new lax pairs and darboux transformation and its application to a
TRANSCRIPT
Hindawi Publishing CorporationMathematical Problems in EngineeringVolume 2013 Article ID 548690 8 pageshttpdxdoiorg1011552013548690
Research ArticleNew Lax Pairs and Darboux Transformation and Its Applicationto a Shallow Water Wave Model of Generalized KdV Type
Huizhang Yang1 and Weiguo Rui2
1 College of Mathematics of Honghe University Mengzi Yunnan 661100 China2 College of Mathematics of Chongqing Normal University Chongqing 401331 China
Correspondence should be addressed to Weiguo Rui weiguorhhualiyuncom
Received 30 March 2013 Accepted 5 September 2013
Academic Editor Sarp Adali
Copyright copy 2013 H Yang and W RuiThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited
New Lax pairs of a shallow water wave model of generalized KdV equation type are presented According to this Lax pair weconstructed a new spectral problem By using this spectral problem we constructed Darboux transformation with the help of agauge transformation Applying this Darboux transformation some new exact solutions including double-soliton solution of theshallow water wave model of generalized KdV equation type are obtained In order to visually show dynamical behaviors of thesedouble soliton solutions we plot graphs of profiles of them and discuss their dynamical properties
1 Introduction
It is well known that the Lax pair and Darboux transforma-tion can be employed to obtain multisoliton solution of non-linear evolution equations Darboux transformations provideus with purely algebraic powerful method to constructsolutions for systems of nonlinear equations In recent yearsmore and more researchers used the Lax pair and Darbouxtransformation to investigate soliton solutions of classicalnonlinear wave equations and some new soliton equationswhich were generated by new spectral problems see [1ndash30] and references cited therein In general a systematicaltheory on such Darboux transformation even for 119899 times 119899
matrix spectral problem and the resulting zero curvatureequation has a beautiful algebraic structure for associatedevolution equations which tells symmetry algebras of theobtained evolution equations see [31 32] and references citedtherein Sometimes it is found that there are many infinitysymmetries from the adopted zero curvature equation
In this paper we will investigate the Lax pairs Darbouxtransformation and double soliton solutions of the followingfamous shallow water wave model of generalized KdV equa-tion type
119906119905minus
ℎ2
0
3
119906119909119909119905+ 1198880119906119909+
3120572
2
119906119906119909minus
1198880ℎ2
0
6
119906119909119909119909
=
120572ℎ2
0
3
119906119909119906119909119909+
120572ℎ2
0
6
119906119906119909119909119909
(1)
which appeared in [33] where 0 lt 120572 ≪ 1 is a small-amplitude parameter Only dropping the right-hand side of(1) gives BBM equation Dropping the right-hand side of(1) and replacing the term 119906
119909119909119905by the term minus119888
0119906119909119909119909
giveKdV equation [34] Thus (1) can be seen as a BBM equationextended by retaining higher order terms in an asymptoticexpansion in terms of the small-amplitude parameter 120572Dropping the term minus(119888
0ℎ2
06)119906119909119909119909
from (1) and letting ℎ0=
radic3 1198880= 2120581 120572 = 2 (1) becomes the celebrated Camassa-
Holm equation [33] as follows
119906119905+ 2120581 minus 119906
119909119909119905+ 3119906119906
119909= 2119906119909119906119909119909+ 119906119906119909119909119909 (2)
where 119906 is the fluid velocity in the 119909 direction (or equivalentto the height of the waterrsquos free surface above a flat bottom) 120581is a constant related to the critical shallow water wave speedand subscripts denote partial derivatives Letting 119888
0= 1 ] =
minus(13)ℎ2
0 120574 = (32)120572 120573 = minus(16)ℎ
2
01198880 (1) can be rewritten as
119906119905+ 119906119909+ ]119906119909119909119905+ 120573119906119909119909119909
+ 120574119906119906119909+
1
3
120574] (119906119906119909119909119909
+ 2119906119909119906119909119909)=0
(3)
2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
which comes from physical considerations via the method-ology introduced by Fuchssteiner and Fokas in [35 36] TheLax pairs of (3) with 120574 = 1 are given by [37 38] as follows
Ψ119909119909= [1198962(1 minus V) +
V
4]]Ψ = 0 120590V = 119906 + ]119906
119909119909
120590 =
120573 minus ]
2]
(4)
Ψ119905+ (minus
1
2
+ 119888)Ψ + (119906 +
120573
]+
2120590
4]1198962 minus 1)Ψ119909= 0 (5)
where 119888 is an arbitrary constant It is a pity that the [37] is not aformal publication and it is only preprint paper so we cannotknow its reality contents whether the authors have obtainedsoliton solutions of (3) by the Lax pairs (4) and (5) In fact(3) has been studied by many authors in recent years see thefollowing brief introductions
In [39] by using the bifurcation theory of dynamicsystem some subsection-function and implicit function solu-tions such as compactons solitary waves smooth periodicwaves and nonsmooth periodic waves with peaks as well asthe existence conditions have been presented by Bi By usingthe same method Li and Zhang [40] studied a generalizationform of the modified KdV equation which is more complexthan (3) In [40] the existence of solitary wave kink andantikink wave solutions and uncountably many smooth andnonsmooth periodic wave solutions are discussed By usingthe improved method named integral bifurcation method[41] Rui et al [42] obtain all kinds of soliton-like or kink-likewave solutions periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop smooth compacton-like periodic wave solutions and
nonsmooth periodic cusp wave solutions for (3) In [43]Long and Chen discussed the existence of solitary wave cuspwave periodic wave periodic cusp wave and compactonswere for (3) From the above references (1) (ie (3)) is a veryimportant water wave model
The rest of this paper is organized as follows In Section 2we will derive new Lax pair and Darboux transformationof (1) In Section 3 by using this Darboux transformationwe will investigate soliton solutions of (1) and discuss thedynamic properties of these soliton solutions
2 Lax Pair and Darboux Transformation of (1)Through a series of tedious computation we obtain Lax pairsof (1) as follows
120601119909119909= (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)120601 (6)
120601119905= minus(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)120601119909+
120572
4
119906119909120601 (7)
Obviously the Lax pairs (6) and (7) are different from theLax pairs (4) and (5) under 119888
0= 1 ] = minus(13)ℎ
2
0 120574 =
(32)120572 120573 = minus(16)ℎ2
01198880 They are new Lax pairs which we
obtained By using the new Lax pairs (6) and (7) we willconstruct a Darboux transformation for obtaining solitonsolutions of (1)
First we consider the following spectral problems
120601119909= M120601 120601
119905= N120601 (8)
with
M = (
0 1
minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
0
)
N = (
120572
4
119906119909
minus(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)(minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
) minus
120572
4
119906119909
)
(9)
where 120572 is a constant 120582 is a spectral parameter and 119906 is apotential function From compatibility condition 120601
119909119909119905= 120601119905119909119909
yields a zero curvature equation M119905minus N119909+ [MN] = O
Substituting M N into the zero curvature equation by adirect calculation (1) is obtained successfully
Next we will construct a Darboux Transformation (DT)of the spectral problems (8) In fact the DT is actually a gaugetransformation
120601 = T120601 (10)
of the spectral problems (8) It is required that 120601 also satisfiesthe same form of spectral problems
120601119909= M120601 M = (T
119909+ TM)Tminus1 (11)
120601119905= N120601 N = (T
119905+ TN)Tminus1 (12)
It means that we have to find a matrix T such that the oldpotential 119906 is replaced by the new one 119906
Suppose
T = T (120582) = (119860 (120582) 119861 (120582)119862 (120582) 119863 (120582)
) (13)
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 3
where
119860 (120582) = 119860119873(120582119873+
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119860119896120582119896)
119861 (120582) = 119860119873(
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119861119896120582119896)
(14)
119862 (120582) =
1
119860119873
(
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119862119896120582119896)
119863 (120582) =
1
119860119873
(120582119873+
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119863119896120582119896)
(15)
and 119860119873 119860119896 119861119896 119862119896 and 119863
119896(0 le 119896 le 119873 minus 1) are functions
of 119909 and 119905Let 120601(120582
119895) = (120601
1(120582119895) 1206012(120582119895))119879 120595(120582119895) = (120595
1(120582119895) 1205952(120582119895))119879
be two basic solutions of (8) From (10) there exist constants119903119895(0 le 119895 le 119873 minus 1) which satisfy
(119860 (120582119895) 1206011(120582119895) + 119861 (120582
119895) 1206012(120582119895))
minus 119903119895(119860 (120582
119895) 1205951(120582119895) + 119861 (120582
119895) 1205952(120582119895)) = 0
(119862 (120582119895) 1206011(120582119895) + 119863 (120582
119895) 1206012(120582119895))
minus 119903119895(119862 (120582
119895) 1205951(120582119895) + 119863 (120582
119895) 1205952(120582119895)) = 0
(16)
Further (16) can be written as a linear algebraic system
119860(120582119895) + 120575119895119861 (120582119895) = 0 119862 (120582
119895) + 120575119895119863(120582119895) = 0 (17)
That is119873minus1
sum
119896=0
(119860119896+ 120575119895119861119896) 120582119896
119895=minus120582119873
119895
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
(119862119896+ 120575119895119863119896) 120582119896
119895=minus120575119895120582119873
119895
(18)
where
120575119895=
1206012(120582119895) minus 1199031198951205952(120582119895)
1206011(120582119895) minus 1199031198951205951(120582119895)
1 le 119895 le 2119873 (19)
and the constants 120582119895(120582119896= 120582119904as 119896 = 119904) 119903
119895are suitably chosen
such that determinant of coefficients for (18) is nonzeroTherefore 119860
119873 119860119896 119861119896 119862119896 and 119863
119896(0 le 119896 le 119873 minus 1) are
uniquely determined by (18)Equations (14) and (15) show that the detT(120582) is a 2119873th-
order polynomial in 120582 and
detT (120582119895) = 119860 (120582
119895)119863 (120582
119895) minus 119861 (120582
119895) 119862 (120582
119895) (20)
On the other hand from (17) we have 119860(120582119895) = minus120575
119895119861(120582119895)
119862(120582119895) = minus120575
119895119863(120582119895) Thus we have
detT (120582) = 1205732119873minus1
prod
119895=1
(120582 minus 120582119895) (21)
where 120573 is independent of 120582 Equation (21) implies that120582119895(1 le 119895 le 2119873) are 2119873 roots of detT(120582)Second we prove the following theory of Darboux trans-
formation for special variable
Theorem 1 Let 119860119873satisfy
1198602
119873= 1 (22)
Then the matrixM determined by (11) has the same form asMthat is
M = (
0 1
minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
0
) (23)
where the transformation from the old potential 119906 into new one119906 is given by
119906 = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
(24)
119860119873minus1119909
= 119862119873minus1
minus
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
119861119873minus1119909
= 119863119873minus1
minus 119860119873minus1
119862119873minus1119909
=
3
4ℎ2
0
(119860119873minus1
minus 119863119873minus1
) +
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
119863119873minus1119909
=
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
minus 119862119873minus1
(25)
Proof Let Tminus1 = Tlowast detT and
(T119909+ TM)Tlowast = (11989111 (120582) 11989112 (120582)
11989121(120582) 119891
22(120582)) (26)
It is easy to see that 11989111(120582) and 119891
22(120582) are 2119873th-order
polynomials in 120582 11989112(120582) and 119891
21(120582) are (2119873 minus 1)th-order
polynomials in 120582 From (19) and (8) we find
120575119895119909= minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
minus 1205752
119895 (27)
Through direct calculation all 120582119895(0 le 119895 le 2119873) are roots of
119891119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) Together with (21) and (26) we get
(T119909+ TM)Tlowast = (detT) 119875 (120582) (28)
with
119875 (120582) = (
119901(0)
11119901(0)
12
119901(0)
21119901(0)
22
) (29)
where 119901(0)119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) are independent of spectral parameter
120582 Indeed (28) can be written as
T119909+ TM = 119875 (120582)T (30)
4 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Comparing the coefficients of 120582119873 in (30) we find
119901(0)
11= minus119901(0)
22= 120597119909ln119860119873 119901
(0)
12= 1198602
119873
119901(0)
21=
1
1198602
119873
3
4ℎ2
0
(31)
Substituting (22) into (31) yields
119901(0)
11= minus119901(0)
22= 0 119901
(0)
12= 1198602
119873= 1 (32)
From (22) (24) (25) and (31) and noticing 119906 in (23) we get
119901(0)
21= minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
(33)
Thus 119875(120582) = M The proof of Theorem 1 is completed
Finally by using same way toTheorem 1 we prove thatNin (12) has the same form asN under the transformation (10)and (24) see the following theory and its proof
Theorem 2 ThematrixN defined by (12) has the same type asN in which the old potential 119906 is mapped into 119906 via the sameDT (24)
Proof Let Tminus1 = Tlowast detT and
(T119905+ TN)Tlowast = (11989211 (120582) 11989212 (120582)
11989221(120582) 119892
22(120582)) (34)
It is easy to see that 11989211(120582) and 119892
22(120582) are 2119873th-order
polynomials in 120582 11989212(120582) and 119892
21(120582) are (2119873 + 1)th-order
polynomials in 120582 By using (19) and (8) we obtain
120575119895119905=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times(minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
minus
120572
2
119906119909120575119895+ (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)1205752
119895
(35)
Through direct calculation all 120582119895(0 le 119895 le 2119873) are roots of
119892119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) Together with (21) and (34) we get
(T119905+ TN)Tlowast = (detT) 119876 (120582) (36)
with
119876 (120582) = (
119902(0)
11119902(1)
12120582 + 119902(0)
12
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21119902(0)
22
) (37)
where 119902(119897)119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2 119897 = 0 1) are independent of spectral
parameter 120582 Equation (37) can be written as
T119905+ TN = 119876 (120582)T (38)
Comparing the coefficients of 120582119873+1 and 120582119873 in (38) leadsto
119902(1)
12= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873 119902
(1)
21= minus
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
(39)
119902(0)
11= 120597119905ln119860119873+
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
(40)
119902(0)
12= minus(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)1198602
119873minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873119860119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873119863119873minus1
(41)
119902(0)
21=
1
1198602
119873
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
1
1198602
119873
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)minus
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
+
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
)
+
119860119873minus1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
(42)
119902(0)
22= minus120597119905ln119860119873minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
minus
120572
4
119906119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
(43)
Substituting (22) (24) and (25) into (40) to (43) we canget
119902(0)
11=
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909
=
120572
4
119906119909
119902(1)
12120582 + 119902(0)
12
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
120582 minus (
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906) minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
120582 minus (
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906) minus
3120572
ℎ2
0
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(119860119873minus1
+ 119863119873minus1
)
= minus(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
119902(0)
22= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
minus
120572
4
119906119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
= minus
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909
= minus
120572
4
119906119909
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 5
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
120582+
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(44)
On the other hand from (24) (25) and (33) we have
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
=
120572
4
119906119909119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909119909
minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
6120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(45)
From (44) and (45) obviously we have
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
(46)
Thus 119876(120582) = N and this completes the proof of Theorem 2
3 Exact Soliton Solution of (1) andIts Dynamic Properties
In this section we will construct the explicit solutions ofthe integrable shallow water wave (1) by using the Darbouxtransformation (24)
Choosing 119906 = 1199060(1199060is an arbitrary constant) as a seed
solution of (1) and substituting 119906 = 1199060into the spectral
