new business presentations
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Our experience,your success.
Institutional Client Prospecting and Pitching
Catrina Arbuckle, Mercer Investment ConsultingPhilip Robinson, Investit
February 1 2006
Page 2
Institutional Client Prospecting and Pitching Cycle
Manager researchand selection
Pre pitch
Short list
Long list RFPs
Final presentation
Post pitch
Consultants significantly influence over
90% of selections
Manager researchand selection
Pre pitch
Short list
Long list RFPs
Final presentation
Post pitch
Consultants significantly influence over
90% of selections
Page 3
New business conversion rates
Investit research: Over 100 respondents interviewed during 2005, representing over £100bn of pensions assets
Onto RFP long list without consultant
endorsement
18%
25%
35% *
75%
83%
Picked a winner without consultant
steerRFP long list to short
list
Presentation on the day critical
Consultant influence
* Significantly dependent upon type of mandate
Consultant influence important. Presentation on the day critical
from Long List RFP to winning final presentation
Page 4
New business conversion rates
Investit research: Over 100 respondents interviewed during 2005, representing over £100bn of pensions assets
RFP long list to win - Gold
70%
45%
27%
14%
RFP long list to win - Silver
RFP long list to win - Average
RFP long list to win - Poor
Need for evidence on hit rates and decisions on where improvements can be made
Page 5
Importance of RFPs
• “…the RFP is rarely if ever a deal breaker… ”
• “…we will not put a manager onto the short list if they miss the long list RFP deadline..”
• “…in any RFP there are usually between six and ten questions that are investment specific and bespoke. These are the ones that need highlighting and where the best brains need to consider the issues thoroughly… ”
• “… nothing annoys a consultant more than a manager not answering the question. It’s a bit like the A level teacher going on about it – answer the question posed and not the question you would like to answer…”
• “… RFP people are generally unloved in the industry and to get good ones is rare. Keep telling them they are good, that they had a role in new business wins, and that their writing skills are respected. Feedback is all for motivation…’
Manager research views dominate. RFPs hopefully verify these
Responses
Page 6
Property RFP
Strengths
• Easily read
• Informative when opinion is solicited
• Clearly stock selection driven
• Clearly collegiate approach
Weaknesses• Philosophy is not spelt out
• What is the global research platform and how does it matter?
• Too modest about valuation skills
• Approach to risk unclear
• The credentials of new CIO and COO are swamped by the loss of predecessors
• Explaining interaction of team and specialists
• Claims benefits of membership of parent group with no evidence of gain
A real benchmarking example
Page 7
10%
15%
0% 10% 20% 30%
It’s the 80/20 rule – better to leave well alone
Once on the long list – leave the short listing decision to consultant!
Would pension respondent accept calls before short
listing
Would consultant accept calls before
short listing
Page 8
Pre-pitch calls
•What the pre-pitch calls need to ascertain (in order of respondent perceived importance):
• Areas of specific interest to trustee decision makers
• Who to represent the client and their motivations
• Timing of the meeting (steer on actual presentation time and Q&A)
• Seniority, calibre and number of people expected to present from manager (fund manager, client relationship, senior person)
• Likely questions to be posed
Pre-pitch calls important for establishing pre-pitch rapport and empathy
Page 9
Up to 20 minutes. Someone with relationship and/or investment articulate
Who to undertake pre-pitchWho to make the pre-pitch calls?
20%
20%
50%
70%
75%
80%
80%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Salesperson
Someone from RFP team
Fund manager
Consultant relationship manager
Client relationship manager
Someone who will definitely be at firstpresentation
Someone who has relationship
Pre-Pitching.Who to make the calls?
Page 10
Presentation – PETE’s law
Passion We want you
Enthusiasm We love what we do
Tailored We have thought about you
Example Tell stock stories
75% of the decision down to presentation on the day
Page 11
Presentation protocol – what the best are doing• Rehearse, rehearse, rehearse
• Ensure presenting team chemistry
• Off copy, whites of the eyes
• Tailoring with specific examples – display empathy
• Team work from RFP to final presentation – engage investment experts
• Less is more – fewer slides
• 1 main point per slide
• Careful on technology
• Aural not visual audience
• Client tailoring (an IT brand company differs from public sector)
Page 12
Top presentation tips (as given by two consultants)
“Short and simple”
•Your requirements
•Our experience
•Our size, clout, safe pair of hands
•We really want your business
“You Tarzan, me Jane”
• You
• Me/us
• Us/team
• Investment process
• Investment performance
• Employ me!
Six to 10 pages if possible. Marketing people to spot train spotters!
Page 13
Post pitch
•Record keeping on who contacted and how effective an exchange
•Client Relationship Management (CRM) systems and inputting
•Assessment of effectiveness throughout the Client Prospecting and Pitching Cycle
• Immediate and ‘cool down’ debrief’ from prospect and consultant
The dignity of failure. Best not to go into denial and instead learn from experience
Page 14
Finals Presentations Client Expectations
• That the consultant has briefed you with their requirements
• That you will provide stats/RFPs/requested information to deadline
• That they will meet the person that they will work with i.e. the CRM
• That they will also meet an investment bod be it Investment Specialist or Fund Manager
• That the performance stats in your presentation will resemble stats shown to them by the consultant
• That the consultant will prep them with appropriate questions to ask
• That you want their business
The consultant’s view
Page 15
Things that work • Understanding the parent company and the personalities in the Trustee Group
• Tailoring the CRM and presentation accordingly
• Understanding how the group will come to a decision
• Being subtle if using your background knowledge of the client/group
• Knowing how many candidates have been short listed and where you are in the agenda
• Being honest (no really !!) and avoiding spin
• No-one ever lost a pitch because they were too brief (Bill Muysken – Mercer Global Head of Research)
The consultant’s view
Page 16
Things that don’t work • Bad time management
• Not reading the audience
• Introducing yourself to someone from your own organisation
• Sending techies unless appropriate
• Sending “salesmen” unless appropriate
• Jokes or gimmicks unless you really think you know your audience
• Slating the competition in your presentation
• Turning up to the wrong venue
• Botching the Trustees arrival at your offices
• Annoying the consultant pre-presentation
The consultant’s view
Page 17
Market move to preferred manager choice
•Trying to streamline the manager selection process at some consultants:
• Traditional approach - Used about 60% of the time. Long list dialogue and move to short list and final beauty parade
• Local authorities – competitive tender behaviour as enshrined by European law
• Short listing only – Used about 25% of the time
• Preferred manager choice – c20% of time at one consultant. Most efficient as less time. Also most expensive
Distribution changing. Meetings/RFPs more qual than quant
Research findings
Page 18
Institutional Client Prospecting and Pitching Cycle
Manager researchand selection
Pre pitch
Short list
Long list RFPs
Final presentation
Post pitch
Consultants significantly influence over
90% of selections
Manager researchand selection
Pre pitch
Short list
Long list RFPs
Final presentation
Post pitch
Consultants significantly influence over
90% of selections
Page 19
Questions