new clare twigger-ross - social impact - appendices · 2014. 3. 22. · 7 appendix 3 list of social...
TRANSCRIPT
1
HBC/10/2A
THE MERSEY GATEWAY PROJECT
(MERSEY GATEWAY BRIDGE)
SOCIAL IMPACT
APPENDICES TO PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF
Dr. Clare Twigger-Ross
2
Appendices
Appendix 1 Construction area map
Appendix 2 Overview of social research
Appendix 3 List of SIA variables
Appendix 4 Maps of vulnerable groups distribution, education facilities,
health facilities and leisure facilities in Halton
Appendix 5 Relevant legislation and policy
Appendix 6 Summary of impacts and effects
Appendix 7 Summary of objections and responses
Appendices 8 – 17 articles and extracts referred to in proof of evidence
Appendix 8 Barrow 1997
Appendix 9 Petts 1999
Appendix 10 IAIA 2003
Appendix 11 Burdge 2004
Appendix 12 Vanclay 2003
Appendix 13 Extracts from Office of National Statistics
Appendix 14 Meadows 2008
Appendix 15 Extracts on regeneration projects from HBC website
Appendix 16 Extract from Urban Renewal Baseline
Appendix 17 Halton Borough Council Focus on the economic downturn
3
Appendix 1 Construction Areas
4
Appendix 2: Overview of social research
Stage of Research
Method of Data Collection
Focus of the survey Survey Report
Stage 1 Eight focus group with residents, 9 in-depth interviews with businesses, telephone survey with 201 businesses, on-street survey with wider travelling public at 10 different locations (500), workshop with stakeholders.
Research was undertaken to identify the current perceptions and travel needs within Halton and consideration of different bridge options
New Mersey Crossing Consultation –Stage One (2002)
Stage 2 Six focus groups with residents, 3 workshops with businesses and 1 workshop with local interest groups, postal survey with all stakeholders (1545 returned).
Research was undertaken to quantify support for a new crossing within Halton and identify any preferred route options
New Mersey Crossing Consultation –Stage Two Route Consultation (2003)
Stage 3 Eight focus groups were consulted with residents, employees and employers.
Research was undertaken to identify respondents’ viewsregarding the implementation of tolls on the New Bridge and/or the Silver Jubilee Bridge
New Mersey Crossing Tolling Feasibility Study (2004)
Stage 4 Postal survey amongst local businesses and random sample of households (2,400 questionnaires sent).
Research was undertaken to determine driver sensitivity in relation to travel/time cost and see if this is in line with DfT’s default values for Economic Assessments, to provide more specific values of time relative to drivers currently crossing the River and give greater confidence when modelling how drivers will behave under different future scenarios
New Mersey Crossing Quantitative Research Stated Preference (2004)
5
Stage of Research
Method of Data Collection
Focus of the survey Survey Report
involving increased journey time to avoid a toll.
Stage 5 Numerous questionnaires were distributed in local facilities along with reply paid envelopes in addition to random on street interviews in Runcorn and Widnes town centres. For the purpose of assessment Halton was spilt into eight regions with one north and one south of Halton. For reference these regions were spilt as follows;
1 – Riverside;2 – Hough Green, Ditton and Hale;3 – Farnwoth and Birchfield;4 – Halton View, Appleton and Kingsway;
5 – Mersey;6 – Halton Brook, Grange and Heath;7 – Halton Castle, Halton Lea, Beechwood;
8 – Daresbury, Windmill Hill, Norton North and Norton South;9 – Areas north of Halton; and10 – Areas south of Halton.
Research was undertaken to determine the use ofcommunity facilities and frequently made trips to key destination types, in order to map how people use the space in their local areas.
Community Facilities Research (2005)
Stage 6 582 questionnaires (55.6%) returned from Halton Citizens’ Panel.
Research aimed to investigate how people perceive their local area and how involved they
Mersey Gateway Social Impact Assessment Quality of Life
6
Stage of Research
Method of Data Collection
Focus of the survey Survey Report
are in community activities.
Survey (2005)
Stage 7 Nine focus groups were conducted with vulnerable and other groups identified as part of the socio-economic impact assessment. A telephone survey took place with Black and Minority Ethnic groups (BME) respondents due to the cancellation of that focus group. In addition, a quantitative survey (502face-to-face interviews) of residents residing close to the Silver Jubilee Bridge (SJB) and the route of the proposed Project.
Research aimed to explore the perceptions and attitudes of residents and employees towards the Project and its potential effects on those who are most likely to be affected by construction and operation of the Project
Mersey Gateway Social ImpactAssessment (2007)
7
Appendix 3 List of social impact assessment variables (taken from
Burdge, 2004a an extract of which is in Appendix 11)
Impact 1 – Population change
Definition: The movement of people into or out of a specified geographic area,
over a specified time period as result of the project.
Rationale: The magnitude and rate of population change has important
implications for community infrastructure requirements and may be a major
determinant of other financial and social impacts in the project area. Three key
indicators are important: the size of the population change, the density of the
population change, the density of population in the impact area and the rate of
influx or outflux of persons.
Impact 2 – Influx or Outflux of temporary workers
Definition: The temporary movement into or out of a specified geopolitical area
over a specified period of time, as a result of the project.
Rationale: Some of the social impacts in a project setting can be traced to the
number and composition of the construction and associated workers who are
introduced to the impact area. Some of the impacts of the workers are
temporary (i.e. housing and health needs) while others may be permanent –
such as unused infrastructure capacity
Impact 3 Presence of an outside Agency
Definition: Permanent residence in the project area of a govt. agency or private
sector organisation who has not previously been in the community and whose
management and control is external to the area.
Rationale: This changes power structures in the community and for
communities to respond positively they will need to feel they have some control
8
over the process. The presence of a new employer may also significantly alter
existing social and power structures within the community.
Impact 4 Change in community infrastructure
Definition: The increase or decrease in the demands for and supply of basic
infrastructure services and facilities
Rationale: Project development can alter the demands put on services.
Population influx that accompanies construction may demand need new
facilities. For example, the population influx that accompanies construction
may result in the expansion or building of new facilities or, at the end of
construction may lead to a reduction in community service levels. If capital
investments are made in new facilities, communities may be faced with excess
capacity during the operation phase of the project.
Impact 5: Change in Economic Inequities
Definition: The degree to which employment opportunities of the proposed
project or development match the job skills of the unemployed in the impact
area
Rationale: Project justification often hinges on the expectation that the
development event will contribute to the employment needs of the impacted
area. One such contribution would be jobs for locals who are presently
unemployed. This social impact variable evaluates the match between jobs
available from the project and the occupational skills of the locally unemployed.
Impact 6: Change in employment equity of minority groups
Definition: The degree to which employment opportunities of the proposed
project match the job skills of minorities to include low-income, younger
persons, ethnic and racial categories and women.
9
Rationale: Jobs resulting from project development tend not to be distributed
equitably either geographically or socially. When assessing the combined
negative impacts (costs) and positive impacts (benefits), patterns must be
identified where matches are present e.g. whether one group is significantly
benefiting, while another is negatively impacted in many different ways. Social
assessors should be aware that the project may indirectly increase or decrease
social inequity in the impact area. This SIA measure expands the variable on
enhanced economic inequities and attempts to determine in benefits will be
extended to specific categories of the unemployed (or indigenous populations)
that otherwise might not have local employment opportunities.
Impact 7 Changing occupational opportunities
Definition: The degree to which the proposed project or development alters the
occupational profile of the impacted area
Rationale: The creation of new occupation opportunities means that local
labour may be drawn from different groups, previously not employed (e.g.
housewives may enter service industries experiencing project-induced growth),
or they may be drawn away from those presently employed. The resulting
change in occupational opportunities may lead to changes in family income,
class-level and even lifestyles. Those not participating in the new occupational
opportunities may also fine their job situation changing. The different types of
jobs available in the community may mean a requirement for a different sets of
skills, which could attract new members to a community which in turn may lead
to social conflict. Indirect effects of increased employment opportunities may
be the retention of young adults in the community who otherwise might have
left. Project development may also discourage local youths from acquiring
higher education levels and remain in non-skilled positions.
Impact 8 Perceptions of health and safety
Definition: Perceptions, attitudes or beliefs on the part of the residents in the
impact area that their physical health and safety, to include their mental well-
10
being will be jeopardised by the proposed activity – e.g. effects of stress from
noise and general disruption.
Rationale: Projects such as nuclear power plant construction and operation and
hazardous (nuclear and chemical) waste site construction and operation may
lead to perceived risk and stress among local residents. While the public’s
assessment of risk is subjective in nature, their fears should not be dismissed
as irrational or unimportant. If there is a widespread belief that the project will
endanger their (and future generations) health, community satisfaction will be
diminished, acceptance of the project and workers will be hindered and
perceptions and interpretation of subsequent positive benefits may not be fully
realised.
Impact 9 Changes to daily living and movement patterns
Definition: Changes in the routine living and work activities of residents in the
impact area caused by alteration to the visual environment, noise, odour levels,
transportation routes or the amount of vehicular traffic resulting from the
project or development.
Rationale: Project construction and operation may cause adverse
environmental change leading residents in the vicinity to alter their movement
patterns and social habits in order to minimise exposure to project related
activity. Such adverse impacts include increased traffic congestion, noise,
odour, air or water pollution and impacts on the visual quality of an area. The
latter is important because it can affect residents’ perceptions of their
community, which in turn may affect how wiling they are to invest time and
money in the area and how likely they are to move elsewhere. A change in the
community image may also influence whether outsiders will visit, live or
establish businesses in the area.
Impact 10 Change to social networks
Definition: The termination or disruption of normal community social interaction
(including friendship and kin relations) by project activity and development.
11
Rationale: The normal flow of informal communication in an area may be
disrupted by the project. An example would be the construction of physical
barriers to existing vehicular or pedestrian routes. Such disruption will affect
some social groups more than others. For example, persons with low incomes
may be unable to afford the increased time and expense to continue former
relationships. The elderly and physically disabled may be cutoff from support
networks. The disruption of social networks will always occur in the case of
significant population relocation, particularly if accompanied by water
impoundment, highway development and pipeline construction.
Impact 11 Change in leisure opportunities
Definition: An increase or decrease in leisure/recreational opportunities due to
changes in the management of natural resources within the impacted areas.
Rationale: The number and type of leisure opportunities available in a
community has an important influence on resident’s satisfaction with their
community. Recreational developments may add to, or change the nature of,
available leisure opportunities.
12
Appendix 4 – Maps showing location of vulnerable groups, education facilities, health
facilities and leisure facilities in Halton
VULNERABLE GROUPLOCATIONS
WITHIN HALTON
20.2
ENVIRONMENTALSTATEMENT
MG_REP_EIA_007
Ethnic Minorities
*Elderly, LTLI
Elderly
*Elderly, LTLI
Disabled, Elderly, LTLI
LTLI
Ethnic Minorities
Deprivation, Disabled, LTLI, Unemployment
Deprivation, Disabled, LTLI, Unemployment
Ethnic Minorities
Disabled, LTLI
Elderly, Ethnic Minorities, LTLI, Unemployment
Ethnic Minorities, LTLI
Deprivation, Disabled, LTLI
Disabled, Elderly, Ethnic Minorities, LTLIDeprivation, LTLI, Unemployment
*Deprivation, Disabled, Ethnic Minorities, LTLI
Disabled, LTLI, Unemployment
Deprivation, Elderly, LTLI, Unemployment
Deprivation, Disabled, LTLI, Unemployment
This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission ofOrdnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright.Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings.Halton Borough Council Licence No. 100018552 2007.
´KEY
Report Title
Report Number
Figure Title
Figure Number
LegendPlanning Application BoundaryTransport & Works Act BoundaryHalton Ward Boundaries
No. of Vulnerable Groups Identified in LSOA01234
0 1,000 2,000500 Meters
OVERALL IMD RANKINGWITHIN HALTON
20.6
ENVIRONMENTALSTATEMENT
MG_REP_EIA_007
Hale
Daresbury
Heath
Ditton
Riverside
Mersey
Farnworth
Halton Castle
Halton ViewKingsway
Halton Lea
GrangeNorton North
Birchfield
Appleton
Norton South
Beechwood
Halton Brook
Broadheath
Hough Green
Windmill Hill
This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission ofOrdnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright.Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings.Halton Borough Council Licence No. 100018552 2007.
´KEY
Report Title
Report Number
Figure Title
Figure Number
LegendTransport & Works Act BoundaryPlannig Application BoundaryIMD 2007 Worst 4%IMD 2007 Worst 20%
IMD Rank 2007306 - 25202521 - 56425643 - 99379938 - 1606316064 - 2151221513 - 28232
0 1,000 2,000500 Meters
EDUCATION DEPRIVATIONAND BASELINE WITHIN HALTON
20.9
ENVIRONMENTALSTATEMENT
MG_REP_EIA_007
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm nmnmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmnmnm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nmn
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
^
^
^̂
^^
#*
#*
#*
#*
Hale
Daresbury
Heath
Ditton
Riverside
Mersey
Farnworth
Halton Castle
Halton ViewKingsway
Halton Lea
GrangeNorton North
Birchfield
Appleton
Norton South
Beechwood
Halton Brook
Broadheath
Hough Green
Windmill Hill
This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission ofOrdnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright.Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings.Halton Borough Council Licence No. 100018552 2007.
´KEY
Report Title
Report Number
Figure Title
Figure Number
Legend#* Special Schools
^ 6th Form Colleges
n Secondary Schools
nm Primary SchoolsPlanning Application BoundaryTransport & Works Act BoundaryEducation IMD 2007 Worst 4%Education IMD 2007 Worst 20%Halton Ward Boundaries
Education IMD 2007 Ranking1003 - 34053406 - 58675868 - 90119012 - 1343013431 - 2263722638 - 29240
0 1,000 2,000500 Meters
% CAR/ VAN OWNERSHIPWITHIN HALTON
20.13
ENVIRONMENTALSTATEMENT
MG_REP_EIA_007
Hale
Daresbury
Heath
Ditton
Riverside
Mersey
Farnworth
Halton Castle
Halton ViewKingsway
Halton Lea
GrangeNorton North
Birchfield
Appleton
Norton South
Beechwood
Halton Brook
Broadheath
Hough Green
Windmill Hill
This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission ofOrdnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright.Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings.Halton Borough Council Licence No. 100018552 2007.
´KEY
Report Title
Report Number
Figure Title
Figure Number
LegendProject Planning Application Boundary
Transport and Works Act Boundary
Halton Ward Boundaries
LSOA where Car/ Van Ownership >UK Mean
% Residents with No Car/ Van
1 - 8.7
8.7 - 17.5
17.5 - 26.4
26.4 - 35.1
35.1 - 45.2
45.2 - 58.7
0 1,250 2,500625 Meters
HEALTH DEPRIVATION AND% OF INDIVIDUALS
WITH A LTLI IN HALTON
20.14
ENVIRONMENTALSTATEMENT
MG_REP_EIA_007
®v
®v
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XX
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Hale
Daresbury
Heath
Ditton
Riverside
Mersey
Farnworth
Halton Castle
Halton ViewKingsway
Halton Lea
GrangeNorton North
Birchfield
Appleton
Norton South
Beechwood
Halton Brook
Broadheath
Hough Green
Windmill Hill
Highfield Hospital
Halton General Hospital
This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission ofOrdnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright.Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings.Halton Borough Council Licence No. 100018552 2007.
´KEY
Report Title
Report Number
Figure Title
Figure Number
Legend
X GPs
®v HospitalsTransport & Works Act BoundaryPlanning Application BoundaryHealth IMD 2007 Worst 4%Health IMD 2007 Worst 20%Halton Ward BoundaryLSOA with LTLI above UK Mean
Health IMD 2007 Ranking32 - 958959 - 24952496 - 42054206 - 81218122 - 1202812029 - 17277
% Residents with LTLI!( 6 - 9!( 10 - 16!( 17 - 21!( 22 - 25!( 26 - 32
0 1,250 2,500625 Meters
LOCATIONS OF SERVICESAND FACILITIES IN HALTON
20.17
ENVIRONMENTALSTATEMENT
MG_REP_EIA_007
!(
!(
!(
!(
Hale
Daresbury
Heath
Ditton
Riverside
Mersey
Farnworth
Halton Castle
Halton ViewKingsway
Halton Lea
GrangeNorton North
Birchfield
Appleton
Norton South
Beechwood
Halton Brook
Broadheath
Hough Green
Windmill Hill
This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission ofOrdnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright.Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings.Halton Borough Council Licence No. 100018552 2007.
´KEY
Report Title
Report Number
Figure Title
Figure Number
LegendPlanning Application Boundary
Transport & Works Act Boundary
!( Libraries
") Leisure Centres
#* Community Rooms
^ Community Centres
E Churches & Village Halls
Secondary Shopping Area
Primary Shopping Area
Ancient woodland
!. Tennis club
I" Post offices
"/ Cricket Clubs
Rugby Clubs
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! Playgrounds
Playing Fields & Parks
Nature Reserves & Woodlands
Golf Courses
Football Pitches
Bowling Greens
Halton Ward Boundaries
0 1,000 2,000500 Meters
13
Appendix 5 Relevant Legislation and Policy
Policy, Legislation and Background
Summary of key issues identified for the Socio - Economic Impact Assessment
International
European Structural Funding
Halton is currently in receipt of European Structural Funding. Funding is awarded over seven year blocks and the current period runs from 2007-2013. There are 2 main types of funding:
• Structural Funds;• Community initiatives funding
National
Sustainable Development Strategy –Securing the Future (2005)
This document states that ‘The goal of sustainable development is to enable all people throughout the world to satisfy their basic needs and enjoy a better quality of life, without compromising the quality of life of future generations’. This strategy seeks to work on local, national and global levels to implement sustainable development through such measures and policies as enabling and encouraging behavioural changes, realising sustainable consumption and production, targeting energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, protecting natural resources and enhancing the environment.
Single Regeneration Budget
The ‘Quality of Life’ within England has been targeted through a 1994 EU initiative; Single Regeneration Budget (SRB) Schemes. Nationally, Local Regeneration Partnerships bid for 6 rounds of SRB funding providing that their Project meets the eligible objectives set for each round. In total 1027 bids were awarded funding, worth over £5.7 billion. SRB funding aims ‘to enhance the quality of life of local people in areas of need by reducing the gap between deprived and other areas, and between different groups’ (Ref. 3). Halton was awarded funding for three schemes, these schemes include:
SRB Round 2 – Runcorn on the Mersey (£12.7M awarded): This Project opened in 1996 and was completed in 2003. The programme aimed to revive Halton through stimulating an increase in economic and social activity via increasing business in the area, increasing the skills base of the area, by providing community support services to residents and in making the area successful, prosperous and attractive;
SRB Round 4 – Realising the Benefits (£2.55M awarded): This Project aimed to create opportunities, remove barriers and promote inclusion in the full economic and social life of Halton. This Project ran from 1998 to 2004; and
SRB Round 5 – Focus for Change (£23M awarded): This Project opened in 1999 and continued until 2006. The focus of expenditure was primarily Widnes, as no previous SRB funding had been spent here. Focus for Change aimed to reduce areas of
14
disadvantage and deprivation.In addition to external government funding, the approved SRB bids attracted private sector investment. For the SRB programmes awarded funding within Halton an additional £103M was provided from other private sources.
Regional
Regional Planning Guidance (RPG) 13 (Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS)
The main aim of RPG13 is to promote sustainable patterns of spatial development and physical change. In order to achieve this aim RPG13s’ seven key objectives are: To achieve greater economic competitiveness and growth, with associated social progress;To secure an urban renaissance in the cities and towns of the North West;To ensure the sensitive and integrated development and management of the coastal zone and secure the revival of coastal resort towns;To sustain and revive the Region’s rural communities and the rural economy;To ensure active management of the Region’s environmental and cultural assets;To secure a better image for the Region and high environmental and design quality; andTo create an accessible Region, with an efficient and fully integrated transport system.RPG13 specifically highlights that a ‘very significant enhancement, in terms of image and opportunities for higher quality of life overall, is required in Runcorn and Widnes’.
North West Development Agency’s (NWDA) ‘Regional Economic Strategy’ (2006)
The NWDA specifically identifies Halton as an area to target for ‘Delivering the basic skills required by employers for those individuals without qualifications’, to ‘Deliver support to improve peoples prospects of getting a job (employability activities) and reduce the high level of Incapacity Benefit claimants’, to ‘Develop and encourage employment creation in or near deprived areas’ and to ‘Develop business start up and support services’. It can therefore be seen that the Project will be created and operate in a location where such social policies must be considered
Local
Halton Unitary Development Plan (UDP) (2005)
Halton became a Unitary Authority in 1998. The current UDP was adopted in April 2005 and sets the framework for development within the Borough up to 2016. The UDP’s main strategic aim is; ‘to transform the quality of Halton's environment and improve economic prosperity and social progress through sustainable development’. This aim is to be achieved through setting targets and objectives for economic development, housing and population, environmental and cultural assets, environmental quality, regeneration, town centres and shopping, transportation, waste and social inclusion. Halton’s UPD aims to achieve social inclusion through the following objectives;
Create more job opportunities through new development and a more diversified economy;Provide for suitable access and facilities in developments for people with disabilities and people with young children;
15
Protect greenspace from development;Protect local shops, recreation and community facilities;Improve public transport;Provide safe and attractive pedestrian routes and extend pedestrianisation of town centres; and to Encourage a proportion of all new houses to be built suitable for the less mobile.
Halton’s UDP recognises that the Mersey Estuary is a major barrier to transportation links between Runcorn and Widnes, and other parts of the sub-regions. The UDP states that ‘the congestion of the existing single road crossing is a major constraint to the economic development of the area and to social and economic interaction within the Borough’ and that these issues are an objective for the UDP to resolve. The UDP’s main strategic aim of Economic Development includes an objective ‘to promote schemes of economic importance within the Borough including the New Mersey Crossing’.
Neighbourhood Renewal Areas
Halton is listed as one of the government defined Neighbourhood Renewal Areas. Neighbourhood Renewal Areas (NRA) are defined under ‘A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal: National Strategy Action Plan, 2001’ and are listed as the top 88 most deprived Boroughs within England. NRA are those listed within the top 50 most disadvantaged within England against any of the six district level summaries of the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). Two long term visions are set out by the National Strategy Action Plan which consist of:‘In all poorest neighbourhoods, to have common goals of lower worklessness and crime, and better health, skills, housing and physical environment’; and‘To narrow the gap on these measures between the most deprived neighbourhoods and the rest of the country’.
The Halton Strategic Partnership Board (HSPB) was set up to oversee the management of the distribution of this funding in the most efficient way and to areas of greatest need. Five Strategic Priorities were identified for Halton (as identified by Halton’s Community Strategy). A thematic group for each priority was formed to sit under the HSPB in order to identify need within that thematic area, commission projects, allocate funding and monitor progress against subsequently developed Service Level Agreements.
The Working Neighbourhoods Fund (WNF) was introduced in 2008 and superseded the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund (NRF). Funding is spread across the five strategic priorities to form a commissioning pot. This pot is used to fund three cross-cutting areas that were identified in the Local Area Agreement as areas where progress was proving difficult, but where improvement would have a positive effect on meeting a wide range of existing targets. These three areas were alcohol misuse, anti-social behaviour, and worklessness/skills/enterprise. Funding for ‘Employment, Learning & Skills’ is combined with funding received from the Safer and Stronger Communities Fund (SSCF) to provide a single coherent programme of interventions. The
16
WNF and SSCF provide over £12M worth of funding for Halton between 2009 and 2011.
Halton Strategic Partnership‘A Community Strategy for a Sustainable Halton 2006 –2011, Making it Happen in Halton’
Halton’s Strategic Partnership outlined a number of socio economic objectives and targets to be achieved within Halton by 2011 in; ‘A Community Strategy for a Sustainable Halton 2006 –2011, Making it Happen in Halton’. The key themes which were identified by this strategy are:
A Healthy Halton;Halton’s Urban Renewal;Halton’s Children and Young People;Employment, Learning and Skills in Halton; andA Safer Halton
Halton Strategic Partnership stated that the main key themes identified above are to be achieved in the medium term through:
Improving health;Improving the skills base in the Borough;Improving educational attainment across the Borough;Creating employment opportunities for all; Tackling worklessnessTackling the low wage economy;Improving environmental assets and how the Borough looks;Creating prosperity and equality of opportunity;Reducing crime and anti-social behaviour;Improving amenities for all age groups;Furthering economic and urban regeneration;Tackling contaminate land;Creating opportunities/ facilities/ amenities for children and young people;Supporting the ageing population;Minimising waste/ increasing recycling/ bringing efficiencies in waste disposal;Increasing focus on community engagement; andRunning services efficiently.
Halton is currently in the process of adopting a revised Community Strategy, which is likely to be formally adopted in Summer 2009. The key themes will remain the same as noted above, but will contain updated targets in line with the LAA. This Strategy will include explicit reference to the Mersey Gateway Project.
Halton’s Corporate Plan (2006 – 2011)
Halton’s Corporate plan, ‘Its all Happening in Halton 2006 –2011’ outlines the goals which the Council aspire to achieve by 2011 to create a better future for Halton. The vision for Halton, which guides their key priorities and actions states; ‘Halton will be a thriving and vibrant Borough where people can learn and develop their skills, enjoy a good quality of life with good health; a high quality, modern urban environment; the opportunity for all to fulfil their potential; greater wealth and equality; sustained by a thriving business community; and safer, stronger and more
17
attractive neighbourhoods’. Key priorities are identified within the corporate plan and, for each, realistic objectives and targets are set. These key priorities are grouped in six themes, which mirror Halton’s main priorities throughout all the council’s adopted strategies, including those in Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy and the UDP. These key themes consist of:
A Healthy Halton;Halton’s Urban Renewal;Halton’s Children and Young People;Employment, Learning and Skills in Halton;A Safer Halton; andCorporate Effectiveness and Business Efficiency.
Local Area Agreement for Halton (June 2008 – April 2011)
Halton’s Local Area Agreement (LAA) is a three year agreement which forms the delivery plan for Halton’s Community Strategy. The agreement mirrors the vision and five strategic aims (a – e) which are highlighted above by Halton’s Community Strategy. The LAA specifically identifies seven key priority deprived wards within which Halton aims to ‘close the gap’ between the most deprived communities and Halton overall. The wards, which were identified on the basis of census and IMD data are;Halton Castle;Windmill Hill;Halton Lea;Grange;Riverside;Kingsway; andAppleton.Of these wards, the Project passes through Halton Castle, Halton Lea, Grange and Riverside.Halton Specialist Strategic Partnerships will be responsible for the delivery of the LAA.
Halton Local Transport Plan 2006 – 2011
The main objective of Halton’s Local Transport Plan (LTP2) (2006 – 2011) is ‘The delivery of a smart, sustainable, inclusive and accessible transport system and infrastructure that seeks to improve the quality of life for people living in Halton by encouraging economic growth and regeneration, and the protection and enhancement of the historic, natural and human environment’. Further to achieving the LTP main objective four additional objectives have been identified comprising; Tackling Congestion, Delivering Accessibility, Safer Roads and Better Air Quality.
18
Appendix 6: Summary of impacts and effects from Chapter 20 of
the Environmental Statement
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
Construction Phase
Individuals and families within communities and LSOAs surrounding the Project –High Importance
Temporary Moderate magnitudeShort termIndirect
Moderate Negative
Low NegativeIncreased pressure to community facilities and services (e.g. health centres, hospitals, leisure facilities).
Individuals and families within the rest of Halton –Moderate Importance
TemporaryLow magnitudeShort termIndirect
Low Negative
Raise awareness amongst local residents of facilities and services which are likely to experience increased pressures during the construction period
Appropriately targeted provision of financial contributions where necessary to relieve specific pressure points within the Borough
Not Significant
Individuals and families within communities and LSOAs surrounding the Project –High Importance
TemporaryModerate magnitudeShort termIndirect
Moderate Negative
Low NegativeIncreased feeling of insecurity amongst residents (associated with an influx of workers to the area)
Individuals and families within the rest of Halton – High Importance
TemporaryLow magnitudeShort termIndirect
Low Negative
Provision of Community liaison officer to ensure relations between construction workers and residents are upheld
Provision of contact name/ number to local residents/ police to contact further to any incidents/ fear of incidents
Not Significant
Change in population structure
Economicbenefits
Individuals and families within
Temporary Low
Low Positive No enhancement
Low Positive
19
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
through increased expenditure within Halton (e.g. through local shops, leisure centres, private renting sector)
Halton –High Importance
magnitudeShort termIndirect
measures required
Increase/ decrease in job opportunities available to local residents
Appropriately skilled/ qualified individuals seeking employment within Halton –High Importance
TemporaryHigh magnitudeShort termDirect
High Positive Provision of relevant training programmes within Halton prior to construction to ensure a greater skills pool within the area from which to resource.
High Positive
Change in Employment Opportunities
Effects to employees of businesses affected through ProjectCPOs.
Employees who travel to Halton for employment and also those who live locally and work in Halton – High Importance
PermanentHigh MagnitudeLong termDirect
High Negative
Provision of Mersey Gateway Relocation Strategy proving advice and support to affected businesses.
Low Negative
Travelling Public (Car and Bus users)High Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Low Negative No additional mitigation to be provided further to that detailed within the Transport Chapter 16.
Low NegativeHealth implications through disruption in access to health facilities and increased traveller stress
Travelling Public (Pedestrians and Cyclists)High Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Not Significant
No mitigation measures required
Not Significant
Change in perception or actual health and safety issues for individuals in Halton
Change in exercise uptake through disruptions to footpaths and
Travelling Public (Pedestrians and Cyclists)High Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Low Negative No Mitigation to be provided
Low Negative
20
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
cycleways
Individuals and families within communities and LSOAs surrounding the Mersey Gateway ProjectHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termDirect
Low Negative Not Significant
Travelling PublicHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termDirect
Low Negative Not Significant
Construction compound and associated traffic movement health and safety issues;
Employees working within or adjacent to the ProjectHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termDirect
Low Negative
Appropriate traffic management
Implementation of Construction Health and Safety Plan
Provision of adequate signage detailing locations of construction compounds and areas if plant/ HGV movements
Not Significant
Contamination risks through soil, sediment, and groundwater.
All Receptors –as defined in MG_REP_EIA_009
Not Significant
No mitigation measures required
Not Significant
Change in surface water quality
Users of watercourses within Halton(As defined within Chapter 8)
Not Significant
No mitigation measures required
Not Significant
Individuals and families within communities and LSOAs surrounding the ProjectHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termDirect
Low Negative No additional mitigation recommended further to that detailed within the Waste Chapter 15 and the Air Quality Chapter 19.
Low NegativeCreation of Project related Wastes (Dust)
Employees working within or adjacent to the ProjectHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termDirect
Low Negative No additional mitigation recommended further to that detailed within the Air Quality Chapter 19.
Low Negative
21
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
Changes in Air quality resulting from construction traffic emissions (NO2 and PM10)
All social receptors within 200m of Construction Areas A – IHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termDirect
Low Negative No additional mitigation recommended further to that detailed within the Air Quality Chapter 19.
Low Negative
Changes in Air Quality resulting from road traffic emissions (NO2 and PM10)
All social receptors within 200m of Construction Areas A – IHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termDirect
Moderate Negative
No additional mitigation recommended further to that detailed within the Air Quality Chapter 19.
Moderate Negative
Individuals and families within communities and LSOAs surrounding the Mersey Gateway Project
TemporaryModerate magnitudeShort termDirect
Low –Moderate negative
No additional mitigation recommended further to that detailed within the Noise and Vibration Chapter 17
Low -Moderate negative
Changes in Noise & Vibration
Individuals and families within Construction Areas G, Wigg Island and Woodside Primary School High Importance
TemporaryModerate magnitudeShort termDirect
High Negative
No additional mitigation recommended further to that detailed within the Noise and Vibration Chapter 17
High Negative
Changes in health due to perception of a change in landscape and amenity
Individuals and families within HaltonHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Not Significant
No mitigation measures required
Not Significant
Change in access to facilities and social networks
Effects to existing employers/ employees within Halton resulting from disruption from Project construction activities
Employees who travel to Halton for employment and also those who live locally and work in Halton – High Importance
TemporaryModerate MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Moderate Negative
Prior awareness of construction route including all roads which will be closed/ disrupted to local consumers and businesses to ensure that day to day businesses
Low Negative
22
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
operations are not disrupted. Prior awareness and adequate signage to local consumers and businesses of diversions and alternative routes. Provision of signage to advertise businesses which remain open in close proximity to construction activities.
Travelling Public – Car UsersHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Low Negative Prior awareness of road closures and disruptions.
Provision of adequate signage detailing diversionary routes.
Not Significant
Change in access to GPs, health centres and hospitals
Travelling Public –pedestrians and cyclistsHigh Importance
TemporaryLow magnitudeShort termIndirect
Not Significant
No Mitigation Measures required
Not Significant
Change in access to Further Education establishments and special schools
Travelling Public – Car usersHigh Importance
TemporaryModerate MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Moderate Negative
Prior awareness of road closures and disruptions.
Provision of adequate signage detailing diversionary routes.
Low Negative
23
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
Travelling Public – Car UsersHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Low Negative Prior awareness of road closures and disruptions.
Provision of adequate signage detailing diversionary routes.
Not Significant
Change in access to Primary and Secondary Education establishments
Travelling Public –pedestrians and cyclistsHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Low Negative Provision of alternative/ diversionary footpath and cycleway routes. Provision of adequate signage detailing any diversionary footpaths.
Provision of adequate safety measures alongside pavements.
Not Significant
Navigational Effects to users of the River
Users of the River Mersey within Halton -High Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termDirect
Low Negative No mitigation measures recommended further to those detailed in theNavigational Chapter 18.