problems (8) Then we get two basic solutions of (8) asfollows
120601 (120582119895) = (
cosh 120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
sinh120583119895
)
120595 (120582119895) = (
sinh120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
cosh 120583119895
)
(47)
with
120583119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
[119909 minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582119895120572
2ℎ2
0
+
1199060120572
2
) 119905]
(48)
where 120582119895is a nonzero constant and 0 lt 119895 le 2119873
According to (19) we have
120575119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
tanh120583119895minus 119903119895
1 minus 119903119895tanh120583
119895
(49)
where 119903119895(0 lt 119895 le 2119873) are nonzero constants
Using the Cramer rule to solve the linear algebraic system(18) we obtain
119860119873minus1
=
Δ119860119873minus1
Δ
(50)
where
Δ =
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ119860119873minus1
=
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(51)
6 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
0
5
0
250
100
150
u
x
tminus5
minus2
(a) 03 lt ℎ0lt 05 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10
0
1000
2000
u
x
t
minus1000
minus5
minus05
minus10
(b) 02 lt ℎ0lt 03 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
Figure 1 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for fixed parameters 1198880= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1 120582
2= minus02
1199031= minus80 1199032 = 20 and 119886 = 01
0
5
00
05
100
5000
u
x
t
minus5000
minus5
minus10
minus05
(a) 0 lt ℎ0lt 02 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10u
x
tminus5
minus10
minus05
minus110
minus111
minus112
(b) ℎ0gt 1 120582
1gt 0 120582
2gt 0
Figure 2 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for parameters (a) ℎ0= 015 119888
0= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1
1205822= minus02 119903
1= minus80 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = 01 (b) ℎ
0= 3 1198880= minus15 120572 = 02 120582
1= 1 120582
2= 02 119903
1= 8 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = minus2
As examples we will investigate exact solutions of (1) intwo simple cases119873 = 1 and119873 = 2 When119873 = 1 solving thelinear algebraic system (18) leads to
1198600=
12057511205822minus 12057521205821
1205752minus 1205751
(52)
Substituting (49) and (52) into (24) a singular double-solitonsolution of (1) is obtained as follows
119906 [1] =
6
ℎ2
0119891
[radicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
1205822
minus radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
1205821]
(53)
where
119891 = radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
minusradicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
(54)
By using program of computer it is easy to verify that thesolution (53) satisfies (1) and this shows that the Darbouxtransformation (24) which we obtained is correct In orderto show the properties of the above singular double-solitonsolutions visually as an example we plot the 3-D graphs ofsolution (53) for some fixed parameters which are shown inFigures 1 and 2
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2
u
x
minus1
Figure 3 The 2-D graph of profile of the exact soliton solution (57)for fixed parameters
When 119873 = 2 using the Cramer rule to solve the linearalgebraic system (18) we obtain
1198601=
Δ1198601
Δ
(55)
with
Δ =
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751120582112057511205821
1 1205752120582212057521205822
1 1205753120582312057531205823
1 1205754120582412057541205824
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ1198601=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751minus1205822
112057511205821
1 1205752minus1205822
212057521205822
1 1205753minus1205822
312057531205823
1 1205754minus1205822
412057541205824
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(56)
where 120575119895(119895 = 1 2 3 4) are given by (49) From (24) an
explicit solution of (1) is obtained by the following
119906 [2] = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
1198601 (57)
where 1198601is given by (55) Equation (57) is a very complex
solution and it is not soliton solution In order to show theproperties of solution (57) under the fixed parameters 120582
1=
minus021205822= minus03120582
3= minus04120582
4= minus01 119886 = 0 119888
0= 15120572 = 12
ℎ0= 08 119903
1= minus02 119903
2= minus03 119903
3= minus04 119903
4= minus05 119905 = 01
we plot its 2-D profile which is shown in Figure 3
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural ScienceFoundation of China (no 11361023) the Natural Science
Foundation of Chongqing Normal University (no 13XLR20)the Scientific Foundation of Education of Yunnan Province(no 2012C199) and the Program Foundation of ChongqingInnovation Team Project in University under Grant noKJTD201308
References
[1] J Li T Xu X Meng Y Zhang H Zhang and B Tian ldquoLaxpair Backlund transformation and N-soliton-like solution fora variable-coefficient Gardner equation from nonlinear latticeplasma physics and ocean dynamics with symbolic computa-tionrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol336 no 2 pp 1443ndash1455 2007
[2] A U Khawaja ldquoA comparative analysis of Painleve Lax pairand similarity transformationmethods in obtaining the integra-bility conditions of nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 5 Article ID 007005JMP 2010
[3] Q X Qu B Tian K Sun and Y Jiang ldquoBacklund transfor-mation Lax pair and solutions for the Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbonequationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no 1 ArticleID 013511 2011
[4] J Lin B Ren H Li and Y Li ldquoSoliton solutions for twononlinear partial differential equations using a Darboux trans-formation of the Lax pairsrdquo Physical Review E vol 77 no 3Article ID 036605 2008
[5] P Wang B Tian W Liu Q Qu M Li and K Sun ldquoLaxpair conservation laws andN-soliton solutions for the extendedKorteweg-de Vries equations in fluidsrdquo European Physical Jour-nal D vol 61 no 3 pp 701ndash708 2011
[6] Y Jiang B Tian W Liu M Li P Wang and K SunldquoSolitons Backlund transformation and Lax pair for the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Pempinelli equation for the waterwavesrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 51 no 9 ArticleID 093519 2010
[7] H Zhi ldquoSymmetry reductions of the Lax pair for the 2 +1-dimensional Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky equationrdquo AppliedMathematics and Computation vol 210 no 2 pp 530ndash5352009
[8] E Fan and K W Chow ldquoDarboux covariant Lax pairs andinfinite conservation laws of the (2+1)-dimensional breakingsoliton equationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no2 Article ID 023504 2011
[9] H Q Zhang B Tian T Xu H Li C Zhang and H ZhangldquoLax pair and Darboux transformation for multi-componentmodified Korteweg-de Vries equationsrdquo Journal of Physics Avol 41 no 35 Article ID 355210 2008
[10] X Lu B Tian K Sun and P Wang ldquoBell-polynomial manip-ulations on the Backlund transformations and Lax pairs forsome soliton equations with one Tau-functionrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 11 Article ID 113506 2010
[11] A S Fokas ldquoLax pairs a novel type of separabilityrdquo InverseProblems vol 25 no 12 Article ID 123007 2009
[12] E Fan ldquoNew bilinear Backlund transformation and Lax pairfor the supersymmetric two-Boson equationrdquo Studies in AppliedMathematics vol 127 no 3 pp 284ndash301 2011
[13] S F Tian and H Q Zhang ldquoLax pair binary darbouxtransformation and new grammian solutions of nonisospec-tral kadomtsevpetviashvili equation with the two-singular-manifold methodrdquo Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physicsvol 17 no 4 pp 491ndash502 2010
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[14] X Lu B Tian H Q Zhang T Xu and H Li ldquoGener-alized (2+1)-dimensional Gardner model bilinear equationsBacklund transformation Lax representation and interactionmechanismsrdquoNonlinearDynamics vol 67 no 3 pp 2279ndash22902012
[15] X L Gai Y T Gao L Wang et al ldquoPainleve property Laxpair and Darboux transformation of the variable-coefficientmodified Kortweg-de Vries model in fluid-filled elastic tubesrdquoCommunications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simula-tion vol 16 no 4 pp 1776ndash1782 2011
[16] J Avan and A Doikou ldquoBoundary Lax pairs for the An(1) Todafield theoriesrdquo Nuclear Physics B vol 821 no 3 pp 481ndash5052009
[17] Y He and H W Tam ldquoBilinear Backlund transformationand Lax pair for a coupled Ramani equationrdquo Journal ofMathematical Analysis and Applications vol 357 no 1 pp 132ndash136 2009
[18] H Q Zhang B Tian X H Meng X Lu and W Liu ldquoConser-vation laws soliton solutions and modulational instability forthe higher-order dispersive nonlinear Schrodinger equationrdquoEuropean Physical Journal B vol 72 no 2 pp 233ndash239 2009
[19] X Yu Y T Gao Z Y Sun and Y Liu ldquoWronskian solutionsand integrability for a generalized variable-coefficient forcedKorteweg-de Vries equation in fluidsrdquoNonlinear Dynamics vol67 no 2 pp 1023ndash1030 2012
[20] HQ Zhang B Tian L L Li andY Xue ldquoDarboux transforma-tion and soliton solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinearSchrodinger hierarchy with symbolic computationrdquo Physica Avol 388 no 1 pp 9ndash20 2009
[21] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[22] V B Matveev and M A Salle ldquoScattering of solitons inthe formalism of the Darboux transformrdquo Journal of SovietMathematics vol 34 no 5 pp 1983ndash1987 1986
[23] X Geng and H W Tam ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquoJournal of the Physical Society of Japan vol 68 no 5 pp 1508ndash1512 1999
[24] Y Li W X Ma and J E Zhang ldquoDarboux transformationsof classical Boussinesq system and its new solutionsrdquo PhysicsLetters A vol 275 no 1-2 pp 60ndash66 2000
[25] X Li and A Chen ldquoDarboux transformation and multi-solitonsolutions of Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquo Physics Letters Avol 342 no 5-6 pp 413ndash420 2005
[26] A Chen and X Li ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquoChaos Solitons andFractals vol 27 no 1 pp 43ndash49 2006
[27] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[28] Z B Zhaqilao and Z Li ldquoDarboux transformation and bidi-rectional soliton solutions of a new (2 + 1)-dimensional solitonequationrdquo Physics Letters A vol 372 no 9 pp 1422ndash1428 2008
[29] H X Yang ldquoSoliton solutions by Darboux transformation for aHamiltonian lattice systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 373 no 7 pp741ndash748 2009
[30] X Wu W Rui and X Hong ldquoA new discrete integrable systemderived from a generalized Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy and itsDarboux transformationrdquo Discrete Dynamics in Nature andSociety vol 2012 Article ID 652076 19 pages 2012
[31] W XMa ldquoDarboux transformations for a lax integrable systemin 2n dimensionsrdquo Letters in Mathematical Physics vol 39 no1 pp 33ndash49 1997
[32] W X Ma ldquoThe algebraic structure of zero curvature repre-sentations and application to coupled KdV systemsrdquo Journal ofPhysics A vol 26 no 11 pp 2573ndash2582 1993
[33] R Camassa and D D Holm ldquoAn integrable shallow waterequation with peaked solitonsrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 71no 11 pp 1661ndash1664 1993
[34] G B Whitham Linear and Nonlinear Waves Wiley New YorkNY USA 1974
[35] B Fuchssteiner and A S Fokas ldquoSymplectic structures theirBacklund transformations and hereditary symmetriesrdquo PhysicaD vol 4 no 1 pp 47ndash66 1981
[36] B Fuchssteiner ldquoThe Lie algebra structure of nonlinear evolu-tion equations admitting infinite dimensional abelian symme-try groupsrdquoProgress ofTheoretical Physics vol 65 no 3 pp 861ndash876 1981
[37] A S Fokas and P M Santini ldquoAn inverse acoustic problem andlinearization of moderate amplitude dispersive wavesrdquo 1994
[38] A S Fokas ldquoOn a class of physically important integrableequationsrdquo Physica D vol 87 no 1ndash4 pp 145ndash150 1995
[39] Q Bi ldquoWave patterns associated with a singular line for a bi-Hamiltonian systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 369 no 5-6 pp407ndash417 2007
[40] J Li and J Zhang ldquoBifurcations of travelling wave solutions forthe generalization form of the modified KdV equationrdquo ChaosSolitons and Fractals vol 21 no 4 pp 899ndash913 2004
[41] W Rui B He Y Long and C Chen ldquoThe integral bifurcationmethod and its application for solving a family of third-orderdispersive PDEsrdquo Nonlinear Analysis Theory Methods andApplications vol 69 no 4 pp 1256ndash1267 2008
[42] W Rui C Chen X Yang and Y Long ldquoSome new soliton-like solutions and periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop to a generalized KdV equationrdquo Applied Mathematics andComputation vol 217 no 4 pp 1666ndash1677 2010
[43] Y Long and C Chen ldquoExistence analysis of traveling wavesolutions for a generalization of KdV equationrdquo MathematicalProblems in Engineering vol 2013 Article ID 462957 7 pages2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
which comes from physical considerations via the method-ology introduced by Fuchssteiner and Fokas in [35 36] TheLax pairs of (3) with 120574 = 1 are given by [37 38] as follows
Ψ119909119909= [1198962(1 minus V) +
V
4]]Ψ = 0 120590V = 119906 + ]119906
119909119909
120590 =
120573 minus ]
2]
(4)
Ψ119905+ (minus
1
2
+ 119888)Ψ + (119906 +
120573
]+
2120590
4]1198962 minus 1)Ψ119909= 0 (5)
where 119888 is an arbitrary constant It is a pity that the [37] is not aformal publication and it is only preprint paper so we cannotknow its reality contents whether the authors have obtainedsoliton solutions of (3) by the Lax pairs (4) and (5) In fact(3) has been studied by many authors in recent years see thefollowing brief introductions
In [39] by using the bifurcation theory of dynamicsystem some subsection-function and implicit function solu-tions such as compactons solitary waves smooth periodicwaves and nonsmooth periodic waves with peaks as well asthe existence conditions have been presented by Bi By usingthe same method Li and Zhang [40] studied a generalizationform of the modified KdV equation which is more complexthan (3) In [40] the existence of solitary wave kink andantikink wave solutions and uncountably many smooth andnonsmooth periodic wave solutions are discussed By usingthe improved method named integral bifurcation method[41] Rui et al [42] obtain all kinds of soliton-like or kink-likewave solutions periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop smooth compacton-like periodic wave solutions and
nonsmooth periodic cusp wave solutions for (3) In [43]Long and Chen discussed the existence of solitary wave cuspwave periodic wave periodic cusp wave and compactonswere for (3) From the above references (1) (ie (3)) is a veryimportant water wave model
The rest of this paper is organized as follows In Section 2we will derive new Lax pair and Darboux transformationof (1) In Section 3 by using this Darboux transformationwe will investigate soliton solutions of (1) and discuss thedynamic properties of these soliton solutions
2 Lax Pair and Darboux Transformation of (1)Through a series of tedious computation we obtain Lax pairsof (1) as follows
120601119909119909= (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)120601 (6)
120601119905= minus(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)120601119909+
120572
4
119906119909120601 (7)
Obviously the Lax pairs (6) and (7) are different from theLax pairs (4) and (5) under 119888
0= 1 ] = minus(13)ℎ
2
0 120574 =
(32)120572 120573 = minus(16)ℎ2
01198880 They are new Lax pairs which we
obtained By using the new Lax pairs (6) and (7) we willconstruct a Darboux transformation for obtaining solitonsolutions of (1)
First we consider the following spectral problems
120601119909= M120601 120601
119905= N120601 (8)
with
M = (
0 1
minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
0
)
N = (
120572
4
119906119909
minus(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)(minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
) minus
120572
4
119906119909
)
(9)
where 120572 is a constant 120582 is a spectral parameter and 119906 is apotential function From compatibility condition 120601
119909119909119905= 120601119905119909119909
yields a zero curvature equation M119905minus N119909+ [MN] = O
Substituting M N into the zero curvature equation by adirect calculation (1) is obtained successfully
Next we will construct a Darboux Transformation (DT)of the spectral problems (8) In fact the DT is actually a gaugetransformation
120601 = T120601 (10)
of the spectral problems (8) It is required that 120601 also satisfiesthe same form of spectral problems
120601119909= M120601 M = (T
119909+ TM)Tminus1 (11)
120601119905= N120601 N = (T
119905+ TN)Tminus1 (12)
It means that we have to find a matrix T such that the oldpotential 119906 is replaced by the new one 119906
Suppose
T = T (120582) = (119860 (120582) 119861 (120582)119862 (120582) 119863 (120582)
) (13)
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 3
where
119860 (120582) = 119860119873(120582119873+
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119860119896120582119896)
119861 (120582) = 119860119873(
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119861119896120582119896)
(14)
119862 (120582) =
1
119860119873
(
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119862119896120582119896)
119863 (120582) =
1
119860119873
(120582119873+
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119863119896120582119896)
(15)
and 119860119873 119860119896 119861119896 119862119896 and 119863
