new haven 20 - ricci's reply

Upload: borzechowski7590

Post on 30-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 New Haven 20 - Ricci's Reply

    1/4

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

    ------------------------------------------------------------x

    FRANK RICCI, ET AL. :

    plaintiffs :

    :

    v. : NO: 3:04-CV-1109 (JBA)

    :

    JOHN DESTEFANO, JR, ET AL. :

    defendants : November 20, 2009

    -----------------------------------------------------------x

    DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS

    REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE

    On November 13, 2009, both parties submitted proposed orders regarding the

    promotion of certain plaintiffs. On November 17, 2009, the plaintiffs requested a status

    conference regarding the proposed orders. The City of New Haven (the City) hereby

    responds to that request.

    The City is willing to attend another status conference if the Court so orders, to the

    extent one is necessary. However, there is no confusion as to how many or which plaintiffs

    will be promoted pursuant to the Citys proposed order. In its November 6th

    letter to

    plaintiffs counsel, the City listed those 14 plaintiffs who would have been promoted within

    the two-year life of the eligible lists and thus will be promoted, once the eligible lists are

    certified.

  • 8/14/2019 New Haven 20 - Ricci's Reply

    2/4

    - 2 -

    Eligible lists, displaying the names and ranks of all passing candidates on these

    exams, have not been prepared by the City. In fact, the City has never publicly released the

    identities or ranks of the passing candidates. While the parties to the litigation have

    information regarding candidates scores and ranks, this information has been sealed from

    the public out of a concern for the interests of the non-party candidates. Consistent with the

    Supreme Courts opinion in this case, it is important that the eligible lists be prepared and

    certified in order to avoid confusion, remove any notion of secrecy and ensure that only

    those who would have been promoted based on their performance on the 2003 exams have

    an opportunity for promotion now. SeeRicci v. DeStefano, et al. , --- U.S. ---, 129 S.Ct.

    2658, 2681 (2009) (Ifafter it certifies the test results the City faces a disparate-impact

    suit, then in light of our holding today it should be clear that the City would avoid disparate-

    impact liability based on the strong basis in evidence that, had it not certified the results, it

    would have been subject to disparate-treatment liability.) (emphasis added). Once the lists

    are certified, the Board of Fire Commissioners would then promote, in rank order, those

    plaintiffs who would have been promoted during the two-year life of the lists. Additionally,

    the City would have the discretion to promote non-plaintiffs, but only those non-plaintiffs

    who would have been promoted if the City had certified the lists in 2004.

  • 8/14/2019 New Haven 20 - Ricci's Reply

    3/4

    - 3 -

    In short, the Citys proposed order ensures that what the Supreme Court considered

    to violate Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964 -- the Citys failure to certify the results of

    the 2003 exams and promote consistent with those results -- is remedied and nothing more.

    THE DEFENDANT

    CITY OF NEW HAVEN

    By /s/

    Richard A. Roberts (ct 07665)

    Stacey L. Pitcher (ct27111)

    Todd J. Richardson (ct26699)

    NUZZO & ROBERTS, L.L.C.

    One Town Center

    P.O. Box 747

    Cheshire, Connecticut 06410

    Tel: (203) 250-2000

    Fax: (203) [email protected]

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • 8/14/2019 New Haven 20 - Ricci's Reply

    4/4

    - 4 -

    CERTIFICATION

    This is to certify that on November 20, 2009, a copy of the foregoing was filed

    electronically and served by mail on anyone unable to accept electronic filing. Notice of

    this filing will be sent by e-mail to all parties by operation of the Court(s) electronic filing

    system or by mail to anyone unable to accept electronic filing as indicated on the Notice of

    Electronic Filing. Parties may access this filing through the Court's CM/ECF system.

    Karen Lee Torre, Esq.

    Norman A. Pattis, Esq.

    Law Offices of Norm Pattis, LLC

    129 Church Street, Suite 405

    New Haven, CT 06510

    Victor A. Bolden, Esq.

    Kathleen M. Foster, Esq.

    City of New Haven

    165 Church Street, 4th

    Floor

    New Haven, CT 06510

    W. Martyn Philpot, Jr.

    Law Office of W. Martyn Philpot

    409 Orange Street

    New Haven, CT 06511

    Christy B. Bishop, Esq.

    Dennis R. Thompson, Esq.

    Thompson & Bishop

    2719 Manchester Road

    Akron, OH 44319

    /s/Richard A. Roberts

    \\fp\nuzzo\WP\401002\259\REMAND\PLEADINGS\Resp to Req for Status Conf 11 20 09.doc