new prague municipal swimming pool new prague, mn
TRANSCRIPT
Facility Assessment and Project Study
- For -
New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool New Prague, MN
June 10, 2014
- By -
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 2
Executive Summary
Statement of Understanding
The City of New Prague owns and ISD #721 through its Community Education Department
programs/operates the existing municipal outdoor pool facility that is aging, the facility has a number of
operational concerns as well as a community / city concern for offering its pool users more facility amenities.
The existing outdoor facility only generates around half of the revenue required to stay operational. The
pools also have code and ADA compliance issues.
USAquatics first conducted an assessment of the existing municipal pool in 2009. Almost five years have
passed since the original assessment, and an updated study of this facility is clearly warranted to determine its
condition to date, and provide some options for renovation or expansion to serve the changing aquatic needs
of the community. The goal of this study is to aid in the making of important decisions concerning the
facility and its future, including options for expansion and adding amenities.
Assessment Process
Tom Schaffer and Ryan Johnson from USAquatics have completed an onsite evaluation of the existing
aquatic facility along with assistance from Maintenance Supervisor Glen Sticha, Operator Scott Warner and
Planning Director Ken Ondich. The purpose of the assessment was to determine the facilities condition and
usability to include record data from past seasons. In addition, a Community Survey has been created and
results will be reviewed and included as part of this Study.
Scope of Study
The scope of this study covers the following areas of the facility:
Swimming pool structure, recirculation, filtration, and sanitation equipment
Pool deck area, diving boards, features, etc.
Compliance with new Federal and State Main Drain Laws
Compliance with new Americans with Disabilities Act Laws
Attendance, revenues and expenses
Provide options for renovation/new facility
Provide possible location sites for a new facility
Study Criteria
The criteria used in our assessment include:
Previous assessment completed by USAquatics
Facility condition and other observable conditions
Facility code requirements and compliance
An understanding of cause and effect associated with various aquatic designs and operating
procedures as presented to us through the assessment, review, and design of several thousand aquatic
facilities
Study area demographics used in determining community aquatic needs
Study results of a Community Aquatics Survey
Intent of Report
The intent is to present a summary of needed improvements and added amenities including factors affecting
patron usage, revenue potentials, and expenses associated with the operation and management of the aquatic
facility. The goal is to provide stake holders with the necessary information to make informed decisions
regarding the future of Aquatics in New Prague.
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 3
Summary
Based on discussions with staff, a physical assessment of the existing outdoor facility, analysis of the existing
condition and evaluation of the community survey at the New Prague Municipal Pool Facility, USAquatics
has determined that the facility warrants a large number of improvements and expansion to better serve the
needs of the community. Several amenity options for the expansion of the outdoor pool facility have been
provided for consideration. These amenity options provide a range from repairing the existing outdoor
facility, renovation and expansion to an entirely new facility.
The main pool offers a very small variety of aquatic amenities including 1-meter diving, lap lanes, walk out
stairs and varying water depths to meet some of the community’s aquatic needs. This pool would be costly to
expand as any aquatic program expansion to the pool would require larger filtration, recirculation and water
treatment systems, as well as, major changes to the pool structure.
The wading pool is undersized to adequately serve the younger patrons of New Prague, as well as the growing
demand for an accessible zero depth beach type entry body of water. This pool would also be costly to
expand due to filtration and recirculation requirements. It would be far more cost effective to demolish the
existing wading pool and construct a new zero depth entry pool complete with a wide variety of amenities
geared toward younger children.
Neither pool meets requirements for ADA accessibility. Due to the size of the main pool, two means of ADA
ingress/egress are required of which the primary entrance needs to be a ramp or zero-depth entry. It should be
noted, the main pool having two means of ingress/egress for ADA was not a requirement at the time of the
previous assessment. A fixed ADA lift was ordered in May of 2014. There is a sizeable added expense to
make both pools ADA accessible.
The main cost difference from the original assessment and budget estimate to the current preliminary cost
estimate is simply inflation in construction costs since 2009 and current trends we have seen on outdoor
aquatic projects. Additionally, the earlier assessment was done on the pool and did not include bathhouse
work or associated costs. This study includes options and estimated pricing for expanding the current facility
and adding amenities such as play features, a climbing wall and waterslide – which were not part of the 2009
assessment. Regenerative media is shown as the replacement for the current sand filters as opposed to the
prior assessment replacing sand with sand.
The facility as a whole does not provide an appropriate aquatic venue for a community the size of New
Prague. The facility is too small in relation to the New Prague area demographics. Any proposed aquatic
facility solution should take into account the City demographics that show a high percentage of youth and
young families. We recommend the expansion of program elements to serve the New Prague aquatic
community. The aquatic expansion should also provide a secondary service area of approximately a 15-30
mile radius. Given the growth and size of New Prague, the current pool site may not be the best location to
service the community as a whole and alternative locations should be considered. The following is a list of
possible options for the future of the existing outdoor pool facility:
o Option – 1: Close the existing outdoor pool. This would mean swimming lessons would no longer
be offered in New Prague. The bathhouse, pools and decks would be demolished and removed.
