new lead-based paint inspection and risk...
TRANSCRIPT
Asbestos Survey
& Lead-Based Paint Inspection/Risk Assessment Report
Fourplex
861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130 Property
BB Housing Associates
(651) 260-5528
Property Owner & Phone Number
Submitted to: BB Housing Associates
Submitted by: Environmental Health Testing Services 2811 Texas Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 Certified Lead Firm: License No: LF3281
Submittal Date: September 12, 2013
EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Environmental Health Testing Services 2811 Texas Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN • Phone: (952) 297-5169 E-mail: [email protected] • Website: [email protected]
September 12, 2013
Attn: Mr. Michael Buelow BB Housing Associates 1645 Palace Avenue St. Paul, MN 55105 RE: Asbestos Sampling Survey, & Lead-Based Paint Inspection/Assessment Fourplex, 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55130 Dear Mr. Buelow:
In accordance with your authorization, we conducted a pre-renovation asbestos survey and a lead-based paint inspection and risk assessment for the above-referenced property. The purpose of this survey was to identify building materials with asbestos and/or lead-based paints in preparation for renovation work at the above-reference property. Items surveyed for this project included building components planned to be disturbed during the renovation. Please refer to the attached report for the scope, methods and conclusions of our survey. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our professional services to you for this project. If you have any questions regarding this or the attached report, I may be contacted at 952.297-5169.
Sincerely,
Kristine Stahl, Consultant
Contents
1.0 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Project Scope ..................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 Site Description ................................................................................................................ 2
4.0 Asbestos Survey ............................................................................................................... 2
5.0 Lead-Based Paint Inspection/ Risk Assessment (PIRA) ........................................... 4
6.0 Additional Pre-Renovation Items of Concern ............................................................ 6
7.0 Closure ............................................................................................................................... 6
Appendices
A: Figures
B: MDH Inspector Certifications and Laboratory Certificates
C: TABLE 1: Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials
D: Standard Operating Procedures for Lead Paint Inspections and Risk Assessments
E: TABLE 2: Downloaded XRF Readings (Lead Analysis)
F: TABLES 3 and 4: Summary of Lead Dust Analytical Results
G: TABLE 5: Lead Hazard Reduction Options
H: Table 6: Maintenance/Monitoring Schedule
I: Disclosure
J: Analytical Laboratory Reports (Asbestos and Lead Analysis)
1.0 Executive Summary
A pre-renovation asbestos survey and a lead-based paint inspection/risk assessment have been
completed of the vacant fourplex located at 861 and 863 Burr Street, Ramsey County, Minnesota
(Site.) Based on our visual observations and our evaluation of analytical data, we conclude the
following:
The following materials meet the definition of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) per the
results of our survey:
functional space material description asbestos content approximate quantity
unit 863 - 2nd level kitchen gold vinyl linoleum 20% 200 s.f.
The following materials meet the definition of containing lead-based paints per the results of
our survey:
UNIT ROOM/AREA COMPONENT
exterior white wood window casings (side A only),
gray wood porch ceiling,
861 1st floor bathroom white ceramic tile baseboards,
861 2nd floor bathroom beige metal tub,
861 2nd floor stairway to attic white wood stair stringer,
863
common entry and front stairway
white wood stringer,
blue stair treads and risers,
white vinyl floor,
863 1st floor bathroom yellow ceramic wall tile,
white ceramic tile baseboards,
863 1st floor stairway to basement
white wood ledge (side B),
863 2nd floor bathroom white ceramic tile tub surround, and
white ceramic tile baseboards.
The Pre-Renovation and Demolition Rule (Minn. R. 7035.0805.) requires solid wastes, hazardous
wastes, oil, tanks, appliances, and any components or items with loose or peeling lead-based
paints, mercury, asbestos (depending on the type and condition), Chlorofluorocarbons and/or
poly-chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to be removed prior to renovation or demolition.
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013
EHTS Project Number: 080-13
2
2.0 Project Scope The purpose of this survey included the following:
to identify and sample suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and to provide
information regarding the identity, location, and approximate quantities of analytically-
confirmed ACMs in preparation for renovation of the fourplex; and
to conduct a lead-based paint inspection/ risk assessment. A lead-based paint
inspection is a surface-by-surface investigation to determine the presence of lead-based
paint. A risk assessment involves evaluating a dwelling for lead-based paint hazards,
and if present, providing lead hazard reduction options.
3.0 Site Description The subject site is located at 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota (Site).
The parcel identification (PID) for the Site is 29-29-22-31-0161. At the time of this survey, the
structure at the Site included a vacant 1884- wood-frame-constructed two-story fourplex with a
basement foundation. A Site location map and a Site sketch of the floor plans are shown on
Figures 1 and 2, respectively (Figures, Appendix A).
Building materials within the fourplex appeared of similar age, of similar construction, and of
similar materials. Building materials within the units consisted of dry-wall walls and ceilings,
wood and vinyl window components, wood and metal door components, wood baseboards,
vinyl flooring, tile flooring, carpeted flooring and fiberglass wall and attic insulation.
4.0 Asbestos Survey
Asbestos Bulk Sampling Results
The Site was surveyed for asbestos-containing materials (ACM) on August 23, 2013 by Kristine
Stahl, Certified Asbestos Inspector #AI8690 ( MDH Inspector Certifications and Laboratory
Certificate, Appendix B), in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health Asbestos
Abatement Rules (MR Chapter 4620), and the Pre-Renovation and Demolition Rule (Minn. R.
7035.0805.)
Bulk sampling was performed in general accordance with the sampling protocols established in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFRJ) 40, Section 763, Subpart E. Sampling within the
structure included the collection of ceiling, wall, flooring materials, and the exterior siding.
The bulk samples collected for laboratory asbestos analysis were submitted to Environmental
Hazards Services, an accredited NVLAP laboratory for analysis using polarized light
microscopy (EPA 600/R-93/116 Method.) Laboratory analysis results indicate the presence of
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013
EHTS Project Number: 080-13
3
asbestos (an asbestos content of more than one percent (1%) in the following materials surveyed
for this project:
functional space material description asbestos content approximate quantity
unit 863 - 2nd level kitchen gold vinyl linoleum 20% 200 s.f.
Additional sampling information is summarized on Table 1 (Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-
Containing Materials Surveyed, Appendix C), the approximate sampling locations of flooring
materials are shown on Figures 2 (Figures, Appendix A), and the laboratory analytical report is
attached to this report. Ceiling and walls materials at the Site consisted of drywall and
appeared homogeneous throughout the fourplex.
Discussion
Asbestos abatement should be performed by properly trained abatement contractors using
appropriate controls to prevent fiber emissions during the removal process. Workers
performing removal should be properly protected to prevent exposure, including the use of
respiratory protection with HEPA filtration. Asbestos containing waste materials should be
properly contained and transported for offsite disposal at a properly permitted facility. The
contractor conducting abatement work is responsible for complying with local, state, and
federal standards for worker protection and NESHAP regulations regarding asbestos fiber
emissions.
The MPCA and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) must be notified of asbestos-
related work. A “Notification of Asbestos-Related Work” must be submitted to the MPCA and
Minnesota Department of Health prior to asbestos abatement work.
The MPCA must be notified of demolition work. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA) must be notified with a “Notification of Intent to Perform a Demolition” ten working
days prior to the start date of a demolition project. All materials regulated under the Pre-
Renovation and Demolition Rule, including RACM, building components with peeling lead-
based paints and all other items prohibited from being deposited in a landfill, must be removed
from the structure two days prior to the start date that was submitted for the notification.
Limitations Statement
Asbestos was widely used until the late 1970’s in thousands of building materials, making it
difficult to locate all areas of ACM usage. This assessment reflects the data collected from the
specific locations tested to identify ACM in those locations and may not be all encompassing.
There is always potential for asbestos containing materials to be missed due to problems with
accessibility, and the broad variety of uses. The conclusions and recommendations within this
report are based on current regulations and the professional experience of the certified
professionals involved in this project.
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013
EHTS Project Number: 080-13
4
5.0 Lead-Based Paint Inspection/ Risk Assessment (PIRA) This project included a lead-based paint inspection and risk assessment. Additional
information on statues, rules, and protocols used for this inspection are described in the
Standard Operating Procedures for Lead-Based Paint Inspections, Appendix D attached to this
report.
The on-site lead-based paint inspection/ risk assessment was conducted on September 4, 2013
and involved testing surfaces using an X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) to determine
lead concentrations. Interior sampling included the ceilings, the walls, the window
components, the door components, the cabinets, the stair components, two tubs, the baseboards,
and the flooring. Exterior sampling included the siding, the window components, the door
components, the front porch and the fascia.
The XRF results indicated lead-based paints (a lead concentration above the action level of 1.0
mg/cm2) are present on the following:
UNIT ROOM/AREA COMPONENT
exterior white wood window casings (side A only),
gray wood porch ceiling,
861 1st floor bathroom white ceramic tile baseboards,
861 2nd floor bathroom beige metal tub,
861 2nd floor stairway to attic white wood stair stringer,
863
common entry and front stairway
white wood stringer,
blue stair treads and risers,
white vinyl floor,
863 1st floor bathroom yellow ceramic wall tile,
white ceramic tile baseboards,
863 1st floor stairway to basement
white wood ledge (side B),
863 2nd floor bathroom white ceramic tile tub surround, and
white ceramic tile baseboards.