Low Negative
Travelling Public – Car UsersHigh Importance
TemporaryModerate MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Moderate Negative
Prior awareness of road closures and disruptions.
Provision of adequate signage detailing diversionary routes.
Low NegativeChange in daily movements
Travelling Public –
Temporary Moderate Provision of alternative/
Low Negative
24
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
pedestrians and cyclistsHigh Importance
Moderate MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Negative diversionary footpath and cycleway routes. Provision of adequate signage detailing any diversionary footpaths.
Provision of adequate safety measures alongside pavements.
Change in recreational shooting opportunities in Astmoor
Astmoor Shooting ClubLow Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Low Negative No mitigation measures recommended
Low Negative
Employees who travel to Halton for employment and also those who live locally and work in HaltonHigh Importance
PermanentHigh MagnitudeLong termDirect
High Negative
Provision of Mersey Gateway Relocation Strategy
Low NegativeLoss of Commercial/ Industrial Land/ Property
Individuals and families within HaltonHigh Importance
PermanentHigh MagnitudeLong termIndirect
High Negative
Provision of Mersey Gateway Regeneration Strategy
Low Negative
Individuals and families within communities and LSOAs surrounding the ProjectModerate Importance
PermanentModerate MagnitudeLong termDirect
ModerateNegative
Provision of Mersey Gateway Regeneration Strategy
Moderate Negative
Change in availability of amenity and recreational land
Loss of Greenspace
Individuals and families within the rest of Halton –Moderate Importance
PermanentLow MagnitudeLong termDirect
Low Negative Provision of Mersey Gateway Regeneration Strategy
Low Negative
25
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
Operational Phase
Jobs created through operation of the Project
Individuals and families within HaltonHigh Importance
PermanentLow MagnitudeLong termDirect
Not Significant
No mitigation measures required
Not Significant
Regeneration attracting individuals/ families to remain/ immigrate to Halton
Individuals and families within HaltonHigh Importance
PermanentHigh MagnitudeLong termIndirect
High Positive No mitigation measures provided as part of thisProject
High Positive
Change to Population Structure
Increased pressure to community facilities and services (e.g. health centres, hospitals, leisure facilities).
Individuals and families within HaltonHigh Importance
PermanentModerate MagnitudeLong termIndirect
Moderate Negative
No mitigation measures provided as part of this Project
Moderate Negative
Creation of jobs directly through operation of the Project
Appropriately skilled/ qualified individuals seeking employment within Halton High Importance
PermanentHigh MagnitudeLong termDirect
Moderate Positive
No enhancement measures required
Moderate Positive
Change to Employment Opportunities
Change in travel patterns and job catchment areas due to tolling
Employees –who travel to work in Halton by private vehicleHigh Importance
PermanentHigh MagnitudeLong termDirect
High Negative
Provision of Sustainable Transport Strategy
High Negative
Individuals and families within 2km walking distance and 5km cycling distance from the SJB
High Importance
PermanentModerate MagnitudeLong termIndirect
High Positive High PositiveChange in perception of, or actual health and safety issues for individuals in Halton
Provision of pedestrian and cycling facilities (directly and indirectly as a result of the Project)
Individuals and families within
PermanentLow
Moderate Positive
Integration of pedestrian and cycling facilities with Halton’ s Sustainable Transport Network through the Sustainable Transport Strategy Moderate
Positive
26
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
the rest of HaltonModerate Importance
MagnitudeLong termIndirect
Increase awareness of new and improved routes with adequate signage and publicity.
Contamination risks through soil, sediment, and groundwater.
All Receptors –as defined in MG_REP_EIA_009
Not Significant
No mitigation measures required
Not Significant
Changes in Air Quality –emissions of NO2
Users of the SJB and Greenway RoadHigh Importance
PermanentModerate MagnitudeLong termIndirect
High Positive No enhancement measures required
High Positive
Changes in Air Quality –emissions of NO2
Individuals and families within the rest of HaltonHigh Importance
PermanentModerate MagnitudeLong termIndirect
Moderate Positive
No enhancement measures required
Moderate Positive
Changes in Air Quality –emissions of NO2, PM10
and CO2
Individuals and families within the North WestModerate Importance
PermanentModerate MagnitudeLong termIndirect
Low Positive No enhancement measures required
Low Positive
Individuals at Weston Point and West Bank schoolHigh Importance
PermanentHigh MagnitudeLong termIndirect
High Positive No enhancement measures required
High Positive
Individuals and families residing in close proximity to the SJBHigh Importance
PermanentLow MagnitudeLong termIndirect
Moderate positive
No enhancement measures required
High Positive
Changes in Noise and Vibration
Individuals and families residing in close proximity to construction areas F, G and H
PermanentLow MagnitudeLong termIndirect
Low negative No additional mitigation recommended further to that detailed within the Noise and vibration
Low Negative
27
Impact Effect Receptor and Importance
Nature of Effect
Significance(High/ Moderate/ Low and Positive / Negative)
Mitigation and Enhancement Measure
Residual Significance (Positive/ Negative and High/ Moderate/ Low)
High Importance
chapter 17
Changes in health due to perception of a change in landscape and amenity
Individuals and families within HaltonHigh Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeShort termIndirect
Not Significant
No mitigation measures required
Not Significant
Navigational Effects to users of Watercourses
Users of watercourses within Halton -High Importance
TemporaryLow MagnitudeLong termDirect
Not Significant
No mitigation measures required
Not Significant
Travelling Public – Car Users –High Importance
PermanentModerate magnitudeLong termDirect
High Positive No enhancement measures required
High Positive
Pedestrians and cyclists undertaking cross River trips within HaltonHigh Importance
PermanentModerate magnitudeLong termDirect
High Positive No enhancement measures required
High Positive
Provision of improved access routes
Users of Public Transport undertaking cross River trips in HaltonHigh Importance
PermanentLow magnitudeLong termDirect
High Positive No enhancement measures required
High Positive
Disruption and closure of footpaths and cycleways
Pedestrians and cyclists within Halton undertaking non cross River tripsHigh Importance
PermanentLow magnitudeLong termDirect
Low Negative No mitigation measures recommended further to those detailed within the Transport Chapter 16.
Low Negative
Change in access to facilities and social networks
Change to daily movements through implementation of tolling
Travelling Public – Car UsersHigh Importance
TemporaryHigh MagnitudeLong termDirect
High Negative
Provision of Sustainable Transport Strategy
High Negative
28
Appendix 7 Objections
There are 44 objections (including 7 standard letters) to the Project that specifically refer to socio-economic issues and these are addressed in the following tables. They have been grouped according to themes that are raised by the objectors.
MG Party No:
TWA Ref
Name
1, 11, 12OBJ/40, 77, 14
CPRE , Transport Activists Round Table North West , Friends of the Earth
ObjectionConflicts with development plans & national policies including reducing social exclusion, tackling health inequalities and improving overall quality of life.
Response
Policy issues are addressed by John Brooks. However, on balance in relation to social exclusion, health inequalities and overall quality of life, I consider that the Project together with the Mersey Gateway Regeneration Strategy and Sustainable Transport Strategy has the potential to facilitate improvements in those areas through improved accessibility and employment.
MG Party No:
TWA Ref
Name
2, 11,12, 61, 123, 455,460,
470,
OBJ/ 77,
14,18, 58
CPRE and Transport Activists Round Table North West, Friends of the Earth, Mrs Wallace, DW Edwards, Mrs D Doran, D and S Bullock, Suzanne Edwards, Standard
letters 5, 6 and 7
Objection
Effects of the Project including effects on quality of life, health effects on humans. Negative health effects due to increased traffic fumesFurther study and modelling required with regards to potential impact on human health and request that a full health impact assessment is undertaken. Concern that no HIA was undertaken. Disturbance of contaminated sediment could risk aggravating health problems of local people. Concerns over health and safety of construction workers.
Response
Mr Nicholson (HBC/2/1P para14.1.1) reports on the rapid HIA that was carried out which did not come to any overall conclusion on the net effect of the Project on the population of Halton because of the diversity of health outcomes. I conclude that there is the potential for some improved health outcomes both directly from increased opportunities for walking and cycling and indirectly from
29
improvements in employment and accessibility. Mr Cossons addresses contamination in his proof of evidence (HBC/17/1P).
MG Party No: TWA Ref Name
2 ,11, 12,27,45,61,78,95, 123, 126, 128,136,
141, 131, 474, 473
OBJ/77,14, 8, 107, 69,
REP/06, OBJ/58,
117, 115, 116
CPRE and Transport Activists Round Table North West, Friends of the Earth, Halton,
Preston Brook Parish Council, Colin Keenan, National Alliance Against Tolls, Great
Sankey Parish Council, D.W Edwards, Paul Fry, Michael Gelling, Finn Family, Mrs S M
Spruce, P.A Thompson, Mr and Mrs P Bazley, Peter Balgobin, Standard letters 1 -
7
Objection
Tolls will introduce new costs into existing deprived communities (amongst highest in England). Objection to tolls which will disadvantage all residents, specifically those on Runcorn side who will have to pay to access services in Widnes (where there are more services). Tolling will reduce small business competitiveness and may force closures, bring less trade to own shops as people go to Warrington rather than cross the riverTolls forcing companies to relocate elsewhere. Existing free bridge joins two towns financially into a single borough. Tolls will split community, which has only recently become united. People will not be able to afford tolls to access places of work. Toll prices will hinder regeneration.
Response
Tolls will be a new cost. However, there is a framework in place to secure benefits alongside those costs which is detailed in Mr Nicholson’s proof (HBC/2/1P). Halton Council have resolved to seek toll discounts for local residents and frequent users. See Mr Parr (HBC/1/1P) and Mr Nicholson’s proofs (HBC/2/1P). As well as a framework for discounts, there will be substantial improvements in public transport, cycling and walking making them viable alternatives to crossing the bridge by car. The focus of the SJB as a local bridge, together with improvements in public transport, cycling and walking provide the potential to unite the two sides of the borough. The funding from the tolls that will be put into public transport via the Sustainable Transport Strategy
30
together with the Mersey Gateway Regeneration Strategy has the potential to facilitate regeneration. Overall, I consider that these impacts are sufficiently addressed.
MG Party No:
TWA Ref
Name
2,11, 12, 25,
94,132, 458,
OBJ/77, 14, 59,
49
CPRE and Transport Activists Round Table North West, Friends of the Earth, Peter Black, Halton Green Party
(Derek Mellor), Andrew Basden, K. Mayle
Objection
Query over economic regeneration claims, which evidence has shown to be without foundation. Other research has shown that there is no automatic connection between the provision of the new highway infrastructure and economic benefits. Questionable that the Mersey Gateway Project will actually deliver proposed regeneration and job benefits. Questionable how much benefit Mersey Gateway Project will have on local residents, specifically those in deprived areas (i.e. Halton Castle). Wrong to depend on one project for regeneration.
Response
The issue of the regeneration benefits is addressed in Mr Russell’s proof (HBC/9/1P). I consider that the results of Mr Russell’s work indicate that with the Mersey Gateway Regeneration Strategy and the Project in place there will be regeneration benefits to Halton and that these will have benefits to those in deprived areas. (see para of this proof for details). The Project is a vital part of a wider picture of regeneration initiatives in Halton and the wider region.
MG Party No:
TWA Ref
Name
12, 29,61,136, 453, 454, 456,470
OBJ/14, 18, 117
Friends of the Earth, Jimmy Doran, Mrs S M Wallace, Finn Family, Jan Lucas, Petition, Mrs C Hartley,
Suzanne Kennedy. Standard letters 1 - 7
Objection
Construction effects. Negative effects of increased noise, light and air pollution during construction. Disruption of lives due to construction dust and noise Effects of construction on residential areas from dust traffic emissions and noise in addition to upheaval.Construction effects on health, via traffic fumes, pollution dust noise and disturbance.
31
Construction work causing disruption, noise dust and chaosEffect of construction on health of residents in Runcorn from dust, pollution and traffic emissions.Construction traffic and increase in people during construction resulting in pollution and effects on local health and social injustice.
Response
Overall, I consider the effects of construction to be mitigated effectively. The socio-economic impact assessment assessed disruption to daily lives and is reported in this proof and concludes that the effects will be mitigated. Further evidence is detailed in the air quality proof of evidence of Yvonne Brown (HBC/11/1P) and the noise and vibration proof of evidence of Paul Freeborn (HBC/12/1P) which conclude that with mitigation effects would be a low negative to moderate negative depending upon the effect assessed but these effects will be temporary and short term in nature. As noted previously a rapid HIA was carried out and that is reported by Mr Nicholson in his proof of evidence (HBC/2/1P). The rapid Health Impact Assessment concluded that “During construction the majority of activities undertaken will have some potential for negative impacts on peoples’ health in Halton; however, construction activities are temporary and therefore any associated negative health affects will also be short term”. (para 9.1.2 CD195)
MG Party No:TWA Ref
Name
2, 11, 12, 25, 44, 45, 61,
94,95,128,130, 136, 143, 453,454,
455,456, 458, 465, 470, 473,
OBJ/77, 14, 59,
12, 107, 18,
REP/06, 49,117,
CPRE and Transport Activists Round Table North West, Friends of the Earth, Halton, Peter Black, Mr and Mrs Turner, Colin Keenan, Mrs Wallace, Halton Green Party (Derek Mellor), Great Sankey Parish Council, Michael Gelling, Ronald Churchill, Andrew Basden, Finn Family, David and Lynne McCarrick, Jan Lucas, Petition, Mrs D Doran, Mrs C Hartley,
K. Mayle, Peter Wurchbacher, Suzanne Kennedy, Peter Balgobin, Standard letters 1 and 3
Objection
Quality of life reduced as Halton made poorer through increased through traffic in residential area. Operational effects of increase in traffic resulting in reduction in quality of life and potential relocation of residents (e.g. to Warrington). Route of project through residential areas resulting in effects on health from dust, noise & traffic fumes Resulting effects to local residents from extra pollution (air quality, light, noise) adding to social, health and environmental deprivation. Route funnels traffic through residential area which will make health problems worse Objection to route of scheme through residential areas and resulting effects on health from
32
increase in noise and pollution. Disturbance to Great Sankey residents due to excess diverted traffic. Project will increase traffic from Merseyside through centre of Runcorn, will add to existing noise from air, rail and road.
Response
In terms of air quality this is addressed by Ms Brown in her proof (HBC/11/1P). In the socio-economic impact assessment the air quality issues were assessed as not significant in the operational phase. In terms of noise, this is addressed by Mr Freeborn in his proof (HBC/12/1P) and the effects are overall beneficial and mitigation for noise along the central expressway will reduce the effect to low impact.
MG Party No:
TWA Ref Name
25, 29, 30,79,80,81
OBJ/59,1,56,57,55 Peter Black, Jimmy Doran, Bold Nu-Tec Insulation, Arven Chemicals, Rotheram,
Frank and Lesley, Ventcroft Ltd,
ObjectionNo formal approach regarding CPO, Significant effect on employment through relocation, breach of Human Rights, no adequate relocation premises available/ proposed..
Response
The effect of relocation of businesses was assessed in the socio economic impact assessment and discussed in this proof. Halton Council has in place a relocation strategy, discussed by Mr Scarisbrick (HBC/19/1P). Whilst some businesses may be displaced the effect was assessed by the socio-economic impact assessment as not significant after mitigation.
APPENDIX 8
APPENDIX 9
APPENDIX 10
Inte
rnat
iona
l Pri
ncip
les
for
Soci
al I
mpa
ct A
ssss
men
tSOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTInternational Principles
Purpose/BackgroundThis document was prepared over afive year period as an official IAIAProject. Workshops to develop thesePrinciples were held at several IAIAand other conferences across sixcontinents. Several hundred peoplewere consulted in the process ofdrafting the document and some fiftypeople made substantial contributions.
The International Principles is aliving document that will continue tobe modified. This, and all subsequentversions, will be accessible on theIAIA website (www.iaia.org).
This document was prepared for IAIAby Frank Vanclay, to whom feedbackshould be provided.
• Prof Frank VanclayTasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research
University of Tasmania
Private Bag 98Hobart Tasmania 7001Australia+61 3 6226 2618 telephone+61 3 6226 7450 [email protected]
© Copyright InternationalAssociation for Impact Assessment,2002, 2003.
May 2003
Special Publication Series No. 2
INTERNATIONALASSOCIATION forIMPACT ASSESSMENT• Headquarters
1330 23rd Street South, Suite C
Fargo, ND 58103 USA
Phone +1.701.297.7908
Fax +1.701.297.7917
www.iaia.org
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SIA) IS ANALYSING, MONITORING AND
MANAGING THE SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF DEVELOPMENT.
Why have Principles for Social Impact Assessment?
There has been considerable interest in producing “International Guidelines and Principlesfor Social Impact Assessment”. An international document produced under the auspices ofa major organisation such as the International Association for Impact Assessment could:
• Assist in the development of legislation and policy at the national level;
• Provide standards for SIA practice in international contexts (transboundary
projects, development cooperation, foreign investments, international
banking);
• Increase the appeal of SIA to a wider range of audiences, through increasing its
legitimacy/standing;
• Establish minimum standards for SIA practice;
• Provide an articulation of best practice in SIA as a model to aspire to;
• Remove confusion over terminology by establishing a definitive glossary;
• Establish the appropriate scope of the social component of impact assessments;
• Promote the integration of SIA in all impact assessments (especially
environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment).
The process of developing international guidelines and principles however has been difficult.In a truly international context, there are many issues to consider and little can be taken forgranted. The regulatory context varies, the cultural/religious context varies, and social andeconomic priorities for development vary. As the process of developing internationalguidelines and principles progressed, increasing pressure was placed on the conventionalunderstanding of SIA, and a new concept of what SIA was about emerged. This resulted ina revised definition of SIA.
It also became apparent that a definitive document containing the “International Guidelinesand Principles” was a flawed concept. Firstly, because most such documents tend to emphasiseguidelines rather than principles. They fail to realise that guidelines need to be deducedfrom principles, and principles need to be derived from core values. Only by first establishingthe core values of the community of practice, then deriving the principles, and only thendeveloping guidelines, can truly appropriate guidelines emerge. The second flaw is thatguidelines and principles are often developed in non-participatory processes. Even whereparticipatory processes are involved, too often they do not include the people to whom theguidelines are directed. These are the people who ultimately need to develop 'ownership' ofthe guidelines if they are to be adopted and utilised.
This document serves as a discussion document for the impact assessment community. Itpromulgates a new understanding of SIA. It is intended that this be available to practitionersaround the world. It can provide them with the basis for developing national guidelines inconsultation with a range of stakeholders and users in their own countries.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES for SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTInternational Association for Impact Assessment
Defining and describing Social Impact AssessmentIn general terms, SIA is analysing, monitoring and managing the social consequences of development. However, there are different levels bywhich to understand the term ‘SIA’. SIA is a field of research and practice, or a paradigm consisting of a body of knowledge, techniques, andvalues. Various individuals identify themselves as SIA professionals, or list SIA as one of their disciplines or specialty areas. There is a communityof individuals engaged in research and practice of SIA. These people practice the methodology of SIA and undertake associated social andenvironmental research to inform the practice of SIA. As a methodology or instrument, SIA is the process that SIA professionals follow in orderto assess the social impacts of planned interventions or events, and to develop strategies for the ongoing monitoring and management of thoseimpacts. SIA should not be understood only as the task of predicting social impacts in an impact assessment process.
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT INCLUDES THE PROCESSES OF ANALYSING, MONITORING AND MANAGING THEINTENDED AND UNINTENDED SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES, BOTH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, OF PLANNED INTERVENTIONS(POLICIES, PROGRAMS, PLANS, PROJECTS) AND ANY SOCIAL CHANGE PROCESSES INVOKED BY THOSE INTERVENTIONS.ITS PRIMARY PURPOSE IS TO BRING ABOUT A MORE SUSTAINABLE AND EQUITABLE BIOPHYSICAL AND HUMANENVIRONMENT.
The important features of this understanding of SIA are that:
1. The goal of impact assessment is to bring about a more ecologically, socio-culturally and economically sustainable and equitableenvironment. Impact assessment, therefore, promotes community development and empowerment, builds capacity, and developssocial capital (social networks and trust).
2. The focus of concern of SIA is a proactive stance to development and better development outcomes, not just the identification oramelioration of negative or unintended outcomes. Assisting communities and other stakeholders to identify development goals,and ensuring that positive outcomes are maximised, can be more important than minimising harm from negative impacts.
3. The methodology of SIA can be applied to a wide range of planned interventions, and can be undertaken on behalf of a widerange of actors, and not just within a regulatory framework.
4. SIA contributes to the process of adaptive management of policies, programs, plans and projects, and therefore needs to inform thedesign and operation of the planned intervention.
5. SIA builds on local knowledge and utilises participatory processes to analyse the concerns of interested and affected parties. Itinvolves stakeholders in the assessment of social impacts, the analysis of alternatives, and monitoring of the planned intervention.
6. The good practice of SIA accepts that social, economic and biophysical impacts are inherently and inextricably interconnected.Change in any of these domains will lead to changes in the other domains. SIA must, therefore, develop an understanding of theimpact pathways that are created when change in one domain triggers impacts across other domains, as well as the iterative orflow-on consequences within each domain. In other words, there must be consideration of the second and higher order impactsand of cumulative impacts.
7. In order for the discipline of SIA to learn and grow, there must be analysis of the impacts that occurred as a result of past activities.SIA must be reflexive and evaluative of its theoretical bases and of its practice.
8. While SIA is typically applied to planned interventions, the techniques of SIA can also be used to consider the social impacts thatderive from other types of events, such as disasters, demographic change and epidemics.
SIA is best understood as an umbrella or overarching framework that embodies the evaluation of all impacts on humans and on all the ways inwhich people and communities interact with their socio-cultural, economic and biophysical surroundings. SIA thus has strong links with a widerange of specialist sub-fields involved in the assessment of areas such as: aesthetic impacts (landscape analysis), archaeological and culturalheritage impacts (both tangible and non-tangible), community impacts, cultural impacts, demographic impacts, development impacts, economicand fiscal impacts, gender impacts, health and mental health impacts, impacts on indigenous rights, infrastructural impacts, institutionalimpacts, leisure and tourism impacts, political impacts (human rights, governance, democratisation etc.), poverty, psychological impacts,resource issues (access and ownership of resources), impacts on social and human capital, and other impacts on societies. As such, comprehensiveSIA cannot formally be undertaken by a single person, but requires a team approach.
3INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES for SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
International Association for Impact Assessment
The nature of SIA in an international contextThe objective of SIA is to ensure that development maximises its benefits and minimises its costs, especially those costs borne by people(including those in other places and in the future). Costs and benefits may not be measurable or quantifiable and are often not adequately takeninto account by decision-makers, regulatory authorities and developers. By identifying impacts in advance: (1) better decisions can be madeabout which interventions should proceed and how they should proceed; and (2) mitigation measures can be implemented to minimise theharm and maximise the benefits from a specific planned intervention or related activity.
An important feature of SIA is the professional value system held by its practitioners. In addition to a commitment to sustainability and toscientific integrity, such a value system includes an ethic that advocates openness and accountability, fairness and equity, and defends humanrights. The role of SIA goes far beyond the ex-ante (in advance) prediction of adverse impacts and the determination of who wins and who loses.SIA also encompasses: empowerment of local people; enhancement of the position of women, minority groups and other disadvantaged ormarginalised members of society; development of capacity building; alleviation of all forms of dependency; increase in equity; and a focus onpoverty reduction. SIA complements the economic and technical models that characterise the thinking of many development professionals andagencies.
SIA can be undertaken in different contexts and for different purposes. This creates difficulties in defining or evaluating it. The nature of an SIAdone on behalf of a multinational corporation as part of that company’s internal procedures may be very different to an SIA undertaken by aconsultant in compliance with regulatory or funding agency requirements, or an SIA undertaken by a development agency interested inensuring best value for their country’s development assistance. These, in turn, may be very different to an SIA undertaken by staff or studentsat a local university on behalf of the local community, or an SIA undertaken by the local community itself. Each of these applications of SIA isworthwhile, and none should pretend to be the definitive statement. Evaluation of an SIA needs to consider its intended purpose.
Some conceptualizations of SIA are related to protecting individual property rights, with clear statements of adverse impacts required to ensurethat individual rights are not transgressed. Where these rights are violated, SIA could be seen as contributing to mitigation and compensationmechanisms. In these situations, SIA tends to concentrate on the negative impacts. In other contexts, however, particularly in developingcountries, there should be less emphasis on the negative impacts on small groups of individuals or on individual property rights. Rather, thereshould be greater concern with maximising social utility and development potential, while ensuring that such development is generallyacceptable to the community, equitable and sustainable. SIA should also focus on reconstruction of livelihoods. The improvement of socialwellbeing of the wider community should be explicitly recognized as an objective of planned interventions, and as such should be an indicatorconsidered by any form of assessment. However, awareness of the differential distribution of impacts among different groups in society, andparticularly the impact burden experienced by vulnerable groups in the community should always be of prime concern.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SIA COMPLEMENTS THE ECONOMIC AND TECHNICALMODELS THAT CHARACTERISE THE THINKING OF MANYDEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONALS AND AGENCIES
4INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES for SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTInternational Association for Impact Assessment
What are social impacts?SIA is much more than the prediction step within an environmental assessment framework. Social impacts are much broader than the limitedissues often considered in EIAs (such as demographic changes, job issues, financial security, and impacts on family life). A limited view of SIAcreates demarcation problems about what are the social impacts to be identified by SIA, versus what is considered by related fields such as healthimpact assessment, cultural impact assessment, heritage impact assessment, aesthetic impact assessment, or gender impact assessment. The SIAcommunity of practitioners considers that all issues that affect people, directly or indirectly, are pertinent to social impact assessment.
A convenient way of conceptualising social impacts is as changes to one or more of the following:
• people’s way of life – that is, how they live, work, play and interact with one another on a day-to-day basis;• their culture – that is, their shared beliefs, customs, values and language or dialect;• their community – its cohesion, stability, character, services and facilities;• their political systems – the extent to which people are able to participate in decisions that affect their lives, the level of
democratisation that is taking place, and the resources provided for this purpose;• their environment – the quality of the air and water people use; the availability and quality of the food they eat; the level of hazard
or risk, dust and noise they are exposed to; the adequacy of sanitation, their physical safety, and their access to and control overresources;
• their health and wellbeing – health is a state of complete physical, mental, social and spiritual wellbeing and not merely theabsence of disease or infirmity;
• their personal and property rights – particularly whether people are economically affected, or experience personal disadvantagewhich may include a violation of their civil liberties;
• their fears and aspirations – their perceptions about their safety, their fears about the future of their community, and theiraspirations for their future and the future of their children.
Activities comprising Social Impact AssessmentSIA comprises most of the following activities. It:
• participates in the environmental design of the planned intervention;• identifies interested and affected peoples;• facilitates and coordinates the participation of stakeholders;• documents and analyses the local historical setting of the planned intervention so as to be able to interpret responses to the
intervention, and to assess cumulative impacts;• collects baseline data (social profiling) to allow evaluation and audit of the impact assessment process and the planned intervention
itself;• gives a rich picture of the local cultural context, and develops an understanding of local community values, particularly how they
relate to the planned intervention;• identifies and describes the activities which are likely to cause impacts (scoping);• predicts (or analyses) likely impacts and how different stakeholders are likely to respond;• assists evaluating and selecting alternatives (including a no development option);• assists in site selection;• recommends mitigation measures;• assists in the valuation process and provides suggestions about compensation (non-financial as well as financial);• describes potential conflicts between stakeholders and advises on resolution processes;• develops coping strategies for dealing with residual or non-mitigatable impacts;• contributes to skill development and capacity building in the community;• advises on appropriate institutional and coordination arrangements for all parties;• assists in devising and implementing monitoring and management programs.
5INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES for SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
International Association for Impact Assessment
Guidelines, Principles and Core ValuesI. Core Values: Fundamental, ideal-typical, enduring, statements of belief that are strongly held and accepted as premises (is-statements).
II. Principles: General statements of either a common understanding or an indication as to a course of action about what ought to be done (oughtstatements).
III. Guidelines: Statements by which to plan a specific course of action and which clarify how it should done (action statements).
Guidelines can be described as statements which provide advice or direction by which to plan a specific course of action. They are written asspecific statements of instruction about what to do and/or how to do it. Typically they are “action-statements”. A principle is a macro statementthat provides a general guide to a course of action about what ought to be done. They are written as “ought-statements”. Core values arestatements about fundamental beliefs that are deeply held. They are typically “is-statements”. Values determine principles, from whichguidelines can be written.
I. The core values of SIAThe SIA community of practice believes that:
1. There are fundamental human rights that are shared equally across cultures, and by males and females alike.2. There is a right to have those fundamental human rights protected by the rule of law, with justice applied equally and fairly to all,
and available to all.3. People have a right to live and work in an environment which is conducive to good health and to a good quality of life and which
enables the development of human and social potential.4. Social dimensions of the environment – specifically but not exclusively peace, the quality of social relationships, freedom from fear,
and belongingness – are important aspects of people’s health and quality of life.5. People have a right to be involved in the decision making about the planned interventions that will affect their lives.6. Local knowledge and experience are valuable and can be used to enhance planned interventions.
II(a). Fundamental principles for developmentThe SIA community of practice considers that:
1. Respect for human rights should underpin all actions.2. Promoting equity and democratisation should be the major driver of development planning, and impacts on the worst-off
members of society should be a major consideration in all assessment.3. The existence of diversity between cultures, within cultures, and the diversity of stakeholder interests need to be recognised and
valued.4. Decision making should be just, fair and transparent, and decision makers should be accountable for their decisions.5. Development projects should be broadly acceptable to the members of those communities likely to benefit from, or be affected by,
the planned intervention.6. The opinions and views of experts should not be the sole consideration in decisions about planned interventions.7. The primary focus of all development should be positive outcomes, such as capacity building, empowerment, and the realization
of human and social potential.8. The term, ‘the environment’, should be defined broadly to include social and human dimensions, and in such inclusion, care
must be taken to ensure that adequate attention is given to the realm of the social.
6INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES for SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTInternational Association for Impact Assessment
II(b). Principles specific to SIA practice1. Equity considerations should be a fundamental element of impact assessment and of development planning.2. Many of the social impacts of planned interventions can be predicted.3. Planned interventions can be modified to reduce their negative social impacts and enhance their positive impacts.4. SIA should be an integral part of the development process, involved in all stages from inception to follow-up audit.5. There should be a focus on socially sustainable development, with SIA contributing to the determination of best development
alternative(s) – SIA (and EIA) have more to offer than just being an arbiter between economic benefit and social cost.6. In all planned interventions and their assessments, avenues should be developed to build the social and human capital of local
communities and to strengthen democratic processes.7. In all planned interventions, but especially where there are unavoidable impacts, ways to turn impacted peoples into beneficiaries
should be investigated.8. The SIA must give due consideration to the alternatives of any planned intervention, but especially in cases when there are likely
to be unavoidable impacts.9. Full consideration should be given to the potential mitigation measures of social and environmental impacts, even where impacted
communities may approve the planned intervention and where they may be regarded as beneficiaries.10. Local knowledge and experience and acknowledgment of different local cultural values should be incorporated in any assessment.11. There should be no use of violence, harassment, intimidation or undue force in connection with the assessment or
implementation of a planned intervention.12. Developmental processes that infringe the human rights of any section of society should not be accepted.
II(c). Other guiding principlesThere are many International Agreements and Declarations that contain notable statements. Principle 1 of the 1992 Rio Declaration onEnvironment and Development, for example, states that “Human beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable development. They are entitledto a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature.” Principle 17 calls for impact assessment to be undertaken. Article 1 of the 1986Declaration on the Right to Development states that:
“The right to development is an inalienable human right by virtue of which every human person and all peoples are entitled to participatein, contribute to, and enjoy economic, social, cultural and political development, in which all human rights and fundamental freedoms canbe fully realized. The human right to development also implies the full realization of the right of peoples to self-determination, which includes,subject to the relevant provisions of both International Covenants on Human Rights, the exercise of their inalienable right to full sovereigntyover all their natural wealth and resources.”
In International Agreements and Declarations social issues are often implied but rarely given adequate emphasis. Nevertheless, the statementsthat are given in those Declarations can be rewritten to refer to social issues more specifically. The following is a list of international principles incommon usage rewritten to apply more directly to social issues.
Precautionary Principle: In order to protect the environment, a concept which includes peoples’ ways of life and the integrity of theircommunities, the precautionary approach shall be applied. Where there are threats or potential threats of serious social impact, lack offull certainty about those threats should not be used as a reason for approving the planned intervention or not requiring theimplementation of mitigation measures and stringent monitoring.
Uncertainty Principle: It must be recognised that our knowledge of the social world and of social processes is incomplete and thatsocial knowledge can never be fully complete because the social environment and the processes affecting it are changing constantly,and vary from place to place and over time.
Intragenerational Equity: The benefits from the range of planned interventions should address the needs of all, and the social impactsshould not fall disproportionately on certain groups of the population, in particular children and women, the disabled and the sociallyexcluded, certain generations or certain regions.
7INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES for SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
International Association for Impact Assessment
Intergenerational Equity: Development activities or planned interventions should be managed so that the needs of the presentgeneration are met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Recognition and Preservation of Diversity: Communities and societies are not homogenous. They are demographically structured(age and gender), and they comprise different groups with various value systems and different skills. Special attention is needed toappreciate the existence of the social diversity that exists within communities and to understand what the unique requirements ofspecial groups may be. Care must be taken to ensure that planned interventions do not lead to a loss of social diversity in a communityor a diminishing of social cohesion.