Utilities would be capped. The voids would be filled in and sod/seed placed over to create a lawn
area. The current City subsidy would no longer be required. Patrons of the existing pool would
travel elsewhere for lessons, recreation, etc.
Estimated cost range: $47,400 - $55,200
o Option – 1A: Close the existing outdoor pool. Same as above; however, the bathhouse and utilities
would remain. The bathhouse could be utilized for other purposes (ex: baseball, etc.)
Estimated cost range: $36,600 - $42,600
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 4
o Option – 2: Repair Existing. Make only the recommended repairs to the existing pools and facility to
address operational issues, concerns and code issues including accessibility. This Option would not
expand the facility or add any aquatic play elements. The wading pool would be modified to 600 s.f.
splash pool and would include a zero-depth entry for accessibility. The coping brick around both
pools would be removed and a new poured concrete edge installed. Both pools would receive a new
epoxy paint finish. New pumps/filters would be installed along with associated piping. Decks would
be selectively demolished and replaced as needed. This Option would create little if any increase of
operational costs and revenues. The City subsidy would still be required to assist with operational
expenses. Attendance would remain at current levels while decreasing slowly.
Estimated cost range: $471,480 - $516,780
o Option – 3: Renovate and Expand Existing. Make necessary repairs to the existing main pool and
demo and remove the existing wading pool. Install a larger 1,200 s.f. zero-depth entry splash pool
more appropriate sized to meet the needs of the community. This Option would include the addition
of a climbing wall to the main pool and making necessary adjustments to the pool to allow for a
waterslide to be installed in the shallow-end of the main pool. Shade structures would be added
around the deck area. The coping brick around the main pool would be removed and a new stainless
steel gutter with grating installed. Both pools would have a new quartz aggregate plaster with
ceramic tile accents installed. New pumps/filters would be installed along with associated piping
necessary for the new gutter recirculation system. All decks would be replaced. This Option would
make for increased operational costs due to replacing the wading pool with a larger splash pool, as
well as the addition of a waterslide. Adding aquatic features and amenities may increase attendance
and revenue; however, the City subsidy would continue to be needed for operation. Attendance
would increase with this Option; however, numbers would drop off after the first few years.
Estimated cost range: $1,434,220 - $1,593,960
o Option – 4: Spray Pad/Wet Deck. The existing pools would be demolished and back-filled in. A
new 800-1,000 s.f. Spray Pad/Wet Deck would be constructed on the current site. The Spray
Pad/Wet Deck would be complete with pump/filter and recirculation system including piping.
Several spray features and interactive play features would be included. With this option, overall
attendance would decrease as this Option only targets the younger age groups. Operational expenses
would decrease due to less staffing being required, less water to treat with chemicals, etc. With this
option there would be little to no revenue generated as typically facilities of this type charge no
admission. The operational subsidy would decrease.
Estimated cost range: $491,400-$558,600
o Option – 5: New Aquatic Facility. This Option would allow for the existing facility to remain open
for use during construction of a new facility. The new facility would be appropriately sized to meet
the needs of the community while providing a wider range of aquatic amenities that better reflects the
demographics of New Prague. A new facility would also be designed to accommodate for future
growth and could potentially be located on the Armory site. No preliminary design work has been
completed; however, a City the size of New Prague could support a facility with an estimated total
project cost of around $4-$5 million.
Estimated cost range: TBD
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 5
Table of Contents
SECTION ONE: ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................. 6
Main Pool ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Recirculation System ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Pool Equipment - General ............................................................................................................................... 6 Pump .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Heater ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Pool Filter ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Flow Rate ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Chemical Control ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Wading Pool .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Wading Pool Recirculation System .................................................................................................................. 8 Wading Pool Heater ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Wading Pool Pump .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Wading Pool Filter ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Wading Pool Chemical Control ........................................................................................................................ 8 Bathhouse ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Concessions..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Deck Area ........................................................................................................................................................ 9
SECTION TWO: OPTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 10
Option – 1 (Close outdoor pool) .................................................................................................................... 10 Option – 1A (Close outdoor pool – Bathhouse remains) ................................................................................ 10 Option – 2 (Repair Existing) ........................................................................................................................... 10 Option – 3 (Renovate and Expand) ................................................................................................................ 12 Option – 4 (Wet Deck/Spray Pad).................................................................................................................. 14
SECTION THREE: EXISTING FACILITY ............................................................................................... 16