The XRF testing locations and results are summarized on Table 2 (Downloaded XRF Readings,
Appendix E.)
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013
EHTS Project Number: 080-13
5
To further screen for lead risk hazards, six dust wipe samples were collected from each unit at
the Site and submitted to Accurate Analytical Testing, an accredited laboratory. The results of
the following dust wipe samples indicated lead levels above HUD and the Minnesota
Department of Health (MDH) standards for lead in dust:
unit 861, first-floor front living room entry floor,
unit 863 first-floor entry floor (near kitchen), and
unit 863 first-floor bedroom floor.
A summary of the dust wipe and collection with the analytical results for each unit are
summarized on Tables 3 thru 6 (Summary of Laboratory Analytical Results, Appendix F), and
copies of the laboratory reports are attached to this report.
Soil sampling was not required for this project, since the ground surface at the Site was covered
with vegetation and mulch with no bare soil noted around the foundation of the home or in the
yard at the time of this inspection.
Recommended lead hazard control measures and a reevaluation schedule are provided on
Tables 7 and 8, respectively (Lead Hazard Reduction Options, Appendix G and
Maintenance/Monitoring Schedule, Appendix H.) In general, all painted surfaces should be
monitored. A negative result does not necessarily indicate that no lead is present in that
surface, but rather indicates that any lead present in that surface is below the 1.0 mg/cm2
threshold in the area tested. Therefore, all painted surfaces should be maintained in intact
condition.
Based on the findings of the lead-based paint survey, lead safe work practices should be
followed if building components identified with lead-based paints above are disturbed. Painted
surface to be disturbed means a paint surface that is to be scraped, sanded, cut, penetrated or otherwise
affected by rehabilitation work in a manner that could potentially create a lead-based paint hazard by
generating dust, fumes, or paint chips (24 CFR § 35.110 Definitions.) Lead Safe Certified contractors
should use extreme care and lead safe work practices should be followed during the
rehabilitation work.
All available records and reports concerning lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards
are required to be disclosed to purchasers and tenants at the time of sale or lease or upon lease
renewal. Disclosure Information is attached to this report (Disclosure Information, Appendix I).
This lead inspection/risk assessment report should be kept by the inspector and all future
owners for the life of the structure.
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013
EHTS Project Number: 080-13
6
6.0 Additional Pre-Renovation Items of Concern
The Pre-Renovation and Demolition Rule (Minn. R. 7035.0805.) requires solid wastes, hazardous
wastes, oil, tanks, appliances, and any components or items with loose or peeling lead-based
paints, mercury, asbestos (depending on the type and condition), Chlorofluorocarbons and/or
poly-chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to be recycled or properly disposed of prior to renovation or
demolition.
7.0 Closure
We appreciate the opportunity in providing environmental services for your project. If
additional information or assistance is needed, I may be reached at 952-297-5169.
ENVIORONMENTAL HEALTH TESTING SERVICES, LLC
Prepared by:
Kristine Stahl, Consultant
MN-Licensed Asbestos Inspector, #AI8690
MN-Licensed Lead Risk Assessor, #LR944
7
Figure1 Site Location Map
Fourplex, 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota 55130
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix C:
Inventory of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials Surveyed
N.D. – not detected
TABLE 1
Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials Surveyed Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota 55130
Sample #
Area Sampled Material color and description
Friable?
Homogenous areas
Material Category
Asbestos Content
Notes
S-1 861 – main-level kitchen ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D
S-2 861 main-level bedroom ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D.
S-3 863 main-level living room ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D.
S-4 863 main-level bedroom ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D.
S-5 863 2nd-level living room ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D.
S-6 863 2nd level bedroom ceiling – popcorn n throughout surf N.D.
S-7 861 2nd level kitchen ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D.
S-8 861 2nd level bathroom ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D.
S-9 2nd level common hall ceiling - popcorn n throughout surf N.D.
S-10 361 main-level living room wall – drywall n throughout surf N.D.
S-11 361 main-level hallway wall - drywall n throughout misc N.D.
S-12 2nd level common hall wall - drywall n throughout misc N.D.
S-13 861 main-level entrance floor - tan & white vinyl tiles n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-14 861 main-level living room floor -brown laminate n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-15 863 main-level entry floor - brown vinyl tiles n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-16 863 main-level bathroom floor -- small yellow ceramic tiles n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-17 common area hall and stairs floor - white vinyl tiles n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-18 863 2nd level kitchen floor - gold linoleum n see Figure 2 misc 18%
S-19 863 2nd floor bathroom floor - small white ceramic tile n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-20 861 2nd floor bathroom floor - small beige ceramic tile n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-21 861 main-level entry floor & mastic - underlying beige ceramic tile
n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-22 861 main-level living room floor & mastic - underlying tan vinyl n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-23 861 main-level kitchen floor & mastic - underlying tan ceramic tile
n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-24 863 2nd level bathroom baseboard mastic - white n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-25 861 – basement fibrous window material n see Figure 2 misc N.D.
S-26 attic attic - orange foam-like insulation y tsi N.D.
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix C:
Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials
18
TABLE 1
Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials Surveyed Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota 55130
Sample #
Area Sampled Material color and description
Friable?
Homogenous areas
Material Category
Asbestos Content
Notes
around access door to roof
S-27 exterior siding - gray fibrous material n throughout misc N.D.
S-28 exterior siding - underlying white asphalt material
n throughout misc N.D.
S-29 exterior siding - underlying black asphalt material
n throughout misc N.D.
Material Category tsi = thermal system insulation, surf = surfacing material, misc – miscellaneous material
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix C:
Inventory of Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials
19
Table 1 Definitions
Asbestos-containing material or ACM. Asbestos-containing material or ACM is defined by the asbestos
NESHAP as any material containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos as determined using Polarized Light
Microscopy (PLM.)
Asbestos-containing building material (ACBM). Surfacing ACM, thermal system insulation ACM, or
miscellaneous ACM that is found in or on interior structural members or other parts of a building.
Friable asbestos material. “Friable asbestos material” means any material containing more than one percent
asbestos by microscopic visual estimation by area, that hand pressure can crumble, pulverize, or reduce to
powder when dry. Friable asbestos material includes previously nonfriable asbestos material which becomes
damaged to the extent that when dry all or a portion of the material may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced
to powder by hand pressure.
Homogeneous area. “Homogeneous area” means an area of surfacing materials, thermal system insulation
materials, flooring, or other miscellaneous materials which upon examination for properties such as age, color,
and texture appear to be composed of the same material.
Functional Space. A room, group of rooms, or homogeneous area (including crawl spaces or the space
between a dropped ceiling and the floor or roof deck above), such as classroom(s), a cafeteria, gymnasium,
hallway(s), designated by a person accredited to prepare management plans, design abatement projects, or
conduct response actions.
Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RACM)
Miscellaneous material. Interior building materials on structural components, structural members or fixtures,
such as floor and ceilings tiles and does not include surfacing material or thermal system insulation.
Nonfriable material. Material when dry may not be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand
pressure.
Surfacing Material. Material in a building that is sprayed-on, troweled-on, or otherwise applied to surfaces,
such as acoustical plaster on ceilings or fireproofing materials on structural members, or other materials on
surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing, or other purposes.
Thermal system insulation. Material in a building applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, or
other interior structural components to prevent heat loss or gain, or water condensation, or for other
purposes.