Internalization of Costs. The full social and ecological costs of a planned intervention should be internalised through the use ofeconomic and other instruments, that is, these costs should be considered as part of the costs of the intervention, and no interventionshould be approved or regarded as cost-effective if it achieves this by the creation of hidden costs to current or future generations orthe environment.
The Polluter Pays Principle. The full costs of avoiding or compensating for social impacts should be borne by the proponent of theplanned intervention.
The Prevention Principle. It is generally preferable and cheaper in the long run to prevent negative social impacts and ecologicaldamage from happening than having to restore or rectify damage after the event.
The Protection and Promotion of Health and Safety. Health and safety are paramount. All planned interventions should be assessedfor their health impacts and their accident risks, especially in terms of assessing and managing the risks from hazardous substances,technologies or processes, so that their harmful effects are minimized, including not bringing them into use or phasing them out assoon as possible. Health impacts cover the physical, mental and social wellbeing and safety of all people, paying particular attentionto those groups of the population who are more vulnerable and more likely to be harmed, such as the economically deprived,indigenous groups, children and women, the elderly, the disabled, as well as to the population most exposed to risks arising from theplanned intervention.
The Principle of Multisectoral Integration. Social development requirements and the need to consider social issues should beproperly integrated into all projects, policies, infrastructure programs and other planning activities.
The Principle of Subsidiarity. Decision making power should be decentralised, with accountable decisions being made as close to anindividual citizen as possible. In the context of SIA, this means decisions about the approval of planned interventions, or conditionsunder which they might operate, should be taken as close to the affected people as possible, with local people having an input intothe approval and management processes.
8INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES for SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTInternational Association for Impact Assessment
III. Developing GuidelinesBecause guidelines are specific recommendations for action, they need to be developed in the context in which they are to be applied and theyneed to be addressed to a specific audience. Therefore, they need to be developed in conjunction with the relevant parties. They need to becomeaccepted as the guidelines of that group rather than being imposed.
There are many different groups who are potentially interested in guidelines for SIA. They include:
• SIA practitioners – require guidelines to improve their practice;• Regulatory agencies – require guidelines in order to specify or audit the scope of SIA activities they commission as well as the
quality of SIA reports they receive;• Policy and program developers – require guidelines to ensure that policy and program development considers social impacts;• Affected peoples and NGOs – require guidelines to be able to participate effectively in SIA processes. Local action groups (resident
action groups) and NGOs often act like a regulatory agency in checking the appropriateness of SIA processes.• Developers (proponents) and Financiers – require guidelines to be committed to good practice in environmental and social
impact assessment, to adequately resource such practice, to liaise effectively with practitioners and interested and affected parties,and with regulatory agencies.
• Development agencies (multilateral and bilateral aid organisations) – require guidelines to ensure that the most benefit is obtainedfrom their aid projects, that SIA components are adequately resourced, and that the aid projects themselves do not haveunintended environmental or social consequences.
In addition, various sectors of the community may have special interests, and it may be appropriate for guidelines to be developed to addressthose special interests, such as Indigenous Peoples.
IAIA seeks to liaise with the groups listed above to develop SIA Guidelines applicable to their practice.
IAIA VISIONIAIA is the leading global authority on the best practice in the use of impact assessment for informed decision
making regarding policies, programmes, plans, and projects.
IAIA MISSIONIAIA provides an international forum for advancing innovation and communication of best practice in all
forms of impact assessment to further the development of local, regional and global capacity in impactassessment.
IAIA VALUES• IAIA promotes the application of integrated and participatory approaches to impact assessment,
conducted to the highest professional standards.• IAIA believes the assessment of the environmental, social, economic, cultural and health implications
for proposals to be a critical contribution to sound decision-making processes, and to equitable andsustainable development.
APPENDIX 11
APPENDIX 12
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal March 2003 © IAIA 2003 5
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, volume 21, number 1, March 2003, pages 5–11, Beech Tree Publishing, 10 Watford Close, Guildford, Surrey GU1 2EP, UK
SIA principles
International Principles For Social Impact Assessment
Frank Vanclay
The "International Principles for Social ImpactAssessment" is a statement of the core values ofthe SIA community together with a set of princi-ples to guide SIA practice and the consideration of'the social' in environmental impact assessmentgenerally. It is a discussion document for the im-pact assessment community to be used as the basisfor developing sector and national guidelines. Inthe process of being developed explicitly for an in-ternational context, increasing pressure wasplaced on the conventional understanding of SIAand a new definition, with official imprimatur ofan international professional body, has been for-malised. "Social Impact Assessment includes theprocesses of analysing, monitoring and managingthe intended and unintended social consequences,both positive and negative, of planned interven-tions (policies, programs, plans, projects) and anysocial change processes invoked by thoseinterventions. Its primary purpose is to bringabout a more sustainable and equitable biophysi-cal and human environment."
Keywords: social impact assessment; human rights; core values;principles; guidelines; international conventions; de-velopment; environmental impact assessment
This document was prepared over a five-year period for the IAIA by Frank Vanclay to whom feedback should be provided. Workshops were held at several IAIA and other conferences across six continents. Several hundred people were consulted and some 50 made substantial contributions. Rabel Burdge initi-ated the project, and James Baines and Richard Morgan sup-ported it along the way. The International Principles is a living document that will continue to be modified. Revised versions will be available on the IAIA website (www.iaia.org).
Prof Frank Vanclay is at the Tasmanian Institute of Agricul-tural Research, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 98, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; Tel: +61 3 6226 2618; Fax: +61 3 6226 7450; E-mail: [email protected].
Why have Principles for SIA?
There has been considerable interest in producing “International Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment”. An international document produced under the auspices of a major organisation such as the International Association for Impact As-sessment (IAIA) could:
• Assist in the development of legislation and pol-icy at the national level;
• Provide standards for SIA practice in international contexts (transboundary projects, development cooperation, foreign investments, international banking);
• Increase the appeal of SIA to a wider range of audiences, through increasing its legitimacy/ standing;
• Establish minimum standards for SIA practice; • Provide an articulation of best practice in SIA as a
model to aspire to; • Remove confusion over terminology by establish-
ing a definitive glossary; • Establish the appropriate scope of the social com-
ponent of impact assessments; • Promote the integration of SIA in all impact
assessments (especially environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment).
The process of developing international guidelines and principles however has been difficult. In a truly international context, there are many issues to con-sider and little can be taken for granted. The regula-tory context varies, the cultural/religious context varies, and social and economic priorities for devel-opment vary. As the process of developing inter-national guidelines and principles progressed, increasing pressure was placed on the conventional
International Principles for Social Impact Assessment
6 Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal March 2003
understanding of SIA, and a new concept of what SIA was about emerged. This resulted in a revised definition of SIA.
It also became apparent that a definitive document containing the “International Guidelines and Princi-ples” was a flawed concept. Firstly, because most such documents tend to emphasise guidelines rather than principles. They fail to realise that guidelines need to be deduced from principles, and principles need to be derived from core values. Only by first establishing the core values of the community of practice, then deriving the principles, and only then developing guidelines, can truly appropriate guide-lines emerge. The second flaw is that guidelines and principles are often developed in non-participatory processes. Even where participatory processes are involved, too often they do not include the people to whom the guidelines are directed. These are the people who ultimately need to develop ‘ownership’ of the guidelines if they are to be adopted and be utilised.
This document serves as a discussion document for the impact assessment community. It promul-gates a new understanding of SIA. It is intended that this be available to practitioners around the world. It can provide them with the basis for developing national guidelines in consultation with a range of stakeholders and users in their own countries.
Defining and describing SIA
In general terms, SIA is analysing, monitoring and managing the social consequences of development. However, there are different levels by which to un-derstand the term ‘SIA’. SIA is a field of research and practice, or a paradigm consisting of a body of knowledge, techniques, and values. Various indi-viduals identify themselves as SIA professionals, or list SIA as one of their disciplines or specialty areas. There is a community of individuals engaged in re-search and practice of SIA. These people practice the methodology of SIA and undertake associated social and environmental research to inform the practice of SIA. As a methodology or instrument, SIA is the process that SIA professionals follow in order to assess the social impacts of planned inter-ventions or events, and to develop strategies for the ongoing monitoring and management of those im-pacts. SIA should not be understood only as the task
of predicting social impacts in an impact assessment process.
Social Impact Assessment includes the processes of analysing, monitoring and managing the intended and unintended social consequences, both positive and negative, of planned interventions (policies, programs, plans, projects) and any social change processes invoked by those interventions. Its pri-mary purpose is to bring about a more sustainable and equitable biophysical and human environment.
The important features of this understanding of SIA are that:
1. The goal of impact assessment is to bring about a more ecologically, socio-culturally and economi-cally sustainable and equitable environment. Im-pact assessment, therefore, promotes community development and empowerment, builds capacity, and develops social capital (social networks and trust).
2. The focus of concern of SIA is a proactive stance to development and better development outcomes, not just the identification or amelioration of nega-tive or unintended outcomes. Assisting commu-nities and other stakeholders to identify development goals, and ensuring that positive outcomes are maximised, can be more important than minimising harm from negative impacts.
3. The methodology of SIA can be applied to a wide range of planned interventions, and can be under-taken on behalf of a wide range of actors, and not just within a regulatory framework.
4. SIA contributes to the process of adaptive man-agement of policies, programs, plans and projects, and therefore needs to inform the design and operation of the planned intervention.
5. SIA builds on local knowledge and utilises par-ticipatory processes to analyse the concerns of interested and affected parties. It involves stake-holders in the assessment of social impacts, the analysis of alternatives, and monitoring of the planned intervention.
6. The good practice of SIA accepts that social, eco-nomic and biophysical impacts are inherently and inextricably interconnected. Change in any of these domains will lead to changes in the other domains. SIA must, therefore, develop an under-standing of the impact pathways that are created when change in one domain triggers impacts across other domains, as well as the iterative or flow-on consequences within each domain. In other words, there must be consideration of the second and higher order impacts and of cumula-tive impacts.
7. In order for the discipline of SIA to learn and grow, there must be analysis of the impacts that occurred as a result of past activities. SIA must be reflexive and evaluative of its theoretical bases and of its practice.
8. While SIA is typically applied to planned inter-ventions, the techniques of SIA can also be used
Social Impact Assessment is analysing, monitoring and managing the social consequences of development
International Principles for Social Impact Assessment
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal March 2003 7
to consider the social impacts that derive from other types of events, such as disasters, demo-graphic change and epidemics.
SIA is best understood as an umbrella or overarchingframework that embodies the evaluation of all im-pacts on humans and on all the ways in which peopleand communities interact with their socio-cultural,economic and biophysical surroundings. SIA thus hasstrong links with a wide range of specialist sub-fieldsinvolved in the assessment of areas such as: aestheticimpacts (landscape analysis); archaeological and cul-tural heritage impacts (both tangible and non-tangible); community impacts; cultural impacts;demographic impacts; development impacts; eco-nomic and fiscal impacts; gender impacts; health andmental health impacts; impacts on indigenous rights;infrastructural impacts, institutional impacts; leisureand tourism impacts; political impacts (human rights,governance, democratisation etc); poverty; psycho-logical impacts; resource issues (access and owner-ship of resources); impacts on social and humancapital; and other impacts on societies. As such, com-prehensive SIA cannot normally be undertaken by asingle person, but requires a team approach.
The nature of SIA in an international context
The objective of SIA is to ensure that development maximises its benefits and minimises its costs, espe-cially those costs borne by people (including those in other places and in the future). Costs and benefits may not be measurable or quantifiable and are often not adequately taken into account by decision-makers, regulatory authorities and developers. By identifying impacts in advance: (1) better decisions can be made about which interventions should pro-ceed and how they should proceed; and (2) mitiga-tion measures can be implemented to minimise the harm and maximise the benefits from a specific planned intervention or related activity.
An important feature of SIA is the professional value system held by its practitioners. In addition to a commitment to sustainability and to scientific in-tegrity, such a value system includes an ethic that advocates openness and accountability, fairness and equity, and defends human rights. The role of SIA goes far beyond the ex-ante (in advance) prediction of adverse impacts and the determination of who wins and who loses. SIA also encompasses: empow-erment of local people; enhancement of the position of women, minority groups and other disadvantaged or marginalised members of society; development of capacity building; alleviation of all forms of depend-ency; increase in equity; and a focus on poverty re-duction. SIA complements the economic and technical models that characterise the thinking of many development professionals and agencies.
SIA can be undertaken in different contexts and for different purposes. This creates difficulties in
defining or evaluating it. The nature of an SIA done on behalf of a multinational corporation as part of that company’s internal procedures may be very dif-ferent to an SIA undertaken by a consultant in com-pliance with regulatory or funding agency requirements, or an SIA undertaken by a develop-ment agency interested in ensuring best value for their country’s development assistance. These, in turn, may be very different to an SIA undertaken by staff or students at a local university on behalf of the local community, or an SIA undertaken by the local community itself. Each of these applications of SIA is worthwhile, and none should pretend to be the de-finitive statement. Evaluation of an SIA needs to consider its intended purpose.
Some conceptualisations of SIA are related to protecting individual property rights, with clear statements of adverse impacts required to ensure that individual rights are not transgressed. Where these rights are violated, SIA could be seen as contributing to mitigation and compensation mechanisms. In these situations, SIA tends to concentrate on the negative impacts. In other contexts, however, par-ticularly in developing countries, there should be less emphasis on the negative impacts on small groups of individuals or on individual property rights. Rather, there should be greater concern with maximising social utility and development potential, while ensuring that such development is generally acceptable to the community, equitable and sustain-able. SIA should also focus on reconstruction of livelihoods. The improvement of social wellbeing of the wider community should be explicitly recog-nised as an objective of planned interventions, and as such should be an indicator considered by any form of assessment. However, awareness of the dif-ferential distribution of impacts among different groups in society, and particularly the impact burden experienced by vulnerable groups in the community should always be of prime concern.
What are social impacts?
SIA is much more than the prediction step within an environmental assessment framework. Social im-pacts are much broader than the limited issues often
Awareness of the differential distribution of impacts among different groups in society, and particularly the impact burden experienced by vulnerable groups in the community should always be of prime concern
International Principles for Social Impact Assessment
8 Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal March 2003
considered in EIAs (such as demographic changes, job issues, financial security, and impacts on family life). A limited view of SIA creates demarcation problems about what are the social impacts to be identified by SIA, versus what is considered by re-lated fields such as health impact assessment, cul-tural impact assessment, heritage impact assessment, aesthetic impact assessment, or gender impact assessment. The SIA community of practitioners considers that all issues that affect people, directly or indirectly, are pertinent to social impact assessment.
A convenient way of conceptualising social im-pacts is as changes to one or more of the following:
• people’s way of life – that is, how they live, work, play and interact with one another on a day-to-day basis;
• their culture – that is, their shared beliefs, cus-toms, values and language or dialect;
• their community – its cohesion, stability, charac-ter, services and facilities;
• their political systems – the extent to which peopleare able to participate in decisions that affect theirlives, the level of democratisation that is takingplace, and the resources provided for this purpose;
• their environment – the quality of the air and wa-ter people use; the availability and quality of the food they eat; the level of hazard or risk, dust and noise they are exposed to; the adequacy of sanita-tion, their physical safety, and their access to and control over resources;
• their health and wellbeing – health is a state of complete physical, mental, social and spiritual wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity;
• their personal and property rights – particularly whether people are economically affected, or ex-perience personal disadvantage which may in-clude a violation of their civil liberties;
• their fears and aspirations – their perceptions about their safety, their fears about the future of their community, and their aspirations for their fu-ture and the future of their children.
Activities comprising SIA
SIA comprises most of the following activities. It:
• participates in the environmental design of the planned intervention;
• identifies interested and affected peoples; • facilitates and coordinates the participation of
stakeholders; • documents and analyses the local historical setting
of the planned intervention so as to be able to interpret responses to the intervention, and to assess cumulative impacts;
• collects baseline data (social profiling) to allow evaluation and audit of the impact assessment process and the planned intervention itself;
• gives a rich picture of the local cultural context, and develops an understanding of local commu-nity values, particularly how they relate to the planned intervention;
• identifies and describes the activities which are likely to cause impacts (scoping);
• predicts (or analyses) likely impacts and how dif-ferent stakeholders are likely to respond;
• assists evaluating and selecting alternatives (in-cluding a no development option);
• assists in site selection; • recommends mitigation measures; • assists in the valuation process and provides sug-
gestions about compensation (non-financial as well as financial);
• describes potential conflicts between stakeholders and advises on resolution processes;
• develops coping strategies for dealing with resid-ual or non-mitigatable impacts;
• contributes to skill development and capacity building in the community;
• advises on appropriate institutional and coordina-tion arrangements for all parties;
• assists in devising and implementing monitoring and management programs.
Guidelines, Principles and Core Values
Core Values are fundamental, ideal-typical, endur-ing, statements of belief that are strongly held and accepted as premises (is-statements).
Principles are general statements of either a common understanding or an indication as to a course of ac-tion about what ought to be done (ought-statements).
Guidelines are statements by which to plan a spe-cific course of action and which clarify how it should done (action-statements).
Guidelines can be described as statements which provide advice or direction by which to plan a spe-cific course of action. They are written as specific statements of instruction about what to do and/or how to do it. Typically they are “action-statements”. A principle is a macro statement that provides a gen-eral guide to a course of action about what ought to be done. They are written as “ought-statements”. Core values are statements about fundamental be-liefs that are deeply held. They are typically “is-statements”. Values determine principles, from which guidelines can be written.
All issues that affect people, directly or indirectly, are pertinent to SIA
International Principles for Social Impact Assessment
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal March 2003 9
Core Values
The core values of SIA are:
The SIA community of practice believes that:
1. There are fundamental human rights that are shared equally across cultures, and by males and females alike.
2. There is a right to have those fundamental human rights protected by the rule of law, with justice applied equally and fairly to all, and available to all.
3. People have a right to live and work in an envi-ronment which is conducive to good health and to a good quality of life and which enables the development of human and social potential.
4. Social dimensions of the environment – specifi-cally but not exclusively peace, the quality of social relationships, freedom from fear, and belongingness – are important aspects of people’s health and quality of life.
5. People have a right to be involved in the decision making about the planned interventions that will affect their lives.
6. Local knowledge and experience are valuable andcan be used to enhance planned interventions.
Fundamental principles for development:
The SIA community of practice considers that:
1. Respect for human rights should underpin all actions.
2. Promoting equity and democratisation shouldbe the major driver of development planning,and impacts on the worst-off members of so- ciety should be a major consideration in allassessment.
3. The existence of diversity between cultures, within cultures, and the diversity of stakeholder interests need to be recognised and valued.
4. Decision making should be just, fair and transparent, and decision makers should be ac-countable for their decisions.
5. Development projects should be broadly accept-able to the members of those communities likely to benefit from, or be affected by, the planned intervention.
6. The opinions and views of experts should not be the sole consideration in decisions about planned interventions.
7. The primary focus of all development should be positive outcomes, such as capacity building, empowerment, and the realisation of human and social potential.
8. The term, ‘the environment’, should be defined broadly to include social and human dimensions, and in such inclusion, care must be taken to en-sure that adequate attention is given to the realm of the social.
Principles specific to SIA practice
1. Equity considerations should be a fundamental element of impact assessment and of develop-ment planning.
2. Many of the social impacts of planned interven-tions can be predicted.
3. Planned interventions can be modified to reduce their negative social impacts and enhance their positive impacts.
4. SIA should be an integral part of the devel-opment process, involved in all stages from inception to follow-up audit.
5. There should be a focus on socially sustainabledevelopment, with SIA contributing to the deter-mination of best development alternative(s) – SIA(and EIA) have more to offer than just being anarbiter between economic benefit and social cost.
6. In all planned interventions and their assess-ments, avenues should be developed to build the social and human capital of local communities and to strengthen democratic processes.
7. In all planned interventions, but especially where there are unavoidable impacts, ways to turn im-pacted peoples into beneficiaries should be investigated.
8. The SIA must give due consideration to the alternatives of any planned intervention, but especially in cases when there are likely to be unavoidable impacts.
9. Full consideration should be given to the potentialmitigation measures of social and environmentalimpacts, even where impacted communities mayapprove the planned intervention and where theymay be regarded as beneficiaries.
10. Local knowledge and experience and acknowl-edgment of different local cultural values should be incorporated in any assessment.
11. There should be no use of violence, harassment, intimidation or undue force in connection with the assessment or implementation of a planned intervention.
12. Developmental processes that infringe the human rights of any section of society should not be accepted.
Other guiding principles
There are many International Agreements and Dec-larations that contain notable statements. Principle 1 of the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, for example, states that “Human be-ings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable de-velopment. They are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature.” Principle 17 calls for impact assessment to be undertaken. Ar-ticle 1 of the 1986 Declaration on the Right to Development states that “The right to development is an inalienable human right by virtue of which every human person and all peoples are entitled to participate in, contribute to, and enjoy economic,
International Principles for Social Impact Assessment
10 Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal March 2003
social, cultural and political development, in which all human rights and fundamental freedoms can be fully realised. The human right to development also implies the full realization of the right of peoples to self-determination, which includes, subject to the relevant provisions of both International Covenants on Human Rights, the exercise of their inalienable right to full sovereignty over all their natural wealth and resources.”
In international agreements and declarations, social issues are often implied but rarely given adequate emphasis. Nevertheless, the statements that are given in those declarations can be rewritten to refer to social issues more specifically. The following is a list of international principles in common usage re-written to apply more directly to social issues.
Precautionary Principle: In order to protect the envi-ronment, a concept which includes peoples’ ways of life and the integrity of their communities, the pre-cautionary approach shall be applied. Where there are threats or potential threats of serious social im-pact, lack of full certainty about those threats should not be used as a reason for approving the planned intervention or not requiring the implementation of mitigation measures and stringent monitoring.
Uncertainty Principle: It must be recognised that ourknowledge of the social world and of social processesis incomplete and that social knowledge can never befully complete because the social environment and theprocesses affecting it are changing constantly, andvary from place to place and over time.
Intragenerational Equity: The benefits from the range of planned interventions should address the needs of all, and the social impacts should not fall disproportionately on certain groups of the popula-tion, in particular children and women, the disabled and the socially excluded, certain generations or cer-tain regions.
Intergenerational Equity: Development activities or planned interventions should be managed so that the needs of the present generation are met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Recognition and Preservation of Diversity: Commu-nities and societies are not homogenous. They are
demographically structured (age and gender), andthey comprise different groups with various valuesystems and different skills. Special attention isneeded to appreciate the existence of the social diver-sity that exists within communities and to understandwhat the unique requirements of special groups maybe. Care must be taken to ensure that planned inter-ventions do not lead to a loss of social diversity in acommunity or a diminishing of social cohesion.
Internalisation of Costs. The full social and ecologicalcosts of a planned intervention should be internalisedthrough the use of economic and other instruments,that is, these costs should be considered as part of thecosts of the intervention, and no intervention shouldbe approved or regarded as cost-effective if itachieves this by the creation of hidden costs to currentor future generations or the environment.
The Polluter Pays Principle. The full costs of avoid-ing or compensating for social impacts should be borne by the proponent of the planned intervention.
The Prevention Principle. It is generally preferable and cheaper in the long run to prevent negative so-cial impacts and ecological damage from happening than having to restore or rectify damage after the event.
The Protection and Promotion of Health and Safety. Health and safety are paramount. All planned inter-ventions should be assessed for their health impacts and their accident risks, especially in terms of as-sessing and managing the risks from hazardous sub-stances, technologies or processes, so that their harmful effects are minimised, including not bring-ing them into use or phasing them out as soon as possible. Health impacts cover the physical, mental and social wellbeing and safety of all people, paying particular attention to those groups of the population who are more vulnerable and more likely to be harmed, such as the economically deprived, indige-nous groups, children and women, the elderly, the disabled, as well as to the population most exposed to risks arising from the planned intervention.
The Principle of Multisectoral Integration. Social development requirements and the need to consider social issues should be properly integrated into all projects, policies, infrastructure programs and other planning activities.
The Principle of Subsidiarity. Decision making power should be decentralised, with accountable decisions being made as close to an individual citizen as possible. In the context of SIA, this means decisions about the approval of planned interven-tions, or conditions under which they might operate, should be taken as close to the affected people as possible, with local people having an input into the approval and management processes.
Human beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable development (Principle 1 of the Rio Declaration)
International Principles for Social Impact Assessment
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal March 2003 11
Developing Guidelines
Because guidelines are specific recommendations for action, they need to be developed in the context in which they are to be applied and they need to be addressed to a specific audience. Therefore, they need to be developed in conjunction with the rele-vant parties. They need to become accepted as the guidelines of that group rather than being imposed.
There are many different groups who are poten-tially interested in guidelines for SIA. They include:
• SIA practitioners – require guidelines to improve their practice;
• Regulatory agencies – require guidelines in order to specify or audit the scope of SIA activities they commission as well as the quality of SIA reports they receive;
• Policy and program developers – require guidelines to ensure that policy and program dev-elopment considers social impacts;
• Affected peoples and NGOs – require guidelines to be able to participate effectively in SIA pro-cesses. Local action groups (resident action groups) and NGOs often act like a regulatory agency in checking the appropriateness of SIA processes.
• Developers (proponents) and Financiers – require guidelines to be committed to good practice in environmental and social impact assessment, to adequately resource such practice, to liaise effectively with practitioners and interested and affected parties, and with regulatory agencies.
• Development agencies (multilateral and bilateral aid organisations) – require guidelines to ensure that the most benefit is obtained from their aid projects, that SIA components are adequately re-sourced, and that the aid projects themselves do not have unintended environmental or social consequences.
In addition, various sectors of the community may have special interests, and it may be appropriate for guidelines to be developed to address those special interests, such as Indigenous Peoples.
IAIA seeks to liaise with the groups listed above to develop SIA Guidelines applicable to their practice.
Project Team
The Project Team has at various times included the following: Frank Vanclay (chair), James Baines, Hobson Bryan, Di Buchan, Rabel Burdge, Gary Cox, Allan Dale, Amber Frugte, Stewart Lockie, Abdoulaye Sene, Pierre Senecal, Roel Slootweg and Nick Taylor. Many other people participated in workshops and gave comments.
IAIA seeks to liaise with sector groups to develop SIA Guidelines applicable to their practice
12 Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal March 2003
International Association for Impact AssessmentValues, vision and mission
Values
IAIA promotes the application of integrated and participatory approaches to impact assess- ment, conducted to the highest professional standards.
IAIA believes the assessment of the environmental, social, economic, cultural and health implications for proposals to be a critical contribution to sound decision-making processes, and to equitable and sustainable development.
Vision
IAIA is the leading global authority on the best practice in the use of impact assessment for informed decision making regarding policies, programmes, plans, and projects.
Mission
IAIA provides an international forum for advancing innovation and communication of best practice in all forms of impact assessment to further the development of local, regional and global capacity in impact assessment.