Facility Layout ............................................................................................................................................... 16 2014 Admission Rates ................................................................................................................................... 17 2013 School Expenditures ............................................................................................................................. 17 2013 City Expenditures.................................................................................................................................. 17 Revenue vs. Expense (2013-2007) ................................................................................................................. 17 Revenue vs. Expenses ................................................................................................................................... 18 Census Information ....................................................................................................................................... 19 2010 Attendance Information ....................................................................................................................... 20 Existing Facility Photographs ......................................................................................................................... 21
SECTION FOUR: PRELIMINARY DESIGN ............................................................................................ 25
Option – 3 Renovate & Expand Existing Facility ............................................................................................ 25 Option – 4 Spray Pad/Wet Deck .................................................................................................................... 26 Option – 5 New Family Aquatic Center .......................................................................................................... 27
SECTION FIVE: NEW AQUATIC FACILITY ANALYSIS...................................................................... 28
APPENDIX A: EXISTING POOL DATA .................................................................................................. 29
APPENDIX B: 2010 COMMUNITY EDUCATION PLANNING SURVEY RESULTS ...................... 30
APPENDIX C: 2014 COMMUNITY SURVEY ........................................................................................ 30
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 6
SECTION ONE: ASSESSMENT
Main Pool
The main pool was built in 1983 and opened the following summer in 1984. The main pool consists of a 6-
lane lap pool with attached deep water diving well, as well as multi-use area. Pool depths vary from 3’-6” at
the shallow end to 12’-0” at the diving well. The diving well has two 1-meter diving boards. The 1-meter
diving boards are in fair condition
Since the pool perimeter is in excess of 300 feet, two means of ADA compliant access are required. Currently
the Main Pool does not provide any means of ADA access. We recommend the addition of a “fixed” ADA
lift to account for one means of access. In order to be compliant with ADA access requirements the primary
means of access into the pool must be a ramp or beach type zero depth entry, which would account for the
second means of access. It should be noted a fixed ADA lift was ordered in May and will be installed upon
arrival.
The Main Pool has very limited amenities for recreational aquatic activity, educational aquatic needs and
aquatic fitness. The pool vessel is in poor shape and a large crack, which appears to be located at the
construction cold joint, spans across the lap area. The main pool has been patched numerous times over the
years and continues to require additional work. There are several areas of spalling where the paint finish is
flaking off leaving bare concrete exposed. In addition, the ceramic tile in the pool and waterline tile is
coming off in several locations and all areas of ceramic tile are in need of grout replacement.
Due to the existing conditions of the main pool epoxy paint finish, we recommend sand blasting the shell to
sound concrete, and the troweling of quartz aggregate plaster with ceramic tile accents. This would also be a
longer lasting pool finish.
The coping brick surrounding the entire Main Pool is in extremely poor condition. The bricks have become
brittle with age and are cracking and breaking off in pieces or completely. This is a safety issue for patrons as
the broken coping bricks are left with several sharp edges which can easily cut feet or hands.
Overall, the main pool lacks the aquatic needs of the New Prague aquatic community.
Recirculation System
The Main Pool has surface skimmers rather than a gutter system, which would be ideal for a pool of this size.
Based on Aquatic industry standards, pools wider than 30’ or over 2,000 square feet should have a gutter
system that allows for skimming around the entire perimeter. Several of the existing skimmers are either
missing weirs or have broken weirs. In addition, the federal Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act
(VGB) requires certified grate covers over the skimmer equalizer lines. At the time of the assessment none of
the equalizer lines had covers; however, covers have since been installed.
The Main Pool is in compliance with the State of Minnesota Abigail Taylor Pool Safety Act (ATA), which
protects patrons from entrapment in pool suction openings. VGB requires all pool grates to be tested and
stamped compliant with ANSI A112.19.8-2007. The current grate covers were stamped in 2008 and should
be replaced prior to the 2015 swimming season.
Staff reported 2-3 broken pipe locations over the past few years that led to concrete decks settling. Those
pipes were repaired; however, there is still suspicion that there are leaks within the recirculation piping.
Pool Equipment - General
The pool equipment is largely original to the facility with a few exceptions. The equipment met the needs of
the community; however, for the most part it is outdated and inefficient in terms of operation. A number of
the valves are cast iron, rusting, and not holding their seal. Valves should be replaced with non-metallic
valves designed for pool use.
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 7
Pump
The main pool pump is a horizontal pump located above water level which can make priming and servicing
difficult. The existing pump is in poor condition and is very inefficient. A vertically mounted high efficiency
pump with a premium motor installed below water level would solve priming difficulties and provide higher
efficiency during operation. The current size and layout of the mechanical room does not allow for a recessed
pump pit. In addition to a new pump located in a pump pit, we recommend adding a variable frequency drive
to the motor. This provides significant energy cost savings and efficiency while extending the life of the
pump and reducing maintenance.
The pump strainer is original to the facility and is poor condition. It is cast iron and is badly rusted. Strainers
of this age and condition become very difficult to open and close properly and have limited capacity. We
recommend replacing the strainer at the same time the pump is replaced. It should be replaced with a non-
metallic strainer with a clear lid and large strainer basket.
Heater
The main pool has is serviced by a large Raypak natural gas fired heater. This heater was installed in 2013.
Staff reported no issues or concerns with this equipment.