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
35
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
1 4.93 cps 0
2 CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.2 mg / cm ^2 0.1 1.12
3 CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^2 0.1 1.09
4 CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.2 mg / cm ^2 0.2 1.15
5 EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD SIDING A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
6 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD SIDING trim A POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
7 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window A 1 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
8 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD FRAME window A 1 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
9 EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL FRAME window A 2 INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
10 EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL FRAME window A 2 INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
11 EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL FRAME window A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
12 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window A 2 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.03 1.59
13 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window A 3 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
14 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window A 4 FAIR Positive 4.6 mg / cm ^2 2.7 6.12
15 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD FRAME window A 4 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
16 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD porch posts A 4 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
17 EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD porch floor A 4 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
18 EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD porch ceiling A 4 INTACT Positive 4.8 mg / cm ^2 2.1 10
19 EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL DOOR A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
20 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING door A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
36
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
21 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING door A 2 INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.29
22 EXTERIOR WHITE VINYL DOOR A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
23 EXTERIOR RED METAL DOOR A 2 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
24 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD JAMB door A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
25 EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD SIDING B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
26 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD SIDING trim B POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
27 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 1 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
28 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 2 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
29 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 3 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
30 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 4 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
31 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 5 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
32 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window B 6 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
33 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD WELL WINDOW B 7 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
34 EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD SIDING C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
35 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window C 1 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
36 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window C 2 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
37 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD WELL WINDOW C 3 POOR Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.04 2.41
38 EXTERIOR RED METAL DOOR C FAIR Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.05 1.84
39 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING door C POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
40 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD JAMB door C POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
41 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD railing C POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
37
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
42 EXTERIOR GRAY WOOD SIDING D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.04 2.12
43 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD SIDING trim D POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
44 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window D 1 FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
45 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window D 2 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
46 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window D 3 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
47 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD CASING window D 4 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
48 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD WELL WINDOW D 5 POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
49 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD FASCIA A FAIR Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.05 2.38
50 EXTERIOR WHITE WOOD FASCIA A FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
51 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
52 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
53 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
54 861 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
55 861 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD FRAME window A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
56 861 1st LIVING ROOM RED METAL DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
57 861 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.03 1.81
58 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door A FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
59 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
60 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
61 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD DOOR C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
62 861 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
38
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
63 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
64 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
65 861 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
66 861 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
67 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
68 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
69 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
70 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
71 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
72 861 1st KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CABINET B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
73 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
74 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.08
75 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
76 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
77 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.1
78 861 1st KITCHEN WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.82
79 861 1st HALL WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
80 861 1st HALL WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
81 861 1st HALL WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^2 0.4 1
82 861 1st HALL BROWN WOOD DOOR B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
83 861 1st HALL BROWN WOOD CASING door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
39
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
84 861 1st HALL BROWN WOOD JAMB door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
85 861 1st HALL WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
86 861 1st HALL WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
87 861 1st HALL BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.05 1.65
88 861 1st HALL BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.03 mg / cm ^2 0.09 3.7
89 861 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
90 861 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
91 861 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
92 861 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
93 861 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
94 861 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
95 861 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD FRAME window B INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.05 2.35
96 861 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.4
97 861 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
98 861 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
99 861 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
100 861 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD JAMB door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
101 861 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
102 861 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
103 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
104 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.55
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
40
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
105 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
106 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
107 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
108 861 1st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
109 861 1st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD FRAME window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
110 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
111 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE VINYL TUB C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
112 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE VINYL TUB SURROUND C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
113 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
114 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
115 861 1st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
116 861 1st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.03 1
117 861 1st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
118 861 1st BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile BASEBOARD A INTACT Positive 1.8 mg / cm ^2 0.6 1.96
119 861 1st BATHROOM BLUE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.15
120 861 1st BATHROOM BLUE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 4.84
121 861 1st BEDROOM 2 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
122 861 1st BEDROOM 2 BLUE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.26
123 861 1st BEDROOM 2 WHITE VINYL DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
124 861 1st BEDROOM 2 BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
125 861 1st BEDROOM 2 BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
41
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
126 861 1st BEDROOM 2 BLUE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
127 861 1st BEDROOM 2 BROWN WOOD DOOR B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
128 861 1st BEDROOM 2 WHITE WOOD CASING door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
129 861 1st BEDROOM 2 WHITE WOOD JAMB door B POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
130 861 1st BEDROOM 2 WHITE DRYWALL CLOSET WALL B FAIR Negative 0.03 mg / cm ^2 0.06 6.62
131 861 1st BEDROOM 2 WHITE DRYWALL CLOSET CEILING POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.52
132 861 1st BEDROOM 2 BLUE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
133 861 1st BEDROOM 2 WHITE WOOD CASING window C POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
134 861 1st BEDROOM 2 BROWN WOOD FRAME window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
135 861 1st BEDROOM 2 BLUE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
136 861 1st BEDROOM 2 WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
137 861 1st HALL stairs common WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.39
138 861 1st HALL stairs common WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
139 861 1st HALL stairs common WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
140 861 1st HALL stairs common WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.12
141 861 1st HALL stairs common RED METAL DOOR C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
142 861 1st HALL stairs common BROWN WOOD CASING door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
143 861 1st HALL stairs common BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
144 861 1st HALL stairs common WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
145 861 1st HALL stairs common BLUE TREAD STAIRS INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
146 861 1st HALL stairs common BLUE RISER STAIRS INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
42
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
147 861 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^2 0.4 1.15
148 861 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.67
149 861 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
150 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
151 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
152 861 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.45
153 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
154 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD FRAME window B INTACT Negative 0.02 mg / cm ^2 0.07 2.67
155 861 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD TROUGH window B POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
156 861 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
157 861 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.23
158 861 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
159 861 2nd LIVING ROOM GRAY METAL DOOR D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
160 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
161 861 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
162 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
163 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
164 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
165 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.33
166 861 2nd LIVING ROOM BLACK CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
167 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.04 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
43
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
168 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.6 mg / cm ^2 0.3 2.36
169 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 3.11
170 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING window A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
171 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD TROUGH window A POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
172 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
173 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.48
174 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR C 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
175 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING door C 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
176 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD CASING door C 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
177 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD JAMB door C 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
178 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD DOOR C 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
179 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
180 861 2nd BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
181 861 2nd KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 4.23
182 861 2nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
183 861 2nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CASING window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
184 861 2nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD TROUGH window B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
185 861 2nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
186 861 2nd KITCHEN BEIGE CERAMIC tile WALL C INTACT Negative 0.02 mg / cm ^2 0.05 1
187 861 2nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CABINET C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
188 861 2nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
44
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
189 861 2nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
190 861 2nd KITCHEN WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
191 861 2nd BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
192 861 2nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
193 861 2nd BATHROOM BEIGE CERAMIC tile WALL A INTACT Positive 2.2 mg / cm ^2 0.7 2.08
194 861 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
195 861 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.23
196 861 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
197 861 2nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
198 861 2nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.03 3.43
199 861 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
200 861 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD SILL window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
201 861 2nd BATHROOM BEIGE METAL TUB C INTACT Positive 27.4 mg / cm ^2 7.1 1.83
202 861 2nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.72
203 861 2nd BATHROOM BEIGE CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.06 mg / cm ^2 0.19 5.1
204 861 2nd stairs attic WHITE WOOD railing INTACT Negative 0.07 mg / cm ^2 0.18 3.73
205 861 2nd stairs attic WHITE WOOD STRINGER STAIR INTACT Positive 1.4 mg / cm ^2 0.3 3.59
206 861 2nd stairs attic WHITE WOOD WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
207 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^2 0.3 1.11
208 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.42
209 863 2nd common stairs front BROWN WOOD WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
45
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
210 863 2nd common stairs front BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