119896(0 le 119896 le 119873 minus 1) are functions
of 119909 and 119905Let 120601(120582
119895) = (120601
1(120582119895) 1206012(120582119895))119879 120595(120582119895) = (120595
1(120582119895) 1205952(120582119895))119879
be two basic solutions of (8) From (10) there exist constants119903119895(0 le 119895 le 119873 minus 1) which satisfy
(119860 (120582119895) 1206011(120582119895) + 119861 (120582
119895) 1206012(120582119895))
minus 119903119895(119860 (120582
119895) 1205951(120582119895) + 119861 (120582
119895) 1205952(120582119895)) = 0
(119862 (120582119895) 1206011(120582119895) + 119863 (120582
119895) 1206012(120582119895))
minus 119903119895(119862 (120582
119895) 1205951(120582119895) + 119863 (120582
119895) 1205952(120582119895)) = 0
(16)
Further (16) can be written as a linear algebraic system
119860(120582119895) + 120575119895119861 (120582119895) = 0 119862 (120582
119895) + 120575119895119863(120582119895) = 0 (17)
That is119873minus1
sum
119896=0
(119860119896+ 120575119895119861119896) 120582119896
119895=minus120582119873
119895
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
(119862119896+ 120575119895119863119896) 120582119896
119895=minus120575119895120582119873
119895
(18)
where
120575119895=
1206012(120582119895) minus 1199031198951205952(120582119895)
1206011(120582119895) minus 1199031198951205951(120582119895)
1 le 119895 le 2119873 (19)
and the constants 120582119895(120582119896= 120582119904as 119896 = 119904) 119903
119895are suitably chosen
such that determinant of coefficients for (18) is nonzeroTherefore 119860
119873 119860119896 119861119896 119862119896 and 119863
119896(0 le 119896 le 119873 minus 1) are
uniquely determined by (18)Equations (14) and (15) show that the detT(120582) is a 2119873th-
order polynomial in 120582 and
detT (120582119895) = 119860 (120582
119895)119863 (120582
119895) minus 119861 (120582
119895) 119862 (120582
119895) (20)
On the other hand from (17) we have 119860(120582119895) = minus120575
119895119861(120582119895)
119862(120582119895) = minus120575
119895119863(120582119895) Thus we have
detT (120582) = 1205732119873minus1
prod
119895=1
(120582 minus 120582119895) (21)
where 120573 is independent of 120582 Equation (21) implies that120582119895(1 le 119895 le 2119873) are 2119873 roots of detT(120582)Second we prove the following theory of Darboux trans-
formation for special variable
Theorem 1 Let 119860119873satisfy
1198602
119873= 1 (22)
Then the matrixM determined by (11) has the same form asMthat is
M = (
0 1
minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
0
) (23)
where the transformation from the old potential 119906 into new one119906 is given by
119906 = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
(24)
119860119873minus1119909
= 119862119873minus1
minus
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
119861119873minus1119909
= 119863119873minus1
minus 119860119873minus1
119862119873minus1119909
=
3
4ℎ2
0
(119860119873minus1
minus 119863119873minus1
) +
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
119863119873minus1119909
=
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
minus 119862119873minus1
(25)
Proof Let Tminus1 = Tlowast detT and
(T119909+ TM)Tlowast = (11989111 (120582) 11989112 (120582)
11989121(120582) 119891
22(120582)) (26)
It is easy to see that 11989111(120582) and 119891
22(120582) are 2119873th-order
polynomials in 120582 11989112(120582) and 119891
21(120582) are (2119873 minus 1)th-order
polynomials in 120582 From (19) and (8) we find
120575119895119909= minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
minus 1205752
119895 (27)
Through direct calculation all 120582119895(0 le 119895 le 2119873) are roots of
119891119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) Together with (21) and (26) we get
(T119909+ TM)Tlowast = (detT) 119875 (120582) (28)
with
119875 (120582) = (
119901(0)
11119901(0)
12
119901(0)
21119901(0)
22
) (29)
where 119901(0)119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) are independent of spectral parameter
120582 Indeed (28) can be written as
T119909+ TM = 119875 (120582)T (30)
4 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Comparing the coefficients of 120582119873 in (30) we find
119901(0)
11= minus119901(0)
22= 120597119909ln119860119873 119901
(0)
12= 1198602
119873
119901(0)
21=
1
1198602
119873
3
4ℎ2
0
(31)
Substituting (22) into (31) yields
119901(0)
11= minus119901(0)
22= 0 119901
(0)
12= 1198602
119873= 1 (32)
From (22) (24) (25) and (31) and noticing 119906 in (23) we get
119901(0)
21= minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
(33)
Thus 119875(120582) = M The proof of Theorem 1 is completed
Finally by using same way toTheorem 1 we prove thatNin (12) has the same form asN under the transformation (10)and (24) see the following theory and its proof
Theorem 2 ThematrixN defined by (12) has the same type asN in which the old potential 119906 is mapped into 119906 via the sameDT (24)
Proof Let Tminus1 = Tlowast detT and
(T119905+ TN)Tlowast = (11989211 (120582) 11989212 (120582)
11989221(120582) 119892
22(120582)) (34)
It is easy to see that 11989211(120582) and 119892
22(120582) are 2119873th-order
polynomials in 120582 11989212(120582) and 119892
21(120582) are (2119873 + 1)th-order
polynomials in 120582 By using (19) and (8) we obtain
120575119895119905=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times(minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
minus
120572
2
119906119909120575119895+ (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)1205752
119895
(35)
Through direct calculation all 120582119895(0 le 119895 le 2119873) are roots of
119892119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) Together with (21) and (34) we get
(T119905+ TN)Tlowast = (detT) 119876 (120582) (36)
with
119876 (120582) = (
119902(0)
11119902(1)
12120582 + 119902(0)
12
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21119902(0)
22
) (37)
where 119902(119897)119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2 119897 = 0 1) are independent of spectral
parameter 120582 Equation (37) can be written as
T119905+ TN = 119876 (120582)T (38)
Comparing the coefficients of 120582119873+1 and 120582119873 in (38) leadsto
119902(1)
12= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873 119902
(1)
21= minus
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
(39)
119902(0)
11= 120597119905ln119860119873+
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
(40)
119902(0)
12= minus(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)1198602
119873minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873119860119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873119863119873minus1
(41)
119902(0)
21=
1
1198602
119873
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
1
1198602
119873
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)minus
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
+
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
)
+
119860119873minus1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
(42)
119902(0)
22= minus120597119905ln119860119873minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
minus
120572
4
119906119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
(43)
Substituting (22) (24) and (25) into (40) to (43) we canget
119902(0)
11=
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909
=
120572
4
119906119909
119902(1)
12120582 + 119902(0)
12
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
120582 minus (
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906) minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
120582 minus (
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906) minus
3120572
ℎ2
0
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(119860119873minus1
+ 119863119873minus1
)
= minus(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
119902(0)
22= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
minus
120572
4
119906119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
= minus
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909
= minus
120572
4
119906119909
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 5
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
120582+
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(44)
On the other hand from (24) (25) and (33) we have
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
=
120572
4
119906119909119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909119909
minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
6120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(45)
From (44) and (45) obviously we have
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
(46)
Thus 119876(120582) = N and this completes the proof of Theorem 2
3 Exact Soliton Solution of (1) andIts Dynamic Properties
In this section we will construct the explicit solutions ofthe integrable shallow water wave (1) by using the Darbouxtransformation (24)
Choosing 119906 = 1199060(1199060is an arbitrary constant) as a seed
solution of (1) and substituting 119906 = 1199060into the spectral
problems (8) Then we get two basic solutions of (8) asfollows
120601 (120582119895) = (
cosh 120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
sinh120583119895
)
120595 (120582119895) = (
sinh120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
cosh 120583119895
)
(47)
with
120583119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
[119909 minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582119895120572
2ℎ2
0
+
1199060120572
2
) 119905]
(48)
where 120582119895is a nonzero constant and 0 lt 119895 le 2119873
According to (19) we have
120575119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
tanh120583119895minus 119903119895
1 minus 119903119895tanh120583
119895
(49)
where 119903119895(0 lt 119895 le 2119873) are nonzero constants
Using the Cramer rule to solve the linear algebraic system(18) we obtain
119860119873minus1
=
Δ119860119873minus1
Δ
(50)
where
Δ =
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ119860119873minus1
=
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(51)
6 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
0
5
0
250
100
150
u
x
tminus5
minus2
(a) 03 lt ℎ0lt 05 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10
0
1000
2000
u
x
t
minus1000
minus5
minus05
minus10
(b) 02 lt ℎ0lt 03 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
Figure 1 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for fixed parameters 1198880= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1 120582
2= minus02
1199031= minus80 1199032 = 20 and 119886 = 01
0
5
00
05
100
5000
u
x
t
minus5000
minus5
minus10
minus05
(a) 0 lt ℎ0lt 02 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10u
x
tminus5
minus10
minus05
minus110
minus111
minus112
(b) ℎ0gt 1 120582
1gt 0 120582
2gt 0
Figure 2 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for parameters (a) ℎ0= 015 119888
0= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1
1205822= minus02 119903
1= minus80 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = 01 (b) ℎ
0= 3 1198880= minus15 120572 = 02 120582
1= 1 120582
2= 02 119903
1= 8 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = minus2
As examples we will investigate exact solutions of (1) intwo simple cases119873 = 1 and119873 = 2 When119873 = 1 solving thelinear algebraic system (18) leads to
1198600=
12057511205822minus 12057521205821
1205752minus 1205751
(52)
Substituting (49) and (52) into (24) a singular double-solitonsolution of (1) is obtained as follows
119906 [1] =
6
ℎ2
0119891
[radicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
1205822
minus radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
1205821]
(53)
where
119891 = radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
minusradicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
(54)
By using program of computer it is easy to verify that thesolution (53) satisfies (1) and this shows that the Darbouxtransformation (24) which we obtained is correct In orderto show the properties of the above singular double-solitonsolutions visually as an example we plot the 3-D graphs ofsolution (53) for some fixed parameters which are shown inFigures 1 and 2
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2
u
x
minus1
Figure 3 The 2-D graph of profile of the exact soliton solution (57)for fixed parameters
When 119873 = 2 using the Cramer rule to solve the linearalgebraic system (18) we obtain
1198601=
Δ1198601
Δ
(55)
with
Δ =
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751120582112057511205821
1 1205752120582212057521205822
1 1205753120582312057531205823
1 1205754120582412057541205824
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ1198601=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751minus1205822
112057511205821
1 1205752minus1205822
212057521205822
1 1205753minus1205822
312057531205823
1 1205754minus1205822
412057541205824
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(56)
where 120575119895(119895 = 1 2 3 4) are given by (49) From (24) an
explicit solution of (1) is obtained by the following
119906 [2] = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
1198601 (57)
where 1198601is given by (55) Equation (57) is a very complex
solution and it is not soliton solution In order to show theproperties of solution (57) under the fixed parameters 120582
1=
minus021205822= minus03120582
3= minus04120582
4= minus01 119886 = 0 119888
0= 15120572 = 12
ℎ0= 08 119903
1= minus02 119903
2= minus03 119903
3= minus04 119903
4= minus05 119905 = 01
we plot its 2-D profile which is shown in Figure 3
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural ScienceFoundation of China (no 11361023) the Natural Science
Foundation of Chongqing Normal University (no 13XLR20)the Scientific Foundation of Education of Yunnan Province(no 2012C199) and the Program Foundation of ChongqingInnovation Team Project in University under Grant noKJTD201308
References
[1] J Li T Xu X Meng Y Zhang H Zhang and B Tian ldquoLaxpair Backlund transformation and N-soliton-like solution fora variable-coefficient Gardner equation from nonlinear latticeplasma physics and ocean dynamics with symbolic computa-tionrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol336 no 2 pp 1443ndash1455 2007
[2] A U Khawaja ldquoA comparative analysis of Painleve Lax pairand similarity transformationmethods in obtaining the integra-bility conditions of nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 5 Article ID 007005JMP 2010
[3] Q X Qu B Tian K Sun and Y Jiang ldquoBacklund transfor-mation Lax pair and solutions for the Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbonequationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no 1 ArticleID 013511 2011
[4] J Lin B Ren H Li and Y Li ldquoSoliton solutions for twononlinear partial differential equations using a Darboux trans-formation of the Lax pairsrdquo Physical Review E vol 77 no 3Article ID 036605 2008
[5] P Wang B Tian W Liu Q Qu M Li and K Sun ldquoLaxpair conservation laws andN-soliton solutions for the extendedKorteweg-de Vries equations in fluidsrdquo European Physical Jour-nal D vol 61 no 3 pp 701ndash708 2011
[6] Y Jiang B Tian W Liu M Li P Wang and K SunldquoSolitons Backlund transformation and Lax pair for the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Pempinelli equation for the waterwavesrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 51 no 9 ArticleID 093519 2010
[7] H Zhi ldquoSymmetry reductions of the Lax pair for the 2 +1-dimensional Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky equationrdquo AppliedMathematics and Computation vol 210 no 2 pp 530ndash5352009
[8] E Fan and K W Chow ldquoDarboux covariant Lax pairs andinfinite conservation laws of the (2+1)-dimensional breakingsoliton equationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no2 Article ID 023504 2011
[9] H Q Zhang B Tian T Xu H Li C Zhang and H ZhangldquoLax pair and Darboux transformation for multi-componentmodified Korteweg-de Vries equationsrdquo Journal of Physics Avol 41 no 35 Article ID 355210 2008
[10] X Lu B Tian K Sun and P Wang ldquoBell-polynomial manip-ulations on the Backlund transformations and Lax pairs forsome soliton equations with one Tau-functionrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 11 Article ID 113506 2010
[11] A S Fokas ldquoLax pairs a novel type of separabilityrdquo InverseProblems vol 25 no 12 Article ID 123007 2009
[12] E Fan ldquoNew bilinear Backlund transformation and Lax pairfor the supersymmetric two-Boson equationrdquo Studies in AppliedMathematics vol 127 no 3 pp 284ndash301 2011
[13] S F Tian and H Q Zhang ldquoLax pair binary darbouxtransformation and new grammian solutions of nonisospec-tral kadomtsevpetviashvili equation with the two-singular-manifold methodrdquo Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physicsvol 17 no 4 pp 491ndash502 2010
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[14] X Lu B Tian H Q Zhang T Xu and H Li ldquoGener-alized (2+1)-dimensional Gardner model bilinear equationsBacklund transformation Lax representation and interactionmechanismsrdquoNonlinearDynamics vol 67 no 3 pp 2279ndash22902012
[15] X L Gai Y T Gao L Wang et al ldquoPainleve property Laxpair and Darboux transformation of the variable-coefficientmodified Kortweg-de Vries model in fluid-filled elastic tubesrdquoCommunications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simula-tion vol 16 no 4 pp 1776ndash1782 2011
[16] J Avan and A Doikou ldquoBoundary Lax pairs for the An(1) Todafield theoriesrdquo Nuclear Physics B vol 821 no 3 pp 481ndash5052009
[17] Y He and H W Tam ldquoBilinear Backlund transformationand Lax pair for a coupled Ramani equationrdquo Journal ofMathematical Analysis and Applications vol 357 no 1 pp 132ndash136 2009