Pool Filter
The existing sand filter is original to the 1984 construction of this facility. As noted in the prior assessment,
due to its age and condition, this filter poses a number of concerns and operational issues. The filter is
constructed of mild steel and is completely covered in rust. Often times the interior of these tanks are in even
worse condition and the integrity of the tank is of concern. The pressure gauges noted in the earlier report as
not functioning properly have been replaced.
According to the operator, the pool is backwashed on Monday, Wednesday and Friday during the regular
swimming season. Backwashing should only take place when required based on pressure differential. As
long as flow rates are met, backwashing the filter should be kept to a minimum to save on water, chemicals
and heat. In addition, the filter sand has not been looked at in at least the past 17 years. Typical filter sand
media should be replaced every 3-5 years. The pool filter also lacks the air gap to waste that is required. The
valves on the face piping do not work properly due to age and corrosion.
We recommend the installation of new regenerative media filters that are more efficient, take up a fraction of
the current footprint, and are green friendly using 1/50th of the water used by traditional sand filters. In
addition, replacing the existing sand filters with regenerative media filters would allow for more ‘open space’
in the mechanical room to service other equipment. Although we recommend regenerative media filters, we
will provide filter replacement options for both regenerative media filters and traditional sand filters.
At a minimum, if the filter is not replaced - the manholes should be removed and the filter sand should be
inspected. The sand media should be loose with no clumping or hard top coating.
Flow Rate
The required flow rate for the Main Pool based on the maximum allowed 6-hour turnover is 584 gpm. Due to
the facility being closed at the time of the inspection, we were unable to verify the current flow rate. The
prior assessment noted the flow rate at 450 gpm; however, the accuracy of the flow meter was in question. It
is possible the original design flow rate was greater than a 6-hour turnover. Additionally, the 6-inch suction
pipe is limited to 529 gpm by code. The suction pipe should be sized at 8” to allow for full flow suction.
Chemical Control
The chemical control system is a Strantrol System 3. This controller is outdated technology and inadequate to
meet the needs of the facility. We recommend a new, user-friendly, web-based chemical controller that can
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 8
reduce operational and maintenance issues. This new technology also allows operators the ability to access
and control settings remotely.
Wading Pool
The Wading Pool is square in shape and located adjacent to the main pool. The wading pool depth varies
from 1’-0” to 1’-6”. There is a 3ft. chain link fence as a barrier separating the wading pool from the rest of
the facility. As was the case with the Main Pool, the coping brick is in poor condition, with several cracks
and broken pieces.
The Wading Pool lacks any interactive features or water play elements and is not sized appropriately to
service the younger demographics of the New Prague community. The wading pool also lacks any form of
ADA access. The Minnesota State Department of Health now requires all wading pools to have a zero-depth
entry. Due to the size, depth and condition of the Wading Pool – we have determined that renovating it is not
a viable option. We recommend demolishing the wading pool to allow for a larger splash pool with a zero
depth entry. At a minimum, we recommend replacing the coping brick as needed or utilizing a form to pour a
new coping as a short term solution.
Wading Pool Recirculation System
The Wading Pool has one surface skimmers located on a side wall. The Wading Pool has four inlets and a
single main drain. The Wading Pool main drain is compliant for State and federal law; however, due to
standing water in the pool at the time of inspection we were unable to verify the date on the grating. It is
assumed the grate cover was purchased at the same time as the Main Pool cover meaning it is due for
replacement.
Wading Pool Heater
There is no heater on the wading pool. Heated shallow water is the #1 or most commonly asked for amenity
for aquatic facilities. We recommend the addition of a heater that is adequately sized to handle loads required
for a new splash pool.
Wading Pool Pump
The Wading Pool is serviced by one pump, a 1.5HP high-rpm pump that is located above water level. This
pump is aging and very inefficient. This pump handles recirculation with suction from the main drain and
skimmer. As with the Main Pool pump, a vertically mounted high efficiency pump with a premium motor
installed below water level would solve priming difficulties and provide higher efficiency during operation.
Based on our recommendation to completely replace the existing wading pool, a new zero depth splash pool
would require a new pump to handle the increased volume. At that time we recommend installation of
vertical mount high efficiency pump in a recessed pump pit below water level, with a premium motor and
variable frequency drive.
Wading Pool Filter
The sand filter dedicated to the Wading Pool is a Triton TR-100, which is a smaller residential style filter that
has likely exceeded its life expectancy. Since the previous assessment, the multi-port valve has been replaced
and staff reported no issues with the filter. It was unknown when the sand was last replaced. As noted
earlier, sand media has an average life expectancy of 3-5 years and should be replaced.
Wading Pool Chemical Control
The chemical control system is a Strantrol System 3, the same as is used on the Main Pool. Again, this
controller is outdated technology and inadequate to meet the needs of the facility. We recommend a new,
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 9
user-friendly, web-based chemical controller that can reduce operational and maintenance issues. This new
technology also allows operators the ability to access and control settings remotely.