211 863 2nd common stairs front BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
212 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
213 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
214 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
215 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE WOOD railng D POOR Negative 0.08 mg / cm ^2 0.15 3.08
216 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE WOOD STRINGER STAIR B POOR Positive 20.1 mg / cm ^2 5.4 6.29
217 863 2nd common stairs front BLUE TREAD STAIRS INTACT Positive 6.1 mg / cm ^2 2.4 1.47
218 863 2nd common stairs front BLUE RISER STAIRS INTACT Positive 3.7 mg / cm ^2 1.5 10
219 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Positive 1.7 mg / cm ^2 0.6 2.73
220 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Null 0.06 mg / cm ^2 0.07 4.43
221 863 2nd common stairs front WHITE VINYL FLOOR INTACT Positive 1.8 mg / cm ^2 0.6 5.09
222 863 2nd stairs attic BROWN TREAD STAIRS INTACT Negative 0.05 mg / cm ^2 0.17 5.83
223 863 2nd stairs attic BROWN RISER STAIRS INTACT Negative 0.27 mg / cm ^2 0.64 3.66
224 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.73
225 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
226 863 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.04 1.65
227 863 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD SILL window A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
228 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
229 863 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR B 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
230 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD CASING door B 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
46
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
231 863 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door B 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
232 863 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR B 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
233 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD CASING door B 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
234 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door B 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
235 863 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR B 3 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
236 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD CASING door B 3 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
237 863 1st LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door B 3 INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.05 2.1
238 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C 3 INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
239 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C 3 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
240 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.03 3.49
241 863 1st LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
242 863 1st KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
243 863 1st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.49
244 863 1st KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CABINET A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
245 863 1st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
246 863 1st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
247 863 1st KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
248 863 1st KITCHEN WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
249 863 1st KITCHEN BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^2 0.2 4.35
250 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.77
251 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0.7 mg / cm ^2 0.3 1.09
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
47
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
252 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
253 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
254 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
255 863 1st BATHROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
256 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE WOOD CASING door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
257 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
258 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
259 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.07
260 863 1st BATHROOM YELLOW CERAMIC tile WALL C INTACT Positive 1.8 mg / cm ^2 0.6 1.86
261 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE METAL TUB C INTACT Negative -0.08 mg / cm ^2 0.76 2.47
262 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.95
263 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE WOOD CASING window D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
264 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE WOOD SILL window D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
265 863 1st BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile BASEBOARD D INTACT Positive 1.7 mg / cm ^2 0.5 1.99
266 863 1st BATHROOM YELLOW CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Null 0.02 mg / cm ^2 0.03 2.2
267 863 1st BATHROOM YELLOW CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.02 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.06
268 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.24
269 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
270 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD DOOR A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
271 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD CASING door A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
272 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD JAMB door A 1 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
48
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
273 863 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR A 2 INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
274 863 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD DOOR A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
275 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD CASING door A 2 INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
276 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.14
277 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.39
278 863 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN WOOD FRAME window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
279 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD CASING window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
280 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
281 863 1st BEDROOM 1 WHITE WOOD BASEBOARD A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
282 863 1st BEDROOM 1 BROWN VINYL FLOOR INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
283 863 1st STAIRWAY BASEMENT BEIGE VINYL TREAD STAIRS INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
284 863 1st STAIRWAY BASEMENT BEIGE VINYL RISER STAIRS FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
285 863 1st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
286 863 1st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 3.27
287 863 1st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.75
288 863 1st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE WOOD WALL B INTACT Positive 5.8 mg / cm ^2 2.4 9.24
289 863 1st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
290 863 1st STAIRWAY BASEMENT WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
291 863 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
292 863 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
293 863 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
49
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
294 863 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
295 863 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
296 863 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
297 863 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE METAL DOOR B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
298 863 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door B INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
299 863 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
300 863 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD JAMB door B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
301 863 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 2.5
302 863 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
303 863 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
304 863 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
305 863 2nd LIVING ROOM WHITE WOOD TROUGH window D POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
306 863 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
307 863 2nd LIVING ROOM BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
308 863 2nd KITCHEN WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
309 863 2nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CABINET A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
310 863 2nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
311 863 2nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
312 863 2nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD CASING window C INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.31
313 863 2nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD SILL window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
314 863 2nd KITCHEN WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.35
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
50
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
315 863 2nd KITCHEN BROWN WOOD BASEBOARD B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
316 863 2nd KITCHEN BEIGE LINOLEUM FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.03 1.24
317 863 2nd BATHROOM WHITE PLASTER CEILING INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
318 863 2nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
319 863 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD DOOR A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
320 863 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING door A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
321 863 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD JAMB door A INTACT Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.03 1.27
322 863 2nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
323 863 2nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
324 863 2nd BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile TUB SURROUND C INTACT Positive 2.3 mg / cm ^2 0.7 2.14
325 863 2nd BATHROOM WHITE METAL TUB C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
326 863 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD CASING window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
327 863 2nd BATHROOM BROWN WOOD SILL window C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1.16
328 863 2nd BATHROOM WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
329 863 2nd BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile BASEBOARD B INTACT Positive 2.5 mg / cm ^2 0.8 2.07
330 863 2nd BATHROOM WHITE CERAMIC tile FLOOR INTACT Negative 0.08 mg / cm ^2 0.11 1.83
331 863 2nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE DRYWALL WALL B INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
332 863 2nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Null 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
333 863 2nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE DRYWALL WALL C INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
334 863 2nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE DRYWALL WALL D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
335 863 2nd STAIRWAY ATTIC WHITE WOOD STRINGER STAIR D INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
51
TABLE 2 Downloaded XRF Readings
Fourplex – 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Date and Time of XRF Readings: September 4, 2013; 10:09 – 12:48
Niton, Serial # 25591, Source Model: XLp 300A
Source and Age of XRF Device: Cd 109-40mCi, 4/15/13, NIST SRM Number: 2573.
No. UNIT FLOOR ROOM/AREA COLOR SUBSTRATE COMPONENT SIDE # CONDITION Results PbC Units PbC Error Depth Index
336 863 2nd STAIRWAY ATTIC PURPLE TREAD STAIRS INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
337 863 2nd STAIRWAY ATTIC PURPLE RISER STAIRS INTACT Negative 0.16 mg / cm ^2 0.11 5.03
338 CALIBRATION CHECK INTACT Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^2 0.1 1.12
339 CALIBRATION CHECK INTACT Null 1.1 mg / cm ^2 0.1 1.11
340 CALIBRATION CHECK INTACT Positive 1.2 mg / cm ^2 0.1 1.17
341 CALIBRATION CHECK INTACT Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^2 0.1 1.07
342 GARAGE GRAY VINYL SIDING A INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^2 0.3 1
343 GARAGE WHITE WOOD DOOR A POOR Negative 0.01 mg / cm ^2 0.05 2.55
344 GARAGE WHITE WOOD CASING door A FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
345 GARAGE WHITE WOOD SOFFIT A POOR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
346 GARAGE BEIGE VINYL SIDING A INTACT Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
347 GARAGE BEIGE VINYL SIDING C INTACT Negative 0.5 mg / cm ^2 0.4 1
348 GARAGE GRAY WOOD SIDING D FAIR Negative 0 mg / cm ^2 0.02 1
349 CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.2 mg / cm ^2 0.1 1.09
350 CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^2 0.1 1.06
351 CALIBRATION CHECK Positive 1.1 mg / cm ^2 0.1 1.09
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix E:
Downloaded XRF Readings
[Type text]
Table 2 Definitions
Components - Each room equivalent is made up of components. Components in a room include the
ceiling, floor, walls, a door and its casing, the window sash, and window casings, etc. In general, the
first occurrence of a component moving from corner to corner on each wall is tested, and represents
all components of that type in the room. If multiples of a component type are observed, the first
occurrence moving from corner to corner on each wall is labeled component 1, the second component
is labeled component 2, etc. (e.g. door 1, then door 2 or window 1, then window 2).
Substrate - The substrate is the material underneath the paint. Many substrates exist, however, the
HUD Final Guidelines recommend classifying substrates into one of six substrate types: brick,
concrete, drywall, metal, plaster, and wood. These substrate types are intended to include a broad
range of materials. If the true substrate is not one of the six types, the substrate that most closely
matches the true substrate is selected.
Side - Walls are listed in each room by letter with wall “A” being closest to the street of address,
proceeding clockwise to “B, C, D” etc. Multiple components (i.e. windows or doors) are listed
moving right to left along each external wall, and left to right on internal walls. E.g. moving from the
“D-A” corner to the “A-B” corner.
Condition – The condition of paint is evaluated as poor, fair, or intact.
Room - A room equivalent is identified as a room, a house exterior, a foyer, staircase, hallway, or an
exterior area. Closets or other similar areas adjoining rooms are not considered as separate room
equivalents unless they are obviously dissimilar from the adjoining room equivalent. Room
equivalents are generally listed by number, starting with the 1st room on the main entrance and
proceeding clockwise on each floor. Refer to drawings to confirm room number assignments.
Results - HUD and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines specify a
positive determination of lead in paint when the lead content is equal to or greater than 1.0 milligrams
of lead per square centimeter of painted surface (mg/cm2) when measured by X-ray Fluorescence
(XRF).
Depth Index – The depth index is a numerical value indicating the amount of non-leaded paint
covering the lead (if any) detected by the analyzer.
• A depth index of less than 1.5 indicates a reading very near the surface.
• A depth index between 1.6 and 4.0 indicates a moderate depth.
• A depth index of greater than 4.0 indicates a deeply buried reading.
PbC – Pb is the chemical symbol for lead. The C stands for Combined K+L shell readings. X-ray
fluorescence (XRF) technology works at the atomic level by releasing photons that dislodge electrons
from an atom. Electrons within an atom exist in electron shells, which are labeled K, L, M, N, O, P,
and Q. The analyzer provides K shell, L shell and combined (K+L shell) readings.
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections
Standard Operating Procedures for Lead-Based Paint Inspections and Assessments
[Type text]
Inspections and assessments are conducted in
accordance with the following statues and
rules:
The Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) Guidelines for Evaluation and
Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in
Housing;
HUD Lead Safe Housing Rule, 24 CFR
Part 35;
Environmental Protection Agency 40
CFR Part 745 Lead-Based Paint
Poisoning Prevention in Certain
Residential Structures;
Minnesota Statues 144.9501-09; and
Minnesota Rules 4761.
HUD and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines specify a
positive determination of lead in paint when
the lead content is equal to or greater than 1.0
milligrams of lead per square centimeter of
painted surface (mg/cm2) when measured by
X-ray Fluorescence (XRF). The lead based
paint testing performed for this project used a
NITON XLP Series X-ray Fluorescence
Analyzer (Serial Number 25591, K + L Mode).
Delineation of Room Equivalents: A room
equivalent is identified as a room , a house
exterior, a foyer, staircase, hallway, or an
exterior area. Closets or other similar areas
adjoining rooms are not considered as separate
room equivalents unless they are obviously
dissimilar from the adjoining room equivalent.
Room equivalents are generally listed by
number, starting with the 1st room on the main
entrance and proceeding clockwise on each
floor. Refer to drawings to confirm room
number assignments. Walls are listed in each
room by letter with wall “A” being closest to
the street of address, proceeding clockwise to
“B, C, D” etc. Multiple components (i.e.
windows or doors) are listed moving right to
left along each external wall, and left to right
on internal walls. E.g. moving from the “D-A”
corner to the “A-B” corner.
Components: Each room equivalent is made
up of components. Components in a room
include the ceiling, floor, walls, a door and its
casing, the window sash, and window casings,
etc. In general, the first occurrence of a
component moving from corner to corner on
each wall is tested, and represents all
components of that type in the room. If
multiples of a component type are observed,
the first occurrence moving from corner to
corner on each wall is labeled component 1, the
second component is labeled component 2, etc.
(e.g. door 1, then door 2 or window 1, then
window 2).