[18] H Q Zhang B Tian X H Meng X Lu and W Liu ldquoConser-vation laws soliton solutions and modulational instability forthe higher-order dispersive nonlinear Schrodinger equationrdquoEuropean Physical Journal B vol 72 no 2 pp 233ndash239 2009
[19] X Yu Y T Gao Z Y Sun and Y Liu ldquoWronskian solutionsand integrability for a generalized variable-coefficient forcedKorteweg-de Vries equation in fluidsrdquoNonlinear Dynamics vol67 no 2 pp 1023ndash1030 2012
[20] HQ Zhang B Tian L L Li andY Xue ldquoDarboux transforma-tion and soliton solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinearSchrodinger hierarchy with symbolic computationrdquo Physica Avol 388 no 1 pp 9ndash20 2009
[21] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[22] V B Matveev and M A Salle ldquoScattering of solitons inthe formalism of the Darboux transformrdquo Journal of SovietMathematics vol 34 no 5 pp 1983ndash1987 1986
[23] X Geng and H W Tam ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquoJournal of the Physical Society of Japan vol 68 no 5 pp 1508ndash1512 1999
[24] Y Li W X Ma and J E Zhang ldquoDarboux transformationsof classical Boussinesq system and its new solutionsrdquo PhysicsLetters A vol 275 no 1-2 pp 60ndash66 2000
[25] X Li and A Chen ldquoDarboux transformation and multi-solitonsolutions of Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquo Physics Letters Avol 342 no 5-6 pp 413ndash420 2005
[26] A Chen and X Li ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquoChaos Solitons andFractals vol 27 no 1 pp 43ndash49 2006
[27] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[28] Z B Zhaqilao and Z Li ldquoDarboux transformation and bidi-rectional soliton solutions of a new (2 + 1)-dimensional solitonequationrdquo Physics Letters A vol 372 no 9 pp 1422ndash1428 2008
[29] H X Yang ldquoSoliton solutions by Darboux transformation for aHamiltonian lattice systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 373 no 7 pp741ndash748 2009
[30] X Wu W Rui and X Hong ldquoA new discrete integrable systemderived from a generalized Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy and itsDarboux transformationrdquo Discrete Dynamics in Nature andSociety vol 2012 Article ID 652076 19 pages 2012
[31] W XMa ldquoDarboux transformations for a lax integrable systemin 2n dimensionsrdquo Letters in Mathematical Physics vol 39 no1 pp 33ndash49 1997
[32] W X Ma ldquoThe algebraic structure of zero curvature repre-sentations and application to coupled KdV systemsrdquo Journal ofPhysics A vol 26 no 11 pp 2573ndash2582 1993
[33] R Camassa and D D Holm ldquoAn integrable shallow waterequation with peaked solitonsrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 71no 11 pp 1661ndash1664 1993
[34] G B Whitham Linear and Nonlinear Waves Wiley New YorkNY USA 1974
[35] B Fuchssteiner and A S Fokas ldquoSymplectic structures theirBacklund transformations and hereditary symmetriesrdquo PhysicaD vol 4 no 1 pp 47ndash66 1981
[36] B Fuchssteiner ldquoThe Lie algebra structure of nonlinear evolu-tion equations admitting infinite dimensional abelian symme-try groupsrdquoProgress ofTheoretical Physics vol 65 no 3 pp 861ndash876 1981
[37] A S Fokas and P M Santini ldquoAn inverse acoustic problem andlinearization of moderate amplitude dispersive wavesrdquo 1994
[38] A S Fokas ldquoOn a class of physically important integrableequationsrdquo Physica D vol 87 no 1ndash4 pp 145ndash150 1995
[39] Q Bi ldquoWave patterns associated with a singular line for a bi-Hamiltonian systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 369 no 5-6 pp407ndash417 2007
[40] J Li and J Zhang ldquoBifurcations of travelling wave solutions forthe generalization form of the modified KdV equationrdquo ChaosSolitons and Fractals vol 21 no 4 pp 899ndash913 2004
[41] W Rui B He Y Long and C Chen ldquoThe integral bifurcationmethod and its application for solving a family of third-orderdispersive PDEsrdquo Nonlinear Analysis Theory Methods andApplications vol 69 no 4 pp 1256ndash1267 2008
[42] W Rui C Chen X Yang and Y Long ldquoSome new soliton-like solutions and periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop to a generalized KdV equationrdquo Applied Mathematics andComputation vol 217 no 4 pp 1666ndash1677 2010
[43] Y Long and C Chen ldquoExistence analysis of traveling wavesolutions for a generalization of KdV equationrdquo MathematicalProblems in Engineering vol 2013 Article ID 462957 7 pages2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 3
where
119860 (120582) = 119860119873(120582119873+
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119860119896120582119896)
119861 (120582) = 119860119873(
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119861119896120582119896)
(14)
119862 (120582) =
1
119860119873
(
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119862119896120582119896)
119863 (120582) =
1
119860119873
(120582119873+
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
119863119896120582119896)
(15)
and 119860119873 119860119896 119861119896 119862119896 and 119863
119896(0 le 119896 le 119873 minus 1) are functions
of 119909 and 119905Let 120601(120582
119895) = (120601
1(120582119895) 1206012(120582119895))119879 120595(120582119895) = (120595
1(120582119895) 1205952(120582119895))119879
be two basic solutions of (8) From (10) there exist constants119903119895(0 le 119895 le 119873 minus 1) which satisfy
(119860 (120582119895) 1206011(120582119895) + 119861 (120582
119895) 1206012(120582119895))
minus 119903119895(119860 (120582
119895) 1205951(120582119895) + 119861 (120582
119895) 1205952(120582119895)) = 0
(119862 (120582119895) 1206011(120582119895) + 119863 (120582
119895) 1206012(120582119895))
minus 119903119895(119862 (120582
119895) 1205951(120582119895) + 119863 (120582
119895) 1205952(120582119895)) = 0
(16)
Further (16) can be written as a linear algebraic system
119860(120582119895) + 120575119895119861 (120582119895) = 0 119862 (120582
119895) + 120575119895119863(120582119895) = 0 (17)
That is119873minus1
sum
119896=0
(119860119896+ 120575119895119861119896) 120582119896
119895=minus120582119873
119895
119873minus1
sum
119896=0
(119862119896+ 120575119895119863119896) 120582119896
119895=minus120575119895120582119873
119895
(18)
where
120575119895=
1206012(120582119895) minus 1199031198951205952(120582119895)
1206011(120582119895) minus 1199031198951205951(120582119895)
1 le 119895 le 2119873 (19)
and the constants 120582119895(120582119896= 120582119904as 119896 = 119904) 119903
119895are suitably chosen
such that determinant of coefficients for (18) is nonzeroTherefore 119860
119873 119860119896 119861119896 119862119896 and 119863
119896(0 le 119896 le 119873 minus 1) are
uniquely determined by (18)Equations (14) and (15) show that the detT(120582) is a 2119873th-
order polynomial in 120582 and
detT (120582119895) = 119860 (120582
119895)119863 (120582
119895) minus 119861 (120582
119895) 119862 (120582
119895) (20)
On the other hand from (17) we have 119860(120582119895) = minus120575
119895119861(120582119895)
119862(120582119895) = minus120575
119895119863(120582119895) Thus we have
detT (120582) = 1205732119873minus1
prod
119895=1
(120582 minus 120582119895) (21)
where 120573 is independent of 120582 Equation (21) implies that120582119895(1 le 119895 le 2119873) are 2119873 roots of detT(120582)Second we prove the following theory of Darboux trans-
formation for special variable
Theorem 1 Let 119860119873satisfy
1198602
119873= 1 (22)
Then the matrixM determined by (11) has the same form asMthat is
M = (
0 1
minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
0
) (23)
where the transformation from the old potential 119906 into new one119906 is given by
119906 = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
(24)
119860119873minus1119909
= 119862119873minus1
minus
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
119861119873minus1119909
= 119863119873minus1
minus 119860119873minus1
119862119873minus1119909
=
3
4ℎ2
0
(119860119873minus1
minus 119863119873minus1
) +
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
119863119873minus1119909
=
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
minus 119862119873minus1
(25)
Proof Let Tminus1 = Tlowast detT and
(T119909+ TM)Tlowast = (11989111 (120582) 11989112 (120582)
11989121(120582) 119891
22(120582)) (26)
It is easy to see that 11989111(120582) and 119891
22(120582) are 2119873th-order
polynomials in 120582 11989112(120582) and 119891
21(120582) are (2119873 minus 1)th-order
polynomials in 120582 From (19) and (8) we find
120575119895119909= minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
minus 1205752
119895 (27)
Through direct calculation all 120582119895(0 le 119895 le 2119873) are roots of
119891119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) Together with (21) and (26) we get
(T119909+ TM)Tlowast = (detT) 119875 (120582) (28)
with
119875 (120582) = (
119901(0)
11119901(0)
12
119901(0)
21119901(0)
22
) (29)
where 119901(0)119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) are independent of spectral parameter
120582 Indeed (28) can be written as
T119909+ TM = 119875 (120582)T (30)
4 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Comparing the coefficients of 120582119873 in (30) we find
119901(0)
11= minus119901(0)
22= 120597119909ln119860119873 119901
(0)
12= 1198602
119873
119901(0)
21=
1
1198602
119873
3
4ℎ2
0
(31)
Substituting (22) into (31) yields
119901(0)
11= minus119901(0)
22= 0 119901
(0)
12= 1198602
119873= 1 (32)
From (22) (24) (25) and (31) and noticing 119906 in (23) we get
119901(0)
21= minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
(33)
Thus 119875(120582) = M The proof of Theorem 1 is completed
Finally by using same way toTheorem 1 we prove thatNin (12) has the same form asN under the transformation (10)and (24) see the following theory and its proof
Theorem 2 ThematrixN defined by (12) has the same type asN in which the old potential 119906 is mapped into 119906 via the sameDT (24)
Proof Let Tminus1 = Tlowast detT and
(T119905+ TN)Tlowast = (11989211 (120582) 11989212 (120582)
11989221(120582) 119892
22(120582)) (34)
It is easy to see that 11989211(120582) and 119892
22(120582) are 2119873th-order
polynomials in 120582 11989212(120582) and 119892
21(120582) are (2119873 + 1)th-order
polynomials in 120582 By using (19) and (8) we obtain
120575119895119905=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times(minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
minus
120572
2
119906119909120575119895+ (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)1205752
119895
(35)
Through direct calculation all 120582119895(0 le 119895 le 2119873) are roots of
119892119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) Together with (21) and (34) we get
(T119905+ TN)Tlowast = (detT) 119876 (120582) (36)
with
119876 (120582) = (
119902(0)
11119902(1)
12120582 + 119902(0)
12
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21119902(0)
22
) (37)
where 119902(119897)119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2 119897 = 0 1) are independent of spectral
parameter 120582 Equation (37) can be written as
T119905+ TN = 119876 (120582)T (38)
Comparing the coefficients of 120582119873+1 and 120582119873 in (38) leadsto
119902(1)
12= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873 119902
(1)
21= minus
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
(39)
119902(0)
11= 120597119905ln119860119873+
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
(40)
119902(0)
12= minus(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)1198602
119873minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873119860119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873119863119873minus1
(41)
119902(0)
21=
1
1198602
119873
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
1
1198602
119873
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)minus
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
+
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
)
+
119860119873minus1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
(42)
119902(0)
22= minus120597119905ln119860119873minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
minus
120572
4
119906119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
(43)
Substituting (22) (24) and (25) into (40) to (43) we canget
119902(0)
11=
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909
=
120572
4
119906119909
119902(1)
12120582 + 119902(0)
12
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
120582 minus (
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906) minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
120582 minus (
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906) minus
3120572
ℎ2
0
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(119860119873minus1
+ 119863119873minus1
)
= minus(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
119902(0)
22= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
minus
120572
4
119906119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
= minus
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909
= minus
120572
4
119906119909
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 5
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
120582+
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(44)
On the other hand from (24) (25) and (33) we have
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
=
120572
4
119906119909119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909119909
minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
6120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(45)
From (44) and (45) obviously we have
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
(46)
Thus 119876(120582) = N and this completes the proof of Theorem 2
3 Exact Soliton Solution of (1) andIts Dynamic Properties
In this section we will construct the explicit solutions ofthe integrable shallow water wave (1) by using the Darbouxtransformation (24)
Choosing 119906 = 1199060(1199060is an arbitrary constant) as a seed
solution of (1) and substituting 119906 = 1199060into the spectral
problems (8) Then we get two basic solutions of (8) asfollows
120601 (120582119895) = (
cosh 120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
sinh120583119895
)
120595 (120582119895) = (
sinh120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
cosh 120583119895
)
(47)
with
120583119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
[119909 minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582119895120572
2ℎ2
0
+
1199060120572
2
) 119905]
(48)
where 120582119895is a nonzero constant and 0 lt 119895 le 2119873
According to (19) we have
120575119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
tanh120583119895minus 119903119895
1 minus 119903119895tanh120583
119895
(49)
where 119903119895(0 lt 119895 le 2119873) are nonzero constants
Using the Cramer rule to solve the linear algebraic system(18) we obtain
119860119873minus1
=
Δ119860119873minus1
Δ
(50)
where
Δ =
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ119860119873minus1
=
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(51)
6 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
0
5
0
250
100
150
u
x
tminus5
minus2
(a) 03 lt ℎ0lt 05 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10
0
1000
2000
u
x
t
minus1000
minus5
minus05
minus10
(b) 02 lt ℎ0lt 03 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
Figure 1 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for fixed parameters 1198880= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1 120582
2= minus02
1199031= minus80 1199032 = 20 and 119886 = 01
0
5
00
05
100
5000
u
x
t
minus5000
minus5
minus10
minus05
(a) 0 lt ℎ0lt 02 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10u
x
tminus5
minus10
minus05
minus110
minus111
minus112
(b) ℎ0gt 1 120582
1gt 0 120582
2gt 0
Figure 2 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for parameters (a) ℎ0= 015 119888
0= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1
1205822= minus02 119903
1= minus80 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = 01 (b) ℎ
0= 3 1198880= minus15 120572 = 02 120582
1= 1 120582
2= 02 119903
1= 8 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = minus2
As examples we will investigate exact solutions of (1) intwo simple cases119873 = 1 and119873 = 2 When119873 = 1 solving thelinear algebraic system (18) leads to
1198600=
12057511205822minus 12057521205821
1205752minus 1205751
(52)
Substituting (49) and (52) into (24) a singular double-solitonsolution of (1) is obtained as follows
119906 [1] =
6
ℎ2
0119891
[radicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
1205822
minus radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
1205821]
(53)
where
119891 = radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
minusradicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
(54)
By using program of computer it is easy to verify that thesolution (53) satisfies (1) and this shows that the Darbouxtransformation (24) which we obtained is correct In orderto show the properties of the above singular double-solitonsolutions visually as an example we plot the 3-D graphs ofsolution (53) for some fixed parameters which are shown inFigures 1 and 2
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2
u
x
minus1
Figure 3 The 2-D graph of profile of the exact soliton solution (57)for fixed parameters
When 119873 = 2 using the Cramer rule to solve the linearalgebraic system (18) we obtain
1198601=
Δ1198601
Δ
(55)
with
Δ =
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751120582112057511205821
1 1205752120582212057521205822
1 1205753120582312057531205823
1 1205754120582412057541205824
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ1198601=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751minus1205822
112057511205821
