
Cancer cell death
BRCA-deficient cancer cell
Lethality
Tumour Selective Synthetic Lethality
Error prone repairGenomic instabilityCell death
DNA DAMAGE DNA DAMAGE
HR deficient e.g. BRCA1/2-/-
HR NHEJ SSA BER NER etc HR NHEJ SSA BER NER etcx xx
PARPi PARPi
Normal or heterozygotefor HR defect
TotalPlatinum sensitive
Platinum resistant
Platinum refractor
y
No. of evaluable patients
46 10 25 11
Responders by RECIST 13 (28%) 5 (50%) 8 (32%) 0 (0%)
Responders by GCIG CA125
18 (39%) 8 (80%) 8 (32%) 2 (18%)
Responders by either RECIST or GCIG criteria
21 (46%) 8 (80%) 11 (44%) 2 (18%)
SD (> 4 cycles) 9 (15%) 1 (10%) 4 (16%) 1 (9%)
Median duration of response in weeks (range)
31 (10-96) 31 (16-96) 29 (10-84) 39 (27-51)
RESPONSE TO AZD 2281, Parp inhibitor - OLAPARIB BY PLATINUM-FREE INTERVAL
0
6
12
18
24
CR/PR SD >4 months PD
Pla
tin
um
-fre
e in
terv
al (
mo
nth
s)
Sensitive Resistant Refractory
CORRELATION OF PLATINUM SENSITIVITY WITH RESPONSE TO OLAPARIB
SINGLE AGENT TREATMENT WITH OLAPARIB
Well tolerated oral therapy not associated with the typical toxicities of chemotherapy
Clear evidence of beneficial tumour response in BRCA mutated ovarian cancer patients
• 46% (21/46 pts) response rate (RECIST or GCIG CA125)
• 15% meaningful disease stabilisation
• Total clinical benefit rate of 61%
• Median response duration: 8 m
Randomized trials now underway
Question: What proportion of ovarian cancer patients will have BRCA1/2 dysfunction, either due to mutation of either gene or for other reasons, e.g. methylation of this or related genes?
Answer: • approx 15% of sporadic ovarian cancers have mutation of either gene; in serous histological subtypes, proportion is 18%• approx 15-20% more cases have BRCA dysfunction, through methylation, etc.• approx 10% have FANCF methylation
Therefore: potentially half the cases of serous ovarian ca could benefit from targeted single agent treatment - how can these be identified?
POTENTIAL OF PARP INHIBITOR (SINGLE AGENT) IN SPORADIC OVARIAN CANCER
Phase I-II studies
Phase I: Combination with - platinum, topotecan
Phase II: Single agent BRCA +/-
Randomized Phase II/III Post chemo consolidation/maintenance Combination/maintenance
Carbo/taxol +/- Parp inhibitor
Parp Inhibition
Compelling efficacy data in hereditary ovarian cancer patients
Studies in hereditary ovarian cancer.
High grade serous histology – “BRCAness”
Without BRCA mutations
Combination studies
Chemotherapy
Targeted agents
PARP Inhibitors in Clinical Trials
Agent Company Strategy Administration
AG014699 Pfizer Combination* IV
KU59436 AstraZeneca-Kudos
Single Oral
ABT-888 Abbott Single Oral
BSI-201 BiPar SingleCombinations
IV
INO-1001 Inotek-Genentech
Combination* IV
MK Merck Single agent and combination
Oral
GPI 21016 MGI Pharma Combination* Oral
Adapted Ratnam K, Low JA Clin Cancer Res 2007;13: 1383-1388
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF OLAPARIB - 1
RANDOMISE
Patients with advanced ovarian cancer with BRCA-1 or 2 mutations, relapsed within 12 months of platinum-based chemotherapy
olaparib 400 mg bd cont
olaparib 200 mg bd cont
caelyx/doxil 50 mg/m2 q4 weekly
n = 90, recruitment completeprimary end point = PFS
statistical analysis: combined olaparib arms vs caelyx/doxil, aimed at detecting incr. in PFS from 4 m to 7.3 m (HR 0.55, 80% power)
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF OLAPARIB - 2
RANDOMISE
Patients with serous ovarian cancer, responding to 2nd or 3rd line platinum-based chemo, with CR/PR (penultimate treatment-free interval >6 m)
olaparib 400 mg bduntil PD
- BRCA mutation not necessary
placebo until PD
n = 250
Primary end point: progression-free survival
Recruitment now underway
PATIENT SELECTION FOR SINGLE AGENT
Predictive biomarker:
• immunohistochemistry, with BRCA 1/2 antibodies
• functional (ex vivo) test for loss of HR (RAD 51 foci-formation)
• molecular signature (gene array)
and/or: background of •repeated response to platinum-based chemo
•prolonged survival (>5 yrs)
•serous histology