Substrate: The substrate is the material
underneath the paint. Many substrates exist,
however, the HUD Final Guidelines
recommend classifying substrates into one of
six substrate types: brick, concrete, drywall,
metal, plaster, and wood. These substrate
types are intended to include a broad range of
materials. If the true substrate is not one of the
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments
54
six types, the substrate that most closely
matches the true substrate is selected.
XRF Testing: Lead-based paint inspections
and assessment involve testing surfaces using
an X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) to
determine lead concentrations. Sampling
protocols are performed in accordance with
HUD Guidelines, Guidelines for the Evaluation
and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in
Housing( Chapter 5, Lead-Based Paint Risk
Assessments, and Chapter 7, Lead-Based Paint
Inspections), the requirements of the
Performance Characteristic Sheet (Performance
Characteristic Sheet for the Niton XLp Portable
XRF Spectrum Analyzer) and Niton’s
requirements of the XRF unit. Three
calibration check readings on a 1.02 mg/cm2
NIST SRM film are taken before and after
obtaining the XRF readings. The Niton XRF
instrument is determined to be in calibration if
the difference between the first calibration
check average and 1.02 mg/cm2 (NIST SRM) is
not greater than the 0.3 mg/cm2 calibration
check tolerance limit obtained from the XRF
Performance Characteristic Sheet.
Dust Wipe Sampling: Sampling protocols for
dust wipe sampling are performed in
accordance with Protocols for Dust and Soil
Sampling, Final Report (EPA report number
7474-R-95-001, March 1995.) Dust wipe
sampling also includes collecting one blank
sample per single-family residence for quality
assurance. Dust wipe and blank samples
collected for laboratory analysis are submitted
to an NLLAP (National Lead Laboratory
Accreditation Program) laboratory for analysis
in accordance with EPA SW846 7420.
Soil Sampling: Assessment may include
collecting composite soil samples for
laboratory analysis of lead in soil. Sampling
protocols are performed in accordance with
HUD Guidelines Chapter 5 Appendix 13.3, Soil
Sampling Protocol for Housing and the
Minnesota Department of Health Lead
Poisoning Prevention Rules 461.200 –
7461.2700. Soil samples are submitted to an
accredited NLLAP laboratory for analysis
performed in accordance with US EPA Method
6010B, the Analysis of Lead using Inductively
Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission.
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections
Sample Type: (fl) floor (ws)-window sill (ww)-window well/trough (cp)-carpeted floor Surface Type: (v)-vinyl ©-carpet (s)-stain/varnish (p)-painted (m)-metal (o)-other Surface Condition: (g)-good (f)-fair (p)-poor
Dust Removal
Dust removal without controlling the source of the dust does not prevent the dust problem from
arising again. Therefore, dust removal should be conducted along with controlling the source of the
dust. Dust removal, in general, can be accomplished by using a HEPA vacuum and wet washing
surfaces containing lead dust. For upholstered furnishings, the HEPA vacuum alone may be used
and rugs may be sent out to be cleaned.
55
TABLE 3 Summary of Dust Wipe Collection and Analytical Results
861 - Main-Level Unit
Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Room Location
Sample Number
Sample Type
Surface
Type Sample
Condition Sample Area
Measurements (inches)
Lead
g/ft2
HUD/State Standards
g/ft2
front entry/living room w-1 fl © g 12 x 12 39.8 40
hall w-2 fl v g 12 x 12 18.7 40
bedroom #1 w-3 fl v g 12 x 12 11.1 40
bedroom #2 w-4 fl v g 12 x 12 <10 40
living room w-5 ws s g 18 x 2 105.1 250
bedroom #2 w-6 ws s g 18 x 2 44.8 250
BLANK w-7 <10
TABLE 4 Summary of Dust Wipe Collection and Analytical Results
861 – 2nd-Level Unit
Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Room Location
Sample Number
Sample Type
Surface
Type Sample
Condition Sample Area
Measurements (inches)
Lead
g/ft2
HUD/State Standards
g/ft2
kitchen w-1 fl v g 12 x 12 <10 40
living room w-2 fl © g 12 x 12 <10 40
bedroom #1 w-3 fl © g 12 x 12 <10 40
bathroom w-4 fl o g 12 x 12 10.7 40
living room w-5 ws s g 18 x 2 <40 250
bedroom #1 w-6 ws s g 18 x 2 88.4 250
BLANK w-7 <10
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments
Sample Type: (fl) floor (ws)-window sill (ww)-window well/trough (cp)-carpeted floor Surface Type: (v)-vinyl ©-carpet (s)-stain/varnish (p)-painted (m)-metal (o)-other Surface Condition: (g)-good (f)-fair (p)-poor
Dust Removal
Dust removal without controlling the source of the dust does not prevent the dust problem from
arising again. Therefore, dust removal should be conducted along with controlling the source of the
dust. Dust removal, in general, can be accomplished by using a HEPA vacuum and wet washing
surfaces containing lead dust. For upholstered furnishings, the HEPA vacuum alone may be used
and rugs may be sent out to be cleaned.
56
TABLE 5 Summary of Dust Wipe Collection and Analytical Results
863 - Main-Level Unit
Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Room Location
Sample Number
Sample Type
Surface
Type Sample
Condition Sample Area
Measurements (inches)
Lead
g/ft2
HUD/State Standards
g/ft2
living room w-1 fl © g 12 x 12 <10 40
kitchen w-2 fl v g 12 x 12 <10 40
entry/hall w-3 fl v g 12 x 12 99.4 40
bedroom #1 w-4 fl v g 12 x 12 54.8 40
living room w-5 ws s g 18 x 2 <10 250
bedroom #1 w-6 ws s g 18 x 2 79.0 250
BLANK w-7 <10
TABLE 6 Summary of Dust Wipe Collection and Analytical Results
863 – 2nd-Level Unit
Fourplex; 861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Room Location
Sample Number
Sample Type
Surface
Type Sample
Condition Sample Area
Measurements (inches)
Lead
g/ft2
HUD/State Standards
g/ft2
kitchen w-1 fl v g 12 x 12 34.9 40
living room w-2 fl © g 12 x 12 <10 40
bedroom #1 w-3 fl © g 12 x 12 <10 40
bathroom w-4 fl o g 12 x 12 11.3 40
living room w-5 ws s f 18 x 2 42.3 250
beroom #1 w-6 ww s g 18 x 2 168.1 250
BLANK w-7 <10
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections
57
I. Lead Paint Hazard Reduction Options
Lead Safe Work Practices
Federal law (Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule; 40 CFR §745, Subpart E) requires contractors
that disturb painted surfaces in homes, child care facilities and schools built before 1978 to be certified
and follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination. Always ask to see your contractor’s
certification. Firms must be certified by EPA and use certified renovators who are trained by EPA-
approved training providers to follow lead-safe work practices.
Federal law requires that individuals receive certain information before renovating more than six
square feet of painted surfaces in a room for interior projects or more than twenty square feet of
painted surfaces for exterior projects or window replacement or demolition in housing, child care
facilities and schools built before 1978.
Homeowners and tenants: renovators must give you this pamphlet before starting work.
Child care facilities, including preschools and kindergarten classrooms, and the families of
children under six years of age that attend those facilities: renovators must provide a copy of
this pamphlet to child care facilities and general renovation information to families whose
children attend those facilities.
Lead safe work practices shall be followed when any lead-based paints are disturbed during
renovation or repair work. Before lead hazard reduction, all work areas should be prepped with drop
cloths and dust containment barriers. The work area shall be cleaned on a daily basis to remove paint
chips and dust. At the conclusion of work, all walls, trim and floors not freshly painted shall be wet
washed and vacuumed or vacuumed with a high efficiency particle accumulator vacuum (HEPA) to
remove remaining dirt. For exterior paint scraping, tarps or plastic sheeting must be used to collect
paint chips. Paint chips and dust must be double-bagged and disposed of properly. Occupants
should not be present during lead hazard reduction. The dwelling unit should not be reoccupied
until clearance has been achieved.
Minnesota Statutes 144.9501-9509 require any contractor who abates lead-based paint as regulated
lead work to have a Minnesota Lead Abatement License. Each member of the work crew must be a
licensed lead worker. Lead abatement licenses are issued by the Minnesota Department of Health
(651-215-0890).
Minnesota Rules, Chapters 4671, require that a licensed lead supervisor must notify the Minnesota
Department of Health (MDH) by mail or fax at least five working days before starting any regulated
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments
58
lead work. A property owner who intends to perform lead hazard reduction must notify MDH by
mail or fax at least ten working days before starting regulated lead work.
Building components with lead-based paints are not considered a lead hazard if they are in “intact”
condition and are not disturbed to create lead dust. However, recommended lead hazard control
measures are provided for all building components identified with lead-based paints for this project
in the event they become deteriorated. The following table is for surfaces identified with lead-based
paints:
TABLE 7 Recommended Lead Hazard Control Measures
861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55130
Room Component Control Measure Options
exterior white wood
window casings
(side A only)
1. window replacement – total1,
2. window enclosure – covering window components
with a wrap2
3. window stabilization and painting – enclose well3
exterior gray wood
porch ceiling
1. remove and dispose4
2. abatement – strip to bare wood5
3. enclosure system6
4. encapsulation7
5. paint stabilization8
unit 861
1st floor
bathroom
white ceramic
baseboards
1. remove and dispose4
2. Building materials with lead-based paints and in
good condition may be maintained by not using
harsh abrasives on them.
unit 861
2nd floor
bathroom
beige metal tub 1. remove and dispose4
2. Lead-based tubs in good condition may be
maintained by not using harsh abrasives on them.
