Devika et al., J Clinic Experiment Pathol 2012, 2:3 DOI: 10.4172/2161-0681.1000111

Volume 2 • Issue 3 • 1000111J Clinic Experiment PatholISSN: 2161-0681 JCEP, an open access journal

Open AccessCase Report

A Rare Case of a Mixed Phenotypic Acute Leukemia (Mpal) - Report From a Tertiary Care HospitalDevika Gupta, Tathagata Chatterjee*, Srishti Gupta and Ajay Sharma

Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), India

AbstractThe term mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) applies to both acute bilineal leukemia, that is, leukemias

containing a separate population of blasts of more than one lineage and biphenotypic leukemia containing a single population of blasts co expressing antigens of more than one lineage.

Here we report a rare case of MPAL –NOS T/Megakaryocytic type in a 4 year old female child which has not been reported so far. She presented with fever, generalized weakness and right calf pain. Her peripheral blood picture revealed a leuco-erythroblastic blood picture with two population of blasts .Bone marrow biopsy revealed scattered lymphoblast amidst clusters of megakaryoblast. Immunohistochemical examination was done which revealed one population to be positive for CD3 and other population to be CD61 positive. Patient was diagnosed as a case of MPAL-NOS T/megakaryocytic type and was subsequently given AML chemotherapy. Patient achieved complete morphological remission and thereafter received an allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Patient is presently doing well after eighteen months of bone marrow transplant and has had no episode of relapse. This case report highlights the shortcomings of the WHO 2008 requirements for assigning more than one lineage to a leukemia as there is no inclusion criteria for megakaryocytic lineage which is myeloperoxidase negative.

*Corresponding author: Tathagata Chatterjee, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt-110010, India, Tel: +919899190802; E-mail: ctathagat@hotmail.com

Received October 10, 2011; Accepted March 28, 2012; Published March 30, 2012

Citation: Devika G, Chatterjee T, Srishti G, Ajay S (2012) A Rare Case of a Mixed Phenotypic Acute Leukemia (Mpal) - Report From a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clinic Experiment Pathol 2:111. doi:10.4172/2161-0681.1000111

Copyright: © 2012 Devika G, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Keywords: MPAL; EGIL; Biphenotypic leukemia

IntroductionAmbiguous leukemias are rare and account for 4% of all cases

of acute leukemia and frequently demonstrate an aggressive disease course with mean survival rates less than those of leukemias derived from single cell lineage.

The numerical scoring system for defining mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) was formulated by European Group for the the immunological classification of leukemias (EGIL) [1,2]. This scoring system is aimed at distinguishing cases of MPAL from those with aberrant expression i.e. Ly+AML and My+ALL. MPAL or biphenotypic leukemia is defined when the score from two separate lineages is more than two. Antigens detected by flow cytometric immunophenotyping were assigned a score of 2, 1 or 0.5 depending on specificity of a particular antigen for myeloid, T lymphoid or B lymphoid lineage. Cases having a score of more than 2 in both lineages are designated as biphenotypic [3,4].

In the WHO 2008 classification of leukemias of ambiguous lineage, the requirement for assigning more than one lineage to a single blast population has been revised (Table 1).

Broadly MPAL includes acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL), MPAL with t (9; 22), MPAL with t(v;11q23), MPAL B/myeloid -NOS, MPAL T/myeloid -NOS, MPAL –NOS-rare types and other ambiguous lineage leukemias. Leukemias that switch their lineage of origin during therapy or show poorly differentiated or undifferentiated features are also included in this category.

Case ReportA 4 year old female child presented to our hospital with a

history of fever, right leg pain and generalized weakness of one month duration. General physical examination revealed pallor, generalized lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly. The child had no phenotypic features or any constitutional abnormalities of chromosome 21 (Down syndrome). Her hematological investigations

revealed a hemoglobin of 8.2gm%, total leucocyte count -21,000/mm3 and a platelet count of 30,000/mm3. Colour Doppler imaging of right leg was normal. X-ray of the right leg including the knee and Hip Joint did not reveal any bony and soft tissue lesion. Her leg pains were the presenting feature in a peripheral hospital for which she was treated with Azithromycin for a suspected infectious aetiology and the pain resolved a few days after her admission in our hospital.

Myeloid lineageMyeloperoxidase (flow cytometry, immunochemistry or cytochemistry)

OrMonocytic differentiation (at least 2 of the following:NSE,CD11c,CD14,CD64,lysozyme)T lineageCytoplasmic CD3( flow cytometry with antibodies to CD3 epsilon chain; immunohistochemistry using polyclonal anti- CD3 antibody may detect CD3 zeta chain, which is not T-cell specific)

OrSurface CD3 (rare in mixed phenotypic acute leukemia)B lineage (multiple antigens required)Strong CD19 with at least one of the following strongly expressed: CD79a, cCD22,CD10

OrWeak CD19 with at least 2 of the following strongly expressed: CD79a, cCD22,CD10

Table 1: Requirements for assigning more than one lineage to a single blast population (WHO 2008).

