new data shed light on large-animal extinction - nytimes

Upload: lsardinas

Post on 30-May-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 New Data Shed Light on Large-Animal Extinction - NYTimes

    1/2

    Data Shed Light on Large-Animal Extinction - NYTimes.com

    //www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/science/24fauna.html?_r=1&hpw=&pagewanted=print[11/20/2009 10:04:52 PM]

    his copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order presentation-eady copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers hereor use theReprints" tool that appears next to any article. Visit www.nytreprints.com for samples anddditional information. Order a reprint of this article now.

    November 24, 2009

    New Data Shed Light on Lar ge-Animal Extinction

    By NICHOLAS WADE

    Whenever modern humans reached a new continent in the expansion from their African homeland 50,0

    years ago, whether Australia, Europe or the Americas, all the large fauna quickly disappeared.

    This circumstantial evidence from the fossil record suggests that peoples first accomplishment upon

    eaching new territory was to hunt all its all large animals to death. But apologists for the human specie

    have invoked all manner of alternative agents, like climate changeand asteroid impacts.

    A careful analysis of lake deposits in New York and Wisconsin has brought new data to bear on this heat

    debate. A team led by Jacquelyn Gill, a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin, has uncovered a

    ritical sequence of events that rules out some explanations for the extinction of the large animals and

    everely constrains others.

    The first event documented by Ms. Gill and her colleagues is the pace of extinction in North America,

    known from other research to have affected all animal species over about 2,200 pounds and half of thos

    weighing more than about 70 pounds, the weight of a large dog.

    Ms. Gill found a clever proxy for these disappearances. A fungus known as Sporormiella has to pass

    hrough the digestive system to complete its life cycle, and its spores are found in animal dung. By

    measuring the number of spores in the lake deposits, the Wisconsin team documented the steady

    disappearance of large animals from 14,800 years to 13,700 years ago, they reported in Thursdays issue

    Science.

    The next clue to emerge from the lake deposits was the pollen of new plants including broad-leaved trees

    ike oak. This novel plant community seems to have emerged because it was released from being grazed

    arge mammals.

    The third clue is a layer of fine charcoal grains, presumably from fires that followed the buildup of wood

    This sequence of events has direct bearing on the megafauna whodunit. First, it rules out as the cause an

    mpact by an asteroid or comet that occurred 12,900 years ago the animals were dead long before.

    t also excludes the standard version of a more popular explanation, that of habitat loss due to climate

    hange. The extinction of large animals occurred before the emergence of the new plant communities. M

    Gill said that some other aspect of climate, like direct temperature change, could have been involved.

    http://www.nytreprints.com/http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/nicholas_wade/index.html?inline=nyt-perhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html?inline=nyt-classifierhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html?inline=nyt-classifierhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/university_of_wisconsin/index.html?inline=nyt-orghttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/university_of_wisconsin/index.html?inline=nyt-orghttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/university_of_wisconsin/index.html?inline=nyt-orghttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html?inline=nyt-classifierhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/nicholas_wade/index.html?inline=nyt-perhttp://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/printer-friendly&pos=Position1&sn2=336c557e/4f3dd5d2&sn1=7bdf3c33/8e8ecddf&camp=foxsearch2009_emailtools_1011079e_nyt5&ad=FMF_120x60_game_e&goto=http://www.fantasticthanksgiving.comhttp://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/printer-friendly&pos=Position1&sn2=336c557e/4f3dd5d2&sn1=7bdf3c33/8e8ecddf&camp=foxsearch2009_emailtools_1011079e_nyt5&ad=FMF_120x60_game_e&goto=http://www.fantasticthanksgiving.comhttp://www.nytreprints.com/http://www.nytimes.com/
  • 8/9/2019 New Data Shed Light on Large-Animal Extinction - NYTimes

    2/2

    Data Shed Light on Large-Animal Extinction - NYTimes.com

    //www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/science/24fauna.html?_r=1&hpw=&pagewanted=print[11/20/2009 10:04:52 PM]

    The third suspect to be cleared is the people of the Clovis culture, which first appeared some 13,000 yea

    ago, well after the extinction event. The Clovis people have long been considered the first inhabitants of

    North America, which they probably reached by trekking across the land bridge that joined Siberia and

    Alaska during the last Ice Age.

    So, do the new data exculpate humans of the murder of the North American mammoth? Not exactly.

    Butchered mammoth bones some 14,500 years old have been found in Wisconsin. There were evidently

    pre-Clovis people in North America, and they could have hunted the large animals to death.

    But Ms. Gill is not yet willing to declare people guilty. At this stage its too early to completely eliminate

    limate change, she said.

    Nor is it clear that the pre-Clovis people had the technology to take down large game like mammoths. M

    Gill plans to analyze many more lake bottoms before rendering any final verdict.

    Copyright 2009The New York Times Company

    Privacy Policy Terms of Service Search Corrections RSS First Look Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map

    http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/copyright.htmlhttp://www.nytco.com/http://www.nytimes.com/privacyhttp://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/agree.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/agree.htmlhttp://query.nytimes.com/gst/sitesearch_selector.html?query=&date_select=full&type=nythttp://query.nytimes.com/gst/sitesearch_selector.html?query=&date_select=full&type=nythttp://www.nytimes.com/corrections.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/corrections.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/rsshttp://firstlook.nytimes.com/http://firstlook.nytimes.com/http://www.nytimes.com/membercenter/sitehelp.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/membercenter/sitehelp.htmlhttp://nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/infoservdirectory.htmlhttp://www.nytco.com/careers/http://www.nytco.com/careers/http://spiderbites.nytimes.com/http://spiderbites.nytimes.com/http://www.nytco.com/careers/http://nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/infoservdirectory.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/membercenter/sitehelp.htmlhttp://firstlook.nytimes.com/http://www.nytimes.com/rsshttp://www.nytimes.com/corrections.htmlhttp://query.nytimes.com/gst/sitesearch_selector.html?query=&date_select=full&type=nythttp://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/agree.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/privacyhttp://www.nytco.com/http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/copyright.html