Other options of control consist of placing a liner
within the tub, or refinishing it.
unit 863
common entry
and front
stairway
white wood
stringer, blue
wood stair
treads and risers
1. remove and dispose4
2. abatement – strip to bare wood5
3. encapsulation7
4. paint stabilization8
unit 863 white vinyl 1. remove and dispose4
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments
59
TABLE 7 Recommended Lead Hazard Control Measures
861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55130
Room Component Control Measure Options
common entry
and front
stairway
flooring 2. encapsulation7
unit 863
1st floor
bathroom
yellow ceramic
wall tiles and
white ceramic
tile baseboards
1. remove and dispose4
2. Building materials with lead-based paints and in
good condition may be maintained by not using
harsh abrasives on them.
unit 863
2nd floor
bathroom
white ceramic
tile tub
surround and
white ceramic
tile baseboards
1. remove and dispose4
2. Building materials with lead-based paints and in
good condition may be maintained by not using
harsh abrasives on them.
Recommendations are listed in order from most effective to least effective.
1Window Replacement – Total
Remove, package and dispose of entire window unit. Install pre-hung window unit. Replace casing
and/or trim to match original. Prime and topcoat.
2Window Enclosure – Covering Window Components with a Wrap
Enclosure consists of attaching a durable barrier to building components, such as aluminum window
wrap to a window casing, and sealing the edges with caulk or other sealant. To enclose a surface
containing lead-based paint:
• Stencil “lead paint’ at four-foot intervals on existing surface.
• Apply a Tyvek or equivalent vapor barrier to enclose the lead containing paint.
• Protect Tyvek with vinyl or aluminum wrap or other building component installed in
accordance with manufacturer’ specifications.
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments
60
3Window Stabilization and Painting – Enclose Well
Wet scrape all interior and exterior window components including sashes, jambs and stops. Re-glaze
as required. Laminate well with back-caulked aluminum or vinyl coil stock. HEPA vacuum all
visible dust. Spot prime and topcoat interior and exterior components.
4Remove and Dispose
Remove, package and dispose of lead painted building components. Install replacement components.
For exterior siding, weatherize exterior walls.
5Abatement – Strip to Bare Wood
Scrape to bare substrate. Minor residue may be cleaned with paint remover. Wash surface with a
lead specific detergent or equivalent, rinse, prime and topcoat. Dry scraping/sanding and operation
of heat gun above 700 degree F is prohibited.
6Enclosure Systems
Enclosure systems consist of attaching a durable barrier to building components, such as aluminum
vinyl siding to an exterior finish, and sealing the edges with caulk or other sealant. To enclose a
surface containing lead-based paint:
• Stencil “lead paint’ at four-foot intervals on existing surface.
• Apply a Tyvek or equivalent vapor barrier to enclose the lead containing paint.
• Protect Tyvek with vinyl or aluminum siding or other building component installed in
accordance with manufacturer’ specifications.
7Encapsulation
Encapsulation provides a barrier by using a liquid-applied coating and/or an adhesively bonded
covering material so the lead-based paint is inaccessible. In order for a product to qualify as an
encapsulant, the manufacture must provide a 20-year warranty of the effectiveness of the products.
This process also involves patch testing and visual monitoring.
8Paint Stabilization
Stabilizing building components containing lead-based paints entails repairing deteriorated paint and
then applying new intact paint or varnish to the surface. To stabilize a surface containing lead-based
paint:
• Repair any existing moisture or substrate problems,
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections & Assessments
61
• Remove all loose surface material through wet scraping or wet sanding. Mist defective paint
with water to the point of saturation. Lightly scrape all loose paint.
• Rinse and dry or remove surface contamination by cleaning and deglossing using a chemical
degreaser or sanding with a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) vacuum, washing with
trisodium phosphate (TSP) detergents, and thoroughly rising the surface to remove
efflorescence (salts).
• Spot prime and topcoat with products from the same manufacturer.
II. Lead Dust Hazard Reduction Options Dust removal without controlling the source of the dust does not prevent the dust problem from
arising again. Therefore, dust removal should be conducted along with controlling the source of the
dust. Dust removal, in general, can be accomplished by using a HEPA vacuum and wet washing
surfaces containing lead dust. For upholstered furnishings, the HEPA vacuum alone may be used
and rugs may be sent out to be cleaned. For removing lead dust, HUD recommends the following
three steps:
1. clean the surface using a HEPA vacuum, 2. clean the surfacing by wet washing the area with a general detergent or a special
cleaner made for removing lead, 3. clean the surface using a HEPA vacuum for a final cleaning.
III. Lead Soil Hazard Reduction Options The sources of lead in soil at this property are most likely due to the weathering and “chalking”
and/or previous repainting work that involved the scraping of paint on the underlying siding and/or
other exterior building components with lead-based paints.
Research shows that exposure to lead occurs though both direct ingestion of bare soil, and/or “track-
in” of lead contaminated soil into the interior of dwellings. Sources of lead from soil can significantly
contribute to the blood-lead levels found in children. Recommended interim control options of
reducing exposure of lead from soil consist of the following:
Planting ground cover or shrubbery to reduce exposure to bare soil,
Mulching around the perimeter of the house and garage, and in bare soil areas,
Restricting access by fencing or other actions, and
Controlling further contamination of the areas.
BB Housing Associates August 2, 2011 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix F:
SOP for Lead Paint Inspections
62
Maintenance and Monitoring Schedule
The preceding lead reduction recommendations include different ways to treat each lead hazard that
was identified by the risk assessment. They are listed in order from most effective to least effective.
The most effective treatments are considered abatement and require little or no on-going maintenance
to preserve a lead safe environment. The less effective treatments are called interim controls and
require an increase amount of on-going maintenance to preserve a lead safe environment.
The owner should conduct a visual survey at turnover and/or annually to identify any deteriorated
paint. In general, all painted surfaces should be monitored. A negative result does not necessarily
indicate that no lead is present in that surface, but rather indicates that any lead present in that
surface does not rise above the 1.0 mg/cm2 threshold in the area tested. Therefore, all painted
surfaces should be maintained in intact condition.
Bare soil should be monitored by the owner. Intact ground cover should always be maintained.
TABLE 8 Recommended Re-evaluation Schedule
861 and 863 Burr Street, St. Paul, MN 55130
Control Measure Re-evaluation Type of Re-evaluation
Paint Stabilization8 Annually Visual Inspection
Dust Wipe Sampling
Encapsulation7 Annually Visual Inspection
Enclosure Systems6 Annually Visual Inspection
BB Housing Associates September 12, 2013 EHTS Project Number: 080-13
Appendix G:
Disclosure
63
Disclosure
The Federal Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act, 42 U.S.C. 4852d, requires sellers and
landlords of most residential housing built before 1978 to disclose all available records and reports
concerning lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards, including the test results contained in
this notice, to purchasers and tenants at the time of sale or lease or upon lease renewal. This
disclosure must occur even if hazard reduction or abatement has been completed. Sellers and
Landlords are also required to provide the pamphlet “Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home”
or another similar document approved by the EPA. Sample forms and pamphlets can be obtained
from the EPA or HUD website and duplicated as necessary. To find out more information about your
obligations under federal lead-based paint requirements call 1-800-424-LEAD.
Asbestos BulkAnalysis Report
Client:
Report Number:
Project/Test Address:
Client Number:
Reported Date:
Received Date:
Analyzed Date:
Environmental Health Testing Svc 09/06/2013
24-5884
09/11/2013
13-09-00624
7469 Whitepine Rd
Telephone: 800.347.4010
Richmond, VA 23237
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C.
EHTS 080-13; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St. Paul
Laboratory ResultsFax Number:
2811 Texas Ave. SouthSt. Louis Park, MN 55426
09/09/2013
Layer Type AsbestosClient SampleNumber
OtherMaterials
Lab Gross DescriptionLab SampleNumber
White Paint-Like;Granular; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-001 EHTS 080-13S-1
100% Non-FibrousNAD
White Paint-Like;Granular; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-002 EHTS 080-13S-2
100% Non-FibrousNAD
White Paint-Like;Granular; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-003 EHTS 080-13S-3
100% Non-FibrousNAD
White Paint-Like;Granular; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-004 EHTS 080-13S-4
100% Non-FibrousNAD
White Paint-Like;Granular; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-005 EHTS 080-13S-5
100% Non-FibrousNAD
1 of 7Page
White Paint-Like;Granular; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-006 EHTS 080-13S-6
100% Non-FibrousNAD
White Paint-Like;Granular; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-007 EHTS 080-13S-7
100% Non-FibrousNAD
White Paint-Like;Granular; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-008 EHTS 080-13S-8
100% Non-FibrousNAD
White Paint-Like;Granular; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-009 EHTS 080-13S-9
100% Non-FibrousNAD
Off-White Paint-Like;White Chalky; TanGranular; Brown Fibrous;Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-010 EHTS 080-13S-10
35% Cellulose65% Non-Fibrous
NAD
Off-White Paint-Like;White Chalky; Granular;Brown Fibrous;Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-011 EHTS 080-13S-11
35% Cellulose65% Non-Fibrous
NAD
White Paint-Like; Chalky;Brown Fibrous;Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-012 EHTS 080-13S-12
30% Cellulose2% Fibrous Glass68% Non-Fibrous
NAD
No joint compound present.