1 1205752minus1205822
212057521205822
1 1205753minus1205822
312057531205823
1 1205754minus1205822
412057541205824
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(56)
where 120575119895(119895 = 1 2 3 4) are given by (49) From (24) an
explicit solution of (1) is obtained by the following
119906 [2] = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
1198601 (57)
where 1198601is given by (55) Equation (57) is a very complex
solution and it is not soliton solution In order to show theproperties of solution (57) under the fixed parameters 120582
1=
minus021205822= minus03120582
3= minus04120582
4= minus01 119886 = 0 119888
0= 15120572 = 12
ℎ0= 08 119903
1= minus02 119903
2= minus03 119903
3= minus04 119903
4= minus05 119905 = 01
we plot its 2-D profile which is shown in Figure 3
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural ScienceFoundation of China (no 11361023) the Natural Science
Foundation of Chongqing Normal University (no 13XLR20)the Scientific Foundation of Education of Yunnan Province(no 2012C199) and the Program Foundation of ChongqingInnovation Team Project in University under Grant noKJTD201308
References
[1] J Li T Xu X Meng Y Zhang H Zhang and B Tian ldquoLaxpair Backlund transformation and N-soliton-like solution fora variable-coefficient Gardner equation from nonlinear latticeplasma physics and ocean dynamics with symbolic computa-tionrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol336 no 2 pp 1443ndash1455 2007
[2] A U Khawaja ldquoA comparative analysis of Painleve Lax pairand similarity transformationmethods in obtaining the integra-bility conditions of nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 5 Article ID 007005JMP 2010
[3] Q X Qu B Tian K Sun and Y Jiang ldquoBacklund transfor-mation Lax pair and solutions for the Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbonequationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no 1 ArticleID 013511 2011
[4] J Lin B Ren H Li and Y Li ldquoSoliton solutions for twononlinear partial differential equations using a Darboux trans-formation of the Lax pairsrdquo Physical Review E vol 77 no 3Article ID 036605 2008
[5] P Wang B Tian W Liu Q Qu M Li and K Sun ldquoLaxpair conservation laws andN-soliton solutions for the extendedKorteweg-de Vries equations in fluidsrdquo European Physical Jour-nal D vol 61 no 3 pp 701ndash708 2011
[6] Y Jiang B Tian W Liu M Li P Wang and K SunldquoSolitons Backlund transformation and Lax pair for the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Pempinelli equation for the waterwavesrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 51 no 9 ArticleID 093519 2010
[7] H Zhi ldquoSymmetry reductions of the Lax pair for the 2 +1-dimensional Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky equationrdquo AppliedMathematics and Computation vol 210 no 2 pp 530ndash5352009
[8] E Fan and K W Chow ldquoDarboux covariant Lax pairs andinfinite conservation laws of the (2+1)-dimensional breakingsoliton equationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no2 Article ID 023504 2011
[9] H Q Zhang B Tian T Xu H Li C Zhang and H ZhangldquoLax pair and Darboux transformation for multi-componentmodified Korteweg-de Vries equationsrdquo Journal of Physics Avol 41 no 35 Article ID 355210 2008
[10] X Lu B Tian K Sun and P Wang ldquoBell-polynomial manip-ulations on the Backlund transformations and Lax pairs forsome soliton equations with one Tau-functionrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 11 Article ID 113506 2010
[11] A S Fokas ldquoLax pairs a novel type of separabilityrdquo InverseProblems vol 25 no 12 Article ID 123007 2009
[12] E Fan ldquoNew bilinear Backlund transformation and Lax pairfor the supersymmetric two-Boson equationrdquo Studies in AppliedMathematics vol 127 no 3 pp 284ndash301 2011
[13] S F Tian and H Q Zhang ldquoLax pair binary darbouxtransformation and new grammian solutions of nonisospec-tral kadomtsevpetviashvili equation with the two-singular-manifold methodrdquo Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physicsvol 17 no 4 pp 491ndash502 2010
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[14] X Lu B Tian H Q Zhang T Xu and H Li ldquoGener-alized (2+1)-dimensional Gardner model bilinear equationsBacklund transformation Lax representation and interactionmechanismsrdquoNonlinearDynamics vol 67 no 3 pp 2279ndash22902012
[15] X L Gai Y T Gao L Wang et al ldquoPainleve property Laxpair and Darboux transformation of the variable-coefficientmodified Kortweg-de Vries model in fluid-filled elastic tubesrdquoCommunications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simula-tion vol 16 no 4 pp 1776ndash1782 2011
[16] J Avan and A Doikou ldquoBoundary Lax pairs for the An(1) Todafield theoriesrdquo Nuclear Physics B vol 821 no 3 pp 481ndash5052009
[17] Y He and H W Tam ldquoBilinear Backlund transformationand Lax pair for a coupled Ramani equationrdquo Journal ofMathematical Analysis and Applications vol 357 no 1 pp 132ndash136 2009
[18] H Q Zhang B Tian X H Meng X Lu and W Liu ldquoConser-vation laws soliton solutions and modulational instability forthe higher-order dispersive nonlinear Schrodinger equationrdquoEuropean Physical Journal B vol 72 no 2 pp 233ndash239 2009
[19] X Yu Y T Gao Z Y Sun and Y Liu ldquoWronskian solutionsand integrability for a generalized variable-coefficient forcedKorteweg-de Vries equation in fluidsrdquoNonlinear Dynamics vol67 no 2 pp 1023ndash1030 2012
[20] HQ Zhang B Tian L L Li andY Xue ldquoDarboux transforma-tion and soliton solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinearSchrodinger hierarchy with symbolic computationrdquo Physica Avol 388 no 1 pp 9ndash20 2009
[21] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[22] V B Matveev and M A Salle ldquoScattering of solitons inthe formalism of the Darboux transformrdquo Journal of SovietMathematics vol 34 no 5 pp 1983ndash1987 1986
[23] X Geng and H W Tam ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquoJournal of the Physical Society of Japan vol 68 no 5 pp 1508ndash1512 1999
[24] Y Li W X Ma and J E Zhang ldquoDarboux transformationsof classical Boussinesq system and its new solutionsrdquo PhysicsLetters A vol 275 no 1-2 pp 60ndash66 2000
[25] X Li and A Chen ldquoDarboux transformation and multi-solitonsolutions of Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquo Physics Letters Avol 342 no 5-6 pp 413ndash420 2005
[26] A Chen and X Li ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquoChaos Solitons andFractals vol 27 no 1 pp 43ndash49 2006
[27] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[28] Z B Zhaqilao and Z Li ldquoDarboux transformation and bidi-rectional soliton solutions of a new (2 + 1)-dimensional solitonequationrdquo Physics Letters A vol 372 no 9 pp 1422ndash1428 2008
[29] H X Yang ldquoSoliton solutions by Darboux transformation for aHamiltonian lattice systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 373 no 7 pp741ndash748 2009
[30] X Wu W Rui and X Hong ldquoA new discrete integrable systemderived from a generalized Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy and itsDarboux transformationrdquo Discrete Dynamics in Nature andSociety vol 2012 Article ID 652076 19 pages 2012
[31] W XMa ldquoDarboux transformations for a lax integrable systemin 2n dimensionsrdquo Letters in Mathematical Physics vol 39 no1 pp 33ndash49 1997
[32] W X Ma ldquoThe algebraic structure of zero curvature repre-sentations and application to coupled KdV systemsrdquo Journal ofPhysics A vol 26 no 11 pp 2573ndash2582 1993
[33] R Camassa and D D Holm ldquoAn integrable shallow waterequation with peaked solitonsrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 71no 11 pp 1661ndash1664 1993
[34] G B Whitham Linear and Nonlinear Waves Wiley New YorkNY USA 1974
[35] B Fuchssteiner and A S Fokas ldquoSymplectic structures theirBacklund transformations and hereditary symmetriesrdquo PhysicaD vol 4 no 1 pp 47ndash66 1981
[36] B Fuchssteiner ldquoThe Lie algebra structure of nonlinear evolu-tion equations admitting infinite dimensional abelian symme-try groupsrdquoProgress ofTheoretical Physics vol 65 no 3 pp 861ndash876 1981
[37] A S Fokas and P M Santini ldquoAn inverse acoustic problem andlinearization of moderate amplitude dispersive wavesrdquo 1994
[38] A S Fokas ldquoOn a class of physically important integrableequationsrdquo Physica D vol 87 no 1ndash4 pp 145ndash150 1995
[39] Q Bi ldquoWave patterns associated with a singular line for a bi-Hamiltonian systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 369 no 5-6 pp407ndash417 2007
[40] J Li and J Zhang ldquoBifurcations of travelling wave solutions forthe generalization form of the modified KdV equationrdquo ChaosSolitons and Fractals vol 21 no 4 pp 899ndash913 2004
[41] W Rui B He Y Long and C Chen ldquoThe integral bifurcationmethod and its application for solving a family of third-orderdispersive PDEsrdquo Nonlinear Analysis Theory Methods andApplications vol 69 no 4 pp 1256ndash1267 2008
[42] W Rui C Chen X Yang and Y Long ldquoSome new soliton-like solutions and periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop to a generalized KdV equationrdquo Applied Mathematics andComputation vol 217 no 4 pp 1666ndash1677 2010
[43] Y Long and C Chen ldquoExistence analysis of traveling wavesolutions for a generalization of KdV equationrdquo MathematicalProblems in Engineering vol 2013 Article ID 462957 7 pages2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
4 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Comparing the coefficients of 120582119873 in (30) we find
119901(0)
11= minus119901(0)
22= 120597119909ln119860119873 119901
(0)
12= 1198602
119873
119901(0)
21=
1
1198602
119873
3
4ℎ2
0
(31)
Substituting (22) into (31) yields
119901(0)
11= minus119901(0)
22= 0 119901
(0)
12= 1198602
119873= 1 (32)
From (22) (24) (25) and (31) and noticing 119906 in (23) we get
119901(0)
21= minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
(33)
Thus 119875(120582) = M The proof of Theorem 1 is completed
Finally by using same way toTheorem 1 we prove thatNin (12) has the same form asN under the transformation (10)and (24) see the following theory and its proof
Theorem 2 ThematrixN defined by (12) has the same type asN in which the old potential 119906 is mapped into 119906 via the sameDT (24)
Proof Let Tminus1 = Tlowast detT and
(T119905+ TN)Tlowast = (11989211 (120582) 11989212 (120582)
11989221(120582) 119892
22(120582)) (34)
It is easy to see that 11989211(120582) and 119892
22(120582) are 2119873th-order
polynomials in 120582 11989212(120582) and 119892
21(120582) are (2119873 + 1)th-order
polynomials in 120582 By using (19) and (8) we obtain
120575119895119905=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times(minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
minus
120572
2
119906119909120575119895+ (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)1205752
119895
(35)
Through direct calculation all 120582119895(0 le 119895 le 2119873) are roots of
119892119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2) Together with (21) and (34) we get
(T119905+ TN)Tlowast = (detT) 119876 (120582) (36)
with
119876 (120582) = (
119902(0)
11119902(1)
12120582 + 119902(0)
12
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21119902(0)
22
) (37)
where 119902(119897)119899119904(119899 119904 = 1 2 119897 = 0 1) are independent of spectral
parameter 120582 Equation (37) can be written as
T119905+ TN = 119876 (120582)T (38)
Comparing the coefficients of 120582119873+1 and 120582119873 in (38) leadsto
119902(1)
12= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873 119902
(1)
21= minus
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
(39)
119902(0)
11= 120597119905ln119860119873+
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
(40)
119902(0)
12= minus(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)1198602
119873minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873119860119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
1198602
119873119863119873minus1
(41)
119902(0)
21=
1
1198602
119873
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
1
1198602
119873
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)minus
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
+
1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
)
+
119860119873minus1
1198602
119873
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
(42)
119902(0)
22= minus120597119905ln119860119873minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
minus
120572
4
119906119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
(43)
Substituting (22) (24) and (25) into (40) to (43) we canget
119902(0)
11=
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909
=
120572
4
119906119909
119902(1)
12120582 + 119902(0)
12
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
120582 minus (
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906) minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
120582 minus (
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906) minus
3120572
ℎ2
0
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(119860119873minus1
+ 119863119873minus1
)
= minus(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
119902(0)
22= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1
minus
120572
4
119906119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119861119873minus1
= minus
120572
4
119906119909minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909
= minus
120572
4
119906119909
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 5
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
120582+
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(44)
On the other hand from (24) (25) and (33) we have
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
=
120572
4
119906119909119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909119909
minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
6120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(45)
From (44) and (45) obviously we have
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
(46)
Thus 119876(120582) = N and this completes the proof of Theorem 2
3 Exact Soliton Solution of (1) andIts Dynamic Properties
In this section we will construct the explicit solutions ofthe integrable shallow water wave (1) by using the Darbouxtransformation (24)
Choosing 119906 = 1199060(1199060is an arbitrary constant) as a seed
solution of (1) and substituting 119906 = 1199060into the spectral
problems (8) Then we get two basic solutions of (8) asfollows
120601 (120582119895) = (
cosh 120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
sinh120583119895
)
120595 (120582119895) = (
sinh120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
cosh 120583119895
)
(47)
with
120583119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
[119909 minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582119895120572
2ℎ2
0
+
1199060120572
2
) 119905]
(48)
where 120582119895is a nonzero constant and 0 lt 119895 le 2119873
According to (19) we have
120575119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
tanh120583119895minus 119903119895
1 minus 119903119895tanh120583
119895
(49)
where 119903119895(0 lt 119895 le 2119873) are nonzero constants
Using the Cramer rule to solve the linear algebraic system(18) we obtain
119860119873minus1
=
Δ119860119873minus1
Δ
(50)
where
Δ =
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ119860119873minus1
=
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(51)
6 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
0
5
0
250
100
150
u
x
tminus5
minus2
(a) 03 lt ℎ0lt 05 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10
0
1000
2000
u
x
t
minus1000
minus5
minus05
minus10
(b) 02 lt ℎ0lt 03 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
Figure 1 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for fixed parameters 1198880= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1 120582
2= minus02
1199031= minus80 1199032 = 20 and 119886 = 01
0
5
00
05
100
5000
u
x
t
minus5000
minus5
minus10
minus05
(a) 0 lt ℎ0lt 02 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10u
x
tminus5
minus10
minus05
minus110
minus111
minus112
(b) ℎ0gt 1 120582
1gt 0 120582
2gt 0
Figure 2 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for parameters (a) ℎ0= 015 119888
0= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1
1205822= minus02 119903
1= minus80 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = 01 (b) ℎ
0= 3 1198880= minus15 120572 = 02 120582
1= 1 120582
2= 02 119903
1= 8 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = minus2
As examples we will investigate exact solutions of (1) intwo simple cases119873 = 1 and119873 = 2 When119873 = 1 solving thelinear algebraic system (18) leads to
1198600=
12057511205822minus 12057521205821
1205752minus 1205751
(52)
Substituting (49) and (52) into (24) a singular double-solitonsolution of (1) is obtained as follows
119906 [1] =
6
ℎ2
0119891
[radicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
1205822
minus radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
1205821]
(53)
where
119891 = radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
minusradicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
(54)
By using program of computer it is easy to verify that thesolution (53) satisfies (1) and this shows that the Darbouxtransformation (24) which we obtained is correct In orderto show the properties of the above singular double-solitonsolutions visually as an example we plot the 3-D graphs ofsolution (53) for some fixed parameters which are shown inFigures 1 and 2
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2
u
x
minus1
Figure 3 The 2-D graph of profile of the exact soliton solution (57)for fixed parameters