Bathhouse
The bathhouse is in fair condition for its age. The bathhouse had been modified recently to include a
chemical storage addition on the south end of the building. The change rooms and shower facilities are also
in fair condition; however, ADA accessibility is an issue and the building lacks appropriate ADA toilets and
shower amenities. In addition, multiple showers are not allowed to have a single drain point. The current
layout has the appropriate number of fixtures based on patron bather load: two urinals, two toilets and three
sinks in the Men’s locker room and the Women’s has four toilets and three sinks. The women’s change room
has two private change booths that have partitions. The hot water heater for the showers is undersized to keep
up with the demand required.
Current trends show a need for family change rooms that allows for a parent or guardian to keep young
children of either sex with them, rather than sending them into a locker room alone or bringing them into a
locker room of the opposite sex. To remedy this, we recommend the addition of two family style change
rooms. Other current trends for bathhouses include a central entrance from curbside to pool side with change
rooms on one side of the entry and admissions, staff and concessions on the other side of the entry. This
results in better control of users with minimal staffing.
Concessions
The current bathhouse configuration has the main entry area doubling as a concession area which is not very
effective and lack of space is an issue. The current layout and amenities allows for a very limited number of
products to be sold. A permanent dedicated concession area complete with a three compartment sink would
be more efficient and allow for increased serving options such as pre-packaged food, etc. This is also an
option that would allow for the facility to increase its revenue.
Deck Area
The majority of the deck area surrounding the Main Pool and Wading Pool is in good condition. There are a
few areas around the diving well where shifting and settling has created a number of raised areas or “toe
stubbers”. Sinking of slabs and extensive cracking has been caused by pipes leaking under deck along the
south side of the Main Pool. The sunken deck areas should be replaced after compacting fill underneath.
Several depth markers located around the Main Pool are missing the notation for inches. Code requires that
water depths be plainly marked in feet AND inches. The Wading Pool lacks any depth marking notation. If
the Wading Pool is not replaced, depth marking should be added.
The surrounding fence has a few spaces where gaps between posts and between mesh and concrete deck
exceeds the maximum allowed. Vinyl coated fence is preferred for aquatic facilities as it is more aesthetically
pleasing and has a longer life expectancy. The gate into the Wading Pool area must be self-closing, latching
and capable of being locked. The fence mesh should be adjusted as needed, as well as spacing between posts.
A self-closing mechanism should be installed on the Wading Pool gate.
The facility offers a small amount of shade and minimal table seating that allows patrons to stay longer which
would result in additional revenue. We recommend the addition of several shade structures around the pools.
Lighting for recreational swimming is required to be 10-foot candles and 30-foot candles for training and
competition. Light readings were not taken as the inspection occurred during the day. We recommend
reviewing lighting levels when lights are on, at least 1-hour after sunset.
The deck along the east side of the Main Pool has starting block anchors; however, State Health Code
requires a minimum pool depth of at least 5ft. Currently, starting blocks are not installed – and should not be
unless new anchors are installed where depth requirements are met.
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 10
SECTION TWO: OPTIONS
Option – 1 (Close outdoor pool)
Demolition
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to prepare for closing the
facility:
Demo and remove Main Pool, Wading Pool, and surrounding decks/fence Probable cost estimate: $20,000 - $22,000
Demolition of non-reusable Mechanical/Equipment Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000
In-fill existing pools Probable cost estimate: $3,000 - $4,000
Demo Bathhouse & Cap existing utilities Probable cost estimate: $9,000 - $10,500
Seed/sod lawn area Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,500
Subtotal: $39,500 - $46,000
Soft Costs (20%) $ 7,900 - $ 9,200
Estimated Demolition Cost Range: $47,400 - $55,200
Option – 1A (Close outdoor pool – Bathhouse remains)
Demolition
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to prepare for closing the
facility:
Demo and remove Main Pool, Wading Pool, and surrounding decks/fence Probable cost estimate: $20,000 - $22,000
Demolition of non-reusable Mechanical/Equipment Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000
In-fill existing pools Probable cost estimate: $3,000 - $4,000
Seed/sod lawn area Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,500
Subtotal: $30,500 - $35,500
Soft Costs (20%) $ 6,100 - $ 7,100
Estimated Demolition Cost Range: $36,600 - $42,600
Option – 2 (Repair Existing)
Main Pool
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the main pool area:
Install new main drain covers prior to 2015 swim season Probable cost estimate: $1,000 - $1,500
Replace missing/damaged skimmer weirs Probable cost estimate: $700 - $800
Demolition of decks and installation of ADA access ramp along west side of pool Probable cost estimate: $70,000 - $80,000
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 11