APPENDIX 13
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
DA
TA
SE
T_T
ITL
EB
enef
its D
ata:
Sum
mar
y S
tatis
tics,
200
7T
OA
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7
AR
EA
_TY
PE
Sup
er O
utpu
t Are
a Lo
wer
Lay
erH
EA
DIN
G
Dis
abili
ty L
ivin
g A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Tot
al
Dis
abili
ty L
ivin
g A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Mal
e
Dis
abili
ty L
ivin
g A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; F
emal
e
Dis
abili
ty L
ivin
g A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d U
nder
16
Dis
abili
ty L
ivin
g A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 16
-24
Dis
abili
ty L
ivin
g A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 25
-49
Dis
abili
ty L
ivin
g A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 50
-59
Dis
abili
ty L
ivin
g A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 60
-69
Dis
abili
ty L
ivin
g A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 70
and
Ove
r
Inca
paci
ty
Ben
efit/
Sev
ere
Dis
able
men
t A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Tot
al
Inca
paci
ty
Ben
efit/
Sev
ere
Dis
able
men
t A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Mal
e
Inca
paci
ty
Ben
efit/
Sev
ere
Dis
able
men
t A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; F
emal
e
Inca
paci
ty
Ben
efit/
Sev
ere
Dis
able
men
t A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 16
-24
Inca
paci
ty
Ben
efit/
Sev
ere
Dis
able
men
t A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 25
-49
Inca
paci
ty
Ben
efit/
Sev
ere
Dis
able
men
t A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 50
-59
Inca
paci
ty
Ben
efit/
Sev
ere
Dis
able
men
t A
llow
ance
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 60
and
Ove
rIn
com
e S
uppo
rt
Cla
iman
ts; T
otal
Inco
me
Sup
port
C
laim
ants
; Mal
e
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T_U
NIT
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
ST
AT
IST
ICA
L_U
NIT
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
LS
OA
_CO
DE
LS
OA
_NA
ME
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
E01
0123
67H
alto
n 00
7A17
080
905
535
4045
4015
010
050
1070
5020
140
55
E01
0123
68H
alto
n 00
3A14
575
705
525
2050
4011
065
455
5040
1575
30
E01
0123
69H
alto
n 00
5A13
065
655
535
3030
2512
075
4510
5540
1570
25
E01
0123
70H
alto
n 00
7B13
570
6515
520
2545
2510
060
4010
4035
1580
20
E01
0123
71H
alto
n 01
6A80
3545
55
1525
2010
5525
305
2025
520
10
E01
0123
72H
alto
n 01
6B65
2540
05
1510
305
5025
255
1520
1010
5
E01
0123
73H
alto
n 01
6C75
3540
55
1015
3010
4525
205
1020
1010
5
E01
0123
74H
alto
n 00
2A80
3545
100
1025
2510
6540
255
2025
1515
5
E01
0123
75H
alto
n 00
2B40
2020
55
105
150
4025
155
1510
1010
5
E01
0123
76H
alto
n 00
2C45
2520
55
1510
55
3515
205
1515
05
5
E01
0123
77H
alto
n 00
4A18
090
905
040
4055
4016
095
6510
7550
2590
35
E01
0123
78H
alto
n 00
6A10
545
605
520
2030
2575
4035
520
3515
2010
E01
0123
79H
alto
n 00
6B13
570
655
1040
2040
2011
060
505
6030
1575
25
E01
0123
80H
alto
n 00
6C15
085
6515
1035
2535
3013
585
5010
7040
1512
040
E01
0123
81H
alto
n 01
0A20
510
510
010
1065
4555
2025
016
090
3013
065
2522
090
E01
0123
82H
alto
n 01
0B21
511
010
515
1065
5050
2522
012
595
1011
080
2018
580
E01
0123
83H
alto
n 01
3A21
595
120
1015
5540
6035
185
100
8515
8555
3010
045
E01
0123
84H
alto
n 01
0C21
512
590
510
5060
5535
185
120
6515
7070
3010
045
E01
0123
85H
alto
n 00
9A40
2020
50
1010
105
3520
155
1510
510
5
E01
0123
86H
alto
n 00
9B40
2020
105
1010
50
3010
205
1015
010
0
E01
0123
87H
alto
n 00
9C60
3030
55
55
2515
3020
105
515
510
0
E01
0123
88H
alto
n 00
6D15
570
855
545
3040
3014
080
6010
7545
1013
040
E01
0123
89H
alto
n 00
8A11
055
555
515
2045
2070
4030
520
3015
105
E01
0123
90H
alto
n 00
4B17
595
805
530
3055
5011
060
500
5045
1560
25
E01
0123
91H
alto
n 00
8B17
075
955
535
4045
4016
085
7510
7055
2512
045
E01
0123
92H
alto
n 00
1A70
4030
155
1510
1510
5535
205
2515
1015
5
E01
0123
93H
alto
n 00
1B75
4530
50
1015
2520
6040
200
2025
1515
5
E01
0123
94H
alto
n 00
5B13
060
7010
1030
1535
3010
055
455
4030
2570
25
E01
0123
95H
alto
n 00
1C75
4035
05
1015
2520
5525
300
1525
155
0
E01
0123
96H
alto
n 01
3B19
085
105
1010
4035
6035
135
7560
1065
4020
130
45
E01
0123
97H
alto
n 01
3C16
085
755
050
3545
2516
095
655
8545
2517
045
E01
0123
98H
alto
n 01
1A80
4040
55
1015
3015
5030
205
1520
1025
10
E01
0123
99H
alto
n 01
3D15
580
7510
1035
2040
4011
065
455
5535
1510
030
E01
0124
00H
alto
n 01
1B80
3545
105
2020
1510
6535
305
2530
530
10
E01
0124
01H
alto
n 00
8C14
570
7510
530
3040
3010
055
450
3545
2040
15
E01
0124
02H
alto
n 01
1C15
575
8010
535
3540
3015
085
6510
6060
2012
040
E01
0124
03H
alto
n 01
3E21
511
510
015
1555
5055
2519
010
585
1590
6520
190
70
E01
0124
04H
alto
n 01
1D11
055
5510
525
2530
1585
5035
1035
2515
5520
E01
0124
05H
alto
n 01
1E16
070
9015
540
4035
2512
565
600
5555
1575
25
E01
0124
06H
alto
n 01
5A19
090
100
1010
4045
5035
140
8060
1055
5520
115
40
E01
0124
07H
alto
n 01
5B20
010
595
155
6040
5030
215
115
100
1011
570
2017
565
E01
0124
08H
alto
n 01
3F26
011
514
520
1570
6045
5024
012
511
510
125
8025
245
70
E01
0124
09H
alto
n 01
5C17
080
9010
530
3060
3512
065
555
4550
2085
25
E01
0124
10H
alto
n 00
3B50
1535
50
1015
155
5525
305
2020
1015
5
E01
0124
11H
alto
n 00
1D11
565
500
525
1545
2585
5530
1035
2020
4020
E01
0124
12H
alto
n 00
3C17
010
070
55
4530
5035
145
100
455
6545
3090
45
E01
0124
13H
alto
n 00
3D15
570
8510
030
3055
3012
570
555
5045
2575
25
E01
0124
14H
alto
n 00
3E80
3050
50
1515
2520
5530
250
1525
1515
5
E01
0124
15H
alto
n 01
6D60
3030
50
1520
1010
4525
200
1520
1010
5
E01
0124
16H
alto
n 01
2A90
4545
105
2015
2020
7045
255
2530
1040
20
E01
0124
17H
alto
n 01
2B85
4045
105
2515
1515
7035
350
4025
545
15
E01
0124
18H
alto
n 01
6E75
3045
05
1510
2520
4520
250
1520
1015
10
E01
0124
19H
alto
n 00
4C12
555
7010
1025
3040
1013
070
6015
5050
1511
035
E01
0124
20H
alto
n 00
4D20
510
010
510
545
3565
4516
590
755
9050
2013
045
E01
0124
21H
alto
n 00
2D60
2040
50
1515
1510
4520
255
1520
520
10
E01
0124
22H
alto
n 00
4E15
075
7520
535
3035
2515
085
6510
7550
1513
040
E01
0124
23H
alto
n 00
2E90
4050
55
1510
3520
6040
200
2025
1520
10
E01
0124
24H
alto
n 00
7C24
012
511
520
1560
5560
3022
012
010
015
105
7525
235
70
E01
0124
25H
alto
n 00
5C16
075
855
530
4045
3513
575
605
5555
2010
535
E01
0124
26H
alto
n 00
5D65
3035
05
1510
2015
6035
255
2520
1015
5
E01
0124
27H
alto
n 00
5E13
055
7510
525
2540
2595
5540
540
4010
7025
E01
0124
28H
alto
n 01
2C12
560
6510
1035
2530
1510
060
4010
4030
2060
15
E01
0124
29H
alto
n 01
2D10
555
505
025
1535
2570
4525
535
2010
6015
E01
0124
30H
alto
n 01
2E15
575
805
535
4045
2514
575
7010
7555
515
555
E01
0124
31H
alto
n 01
2F12
560
6510
540
2530
1512
570
5510
6540
1011
545
E01
0124
32H
alto
n 01
4A13
065
6510
530
3525
2595
4550
535
4510
7525
E01
0124
33H
alto
n 01
4B15
580
7510
545
4530
2015
575
8010
7060
1514
540
E01
0124
34H
alto
n 00
9D95
5540
50
2025
3015
8045
355
2535
1520
10
E01
0124
35H
alto
n 00
9E80
3545
55
2530
150
7035
350
3030
1020
10
E01
0124
36H
alto
n 01
4C10
550
5525
020
2530
595
4055
1045
355
140
35
E01
0124
37H
alto
n 01
5D13
570
6510
1040
2535
1511
565
505
5535
2012
525
E01
0124
38H
alto
n 01
4D14
560
8510
535
3540
2012
555
700
5550
2012
030
E01
0124
39H
alto
n 01
5E18
090
9010
550
4040
3513
060
705
6060
512
530
E01
0124
40H
alto
n 01
4E90
4545
100
2525
2010
8040
400
3040
1030
15
E01
0124
41H
alto
n 00
7D21
511
010
525
560
4555
2525
014
510
510
130
7040
215
60
E01
0124
42H
alto
n 00
6E14
075
6515
530
3525
3014
580
6515
7045
1514
045
E01
0124
43H
alto
n 00
8D11
545
7010
1025
2035
1510
045
555
4035
2055
20
E01
0124
44H
alto
n 01
0D18
595
9020
1540
3560
1514
075
6510
6045
2516
545
E01
0124
45H
alto
n 01
0E21
510
511
020
550
5560
2517
010
070
1080
6515
165
60
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
DA
TA
SE
T_T
ITL
EB
enef
its D
ata:
Sum
mar
y S
tatis
tics,
200
7T
O
AR
EA
_TY
PE
Sup
er O
utpu
t Are
a Lo
wer
Lay
erH
EA
DIN
G
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T_U
NIT
ST
AT
IST
ICA
L_U
NIT
LS
OA
_CO
DE
LS
OA
_NA
ME
E01
0123
67H
alto
n 00
7A
E01
0123
68H
alto
n 00
3A
E01
0123
69H
alto
n 00
5A
E01
0123
70H
alto
n 00
7B
E01
0123
71H
alto
n 01
6A
E01
0123
72H
alto
n 01
6B
E01
0123
73H
alto
n 01
6C
E01
0123
74H
alto
n 00
2A
E01
0123
75H
alto
n 00
2B
E01
0123
76H
alto
n 00
2C
E01
0123
77H
alto
n 00
4A
E01
0123
78H
alto
n 00
6A
E01
0123
79H
alto
n 00
6B
E01
0123
80H
alto
n 00
6C
E01
0123
81H
alto
n 01
0A
E01
0123
82H
alto
n 01
0B
E01
0123
83H
alto
n 01
3A
E01
0123
84H
alto
n 01
0C
E01
0123
85H
alto
n 00
9A
E01
0123
86H
alto
n 00
9B
E01
0123
87H
alto
n 00
9C
E01
0123
88H
alto
n 00
6D
E01
0123
89H
alto
n 00
8A
E01
0123
90H
alto
n 00
4B
E01
0123
91H
alto
n 00
8B
E01
0123
92H
alto
n 00
1A
E01
0123
93H
alto
n 00
1B
E01
0123
94H
alto
n 00
5B
E01
0123
95H
alto
n 00
1C
E01
0123
96H
alto
n 01
3B
E01
0123
97H
alto
n 01
3C
E01
0123
98H
alto
n 01
1A
E01
0123
99H
alto
n 01
3D
E01
0124
00H
alto
n 01
1B
E01
0124
01H
alto
n 00
8C
E01
0124
02H
alto
n 01
1C
E01
0124
03H
alto
n 01
3E
E01
0124
04H
alto
n 01
1D
E01
0124
05H
alto
n 01
1E
E01
0124
06H
alto
n 01
5A
E01
0124
07H
alto
n 01
5B
E01
0124
08H
alto
n 01
3F
E01
0124
09H
alto
n 01
5C
E01
0124
10H
alto
n 00
3B
E01
0124
11H
alto
n 00
1D
E01
0124
12H
alto
n 00
3C
E01
0124
13H
alto
n 00
3D
E01
0124
14H
alto
n 00
3E
E01
0124
15H
alto
n 01
6D
E01
0124
16H
alto
n 01
2A
E01
0124
17H
alto
n 01
2B
E01
0124
18H
alto
n 01
6E
E01
0124
19H
alto
n 00
4C
E01
0124
20H
alto
n 00
4D
E01
0124
21H
alto
n 00
2D
E01
0124
22H
alto
n 00
4E
E01
0124
23H
alto
n 00
2E
E01
0124
24H
alto
n 00
7C
E01
0124
25H
alto
n 00
5C
E01
0124
26H
alto
n 00
5D
E01
0124
27H
alto
n 00
5E
E01
0124
28H
alto
n 01
2C
E01
0124
29H
alto
n 01
2D
E01
0124
30H
alto
n 01
2E
E01
0124
31H
alto
n 01
2F
E01
0124
32H
alto
n 01
4A
E01
0124
33H
alto
n 01
4B
E01
0124
34H
alto
n 00
9D
E01
0124
35H
alto
n 00
9E
E01
0124
36H
alto
n 01
4C
E01
0124
37H
alto
n 01
5D
E01
0124
38H
alto
n 01
4D
E01
0124
39H
alto
n 01
5E
E01
0124
40H
alto
n 01
4E
E01
0124
41H
alto
n 00
7D
E01
0124
42H
alto
n 00
6E
E01
0124
43H
alto
n 00
8D
E01
0124
44H
alto
n 01
0D
E01
0124
45H
alto
n 01
0E
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7A
ug-2
007
Aug
-200
7
Inco
me
Sup
port
C
laim
ants
; F
emal
e
Inco
me
Sup
port
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 16
-24
Inco
me
Sup
port
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 25
-49
Inco
me
Sup
port
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 50
-59
Inco
me
Sup
port
C
laim
ants
; Age
d 60
and
Ove
r
Jobs
eeke
rs
Allo
wan
ce
Cla
iman
ts; T
otal
Jobs
eeke
rs
Allo
wan
ce
Cla
iman
ts; M
ale
Jobs
eeke
rs
Allo
wan
ce
Cla
iman
ts;
Fem
ale
Jobs
eeke
rs
Allo
wan
ce
Cla
iman
ts; A
ged
16-2
4
Jobs
eeke
rs
Allo
wan
ce
Cla
iman
ts; A
ged
25-4
9
Jobs
eeke
rs
Allo
wan
ce
Cla
iman
ts; A
ged
50 a
nd O
ver
Pen
sion
Cre
dit
Cla
iman
ts; T
otal
Pen
sion
Cre
dit
Cla
iman
ts; M
ale
Pen
sion
Cre
dit
Cla
iman
ts;
Fem
ale
Pen
sion
Cre
dit
Cla
iman
ts; A
ged
60-6
9
Pen
sion
Cre
dit
Cla
iman
ts; A
ged
70-7
9
Pen
sion
Cre
dit
Cla
iman
ts; A
ged
80 a
nd O
ver
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
nt
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
E
8515
9035
035
2510
1020
516
080
8060
5545
4510
4520
025
205
1010
517
565
110
4565
65
455
5015
030
2010
1015
590
4050
3535
20
6020
4515
035
2510
1520
090
2565
2030
40
100
155
015
105
010
520
515
55
10
50
55
010
55
55
010
010
05
5
55
50
015
105
55
520
1010
1010
0
100
105
020
1010
1010
025
520
55
15
55
50
010
55
55
010
010
05
5
00
50
015
105
55
510
010
010
0
5510
6515
040
3010
1520
585
3550
4030
15
100
155
025
205
515
550
2030
1520
15
5015
5010
025
205
1015
075
3045
3525
15
8020
8020
025
205
1010
512
540
8545
4535
130
3514
540
095
7025
3545
1512
050
7050
3535
105
2012
045
040
2515
1525
011
550
6555
3525
5510
6030
035
2510
1520
011
045
6540
3535
5520
5030
045
3015
530
1011
045
6550
3525
55
50
015
105
55
525
1015
105
10
100
55
05
50
50
05
05
50
0
105
50
05
05
05
035
2015
1015
10
9015
9025
030
255
1015
511
045
6525
4540
50
100
015
105
010
555
1540
2020
15
355
4015
025
205
1015
015
560
9545
5555
7520
7030
040
3010
1030
011
555
6035
4040
105
100
010
55
50
525
1015
510
10
100
150
010
55
05
540
2020
515
20
4510
5010
020
155
105
512
040
8040
4040
50
50
020
155
510
535
1520
205
10
8520
8525
065
5015
2535
512
555
7050
5025
125
4010
030
045
405
2025
010
040
6040
3525
155
155
015
105
55
570
2545
2515
30
7010
6525
040
3010
1525
011
045
6540
4525
205
205
015
150
510
030
1515
515
10
250
2515
015
105
55
580
3545
3030
20
8015
6540
040
3010
1520
511
540
7530
4540
120
2512
540
050
3515
2520
511
050
6055
3520
355
4010
020
155
510
540
1525
2015
5
505
4525
030
255
1015
570
3040
2020
30
7510
7035
035
2510
1515
512
050
7040
4535
110
2012
035
060
4515
1540
512
565
6055
4525
175
3016
550
055
3520
2520
1012
560
6550
5025
6010
5025
030
255
1010
1014
560
8545
4555
100
105
010
100
55
025
1015
1010
5
205
2510
010
55
55
065
2045
2015
30
4510
5525
030
255
1020
012
560
6545
4040
505
5020
020
155
515
013
040
9030
4060
105
100
015
105
510
030
1020
1010
10
50
55
015
105
55
520
515
55
10
205
2015
015
105
010
580
2555
2020
40
3010
305
015
105
105
035
1025
510
20
55
100
010
55
05
535
1520
1510
10
7520
6525
030
2010
520
575
3540
4015
20
8515
9520
050
4010
1530
519
080
110
6065
65
105
105
05
05
05
020
515
55
10
9025
8025
040
3010
2020
095
4055
3030
35
100
155
010
55
55
070
2545
3020
20
165
4014
550
065
5015
3525
514
065
7555
5035
7010
6530
035
305
1515
511
535
8045
4525
100
105
010
55
010
055
2035
1515
25
4510
5010
035
2015
2510
070
2545
3525
10
4510
4010
025
1510
1010
595
3065
2025
50
455
4510
015
105
105
080
3545
3030
20
100
3095
300
4530
1520
205
125
5570
5040
35
7035
6020
040
3010
1520
565
2540
2520
20
5010
4025
020
1010
510
560
3030
2030
10
105
2095
300
4025
1510
255
8040
4045
2015
100
155
010
55
05
540
1525
2015
5
100
1010
05
50
50
010
55
55
0
105
3585
200
3020
1010
1010
4520
2525
155
100
2080
250
2520
510
105
6535
3030
2015
9015
8025
040
355
1520
512
550
7545
4535
9510
8035
045
3015
1525
511
550
6535
3545
155
205
025
1510
1010
525
1015
155
5
155
4013
540
055
3520
2025
1015
065
8560
4545
9520
100
200
3525
1010
205
100
3565
3045
25
3510
3510
025
1510
1015
050
1040
1510
25
120
2510
535
045
3510
2020
511
565
5065
3515
105
1510
050
035
305
1025
011
560
5560
3520
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1D
AT
AS
ET
_TIT
LE
Car
s o
r V
ans
(UV
62)
TO
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1
GE
O_H
IER
AR
CH
YN
eSS
Geo
grap
hy H
iera
rchy
HE
AD
ING
All
Hou
seho
lds
No
car
or v
an1
car
or v
an2
cars
or
vans
3 ca
rs o
r va
ns4
or m
ore
cars
or
vans
Tot
al c
ars
or v
ans
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
TC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
ST
AT
IST
ICA
L_U
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
lds
Hou
seho
lds
Veh
icle
sD
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
GB
_NA
ME
EW
_NA
ME
CT
RY
_NA
ME
Reg
ion
Co
un
tyL
AG
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
nd20
4514
2754
8838
689
3571
848
1858
192
4289
2844
5322
6076
29G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esW
ales
1209
048
3137
9755
0648
2773
7852
149
1507
613
2862
1G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
es21
6604
7558
0218
394
8636
650
9595
997
6438
2995
2923
9362
50G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
t28
1278
984
9769
1224
554
6055
8610
4120
2876
028
7499
1G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ire28
0031
5295
811
9074
8612
316
810
5066
3640
67G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ireH
alto
n47
951
1408
221
287
1042
817
2443
049
190
GO
R_N
AM
EL
A_N
AM
EM
SO
A_C
OD
EM
SO
A_N
AM
EL
SO
A_C
OD
EL
SO
A_N
AM
EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0123
67H
alto
n 00
7A71
440
625
150
43
375
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2368
Hal
ton
003A
758
307
320
114
143
605
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2369
Hal
ton
005A
600
201
288
9311
753
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0123
70H
alto
n 00
7B78
230
338
483
93
592
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2371
Hal
ton
016A
506
3424
018
933
1075
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0123
72H
alto
n 01
6B49
935
210
198
4214
788
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2373
Hal
ton
016C
538
2424
420
652
1286
3N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
74H
alto
n 00
2A60
036
252
262
3713
942
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2375
Hal
ton
002B
470
1313
226
450
1185
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
76H
alto
n 00
2C49
25
138
312
325
878
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2377
Hal
ton
004A
716
243
298
155
173
674
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2378
Hal
ton
006A
636
107
322
167
364
780
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2379
Hal
ton
006B
617
197
282
120
180
576
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2380
Hal
ton
006C
604
278
253
649
040
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
81H
alto
n 01
0A83
849
430
237
50
391
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2382
Hal
ton
010B
702
385
253
559
039
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
83H
alto
n 01
3A72
625
132
512
126
365
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
84H
alto
n 01
0C71
221
532
213
136
872
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
85H
alto
n 00
9A53
333
162
289
3514
904
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2386
Hal
ton
009B
461
510
131
141
385
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
87H
alto
n 00
9C49
534
217
209
2510
753
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2388
Hal
ton
006D
633
271
280
739
045
3N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0123
89H
alto
n 00
8A65
757
355
184
5110
922
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2390
Hal
ton
004B
652
218
309
107
153
580
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2391
Hal
ton
008B
607
195
288
102
184
562
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2392
Hal
ton
001A
498
5321
419
430
772
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0123
93H
alto
n 00
1B61
546
263
230
5917
968
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2394
Hal
ton
005B
617
203
271
113
2010
606
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2395
Hal
ton
001C
596
4826
423
042
1289
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
96H
alto
n 01
3B59
923
128
672
55
465
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2397
Hal
ton
013C
616
330
215
6110
036
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0123
98H
alto
n 01
1A49
114
820
812
312
049
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
99H
alto
n 01
3D63
724
030
581
83
503
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2400
Hal
ton
011B
498
113
259
102
240
535
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2401
Hal
ton
008C
766
8935
324
867
910
86N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
02H
alto
n 01
1C60
823
428
175
153
488
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2403
Hal
ton
013E
617
252
296
627
044
1N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
04H
alto
n 01
1D58
711
830
613
818
766
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
05H
alto
n 01
1E77
716
740
716
928
686
2N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
06H
alto
n 01
5A60
517
028
511
428
862
9N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
07H
alto
n 01
5B66
630
128
664
123
462
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2408
Hal
ton
013F
701
264
351
7211
354
3N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
09H
alto
n 01
5C57
621
325
787
163
491
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2410
Hal
ton
003B
504
3123
819
536
475
2N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0124
11H
alto
n 00
1D60
213
130
413
727
367
1N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
12H
alto
n 00
3C60
923
130
364
110
464
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2413
Hal
ton
003D
645
274
282
767
647
9N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
14H
alto
n 00
3E49
377
247
142
243
615
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2415
Hal
ton
016D
525
4324
617
544
1780
5N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
16H
alto
n 01
2A60
615
726
614
327
1368
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
17H
alto
n 01
2B50
613
126
792
133
502
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2418
Hal
ton
016E
629
7431
019
239
1487
1N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
19H
alto
n 00
4C49
120
921
956
70
352
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2420
Hal
ton
004D
732
374
289
5514
044
1N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0124
21H
alto
n 00
2D53
032
212
240
3511
844
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2422
Hal
ton
004E
638
293
285
516
341
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0124
23H
alto
n 00
2E63
291
328
189
240
778
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2424
Hal
ton
007C
609
319
222
644
036
2N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0124
25H
alto
n 00
5C65
226
128
988
113
510
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2426
Hal
ton
005D
545
119
238
148
3010
667
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2427
Hal
ton
005E
618
163
278
149
244
664
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2428
Hal
ton
012C
714
235
318
134
243
670
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2429
Hal
ton
012D
611
191
307
997
756
6N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
30H
alto
n 01
2E63
829
826
764
54
426
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2431
Hal
ton
012F
744
238
376
108
157
677
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2432
Hal
ton
014A
651
152
342
134
203
682
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2433
Hal
ton
014B
661
232
325
8516
355
5N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0124
34H
alto
n 00
9D58
441
253
251
309
881
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2435
Hal
ton
009E
608
1317
934
455
1711
06N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
36H
alto
n 01
4C48
520
022
851
60
348
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2437
Hal
ton
015D
532
202
248
736
342
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
38H
alto
n 01
4D50
422
022
845
83
354
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2439
Hal
ton
015E
625
254
270
8117
349
5N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
40H
alto
n 01
4E51
737
252
184
368
763
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2441
Hal
ton
007D
906
431
371
947
359
2N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0124
42H
alto
n 00
6E58
823
526
573
96
465
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2443
Hal
ton
008D
472
8321
214
725
560
1N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0124
44H
alto
n 01
0D40
820
316
436
50
251
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2445
Hal
ton
010E
506
240
224
384
031
2
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1D
AT
AS
ET
_TIT
LE
Eco
no
mic
Act
ivity
(UV
28)
TO
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1
GE
O_H
IER
AR
CH
YN
eSS
Geo
grap
hy H
iera
rchy
HE
AD
ING
All
Peo
ple
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
eE
cono
mic
ally
act
ive:
E
mpl
oyee
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e:
Em
ploy
ee: P
art-
time
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e:
Em
ploy
ee: F
ull-t
ime
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e:
Sel
f-em
ploy
ed w
ith
empl
oyee
s
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e:
Sel
f-em
ploy
ed w
ith
empl
oyee
s: P
art-
time
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e: S
elf-
empl
oyed
with
em
ploy
ees:
Ful
l-tim
e
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e: S
elf-
empl
oyed
with
out
empl
oyee
s
Eco
nom
ical
ly
activ
e: S
elf-
empl
oyed
w
ithou
t em
ploy
ees:
Par
t-tim
e
Eco
nom
ical
ly
activ
e: S
elf-
empl
oyed
w
ithou
t em
ploy
ees:
Ful
l-tim
e
Eco
nom
ical
ly
activ
e:
Une
mpl
oyed
Eco
nom
ical
ly
activ
e: F
ull-t
ime
Stu
dent
sE
cono
mic
ally
in
activ
eE
cono
mic
ally
in
activ
e: R
etire
dE
cono
mic
ally
in
activ
e: S
tude
nt
Eco
nom
ical
ly
inac
tive:
Loo
king
af
ter
hom
e /
fam
ily
Eco
nom
ical
ly
inac
tive:
P
erm
anen
tly s
ick
/ dis
able
d
Eco
nom
ical
ly
inac
tive:
O
ther
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
TC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
ST
AT
IST
ICA
L_U
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
GB
_NA
ME
EW
_NA
ME
CT
RY
_NA
ME
Reg
ion
Co
un
tyL
AD
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
3553
2091
2375
6707
1869
5282
4196
041
1449
9241
1049
823
1515
7589
8248
1905
165
5424
5813
6270
711
8885
591
7582
1177
5384
4811
595
1660
564
2316
229
1884
901
1102
095
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Wal
es20
7534
712
6549
798
5748
2347
9075
0958
6219
281
9553
997
9731
024
635
7267
572
488
4775
980
9850
3073
5510
6220
1326
2719
1342
7230
6G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
es37
6074
3825
0222
0419
6810
3044
3083
115
2501
9911
1201
515
9770
9522
4520
0247
556
7093
1435
382
1261
343
9653
4112
5852
3451
1895
017
6678
424
4885
620
7624
311
7440
1G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
t48
3966
930
9318
624
5071
057
4505
1876
205
1341
6518
941
1152
2420
9682
5652
415
3158
1755
4912
3080
1746
483
6910
7222
3770
2960
6537
4928
1606
48G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ire48
9125
3320
3026
5046
6123
120
3815
1694
725
7014
377
2556
180
9017
471
1235
712
119
1570
9575
063
1733
729
292
2416
511
238
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
Nor
th W
est
Che
shire
Hal
ton
8564
554
521
4490
710
617
3429
015
2119
513
2624
3360
218
3138
8017
8031
124
1100
831
7458
9283
5526
95G
OR
_NA
ME
LA
_NA
ME
MS
OA
_CO
DE
MS
OA
_NA
ME
LS
OA
_CO
DE
LS
OA
_NA
ME
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2367
Hal
ton
007A
1014
536
420
120
300
150
1520
416
6318
478
151
3891
139
59N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0123
68H
alto
n 00
3A11
7673
159
216
642
620
317
4711
3649
2344
518
349
6111
834
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2369
Hal
ton
005A
1074
645
524
143
381
140
1432
1022
5223
429
176
3975
111
28N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0123
70H
alto
n 00
7B12
3982
068
216
751
519
019
396
3354
2641
914
739
7511
444
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2371
Hal
ton
016A
1034
805
701
126
575
50
543
637
2531
229
8744
4742
9N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0123
72H
alto
n 01
6B10
0573
362
413
748
725
322
369
2719
2927
211
741
3656
22N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0123
73H
alto
n 01
6C11
6383
471
812
659
216
016
377
3024
3932
915
837
4670
18N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
74H
alto
n 00
2A11
7388
173
316
157
247
542
4311
3220
3829
214
049
4441
18N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
75H
alto
n 00
2B10
2378
664
614
650
059
554
328
2424
2523
710
448
4328
14N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
76H
alto
n 00
2C10
2590
077
812
365
553
1043
325
2713
2412
544
2325
2112
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2377
Hal
ton
004A
1334
831
664
198
466
203
1734
430
7637
503
155
4789
159
53N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
78H
alto
n 00
6A12
6082
468
019
948
135
530
3412
2236
3943
622
840
5099
19N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
79H
alto
n 00
6B11
3171
660
417
343
123
1013
276
2130
3241
515
440
6011
744
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2380
Hal
ton
006C
1033
555
448
139
309
60
620
812
6714
478
165
4583
124
61N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
81H
alto
n 01
0A12
3065
245
710
035
711
011
195
1414
223
578
9746
108
261
66N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
82H
alto
n 01
0B11
0258
045
791
366
123
97
34
959
522
118
4111
919
153
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2383
Hal
ton
013A
1277
794
645
134
511
200
2039
1326
7218
483
160
3874
168
43N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
84H
alto
n 01
0C12
2974
560
814
046
827
522
326
2653
2548
419
744
7013
142
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2385
Hal
ton
009A
1003
779
638
104
534
427
3566
1947
249
224
9122
5237
22N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
86H
alto
n 00
9B10
0086
477
512
764
820
020
285
2316
2513
626
3147
2012
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2387
Hal
ton
009C
880
592
492
9939
323
023
4112
2920
1628
817
531
3338
11N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
88H
alto
n 00
6D11
1064
053
615
638
013
310
277
2048
1647
016
535
9412
848
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2389
Hal
ton
008A
1346
826
709
191
518
264
2234
925
2037
520
297
4754
9230
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2390
Hal
ton
004B
1137
620
496
144
352
213
1836
1620
5017
517
243
3267
145
30N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0123
91H
alto
n 00
8B10
4867
054
614
739
924
420
264
2255
1937
814
531
6310
732
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2392
Hal
ton
001A
989
741
632
142
490
305
2528
622
1932
248
111
2938
5119
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2393
Hal
ton
001B
1147
723
560
118
442
525
4767
2740
2123
424
238
4053
7320
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2394
Hal
ton
005B
1034
635
507
148
359
234
1939
1029
5115
399
161
5058
9436
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2395
Hal
ton
001C
1169
784
637
156
481
387
3148
1533
2734
385
225
2648
6917
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2396
Hal
ton
013B
1100
578
430
102
328
70
721
318
101
1952
215
938
108
153
64N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
97H
alto
n 01
3C97
648
138
596
289
123
916
412
5612
495
150
4211
213
160
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2398
Hal
ton
011A
829
502
421
8633
513
49
246
1828
1632
714
337
5374
20N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
99H
alto
n 01
3D10
5959
950
712
638
111
38
163
1355
1046
016
347
9710
350
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2400
Hal
ton
011B
892
569
481
8040
121
318
264
2229
1232
314
929
4780
18N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0124
01H
alto
n 00
8C14
9496
475
216
658
660
951
8230
5231
3953
027
961
7191
28N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
02H
alto
n 01
1C10
3658
448
810
338
58
35
195
1451
1845
213
843
9413
245
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2403
Hal
ton
013E
1079
587
476
128
348
50
518
315
7711
492
111
3811
718
739
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2404
Hal
ton
011D
1146
733
622
120
502
163
1342
735
3518
413
175
4160
108
29N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
05H
alto
n 01
1E14
3794
681
518
762
812
012
419
3240
3849
119
758
8611
634
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2406
Hal
ton
015A
1092
690
578
139
439
153
1224
420
5617
402
130
3879
121
34N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
07H
alto
n 01
5B10
9862
849
714
035
70
00
184
1499
1447
095
4011
418
338
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2408
Hal
ton
013F
1243
639
501
122
379
33
021
516
9618
604
104
6717
219
764
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2409
Hal
ton
015C
1009
628
530
129
401
40
422
418
5418
381
9729
6115
737
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2410
Hal
ton
003B
1053
788
685
144
541
213
1835
728
2027
265
8549
5656
19N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0124
11H
alto
n 00
1D10
4267
056
816
440
417
314
347
2728
2337
218
922
5587
19N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
12H
alto
n 00
3C95
355
044
813
031
814
014
170
1753
1840
314
725
6013
932
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2413
Hal
ton
003D
944
566
448
117
331
140
1421
417
5825
378
126
2875
109
40N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
14H
alto
n 00
3E10
2272
162
316
246
113
013
236
1727
3530
110
835
5384
21N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0124
15H
alto
n 01
6D11
2179
867
315
252
113
013
458
3733
3432
314
744
4757
28N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
16H
alto
n 01
2A98
457
345
196
355
364
3237
928
3514
411
216
2964
7626
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2417
Hal
ton
012B
822
528
440
9434
615
411
3110
2131
1129
411
921
6169
24N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0124
18H
alto
n 01
6E11
6865
754
211
542
718
513
4122
1932
2451
132
039
5570
27N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
19H
alto
n 00
4C90
954
843
413
230
28
08
100
1078
1836
110
045
7111
233
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2420
Hal
ton
004D
1069
549
419
135
284
90
918
414
8320
520
174
3810
115
948
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2421
Hal
ton
002D
1082
819
685
146
539
406
3440
634
2034
263
114
4342
4321
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2422
Hal
ton
004E
966
534
437
152
285
105
520
515
5215
432
149
4898
101
36N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0124
23H
alto
n 00
2E10
8881
168
413
155
320
317
4612
3436
2527
711
830
4364
22N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0124
24H
alto
n 00
7C10
1751
839
812
627
27
07
233
2069
2149
911
060
122
160
47N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0124
25H
alto
n 00
5C11
1163
852
215
536
715
015
338
2548
2047
317
946
8212
145
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2426
Hal
ton
005D
996
657
533
141
392
416
3543
637
1822
339
176
3941
5627
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2427
Hal
ton
005E
1180
809
704
169
535
183
1531
922
3818
371
9862
8589
37N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
28H
alto
n 01
2C11
0474
563
614
249
414
014
297
2230
3635
914
240
6577
35N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
29H
alto
n 01
2D99
359
449
212
037
215
015
299
2041
1739
918
524
8282
26N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
30H
alto
n 01
2E10
1956
142
812
030
811
38
203
1791
1145
812
042
103
142
51N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
31H
alto
n 01
2F12
1082
369
713
955
830
327
294
2551
1638
713
128
7711
338
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2432
Hal
ton
014A
1180
810
686
124
562
103
729
524
6520
370
102
4280
115
31N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
33H
alto
n 01
4B11
4372
058
914
844
115
312
308
2266
2042
382
4811
213
447
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2434
Hal
ton
009D
1183
912
810
144
666
230
2335
1124
3113
271
103
4349
6610
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2435
Hal
ton
009E
1333
1076
902
170
732
373
3476
1561
2140
257
7543
6360
16N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
36H
alto
n 01
4C89
855
145
511
933
64
04
143
1164
1434
760
5011
084
43N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
37H
alto
n 01
5D10
4165
052
714
837
95
05
198
1176
2339
174
4213
110
737
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2438
Hal
ton
014D
841
479
376
8329
36
06
164
1267
1436
296
4179
102
44N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
39H
alto
n 01
5E11
5572
058
914
844
111
011
225
1770
2843
585
5711
713
442
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2440
Hal
ton
014E
1173
939
820
127
693
133
1026
917
4238
234
5341
5165
24N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0124
41H
alto
n 00
7D13
1574
357
313
743
627
324
358
2793
1557
214
841
118
197
68N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0124
42H
alto
n 00
6E10
0156
644
113
330
819
316
209
1158
2843
513
138
105
124
37N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0124
43H
alto
n 00
8D97
971
059
014
144
918
315
318
2339
3226
966
3554
8727
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2444
Hal
ton
010D
775
392
286
8220
43
03
93
676
1838
354
4210
114
640
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2445
Hal
ton
010E
899
425
324
8623
83
03
143
1167
1747
478
4411
019
151
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
DA
TA
SE
T_T
ITL
EG
ener
al H
ealt
h (
UV
20)
TO
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
GE
O_H
IER
AR
CH
YN
eSS
Geo
grap
hy H
iera
rchy
HE
AD
ING
All
Peo
ple
Goo
d H
ealth
Fai
rly
Goo
d H
ealth
Not
Goo
d H
ealth
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T_ U
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
ST
AT
IST
ICA
L_U
NIP
erso
nsP
erso
nsP
erso
nsP
erso
nsG
B_N
AM
EE
W_N
AM
EC
TR
Y_N
AM
ER
egio
nC
ou
nty
LA
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd
Wal
esE
ngla
nd49
1388
3133
7873
6110
9155
9444
3587
6
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd
Wal
esW
ales
2903
085
1888
849
6527
6936
1467
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd
Wal
es52
0419
1635
6762
1011
5683
6347
9734
3
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
t67
2976
445
0118
314
9146
773
7114
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ire67
3788
4754
3114
0904
5745
3
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ireH
alto
n11
8208
7863
125
807
1377
0G
OR
_NA
ME
LA
_NA
ME
MS
OA
_CO
DE
MS
OA
_NA
ME
LS
OA
_CO
DE
LS
OA
_NA
ME
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2367
Hal
ton
007A
1484
887
359
238
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2368
Hal
ton
003A
1693
1022
437
234
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2369
Hal
ton
005A
1493
940
342
211
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2370
Hal
ton
007B
1720
1143
394
183
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2371
Hal
ton
016A
1347
1018
231
98N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0123
72H
alto
n 01
6B12
5191
923
399
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2373
Hal
ton
016C
1386
998
260
128
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2374
Hal
ton
002A
1580
1218
273
89N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
75H
alto
n 00
2B13
9611
1222
163
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2376
Hal
ton
002C
1473
1266
166
41N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0123
77H
alto
n 00
4A18
0311
8840
620
9N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
78H
alto
n 00
6A16
0011
1231
916
9N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
79H
alto
n 00
6B15
4210
1035
817
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
80H
alto
n 00
6C15
0390
439
020
9N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
81H
alto
n 01
0A16
4493
742
128
6N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
82H
alto
n 01
0B15
0887
736
726
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
83H
alto
n 01
3A16
9010
4837
826
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
84H
alto
n 01
0C15
8799
238
820
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
85H
alto
n 00
9A13
3810
2922
287
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2386
Hal
ton
009B
1431
1211
180
40N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
87H
alto
n 00
9C11
3781
022
998
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2388
Hal
ton
006D
1617
1046
352
219
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2389
Hal
ton
008A
1689
1174
360
155
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2390
Hal
ton
004B
1534
919
382
233
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2391
Hal
ton
008B
1409
872
355
182
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2392
Hal
ton
001A
1349
1028
220
101
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2393
Hal
ton
001B
1540
1057
339
144
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2394
Hal
ton
005B
1501
992
339
170
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2395
Hal
ton
001C
1518
1098
316
104
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2396
Hal
ton
013B
1540
914
381
245
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2397
Hal
ton
013C
1434
876
361
197
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2398
Hal
ton
011A
1178
758
279
141
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2399
Hal
ton
013D
1477
941
335
201
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2400
Hal
ton
011B
1236
822
295
119
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2401
Hal
ton
008C
1898
1282
425
191
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2402
Hal
ton
011C
1527
934
390
203
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2403
Hal
ton
013E
1574
928
382
264
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2404
Hal
ton
011D
1485
1026
306
153
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2405
Hal
ton
011E
2011
1370
429
212
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2406
Hal
ton
015A
1477
937
351
189
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2407
Hal
ton
015B
1523
918
355
250
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2408
Hal
ton
013F
1934
1202
431
301
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2409
Hal
ton
015C
1479
916
362
201
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2410
Hal
ton
003B
1354
1012
247
95N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0124
11H
alto
n 00
1D14
3095
232
215
6N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
12H
alto
n 00
3C13
1679
132
120
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
13H
alto
n 00
3D14
5086
435
822
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
14H
alto
n 00
3E13
3694
626
112
9N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0124
15H
alto
n 01
6D14
3010
6825
510
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
16H
alto
n 01
2A14
2787
534
021
2N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
17H
alto
n 01
2B11
5972
129
014
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0124
18H
alto
n 01
6E14
9196
337
315
5N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
19H
alto
n 00
4C12
4181
328
014
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
20H
alto
n 00
4D15
3490
437
625
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0124
21H
alto
n 00
2D13
9410
5024
995
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2422
Hal
ton
004E
1452
936
338
178
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2423
Hal
ton
002E
1446
1035
272
139
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2424
Hal
ton
007C
1511
881
371
259
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2425
Hal
ton
005C
1588
1042
329
217
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2426
Hal
ton
005D
1330
897
293
140
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2427
Hal
ton
005E
1667
1171
321
175
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2428
Hal
ton
012C
1620
1048
402
170
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2429
Hal
ton
012D
1433
891
352
190
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2430
Hal
ton
012E
1486
946
331
209
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2431
Hal
ton
012F
1607
1065
386
156
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2432
Hal
ton
014A
1521
1010
341
170
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2433
Hal
ton
014B
1622
1075
346
201
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2434
Hal
ton
009D
1571
1182
285
104
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2435
Hal
ton
009E
1780
1412
270
98N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
36H
alto
n 01
4C13
4889
031
214
6N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
37H
alto
n 01
5D14
9410
1633
214
6N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
38H
alto
n 01
4D12
4379
227
417
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
39H
alto
n 01
5E16
3010
6235
021
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
40H
alto
n 01
4E15
1211
2327
911
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0124
41H
alto
n 00
7D18
9111
3346
529
3N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0124
42H
alto
n 00
6E15
6098
736
820
5N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0124
43H
alto
n 00
8D13
6394
827
014
5N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0124
44H
alto
n 01
0D11
4270
824
319
1N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0124
45H
alto
n 01
0E12
9377
128
623
6
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
Jan-
2007
DA
TA
SE
T_T
ITL
EIn
dic
es o
f D
epri
vati
on
200
7 fo
r S
up
er O
utp
ut
Are
asT
OJa
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07Ja
n-20
07
AR
EA
_TY
PE
Sup
er O
utpu
t Are
a Lo
wer
Lay
erH
EA
DIN
G
Inde
x of
Mul
tiple
D
epriv
atio
n S
core
Ran
k of
Inde
x of
M
ultip
le
Dep
rivat
ion
Sco
reIn
com
e S
core
Ran
k of
Inco
me
Sco
reE
mpl
oym
ent
Sco
re
Ran
k of
E
mpl
oym
ent
Sco
re
Hea
lth
Dep
rivat
ion
and
Dis
abili
ty S
core
Ran
k of
Hea
lth
Dep
rivat
ion
and
Dis
abili
ty S
core
Edu
catio
n S
kills
an
d T
rain
ing
Sco
re
Ran
k of
E
duca
tion
Ski
lls
and
Tra
inin
g S
core
Bar
riers
to
Hou
sing
and
S
ervi
ces
Sco
re
Ran
k of
Bar
riers
to
Hou
sing
and
S
ervi
ces
Sco
reC
rime
Sco
reR
ank
of C
rime
Sco
re
Livi
ng
Env
ironm
ent
Sco
re
Ran
k of
Liv
ing
Env
ironm
ent
Sco
re
Inde
x of
Mul
tiple
D
epriv
atio
n; S
OA
P
opul
atio
n
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T_U
NIT
Sco
reR
ank
Sco
reR
ank
Sco
reR
ank
Sco
reR
ank
Sco
reR
ank
Sco
reR
ank
Sco
reR
ank
Sco
reR
ank
Cou
ntS
TA
TIS
TIC
AL
_UN
ITA
reas
Are
asA
reas
Are
asA
reas
Are
asA
reas
Are
asA
reas
Are
asA
reas
Are
asA
reas
Are
asA
reas
Are
asP
erso
nsD
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
LS
OA
_CO
DE
LS
OA
_NA
ME
E01
0123
67H
alto
n 00
7A59
.02
1001
0.39
2124
0.25
1138
1.87
665
58.7
719
519.