When 119873 = 2 using the Cramer rule to solve the linearalgebraic system (18) we obtain
1198601=
Δ1198601
Δ
(55)
with
Δ =
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751120582112057511205821
1 1205752120582212057521205822
1 1205753120582312057531205823
1 1205754120582412057541205824
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ1198601=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751minus1205822
112057511205821
1 1205752minus1205822
212057521205822
1 1205753minus1205822
312057531205823
1 1205754minus1205822
412057541205824
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(56)
where 120575119895(119895 = 1 2 3 4) are given by (49) From (24) an
explicit solution of (1) is obtained by the following
119906 [2] = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
1198601 (57)
where 1198601is given by (55) Equation (57) is a very complex
solution and it is not soliton solution In order to show theproperties of solution (57) under the fixed parameters 120582
1=
minus021205822= minus03120582
3= minus04120582
4= minus01 119886 = 0 119888
0= 15120572 = 12
ℎ0= 08 119903
1= minus02 119903
2= minus03 119903
3= minus04 119903
4= minus05 119905 = 01
we plot its 2-D profile which is shown in Figure 3
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural ScienceFoundation of China (no 11361023) the Natural Science
Foundation of Chongqing Normal University (no 13XLR20)the Scientific Foundation of Education of Yunnan Province(no 2012C199) and the Program Foundation of ChongqingInnovation Team Project in University under Grant noKJTD201308
References
[1] J Li T Xu X Meng Y Zhang H Zhang and B Tian ldquoLaxpair Backlund transformation and N-soliton-like solution fora variable-coefficient Gardner equation from nonlinear latticeplasma physics and ocean dynamics with symbolic computa-tionrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol336 no 2 pp 1443ndash1455 2007
[2] A U Khawaja ldquoA comparative analysis of Painleve Lax pairand similarity transformationmethods in obtaining the integra-bility conditions of nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 5 Article ID 007005JMP 2010
[3] Q X Qu B Tian K Sun and Y Jiang ldquoBacklund transfor-mation Lax pair and solutions for the Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbonequationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no 1 ArticleID 013511 2011
[4] J Lin B Ren H Li and Y Li ldquoSoliton solutions for twononlinear partial differential equations using a Darboux trans-formation of the Lax pairsrdquo Physical Review E vol 77 no 3Article ID 036605 2008
[5] P Wang B Tian W Liu Q Qu M Li and K Sun ldquoLaxpair conservation laws andN-soliton solutions for the extendedKorteweg-de Vries equations in fluidsrdquo European Physical Jour-nal D vol 61 no 3 pp 701ndash708 2011
[6] Y Jiang B Tian W Liu M Li P Wang and K SunldquoSolitons Backlund transformation and Lax pair for the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Pempinelli equation for the waterwavesrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 51 no 9 ArticleID 093519 2010
[7] H Zhi ldquoSymmetry reductions of the Lax pair for the 2 +1-dimensional Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky equationrdquo AppliedMathematics and Computation vol 210 no 2 pp 530ndash5352009
[8] E Fan and K W Chow ldquoDarboux covariant Lax pairs andinfinite conservation laws of the (2+1)-dimensional breakingsoliton equationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no2 Article ID 023504 2011
[9] H Q Zhang B Tian T Xu H Li C Zhang and H ZhangldquoLax pair and Darboux transformation for multi-componentmodified Korteweg-de Vries equationsrdquo Journal of Physics Avol 41 no 35 Article ID 355210 2008
[10] X Lu B Tian K Sun and P Wang ldquoBell-polynomial manip-ulations on the Backlund transformations and Lax pairs forsome soliton equations with one Tau-functionrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 11 Article ID 113506 2010
[11] A S Fokas ldquoLax pairs a novel type of separabilityrdquo InverseProblems vol 25 no 12 Article ID 123007 2009
[12] E Fan ldquoNew bilinear Backlund transformation and Lax pairfor the supersymmetric two-Boson equationrdquo Studies in AppliedMathematics vol 127 no 3 pp 284ndash301 2011
[13] S F Tian and H Q Zhang ldquoLax pair binary darbouxtransformation and new grammian solutions of nonisospec-tral kadomtsevpetviashvili equation with the two-singular-manifold methodrdquo Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physicsvol 17 no 4 pp 491ndash502 2010
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[14] X Lu B Tian H Q Zhang T Xu and H Li ldquoGener-alized (2+1)-dimensional Gardner model bilinear equationsBacklund transformation Lax representation and interactionmechanismsrdquoNonlinearDynamics vol 67 no 3 pp 2279ndash22902012
[15] X L Gai Y T Gao L Wang et al ldquoPainleve property Laxpair and Darboux transformation of the variable-coefficientmodified Kortweg-de Vries model in fluid-filled elastic tubesrdquoCommunications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simula-tion vol 16 no 4 pp 1776ndash1782 2011
[16] J Avan and A Doikou ldquoBoundary Lax pairs for the An(1) Todafield theoriesrdquo Nuclear Physics B vol 821 no 3 pp 481ndash5052009
[17] Y He and H W Tam ldquoBilinear Backlund transformationand Lax pair for a coupled Ramani equationrdquo Journal ofMathematical Analysis and Applications vol 357 no 1 pp 132ndash136 2009
[18] H Q Zhang B Tian X H Meng X Lu and W Liu ldquoConser-vation laws soliton solutions and modulational instability forthe higher-order dispersive nonlinear Schrodinger equationrdquoEuropean Physical Journal B vol 72 no 2 pp 233ndash239 2009
[19] X Yu Y T Gao Z Y Sun and Y Liu ldquoWronskian solutionsand integrability for a generalized variable-coefficient forcedKorteweg-de Vries equation in fluidsrdquoNonlinear Dynamics vol67 no 2 pp 1023ndash1030 2012
[20] HQ Zhang B Tian L L Li andY Xue ldquoDarboux transforma-tion and soliton solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinearSchrodinger hierarchy with symbolic computationrdquo Physica Avol 388 no 1 pp 9ndash20 2009
[21] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[22] V B Matveev and M A Salle ldquoScattering of solitons inthe formalism of the Darboux transformrdquo Journal of SovietMathematics vol 34 no 5 pp 1983ndash1987 1986
[23] X Geng and H W Tam ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquoJournal of the Physical Society of Japan vol 68 no 5 pp 1508ndash1512 1999
[24] Y Li W X Ma and J E Zhang ldquoDarboux transformationsof classical Boussinesq system and its new solutionsrdquo PhysicsLetters A vol 275 no 1-2 pp 60ndash66 2000
[25] X Li and A Chen ldquoDarboux transformation and multi-solitonsolutions of Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquo Physics Letters Avol 342 no 5-6 pp 413ndash420 2005
[26] A Chen and X Li ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquoChaos Solitons andFractals vol 27 no 1 pp 43ndash49 2006
[27] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[28] Z B Zhaqilao and Z Li ldquoDarboux transformation and bidi-rectional soliton solutions of a new (2 + 1)-dimensional solitonequationrdquo Physics Letters A vol 372 no 9 pp 1422ndash1428 2008
[29] H X Yang ldquoSoliton solutions by Darboux transformation for aHamiltonian lattice systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 373 no 7 pp741ndash748 2009
[30] X Wu W Rui and X Hong ldquoA new discrete integrable systemderived from a generalized Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy and itsDarboux transformationrdquo Discrete Dynamics in Nature andSociety vol 2012 Article ID 652076 19 pages 2012
[31] W XMa ldquoDarboux transformations for a lax integrable systemin 2n dimensionsrdquo Letters in Mathematical Physics vol 39 no1 pp 33ndash49 1997
[32] W X Ma ldquoThe algebraic structure of zero curvature repre-sentations and application to coupled KdV systemsrdquo Journal ofPhysics A vol 26 no 11 pp 2573ndash2582 1993
[33] R Camassa and D D Holm ldquoAn integrable shallow waterequation with peaked solitonsrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 71no 11 pp 1661ndash1664 1993
[34] G B Whitham Linear and Nonlinear Waves Wiley New YorkNY USA 1974
[35] B Fuchssteiner and A S Fokas ldquoSymplectic structures theirBacklund transformations and hereditary symmetriesrdquo PhysicaD vol 4 no 1 pp 47ndash66 1981
[36] B Fuchssteiner ldquoThe Lie algebra structure of nonlinear evolu-tion equations admitting infinite dimensional abelian symme-try groupsrdquoProgress ofTheoretical Physics vol 65 no 3 pp 861ndash876 1981
[37] A S Fokas and P M Santini ldquoAn inverse acoustic problem andlinearization of moderate amplitude dispersive wavesrdquo 1994
[38] A S Fokas ldquoOn a class of physically important integrableequationsrdquo Physica D vol 87 no 1ndash4 pp 145ndash150 1995
[39] Q Bi ldquoWave patterns associated with a singular line for a bi-Hamiltonian systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 369 no 5-6 pp407ndash417 2007
[40] J Li and J Zhang ldquoBifurcations of travelling wave solutions forthe generalization form of the modified KdV equationrdquo ChaosSolitons and Fractals vol 21 no 4 pp 899ndash913 2004
[41] W Rui B He Y Long and C Chen ldquoThe integral bifurcationmethod and its application for solving a family of third-orderdispersive PDEsrdquo Nonlinear Analysis Theory Methods andApplications vol 69 no 4 pp 1256ndash1267 2008
[42] W Rui C Chen X Yang and Y Long ldquoSome new soliton-like solutions and periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop to a generalized KdV equationrdquo Applied Mathematics andComputation vol 217 no 4 pp 1666ndash1677 2010
[43] Y Long and C Chen ldquoExistence analysis of traveling wavesolutions for a generalization of KdV equationrdquo MathematicalProblems in Engineering vol 2013 Article ID 462957 7 pages2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 5
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21
= minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
120582+
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
120572
2
119906)minus
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119863119873minus1
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
(
1198880
4120572
+
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2
) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus
3
4ℎ2
0
(
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906) +
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(44)
On the other hand from (24) (25) and (33) we have
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
=
120572
4
119906119909119909+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1119909119909
minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
6120572
2ℎ2
0
3
4ℎ2
0
119860119873minus1
=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
3
4ℎ2
0
+
3120572
2ℎ2
0
119862119873minus1119909
(45)
From (44) and (45) obviously we have
119902(1)
21120582 + 119902(0)
21=
120572
4
119906119909119909minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582120572
2ℎ2
0
+
120572
2
119906)
times (minus
1198880
4120582120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
119906 minus (13) ℎ2
0119906119909119909
2120582
)
(46)
Thus 119876(120582) = N and this completes the proof of Theorem 2
3 Exact Soliton Solution of (1) andIts Dynamic Properties
In this section we will construct the explicit solutions ofthe integrable shallow water wave (1) by using the Darbouxtransformation (24)
Choosing 119906 = 1199060(1199060is an arbitrary constant) as a seed
solution of (1) and substituting 119906 = 1199060into the spectral
problems (8) Then we get two basic solutions of (8) asfollows
120601 (120582119895) = (
cosh 120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
sinh120583119895
)
120595 (120582119895) = (
sinh120583119895
radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
cosh 120583119895
)
(47)
with
120583119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
[119909 minus (
1198880
2
+
3120582119895120572
2ℎ2
0
+
1199060120572
2
) 119905]
(48)
where 120582119895is a nonzero constant and 0 lt 119895 le 2119873
According to (19) we have
120575119895= radicminus
1198880
4120582119895120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
2120582119895
tanh120583119895minus 119903119895
1 minus 119903119895tanh120583
119895
(49)
where 119903119895(0 lt 119895 le 2119873) are nonzero constants
Using the Cramer rule to solve the linear algebraic system(18) we obtain
119860119873minus1
=
Δ119860119873minus1
Δ
(50)
where
Δ =
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot 120582119873minus1
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ119860119873minus1
=
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751
1205821
12057511205821
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
11205751120582119896
1sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
11205751120582119873minus1
1
1 1205752
1205822
12057521205822
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21205752120582119896
2sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21205752120582119873minus1
2
1 1205752119873
1205822119873
12057521198731205822119873
sdot sdot sdot 120582119896
21198731205752119873120582119896
2119873sdot sdot sdot minus120582
119873
21198731205752119873120582119873minus1
2119873
1003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(51)
6 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
0
5
0
250
100
150
u
x
tminus5
minus2
(a) 03 lt ℎ0lt 05 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10
0
1000
2000
u
x
t
minus1000
minus5
minus05
minus10
(b) 02 lt ℎ0lt 03 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
Figure 1 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for fixed parameters 1198880= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1 120582
2= minus02
1199031= minus80 1199032 = 20 and 119886 = 01
0
5
00
05
100
5000
u
x
t
minus5000
minus5
minus10
minus05
(a) 0 lt ℎ0lt 02 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10u
x
tminus5
minus10
minus05
minus110
minus111
minus112
(b) ℎ0gt 1 120582
1gt 0 120582
2gt 0
Figure 2 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for parameters (a) ℎ0= 015 119888
0= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1
1205822= minus02 119903
1= minus80 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = 01 (b) ℎ
0= 3 1198880= minus15 120572 = 02 120582
1= 1 120582
2= 02 119903
1= 8 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = minus2
As examples we will investigate exact solutions of (1) intwo simple cases119873 = 1 and119873 = 2 When119873 = 1 solving thelinear algebraic system (18) leads to
1198600=
12057511205822minus 12057521205821
1205752minus 1205751
(52)
Substituting (49) and (52) into (24) a singular double-solitonsolution of (1) is obtained as follows
119906 [1] =
6
ℎ2
0119891
[radicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
1205822
minus radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
1205821]
(53)
where
119891 = radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
minusradicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
(54)
By using program of computer it is easy to verify that thesolution (53) satisfies (1) and this shows that the Darbouxtransformation (24) which we obtained is correct In orderto show the properties of the above singular double-solitonsolutions visually as an example we plot the 3-D graphs ofsolution (53) for some fixed parameters which are shown inFigures 1 and 2
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2
u
x
minus1
Figure 3 The 2-D graph of profile of the exact soliton solution (57)for fixed parameters
When 119873 = 2 using the Cramer rule to solve the linearalgebraic system (18) we obtain
1198601=
Δ1198601
Δ
(55)
with
Δ =
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751120582112057511205821
1 1205752120582212057521205822
1 1205753120582312057531205823
1 1205754120582412057541205824
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ1198601=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751minus1205822
112057511205821
1 1205752minus1205822
212057521205822
1 1205753minus1205822
312057531205823
1 1205754minus1205822
412057541205824
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(56)
where 120575119895(119895 = 1 2 3 4) are given by (49) From (24) an
explicit solution of (1) is obtained by the following
119906 [2] = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
1198601 (57)
where 1198601is given by (55) Equation (57) is a very complex
solution and it is not soliton solution In order to show theproperties of solution (57) under the fixed parameters 120582
1=
minus021205822= minus03120582
3= minus04120582
4= minus01 119886 = 0 119888
0= 15120572 = 12
ℎ0= 08 119903
1= minus02 119903
2= minus03 119903
3= minus04 119903
4= minus05 119905 = 01
we plot its 2-D profile which is shown in Figure 3
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural ScienceFoundation of China (no 11361023) the Natural Science
Foundation of Chongqing Normal University (no 13XLR20)the Scientific Foundation of Education of Yunnan Province(no 2012C199) and the Program Foundation of ChongqingInnovation Team Project in University under Grant noKJTD201308
References
[1] J Li T Xu X Meng Y Zhang H Zhang and B Tian ldquoLaxpair Backlund transformation and N-soliton-like solution fora variable-coefficient Gardner equation from nonlinear latticeplasma physics and ocean dynamics with symbolic computa-tionrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol336 no 2 pp 1443ndash1455 2007
[2] A U Khawaja ldquoA comparative analysis of Painleve Lax pairand similarity transformationmethods in obtaining the integra-bility conditions of nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 5 Article ID 007005JMP 2010