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C
Project/Test Address:
Client Number: Report Number:24-5884 13-09-00624
EHTS 080-13; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St.Paul
OtherMaterials
AsbestosLab SampleNumber
Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient SampleNumber
2 of 7Page
Tan/White Vinyl;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-013A EHTS 080-13S-13
100% Non-FibrousTile NAD
Clear Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-013B EHTS 080-13S-13
100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD
Brown Brittle; Fibrous;Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-014 EHTS 080-13S-14
45% Cellulose55% Non-Fibrous
NAD
Brown Vinyl;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-015A EHTS 080-13S-15
100% Non-FibrousTile NAD
Tan Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-015B EHTS 080-13S-15
100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD
Yellow Hard;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-016A EHTS 080-13S-16
100% Non-FibrousCeramicTile
NAD
Gray Cementitious;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-016B EHTS 080-13S-16
100% Non-FibrousGrout NAD
White/Tan Vinyl;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-017A EHTS 080-13S-17
2% Synthetic98% Non-Fibrous
Tile NAD
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C
Project/Test Address:
Client Number: Report Number:24-5884 13-09-00624
EHTS 080-13; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St.Paul
OtherMaterials
AsbestosLab SampleNumber
Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient SampleNumber
3 of 7Page
Tan Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-017B EHTS 080-13S-17
100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD
Gold Vinyl; Gray Fibrous;Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-018A EHTS 080-13S-18
18% Cellulose62% Non-Fibrous
Linoleum 20% Chrysotile
Chrysotile present in the fibrous backing.
20%Total Asbestos:
Yellow Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-018B EHTS 080-13S-18
100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD
White Hard;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-019A EHTS 080-13S-19
100% Non-FibrousCeramicTile
NAD
Gray Cementitious;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-019B EHTS 080-13S-19
100% Non-FibrousGrout NAD
Pale Yellow Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-019C EHTS 080-13S-19
100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD
Beige Hard;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-020A EHTS 080-13S-20
100% Non-FibrousCeramicTile
NAD
Gray Cementitious;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-020B EHTS 080-13S-20
100% Non-FibrousGrout NAD
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C
Project/Test Address:
Client Number: Report Number:24-5884 13-09-00624
EHTS 080-13; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St.Paul
OtherMaterials
AsbestosLab SampleNumber
Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient SampleNumber
4 of 7Page
Pale Yellow Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-020C EHTS 080-13S-20
100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD
Beige Hard;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-021A EHTS 080-13S-21
100% Non-FibrousCeramicTile
NAD
White Rubbery Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-021B EHTS 080-13S-21
100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD
Tan Vinyl; Fibrous;Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-022A EHTS 080-13S-22
65% Cellulose35% Non-Fibrous
Flooring NAD
White Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-022B EHTS 080-13S-22
100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD
Tan Hard; Homogeneous13-09-00624-023A EHTS 080-13S-23
100% Non-FibrousCeramicTile
NAD
Gray Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-023B EHTS 080-13S-23
100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD
White Hard;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-024A EHTS 080-13S-24
100% Non-FibrousCeramicTile
NAD
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C
Project/Test Address:
Client Number: Report Number:24-5884 13-09-00624
EHTS 080-13; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St.Paul
OtherMaterials
AsbestosLab SampleNumber
Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient SampleNumber
5 of 7Page
Brown Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-024B EHTS 080-13S-24
100% Non-FibrousMastic I NAD
White Adhesive;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-024C EHTS 080-13S-24
100% Non-FibrousMastic II NAD
Brown Fibrous;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-025 EHTS 080-13S-25
95% Cellulose5% Non-Fibrous
NAD
Orange Foam-Like;Homogeneous
13-09-00624-026 EHTS 080-13S-26
100% Non-FibrousNAD
Gray Brittle; BrownFibrous; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-027 EHTS 080-13S-27
85% Cellulose15% Non-Fibrous
NAD
Gray/Brown Aggregate;Black Tar-Like; BrownFibrous; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-028 EHTS 080-13S-28
70% Cellulose30% Non-Fibrous
NAD
Gray/Brown Aggregate;Black Tar-Like; BrownFibrous; Inhomogeneous
13-09-00624-029 EHTS 080-13S-29
70% Cellulose30% Non-Fibrous
NAD
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C
Project/Test Address:
Client Number: Report Number:24-5884 13-09-00624
EHTS 080-13; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St.Paul
OtherMaterials
AsbestosLab SampleNumber
Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient SampleNumber
6 of 7Page
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C
Project/Test Address:
Client Number: Report Number:24-5884 13-09-00624
EHTS 080-13; 861 & 863 Burr Street, St.Paul
OtherMaterials
AsbestosLab SampleNumber
Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient SampleNumber
Tasha Eaddy
1% Asbestos
Analyst:
Reporting Limit:
Method:
QC Blank:
QC Sample:
Sami Hosn
EPA Method 600/R-93/116, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020
QA/QC Clerk
Reviewed By Authorized Signatory:
39-M1-1999-2
SRM 1866 Fiberglass
NAD = no asbestos detectedLEGEND:
The condition of the samples analyzed was acceptable upon receipt per laboratory protocol unless otherwise noted on this report. Each distinct
component in an inhomogeneous sample was analyzed separately and reported as a composite. Results represent the analysis of samples submitted
by the client. Sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the client. This report cannot be used by the client to claim product
endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of the
Environmental Hazards Service, L.L.C. California Certification #2319 NY ELAP #11714 NVLAP #101882-0. All information concerning sampling
location, date, and time can be found on Chain-of-Custody. Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. does not perform any sample collection.
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. recommends reanalysis by point count (for more accurate quantification) or Transmission Electron Microscopy
(TEM), (for enhanced detection capabilities) for materials regulated by EPA NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and
found to contain less than ten percent (<10%) asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Both services are available for an additional fee.
400 Point Count Analysis, where noted, performed per EPA Method 600/R-93/116 with a Reporting Limit of 0.25%.
* All California samples analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020, Dec. 1982.
7 of 7Page
Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Dust Wipe by NIOSH Method 7082
Client Project :
162665
08/23/2013
09/03/2013
09/04/2013
09/04/2013Date Reported :
Date Analyzed :
Date Received :
Sampling Date :
AAT Project :
Phone :
Email :
Fax :
952-297-5169
Kris
EHTS
Attn :
Client :
Ranjana ValechaAnalyst :861 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL MAIN-LEVEL UNITProject Location :
EHTS 080-13-A
12950 Haggerty Road
Belleville, MI 48111
Ph: (734) 699-labs; Fax: (734) 699-8407
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
2950 Aquila Avenue South
Lab Sample IDArea
(Sq ft)
Width
(inch)
Length
(inch)Sample DescriptionClient Code
Results Lead
μg/ft2 *
W-1 FLOOR-FRONT ENTRY LIVING 1.0012 12 39.791621262
W-2 FLOOR-HALL 1.0012 12 18.671621263
W-3 FLOOR-BEDROOM #1 1.0012 12 11.061621264
W-4 FLOOR-BEDROOM #2 1.0012 12 <10.001621265
W-5 SILL-LIVING ROOM 0.2518 2 105.081621266
W-6 SILL-BEDROOM #1 0.2518 2 44.761621267
W-7 FLOOR-LAUNDRY 1.0012 12 <10.001621268
Analyst Signature
162665 AAT Project:Date Printed: 09/04/2013 1:50PM
(ND=Not Detected, N/A Not Available, RL Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 10 ug/sample) * For true values assume (2) significant figures.
The method and batch QC is acceptable unless otherwise stated. EPA HUD Regulatory Limits: 40 ug/ft2 (Floors Carpeted/uncarpeted), 250ug/ft2
(Window Sill/Stools), 400 ug/ft2 (Window Trough /Well/Ext Concrete Surfaces) The laboratory operates in accord with ISO 17025 guidelines and
holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT LLC current terms
and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as
AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042
Page 2 of 2
EHTSTo :
Attn :
Phone :
AAT Project :
Client Project :
Date Reported :
Project Location :
Email :Kris
952-297-5169
12950 Haggerty Road
Belleville, MI 48111
Ph:(734) 699-labs; Fax:(734) 699-8407
162665
09/04/2013
EHTS 080-13-A
861 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL MAIN-LEVEL UNIT
2950 Aquila Avenue South
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
Sample CompletedAnalysis RequestedClient Code
1621262 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-1
1621263 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-2
1621264 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-3
1621265 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-4
1621266 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-5
1621267 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-6
1621268 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-7
Quality Assurance Coordinator - Robert A TheysReviewed By
162665 AAT Project:Date Printed: 09/04/2013 1:50PM
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are
herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error,
please notify AAT immediately. Thank you.
AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042
Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Dust Wipe by NIOSH Method 7082
Client Project :
162707
08/23/2013
09/03/2013
09/04/2013
09/04/2013Date Reported :
Date Analyzed :
Date Received :
Sampling Date :
AAT Project :
Phone :
Email :
Fax :
952-297-5169
Kris
EHTS
Attn :
Client :
Zack WhiddonAnalyst :861 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL 2ND FLOOR UNITProject Location :
EHTS 080-13-B
12950 Haggerty Road
Belleville, MI 48111
Ph: (734) 699-labs; Fax: (734) 699-8407
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
2950 Aquila Avenue South
Lab Sample IDArea
(Sq ft)
Width
(inch)
Length
(inch)Sample DescriptionClient Code
Results Lead
μg/ft2 *
W-1 FLOOR-KITCHEN 1.0012 12 <10.001621628
W-2 FLOOR-LIVING ROOM 1.0012 12 <10.001621629
W-3 FLOOR-BEDROOM #1 1.0012 12 <10.001621630
W-4 FLOOR-BATHROOM 1.0012 12 10.731621631
W-5 SILL-LIVING ROOM 0.2518 2 <40.001621632
W-6 SILL-BEDROOM #1 0.2518 2 88.421621633
W-7 FLOOR-FRONT PORCH 1.0012 12 <10.001621634
Analyst Signature
162707 AAT Project:Date Printed: 09/04/2013 3:35PM
(ND=Not Detected, N/A Not Available, RL Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 10 ug/sample) * For true values assume (2) significant figures.
The method and batch QC is acceptable unless otherwise stated. EPA HUD Regulatory Limits: 40 ug/ft2 (Floors Carpeted/uncarpeted), 250ug/ft2
(Window Sill/Stools), 400 ug/ft2 (Window Trough /Well/Ext Concrete Surfaces) The laboratory operates in accord with ISO 17025 guidelines and
holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT LLC current terms
and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as
AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042
Page 2 of 2
EHTSTo :
Attn :
Phone :
AAT Project :
Client Project :
Date Reported :
Project Location :
Email :Kris
952-297-5169
12950 Haggerty Road
Belleville, MI 48111
Ph:(734) 699-labs; Fax:(734) 699-8407
162707
09/04/2013
EHTS 080-13-B
861 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL 2ND FLOOR UNIT
2950 Aquila Avenue South
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
Sample CompletedAnalysis RequestedClient Code
1621628 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-1
1621629 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-2
1621630 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-3
1621631 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-4
1621632 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-5
1621633 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-6
1621634 09/04/2013Dust WipeW-7
Quality Assurance Coordinator - Robert A TheysReviewed By
162707 AAT Project:Date Printed: 09/04/2013 3:35PM
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are
herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error,
please notify AAT immediately. Thank you.
AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042
Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Dust Wipe by NIOSH Method 7082
Client Project :
162655
08/23/2013
09/03/2013
09/04/2013
09/04/2013Date Reported :
Date Analyzed :
Date Received :
Sampling Date :
AAT Project :
Phone :
Email :
Fax :
952-297-5169
Kris
EHTS
Attn :
Client :
Nathan DittyAnalyst :863 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL MAIN-LEVEL UNITProject Location :
EHTS 080-13-C
12950 Haggerty Road
Belleville, MI 48111
Ph: (734) 699-labs; Fax: (734) 699-8407
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
2950 Aquila Avenue South
Lab Sample IDArea
(Sq ft)
Width
(inch)
Length
(inch)Sample DescriptionClient Code
Results Lead
μg/ft2 *
W-1 FLOOR-LIVING ROOM 1.0012 12 <10.001621043
W-2 FLOOR-KITCHEN 1.0012 12 <10.001621044
W-3 FLOOR-ENTRY 1.0012 12 99.391621045
W-4 FLOOR-BEDROOM #1 1.0012 12 54.751621046
W-5 SILL-LIVING ROOM 0.2518 2 <40.001621047
W-6 SILL-BEDROOM #1 0.2518 2 79.021621048
W-7 FLOOR-LAUNDRY 1.0012 12 <10.001621049
Analyst Signature
162655 AAT Project:Date Printed: 09/04/2013 3:45PM
(ND=Not Detected, N/A Not Available, RL Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 10 ug/sample) * For true values assume (2) significant figures.
The method and batch QC is acceptable unless otherwise stated. EPA HUD Regulatory Limits: 40 ug/ft2 (Floors Carpeted/uncarpeted), 250ug/ft2
(Window Sill/Stools), 400 ug/ft2 (Window Trough /Well/Ext Concrete Surfaces) The laboratory operates in accord with ISO 17025 guidelines and
holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT LLC current terms
and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as
AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042
Page 2 of 2
EHTSTo :
Attn :
Phone :
AAT Project :
Client Project :
Date Reported :
Project Location :
Email :Kris
952-297-5169
12950 Haggerty Road
Belleville, MI 48111
Ph:(734) 699-labs; Fax:(734) 699-8407
162655
09/04/2013
EHTS 080-13-C
863 BURR STREET-ST. PAUL MAIN-LEVEL UNIT
2950 Aquila Avenue South
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
Sample CompletedAnalysis RequestedClient Code
1621043 09/04/2013Dust Wipe W-1
1621044 09/04/2013Dust Wipe W-2
1621045 09/04/2013Dust Wipe W-3
1621046 09/04/2013Dust Wipe W-4
1621047 09/04/2013Dust Wipe W-5
1621048 09/04/2013Dust Wipe W-6
1621049 09/04/2013Dust Wipe W-7
Quality Assurance Coordinator - Robert A TheysReviewed By
162655 AAT Project:Date Printed: 09/04/2013 3:45PM
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are
herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error,
please notify AAT immediately. Thank you.
AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042
Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Analysis: Lead In Dust Wipe by NIOSH Method 7082
Client Project :
162974
08/26/2013
09/05/2013
09/06/2013
09/06/2013Date Reported :
Date Analyzed :
Date Received :
Sampling Date :
AAT Project :
Phone :
Email :
Fax :
952-297-5169
Kris
EHTS
Attn :
Client :
Ralph HorvatAnalyst :
863 BURR STREET ST.PAUL 2ND LEVEL UNITProject Location :
EHTS 080-13
12950 Haggerty Road
Belleville, MI 48111
Ph: (734) 699-labs; Fax: (734) 699-8407
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
2950 Aquila Avenue South
Lab Sample IDArea
(Sq ft)
Width
(inch)
Length
(inch)Sample DescriptionClient Code
Results Lead
μg/ft2 *
W-1 FLOOR- KITCHEN 1.0012 12 34.931623785
W-2 FLOOR-LIVING 1.0012 12 <10.001623786
W-3 FLOOR-BEDROOM 1 1.0012 12 <10.001623787
W-4 FLOOR-BATHROOM 1.0012 12 11.341623788
W-5 SILL-LIVING ROOM 0.2518 2 42.341623789
W-6 SILL-BEDROOM 1 0.2518 2 168.141623790
W-7 FLOOR-LAUNDRY 1.0012 12 <10.001623791
Analyst Signature
162974 AAT Project:Date Printed: 09/06/2013 10:49AM
(ND=Not Detected, N/A Not Available, RL Reporting Limit, Analytical Reporting Limit is 10 ug/sample) * For true values assume (2) significant figures.
The method and batch QC is acceptable unless otherwise stated. EPA HUD Regulatory Limits: 40 ug/ft2 (Floors Carpeted/uncarpeted), 250ug/ft2
(Window Sill/Stools), 400 ug/ft2 (Window Trough /Well/Ext Concrete Surfaces) The laboratory operates in accord with ISO 17025 guidelines and
holds limited scopes of accreditation under AIHA and NY State DOH ELAP programs. These results are submitted pursuant to AAT LLC current terms
and conditions of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitation of liability provisions. Analytical results relate to the samples as
AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042
Page 2 of 2
EHTSTo :
Attn :
Phone :
AAT Project :
Client Project :
Date Reported :
Project Location :
Email :Kris
952-297-5169
12950 Haggerty Road
Belleville, MI 48111
Ph:(734) 699-labs; Fax:(734) 699-8407
162974
09/06/2013
EHTS 080-13
863 BURR STREET ST.PAUL 2ND LEVEL UNIT
2950 Aquila Avenue South
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
Sample CompletedAnalysis RequestedClient Code
1623785 09/06/2013Dust WipeW-1
1623786 09/06/2013Dust WipeW-2
1623787 09/06/2013Dust WipeW-3
1623788 09/06/2013Dust WipeW-4
1623789 09/06/2013Dust WipeW-5
1623790 09/06/2013Dust WipeW-6
1623791 09/06/2013Dust WipeW-7
Quality Assurance Coordinator - Robert A TheysReviewed By
162974 AAT Project:Date Printed: 09/06/2013 10:49AM
This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are
herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error,
please notify AAT immediately. Thank you.
AIHA ELLAP- Lab ID #100986, NY State DOH ELAP -Lab ID #11864, State of Ohio- Lab ID # 10042