728
142
1.54
987
43.3
541
1913
95E
0101
2368
Hal
ton
003A
30.7
278
970.
1993
280.
1566
301.
1831
3024
.57
1075
97.
1930
218
0.4
1050
538
.84
5449
1767
E01
0123
69H
alto
n 00
5A31
.47
7593
0.18
1059
40.
1935
221.
1831
4723
.21
1148
26.
6530
588
0.44
9896
23.9
511
498
1428
E01
0123
70H
alto
n 00
7B34
.45
6484
0.2
9164
0.13
8745
1.06
3949
36.4
961
956.
6930
556
0.38
1079
469
.34
443
1659
E01
0123
71H
alto
n 01
6A13
.78
1944
70.
0625
896
0.08
1678
50.
4798
1516
.32
1599
323
.66
1247
1-0
.73
2614
012
.45
1996
713
59E
0101
2372
Hal
ton
016B
13.6
1962
30.
0330
426
0.09
1508
60.
2912
028
10.5
920
998
28.5
881
760.
2113
140
4.97
2873
211
85E
0101
2373
Hal
ton
016C
14.1
719
043
0.03
3082
80.
0817
428
0.22
1298
712
.45
1925
633
.32
5025
0.23
1290
18.
2124
743
1380
E01
0123
74H
alto
n 00
2A6.
9527
699
0.04
3022
60.
0525
080
-0.0
917
277
4.8
2728
119
.22
1736
8-0
.07
1725
53.
7330
181
2262
E01
0123
75H
alto
n 00
2B6.
5428
203
0.02
3211
70.
0524
061
-0.0
116
227
3.17
2924
019
.16
1744
5-0
.22
1935
53.
2430
698
1554
E01
0123
76H
alto
n 00
2C6.
5228
232
0.03
3093
80.
0330
481
0.08
1493
95.
7426
141
24.9
211
280
-0.5
724
129
2.6
3130
218
33E
0101
2377
Hal
ton
004A
35.6
560
480.
288
700.
1933
371.
324
9542
.74
4642
14.6
622
763
0.56
8409
12.1
220
292
1761
E01
0123
78H
alto
n 00
6A16
.25
1703
60.
0624
374
0.11
1048
60.
4510
096
19.9
513
430
8.15
2950
5-0
.06
1716
915
.12
1743
915
45E
0101
2379
Hal
ton
006B
32.4
271
990.
1710
880
0.15
6016
1.09
3723
32.7
673
316.
7230
535
0.53
8771
47.0
532
7114
52E
0101
2380
Hal
ton
006C
45.2
932
620.
3237
330.
2318
291.
6112
2350
.75
3087
14.2
623
239
0.23
1288
720
.34
1359
914
52E
0101
2381
Hal
ton
010A
67.5
534
40.
5149
40.
3887
2.75
3258
.35
2013
12.5
825
172
1.08
3225
11.0
721
413
1416
E01
0123
82H
alto
n 01
0B60
.52
866
0.44
1224
0.36
125
2.51
9555
.25
2423
20.8
815
463
0.01
1616
85.
8927
575
1344
E01
0123
83H
alto
n 01
3A39
.09
4923
0.2
9120
0.21
2574
1.64
1159
27.2
894
7711
.87
2595
40.
9146
6129
.11
8999
1626
E01
0123
84H
alto
n 01
0C37
.554
030.
2280
300.
2318
001.
3323
4023
.12
1153
021
.35
1493
10.
7659
968.
124
870
1611
E01
0123
85H
alto
n 00
9A9.
3724
675
0.04
3027
60.
0526
516
0.19
1340
95.
1226
877
32.3
555
96-0
.62
2482
77.
5825
520
1524
E01
0123
86H
alto
n 00
9B7.
2227
371
0.02
3213
10.
0427
453
0.21
1305
76.
2825
533
27.6
489
44-1
.44
3121
41.
5232
101
1728
E01
0123
87H
alto
n 00
9C10
.63
2301
30.
0528
147
0.07
2078
00.
2512
663
6.25
2558
028
.25
8440
-0.7
626
449
10.2
222
323
1146
E01
0123
88H
alto
n 00
6D41
.65
4234
0.29
4740
0.18
3941
1.48
1689
43.2
845
1712
.24
2555
31.
1428
5419
.73
1401
816
68E
0101
2389
Hal
ton
008A
11.8
821
512
0.06
2561
50.
0914
484
0.3
1190
712
.46
1924
09.
0228
777
-0.1
217
919
6.7
2657
217
91E
0101
2390
Hal
ton
004B
35.5
760
850.
2566
890.
1937
461.
2726
2431
.89
7647
8.23
2943
00.
7560
7817
.34
1571
115
21E
0101
2391
Hal
ton
008B
49.3
424
360.
2949
670.
2413
412.
0140
536
.03
6328
24.3
511
774
0.78
5788
30.4
184
2013
77E
0101
2392
Hal
ton
001A
10.2
2356
40.
0429
778
0.06
2097
40.
3511
287
10.5
821
006
16.7
2033
1-0
.05
1703
38.
8423
935
1767
E01
0123
93H
alto
n 00
1B9.
4524
550
0.04
3034
60.
0718
208
0.14
1412
34.
9627
106
6.73
3052
10.
591
755.
4928
097
1623
E01
0123
94H
alto
n 00
5B31
.775
130.
290
880.
1657
901.
1831
5624
.62
1072
78.
2729
393
0.2
1327
644
.06
3953
1491
E01
0123
95H
alto
n 00
1C10
.91
2265
70.
0527
417
0.09
1400
00.
1613
756
8.92
2263
711
.65
2619
9-0
.07
1733
25.
328
326
1449
E01
0123
96H
alto
n 01
3B50
.09
2285
0.36
2784
0.25
1145
1.67
1079
52.0
128
6913
.524
106
0.74
6263
17.4
415
636
1536
E01
0123
97H
alto
n 01
3C55
.66
1392
0.39
1955
0.25
1279
1.91
574
59.3
818
849.
9127
937
1.2
2465
23.3
911
792
1443
E01
0123
98H
alto
n 01
1A20
.513
507
0.13
1432
90.
1110
567
0.76
6657
24.3
510
860
7.08
3030
1-0
.16
1847
814
.49
1797
412
39E
0101
2399
Hal
ton
013D
43.5
936
930.
2756
380.
1934
251.
6311
7359
.28
1890
13.5
524
040
0.91
4577
16.4
116
396
1446
E01
0124
00H
alto
n 01
1B19
.95
1394
40.
1116
978
0.12
9324
0.77
6538
20.5
313
022
5.46
3130
5-0
.53
2367
022
.22
1242
712
27E
0101
2401
Hal
ton
008C
20.3
613
635
0.09
1983
80.
1294
500.
3611
136
9.89
2165
113
.424
225
1.19
2528
15.6
117
033
1866
E01
0124
02H
alto
n 01
1C46
.928
960.
2946
270.
2414
811.
7686
742
.32
4732
15.2
322
079
0.98
4086
17.9
515
237
1497
E01
0124
03H
alto
n 01
3E59
.44
964
0.44
1174
0.27
763
2.19
249
56.2
2271
13.1
124
557
1.16
2688
13.3
319
070
1491
E01
0124
04H
alto
n 01
1D24
.44
1093
80.
1512
319
0.14
7591
0.9
5248
24.4
110
836
16.7
420
280
-0.0
216
576
12.5
319
879
1461
E01
0124
05H
alto
n 01
1E24
.42
1095
40.
1512
939
0.14
7784
0.79
6304
24.8
910
585
7.79
2977
30.
3411
360
20.6
813
386
1989
E01
0124
06H
alto
n 01
5A39
.45
4820
0.28
5309
0.19
3690
1.44
1816
30.7
880
4133
.07
5177
0.61
7768
5.72
2778
714
91E
0101
2407
Hal
ton
015B
59.4
696
30.
419
090.
3139
42.
2321
950
.57
3119
34.0
546
380.
5486
259.
8222
760
1461
E01
0124
08H
alto
n 01
3F60
.73
845
0.51
463
0.27
773
2.08
339
55.3
624
1123
.51
1261
00.
7363
704.
7329
044
1890
E01
0124
09H
alto
n 01
5C45
.33
3247
0.27
5386
0.21
2312
1.88
640
44.0
343
2728
.99
7869
0.7
6753
8.66
2417
214
28E
0101
2410
Hal
ton
003B
13.6
719
554
0.04
2899
90.
0815
849
0.57
8673
14.9
1711
626
.43
9968
-0.7
426
167
8.27
2467
913
11E
0101
2411
Hal
ton
001D
21.7
212
651
0.11
1684
70.
1292
510.
862
3622
.68
1176
216
.55
2051
3-0
.117
649
19.6
814
056
1368
E01
0124
12H
alto
n 00
3C42
.49
4004
0.26
5951
0.21
2345
1.72
928
41.7
648
6112
.83
2489
30.
0415
646
37.3
5965
1359
E01
0124
13H
alto
n 00
3D38
.58
5097
0.25
6445
0.19
3486
1.71
958
38.6
756
067.
829
760
-0.0
216
503
29.7
387
2614
19E
0101
2414
Hal
ton
003E
17.3
1606
30.
0625
278
0.12
1032
80.
5489
7717
.02
1547
113
.28
2436
6-0
.16
1851
225
.18
1084
312
57E
0101
2415
Hal
ton
016D
14.0
919
132
0.04
2977
60.
0720
028
0.12
1434
616
.28
1603
134
.33
4498
-0.2
619
988
16.7
1618
514
01E
0101
2416
Hal
ton
012A
18.7
414
913
0.11
1739
50.
1111
613
0.62
8121
11.7
619
864
29.8
672
76-0
.826
835
13.7
1869
616
02E
0101
2417
Hal
ton
012B
33.9
366
530.
1413
670
0.12
9287
1.06
3956
38.8
655
5734
.16
4589
-0.0
216
565
57.9
1359
1212
E01
0124
18H
alto
n 01
6E12
.16
2120
90.
0429
492
0.08
1634
30.
3611
216
5.85
2601
622
.18
1401
90.
0615
400
11.7
120
729
1422
E01
0124
19H
alto
n 00
4C45
.79
3152
0.31
4197
0.21
2331
1.73
924
57.8
420
8716
.121
076
0.38
1067
918
.65
1473
111
58E
0101
2420
Hal
ton
004D
50.0
222
950.
3530
240.
2511
031.
8765
642
.31
4734
11.7
126
126
1.05
3535
13.2
819
122
1542
E01
0124
21H
alto
n 00
2D10
.74
2287
60.
0428
662
0.08
1749
30.
311
961
10.2
921
281
17.9
118
885
-0.2
319
516
6.69
2658
813
98E
0101
2422
Hal
ton
004E
51.0
521
050.
3334
290.
2318
141.
6511
1546
.438
5419
.65
1686
71.
4512
8327
.16
9839
1446
E01
0124
23H
alto
n 00
2E14
.41
1877
50.
0821
420
0.09
1438
00.
5588
6212
.43
1927
114
.61
2281
3-0
.43
2227
913
.07
1933
014
34E
0101
2424
Hal
ton
007C
67.1
437
00.
4870
90.
2866
42.
1131
768
.89
1003
13.2
224
427
1.14
2859
49.5
627
2217
91E
0101
2425
Hal
ton
005C
44.3
3513
0.3
4433
0.2
2971
1.49
1643
44.1
842
909.
2428
584
0.77
5913
43.2
441
4315
69E
0101
2426
Hal
ton
005D
18.6
514
978
0.11
1687
90.
1111
641
0.67
7520
10.6
420
945
6.25
3085
50.
3710
931
22.0
812
519
1278
E01
0124
27H
alto
n 00
5E29
.15
8574
0.2
9284
0.13
8721
1.13
3467
28.3
390
119.
5128
329
0.73
6327
22.3
212
371
1698
E01
0124
28H
alto
n 01
2C22
.41
1221
50.
1314
184
0.11
1077
00.
8953
3523
.05
1156
68.
629
124
-0.0
517
014
27.1
398
5616
50E
0101
2429
Hal
ton
012D
30.1
781
190.
2280
960.
1383
801.
0739
1033
.81
6981
27.8
8806
-0.1
1775
216
.516
337
1401
E01
0124
30H
alto
n 01
2E52
.86
1803
0.37
2531
0.25
1205
1.87
663
37.6
658
679.
5128
333
1.04
3587
44.1
139
3314
58E
0101
2431
Hal
ton
012F
36.7
756
420.
289
650.
1566
351.
137
0324
.66
1070
44.
7331
643
1.51
1079
55.3
617
1917
31E
0101
2432
Hal
ton
014A
26.2
299
370.
1611
480
0.12
9920
1.03
4205
35.8
863
7022
.413
787
0.03
1584
79.
1723
560
1515
E01
0124
33H
alto
n 01
4B44
.09
3571
0.35
2833
0.21
2508
1.48
1663
55.8
923
2311
.72
2610
70.
4499
446.
4726
848
1590
E01
0124
34H
alto
n 00
9D14
.49
1868
70.
0625
864
0.1
1296
70.
6973
3715
.33
1676
817
.39
1951
6-0
.69
2560
98.
4524
439
1530
E01
0124
35H
alto
n 00
9E10
.52
2315
10.
0330
598
0.08
1801
00.
0914
775
6.62
2516
222
.29
1389
60.
2512
534
5.03
2866
720
07E
0101
2436
Hal
ton
014C
43.4
837
290.
3528
280.
1932
131.
3821
0649
.54
3307
17.6
419
225
0.85
5170
7.39
2576
113
32E
0101
2437
Hal
ton
015D
44.7
3409
0.33
3333
0.18
4394
1.53
1508
54.9
624
5437
.67
3054
0.21
1309
47.
0626
158
1422
E01
0124
38H
alto
n 01
4D48
.81
2520
0.41
1644
0.22
2003
1.8
781
43.6
444
2711
.38
2645
40.
6672
2214
.42
1803
012
03E
0101
2439
Hal
ton
015E
43.7
936
460.
2946
610.
230
451.
5912
9648
.89
3405
33.9
347
110.
2712
315
8.84
2394
015
81E
0101
2440
Hal
ton
014E
21.0
713
107
0.09
2005
50.
1111
361
0.9
5295
28.9
8779
11.2
826
572
0.46
9696
11.9
320
494
1452
E01
0124
41H
alto
n 00
7D58
.59
1052
0.39
2101
0.29
562
2.07
350
58.9
219
349.
6928
155
0.5
9187
44.7
137
9718
96E
0101
2442
Hal
ton
006E
53.3
217
300.
4313
610.
2222
251.
7588
954
.79
2476
17.5
119
367
0.94
4381
26.8
210
016
1488
E01
0124
43H
alto
n 00
8D27
.07
9531
0.14
1393
10.
1382
861.
0838
5426
.73
9728
17.3
819
544
0.62
7695
20.6
613
399
1293
E01
0124
44H
alto
n 01
0D68
.46
306
0.56
232
0.33
226
2.3
175
57.2
821
4925
.54
1072
10.
9741
2112
.21
2019
911
25E
0101
2445
Hal
ton
010E
63.8
568
0.5
567
0.31
356
2.3
173
57.5
2121
17.5
119
368
0.98
4101
8.42
2448
012
57
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1D
AT
AS
ET
_TIT
LE
Lim
itin
g L
on
g-t
erm
Illn
ess
(UV
22)
TO
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1
GE
O_H
IER
AR
CH
YN
eSS
Geo
grap
hy H
iera
rchy
HE
AD
ING
All
Peo
ple
With
a L
imiti
ng
Long
-Ter
m
Illne
ss
With
out a
Li
miti
ng L
ong-
Ter
m Il
lnes
s
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T_U
NIT
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntS
TA
TIS
TIC
AL
_UN
ITP
erso
nsP
erso
nsP
erso
nsG
B_N
AM
EE
W_N
AM
EC
TR
Y_N
AM
ER
egio
nC
ou
nty
LA
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
EG
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
nd49
1388
3188
0919
440
3296
37G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esW
ales
2903
085
6756
6222
2742
3G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
es52
0419
1694
8485
642
5570
60G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
t67
2976
413
9460
953
3515
5G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ire67
3788
1172
5155
6537
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
Nor
th W
est
Che
shire
Hal
ton
1182
0825
440
9276
8G
OR
_NA
ME
LA
_NA
ME
MS
OA
_CO
DE
MS
OA
_NA
ME
LS
OA
_CO
DE
LS
OA
_NA
ME
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2367
Hal
ton
007A
1484
415
1069
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2368
Hal
ton
003A
1693
441
1252
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2369
Hal
ton
005A
1493
362
1131
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2370
Hal
ton
007B
1720
363
1357
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2371
Hal
ton
016A
1347
182
1165
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2372
Hal
ton
016B
1251
199
1052
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2373
Hal
ton
016C
1386
218
1168
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2374
Hal
ton
002A
1580
198
1382
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2375
Hal
ton
002B
1396
128
1268
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2376
Hal
ton
002C
1473
8613
87N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0123
77H
alto
n 00
4A18
0339
014
13N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
78H
alto
n 00
6A16
0031
312
87N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
79H
alto
n 00
6B15
4234
711
95N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
80H
alto
n 00
6C15
0339
311
10N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
81H
alto
n 01
0A16
4452
211
22N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
82H
alto
n 01
0B15
0844
610
62N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
83H
alto
n 01
3A16
9046
212
28N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
84H
alto
n 01
0C15
8740
511
82N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
85H
alto
n 00
9A13
3815
511
83N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
86H
alto
n 00
9B14
3197
1334
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2387
Hal
ton
009C
1137
199
938
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2388
Hal
ton
006D
1617
399
1218
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2389
Hal
ton
008A
1689
371
1318
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2390
Hal
ton
004B
1534
424
1110
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2391
Hal
ton
008B
1409
342
1067
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2392
Hal
ton
001A
1349
199
1150
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2393
Hal
ton
001B
1540
340
1200
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2394
Hal
ton
005B
1501
320
1181
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2395
Hal
ton
001C
1518
250
1268
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2396
Hal
ton
013B
1540
415
1125
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2397
Hal
ton
013C
1434
355
1079
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2398
Hal
ton
011A
1178
272
906
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2399
Hal
ton
013D
1477
352
1125
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2400
Hal
ton
011B
1236
236
1000
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2401
Hal
ton
008C
1898
370
1528
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2402
Hal
ton
011C
1527
393
1134
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2403
Hal
ton
013E
1574
429
1145
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2404
Hal
ton
011D
1485
275
1210
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2405
Hal
ton
011E
2011
405
1606
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2406
Hal
ton
015A
1477
336
1141
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2407
Hal
ton
015B
1523
426
1097
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2408
Hal
ton
013F
1934
491
1443
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2409
Hal
ton
015C
1479
447
1032
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2410
Hal
ton
003B
1354
192
1162
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2411
Hal
ton
001D
1430
327
1103
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2412
Hal
ton
003C
1316
390
926
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2413
Hal
ton
003D
1450
444
1006
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2414
Hal
ton
003E
1336
230
1106
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2415
Hal
ton
016D
1430
206
1224
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2416
Hal
ton
012A
1427
383
1044
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2417
Hal
ton
012B
1159
259
900
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2418
Hal
ton
016E
1491
336
1155
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2419
Hal
ton
004C
1241
284
957
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2420
Hal
ton
004D
1534
467
1067
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2421
Hal
ton
002D
1394
192
1202
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2422
Hal
ton
004E
1452
331
1121
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2423
Hal
ton
002E
1446
256
1190
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2424
Hal
ton
007C
1511
408
1103
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2425
Hal
ton
005C
1588
368
1220
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2426
Hal
ton
005D
1330
274
1056
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2427
Hal
ton
005E
1667
299
1368
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2428
Hal
ton
012C
1620
353
1267
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2429
Hal
ton
012D
1433
328
1105
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2430
Hal
ton
012E
1486
356
1130
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2431
Hal
ton
012F
1607
309
1298
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2432
Hal
ton
014A
1521
290
1231
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2433
Hal
ton
014B
1622
357
1265
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2434
Hal
ton
009D
1571
213
1358
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2435
Hal
ton
009E
1780
187
1593
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2436
Hal
ton
014C
1348
247
1101
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2437
Hal
ton
015D
1494
275
1219
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2438
Hal
ton
014D
1243
320
923
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2439
Hal
ton
015E
1630
373
1257
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2440
Hal
ton
014E
1512
203
1309
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2441
Hal
ton
007D
1891
498
1393
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2442
Hal
ton
006E
1560
368
1192
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2443
Hal
ton
008D
1363
267
1096
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2444
Hal
ton
010D
1142
301
841
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2445
Hal
ton
010E
1293
381
912
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
s://w
ww
.nom
isw
eb.c
o.uk
ON
S C
row
n C
opyr
ight
Res
erve
d [fr
om N
omis
on
3 A
pril
2009
]
mid
-yea
r p
op
ula
tio
n e
stim
ates
2007
pre-
2009
loca
l aut
horit
y: d
istr
ict /
uni
tary
Mal
eF
emal
eT
ota
l
Hal
ton
5800
061
500
1195
00
clai
man
t co
un
t d
eno
min
ato
rs -
cu
rren
t re
sid
ents
/ w
ork
forc
e se
ries
- R
esid
ent
wo
rkin
g a
ge
po
pu
lati
on
Hal
ton
3826
237
029
7529
1
Hal
ton
Hal
ton
No
rth
Wes
tG
reat
Bri
tain
No
rth
Wes
tG
reat
Bri
tain
(nu
mb
ers)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(nu
mb
ers)
(nu
mb
ers)
RE
SID
EN
T P
OP
UL
AT
ION
Note
s:%
is
a pro
port
ion o
f to
tal popula
tion
All
peo
ple
119,5
00
6,8
64,3
00
59,2
16,2
00
Work
ing a
ge
incl
udes
mal
es a
ged
16-6
4 a
nd fem
ales
aged
16-5
9
Mal
es58,0
00
3,3
66,3
00
29,0
54,1
00
Fem
ales
61,5
00
3,4
97,9
00
30,1
62,1
00
All
peo
ple
- w
ork
ing a
ge
75,3
00
63
61.8
62.2
Mal
es -
work
ing a
ge
38,3
00
66
65.8
66.2
Fem
ales
- w
ork
ing a
ge
37,0
00
60.2
57.9
58.3
LA
BO
UR
SU
PP
LY
#S
ampl
e si
ze to
o sm
all f
or r
elia
ble
estim
ate
(see
def
initi
ons)
All
peo
ple
†num
ber
s ar
e fo
r th
ose
aged
16 a
nd o
ver,
% a
re for
those
of w
ork
ing a
ge
(16-5
9/6
4)
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e†
59,1
00
75.6
76.7
78.8
§num
ber
s an
d %
are
for
those
aged
16 a
nd o
ver.
% is
a pro
port
ion o
f ec
onom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e
In e
mplo
ymen
t†55,1
00
70.4
72.1
74.5
Em
plo
yees
†50,4
00
64.6
63.8
64.7
Sel
f em
plo
yed
†4,6
00
5.7
7.8
9.4
Unem
plo
yed (
model
-bas
ed)§
4,0
00
6.7
5.8
5.2
Mal
es
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e†
31,0
00
79
80.6
83.2
In e
mplo
ymen
t†28,6
00
72.8
75.4
78.7
Em
plo
yees
†24,7
00
63.2
63.6
65
Sel
f em
plo
yed
†3,9
00
9.6
11.3
13.3
Unem
plo
yed
§2,4
00
7.9
6.4
5.4
Fem
ales
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ctiv
e†
28,1
00
72
72.5
73.9
In e
mplo
ymen
t†26,5
00
67.9
68.5
70.1
Em
plo
yees
†25,7
00
66
64
64.5
Sel
f em
plo
yed
†700
#4.1
5.2
Unem
plo
yed
§1,6
00
5.6
5.2
5
All p
eo
ple
Note
s:N
um
ber
s an
d %
are
for
those
of w
ork
ing a
ge
Eco
nom
ical
ly inac
tive
18,4
00
24.4
23.3
21.2
% is
a pro
port
ion o
f to
tal w
ork
ing a
ge
popula
tion
Wan
ting a
job
3,9
00
5.1
5.7
5.5
Not
wan
ting a
job
14,6
00
19.3
17.6
15.8
Male
s
Eco
nom
ical
ly inac
tive
8,1
00
21
19.4
16.8
Wan
ting a
job
2,2
00
5.8
5.2
4.6
Not
wan
ting a
job
5,9
00
15.2
14.2
12.2
Fem
ale
s
Eco
nom
ical
ly inac
tive
10,4
00
28
27.5
26.1
Wan
ting a
job
1,6
00
4.4
6.3
6.5
Not
wan
ting a
job
8,7
00
23.6
21.3
19.7
Soc
2000 m
ajor
gro
up 1
-318,2
00
33.1
40.2
43.1
Note
s:N
um
ber
s an
d %
are
for
those
of 16+
1 M
anag
ers
and s
enio
r offic
ials
6,9
00
12.6
14.2
15.4
% is
a pro
port
ion o
f al
l per
sons
in e
mplo
ymen
t
2 P
rofe
ssio
nal
occ
upat
ions
5,1
00
9.2
11.8
12.9
3 A
ssoci
ate
pro
fess
ional
& t
echnic
al6,2
00
11.2
14
14.6
Soc
2000 m
ajor
gro
up 4
-512,2
00
22.3
22.9
22.4
4 A
dm
inis
trat
ive
& s
ecre
tarial
6,9
00
12.6
12.4
11.6
5 S
kille
d t
rades
occ
upat
ions
5,3
00
9.6
10.4
10.8
Soc
2000 m
ajor
gro
up 6
-711,3
00
20.5
16.6
15.8
6 P
erso
nal
ser
vice
occ
upat
ions
4,3
00
7.8
8.3
8.1
7 S
ales
and c
ust
om
er s
ervi
ce o
ccs
7,0
00
12.6
8.3
7.6
Soc
2000 m
ajor
gro
up 8
-913,2
00
24.1
20.4
18.7
8 P
roce
ss p
lant
& m
achin
e oper
ativ
es5,9
00
10.6
8.4
7.2
9 E
lem
enta
ry o
ccupat
ions
7,3
00
13.3
11.9
11.5
NVQ
4 a
nd a
bove
12,2
00
16.2
25.4
28.6
Note
s:Fo
r an
exp
lanat
ion o
f th
e qual
ific
atio
n lev
els
see
the
def
initio
ns
sect
ion.