[3] Q X Qu B Tian K Sun and Y Jiang ldquoBacklund transfor-mation Lax pair and solutions for the Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbonequationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no 1 ArticleID 013511 2011
[4] J Lin B Ren H Li and Y Li ldquoSoliton solutions for twononlinear partial differential equations using a Darboux trans-formation of the Lax pairsrdquo Physical Review E vol 77 no 3Article ID 036605 2008
[5] P Wang B Tian W Liu Q Qu M Li and K Sun ldquoLaxpair conservation laws andN-soliton solutions for the extendedKorteweg-de Vries equations in fluidsrdquo European Physical Jour-nal D vol 61 no 3 pp 701ndash708 2011
[6] Y Jiang B Tian W Liu M Li P Wang and K SunldquoSolitons Backlund transformation and Lax pair for the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Pempinelli equation for the waterwavesrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 51 no 9 ArticleID 093519 2010
[7] H Zhi ldquoSymmetry reductions of the Lax pair for the 2 +1-dimensional Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky equationrdquo AppliedMathematics and Computation vol 210 no 2 pp 530ndash5352009
[8] E Fan and K W Chow ldquoDarboux covariant Lax pairs andinfinite conservation laws of the (2+1)-dimensional breakingsoliton equationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no2 Article ID 023504 2011
[9] H Q Zhang B Tian T Xu H Li C Zhang and H ZhangldquoLax pair and Darboux transformation for multi-componentmodified Korteweg-de Vries equationsrdquo Journal of Physics Avol 41 no 35 Article ID 355210 2008
[10] X Lu B Tian K Sun and P Wang ldquoBell-polynomial manip-ulations on the Backlund transformations and Lax pairs forsome soliton equations with one Tau-functionrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 11 Article ID 113506 2010
[11] A S Fokas ldquoLax pairs a novel type of separabilityrdquo InverseProblems vol 25 no 12 Article ID 123007 2009
[12] E Fan ldquoNew bilinear Backlund transformation and Lax pairfor the supersymmetric two-Boson equationrdquo Studies in AppliedMathematics vol 127 no 3 pp 284ndash301 2011
[13] S F Tian and H Q Zhang ldquoLax pair binary darbouxtransformation and new grammian solutions of nonisospec-tral kadomtsevpetviashvili equation with the two-singular-manifold methodrdquo Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physicsvol 17 no 4 pp 491ndash502 2010
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[14] X Lu B Tian H Q Zhang T Xu and H Li ldquoGener-alized (2+1)-dimensional Gardner model bilinear equationsBacklund transformation Lax representation and interactionmechanismsrdquoNonlinearDynamics vol 67 no 3 pp 2279ndash22902012
[15] X L Gai Y T Gao L Wang et al ldquoPainleve property Laxpair and Darboux transformation of the variable-coefficientmodified Kortweg-de Vries model in fluid-filled elastic tubesrdquoCommunications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simula-tion vol 16 no 4 pp 1776ndash1782 2011
[16] J Avan and A Doikou ldquoBoundary Lax pairs for the An(1) Todafield theoriesrdquo Nuclear Physics B vol 821 no 3 pp 481ndash5052009
[17] Y He and H W Tam ldquoBilinear Backlund transformationand Lax pair for a coupled Ramani equationrdquo Journal ofMathematical Analysis and Applications vol 357 no 1 pp 132ndash136 2009
[18] H Q Zhang B Tian X H Meng X Lu and W Liu ldquoConser-vation laws soliton solutions and modulational instability forthe higher-order dispersive nonlinear Schrodinger equationrdquoEuropean Physical Journal B vol 72 no 2 pp 233ndash239 2009
[19] X Yu Y T Gao Z Y Sun and Y Liu ldquoWronskian solutionsand integrability for a generalized variable-coefficient forcedKorteweg-de Vries equation in fluidsrdquoNonlinear Dynamics vol67 no 2 pp 1023ndash1030 2012
[20] HQ Zhang B Tian L L Li andY Xue ldquoDarboux transforma-tion and soliton solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinearSchrodinger hierarchy with symbolic computationrdquo Physica Avol 388 no 1 pp 9ndash20 2009
[21] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[22] V B Matveev and M A Salle ldquoScattering of solitons inthe formalism of the Darboux transformrdquo Journal of SovietMathematics vol 34 no 5 pp 1983ndash1987 1986
[23] X Geng and H W Tam ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquoJournal of the Physical Society of Japan vol 68 no 5 pp 1508ndash1512 1999
[24] Y Li W X Ma and J E Zhang ldquoDarboux transformationsof classical Boussinesq system and its new solutionsrdquo PhysicsLetters A vol 275 no 1-2 pp 60ndash66 2000
[25] X Li and A Chen ldquoDarboux transformation and multi-solitonsolutions of Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquo Physics Letters Avol 342 no 5-6 pp 413ndash420 2005
[26] A Chen and X Li ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquoChaos Solitons andFractals vol 27 no 1 pp 43ndash49 2006
[27] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[28] Z B Zhaqilao and Z Li ldquoDarboux transformation and bidi-rectional soliton solutions of a new (2 + 1)-dimensional solitonequationrdquo Physics Letters A vol 372 no 9 pp 1422ndash1428 2008
[29] H X Yang ldquoSoliton solutions by Darboux transformation for aHamiltonian lattice systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 373 no 7 pp741ndash748 2009
[30] X Wu W Rui and X Hong ldquoA new discrete integrable systemderived from a generalized Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy and itsDarboux transformationrdquo Discrete Dynamics in Nature andSociety vol 2012 Article ID 652076 19 pages 2012
[31] W XMa ldquoDarboux transformations for a lax integrable systemin 2n dimensionsrdquo Letters in Mathematical Physics vol 39 no1 pp 33ndash49 1997
[32] W X Ma ldquoThe algebraic structure of zero curvature repre-sentations and application to coupled KdV systemsrdquo Journal ofPhysics A vol 26 no 11 pp 2573ndash2582 1993
[33] R Camassa and D D Holm ldquoAn integrable shallow waterequation with peaked solitonsrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 71no 11 pp 1661ndash1664 1993
[34] G B Whitham Linear and Nonlinear Waves Wiley New YorkNY USA 1974
[35] B Fuchssteiner and A S Fokas ldquoSymplectic structures theirBacklund transformations and hereditary symmetriesrdquo PhysicaD vol 4 no 1 pp 47ndash66 1981
[36] B Fuchssteiner ldquoThe Lie algebra structure of nonlinear evolu-tion equations admitting infinite dimensional abelian symme-try groupsrdquoProgress ofTheoretical Physics vol 65 no 3 pp 861ndash876 1981
[37] A S Fokas and P M Santini ldquoAn inverse acoustic problem andlinearization of moderate amplitude dispersive wavesrdquo 1994
[38] A S Fokas ldquoOn a class of physically important integrableequationsrdquo Physica D vol 87 no 1ndash4 pp 145ndash150 1995
[39] Q Bi ldquoWave patterns associated with a singular line for a bi-Hamiltonian systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 369 no 5-6 pp407ndash417 2007
[40] J Li and J Zhang ldquoBifurcations of travelling wave solutions forthe generalization form of the modified KdV equationrdquo ChaosSolitons and Fractals vol 21 no 4 pp 899ndash913 2004
[41] W Rui B He Y Long and C Chen ldquoThe integral bifurcationmethod and its application for solving a family of third-orderdispersive PDEsrdquo Nonlinear Analysis Theory Methods andApplications vol 69 no 4 pp 1256ndash1267 2008
[42] W Rui C Chen X Yang and Y Long ldquoSome new soliton-like solutions and periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop to a generalized KdV equationrdquo Applied Mathematics andComputation vol 217 no 4 pp 1666ndash1677 2010
[43] Y Long and C Chen ldquoExistence analysis of traveling wavesolutions for a generalization of KdV equationrdquo MathematicalProblems in Engineering vol 2013 Article ID 462957 7 pages2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
6 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
0
5
0
250
100
150
u
x
tminus5
minus2
(a) 03 lt ℎ0lt 05 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10
0
1000
2000
u
x
t
minus1000
minus5
minus05
minus10
(b) 02 lt ℎ0lt 03 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
Figure 1 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for fixed parameters 1198880= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1 120582
2= minus02
1199031= minus80 1199032 = 20 and 119886 = 01
0
5
00
05
100
5000
u
x
t
minus5000
minus5
minus10
minus05
(a) 0 lt ℎ0lt 02 120582
1lt 0 120582
2lt 0
0
5
00
05
10u
x
tminus5
minus10
minus05
minus110
minus111
minus112
(b) ℎ0gt 1 120582
1gt 0 120582
2gt 0
Figure 2 The 3-D graphs of profiles of the singular double-soliton solution (53) for parameters (a) ℎ0= 015 119888
0= 15 120572 = 02 120582
1= minus1
1205822= minus02 119903
1= minus80 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = 01 (b) ℎ
0= 3 1198880= minus15 120572 = 02 120582
1= 1 120582
2= 02 119903
1= 8 119903
2= 20 and 119886 = minus2
As examples we will investigate exact solutions of (1) intwo simple cases119873 = 1 and119873 = 2 When119873 = 1 solving thelinear algebraic system (18) leads to
1198600=
12057511205822minus 12057521205821
1205752minus 1205751
(52)
Substituting (49) and (52) into (24) a singular double-solitonsolution of (1) is obtained as follows
119906 [1] =
6
ℎ2
0119891
[radicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
1205822
minus radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
1205821]
(53)
where
119891 = radicminus
1198880
41205822120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205822
tanh1205832minus 1199032
1 minus 1199032tanh120583
2
minusradicminus
1198880
41205821120572
+
3
4ℎ2
0
minus
1199060
21205821
tanh1205831minus 1199031
1 minus 1199031tanh120583
1
(54)
By using program of computer it is easy to verify that thesolution (53) satisfies (1) and this shows that the Darbouxtransformation (24) which we obtained is correct In orderto show the properties of the above singular double-solitonsolutions visually as an example we plot the 3-D graphs ofsolution (53) for some fixed parameters which are shown inFigures 1 and 2
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2
u
x
minus1
Figure 3 The 2-D graph of profile of the exact soliton solution (57)for fixed parameters
When 119873 = 2 using the Cramer rule to solve the linearalgebraic system (18) we obtain
1198601=
Δ1198601
Δ
(55)
with
Δ =
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751120582112057511205821
1 1205752120582212057521205822
1 1205753120582312057531205823
1 1205754120582412057541205824
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ1198601=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751minus1205822
112057511205821
1 1205752minus1205822
212057521205822
1 1205753minus1205822
312057531205823
1 1205754minus1205822
412057541205824
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(56)
where 120575119895(119895 = 1 2 3 4) are given by (49) From (24) an
explicit solution of (1) is obtained by the following
119906 [2] = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
1198601 (57)
where 1198601is given by (55) Equation (57) is a very complex
solution and it is not soliton solution In order to show theproperties of solution (57) under the fixed parameters 120582
1=
minus021205822= minus03120582
3= minus04120582
4= minus01 119886 = 0 119888
0= 15120572 = 12
ℎ0= 08 119903
1= minus02 119903
2= minus03 119903
3= minus04 119903
4= minus05 119905 = 01
we plot its 2-D profile which is shown in Figure 3
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural ScienceFoundation of China (no 11361023) the Natural Science
Foundation of Chongqing Normal University (no 13XLR20)the Scientific Foundation of Education of Yunnan Province(no 2012C199) and the Program Foundation of ChongqingInnovation Team Project in University under Grant noKJTD201308
References
[1] J Li T Xu X Meng Y Zhang H Zhang and B Tian ldquoLaxpair Backlund transformation and N-soliton-like solution fora variable-coefficient Gardner equation from nonlinear latticeplasma physics and ocean dynamics with symbolic computa-tionrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol336 no 2 pp 1443ndash1455 2007
[2] A U Khawaja ldquoA comparative analysis of Painleve Lax pairand similarity transformationmethods in obtaining the integra-bility conditions of nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 5 Article ID 007005JMP 2010
[3] Q X Qu B Tian K Sun and Y Jiang ldquoBacklund transfor-mation Lax pair and solutions for the Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbonequationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no 1 ArticleID 013511 2011
[4] J Lin B Ren H Li and Y Li ldquoSoliton solutions for twononlinear partial differential equations using a Darboux trans-formation of the Lax pairsrdquo Physical Review E vol 77 no 3Article ID 036605 2008
[5] P Wang B Tian W Liu Q Qu M Li and K Sun ldquoLaxpair conservation laws andN-soliton solutions for the extendedKorteweg-de Vries equations in fluidsrdquo European Physical Jour-nal D vol 61 no 3 pp 701ndash708 2011
[6] Y Jiang B Tian W Liu M Li P Wang and K SunldquoSolitons Backlund transformation and Lax pair for the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Pempinelli equation for the waterwavesrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 51 no 9 ArticleID 093519 2010
[7] H Zhi ldquoSymmetry reductions of the Lax pair for the 2 +1-dimensional Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky equationrdquo AppliedMathematics and Computation vol 210 no 2 pp 530ndash5352009
[8] E Fan and K W Chow ldquoDarboux covariant Lax pairs andinfinite conservation laws of the (2+1)-dimensional breakingsoliton equationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no2 Article ID 023504 2011
[9] H Q Zhang B Tian T Xu H Li C Zhang and H ZhangldquoLax pair and Darboux transformation for multi-componentmodified Korteweg-de Vries equationsrdquo Journal of Physics Avol 41 no 35 Article ID 355210 2008
[10] X Lu B Tian K Sun and P Wang ldquoBell-polynomial manip-ulations on the Backlund transformations and Lax pairs forsome soliton equations with one Tau-functionrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 11 Article ID 113506 2010
[11] A S Fokas ldquoLax pairs a novel type of separabilityrdquo InverseProblems vol 25 no 12 Article ID 123007 2009
[12] E Fan ldquoNew bilinear Backlund transformation and Lax pairfor the supersymmetric two-Boson equationrdquo Studies in AppliedMathematics vol 127 no 3 pp 284ndash301 2011
[13] S F Tian and H Q Zhang ldquoLax pair binary darbouxtransformation and new grammian solutions of nonisospec-tral kadomtsevpetviashvili equation with the two-singular-manifold methodrdquo Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physicsvol 17 no 4 pp 491ndash502 2010
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[14] X Lu B Tian H Q Zhang T Xu and H Li ldquoGener-alized (2+1)-dimensional Gardner model bilinear equationsBacklund transformation Lax representation and interactionmechanismsrdquoNonlinearDynamics vol 67 no 3 pp 2279ndash22902012
[15] X L Gai Y T Gao L Wang et al ldquoPainleve property Laxpair and Darboux transformation of the variable-coefficientmodified Kortweg-de Vries model in fluid-filled elastic tubesrdquoCommunications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simula-tion vol 16 no 4 pp 1776ndash1782 2011
[16] J Avan and A Doikou ldquoBoundary Lax pairs for the An(1) Todafield theoriesrdquo Nuclear Physics B vol 821 no 3 pp 481ndash5052009
[17] Y He and H W Tam ldquoBilinear Backlund transformationand Lax pair for a coupled Ramani equationrdquo Journal ofMathematical Analysis and Applications vol 357 no 1 pp 132ndash136 2009
[18] H Q Zhang B Tian X H Meng X Lu and W Liu ldquoConser-vation laws soliton solutions and modulational instability forthe higher-order dispersive nonlinear Schrodinger equationrdquoEuropean Physical Journal B vol 72 no 2 pp 233ndash239 2009
[19] X Yu Y T Gao Z Y Sun and Y Liu ldquoWronskian solutionsand integrability for a generalized variable-coefficient forcedKorteweg-de Vries equation in fluidsrdquoNonlinear Dynamics vol67 no 2 pp 1023ndash1030 2012
[20] HQ Zhang B Tian L L Li andY Xue ldquoDarboux transforma-tion and soliton solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinearSchrodinger hierarchy with symbolic computationrdquo Physica Avol 388 no 1 pp 9ndash20 2009
[21] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[22] V B Matveev and M A Salle ldquoScattering of solitons inthe formalism of the Darboux transformrdquo Journal of SovietMathematics vol 34 no 5 pp 1983ndash1987 1986
[23] X Geng and H W Tam ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquoJournal of the Physical Society of Japan vol 68 no 5 pp 1508ndash1512 1999
[24] Y Li W X Ma and J E Zhang ldquoDarboux transformationsof classical Boussinesq system and its new solutionsrdquo PhysicsLetters A vol 275 no 1-2 pp 60ndash66 2000
[25] X Li and A Chen ldquoDarboux transformation and multi-solitonsolutions of Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquo Physics Letters Avol 342 no 5-6 pp 413ndash420 2005
[26] A Chen and X Li ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquoChaos Solitons andFractals vol 27 no 1 pp 43ndash49 2006
[27] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[28] Z B Zhaqilao and Z Li ldquoDarboux transformation and bidi-rectional soliton solutions of a new (2 + 1)-dimensional solitonequationrdquo Physics Letters A vol 372 no 9 pp 1422ndash1428 2008
[29] H X Yang ldquoSoliton solutions by Darboux transformation for aHamiltonian lattice systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 373 no 7 pp741ndash748 2009
[30] X Wu W Rui and X Hong ldquoA new discrete integrable systemderived from a generalized Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy and itsDarboux transformationrdquo Discrete Dynamics in Nature andSociety vol 2012 Article ID 652076 19 pages 2012