Replacement of damaged brick/coping, form pour new edge (353’) Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $18,000
Re-paint pool floor Probable cost estimate: $14,000 - $15,000
Cold joint repair around entire pool perimeter Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000
Replace missing ceramic tile Probable cost estimate: $1,800 - $2,200
Re-grout all pool tile Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,000
Subtotal: $112,000 - $126,900
Soft Costs (20%) $ 22,400 - $ 25,380
Estimated Main Pool Repair Cost Range: $134,400 - $152,280
Wading Pool
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the wading pool area: For
this option we recommend select demolition of the existing wading pool to allow for a zero-depth entry splash
pool, poured concrete coping with no additional above ground features:
Select demo of wading pool and removal of decks needed for zero-depth entry area Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,000
Modify wading pool to into 600 s.f. zero-depth entry splash pool with imbedded ground sprays Probable cost estimate: $100,000 - $115,000
Replacement of damaged brick/coping, form pour new edge Probable cost estimate: $3,800 - $4,200
Install new splash pool heater Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,500
Re-paint pool floor Probable cost estimate: $1,000 - $1,500
Install new main drain cover prior to 2015 swim season Probable cost estimate: $500 - $750
Subtotal: $ 114,300 - $131,950
Soft Costs (20%) $ 22,860 - $ 26,390
Estimated Wading Pool Repair Cost Range: $137,160 – $158,340
Mechanical/Equipment
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the pool equipment:
New pump strainer Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000
Replace pool pump with vertical mount high efficiency pump and premium motors and vfd Probable cost estimate: $13,000 - $14,000
Replace existing sand filters with regenerative media filters Probable cost estimate: $72,000 - $80,000
Construct pump pit Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $18,000
Update equipment room piping and valves Probable cost estimate: $10,000 - $12,000
Backwash standpipe Probable cost estimate: $1,600 - $1,800
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 12
Subtotal: $116,600 - $131,800
Soft Costs (20%) $ 23,320 - $ 26,360
Estimated Mech. Repair Cost Range: $139,920 - $158,160
Bathhouse
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend any work for repair of the Bathhouse.
Modify bathhouse, shower & toilets for proper ADA access Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $17,000
Adjust shower area/drains to meet code requirements Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000
Subtotal: $ 20,000 - $23,000
Soft Costs (20%) $ 4,000 – $ 4,600
Estimated Bathhouse Repair Cost Range: $24,000 - $27,600
Site
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the site area:
Select demo and removal of sunken/extensively cracked deck, compact fill and pour new Probable cost estimate: $11,000 - $12,500
Adjust fencing as needed, add-on to fencing around zero depth area & install self-closing gate Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $4,500
Subtotal: $ 15,000 - $17,000
Soft Costs (20%) $ 3,000 – $ 3,400
Estimated Site Repair Cost Range: $18,000 - $20,400
Option – 2 Total Estimated Cost Range: $471,480 - $516,780
Option – 3 (Renovate and Expand)
Main Pool
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for renovation and expansion of the
main pool area to include added amenities and features:
Install an aquatic climbing wall on side of the diving well. Installation of gutter cup anchors and rope
& float to be included Probable cost estimate: $36,000 - $38,000
Install new main drain covers prior to 2015 swim season Probable cost estimate: $1,000 - $1,500
Replace missing/damaged skimmer weirs Probable cost estimate: $700 - $800
Demolition of decks and installation of ADA access ramp along west side of pool Probable cost estimate: $70,000 - $80,000
Demo & remove coping, installation of new stainless steel perimeter gutter and surgetank Probable cost estimate: $190,000 - $210,000
Prep surface & install new quartz aggregate plaster finish with ceramic tile accents Probable cost estimate: $85,000 - $95,000
Cold joint repair around entire pool perimeter
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 13
Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000
Replace missing ceramic tile Probable cost estimate: $1,800 - $2,200
Re-grout all pool tile Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,000
Demo pool as needed for waterslide run-out Probable cost estimate: $6,000 - $6,500
Install waterslide, tower and related piping, etc. Probable cost estimate: $185,500 - $200,000
Subtotal: $585,500 - $645,000
Soft Costs (20%) $117,100 - $129,000
Estimated Main Pool Expansion Cost Range: $702,600 - $774,000
Wading Pool
Based on our review and analysis, we have determined it is not feasible or cost effective to attempt to repair
or renovate the existing wading pool. For this option we recommend the demolition of the existing wading
pool, and installation of a new larger splash pool with embedded sprays and several additional above ground
features:
Demo and remove existing wading pool Probable cost estimate: $4,500 - $5,500
Construct new 1,200 s.f. zero-depth entry splash pool complete with interactive play features &
quartz aggregate plaster finish Probable cost estimate: $265,000 - $290,000
Installation of new 3’ fencing to replace existing Probable cost estimate: $1,500 - $2,000
Install new splash pool heater Probable cost estimate: $5,500 - $6,500
Subtotal: $276,500 - $304,000
Soft Costs (20%) $ 54,200 - $ 60,800