NVQ
3 a
nd a
bove
24,6
00
32.6
44
46.4
Num
ber
s an
d %
are
for
those
of w
ork
ing a
ge
NVQ
2 a
nd a
bove
43,2
00
57.4
64
64.5
% is
a pro
port
ion o
f to
tal w
ork
ing a
ge
popula
tion
NVQ
1 a
nd a
bove
55,8
00
74.1
78.3
78.1
Oth
er q
ual
ific
atio
ns
4,7
00
6.2
6.7
8.8
No q
ual
ific
atio
ns
14,8
00
19.7
15
13.1
WO
RK
ING
-AG
E B
EN
EF
ITS
Note
:%
is
a pro
port
ion o
f re
siden
t w
ork
ing a
ge
peo
ple
All
peo
ple
4,2
09
5.6
4.3
3.8
Mal
es3,2
95
8.6
6.3
5.5
Fem
ales
914
2.5
2.1
2.1
By a
ge o
f cl
aim
an
tN
ote
:%
is
a pro
port
ion o
f al
l JS
A c
laim
ants
Aged
18-2
41,4
50
34.6
32.6
30.3
Aged
25-4
92,2
20
52.8
53.2
53.7
Aged
50 a
nd o
ver
525
12.5
13.7
15.3
By d
ura
tio
n o
f cl
aim
Up t
o 6
month
s3,2
95
78.4
77.8
78.7
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
s://w
ww
.nom
isw
eb.c
o.uk
ON
S C
row
n C
opyr
ight
Res
erve
d [fr
om N
omis
on
3 A
pril
2009
]
mid
-yea
r p
op
ula
tio
n e
stim
ates
2007
pre-
2009
loca
l aut
horit
y: d
istr
ict /
uni
tary
Mal
eF
emal
eT
ota
l
Hal
ton
5800
061
500
1195
00
clai
man
t co
un
t d
eno
min
ato
rs -
cu
rren
t re
sid
ents
/ w
ork
forc
e se
ries
- R
esid
ent
wo
rkin
g a
ge
po
pu
lati
on
Hal
ton
3826
237
029
7529
1
Hal
ton
Hal
ton
No
rth
Wes
tG
reat
Bri
tain
No
rth
Wes
tG
reat
Bri
tain
(nu
mb
ers)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(nu
mb
ers)
(nu
mb
ers)
Ove
r 6 u
p t
o 1
2 m
onth
s595
14.2
14.2
13.7
Ove
r 12 m
onth
s310
7.4
87.7
Tota
l cl
aim
ants
16,1
00
21.4
17.5
14.2
†Ke y
out-
of-
work
ben
efits
consi
sts
of th
e gro
ups:
job s
eeke
rs,
inca
pac
ity
ben
efits,
lone
par
ents
and o
ther
s on inco
m
Job s
eeke
rs2,5
80
3.4
2.8
2.4
Note
:%
is
a pro
port
ion o
f re
siden
t w
ork
ing a
ge
peo
ple
Inca
pac
ity
ben
efits
8,3
30
11.1
9.2
7
Lone
par
ents
2,2
30
32.2
2
Car
ers
1,2
70
1.7
1.3
1.1
Oth
ers
on inco
me
rela
ted b
enef
its
380
0.5
0.5
0.5
Dis
able
d1,0
60
1.4
1.2
1
Ber
eave
d240
0.3
0.3
0.3
Key
out-
of-
work
ben
efits†
13,5
30
18
14.8
11.9
BU
SIN
ES
SE
SN
ote
:%
is
a pro
port
ion o
f st
ock
(at
end o
f ye
ar)
Reg
istr
atio
ns
340
13.2
10.6
10.2
Der
egis
trat
ions
190
7.4
7.5
7.3
Sto
ck (
at e
nd o
f ye
ar)
2,5
80
--
-
Sourc
e: B
ERR -
vat
reg
istr
atio
ns/
der
egis
trat
ions
by
indust
ry
Unfille
d jobce
ntr
e va
canci
es (
num
ber
s)302
23,5
40
238,5
54
Unfille
d jobce
ntr
e va
canci
es p
er 1
0,0
00 w
ork
ing a
ge
popula
tion
40
56
65
JSA c
laim
ants
per
unfille
d jobce
ntr
e va
cancy
13.9
7.8
5.9
LA
BO
UR
DE
MA
ND
Hal
ton
Hal
ton
No
rth
Wes
tG
reat
Bri
tain
(jo
bs)
(den
sity
)(d
ensi
ty)
(den
sity
)
Jobs
den
sity
61,0
00
0.8
10.8
50.8
8N
ote
s:The
den
sity
fig
ure
s re
pre
sent
the
ratio o
f to
tal jo
bs
to w
ork
ing-a
ge
popula
tion.
Tota
l jo
bs
incl
udes
em
plo
yees
, se
lf-e
mplo
yed,
gove
rnm
ent-
support
ed t
rain
ees
and H
M F
orc
es
Hal
ton
No
rth
Wes
tG
reat
Bri
tain
So
urc
e: O
NS
an
nu
al s
urv
ey o
f h
ou
rs a
nd
ear
nin
gs
- re
sid
ent
anal
ysis
(po
un
ds)
(po
un
ds)
(po
un
ds)
Gro
ss w
eekl
y p
ay
Full-
tim
e w
ork
ers
419.1
451.3
479.3
Mal
e fu
ll-tim
e w
ork
ers
479.7
494.1
525
Fem
ale
full-
tim
e w
ork
ers
341.5
389.1
412.7
Ho
url
y p
ay
Full-
tim
e w
ork
ers
10.5
711.4
12.0
1
Mal
e fu
ll-tim
e w
ork
ers
12.1
912
12.7
2
Fem
ale
full-
tim
e w
ork
ers
9.5
910.4
110.9
6
So
urc
e: O
NS
an
nu
al s
urv
ey o
f h
ou
rs a
nd
ear
nin
gs
- w
ork
pla
ce a
nal
ysis
Gro
ss w
eekl
y p
ay
Full-
tim
e w
ork
ers
482.7
450.2
479.1
Mal
e fu
ll-tim
e w
ork
ers
527.3
489.9
523.5
Fem
ale
full-
tim
e w
ork
ers
388.3
392.1
412.4
Ho
url
y p
ay
Full-
tim
e w
ork
ers
11.5
911.3
612
Mal
e fu
ll-tim
e w
ork
ers
12.4
511.9
612.6
9
Fem
ale
full-
tim
e w
ork
ers
10.3
410.4
610.9
5
Hal
ton
Hal
ton
No
rth
Wes
tG
reat
Bri
tain
(em
plo
yee
job
s)(%
)(%
)(%
)
Tota
l em
plo
yee
jobs
54,4
00
--
--
Dat
a unav
aila
ble
Full-
tim
e39,8
00
73.1
69.2
69
†Tourism
consi
sts
of in
dust
ries
that
are
als
o p
art
of th
e se
rvic
es indust
ry (
see
the
def
initio
ns
sect
ion)
Part
-tim
e14,6
00
26.9
30.8
31
Note
s:%
is
a pro
port
ion o
f to
tal em
plo
yee
jobs
Em
plo
yee
jobs
excl
udes
sel
f-em
plo
yed,
gove
rnm
ent-
support
ed t
rain
ees
and H
M F
orc
es
Man
ufa
cturing
7,3
00
13.5
12.4
10.6
Const
ruct
ion
2,7
00
4.9
5.1
4.9
Ser
vice
s44,2
00
81.1
81.6
83
Dis
trib
ution,
hote
ls &
res
taura
nts
13,0
00
23.9
23.7
23.3
Tra
nsp
ort
& c
om
munic
atio
ns
6,4
00
11.7
5.6
5.9
Finan
ce,
IT,
oth
er b
usi
nes
s ac
tivi
ties
11,6
00
21.4
19.4
21.6
Public
adm
in,
educa
tion &
hea
lth
10,7
00
19.7
28.2
26.9
Oth
er s
ervi
ces
2,4
00
4.5
4.6
5.2
Tourism
-rel
ated
†3,3
00
68.4
8.2
Em
plo
yee
jobs
by
indust
ry
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
TO
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
DA
TA
SE
T_T
ITL
EPo
pu
lati
on
(U
V01
)H
EA
DIN
GA
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1
GE
O_H
IER
AR
CHN
eSS
Geo
grap
hy H
iera
rchy
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T_U
NIT
All
Peo
ple
Peo
ple
resi
dent
in
hous
ehol
dsP
eopl
e re
side
nt in
C
omm
unal
Est
ablis
hmen
ts
Peo
ple
resi
dent
in C
omm
unal
E
stab
lishm
ents
, of w
hich
Peo
ple
Sle
epin
g R
ough
ST
AT
IST
ICA
L_U
NIT
Cou
ntC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
GB
_NA
ME
EW
_NA
ME
CT
RY
_NA
ME
Reg
ion
Co
un
tyL
AG
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
nd49
1388
3148
2481
5089
0681
836
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Wal
es29
0308
528
5948
943
596
107
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
5204
1916
5110
7639
9342
7794
3G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
t67
2976
466
1567
211
4092
77G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ire67
3788
6649
2988
595
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
Nor
th W
est
Che
shire
Hal
ton
1182
0811
7195
1013
0G
OR
_NA
ME
LA
_NA
ME
MS
OA
_CO
DE
MS
OA
_NA
ME
LS
OA
_CO
DE
LS
OA
_NA
ME
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2367
Hal
ton
007A
1484
1484
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2368
Hal
ton
003A
1693
1657
360
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2369
Hal
ton
005A
1493
1490
30
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2370
Hal
ton
007B
1720
1688
320
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2371
Hal
ton
016A
1347
1347
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2372
Hal
ton
016B
1251
1251
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2373
Hal
ton
016C
1386
1386
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2374
Hal
ton
002A
1580
1580
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2375
Hal
ton
002B
1396
1396
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2376
Hal
ton
002C
1473
1473
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2377
Hal
ton
004A
1803
1797
60
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2378
Hal
ton
006A
1600
1600
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2379
Hal
ton
006B
1542
1531
110
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2380
Hal
ton
006C
1503
1464
390
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2381
Hal
ton
010A
1644
1615
290
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2382
Hal
ton
010B
1508
1508
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2383
Hal
ton
013A
1690
1686
40
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2384
Hal
ton
010C
1587
1584
30
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2385
Hal
ton
009A
1338
1323
150
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2386
Hal
ton
009B
1431
1431
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2387
Hal
ton
009C
1137
1137
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2388
Hal
ton
006D
1617
1609
80
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2389
Hal
ton
008A
1689
1689
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2390
Hal
ton
004B
1534
1477
570
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2391
Hal
ton
008B
1409
1409
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2392
Hal
ton
001A
1348
1348
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2393
Hal
ton
001B
1540
1481
590
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2394
Hal
ton
005B
1501
1478
230
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2395
Hal
ton
001C
1518
1514
40
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2396
Hal
ton
013B
1540
1475
650
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2397
Hal
ton
013C
1434
1434
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2398
Hal
ton
011A
1178
1178
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2399
Hal
ton
013D
1477
1477
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2400
Hal
ton
011B
1236
1236
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2401
Hal
ton
008C
1898
1898
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2402
Hal
ton
011C
1527
1477
500
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2403
Hal
ton
013E
1574
1574
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2404
Hal
ton
011D
1485
1485
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2405
Hal
ton
011E
2011
2011
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2406
Hal
ton
015A
1477
1477
00
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2407
Hal
ton
015B
1523
1502
210
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2408
Hal
ton
013F
1934
1909
250
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2409
Hal
ton
015C
1479
1351
128
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
10H
alto
n 00
3B13
5413
540
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0124
11H
alto
n 00
1D14
3014
273
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
12H
alto
n 00
3C13
1612
9422
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
13H
alto
n 00
3D14
5013
7971
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
14H
alto
n 00
3E13
3613
360
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0124
15H
alto
n 01
6D14
3014
300
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
16H
alto
n 01
2A14
2713
8641
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
17H
alto
n 01
2B11
5911
590
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0124
18H
alto
n 01
6E14
9114
910
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
19H
alto
n 00
4C12
4112
410
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
20H
alto
n 00
4D15
3415
0430
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0124
21H
alto
n 00
2D13
9413
940
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
22H
alto
n 00
4E14
5214
520
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0124
23H
alto
n 00
2E14
4614
2422
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0124
24H
alto
n 00
7C15
1115
110
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0124
25H
alto
n 00
5C15
8815
880
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0124
26H
alto
n 00
5D13
3013
264
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0124
27H
alto
n 00
5E16
6716
670
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
28H
alto
n 01
2C16
2016
0515
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
29H
alto
n 01
2D14
3314
330
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
30H
alto
n 01
2E14
8614
4442
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
31H
alto
n 01
2F16
0715
8225
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
32H
alto
n 01
4A15
2115
210
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
33H
alto
n 01
4B16
2216
220
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0124
34H
alto
n 00
9D15
7115
4031
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0124
35H
alto
n 00
9E17
8017
746
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
36H
alto
n 01
4C13
4813
480
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
37H
alto
n 01
5D14
9414
940
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
38H
alto
n 01
4D12
4312
358
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
39H
alto
n 01
5E16
3016
300
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
40H
alto
n 01
4E15
1215
093
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0124
41H
alto
n 00
7D18
9118
838
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0124
42H
alto
n 00
6E15
6015
600
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0124
43H
alto
n 00
8D13
6313
0063
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0124
44H
alto
n 01
0D11
4211
420
0N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0124
45H
alto
n 01
0E12
9312
930
0
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1D
AT
AS
ET
_TIT
LE
Qu
alif
icat
ion
s an
d S
tud
ents
(K
S13
)T
OA
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
GE
O_H
IER
AR
CH
YN
eSS
Geo
grap
hy H
iera
rchy
HE
AD
ING
All
peop
le a
ged
16-7
4
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: N
o qu
alifi
catio
ns
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: N
o qu
alifi
catio
ns
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: H
ighe
st
qual
ifica
tion
atta
ined
leve
l 1
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: H
ighe
st
qual
ifica
tion
atta
ined
leve
l 1
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: H
ighe
st
qual
ifica
tion
atta
ined
leve
l 2
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: H
ighe
st
qual
ifica
tion
atta
ined
leve
l 2
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: H
ighe
st
qual
ifica
tion
atta
ined
leve
l 3
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: H
ighe
st
qual
ifica
tion
atta
ined
leve
l 3
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: H
ighe
st
qual
ifica
tion
atta
ined
leve
l 4 /
5
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: H
ighe
st
qual
ifica
tion
atta
ined
leve
l 4 /
5
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T_U
NIT
Cou
ntC
ount
Per
cent
age
Cou
ntP
erce
ntag
eC
ount
Per
cent
age
Cou
ntP
erce
ntag
eC
ount
Per
cent
age
ST
AT
IST
ICA
L_U
NIT
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
GB
_NA
ME
EW
_NA
ME
CT
RY
_NA
ME
Reg
ion
Co
un
tyL
AD
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
3553
2091
1025
1674
28.8
559
0909
316
.63
6877
530
19.3
629
6228
28.
3470
7205
219
.9G
reat
Brit
ain
En g
land
and
Wal
esW
ales
2075
347
6853
6833
.02
3209
4015
.46
4105
4419
.78
1478
537.
1236
0910
17.3
9G
reat
Brit
ain
En g
land
and
Wal
es37
6074
3810
9370
4229
.08
6230
033
16.5
772
8807
419
.38
3110
135
8.27
7432
962
19.7
6G
reat
Brit
ain
En g
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
t48
3966
915
4352
431
.89
8087
1816
.71
9402
9219
.43
3749
857.
7583
0945
17.1
7G
reat
Brit
ain
En g
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ire48
9125
1255
0425
.66
7688
815
.72
1020
3120
.86
3886
37.
9511
2714
23.0
4G
reat
Brit
ain
En g
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ireH
alto
n85
645
2968
934
.67
1617
318
.88
1831
021
.38
5537
6.47
9691
11.3
2G
OR
_NA
ME
LA
_NA
ME
MS
OA
_CO
DE
MS
OA
_NA
ME
LS
OA
_CO
DE
LS
OA
_NA
ME
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
80H
alto
n 00
7E
0101
2367
Hal
ton
007A
1016
497
48.9
219
619
.29
180
17.7
233
3.25
595.
81N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0123
68H
alto
n 00
3A11
7643
436
.921
318
.11
248
21.0
982
6.97
109
9.27
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2369
Hal
ton
005A
1075
414
38.5
119
618
.23
222
20.6
566
6.14
968.
93N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0123
70H
alto
n 00
7B12
3940
632
.77
284
22.9
228
322
.84
866.
9410
78.
64N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0123
71H
alto
n 01
6A10
3522
721
.93
194
18.7
425
925
.02
101
9.76
171
16.5
2N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0123
72H
alto
n 01
6B10
0521
621
.49
182
18.1
125
925
.77
969.
5515
915
.82
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2373
Hal
ton
016C
1164
305
26.2
203
17.4
426
422
.68
837.
1317
715
.21
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2374
Hal
ton
002A
1173
185
15.7
720
417
.39
300
25.5
812
610
.74
282
24.0
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
75H
alto
n 00
2B10
2315
715
.35
180
17.6
210
20.5
387
8.5
308
30.1
1N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
76H
alto
n 00
2C10
2511
511
.22
250
24.3
924
123
.51
868.
3928
227
.51
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2377
Hal
ton
004A
1332
544
40.8
425
619
.22
290
21.7
769
5.18
926.
91N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
78H
alto
n 00
6A12
6045
536
.11
204
16.1
928
022
.22
645.
0814
311
.35
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2379
Hal
ton
006B
1131
422
37.3
121
519
.01
247
21.8
472
6.37
837.
34N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
80H
alto
n 00
6C10
3349
047
.43
186
18.0
118
718
.141
3.97
565.
42N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
81H
alto
n 01
0A12
3058
547
.56
246
2022
318
.13
645.
249
3.98
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2382
Hal
ton
010B
1100
513
46.6
421
819
.82
203
18.4
539
3.55
524.
73N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
83H
alto
n 01
3A12
7847
437
.09
234
18.3
126
520
.74
675.
2411
89.
23N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
84H
alto
n 01
0C12
2944
436
.13
212
17.2
523
919
.45
776.
2715
212
.37
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2385
Hal
ton
009A
1003
154
15.3
515
415
.35
235
23.4
392
9.17
298
29.7
1N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
86H
alto
n 00
9B10
0110
310
.29
202
20.1
827
827
.77
999.
8926
426
.37
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2387
Hal
ton
009C
881
228
25.8
813
415
.21
194
22.0
260
6.81
212
24.0
6N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
88H
alto
n 00
6D11
1050
945
.86
184
16.5
823
921
.53
423.
7866
5.95
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2389
Hal
ton
008A
1346
419
31.1
322
716
.86
261
19.3
910
67.
8818
813
.97
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2390
Hal
ton
004B
1137
474
41.6
919
517
.15
202
17.7
763
5.54
988.
62N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0123
91H
alto
n 00
8B10
4843
641
.621
220
.23
198
18.8
954
5.15
656.
2N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0123
92H
alto
n 00
1A98
920
320
.53
217
21.9
423
924
.17
808.
0916
917
.09
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2393
Hal
ton
001B
1147
249
21.7
117
915
.61
224
19.5
384
7.32
307
26.7
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0123
94H
alto
n 00
5B10
3435
634
.43
190
18.3
821
520
.79
747.
1612
411
.99
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
74H
alto
n 00
1E
0101
2395
Hal
ton
001C
1169
293
25.0
620
017
.11
261
22.3
389
7.61
237
20.2
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
96H
alto
n 01
3B11
0253
248
.28
195
17.7
220
19.9
641
3.72
443.
99N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
97H
alto
n 01
3C97
545
346
.46
201
20.6
218
518
.97
323.
2842
4.31
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
84H
alto
n 01
1E
0101
2398
Hal
ton
011A
829
296
35.7
114
617
.61
175
21.1
151
6.15
9611
.58
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
86H
alto
n 01
3E
0101
2399
Hal
ton
013D
1057
465
43.9
923
121
.85
198
18.7
344
4.16
514.
82N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
00H
alto
n 01
1B89
129
433
178
19.9
820
022
.45
717.
9791
10.2
1N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0124
01H
alto
n 00
8C14
9446
631
.19
227
15.1
929
019
.41
110
7.36
271
18.1
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
02H
alto
n 01
1C10
3445
844
.29
187
18.0
921
420
.753
5.13
504.
84N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0124
03H
alto
n 01
3E10
7952
248
.38
178
16.5
206
19.0
951
4.73
433.
99N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
04H
alto
n 01
1D11
4440
535
.421
718
.97
262
22.9
706.
1210
99.
53N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
05H
alto
n 01
1E14
3847
733
.17
278
19.3
332
722
.74
946.
5414
410
.01
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2406
Hal
ton
015A
1091
368
33.7
322
820
.924
522
.46
756.
8710
39.
44N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
07H
alto
n 01
5B11
0047
042
.73
207
18.8
222
620
.55
555
625.
64N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0124
08H
alto
n 01
3F12
4452
041
.826
421
.22
241
19.3
767
5.39
725.
79N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
09H
alto
n 01
5C10
0939
338
.95
212
21.0
121
421
.21
545.
3568
6.74
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2410
Hal
ton
003B
1051
242
23.0
320
019
.03
260
24.7
410
610
.09
157
14.9
4N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0124
11H
alto
n 00
1D10
4234
032
.63
202
19.3
922
321
.470
6.72
118
11.3
2N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
12H
alto
n 00
3C95
442
244
.23
170
17.8
219
520
.44
555.
7754
5.66
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2413
Hal
ton
003D
946
391
41.3
319
020
.08
193
20.4
485.
0756
5.92
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
76H
alto
n 00
3E
0101
2414
Hal
ton
003E
1023
313
30.6
189
18.4
826
325
.71
797.
7297
9.48
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2415
Hal
ton
016D
1123
272
24.2
221
619
.23
282
25.1
192
8.19
157
13.9
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
16H
alto
n 01
2A98
429
329
.78
140
14.2
320
921
.24
636.
418
018
.29
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2417
Hal
ton
012B
822
277
33.7
178
21.6
519
123
.24
495.
9668
8.27
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
89H
alto
n 01
6E
0101
2418
Hal
ton
016E
1168
311
26.6
315
513
.27
224
19.1
810
69.
0824
120
.63
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2419
Hal
ton
004C
909
391
43.0
117
519
.25
202
22.2
247
5.17
454.
95N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
20H
alto
n 00
4D10
7048
044
.86
200
18.6
919
718
.41
474.
3974
6.92
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2421
Hal
ton
002D
1082
237
21.9
215
19.8
726
124
.12
837.
6721
019
.41
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
77H
alto
n 00
4E
0101
2422
Hal
ton
004E
966
427
44.2
195
20.1
918
719
.36
495.
0764
6.63
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
75H
alto
n 00
2E
0101
2423
Hal
ton
002E
1087
276
25.3
922
420
.61
232
21.3
486
7.91
191
17.5
7N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0124
24H
alto
n 00
7C10
1650
449
.61
175
17.2
217
216
.93
504.
9249
4.82
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2425
Hal
ton
005C
1112
480
43.1
723
821
.419
317
.36
423.
7878
7.01
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
78H
alto
n 00
5E
0101
2426
Hal
ton
005D
996
258
25.9
144
14.4
624
024
.174
7.43
197
19.7
8N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0124
27H
alto
n 00
5E11
7940
634
.44
243
20.6
124
420
.710
18.
5712
310
.43
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2428
Hal
ton
012C
1105
345
31.2
221
619
.55
245
22.1
785
7.69
134
12.1
3N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
29H
alto
n 01
2D99
438
939
.13
174
17.5
121
821
.93
474.
7381
8.15
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2430
Hal
ton
012E
1019
427
41.9
186
18.2
520
019
.63
716.
9762
6.08
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
85H
alto
n 01
2E
0101
2431
Hal
ton
012F
1209
404
33.4
224
119
.93
289
23.9
796.
5312
410
.26
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
87H
alto
n 01
4E
0101
2432
Hal
ton
014A
1178
358
30.3
925
021
.22
272
23.0
910
28.
6610
89.
17N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
33H
alto
n 01
4B11
4344
939
.28
225
19.6
921
718
.99
827.
1797
8.49
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2434
Hal
ton
009D
1184
251
21.2
249
21.0
327
923
.56
978.
1922
719
.17
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
82H
alto
n 00
9E
0101
2435
Hal
ton
009E
1331
225
16.9
275
20.6
633
925
.47
118
8.87
294
22.0
9N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
36H
alto
n 01
4C89
838
242
.54
166
18.4
919
721
.94
515.
6837
4.12
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2437
Hal
ton
015D
1041
415
39.8
724
023
.05
212
20.3
751
4.9
545.
19N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
38H
alto
n 01
4D84
135
742
.45
154
18.3
118
922
.47
384.
5254
6.42
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
88H
alto
n 01
5E
0101
2439
Hal
ton
015E
1155
472
40.8
721
118
.27
252
21.8
261
5.28
706.
06N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
40H
alto
n 01
4E11
7331
927
.226
322
.42
298
25.4
958.
111
49.
72N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0124
41H
alto
n 00
7D13
1558
444
.41
243
18.4
826
320
705.
3288
6.69
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
79H
alto
n 00
6E
0101
2442
Hal
ton
006E
1000
454
45.4
200
2019
119
.150
538
3.8
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
81H
alto
n 00
8E
0101
2443
Hal
ton
008D
979
301
30.7
520
821
.25
227
23.1
975
7.66
979.
91N
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0124
44H
alto
n 01
0D77
438
149
.22
133
17.1
815
319
.77
263.
3634
4.39
Nor
th W
est
Hal
ton
E02
0025
83H
alto
n 01
0E
0101
2445
Hal
ton
010E
900
430
47.7
817
419
.33
152
16.8
942
4.67
505.
56
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
DA
TA
SE
T_T
ITL
EQ
ual
ific
atio
ns
and
Stu
den
ts (
KS
13)
TO
GE
O_H
IER
AR
CH
YN
eSS
Geo
grap
hy H
iera
rchy
HE
AD
ING
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T_U
NIT
ST
AT
IST
ICA
L_U
NIT
GB
_NA
ME
EW
_NA
ME
CT
RY
_NA
ME
Reg
ion
Co
un
tyL
AG
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndG
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esW
ales
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
Nor
th W
est
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
Nor
th W
est
Che
shire
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
n gla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
Nor
th W
est
Che
shire
Hal
ton
GO
R_N
AM
EL
A_N
AM
EM
SO
A_C
OD
EM
SO
A_N
AM
EL
SO
A_C
OD
EL
SO
A_N
AM
EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0123
67H
alto
n 00
7AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0123
68H
alto
n 00
3AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0123
69H
alto
n 00
5AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0123
70H
alto
n 00
7BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0123
71H
alto
n 01
6AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0123
72H
alto
n 01
6BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0123
73H
alto
n 01
6CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
74H
alto
n 00
2AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
75H
alto
n 00
2BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0123
76H
alto
n 00
2CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0123
77H
alto
n 00
4AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
78H
alto
n 00
6AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
79H
alto
n 00
6BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
80H
alto
n 00
6CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
81H
alto
n 01
0AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
82H
alto
n 01
0BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
83H
alto
n 01
3AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0123
84H
alto
n 01
0CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
85H
alto
n 00
9AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
86H
alto
n 00
9BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0123
87H
alto
n 00
9CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0123
88H
alto
n 00
6DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0123
89H
alto
n 00
8AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0123
90H
alto
n 00
4BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0123
91H
alto
n 00
8BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0123
92H
alto
n 00
1AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0123
93H
alto
n 00
1BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0123
94H
alto
n 00
5BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0123
95H
alto
n 00
1CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
96H
alto
n 01
3BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
97H
alto
n 01
3CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0123
98H
alto
n 01
1AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0123
99H
alto
n 01
3DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
00H
alto
n 01
1BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0124
01H
alto
n 00
8CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
02H
alto
n 01
1CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0124
03H
alto
n 01
3EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
04H
alto
n 01
1DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2584
Hal
ton
011
E01
0124
05H
alto
n 01
1EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
06H
alto
n 01
5AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
07H
alto
n 01
5BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2586
Hal
ton
013
E01
0124
08H
alto
n 01
3FN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
09H
alto
n 01
5CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
10H
alto
n 00
3BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2574
Hal
ton
001
E01
0124
11H
alto
n 00
1DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
12H
alto
n 00
3CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
13H
alto
n 00
3DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2576
Hal
ton
003
E01
0124
14H
alto
n 00
3EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0124
15H
alto
n 01
6DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
16H
alto
n 01
2AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
17H
alto
n 01
2BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2589
Hal
ton
016
E01
0124
18H
alto
n 01
6EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
19H
alto
n 00
4CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
20H
alto
n 00
4DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0124
21H
alto
n 00
2DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2577
Hal
ton
004
E01
0124
22H
alto
n 00
4EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2575
Hal
ton
002
E01
0124
23H
alto
n 00
2EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0124
24H
alto
n 00
7CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0124
25H
alto
n 00
5CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0124
26H
alto
n 00
5DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2578
Hal
ton
005
E01
0124
27H
alto
n 00
5EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
28H
alto
n 01
2CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
29H
alto
n 01
2DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
30H
alto
n 01
2EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2585
Hal
ton
012
E01
0124
31H
alto
n 01
2FN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
32H
alto
n 01
4AN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
33H
alto
n 01
4BN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0124
34H
alto
n 00
9DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2582
Hal
ton
009
E01
0124
35H
alto
n 00
9EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
36H
alto
n 01
4CN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
37H
alto
n 01
5DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
38H
alto
n 01
4DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2588
Hal
ton
015
E01
0124
39H
alto
n 01
5EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2587
Hal
ton
014
E01
0124
40H
alto
n 01
4EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2580
Hal
ton
007
E01
0124
41H
alto
n 00
7DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2579
Hal
ton
006
E01
0124
42H
alto
n 00
6EN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2581
Hal
ton
008
E01
0124
43H
alto
n 00
8DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0124
44H
alto
n 01
0DN
orth
Wes
tH
alto
nE
0200
2583
Hal
ton
010
E01
0124
45H
alto
n 01
0E
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Apr
-200
1A
pr-2
001
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: O
ther
qu
alifi
catio
ns /
leve
l unk
now
n
Peo
ple
aged
16-
74 w
ith: O
ther
qu
alifi
catio
ns /
leve
l unk
now
n
Tot
al n
umbe
r of
fu
ll-tim
e st
uden
ts a
nd
scho
olch
ildre
n:
Age
d 16
-17
Tot
al n
umbe
r of
fu
ll-tim
e st
uden
ts a
nd
scho
olch
ildre
n:
Age
d 18
-74
Ful
l-tim
e st
uden
ts a
ged
18-7
4:
Eco
nom
ical
ly
activ
e: in
em
ploy
men
t
Ful
l-tim
e st
uden
ts a
ged
18-7
4:
Eco
nom
ical
ly
activ
e: in
em
ploy
men
t
Ful
l-tim
e st
uden
ts a
ged
18-7
4:
Eco
nom
ical
ly
activ
e:
Une
mpl
oyed
Ful
l-tim
e st
uden
ts a
ged
18-7
4:
Eco
nom
ical
ly
activ
e:
Une
mpl
oyed
Ful
l-tim
e st
uden
ts a
ged
18-7
4:
Eco
nom
ical
ly
inac
tive
Ful
l-tim
e st
uden
ts a
ged
18-7
4:
Eco
nom
ical
ly
inac
tive
Cou
ntP
erce
ntag
eC
ount
Cou
ntC
ount
Per
cent
age
Cou
ntP
erce
ntag
eC
ount
Per
cent
age
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
Per
sons
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
DA
TA
_VA
LU
ED
AT
A_V
AL
UE
2459
460
6.92
9552
1715
4351
251
2872
33.2
379
457
5.15
9511
8261
.62
1497
327.
2159
067
9119
627
432
30.0
839
874.
3759
777
65.5
526
0919
26.
9410
1428
416
3470
854
0304
33.0
583
444
5.1
1010
959
61.8
434
1205
7.05
1352
5520
1880
6915
734
.26
1072
15.
3112
2002
60.4
333
125
6.77
1322
015
597
6431
41.2
364
74.
1585
1954
.62
6245
7.29
2625
2189
933
42.6
214
36.
5311
1350
.85
515.
0230
269
34.6
24
15.3
813
5090
7.65
3931
1135
.48
00
1961
.29
817.
5333
2813
46.4
30
014
5073
5.89
2935
1542
.86
38.
5717
48.5
783
8.02
4823
1252
.17
00
1147
.83
939.
2539
3019
63.3
30
011
36.6
713
211
.34
3244
2659
.09
00
1840
.91
766.
4839
4624
52.1
73
6.52
2145
.65
817.
9237
3518
51.4
30
017
48.5
751
4.98
2720
1365
315
630
816.
0844
3620
55.5
65
13.8
911
30.5
611
49.
0555
2414
58.3
33
12.5
833
.33
928.
1340
3015
500
014
46.6
773
7.07
2923
939
.13
00
1460
.87
635.
1235
3013
43.3
30
015
5075
6.82
2624
625
00
1875
120
9.39
2927
1140
.74
311
.11
1348
.15
105
8.54
2741
1741
.46
00
2356
.170
6.98
2010
330
00
660
555.
4942
148
57.1
43
21.4
35
35.7
153
6.02
3215
533
.33
00
960
706.
3128
218
38.1
314
.29
1152
.38
145
10.7
744
4017
42.5
37.
520
5010
59.
2332
1710
58.8
20
07
41.1
883
7.92
2623
939
.13
313
.04
1147
.83
818.
1927
3419
55.8
85
14.7
110
29.4
110
49.
0726
3613
36.1
10
023
63.8
975
7.25
2737
821
.62
38.
1127
72.9
789
7.61
2832
1856
.25
00
1340
.63
706.
3534
196
31.5
84
21.0
59
47.3
762
6.36
3121
733
.33
00
1466
.67
657.
8431
217
33.3
33
14.2
911
52.3
868
6.43
3323
626
.09
00
1669
.57
576.
426
146
42.8
60
08
57.1
413
08.
744
5529
52.7
33
5.45
2341
.82
726.
9640
218
38.1
00
1257
.14
797.
3228
207
353
1510
5081
7.08
3127
1244
.44
00
1555
.56
118
8.21
4153
2139
.62
59.
4327
50.9
472
6.6
2329
1137
.93
00
1758
.62
807.
2730
207
353
1511
5580
6.43
4632
618
.75
39.
3823
71.8
868
6.74
2420
945
315
1050
868.
1837
3816
42.1
13
7.89
1950
898.
5418
2612
46.1
50
013
5058
6.08
1823
1043
.48
00
1252
.17
687.
1929
2111
52.3
80
08
38.1
828.
0237
3219
59.3
83
9.38
1134
.38
104
9.26
3738
1642
.11
00
2155
.26
9910
.06
2319
526
.32
315
.79
1157
.89
597.