[31] W XMa ldquoDarboux transformations for a lax integrable systemin 2n dimensionsrdquo Letters in Mathematical Physics vol 39 no1 pp 33ndash49 1997
[32] W X Ma ldquoThe algebraic structure of zero curvature repre-sentations and application to coupled KdV systemsrdquo Journal ofPhysics A vol 26 no 11 pp 2573ndash2582 1993
[33] R Camassa and D D Holm ldquoAn integrable shallow waterequation with peaked solitonsrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 71no 11 pp 1661ndash1664 1993
[34] G B Whitham Linear and Nonlinear Waves Wiley New YorkNY USA 1974
[35] B Fuchssteiner and A S Fokas ldquoSymplectic structures theirBacklund transformations and hereditary symmetriesrdquo PhysicaD vol 4 no 1 pp 47ndash66 1981
[36] B Fuchssteiner ldquoThe Lie algebra structure of nonlinear evolu-tion equations admitting infinite dimensional abelian symme-try groupsrdquoProgress ofTheoretical Physics vol 65 no 3 pp 861ndash876 1981
[37] A S Fokas and P M Santini ldquoAn inverse acoustic problem andlinearization of moderate amplitude dispersive wavesrdquo 1994
[38] A S Fokas ldquoOn a class of physically important integrableequationsrdquo Physica D vol 87 no 1ndash4 pp 145ndash150 1995
[39] Q Bi ldquoWave patterns associated with a singular line for a bi-Hamiltonian systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 369 no 5-6 pp407ndash417 2007
[40] J Li and J Zhang ldquoBifurcations of travelling wave solutions forthe generalization form of the modified KdV equationrdquo ChaosSolitons and Fractals vol 21 no 4 pp 899ndash913 2004
[41] W Rui B He Y Long and C Chen ldquoThe integral bifurcationmethod and its application for solving a family of third-orderdispersive PDEsrdquo Nonlinear Analysis Theory Methods andApplications vol 69 no 4 pp 1256ndash1267 2008
[42] W Rui C Chen X Yang and Y Long ldquoSome new soliton-like solutions and periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop to a generalized KdV equationrdquo Applied Mathematics andComputation vol 217 no 4 pp 1666ndash1677 2010
[43] Y Long and C Chen ldquoExistence analysis of traveling wavesolutions for a generalization of KdV equationrdquo MathematicalProblems in Engineering vol 2013 Article ID 462957 7 pages2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Mathematical Problems in Engineering 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2
u
x
minus1
Figure 3 The 2-D graph of profile of the exact soliton solution (57)for fixed parameters
When 119873 = 2 using the Cramer rule to solve the linearalgebraic system (18) we obtain
1198601=
Δ1198601
Δ
(55)
with
Δ =
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751120582112057511205821
1 1205752120582212057521205822
1 1205753120582312057531205823
1 1205754120582412057541205824
100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
Δ1198601=
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
1 1205751minus1205822
112057511205821
1 1205752minus1205822
212057521205822
1 1205753minus1205822
312057531205823
1 1205754minus1205822
412057541205824
10038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816100381610038161003816
(56)
where 120575119895(119895 = 1 2 3 4) are given by (49) From (24) an
explicit solution of (1) is obtained by the following
119906 [2] = 119906 +
6
ℎ2
0
1198601 (57)
where 1198601is given by (55) Equation (57) is a very complex
solution and it is not soliton solution In order to show theproperties of solution (57) under the fixed parameters 120582
1=
minus021205822= minus03120582
3= minus04120582
4= minus01 119886 = 0 119888
0= 15120572 = 12
ℎ0= 08 119903
1= minus02 119903
2= minus03 119903
3= minus04 119903
4= minus05 119905 = 01
we plot its 2-D profile which is shown in Figure 3
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural ScienceFoundation of China (no 11361023) the Natural Science
Foundation of Chongqing Normal University (no 13XLR20)the Scientific Foundation of Education of Yunnan Province(no 2012C199) and the Program Foundation of ChongqingInnovation Team Project in University under Grant noKJTD201308
References
[1] J Li T Xu X Meng Y Zhang H Zhang and B Tian ldquoLaxpair Backlund transformation and N-soliton-like solution fora variable-coefficient Gardner equation from nonlinear latticeplasma physics and ocean dynamics with symbolic computa-tionrdquo Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications vol336 no 2 pp 1443ndash1455 2007
[2] A U Khawaja ldquoA comparative analysis of Painleve Lax pairand similarity transformationmethods in obtaining the integra-bility conditions of nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 5 Article ID 007005JMP 2010
[3] Q X Qu B Tian K Sun and Y Jiang ldquoBacklund transfor-mation Lax pair and solutions for the Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbonequationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no 1 ArticleID 013511 2011
[4] J Lin B Ren H Li and Y Li ldquoSoliton solutions for twononlinear partial differential equations using a Darboux trans-formation of the Lax pairsrdquo Physical Review E vol 77 no 3Article ID 036605 2008
[5] P Wang B Tian W Liu Q Qu M Li and K Sun ldquoLaxpair conservation laws andN-soliton solutions for the extendedKorteweg-de Vries equations in fluidsrdquo European Physical Jour-nal D vol 61 no 3 pp 701ndash708 2011
[6] Y Jiang B Tian W Liu M Li P Wang and K SunldquoSolitons Backlund transformation and Lax pair for the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Pempinelli equation for the waterwavesrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 51 no 9 ArticleID 093519 2010
[7] H Zhi ldquoSymmetry reductions of the Lax pair for the 2 +1-dimensional Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky equationrdquo AppliedMathematics and Computation vol 210 no 2 pp 530ndash5352009
[8] E Fan and K W Chow ldquoDarboux covariant Lax pairs andinfinite conservation laws of the (2+1)-dimensional breakingsoliton equationrdquo Journal of Mathematical Physics vol 52 no2 Article ID 023504 2011
[9] H Q Zhang B Tian T Xu H Li C Zhang and H ZhangldquoLax pair and Darboux transformation for multi-componentmodified Korteweg-de Vries equationsrdquo Journal of Physics Avol 41 no 35 Article ID 355210 2008
[10] X Lu B Tian K Sun and P Wang ldquoBell-polynomial manip-ulations on the Backlund transformations and Lax pairs forsome soliton equations with one Tau-functionrdquo Journal ofMathematical Physics vol 51 no 11 Article ID 113506 2010
[11] A S Fokas ldquoLax pairs a novel type of separabilityrdquo InverseProblems vol 25 no 12 Article ID 123007 2009
[12] E Fan ldquoNew bilinear Backlund transformation and Lax pairfor the supersymmetric two-Boson equationrdquo Studies in AppliedMathematics vol 127 no 3 pp 284ndash301 2011
[13] S F Tian and H Q Zhang ldquoLax pair binary darbouxtransformation and new grammian solutions of nonisospec-tral kadomtsevpetviashvili equation with the two-singular-manifold methodrdquo Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physicsvol 17 no 4 pp 491ndash502 2010
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[14] X Lu B Tian H Q Zhang T Xu and H Li ldquoGener-alized (2+1)-dimensional Gardner model bilinear equationsBacklund transformation Lax representation and interactionmechanismsrdquoNonlinearDynamics vol 67 no 3 pp 2279ndash22902012
[15] X L Gai Y T Gao L Wang et al ldquoPainleve property Laxpair and Darboux transformation of the variable-coefficientmodified Kortweg-de Vries model in fluid-filled elastic tubesrdquoCommunications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simula-tion vol 16 no 4 pp 1776ndash1782 2011
[16] J Avan and A Doikou ldquoBoundary Lax pairs for the An(1) Todafield theoriesrdquo Nuclear Physics B vol 821 no 3 pp 481ndash5052009
[17] Y He and H W Tam ldquoBilinear Backlund transformationand Lax pair for a coupled Ramani equationrdquo Journal ofMathematical Analysis and Applications vol 357 no 1 pp 132ndash136 2009
[18] H Q Zhang B Tian X H Meng X Lu and W Liu ldquoConser-vation laws soliton solutions and modulational instability forthe higher-order dispersive nonlinear Schrodinger equationrdquoEuropean Physical Journal B vol 72 no 2 pp 233ndash239 2009
[19] X Yu Y T Gao Z Y Sun and Y Liu ldquoWronskian solutionsand integrability for a generalized variable-coefficient forcedKorteweg-de Vries equation in fluidsrdquoNonlinear Dynamics vol67 no 2 pp 1023ndash1030 2012
[20] HQ Zhang B Tian L L Li andY Xue ldquoDarboux transforma-tion and soliton solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinearSchrodinger hierarchy with symbolic computationrdquo Physica Avol 388 no 1 pp 9ndash20 2009
[21] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[22] V B Matveev and M A Salle ldquoScattering of solitons inthe formalism of the Darboux transformrdquo Journal of SovietMathematics vol 34 no 5 pp 1983ndash1987 1986
[23] X Geng and H W Tam ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquoJournal of the Physical Society of Japan vol 68 no 5 pp 1508ndash1512 1999
[24] Y Li W X Ma and J E Zhang ldquoDarboux transformationsof classical Boussinesq system and its new solutionsrdquo PhysicsLetters A vol 275 no 1-2 pp 60ndash66 2000
[25] X Li and A Chen ldquoDarboux transformation and multi-solitonsolutions of Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquo Physics Letters Avol 342 no 5-6 pp 413ndash420 2005
[26] A Chen and X Li ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquoChaos Solitons andFractals vol 27 no 1 pp 43ndash49 2006
[27] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[28] Z B Zhaqilao and Z Li ldquoDarboux transformation and bidi-rectional soliton solutions of a new (2 + 1)-dimensional solitonequationrdquo Physics Letters A vol 372 no 9 pp 1422ndash1428 2008
[29] H X Yang ldquoSoliton solutions by Darboux transformation for aHamiltonian lattice systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 373 no 7 pp741ndash748 2009
[30] X Wu W Rui and X Hong ldquoA new discrete integrable systemderived from a generalized Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy and itsDarboux transformationrdquo Discrete Dynamics in Nature andSociety vol 2012 Article ID 652076 19 pages 2012
[31] W XMa ldquoDarboux transformations for a lax integrable systemin 2n dimensionsrdquo Letters in Mathematical Physics vol 39 no1 pp 33ndash49 1997
[32] W X Ma ldquoThe algebraic structure of zero curvature repre-sentations and application to coupled KdV systemsrdquo Journal ofPhysics A vol 26 no 11 pp 2573ndash2582 1993
[33] R Camassa and D D Holm ldquoAn integrable shallow waterequation with peaked solitonsrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 71no 11 pp 1661ndash1664 1993
[34] G B Whitham Linear and Nonlinear Waves Wiley New YorkNY USA 1974
[35] B Fuchssteiner and A S Fokas ldquoSymplectic structures theirBacklund transformations and hereditary symmetriesrdquo PhysicaD vol 4 no 1 pp 47ndash66 1981
[36] B Fuchssteiner ldquoThe Lie algebra structure of nonlinear evolu-tion equations admitting infinite dimensional abelian symme-try groupsrdquoProgress ofTheoretical Physics vol 65 no 3 pp 861ndash876 1981
[37] A S Fokas and P M Santini ldquoAn inverse acoustic problem andlinearization of moderate amplitude dispersive wavesrdquo 1994
[38] A S Fokas ldquoOn a class of physically important integrableequationsrdquo Physica D vol 87 no 1ndash4 pp 145ndash150 1995
[39] Q Bi ldquoWave patterns associated with a singular line for a bi-Hamiltonian systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 369 no 5-6 pp407ndash417 2007
[40] J Li and J Zhang ldquoBifurcations of travelling wave solutions forthe generalization form of the modified KdV equationrdquo ChaosSolitons and Fractals vol 21 no 4 pp 899ndash913 2004
[41] W Rui B He Y Long and C Chen ldquoThe integral bifurcationmethod and its application for solving a family of third-orderdispersive PDEsrdquo Nonlinear Analysis Theory Methods andApplications vol 69 no 4 pp 1256ndash1267 2008
[42] W Rui C Chen X Yang and Y Long ldquoSome new soliton-like solutions and periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop to a generalized KdV equationrdquo Applied Mathematics andComputation vol 217 no 4 pp 1666ndash1677 2010
[43] Y Long and C Chen ldquoExistence analysis of traveling wavesolutions for a generalization of KdV equationrdquo MathematicalProblems in Engineering vol 2013 Article ID 462957 7 pages2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
8 Mathematical Problems in Engineering
[14] X Lu B Tian H Q Zhang T Xu and H Li ldquoGener-alized (2+1)-dimensional Gardner model bilinear equationsBacklund transformation Lax representation and interactionmechanismsrdquoNonlinearDynamics vol 67 no 3 pp 2279ndash22902012
[15] X L Gai Y T Gao L Wang et al ldquoPainleve property Laxpair and Darboux transformation of the variable-coefficientmodified Kortweg-de Vries model in fluid-filled elastic tubesrdquoCommunications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simula-tion vol 16 no 4 pp 1776ndash1782 2011
[16] J Avan and A Doikou ldquoBoundary Lax pairs for the An(1) Todafield theoriesrdquo Nuclear Physics B vol 821 no 3 pp 481ndash5052009
[17] Y He and H W Tam ldquoBilinear Backlund transformationand Lax pair for a coupled Ramani equationrdquo Journal ofMathematical Analysis and Applications vol 357 no 1 pp 132ndash136 2009
[18] H Q Zhang B Tian X H Meng X Lu and W Liu ldquoConser-vation laws soliton solutions and modulational instability forthe higher-order dispersive nonlinear Schrodinger equationrdquoEuropean Physical Journal B vol 72 no 2 pp 233ndash239 2009
[19] X Yu Y T Gao Z Y Sun and Y Liu ldquoWronskian solutionsand integrability for a generalized variable-coefficient forcedKorteweg-de Vries equation in fluidsrdquoNonlinear Dynamics vol67 no 2 pp 1023ndash1030 2012
[20] HQ Zhang B Tian L L Li andY Xue ldquoDarboux transforma-tion and soliton solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinearSchrodinger hierarchy with symbolic computationrdquo Physica Avol 388 no 1 pp 9ndash20 2009
[21] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[22] V B Matveev and M A Salle ldquoScattering of solitons inthe formalism of the Darboux transformrdquo Journal of SovietMathematics vol 34 no 5 pp 1983ndash1987 1986
[23] X Geng and H W Tam ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equationsrdquoJournal of the Physical Society of Japan vol 68 no 5 pp 1508ndash1512 1999
[24] Y Li W X Ma and J E Zhang ldquoDarboux transformationsof classical Boussinesq system and its new solutionsrdquo PhysicsLetters A vol 275 no 1-2 pp 60ndash66 2000
[25] X Li and A Chen ldquoDarboux transformation and multi-solitonsolutions of Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquo Physics Letters Avol 342 no 5-6 pp 413ndash420 2005
[26] A Chen and X Li ldquoDarboux transformation and solitonsolutions for Boussinesq-Burgers equationrdquoChaos Solitons andFractals vol 27 no 1 pp 43ndash49 2006
[27] D Levi ldquoOn a new Darboux transformation for the construc-tion of exact solutions of the Schrodinger equationrdquo InverseProblems vol 4 no 1 pp 165ndash172 1988
[28] Z B Zhaqilao and Z Li ldquoDarboux transformation and bidi-rectional soliton solutions of a new (2 + 1)-dimensional solitonequationrdquo Physics Letters A vol 372 no 9 pp 1422ndash1428 2008
[29] H X Yang ldquoSoliton solutions by Darboux transformation for aHamiltonian lattice systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 373 no 7 pp741ndash748 2009
[30] X Wu W Rui and X Hong ldquoA new discrete integrable systemderived from a generalized Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchy and itsDarboux transformationrdquo Discrete Dynamics in Nature andSociety vol 2012 Article ID 652076 19 pages 2012
[31] W XMa ldquoDarboux transformations for a lax integrable systemin 2n dimensionsrdquo Letters in Mathematical Physics vol 39 no1 pp 33ndash49 1997
[32] W X Ma ldquoThe algebraic structure of zero curvature repre-sentations and application to coupled KdV systemsrdquo Journal ofPhysics A vol 26 no 11 pp 2573ndash2582 1993
[33] R Camassa and D D Holm ldquoAn integrable shallow waterequation with peaked solitonsrdquo Physical Review Letters vol 71no 11 pp 1661ndash1664 1993
[34] G B Whitham Linear and Nonlinear Waves Wiley New YorkNY USA 1974
[35] B Fuchssteiner and A S Fokas ldquoSymplectic structures theirBacklund transformations and hereditary symmetriesrdquo PhysicaD vol 4 no 1 pp 47ndash66 1981
[36] B Fuchssteiner ldquoThe Lie algebra structure of nonlinear evolu-tion equations admitting infinite dimensional abelian symme-try groupsrdquoProgress ofTheoretical Physics vol 65 no 3 pp 861ndash876 1981
[37] A S Fokas and P M Santini ldquoAn inverse acoustic problem andlinearization of moderate amplitude dispersive wavesrdquo 1994
[38] A S Fokas ldquoOn a class of physically important integrableequationsrdquo Physica D vol 87 no 1ndash4 pp 145ndash150 1995
[39] Q Bi ldquoWave patterns associated with a singular line for a bi-Hamiltonian systemrdquo Physics Letters A vol 369 no 5-6 pp407ndash417 2007
[40] J Li and J Zhang ldquoBifurcations of travelling wave solutions forthe generalization form of the modified KdV equationrdquo ChaosSolitons and Fractals vol 21 no 4 pp 899ndash913 2004
[41] W Rui B He Y Long and C Chen ldquoThe integral bifurcationmethod and its application for solving a family of third-orderdispersive PDEsrdquo Nonlinear Analysis Theory Methods andApplications vol 69 no 4 pp 1256ndash1267 2008
[42] W Rui C Chen X Yang and Y Long ldquoSome new soliton-like solutions and periodic wave solutions with loop or withoutloop to a generalized KdV equationrdquo Applied Mathematics andComputation vol 217 no 4 pp 1666ndash1677 2010
[43] Y Long and C Chen ldquoExistence analysis of traveling wavesolutions for a generalization of KdV equationrdquo MathematicalProblems in Engineering vol 2013 Article ID 462957 7 pages2013
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of