Estimated Wading Pool Renovation Cost Range: $330,700 - $364,800
Mechanical/Equipment
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for repair of the pool equipment:
New pump strainer Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000
Replace pool pump with vertical mount high efficiency pump and premium motors and vfd Probable cost estimate: $13,000 - $14,000
Replace existing sand filters with regenerative media filters Probable cost estimate: $92,000 - $110,000
Construct pump pit Probable cost estimate: $18,000 - $20,000
Update equipment room piping and valves Probable cost estimate: $10,000 - $12,000
Backwash standpipe Probable cost estimate: $1,600 - $1,800
New slide vertical mount high efficiency pump and premium motor Probable cost estimate: $20,000 - $23,500
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 14
Subtotal: $159,600 - $187,300
Soft Costs (20%) $ 31,920 - $ 37,460
Estimated Mech. Repair Cost Range: $191,520 - $224,760
Bathhouse
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for renovation and expansion of the
bathhouse area:
Reloconfigure bathhouse to create a dedicated concession area facing the pool deck to include
required amenities needed for pre-packaged food service/sales. Probable cost estimate: $27,500 - $30,000
Add two family change rooms complete with bathroom/showers on to existing bathhouse. Probable cost estimate: $76,000 - $80,000
Modify bathhouse, shower & toilets for proper ADA access Probable cost estimate: $15,000 - $17,000
Adjust shower area/drains to meet code requirements Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000
Subtotal: $123,500 - $133,000
Soft Costs (20%) $ 24,700 - $ 26,600
Estimated Bathhouse Renovation Cost Range: $148,200 - $159,600
Site
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following work for the renovation and expansion of the
site area:
Demo and remove all decking, install new decking properly sloped to new deck drains. Probable cost estimate: $25,000 - $30,000
Addition of six shade umbrellas around site Probable cost estimate: $21,000 - $23,000
Adjust fencing as needed, install new fencing around waterslide tower, zero depth area & install self-
closing gate Probable cost estimate: $5,000 - $6,000
Subtotal: $ 51,000 - $59,000
Soft Costs (20%) $ 10,200 - $11,800
Estimated Site Renovation Cost Range: $61,200 - $70,800
Option – 3 Total Estimated Cost Range: $1,434,220 - $1,593,960
Option – 4 (Wet Deck/Spray Pad)
Pool Demolition
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to allow for the site to be
prepared for a new Spray Pad/Wet Deck:
Demo and remove Main Pool, Wading Pool and surrounding decks/fence Probable cost estimate: $24,000 - $26,000
Demolition of non-reusable Mechanical/Equipment Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000
In-fill existing pools
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 15
Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000
Seed/sod lawn area Probable cost estimate: $3,500 - $4,500
Subtotal: $35,500 - $40,500
Soft Costs (20%) $ 7,100 - $ 8,100
Estimated Demolition Cost Range: $42,600 - $48,600
Spray Pad/Wet Deck
Based on our review and analysis, we recommend the following demolition work to allow for the site to be
prepared for a new Spray Pad/Wet Deck:
800-1,000 s.f. Spray Pad/Wet Deck with recirculation system, imbedded features and surrounding
concrete decking Probable cost estimate: $245,000 - $270,000
Above ground play features Probable cost estimate: $125,000 - $150,000
New 4’ fencing around Spray Pad/Wet Deck Probable cost estimate: $4,000 - $5,000
Subtotal: $374,000 - $425,000
Soft Costs (20%) $ 74,800 - $ 85,000
Estimated Spray Pad/Wet Deck Cost Range: $448,800 - $510,000
Option – 4 Total Estimated Cost Range: $491,400 - $558,600
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 16
SECTION THREE: EXISTING FACILITY
Facility Layout
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 17
2014 Admission Rates
Daily Pass $4.25 (includes tax)
Punch Card (10 sessions) $35 + tax
Punch Card (over age 65) $20 + tax
Season Pass
o 1 adult $90 + tax
o 1 couple or 1 child & parents $115 + tax
o 2 children & parents $140 + tax
o 3 children & parents $190 + tax
o 4 or more children & parents $240 + tax
2013 School Expenditures
Category Budget
Salaries $56,173
Professional Services $2,320
Communications/Phone $182
Postage/Printing $740
Utilities $8,181
Liability Insurance $2,649
Travel/Mileage $400
General Supplies $9,377
Concessions Purchase $4,403
Credit Card $1,173
Red Cross fee $1,027
Total $86,625
2013 City Expenditures
Category Budget
Repairs & Maintenance Supplies $3,777
Professional Services $10
Insurances $4,016
Repairs/Maintenance $170
Training/Seminars -
License, Fees & Registration $650
Donation Civic Org. $6,500
*Capital Outlay $53,749
Pool Fill (water costs) $972
Salaries (staff time) $31,295
-
Total $101,139
2013 Expense total (School & City): $187,764
*Capital Outlay costs covered the added chemical room and pool heater
Revenue vs. Expense (2013-2007)
2013
Category Budget
Revenue $85,247
Expense $187,764
Profit (Subsidy) ($102,517)
2012
Category Budget
Revenue $86,681
Expense $144,847
Profit (Subsidy) ($58,166)
2011
Category Budget
Revenue $78,649
Expense $123,703
Profit (Subsidy) ($45,054)
2010*
Category Budget
Revenue $76,495
Expense $120,768
Profit (Subsidy) ($44,273)
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 18
2009*
Category Budget
Revenue $71,833
Expense $117,437
Profit (Subsidy) ($45,604)
2008*
Category Budget
Revenue $69,667
Expense $121,488
Profit (Subsidy) ($51,821)
2007*
Category Budget
Revenue $63,908
Expense $115,576
Profit (Subsidy) ($51,668)
*Indicates year(s) with estimated City operational expenses.
