new directions in it society research jeff andrews, ut austin andrea montanari, stanford michelle...

7
New Directions in IT Society Research Jeff Andrews, UT Austin Andrea Montanari, Stanford Michelle Effros, Caltech Olgica Milenkovic, UIUC Alex Dimakis, UT Austin Lara Dolecek, UCLA Muriel Medard, MIT Sriram Vishwanath, UT Austin ISIT 2013

Upload: willa-russell

Post on 29-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: New Directions in IT Society Research Jeff Andrews, UT Austin Andrea Montanari, Stanford Michelle Effros, Caltech Olgica Milenkovic, UIUC Alex Dimakis,

New Directions in IT Society Research

Jeff Andrews, UT AustinAndrea Montanari, Stanford

Michelle Effros, CaltechOlgica Milenkovic, UIUCAlex Dimakis, UT Austin

Lara Dolecek, UCLAMuriel Medard, MIT

Sriram Vishwanath, UT Austin

ISIT 2013

Page 2: New Directions in IT Society Research Jeff Andrews, UT Austin Andrea Montanari, Stanford Michelle Effros, Caltech Olgica Milenkovic, UIUC Alex Dimakis,

Background

• IEEE has asked its societies to come up with a document detailing “Future Directions” • This would presumably go into an IEEE level report• Gerhard asked me to lead this effort

• We could also use the outcome for our own purposes, inc. IT Society newsletter, seeding funding agency ideas, etc. (ideas welcome)

• Seems a useful exercise, albeit a challenging one • If all this was clear and obvious, we’d have a lot more open

faculty positions and NSF funding for information theory• Related to our Outreach endeavors

• I formed the committee, aiming for diversity of research areas, blend of youth and senior people, top minds in variety of topics

Page 3: New Directions in IT Society Research Jeff Andrews, UT Austin Andrea Montanari, Stanford Michelle Effros, Caltech Olgica Milenkovic, UIUC Alex Dimakis,

Plan

• Emphasize the generality and universality of IT as a serious scientific discipline

• Tout its past triumphs and established intersections with and contributions to other fields

• Provide concise conjecture (total report < 10 pages) on areas for potential growth, new synergies, and articulate exciting open areas

• Avoid buzzwords, stick to fundamentals

• This requires more vision than any small group of people can provide• We approach this with humility, and greatly appreciate inputs from

the BoG and beyond• Ideally, we can advance a conversation that will be helpful

Page 4: New Directions in IT Society Research Jeff Andrews, UT Austin Andrea Montanari, Stanford Michelle Effros, Caltech Olgica Milenkovic, UIUC Alex Dimakis,

An Inspiration and Framework

• Develop a 2013 update of such a figure

• Articulate existing intersections (with a bit more detail)

• Conjecture on future intersections

Figure 1 of Cover and Thomas (1991)

Page 5: New Directions in IT Society Research Jeff Andrews, UT Austin Andrea Montanari, Stanford Michelle Effros, Caltech Olgica Milenkovic, UIUC Alex Dimakis,

Current Outline/Ideas

• Communications• Mostly reviewing past triumphs

• Networking• Fundamental properties of large

(general) networks and graphs

• Nano-circuits, distributed systems

• Control theory

• Signal Processing• Compressed sensing

• Lossy compression, inc. for huge data sets

• Implementation of IT-inspired ideas

• Human information acquisition

• Physics• Statistical physics, entropy

• Quantum information theory

• Statistics and Learning Theory• Includes application to enormous data

sets

• E.g. High-dimensional statistics, PCA

• Computer Science• Seen as a major area of blurring with us

(list decoding, security, etc.)

• Computation as a constraint?

• Genetics and Molecular Biology• DNA detection, processing, computing

• Virology

• Neuroscience• Encoding, storage, processing of

information in neural networks

• Economics and Finance• (See graph theory above)

• Universal investment theory

Page 6: New Directions in IT Society Research Jeff Andrews, UT Austin Andrea Montanari, Stanford Michelle Effros, Caltech Olgica Milenkovic, UIUC Alex Dimakis,

Discussion/Questions for BoG

• Are key areas missing? Can any be combined?

• To cite or not?

• Is this a worthy exercise in your opinion?

Page 7: New Directions in IT Society Research Jeff Andrews, UT Austin Andrea Montanari, Stanford Michelle Effros, Caltech Olgica Milenkovic, UIUC Alex Dimakis,

Definition of Information Theory (back up slide)

Definition. Information theory is a mathematical science that studies the ultimate limits of, and optimal methods and algorithms for:

1. The representation of information;

2. The communication of information;

3. The processing and utilization of information.