1820
104
400
06
6013
111
.22
3330
1343
.33
310
1446
.67
495.
3933
2710
37.0
43
11.1
116
59.2
672
6.73
2332
1340
.63
39.
3817
53.1
376
7.02
3740
1640
37.
521
52.5
444.
5536
248
33.3
30
015
62.5
787.
1824
2912
41.3
84
13.7
913
44.8
366
6.5
4436
925
00
2569
.44
817.
2834
3110
32.2
60
019
61.2
983
8.33
3426
1038
.46
00
1557
.69
625.
2648
299
31.0
33
10.3
419
65.5
280
7.24
3738
2155
.26
37.
8914
36.8
485
8.55
2714
642
.86
00
750
737.
1629
166
37.5
318
.75
850
725.
9616
2511
443
1212
4888
7.47
3030
1033
.33
310
1756
.67
736.
3935
3012
403
1016
53.3
381
6.84
3320
525
315
1365
806.
0151
2816
57.1
40
010
35.7
165
7.24
3825
416
416
1768
696.
6339
2411
45.8
30
013
54.1
749
5.83
3223
834
.78
313
.04
1460
.87
897.
7147
3615
41.6
70
019
52.7
884
7.16
4236
2261
.11
38.
3312
33.3
367
5.1
3222
522
.73
418
.18
1359
.09
676.
743
2113
61.9
00
838
.171
7.25
3134
2058
.82
38.
8211
32.3
547
6.07
3622
1150
313
.64
836
.36
525.
7830
279
33.3
33
11.1
115
55.5
6
Dow
nloa
ded
from
http
://w
ww
.nei
ghbo
urho
od.s
tatis
tics.
gov.
uk
FR
OM
Jan-
2003
DA
TA
SE
T_T
ITL
ES
tan
dar
dis
ed M
ort
alit
y R
atio
s 20
03T
OD
ec-2
003
GE
O_H
IER
AR
CH
YN
eSS
Geo
grap
hy H
iera
rchy
HE
AD
ING
Sta
ndar
dise
d M
orta
lity
Rat
ios
ME
AS
UR
EM
EN
T_U
NIT
Rat
eS
TA
TIS
TIC
AL
_UN
ITP
erso
nsG
B_N
AM
EE
W_N
AM
EC
TR
Y_N
AM
ER
egio
nC
ou
nty
LA
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
99G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esW
ales
105
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
100
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
Nor
th W
est
110
Gre
at B
ritai
nE
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
Eng
land
Nor
th W
est
Che
shire
96G
reat
Brit
ain
Eng
land
and
Wal
esE
ngla
ndN
orth
Wes
tC
hesh
ireH
alto
n12
0
APPENDIX 14
SolutionsLessons for policy and practice
Local initiatives to help workless people find and keep paid work
www.jrf.org.uk
AuthorPamela Meadows, drawing on a wide range of research by JRF and others.
June 2008
What’s the issue?
With concentrations of people disadvantaged in the labour market, disadvantaged areas tend to have high rates of worklessness. But both the kinds of work available and the kinds of people without work vary between areas.
Solutions need to be local, reflecting the kind of jobs people are likely to be able to get, and the individuals living in the area and their individual problems.
Ways forward
The available evidence points to some lessons for policy and practice, particularly within the Government’s new Working Neighbourhoods Fund:
of long-term sick and disabled people, is essential.
some initial training, but this is much more expensive and delays the start of employment.
engaged with the needs of local employers.
being in the right job, with suitable hours, skills and location.
people’s ability to get and keep jobs.
childcare and substance use issues as well as labour market needs, are more effective than those which address work in isolation.
wide range of support.
encouragement to engage with the help and support available.
What are the challenges?
place to place. In some areas, capacity will need to be developed before effective delivery can take place.
resources, and may slow down delivery.
recent migrants face both the disadvantages of deprived areas and additional barriers. But minority communities are also becoming increasingly diverse in their labour market experience.
the system.
2
The case for changeDisadvantaged areas tend to have high rates of worklessness, but the nature of the jobs available to people in these areas, and the composition of the workless population, vary between areas – therefore local solutions are needed.
The evidence shows that:
Work and Opportunity research programme) are:– bridges into work and barriers to entry; – the distribution of work between different groups in the population; – the need for evidence from real initiatives
to improve local job prospects; – employers’ policies and behaviour.
One common issue was the importance of local labour markets and local delivery systems. Most people in Britain look for work within a limited geographical area.
levels for whom there is a national labour market. Nationally, those in elementary and personal service occupations have the lowest median travel to work distance (less than three kilometres) while those in professional occupations have the highest (around seven kilometres).
Distances are generally higher in London for all groups, but particularly for those with higher-level skills. Travel distances tend to be lower in the inner parts of cities, which is often where workless people with low skill levels are concentrated (Green and Owen 2006; Green and White 2007).
What constitutes the local labour market varies by skill level, but most people’s jobs, even at intermediate and higher skill levels,
workless people into work need to recognise this (DCLG 2006).
Possible ways forwardThis study draws on the evidence on interventions to help workless people into paid employment and pulls out key messages for the Working Neighbourhoods Fund (WNF), which is intended to support councils and communities in getting people in the most deprived areas of England back to work.
The evidence is derived from JRF’s Work and Opportunity and Area Regeneration programmes previously described in What Works Locally? (Campbell and Meadows 2001) and updated in the light of more recent research and evaluation evidence, including the evidence derived from the JRF Neighbourhood programme (Taylor et al 2007).
The evidence related to local interventions is only derived from the UK. Although there is a great deal of international evidence available on the impact of interventions to tackle worklessness (Meadows 2006), the focus of this review on the importance of place means that international evidence may not reflect the particular circumstances of communities in Britain.
The review is based around six key themes:
Traditionally there has been a separation between interventions aimed at helping disadvantaged people and interventions aimed at helping disadvantaged places. More recently there has been a recognition that places may be disadvantaged because they contain concentrations of disadvantaged individuals, and that interventions to deal with both the consequences of the concentration and meeting the needs of individuals need to work more closely together (Taylor et al 2007; North et al 2007). It is in recognition of the evidence supporting more localised approaches that the Department for Work and Pensions has recently changed the emphasis of national welfare to work programmes in the direction of greater local flexibility (DWP 2007, 2006).
Worklessness lies at the root of area deprivation (Forrest and Kearns 1999; McGregor et al 2003;
Sanderson 2006; North et al 2007). This is the principle underlying the Working Neighbourhoods Fund (DCLG 2007a). This review therefore includes evidence derived from research and evaluation studies where the main focus is on individuals as well as those where the main focus is on places. The unifying issue is that of worklessness: both unemployment as traditionally measured – that is based on those who are actively seeking work – and other forms of worklessness, including people who are not working through sickness or disability and lone parenthood.
One important relationship between place and worklessness lies in the fact that disadvantaged areas may lack some of the social and economic infrastructure that supports people in work. The most important of these are education (particularly further and adult provision, but also the quality of the schools attended by the young people living in the area), public transport and childcare. With regard to transport, an issue commonly raised is the pattern of bus routes, which increasingly operate on a hub and spoke pattern, which means that even where transport is available, people have to change buses in the town centre in order to get to work (DCLG 2006; Griggs et al 2008; Atkinson and Williams 2003; Sanderson 2006; Green and White 2007).
More recent research into the geographical pattern of worklessness has reinforced the conclusions that areas differ. Each area has different economic and social circumstances. Successful projects are both developed and delivered at a local level. What works in one area might not work in another with different labour market circumstances and different population characteristics. The overriding need is for projects to be firmly rooted in the circumstances of their localities. Local data, knowledge and experience are important in meeting local needs. The evidence suggests that bottom-up approaches rooted in the community encourage commitment and generate clearer understanding of the needs of potential programme participants and local employers. Multi-agency partnership working appears to be more effective where it is based on established relationships, which are more likely to be found at a local level (Sanderson 2006; Campbell et al 1998; DTLGR 2001; DCLG
Ritchie et al 2005; North et al 2007; Taylor et al 2007).
4
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland the devolved administrations have central roles to play (Campbell et al 1998; Fletcher et al 1998; Green and Owen 2006;
Russell 1998; Simons 1998; Taner et al 1997; DCLG
More generally, the evidence does not suggest that the record of different types of organisation (whether voluntary, statutory, or private, national or local) differs markedly. What does matter is an understanding of both client needs and employer needs.
The move towards more localised approaches needs to take account of the fact that areas differ in their capacity to deliver effective interventions, in terms of the skills of those directly involved in delivery, in terms of the experience and capacity within local communities to take part in the range of activities involved in partnership working, and in the relationships between collaborating organisations and with local employers (Taylor et al 2007; Campbell et
McGregor et al 1997; Robinson et al 1998; Russell 1998; Sanderson et al 1999; Simons 1998; McGregor et al 2003; Regional Co-ordination Unit 2002; Audit
Green 2007).
Research has suggested that successful delivery of interventions to help workless people involves:
and good communication skills;
to reach;
cause confusion among clients;
different agencies;
to provide them with services and support.
In addition to personal adviser skills, management skills (and increasingly partnership skills) are vital to the effective delivery of labour market interventions (Campbell et al 1998; Fletcher et al 1998; Priority Estates Project 1997; Russell 1998; DTLGR 2001; Sutton et al 2004; Taylor et al 2007; North et al 2007).
It is also important to recognise that effective community engagement may require the development and enhancement of the capacity of the community and local organisations to take part in partnership working and provide effective representation (Taylor et al 2007; DCLG 2008; Judge et al 1999).
The earlier review (Meadows and Campbell 2001) found that people living in deprived communities often feel that too many initiatives are being directed to them, for them or at them. Many communities had been subject to a number of initiatives since the launch of the Urban Programme in the late 1960s. This issue remains live. The Department for Communities and Local Government, reflecting in 2008 on the lessons to be learned from the New Deal for Communities (NDC), recognised that:
“These areas have been subject to a range of previous government interventions; there can be little doubt that there is a widespread perception that such initiatives have generally proved of limited value; whether justified or not, there is a strong sense of resentment towards the ‘council’ based on its apparent failure to deliver services or to reverse the engines of decline; ... and there is an almost universal view that most previous regeneration initiatives within NDC areas have failed”.(DCLG 2008: p6)
Evaluation studies consistently show that a sense of ownership and influence by the local community is consistently associated with more successful projects. A positive sense of ownership is likely to encourage more people to take part in the project and to generate greater enthusiasm and commitment among participants. The importance of word of mouth as a recruitment method means that the reputation of a project can make or break it, and that reputation is likely to be affected by the relationship between the project and the local community (Meadows and Campbell 2001; North et al 2007).
Delivery capacity and institutions
A key driver of the move towards more localised service delivery is the recognition that the needs of individuals served by national programmes vary. The drive towards greater localisation of programme delivery is in part based on a desire to move delivery decisions closer to the individual, based on the evidence that provision which is more closely tailored
Activities that aim to help workless people find and keep paid work come in a variety of forms, with a number of possible sponsors, with different roles and interests. In a typical area, the local authority, Jobcentre Plus, the Regional Development Agency, Business Link, further education colleges, voluntary and private sector providers of employment and training support, and housing associations may have an interest at either a local strategy level or in respect of particular policies or programmes. In
5
Some examples of good practice in partnership working
North et al’s review of case studies of partnership working found:
“Brent in 2 Work has also deliberately encouraged an open and co-operativeculture between partners. With regard to major agencies, there are strong working relationships with the principal partners – London Borough of Brent, Jobcentre Plus, College of North West London and the London Development Agency – that have developed over time and generated a degree of trust. Importantly, these organisations were involved in the original strategy formulation, which has ensured a degree of genuine partnership commitment.
CPR Works provides an example of the way an organisation can add value to and complement the work of an existing partnership, in this case the Local Strategic Partnership, West Cornwall Together (WCT). WCT sees CPR Works as offering an extra level of focus and support in the most deprived neighbourhoods, providing a more in-depth and flexible approach to engaging with individual workless people than that of mainstream agencies. Joint working between WCT and CPR Works has also been made easier by the co-location of the two organisations in the same building.”
Source: North et al (2007) p87
The Audit Commission’s review of inspection evidence related to economic regeneration activities
“Inspectors assessed the service as excellent. Users are very satisfied with the service they receive – unemployment levels have reduced and investment in the area has increased. Inspectors concluded that the service has many positive features, including:
which businesses appreciate; and
employers.”
In the case of Amber Valley the Commission concluded:
“Inspectors felt that the services provided were good for the following reasons:
organisations in the District. There has been a real shift from Council service-led strategies to community-based strategies.
businesses.
... Amber Valley District Council’s approach to economic regeneration is inclusive and imaginative in the way that it involves communities and users. Again, key to successful economic regeneration, Amber Valley District Council has demonstrated strong partnership skills.”
Source: Audit Commission (2003)
6
Nevertheless, particularly where initiatives to tackle worklessness have disadvantaged groups as a key part of their potential clientele, successful projects are likely to ensure that their partnership arrangements include organisations or individuals that are both well established in and well respected by local communities. Such organisations will vary from area to area. They may include tenants’ associations, parent-teacher organisations and faith groups, as well as those whose interests more directly relate to the world of work, particularly local employers. In areas of diversity it is important to ensure that all parts of the community are represented, and are encouraged to work together (Taylor et al 2007; Meadows 2006).
involved in tackling worklessness, and they can be valuable partners as they already have relationships with potential clients and can provide premises for
It is important that issues of conflicting accountability are resolved and that management structures for joint working are clear. Furthermore, it is not uncommon for there to be multiple partnerships operating within an area, and this can pose resource difficulties for employers, for members of the community and for
2007b; North et al 2007). McDonald (2003) found that
each had over 300 partnerships working in their areas.
More generally, there is a limited supply of the skills and resources required to bring together successful partnerships and this needs to be recognised. It is therefore important that all members of partnerships, including people from voluntary and community organisations, have access to training in partnership skills (Taylor et al 2007; McDonald 2003). The Employers’ Organisation for Local Government has identified these skills under four headings:
partnerships;
partnerships;
learning and improvement in partnerships;
for managing effective partnerships.(Local Government National Training Organisation (n.d.))
Partnership issues
Few organisations can themselves provide individualised solutions to the wide range of problems workless people have, but by working effectively in partnership with other organisations they can ensure that individual needs are met. Many workless people face multiple barriers to work, including housing problems, poor health, issues related to alcohol or drugs or a history of offending. People from minority ethnic groups may face discrimination and some people will have limited English. Parents have childcare needs. No one organisation can provide solutions to all of these issues, so effective partnership working is essential (Sanderson 2006; Marshall and Macfarlane 2000; Randall and Brown 1999; Lakey et al 2001;
2007).
A review of a wide range of evidence related to partnership working, commissioned by the Treasury as part of its strategy to improve productivity in the public sector, concluded that the key features of a successful partnership are:
both leadership and innovation skills;
resource costs on participating organisations and individuals. Building relationships and mutual knowledge bases takes time if it is to be done effectively. Taken with the number of formal and informal meetings, there may be disproportionate burdens on small voluntary and community organisations (McGregor et al 2003; Taylor et al 2007). Moreover, partnerships have to change their focus from strategy to delivery, members move on and relationships need to be built anew. This can be something of a “treadmill” (DCLG 2008).
7
Engaging communitiesThe evidence suggests that working with and through trusted and credible organisations based in the community is one of the more effective ways of promoting employment and enterprise within deprived areas (DCLG 2006).
involved. A recent review of New Deal for Communities projects has identified problems with:
and local authorities, and also amongst different communities or constituencies;
by racial tensions;
resources. (DCLG 2008).
These issues are also relevant to the discussions of delivery capacity and institutions and partnership discussed above.
The review recognised that there is a case for arguing that whatever the challenges of community engagement, the alternative approach, not engaging the community, may be worse.
Outreach with individualsDisadvantaged areas often contain concentrations of people with poor information networks, low self-esteem and negative attitudes towards paid work (Meadows and Campbell 2001; Sanderson 2006; DCLG 2008). Outreach work is an important way of overcoming some of the reluctance to engage with organisations and interventions that might be able to help. It can also help to ensure that the most disadvantaged groups in the population are able to take advantage of the support available. This both advances social equity and helps to minimise deadweight, which occurs when projects and programmes help those who would have been able to help themselves (Sanderson 2006). The evidence suggests that outreach working collaboratively with mainstream provision has the best chance of success (DGLG 2006).
Engagement and outreach
There are two dimensions to engagement and outreach, although they are inter-related. The first relates to engagement with the local community, local organisations and local employers and the second relates to engagement with individual potential programme clients. The first requires an element of neighbourhood delivery and ownership and is often regarded as a prerequisite for the second, but engagement with organisations in a disadvantaged area is not necessarily sufficient to ensure the active engagement of individuals. Social networks play an important part in influencing attitudes towards jobs and training. Understanding that these differ between areas can contribute to the effectiveness of policies and programmes at a local level (Sanderson 2006; Green and White 2007; North et al 2007).
There are also tensions around the most appropriate level for interventions to take place. Although neighbourhood level might maximise community engagement, the involvement of employers and Jobcentre Plus might be more likely if an initiative covers a local authority area, or even part of a region (as the City Partnerships do). The risk to disadvantaged neighbourhoods is that their voices will not be heard within a broader area, where people from neighbourhoods with stronger social capital will be more readily available to represent the wider community. Black and minority ethnic communities may find themselves particularly marginalised in gaining access to decision-making structures. There are also issues around economies of scale: smaller-scale, more localised interventions tend to be more expensive because they are less able to share their overhead costs. Local authorities can, in principle, minimise overheads by including employment and training initiatives as part of their regeneration activities, yet for many authorities this is not a key area of activity (Taylor et al 2007; North et al 2007; Meadows 2006; Campbell and Meadows 2001). It is helpful if these tensions can be recognised and considered explicitly when local interventions are being developed.
8
and Greenberg 2005; Sutton et al 2004; Marshall and
2006; O’Connor et al 2001; Meadows 2006).
Recent migrants may face language and cultural barriers and lack understanding as to how employers recruit, even though they may be well qualified. They may also have qualifications which are not recognised
Black and minority ethnic communities may also find it difficult to access the social networks which are an important part of finding jobs, and this may be due in part to residential segregation. There may be high levels of trust in networks within the community, but less trust in external networks (Taner et al 1997; Barnes et al 2005; Sanderson 2006; Tackey et al 2006; Dewson et al 2006). Some community members may have language difficulties, but many also face employer discrimination. It is also important to recognise that minority communities are becoming increasingly diverse in their experience in the labour market, both in terms of their qualifications and experience, and in terms of employer attitudes towards them. While being a member of a minority ethnic community may make labour market disadvantage more likely, it is not an automatic
Atkinson et al 2006).
An essential part of successfully tailoring support to individual needs is an initial assessment which establishes what skills, capabilities and experience someone has as well as the gaps that need to
assessment allows advisers to ensure that the kind of work or training provided helps to build on and develop existing capabilities. This has been shown in specialist projects for projects for groups such as ex-offenders and disabled people, as well as in large-scale mainstream provision such as the New Deal for Young People (Barnes et al 1998; Fletcher et al 1998; Russell 1998; O’Connor et al 2001).
The consensus of a wide range of evidence reviewed by Meadows (2006) and Greenberg et al (2005) is that for those who are close to the labour market – who have personal or work-related skills and only minor problems – the most effective form of support is help with job finding, presentation and interview skills. Advice about the availability of financial support in paid work also has a key role to play. Work experience placements (essentially a form of extended interview)
further away from the labour market, particularly those whose personal and work-related skills are such that they would find it difficult to hold down a job if placed
People who can be helped by outreach rather than mainstream provision are:
mainstream provision, particularly Jobcentre Plus;
provision because of disability, cost, transport difficulties or childcare;
who may be unfamiliar with employers’ recruitment practices and the services that are available;
find it difficult to engage with official bodies and prefer to trust members of their own community;
that do not take place in a local (particularly familiar) environment where they feel comfortable;
record) which may put them at a disadvantage in dealing with mainstream providers.
(Dewson et al 2006; Campbell 2000; Sanderson 2006; McGivney 2000; Champney et al 2005; Taylor and O’Connor 2005; Griggs et al 2008; Lakey et al 2001; Griffiths et al 2006; North et al 2007; Meadows 2006;
al 2006).
Successful outreach can also generate a snowball effect, with newly engaged clients generating word-of-
Given the nature of the clientele for outreach work, it is important that the premises used are local, “non-official” and comfortable (Dewson et al 2006; Sanderson 2006; McGivney 2000). Libraries, schools, football clubs and pubs have all been successfully used for outreach to engage people reluctant to engage in learning and skills activities (Champney et al 2005).
Meeting individual needs
There is no single intervention that is likely to be suitable for all workless people. Their individual backgrounds and needs vary. Interventions are more effective if they take into account the starting point of the individual. This requires personalised assessments prior to the start of an intervention, and an appropriately tailored package of help thereafter.
Workless people range from the well qualified with recent work experience to those with poor basic skills, physical or mental health problems, substance usage, homelessness, childcare needs and a history of offending. The most effective interventions are those which address the needs of the individual in an integrated way. Sometimes this will take place within a single organisation, but it can also involve referrals
9
adviser discretion over how they spend the resources available to them. What works well with one client group may not work at all for another, and this is recognised in that there is no standardised package of support.
a clear incentive to ensure that the job fits the client, as additional funding is available for jobs that are retained for a longer period. These are all likely to contribute to the positive perceptions of clients, which in turn are also likely to improve
Griggs et al 2008).
Many European Social Fund projects are holistic schemes, which aim to help people with a range of problems, such as housing and health problems as well as worklessness. There is some limited evidence in this study that projects which focus on specific core client groups or geographic areas do appear to perform better in engaging, and then helping, their
dealing with disadvantaged young people (Pitcher 2002) or young homeless people (Randall and Brown 1999) support the view that helping young people to develop a work-focused lifestyle, as well as actually finding a job, can help them to tackle some of their other problems.
Specialist projects dealing with particular groups also need to recognise that even though participants have been selected because they are, say, ex-offenders, they may have other disadvantages. For instance, literacy problems are common among offenders. But they may have problems, which may be unrelated to their offending, for example accommodation or health problems, or they may be a member of a minority ethnic group (Meadows 2006; DCLG 2006).
Intermediate labour markets (ILMs) are social enterprise organisations producing socially useful goods and services employing disadvantaged groups facing multiple barriers to work. Their main focus is on getting experience in a real work environment and developing work habits, although they also provide support with job search and some basic training. There is a strong emphasis on helping participants deal with all their problems, not just that are directly relevant to their working lives, and there is a high staff-client ratio. Their outcomes (especially subsequent job retention and earnings) and cost-effectiveness compare favourably with other initiatives for the same target groups, although their costs per client are relatively high compared with provision for some other target groups. The evidence suggests that it is important to focus on the need to prepare to move into the wider labour market and to maintain links
immediately into work, an initial period of training is
expensive compared with job placement help and work experience, and it also postpones the point at which an individual takes up employment. Given that employer-based training generally leads to better outcomes than classroom-based training, the key message for projects is to ensure that participants are equipped to take advantage of on-the-job training with employers. Even if they lack qualifications initially, acquiring qualifications in work generates better returns than acquiring them through college provision.
The evidence suggests that even the most disadvantaged can be helped into work if support is sufficiently tailored to their needs and circumstances. Reviewing a range of research on local schemes involving job brokerage schemes, adult learning and young people with multiple disadvantages, the Department for Communities and Local Government concluded that there were clear advantages in providing holistic, client-centred support including both outreach and inter-agency collaboration (DCLG 2006). Evidence from Action Teams for Jobs (Ecotec 2002);
and O’Connor 2005), Employment Zones (Griffiths et
projects for substance users (Sutton et al 2004) have all highlighted the importance of flexibility in responding to the needs of clients and delivering an individually-focused service.
Holistic provision
of needs, and that their worklessness may be closely related to their money difficulties, childcare needs, housing problems or drug use. Often addressing their lack of work helps them to tackle these other issues, but also support such as drug counselling or help in finding accommodation can give people the stability they need to sustain the disciplines needed to maintain employment. This provision can be integrated – that is provided within a single organisation – or involve inter-agency collaboration (Sutton et al 2004; Fletcher et al 1998; Robinson et al 1998; Sanderson et al 1999; Simons 1998).
Employment Zones have been more intensively studied than many of the other more individualised interventions. The three key elements they offer clients are:
supportive personal advisers whose only task is to help in finding work. Unlike Jobcentre Plus advisers they do not have other roles or tasks. They have more time to spend getting to know the client and assessing their needs and capabilities. They are not bound by a timetable of regularly scheduled meetings but can vary the number and timing of meetings with clients.
10
Long-term illness and disability The relationship between labour market disadvantage and long-term illness and disability is complex. Those who are disabled as children or young people frequently have lower educational attainments than otherwise similar non-disabled young people (Ritchie et al 2005). Those who become disabled as adults face limits on their ability to do some types of work, which reduces their job prospects. But there is also a group of people who might have some health problems, but as long as they are in paid work, they have no need or desire to classify themselves as disabled. When they are no longer working, particularly if their job loss was involuntary, this health condition does become a barrier to at least some types of work, and therefore the health problem, either physical or mental, becomes
Green 2007). Finally there is a subset of this group who have responded to the incentive structure the benefit system has confronted them with, at least in the past. For those whose job prospects are poor, a move from Jobseeker’s Allowance to Incapacity Benefit has both given a higher level of income and provided a means of avoiding the obligation to look for work or take part in related activities. It has provided a valid reason for being workless. This can lead to a geographical concentration of economically inactive people of working age, so that some projects will find that a large proportion of their clients are Incapacity Benefit claimants (Ritchie et al 2005; DCLG 2006; Sanderson 2006).
Berthoud (2006) estimated that the employment penalty associated with disability (after adjusting for qualifications and other demographic characteristics) is around 40 per cent. This outcome reflects the combination of genuine inability to do some jobs, employer discrimination and individual motivation. Interventions to help disabled people need to recognise all three issues.
The impact of mainstream interventions on participants with health problems or impairments has not generally
what works for participants as a whole appears to work equally well for disabled people, with the exception of young people with mental health problems, for whom generating improved employment
Green 2007). One explanation for the difficulty might be that these young people have other disadvantages as well (for example poor educational experiences) and it is these other disadvantages that are driving their labour market difficulties.
on intensive personalised support appears to be helpful for the most disadvantaged groups (Marshall and Macfarlane 2000; DCLG 2006). It is important to guard against the risk that provision which is essentially direct job creation, and which does not have the intensive personal support available in “true” ILMs, might be presented as being intermediate labour market provision in order to secure funding for an organisation’s own objectives. Funders need to scrutinise ILM projects carefully to ensure that they include the full range of services (Meadows 2006).
Measuring outcomesThere is a certain amount of ambiguity over what constitutes good practice. Often it is defined in terms of performance in placing clients into work. It would be more appropriate to define good practice as what works for a client with a specific set of disadvantages. Good project performance arises when the package of support addresses the range of needs of all clients and moves them towards paid employment. The advantage of employment as an outcome is that it is easy to measure, and is determined independently
the needs of the most disadvantaged groups rather than concentrate on those who are closest to the labour market, it is important that funding regimes are not simply based on job outcomes. Otherwise, there is a risk that the focus of the project and the delivery mechanisms will be directed at those easiest to help, and will neglect those with more challenging needs. Conversely, there is a risk that projects that are working effectively to address the needs of the most disadvantaged will appear to perform poorly on job outcomes and may receive less funding (Lewis et al
A number of studies have produced suggestions for intermediate indicators of distance travelled (for
Lloyd and O’Sullivan (2003), rather than putting forward a list of specific indicators, suggested a set of principles on which funders and project managers should base their indicators. These were:
behaviour;
produced in similar situations;
information to get an even balance of indicators;
on existing assessments and information and contributing to existing plans;
11
This evidence of limited success makes the results emerging from the Pathways to Work programme for people on incapacity benefit all the more impressive. The programme comprises:
return to work;
programmes developed jointly with local National
The initial evaluation suggests that the package has increased flows out of incapacity benefit by around 8 per cent (Blyth 2006). The programme has been extended nationally since spring 2008.
The qualitative evaluation suggested that long-term sick and disabled people returning to work need a variety of additional support in the workplace. This includes help in coping socially at work, adaptations to the workplace, and help negotiating with employers. The availability of this kind of in-work support under the Pathways scheme seems to have smoothed the transition for both new employees and their employers (Dixon and Warrener 2008).
The Access to Work programme helps disabled people with the costs of support workers, travel to work, alterations to workplace premises and aids and equipment. The evaluation evidence suggests that help with travel to work is the part of the package that most helps people obtain and retain jobs when they would not do so otherwise (Thornton and Corden 2002).
The key messages arising from all the evaluations concerning long-term illness and disability are:
perception of themselves and to shift their focus from what they cannot do to what they can.
with travel arrangements can have a marked impact for those with physical disabilities.
expertise in the needs of particular types of client and the requirements of particular employers are more effective for long-term sick and disabled people than generalists are.
need help in adapting to the workplace.
Corden and Thornton (2002), reviewing a range of interventions for disabled people, found only six evaluations that considered both outcomes and process issues. They found that:
or not targeting works, but in any case the provision of support at the point of initial claim for disability-related benefits is not effective, since at this point health conditions are often unstable;
caseworkers are critical to success but often fragile;
disabled workers into the workplace and equipping them with skills for advancement, but this is not widely available;
types of service are most effective.
More recent evaluations confirm these general conclusions. The New Deal for Disabled People (NDDP) evaluation has found relatively high placement rates into employment (over 50 per cent), but participants are only a small percentage of the eligible population (3 per cent, rising to 5 per cent in Pathways to Work pilot areas) and they have personal characteristics which make them more likely to be employed than the typical Incapacity Benefit claimant. Twelve months after starting the programme, NDDP clients had employment rates 9 per cent higher than a comparison group. After 24 months, the rates were 11 per cent higher (Stafford et al 2007).
The outcomes were better for those with physical disabilities rather than mental health problems, and for those living in areas with relatively high concentrations of Incapacity Benefit claimants. Those with public or private-sector providers were also more likely to move into employment than those with charitable or other voluntary-sector providers. This may reflect the fact that previously the only specialist providers were drawn from the voluntary sector, whereas now there is increasing expertise within the statutory and private sectors in dealing with clients with long-term illness and disability. There is evidence that over time, as providers have become more expert, the services delivered to clients have become more personalised (Stafford et al 2007).
The Job Retention and Rehabilitation Pilot offered support to people who had been ill for between six and 22 weeks because of either workplace problems, health problems (for example physiotherapy or
were almost identical for the three intervention groups and the control group (Purdon et al 2006).
12
Nevertheless, even where people will be better off in paid work there are practical challenges to be overcome, not least the administrative delays in reassessments and processing payments. It is the risk of being stranded with debts and no cash which often deters people as much as their lack of understanding of the system (Sanderson 2006). Some of the interventions discussed below around financial support to aid retention have a role to play in helping to reduce the risks.
Retention and progression
The Department for Work and Pensions now has job retention and progression at the heart of its policies (DWP 2007). The Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills reiterated its importance in the Government’s response to the Leitch Review of Skills (DIUS 2007). This reflects concerns about the extent to which workless individuals return to claiming out-of-work benefits within a relatively short space of time. More than half the long-term unemployed people who leave Jobseeker’s Allowance for work return within 13 weeks – most quit voluntarily, as opposed to being dismissed or coming to the end of temporary jobs. Most returners say that the job did not suit them (Kellard et al 2002).
People who have come into paid work through a labour market intervention (or a long period on state benefits) often bring with them a range of problems which affect their ability to keep their jobs. Studies in both the US and Britain have found that people subsequently leave their jobs because of problems both inside and outside the workplace. These include childcare or transport difficulties, substance abuse, physical or mental health problems or a history of incarceration. Work-related problems include temporary jobs, unrealistic expectations of what the job involves, disagreements over hours of work and shift patterns, and problems in relationships with colleagues and supervisors (Stafford et al 2007; Lewis et al 2005; Dixon and Warrener 2008; Johnson 2002; Walker and Kellard 2001).
Making work payPeople’s motivation to look for and find paid work (and to stay in their jobs once they have started work) is influenced by the extent to which they think they will be better off working than not working. This in turn is influenced by the incomes that are available to them when they are out of work and those which are available in work. The latter is a mixture of earnings, non-income-related benefits such as child benefit, and income-related benefits such as tax credits and housing benefit.
In addition, many people taking jobs are confronted with immediate cash flow problems which can be difficult to manage when budgeting from week to week. Wages may be paid monthly, but if paid more frequently might be paid a week or more in arrears.
process. In the meantime, working clothes and equipment and travel to work costs have to be paid for up front. Easing these problems makes taking a job less risky, and staying in it a more attractive proposition (Bivand et al 2003).
The evidence suggests that workless people are not well informed about the availability of working tax credit, childcare tax credit, housing benefit and other forms of in-work support. Even where they have some knowledge, the calculations of the net income available at particular wage rates are complex and depend on family circumstances. The three key factors are the number of children (which influences both benefit levels out of work and potential childcare costs when in work), the level of rent (which influences the level of housing benefit, and is in turn a function of both location and family size) and potential earnings. While Jobcentre Plus advisers have access to software that enables them to make calculations on behalf of workless people, other advisers and job brokers may not. Some are unfamiliar with the details, and are reluctant to provide financial advice
Green 2007; Stafford et al 2007; Dixon et al 2008; Sanderson 2006). Better information and more routine provision of illustrative income calculations by advisers has an immediate role to play in dispelling some misconceptions. The very complexity of the system means that the role it can play in encouraging workless people to move into paid work is limited.