Revenue vs. Expenses
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 19
Census Information
Total Population: 7,378 (2012 estimate)
Households: 2,727
Families residing within the city: 1,910
Families with children under 18 = 42.5%
Population distribution by age:
o 17 & under 31.5%
o 18-24 6.6%
o 25-44 29.1%
o 45-64 20.4%
o 65+ 12.4%
When analyzing the estimated 2010 New Prague Census information the following information was
determined:
o The highest percentage of the population is those 17 and under at 31.5%. The second highest
age range is 25-44 at 29.1%, followed by the age range of 45-64 that accounted for 20.4% of
the population.
o This suggests an aquatic facility and added amenities that focuses on young families.
o The aquatic need is for a facility that offers a wider range of aquatic activities
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 20
2010 Attendance Information
Total afternoon and evening swim users 7,837
Average afternoon open swim users 101
Average evening swim session 29
Pool passes sold 120
10-session punch-cards 102
Swim lesson totals 693
o Afternoon admissions were split as 46% daily fee, 44% daily pass, 10% punch-card
o Evening admissions were split as 60% season pass, 32% daily fee, 8% punch-card
o Open swim was daily from 1-5pm and between 6pm – 8:30 pm on various evenings and
weekends
o Average attendance for afternoon open swim was 100.66 patrons
o Average attendance for evening open swim was 28.68 patrons
*Note: attendance data was only collected during the 2010 swim season
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 21
Existing Facility Photographs
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 22
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 23
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 24
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 25
SECTION FOUR: PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Option – 3 Renovate & Expand Existing Facility
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 26 of 30
Option – 4 Spray Pad/Wet Deck
(Sample shown on Existing Site)
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 27 of 30
Option – 5 New Family Aquatic Center
(Sample shown on Armory Site)
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 28 of 30
SECTION FIVE: NEW AQUATIC FACILITY ANALYSIS
The following are approximate construction costs for similar facilities. These numbers should be used for
planning purposes only as a guide in determining the relative cost of a new facility versus renovation of an
existing facility.
City: Population: Approx. Budget: Year Built:
Glencoe 5,628 $2,500,000 2000
Stewartville 5,926 $2,800,000 2006
Waseca 9,410 $3,600,000 2006
Redwood falls 5,253 $3,600,000 2008
Sleepy eye 3,598 $3,000,000 2009
Gaylord 2,307 $3,400,000 2009
La Crescent 4,860 $3,200,000 2010
Kasson 5,978 $3,200,000 2012
Cannon Falls 4,083 $3,990,000 -
Byron 4,965 $5,100,000 -
Pine Island 3,272 $2,600,000 -
Hutchinson 14,178 $5,500,000 -
Farmington 21,086 $7,077,000 -
New Prague 7,378 TBD -
*Primary Service area of 15 miles
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 29 of 30
APPENDIX A: EXISTING POOL DATA
SWIMMING WADING
POOL POOL
SIZE: 44 ft. x 75 ft. – 1 in. 20 ft. x 20 ft.
42 ft. x 38 ft. – 4 in.
15 ft. x 24 ft.
SURFACE AREA: SHALLOW WATER (< 5 FT) 3,469 sq. ft. 400 sq.ft.
DEEP WATER (> 5 FT) 1,609 sq. ft. ---
TOTAL: 5,078 sq. ft. 400 sq.ft.
SURGE CAPACITY:
REQUIRED (in gal.) 5,078 gallons 400 sq.ft.
SUPPLIED (in gal.) 5,078 gallons (in pool) 400 sq. ft. (in pool)
POOL CAPACITY: 210,000 gallons ~2,500 gallons
RATE OF FLOW:
FLOW RATE REQUIRED 548 gpm (6 hr turnover) 37.5 gpm (30gpm skimmer + 20% m.d.)
ACTUAL RATE OF FLOW ~ 450 gpm ~70 gpm
TURNOVER: ~7.8 hours ~36 min.
(6 hour max requ.) (2 hours max. requ.)
FILTER SIZE: 300 sq. ft. 25 sq. ft.
FILTER FLOW RATE: 7.33 gpm / s.f. 14.4 gpm / s.f.
BATHER LOAD: SHALLOW WATER 231 26
DEEP WATER 60 ---
TOTAL 291 persons 26 persons
USAQUATICS INC.
AQUATIC CONSULTING & DESIGN New Prague Municipal Swimming Pool
Assessment and Project Study
June 10, 2014
Page 30 of 30
APPENDIX B: 2010 COMMUNITY EDUCATION PLANNING SURVEY RESULTS
APPENDIX C: 2014 COMMUNITY SURVEY