Jour

nal o

f Clin

ical & Experimental Pathology

ISSN: 2161-0681

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Pathology

Citation: Devika G, Chatterjee T, Srishti G, Ajay S (2012) A Rare Case of a Mixed Phenotypic Acute Leukemia (Mpal) - Report From a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clinic Experiment Pathol 2:111. doi:10.4172/2161-0681.1000111

Page 2 of 3

Volume 2 • Issue 3 • 1000111J Clinic Experiment PatholISSN: 2161-0681 JCEP, an open access journal

Peripheral blood film showed intermediate to late normoblasts and dual population of blasts amounting to 40% of total nucleated cells. No spherocytes and schistocytes were noted. One population of blasts resembled morphologically lymphoblast and few appeared like myeloblasts with cytoplasmic budding Large platelets were noted with few megakaryocytic fragments. Cytochemical tests-MPO and PAS stain were done on peripheral blood and showed the blasts were negative for both stains. Patient had no extramedullary leukemic deposits. Subsequently a posterior iliac crest Bone marrow aspiration and core biopsy were performed. Bone marrow aspirate was submitted for morphological, cytochemical and cytogenetic analysis. Bone marrow biopsy was submitted for histopathological examination.

Bone marrow aspirate was diluted however few cellular areas showed blasts which were medium to large sized with irregular nuclei with fine reticular chromatin and ,1-2 nucleoli with basophilic cytoplasm and cytoplasmic blebs. Another population of small blast with high N:C ratio and scant cytoplasm was also noted.Both the blasts on cytochemical stains were MPO, PAS and NSE negative.

Bone marrow biopsy was packed with blasts with a cellularity of 100%. Sections revealed sheets of megakaryoblasts along with a separate cluster of lymphoblasts that had displaced the marrow constituents (Figure 1). Reticulin stain showed grade II fibrosis. Immunohistochemical stains against antigen CD61,MPO,CD3,CD20 and CD34 were performed using standard peroxidase – antiperoxidase technique. Results showed strong positivity for CD61 in megakaryoblasts and sCD3 and CD34 positivity in surrounding blast clusters.Anti MPO was negative in both the blast population.

Conventional cytogenetics was performed. Chromosomal analysis (GTG-banding at 550 band resolution) revealed abnormalities in chromosomes 1,3,7 and 21 [Karyotype- 47,XX,+21, +21, rob(21 ;21), t(1;7), t(1 ,3,7)] (Figure 2).

Patient was given two cycles of AML chemotherapy comprising of idarubicin, cytosine and etoposide after which the two marrow aspirates done at one month interval showed complete morphological remission. Remission induction was with AML-BFM93 protocol in the form of cytosine 50mg/m2 + Idarubicin 12mg/m2 + etoposide 80mg/m2 and intensification with cytosine 3g/m2 and Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2. Consolidation was with Thioguanine, Prednisolone, Vincristine,

Doxorubicin, Cytosine, ITcytosine and Cyclophophamide as per standard doses for the child. Complete remission (CR) was defined by the presence of less than 5% blasts in the bone marrow, absence of extramedullary leukemia, and peripheral blood count recovery with a neutrophil count of at least 1 x 109/L and a platelet count of at least 100 x 109/L [5]. The first marrow done after induction chemotherapy showed <5% blasts and Gd I fibrosis. The second marrow showed complete disappearence of blasts with reversal of marrow fibrosis (Reticulin stain grade 0). Cytogenetic studies in remission marrow was not performed however.

Subsequently after 4 months of being diagnosed the child was planned for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant from HLA identical sibling Bone marrow Donor. Patient and sibling donor’s HLA typing was done by DNA based method. Patient was 11/12 antigen match with her donor at HLA class I (A,B,Cw) and HLA class II (DPβ, DQβ and DR loci). Pre BMT regimen comprised of Tab Busulfan 14 mg and Inj Cyclophosphamide 60mg per kg body weight.

Patient engrafted the bone marrow transplant, however on D+9 she developed skin graft versus host disease (GVHD) grade III in form of diffuse erythematous macular rashes over trunk and proximal extremities which progressed to generalized erythroderma with desquamation. She also developed Gut GVHD in form of loose stools. Colonoscopy showed multiple erythematous patches and erosions in rectosigmoid region. Colonic biopsy showed grade I GVHD with marked apoptosis of epithelial cells in form of apoptotic bodies and nuclear debris. Patient was managed on Mycophenolate mofetil, Tacrolimus, Methylprednisolone and Meropenem after which marked improvement was noted. The patient responded clinically and her blood counts became normal. Post HSCT no marrow study was done. The immunosuppressive drugs were tapered off gradually. Her peripheral blood samples which were sent for chimerism studies in our Transplant lab revealed complete chimerism on day D+152 as well as on day D +246 and finally on D+568 as per our BMT file records. The child has regained her appetite and has started going to a play school under constant supervision.

DiscussionWe report an unusual case of MPAL in which there was dual

population of blasts. One expressing sCD3, an antigen reported to

a

b

c

Figure 1: a) shows dual population of blasts, bigger arrow showing lympho-blasts and smaller arrow showing megakaryoblasts (x40). b) shows clusters of megakaryoblasts with few interspersed lymphoblasts (x40). c) shows one paratrabecular space packed with sheets of blasts (H&E stain x10).