13
The kinds of services that support job placements are useful in job retention and advancement (and could in principle be provided by the same organisations). These include training in soft skills and job search techniques and help in developing a work-focused
and Kellard 2001; Dixon and Warrener 2008). Such support is particularly important for people who have little or no recent experience of paid work. Some Employment Zones that were concerned about how many people who were placed into work returned to unemployment within 13 weeks have restructured their services to provide greater in-work support (Griffiths et al 2006). The payment structure has also been changed so that a higher proportion of the payment to providers is triggered by job retention rather than initial placement (Griffiths and Durkin 2007).
overcoming the reluctance on the part of people who have moved into work to engage with the help that is available to them. Often they do not see it as relevant to their needs in their new situation, and may regard it as a threat to their new-found sense of independence, even when they are struggling (Dixon and Warrener
This reinforces the need for staff to be well trained, both in understanding labour market needs and in providing personal support.
Often people moving from benefits to work are unaware of the kind of help and support they can get in terms of childcare or in-work income support. Providing ready access to advice on these issues and help in claiming may increase retention. For those with more complex needs, case managers need to have access to range of more specialist support services, for example to deal with health, housing or substance misuse issues (Walker and Kellard 2001; Dixon and Warrener 2008).
Sometimes an employer will find it difficult to cope with a disadvantaged new employee, but rather than dismiss the employee, would prefer to have access to
other people discussing them with their employer, so it is not clear that engagement of advisers with employers is necessarily helpful (Dixon and Warrener 2008).
Specific interventions targeted at retention and advancementUntil recently, relatively few interventions have had retention and advancement (as opposed to placement into employment) as their objective.
The Employment Retention and Advancement Demonstration (ERAD) is under way in six Jobcentre Plus districts. The programme offers ongoing support for up to two years from a personal adviser once the client has entered work. Clients may also receive a retention bonus if they remain in work beyond 13 weeks, and they have access to financial help to cover emergencies which might threaten job retention and for training. The evaluation found that lone parents receiving ERAD support earned considerably more than control group parents, mainly because they were much more likely to be working full-time rather than part-time. Although there was no difference in the overall employment rate of the two groups at the 12-month point, lone parents who had received ERAD support had spent a higher proportion of the year in paid work. The impact on the other two client groups (New Deal 25+ clients and employed lone parents receiving Working Tax Credits) was small (Dorsett et al 2007).
The In-Work Support element of Pathways to Work offers support to former Incapacity Benefit claimants returning to work. Funding arrangements differ between areas, and not all offer retention payments. In some cases the funding helps clients over the transition into work only (Dixon and Warrener 2008). It is therefore difficult to draw general conclusions about the impact on retention and progression.
StepUP was a form of work experience placement available to people who became eligible for New Deal 25+ for a second or subsequent time. Support during the placement included a support worker and a workplace mentor. The evaluation of StepUP concluded that the role of the independent support worker was critical in maximising retention within StepUP jobs (Bivand et al 2006).
14
Factors known to influence retention and advancementStart with the right jobIf someone is placed in a job which is unsuited to their capabilities and personal circumstances they will not remain in it. Either the employer will be dissatisfied with their performance, or the employee will feel unable to continue. Either way, entry into the wrong job risks putting someone in a revolving door between worklessness
Employees are more likely to make the effort to keep a job if:
In Britain, providers of Employment Zones services receive large bonuses if participants retain a job for at least
pilots (Atkinson et al 2007). These payments are intended to encourage job brokers to find the most suitable job for a client.
Financial incentivesDorsett et al (2007) attribute the impact of the Employment Retention and Advancement Demonstration project
when clients were in full-time employment. Clients had a high level of awareness about the availability of the bonus.
The Employment Zones evaluation in Britain also stressed the importance of financial support once in work as a means of aiding job retention, both in terms of generally available support, such as the Working Tax Credit, and in terms of providing direct incentives, such as providing driving lessons or even cash payments for those who stay in their jobs for 13 weeks or more (Griffiths and Durkin 2007; Griffiths et al 2006).
The pilot In-Work Emergency Fund operated by Jobcentre Plus addresses the issue of the need for a financial cushion for emergencies, and qualitative evaluation suggests it has been useful in a small number of cases,
supposed to promote its availability. They could only offer help from the fund to those who faced a financial bridging problem which risked them returning to Income Support. It was also only supposed to be available for one-off, individual financial emergencies, and not for relatively common problems, such as a delay in receiving tax credit payments or the need to pay for initial travel to work costs (Thomas and Jones 2006).
Generally available measures to improve incomes while in paid employment (such as the Working Tax Credit) have the effect of improving job retention, even though they are generally regarded as anti-poverty measures
likely to be ineffective unless people are aware of their availability and understand what impact a successful claim is likely to have on their income.
Reliable and affordable childcareChildcare problems (availability, flexibility and cost) are one of the most important reasons why parents (more particularly mothers, whether or not they live with a partner) leave their jobs. The evidence suggests that informal
less (and is often free). Thus, parents have a strong incentive to use informal arrangements if they are available to them. Moreover, parents tend to place a high level of trust in informal arrangements (Dixon and Warrener 2008; Knight and Thomas 2006; Johnston 2002; Bell et al 2005; Walker and Kellard 2001).
15
The evidence consistently suggests that interventions with employer-placements and work-based training are more successful in leading to employment. These interventions put participants in contact with employers and help develop more general employability skills, as well as enabling the individuals concerned to demonstrate work experience to potential employers. The outcomes from classroom-based training programmes are better if they include an element of work experience and are focused on the needs of the local labour market (Dench et al 2007;
Many small and medium-sized organisations find recruitment expensive, and projects can exploit this by offering a job matching service and by ensuring that follow-up support is available to employers who run into difficulties. One possible approach is to offer employers the possibility of free or low-cost trials
et al 2005).
The Fair Cities pilots evaluation found that the key attractions to engagement by employers are:
recruitment solution;
users;
(Atkinson et al 2007).
Engagement with employers
The closer measures are to the open labour market the more likely they are to be successful. It is not enough to concentrate on the needs of individuals. Unless projects address local labour market circumstances, they will not successfully secure employment for programme participants.
Engaging employers is not necessarily straightforward, and they are likely to be resistant to anything that is time consuming and does not have clear outcomes. Essentially, bringing employers in is a form of outreach work: it is intensive and requires high levels of inter-personal skills as well as a good organisation to back it up. They must be involved as early as possible, and the process must be simple and streamlined. It can be useful to make use of existing employer networks and build on existing corporate responsibility activity. The key lesson is that it is better to have strong links with a few genuinely committed employers than weak links with many.
Unless work with clients focuses on the kind of jobs that are likely to be available locally, resources are likely to be wasted and outcomes are likely to be poor. Good relationships with employers not only help with immediate placement into jobs, but also with post-employment support and the potential to influence recruitment practices in the longer term (Sanderson 2006; DCLG 2006; McGregor et al 1997; Sanderson et al 1999). The development of these relationships may require cold calling as well as contacts with
Opportunities to develop skills while workingOpportunities to take part in employer-supported training and to engage in independent study are an important
and responsible for families have limited time to undertake developmental training beyond that provided by their employers (Walker and Kellard 2001).
Mentoring and peer supportDifficulties in relationships with colleagues are one of the most common sources of job breakdown (Lewis et al 2005). Workplace mentors can help new employees develop a sense of belonging to their employing organisation, and the mentor can help them to negotiate problems in the workplace, including relationships with colleagues and supervisors. Peer support groups can provide social support and reinforce the transition in
may not be appropriate. Often people are reluctant to be referred to a mentor, and those who are referred may
TravelDifficulties in travelling to work can make a job difficult to sustain, particularly for disabled people and those with health problems. Conversely, help with travel is something that can aid retention (Stafford et al 2007). More generally, travel problems often lead people to give up their jobs, so thought needs to be given to ensuring that jobs entail travel patterns that are sustainable (Stafford et al 2007; Lewis et al 2005; Dixon and Warrener 2008; Johnson 2002; Walker and Kellard 2001).
16
Conclusion
The main conclusion to be drawn from the evidence is the need to build on local knowledge and relationships. The most successful interventions know their clients, know their local employers, and have good relationships with other relevant agencies who can meet the needs they are unable to address directly. Most positive outcomes flow from following these principles.
Not every area will have this knowledge and these relationships in place, and it may be necessary to put resources into developing them. Although this may delay service delivery, without the knowledge base the services will not be very effective. In some areas, trust will be difficult to develop, especially where communities have previously received other interventions.
About the project
This study was commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation with the aim of informing and influencing practice within the Government’s new Working Neighbourhoods Fund (WNF). Pamela Meadows summarises and updates work carried out earlier for JRF in its Work and Opportunities programme that drew to a close in 2001. That programme pulled together the results of some 25 research projects which, over the previous four years or so, had researched local solutions to the problems of worklessness. JRF believes that many of these messages are still very relevant to the current WNF programme.
Projects working with specific disadvantaged client groups have found that they can do more for their clients if they can also provide a service for employers in terms of helping them to find staff. This has been found to be true for substance users (Sutton et al
2005; Simons 1998).
Employment Zones have built effective relationships with employers. EZ providers are more attuned to the concerns of employers than Jobcentre Plus is. Many have established specialist employer liaison staff whose job is to build relationships with employers, learn about their recruitment needs and get an inside track on forthcoming vacancies. Such methods enabled providers to source additional job vacancies and to match customers to jobs not otherwise available to them (perhaps because the employer concerned did not normally recruit people from disadvantaged groups), nor generally accessible via Jobcentre Plus. Further vacancies were often identified using advisers’ personal contacts and informal networks of friends and former colleagues. Those working with clients try and prepare them for specific local vacancies. This can take the form of approaching an employer about a particular client or running short work-preparation courses to train clients for entry-level jobs in local areas lacking specific skills (Griffiths et al 2006; Griffiths and Durkin 2007). In this way they help both clients and local employers.
17
Campbell, M. and Meadows, P. (2001) What Works Locally? York: York Publishing Services.
Campbell M., Sanderson I. and Walton F. (1998) LocalResponses to Long-term Unemployment. York: York Publishing Services.
Champney, J., Davey, M. and Lawrence, S. (2005) BreakingDown the Barriers: Success in Widening Participation, A Toolkit Approach, NIACE and Learning and Skills
login.aspx?code=052023&P=052023PD&action=pdfdl&src=xoweb.
Corden, A. and Thornton, P. (2002) EmploymentProgrammes for Disabled People: Lessons from research evaluations, Department for Work and Pensions In-house
review. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 375. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Department for Communities and Local Government (2008) Challenges, Interventions and Change: An overview of Neighbourhood Renewal in Six New Deal for Communities areas
.
Department for Communities and Local Government (2007a) The Working Neighbourhoods Fund.
Department for Communities and Local Government (2007b) What works in economic development for deprived neighbourhoods?displaypagedoc.asp?id=1914.
Department for Communities and Local Government (2006a) The Economies of Deprived Neighbourhoods: summary of research. 06 NRU 03863
.
Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills (2007) World Class Skills: Implementing the Leitch Review of Skills in England,
Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (2001) New Deal for Communities; National Evaluation Scoping Phase; Worklessness Review. www.
Department for Work and Pensions (2007) Ready for work: full employment in our generation. Cm 7290. London: The
.
Department for Work and Pensions (2006a) A new deal for welfare: Empowering people to work, cm 6730, London: The
Document.pdf).
Dewson, S., Davis, S. and Casebourne, J. (2006) Maximisingthe role of outreach in client engagement. Departmentfor Work and Pensions Research Report No 326. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
References
Reyes de Beaman S., Shaw A. and Stafford B. (2004) NewDeal for Disabled People National Extension: First Wave of the First Cohort of the Survey of Registrants, DWP Research
Atkinson, J., Dewson, S., Casebourne, J. and Tackey, N.D. (2007) Evaluation of the Fair Cities Pilots 2006: Second Interim Report. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 428. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Atkinson, J. and Williams, M. (2003) Employer Perspectives on the Recruitment, Retention and Advancement of Low Pay, Low Status Employees. Brighton: Institute of Employment Studies.
Audit Commission (2003) Economic and Community Regeneration: Learning from Inspection
B948-4d08-AA93-BE4FD186428B&prodType=NATIONAL-REPORT.
R. and Wilkinson, D. (2005) Ethnic Minority Outreach: An evaluation, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 229. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Disabled People and Employment: a review of research and development work. Bristol: Policy Press.
Bell, A., Finch, N., La Valle, I., Sainsbury, R. and Skinner, C. (2005) A question of balance: Lone parents, childcare and work, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 230. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Berthoud, R. (2006) The employment rates of disabled people. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 298. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Bivand, P., Brooke, B., Jenkins, S. and Simmonds, D. (2006) Evaluation of StepUP Pilot: Final Report, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 337. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Bivand, P., Gordon P. and Simmonds, D. (2003) MakingWork Pay in London, London: London Development Agency.
Blundell, R. (2002) Welfare-to-Work: Which Policies Work and Why?. British Academy Keynes Lecture in Economics: 2001, Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blundell, R. and Meghir, C. (2001) Active labour market policy vs employment tax credits: Lessons from recent UK reforms, Swedish Economic Policy Review 8, pp 239-266.
Blyth, B. (2006) Incapacity Benefit reforms – Pathways to Work Pilots performance and analysis, Department for Work and Pensions Working Paper no 26.
Campbell, M. (2000) Reconnecting the Long Term Unemployed to Labour Market Opportunity: The Case for a ‘Local Active Labour Market Policy’, Regional Studies 34 (7).
18
Griggs, J., Whitworth, A., Walker, R., McLennan, D. and Noble, M. (2008) Person or place-based policies to tackle disadvantage? Not knowing what works. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Evaluation of Employment Zones: report on a cohort survey of long-term unemployed people in the Zones and a matched set of comparison areas, DWP Research Report W176.
Challenge Funding, Contracts and Area Regeneration: A decade of innovation in policy management and co-ordination, Bristol: Policy Press.
and Vegeris, S. (2005) The Employment Retention and Advancement scheme – the early months of implementation, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 265. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
What works for whom? A review of evidence and meta-analysis for the Department for Work and Pensions. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 407. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Mentoring and Post-Employment Support, Department for Work and Pensions
Labour’s Welfare Reform: Progress to Date, Foundations no 44. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
McGregor, A., Glass, A., Evans, M. and Simm, C. (2006) Evaluation of multiple provider employment zones Early implementation issues, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 310. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
J. and Marshall, B. (2005) Research into multiple disadvantaged groups in European Social Fund Objective 3 in England, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 286. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Effective Partnership Working
.
Housing Associations: Tackling Worklessness.
Johnson, A. (2002) Job Retention and Advancement in Employment: Review of Research Evidence, Department for
Joyce, L. and Pettigrew, N. (2002) Personal Advisers in New Deal 25+ and Employment Zones, Department for Work and Pensions Working Age Research Report no WAE139.
CapacityBuilding in ESF: Evaluation of Objective 3 Priority 4,DfEE Research Report 124. Nottingham: Department for Education and Employment.
Dewson, S., Eccles, J., Tackey, N.D. and Jackson, A. (2000) Measuring Soft Outcomes and Distance Travelled: A Review of Current Practice, Department for Education and Employment Research Report RR219.
Dixon, J. and Warrener, M. (2008) Pathways to Work: Qualitative study of In-work support. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 478. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Marsh, A., Miller, C., Phillips, J., Ray, K., Riccio, J.A., Rich, S. and Vegeris, S. (2007) Implementation and first year impacts of the UK Employment Retention and Advancement(ERA) demonstration. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 412. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Ecotec (2002) Evaluation of Action Team for Jobs,Department for Work and Pensions Research Report WAE114.
BuildingBridges into Employment and Training for Ex-offenders, York: York Publishing Services.
Forrest, R. and Kearns, A. (1999) Joined Up Places? Social Cohesion and Neighbourhood Regeneration, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Updateto the mid-term evaluation of the UK-GB EQUAL Community Initiative 2000/06. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 311. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Green, A.E. (2005) Local integration of immigrants into the labour market: UK case study – The case of refugees in London. Paris: OECD and London: London Development Agency.
Green, A. and White, R. (2007) Attachment to place: Social networks, mobility and prospects of young people. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Green, A.E. and Owen, D. (2006) The Geography of Poor Skills and Access to Work. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Green, A.E. and Owen D. (1998) Where are the Jobless? Changing unemployment and non-employment in cities and regions. Bristol: Policy Press.
Greenberg, D., Cebulla, A. and Bouchet, S. (2005) Reporton a Meta-Analysis of Welfare-to-Work Programs, University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion
Synthesising the evidence on Employment Zones. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 449. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Evaluation of the Single Provider Employment Zone Extension, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 312. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
19
Purdon, S., Stratford, N., Taylor, R., Natarajan, L., Bell, S. and Whittenberg, D. (2006) Impacts of the Job Retention and Rehabilitation Pilot, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 342, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Priority Estates Project (1997) Resident Services organisations: A new tool for regeneration, PEP.
Randall, G. and Brown, S. (1999) Ending Exclusion: employment and training schemes for homeless young people, York: York Publishing Services.
Regional Co-ordination Unit (2002) Review of Area Based Initiatives. ODPM. abireview.pdf.
Understanding workless people and communities: A literature review. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 255. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Robinson, D., Dunn, K. and Ballintyne, S. (1998) SocialEnterprise Zones: Building innovation into regeneration. York: York Publishing Services.
A Place for the Community? Tyne and Wear Development Corporation’s Approach to regeneration.Bristol: Policy Press.
Sanderson, I. (2006) Worklessness in Deprived Neighbourhoods: A Review of the Evidence, Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, Department for Communities and Local Government.
.
Sanderson, I., Walton, F. and Campbell, M. (1999) Back to Work: Local Action on Unemployment. York: York Publishing Services.
Working their way out of offending: an evaluation of two probation employment schemes,
Simons, K. (1998) Home, Work and Inclusion: the social policy implications of supported living and employment for people with learning disabilities. York: York Publishing Services.
Stafford, B. et al (2007) New Deal for Disabled People: Third synthesis report – key findings from the evaluationDepartment for Work and Pensions Research Report no 430. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Steels, J. and England, J. (2004) Emerging findings for the Refugee Employment Strategy, Department for Work and
Drugand Alcohol Use as Barriers to Employment: A Review of the Literature, Department for Work and Pensions Working Age Research and Analysis Research Report no 193a,
.
Barriers to Employment for Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in Britain, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 360. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Kellard, K. et al. (2002) From Job-Seekers to Job-Keepers: Job Retention, Advancement and the Role of In-Work Support Programmes, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 170. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Knight, G. and Thomas, A. (2006) LPWFI and review meetings administrative data analyses and qualitative evidence: Final report, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 315. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Getting a Chance: Employment support for young people with multiple disadvantages. York: York Publishing Services.
R. and Thornton, P. (2005) New Deal for Disabled People: An in-depth study of Job Broker service delivery, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 246. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Lloyd, R. and O’Sullivan, F. (2003) Measuring Soft Outcomes and Distance Travelled: A Methodology for Developing a Guidance Document, Department for Work and Pensions Working Paper no 8.
Local Government National Training Organisation (n.d.) Developing Skills for Partnership Working
.
Marshall, R. and Macfarlane, R. (2000) The Intermediate Labour Market: A tool for tackling long-term unemployment. York: York Publishing Services.
McDonald, K. (2003) Sustaining Networks. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
McGivney, V. (2000) Working with excluded groups: Guidelines on good practice for providers and policy-makers in working with groups under-represented in adult learning.NIACE: Leicester.
Sutherland V. (2003) Developing people – regenerating place: Achieving greater integration for local area regeneration.Bristol: Policy Press
McGregor, A., Ferguson, F.Z., Fitzpatrick, I., McConnachie, M. and Richmond, K. (1997) Bridging the Jobs Gap: An evaluation of the Wise group and the intermediate labour market, York Publishing Services.
Meadows, P. (2006) What works with tackling worklessness?. London: London Development Agency
.
North, D., Syrett, S., and Etherington, D. (2007) Devolutionand regional governance: Tackling the economic needs of deprived areas. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Experiences of New Deal: Qualitative Profiles of Young Participants, Employment Service Research Report ESR71.
Pitcher, J. (2002) Policies and programmes to address disadvantage among young people: issues for evaluation,Evaluation 8(4): pp.474-495.
Ref: 2246
40 Water End, York YO30 6WP. This project is part of the JRF’s research
authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation. ISSN 0958-3084
Read more Solutions at www.jrf.org.uk
Other formats available.Tel: 01904 615905 email: [email protected]
www.jrf.org.uk
Taner, O., Tiesdell, S. and Moynihan, D. (1997) UrbanRegeneration and Ethnic Minority Groups. Bristol: Policy Press.
Taylor, M., Wilson, M., Purdue, D., and Wilde, P. (2007) Changing Neighbourhoods: lessons from the JRF Neighbourhood Programme. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Taylor, J. and O’Connor, W. (2005) European Social Fund: A profile of ‘inactive’ beneficiaries, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 254. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Thomas, A. and Jones, G. (2006) Work Focused Interviews and lone parent initiatives: further analysis of policies and pilots, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 319. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Thornton, P. and Corden, A. (2002) Evaluating the impact of Access to Work: A Case Study Approach, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report no 138. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
van Reenen, J. (2001) No More Skivvy Schemes? Active Labour Market Policies and the British New Deal for the Young Unemployed in Context, Institute for Fiscal Studies Working
Walker, R. and Greenberg, D. (2005) Determining What Works, in Cebulla A, Ashworth K, Greenberg D and Walker R (2005) Welfare to Work: New Labour and the US Experience. Aldershot: Ashgate.
White, M. and Knight, G. (2002) Benchmarking the Effectiveness of NDYP, PSI Research Discussion Paper
APPENDIX 15
From 3MG website
3MG also offers high quality road access. The site benefits from direct access to the A562 dual carriageway. This provides direct routes to Liverpool, Runcorn, the M56 and the A5300 Knowsley Expressway (which connects with the M62). 3MG is therefore well located to serve the distribution market in the North West of England, lying in to the east of Liverpool and with good quality road links to Warrington, Greater Manchester, Preston and onto Lancaster and Cumbria.
Listed below are distances and average HGV driving times from 3MG to a selected number of destinations in the North West.
• Liverpool: 20km and 30 minutes • Manchester: 45km and 50 minutes • Warrington: 14km and 20 minutes • Preston: 62km and 60 minutes • Chester: 32km and 40 minutes • Wrexham: 62 km and 65 minutes
Most parts of the North West can therefore be reached in under 1 hours driving time.
3MG also benefits from a ‘private’ internal road network, which permits the low cost transfer of goods between warehousing and between warehousing and the intermodal terminal. As the internal road network is not adopted, vehicles operating on cheaper rebated diesel can be used to undertake such transfers.
Longer term, 3MG will benefit from direct access to the new Mersey Gateway bridge. This is a £431million project that would provide a landmark new bridge over the River Mersey between the towns of Runcorn and Widnes. The project includes modifications to the existing Silver Jubilee Bridge that would improve facilities for public transport, walking and cycling across the river. The new Mersey Gateway Bridge will:
� Cross the river around 1.5 kilometres to the east of the Silver Jubilee Bridge � Be a tolled crossing � Have three lanes across the Mersey in each direction � Link the Central Expressway in Runcorn with the Eastern Bypass and Speke Road in Widnes. Three piers in the river will carry the two 300 metre long outer spans that will cross the naturally occurring deeper water channels of the river at either bank. These will be supported by cable stays attached to towers that rise to 135 metres above the river bed. The scheme has recently submitted detailed planning applications.
http://www.3-mg.co.uk/road.aspx
From Halton Council website
The Widnes Waterfront Economic Development Zone programme aims to transform over eighty hectares of low quality industrial land into a new, regionally significant, development site consisting of commercial office and light industrial developments in a dramatic waterfront setting.
A Masterplan, prepared in consultation with key stakeholders and the local business community, sets out the vision and outputs for the area. It is anticipated that the programme will create almost 2,700 new jobs. Commercial developments from the Easter Group, the Forward Partnersip, Priority Sites and Widnes Regeneration Ltd are planned for the area, which will collectively provide over 200,000 sq. ft. of distribution, office and industrial space.
A brand new B&Q retail warehouse is now open, while plans are well advanced for The Hive leisure development (see artist impression below), which includes a six-screen cinema, ice rink, bowling alley, quasar and Frankie and Benny’s restaurant.
Enhancements to the area's infrastructure and environment are also major priorities. Improvements to the Fiddlers Ferry Road/Ashley Way junction are complete and landscaping improvements have taken place on Ashley Way and Earle Road.
Further landscaping and a cycleway are planned for Tanhouse Lane along with the creation of a Linear Park on a section of the disused railway line running through the area.
Key Partners
• Halton Borough Council • Northwest Development Agency (NWDA)
• Government Office North West (GONW) • Halton Strategic Partnership • Widnes Regeneration Ltd (WRL) • Environment Agency.
Start Date:
January 2002
Completion Date:
March 2010
Cost
Public Funding in excess of £12m, drawing in Private Investment in excess of £62m.
Key Facts
So far, completed projects include:
• production and endorsement of the Widnes Waterfront Supplementary Planning Document;
• a programme of site investigations to clarify contamination and inform site remediation;
• the upgrade and adoption of Earle Road; • Widnes Regeneration Limited (WRL), Heron Business Park Phase I –
circa 50,000 sq. ft., of industrial units; • construction of a boardwalk at Widnes Warth; • three new signposted cycle routes into the Waterfront area.
Links
For further information please visit www.widneswaterfront.co.uk
In 2007, Halton Borough Council was runner up in the Best Local Authority Regeneration category, Regeneration and Renewal Magazine Awards. From Widnes waterfront website Progress towards the realisation of the overall objectives of the Widnes Waterfront programme has taken a number of huge strides in the last couple of months. For some time most of the hard work has been taking place behind the
scenes but now the fruits of all that hard work are manifest in perhaps the most visible way, contractors on site and steel coming out of the ground. The new B&Q store and associated speculative industrial units are well advanced, contractors for Priority Sites have begun the construction of 50,000 sq ft of office and hi-tech hybrid accommodation at their site off Earle Road and Langtree Group are about to start work on 30,000 sq ft of managed office space over three floors, again off Earle Road. Perhaps most significantly planning permission has been granted for a leisure complex featuring a five screen cinema, ice rink and associated attractions for the Council owned Venture Fields site. The Borough in general and Widnes in particular, have been lacking a high quality leisure attraction for many years. The creation of such a facility at the Waterfront once again emphasises the pivotal role that the scheme will play, not only in the commercial regeneration of the Borough, but also the cultural renaissance of Halton. (from “News”, Widnes Waterfront website tony mcdermott, 2008 http://www.widneswaterfront.co.uk/news/shownews.aspx?id=176
APPENDIX 16
Halton Borough Council (2005) Urban Renewal Baseline Extract from Pages 40 – 41 1. Skills and Employment 50.4 Although considered in more detail as part of the ‘Life Chances and Employment’ baseline report, there are issues which need to be considered as part of the urban renewal agenda. Halton performs poorly in terms of
skills and qualification levels, ranking 342nd
out of 408 districts. The 19+ age group within Halton has a particular lack of employment skills and qualifications. This is leading to new businesses recruiting from outside of the Borough and therefore the Borough not fully benefiting from the inward investment. (Areas such as Daresbury Park are often recruiting from outside the Borough.) This needs to be addressed by both priorities and there needs to be better links made between the two. Intelligence needs to be provided to schools and colleges to support curriculum development and provide more informed careers advice. There is a question whether colleges are providing what businesses want in terms of flexibility and vocational training opportunities. 50.5 Education in Halton and the UK is currently very focussed on academic qualifications and this perhaps doesn’t suit a number of students, who would learn more valuable skills and perhaps greater employment opportunities through a more structured approach to vocational learning. 50.6 Whilst we need to focus on the knowledge economy, the current skills mismatch is unlikely to be able to support a growth in this sector. We are also losing population in the 10-19 age group predicted at 20% loss over the next ten years, and 6% in the 20-30 age group. It is likely that these losses are due to families moving to Cheshire and surrounding areas, and students moving to university. This presents Halton with a challenge to make Halton more attractive and viable, in terms of being able to meet the needs and quality of life issues, to keep families here and attract new graduates back to the area. Businesses need to be encouraged to employ local graduates. These issues need to be addressed, if we are to have a young local skilled workforce in place, to underpin economic growth.
APPENDIX 17
The Economic DownturnDecember 2008
Focus On:
Welcome to “Focus” a new publication from the Research & Intelligence unit that gives a brief “data” overview of a topic that is currently of interest.
Focus will be produced on an adhoc basis when a topic (or the data) becomes available. If you have a topic to suggest please email: [email protected]
This FOCUS takes a “data” look at the economic downturn in Halton.
Key Messages
Halton is currently identified as one of the least vulnerable areas in the North West (Oxford Economics – July 2008).
The latest unemployment rate (claimant count1) for Halton, 4.1% (Nov 08), remains above the North West rate (3.2%). Windmill ward has the highest unemployment rate within Halton (6.5%).
Within the Liverpool City Region, Halton has had the largest increase in unemployment rates from Nov 07 to Nov 08; 2.8% to 4.1%.
Sales in houses have fallen within Halton from around 700 (Jul-Sep 07) to around 300 (Jul-Sep 08).
1The claimant count rate differs from the Annual Population Survey (Labour Force Survey) definition which is a modelled unemployment rate based on the sample from the Annual Population Survey. Unlike the claimant count rate, it is not available monthly and tends to be higher than the claimant count rate.
Focus On Dec 2008 www.halton.gov.uk/research
Vulnerability Index Nationally, or even globally, the economy is facing ‘credit crunch’ pressures which is restricting the supply of finance (particularly for large purchases such as houses) and is also putting a squeeze on disposable incomes.
Industries most likely to be affected are financial services, real estate, other business services, construction and retail and other consumer related industries (although this may change in the future as the wider economy begins to slow).
Oxford economics have produced a vulnerability index to identify which Local Authorities are most vulnerable to the credit crunch. Table 1 shows that Halton is one of the least vulnerable Local Authorities in the North West and England.
Table 1: Oxford Economics Vulnerability Index (July 2008)
Local Authority
North West Vulnerability Rank Local Authority
North West Vulnerability Rank
Chester 1 Oldham 23Macclesfield 2 Preston 24South Lakeland 3 Wirral 25Trafford 4 Hyndburn 26Sefton 5 Tameside 27Stockport 6 Rossendale 28Vale Royal 7 St Helens 29Bolton 8 Bury 30Manchester 9 South Ribble 31Warrington 10 Rochdale 32Eden 11 Lancaster 33Carlisle 12 Halton 34Congleton 13 Barrow-in-Furness 35Allerdale 14 Burnley 36Blackpool 15 Crewe and Nantwich 37Wigan 16 Ribble Valley 38Ellesmere Port and Neston 17 Knowsley 39West Lancashire 18 Pendle 40Salford 19 Fylde 41Liverpool 20 Blackburn with Darwen 42Chorley 21 Copeland 43Wyre 22
The vulnerability index shows that areas identified as the most vulnerable tend to be relatively prosperous areas, such as Chester, which has a high concentration of jobs in banking and auxiliary services. Early figures affected finance, construction and retail sectors first. Other sectors will be affected later; therefore, Halton’s vulnerability could change significantly.
Focus On Dec 2008 www.halton.gov.uk/research
Unemployment (Claimant count) Unemployment data (claimant count) is the most up to date information available. Data is available monthly and at ward level. Figure 1 shows the unemployment rates for Halton compared to the Local Authorities in the Liverpool City Region.
Figure 1: Local Authority unemployment rates, Nov 07 – Nov 08
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08
HaltonKnowsleyLiverpoolSeftonSt HelensWirralNorth West
In Halton the unemployment rate has remained higher than the North West and is currently the third highest in the City Region (with Liverpool and Knowsley having higher rates). Halton has also seen the highest increase in unemployment rates over the period Nov 07 to Nov 08. Figure 2 shows the November 2008 unemployment rates at ward level.
Figure 2: Ward unemployment rates, November 2008
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Daresb
ury
Beech
wood
Birchfi
eld
Farnwort
hHale
Heath
Norton
North
Halton
View
Broadh
eath
Halton
Brook
Norton
Sou
th
Hough
Green
Applet
on
Kingsw
ayDitto
n
Grange
Halton
Lea
Mersey
Riversi
de
Castle
fields
Windmill
Hill
Halton rate
Focus On Dec 2008 www.halton.gov.uk/research
The ward with the largest increase of unemployment, when compared to November 2007 is Mersey ward which has seen an increase of 2.9% (Halton saw a 1.3% increase).
House prices Average house prices within Halton haven’t changed significantly over the past year likely to be because there have been fewer sales. The number of sales has decreased, from over 700 (Jul-Sep 07) to under 300 (Jul-Sep 08).Halton Housing Trust’s waiting list currently stands at 2,104 households. This is set to increase after the Courts covering Widnes, Runcorn and St Helen’s issued 854 repossession orders between January and September 2008.
Other information The real impact of the economic downturn may not be visible in “official statistics” for a year or so although we are already seeing an impact in the unemployment rates. As identified by the Oxford Economics team the sectoral and geographic pattern of impact will change as the wider economy begins to slow.
More information Below are some websites that may provide more information related to this “Focus on”.
Topic Website Halton economic statistics
http://www2.halton.gov.uk/content/councilanddemocracy/council/research/haltoneconomicprofile/
DWP statistics http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/
Ward Profiles http://www2.halton.gov.uk/yourcouncil/uklocation/regionalmap/haltonmap/
HaltonObservatory http://halton.localknowledege.co.uk
Halton Research http://www.halton.gov.uk/research
BBC House prices http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/in_depth/uk_house_prices/html/houses.stm
Focus On Dec 2008 www.halton.gov.uk/research