Figure 2: Chromosomal analysis (GTG-banding at 500 band resolution) revealed abnormalities in chromosome 1, 3, 7 and 21(arrows).

Citation: Devika G, Chatterjee T, Srishti G, Ajay S (2012) A Rare Case of a Mixed Phenotypic Acute Leukemia (Mpal) - Report From a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clinic Experiment Pathol 2:111. doi:10.4172/2161-0681.1000111

Page 3 of 3

Volume 2 • Issue 3 • 1000111J Clinic Experiment PatholISSN: 2161-0681 JCEP, an open access journal

be highly sensitive for T lymphoid lineage and the other population of blasts expressing CD61 strongly which is antigen specific for megakaryoblasts. Both EGIL scoring system and WHO 2008 does not include megakaryoblastic/erythroblast IPT markers in its scoring system.

To date there has been no reports of B or T/Megakaryocytic or B or T/Erythroleukemias [6]. Our case fits into the subset of MPAL –NOS introduced in latest WHO 2008 classification of leukemias ofambiguous lineage.

Studies have demonstrated that structural chromosome abnormalities are frequent and that there is high incidence of Philadelphia chromosome (9; 22) seen in one third of the cases, rearrangements involving 11q23 and complex cytogenetic abnormality [7,8].

Leukemias of ambiguous lineage with cytogenetic abnormalities are believed to be associated with a poorer prognosis than are leukemias without demonstrable abnormalities. In our case complex cytogenetic abnormality by conventional cytogenetics was noted.

The optimal therapeutic approach to these cases, especially in pediatric patients has not been defined. It is still unclear whether patients with biphenotypic leukemia fare better on induction regimes designed for ALL or AML. Studies show poor treatment outcome in patients of biphenotypic leukemia [9-11].

Patient was given AML induction therapy with cytosine, idarubicin and etoposide with which she achieved complete morphological remission. Our patient is at present symptom free after eighteen months of having undergone Allogenic Bone marrow HSCT. She is on monthly follow up in haematology OPD.

ConclusionFirstly, it highlights the shortcomings of WHO 2008 system of

classifying MPAL as they have not included AML M7/T cell leukemias. Secondly, leukemias of AML-M7/T cell lineage do occur on the contrary to many who believe they might not occur [3]. Thirdly, AML

chemotherapy followed by allogeneic bone marrow transplant in such patients gives a good result and may be line of treatment for such patients.

Acknowledgement

Authors thank Religare Diagnostics Limited, India for cytogenetic evaluation.

References

1. Catovsky D, Matutes E, Buccheri V, Shetty V, Hanslip J, et al. (1991) A classification of acute leukemia for the 1990s. Ann Hematol 62: 16-21.

2. Buccheri V, Matutes E, Dyer MJ, Catovsky D (1993) Lineage commitment in biphenotypic acute leukemia Leukemia 7: 919-927.

3. Borowitz MJ, Bene MC, Harris NL, Porwit A, Matutes E (2008) Acute Leukemias of ambiguous lineage in WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France.

4. Bene MC, Castoldi G, Knapp W, Ludwig WD, Matutes E, et al. (1995) Proposals for the immunological classification of acute leukemias. European Group for the immunological characterization of Leukemias(EGIL). Leukemia 9: 1783-1786.

5. Estey EH, Thall PF, Wang X, Verstovsek S, Cortes J, et al. (2003) Effect of circulating blasts at time of complete remission on subsequent relapse-free survival time in newly diagnosed AML. Blood 102: 3097-3099.

6. Adolfsson J, Mansson R, Buza –Vidas N, Hultquist A, Liuba K, et al. (2005) Identification of Flt3+ Lymphomyeloid stem cells lacking erythro-megakaryocytic potential a revised road map for adult blood lineage commitment. Cell 121: 295-306.

7. Cuneo A, Ferrant A, Michaux JL, Demuynck H, Boogaerts M, et al. (1996) Philadelphia chromosome positive acute myeloid leukemia: cytoimmunologic and cytogenetic features. Haematologica 81: 423-427.

8. Carbonell F, Swansbury J, Min T, Matutes E, Farahat N, et al. (1996) Cytogenetic findings in acute biphenotypic leukaemia. Leukemia 10: 1283-1287.

9. Rubio MT, Dhedin N, Boucheix C, Bourhis JH, Reman O, et al. (2003) Adult T-biphenotypic acute leukaemia: Clinical and biological features and outcome. Br J Haematol 123: 842-849.

10. Aribi A, Bueso-Ramos C, Estey E, Estrov Z, O’Brien S, et al. (2007) Biphenotypic acute leukaemia: A case series. Br J Haematol 138: 213-216.

11. Rubnitz JE, Onciu M, Pounds S, Shurtleff S, Cao X, et al. (2009) Acute mixed lineage leukemia in children: The experience of St Jude Childrens Research Hospital. Blood 113: 5083-5089.