new terminal

January 21, 2021

FNLNEW TERMINALPLANNING AND DESIGN

FNL NEW TERMINAL | CHARRETTE 1 | JANUARY 21, 2021 1

STAKEHOLDER CHARRETTE 1: VISIONING

VISIONING



AGENDA1. Introductions

2. Charrette Objectives

3. History of the Airport

4. Project Status

Break

5. Group Visioning

A. Role of a modern airport

B. Northern Colorado Influences

C. Case Study Airports

Break

6. Breakout Group Visioning

A. Site Design

B. Phasing and Expandability

C. Architectural Aesthetics

Break

7. Conclusion and Next Steps

1. INTRODUCTIONS


PHOTO BY NOCO AIRPORT


Chris Aronson

Reed Good

Emily Eyrich

Russ LeeJared Bass

Rick Zabel

Ken Snyder

DESIGN TEAM

OTHER KEY DESIGN TEAM MEMBERS

TODAY’S FACILITATORS

2. CHARRETTE OBJECTIVES


CHARRETTE OBJECTIVES

Outcomes

1. Achieve consensus on the project’s:• Vision

• Goals

• Critical Priorities

2. Obtain feedback from stakeholders about:• Site Amenity Priorities

• Phasing and Expandability Goals

• Architectural Aesthetic Preferences

3. Define opportunities and constraints


During the Visioning Session, we will receive input from stakeholders on their vision, goals, and critical priorities for the new airport terminal.



CRITICAL PRIORITIES

OPERATIONAL

FUNCTIONAL

GOALS

OVERALL PROJECT

ASPIRATIONS


GOALS (EXAMPLES)

• GATEWAY TO THE REGION

• SENSE OF PLACE

• GREAT PASSENGER EXPERIENCE

• BUSINESS AND LEISURE FRIENDLY

• MOST TECH-SAVVY AIRPORT

• WORLD CLASS FACILITY

• MULTIMODAL

• ICONIC ARCHITECTURE

• COMMUNITY FOCUSED

• FAMILY FRIENDLY

• SUSTAINABLE

• ICONIC ARCHITECTURE

• AIRLINE FRIENDLY

• OPTIMUM LEVEL OF SERVICE

• TRANSFORMATIVE

• FLEXIBLE FOR GROWTH



CRITICAL PRIORITIES (EXAMPLES)

• OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY

• ON BUDGET

• ON SCHEDULE

• BUILDING PERFORMANCE

• PLANNED FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS

• FUTURE-PROOFED INTERIOR LAYOUT

• INTUITIVE WAY FINDING

• PASSENGER EASE

• AMENITIES (LOW, MED, HIGH)

• ART INTEGRATION

• HISTORY DISPLAY

• ENERGY EFFICIENT

• CONCESSIONS REVENUE

• SECURITY


CHARRETTE SCHEDULE


CHARRETTE 1

• Today January 21, 2021

• Establish goals and priorities

• Stakeholder Collaboration

CHARRETTE 2

• February 11, 2021

• Sustainability Visioning

• Design Team Only

CHARRETTE 3

• March 4, 2021

• Presenting 3 design concepts

• Stakeholder Input

CHARRETTE 4

• May 6, 2021

• Reviewing 15% Concept Design


WE ARE HERE


DESIGN SCHEDULE

START

VISIONING

PROGRAMMING

15%

CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN

30%

SCHEMATIC

DESIGN

60%

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

95%

95% CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS

100%

100% CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS

APRIL 1, 2021 JULY 1, 2021 OCT. 21, 2021 FEB. 24, 2022 MAY 19, 2022JANUARY 2021

WE ARE HERE

CHARRETTE 1,2,3 CHARRETTE 4


3. HISTORY OF THE AIRPORT


TIMELINE

1963

Established

1979

Cities of Fort Collins & Loveland entered into

the first Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)

1983

Creation of the Public Airport Authority

1989

Original terminal completed

Max. 19 passengers

1991

Original IGA is dissolved. New IGA put in place. FNL

becomes a commercial airport.

1992

Fire station was built

2003

Allegiant Airlines regularly scheduled

Two double wide modular buildings were added to accommodate increase of passengers

2011

A new terminal is planned for 2013

2012

Operations of Allegiant Airlines has ended

because FNL had no control tower

TODAY

1,073 Acres

200 hangar units

Remote tower implemented

Planning new terminal



EVENT PHOTOS

Collings Foundation

Hangar Dance

Sun and Fun

Sun and FunEAA Chapter 515


COMMERCIAL SERVICE AT FNL

Collings Foundation

Hangar Dance

Sun and Fun

Sun and FunEAA Chapter 515


4. PROJECT STATUS

DIBBLE TERMINAL ANALYSIS


HOW DID WE GET HERE?AIRPORT MASTER PLAN

CARES ACT FUNDINGCATALYST FOR PROJECT START

PASSENGER DEMAND ANALYSIS

TERMINAL CASE STUDY

CURRENT TERMINAL CHALLENGES ▪ORIGINALLY COMPLETED IN 1989

▪ORIGINALLY DESIGNED FOR 19 PASSENGER AIRCRAFT

▪TERMINAL LIMITATIONS▪ LIMITED CAPACITY FOR MODERN NEEDS

▪ PASSENGER PRE-SCREEN SPACE

▪ SECURITY SCREENING – TECHNOLOGY LIMITS

▪ RESTROOM/PLUMBING

▪ ELECTRICAL/ COMM./TECH.

▪FULLY OUTDOOR BAGGAGE HANDLING

▪LACK OF AMENITIES

▪LACK OF FLEXIBILITY IN BUILDING STRUCTURE

▪LACK IN EXPANDABILITY

▪OUTDATED ARCHITECTURE



EXISTING TERMINAL BUILDING

SIZE: 25,000-30,000 SF

BUDGET: $12M FOR TERMINAL CONSTRUCTION

SCHEDULE: COMPLETED BY JULY 2024

GATES: 2 - SERVING A320 AIRCRAFT

GOAL: COMMERCIAL AIR TRAVEL

LEED: STRIVING FOR GOLD


CURRENT DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS


CURRENT DESIGN ASSUMPTIONSTERMINAL PROGRAM FROM MASTERPLAN


ANTICIPATED PROJECT BOUNDARY

(E) TERMINAL

PROPOSEDTERMINAL

POTENTIAL ENTRY ENHANCEMENTS

NEW PARKING LOT

BUILDING RESTRICTION

LINE

EXTENDED & UPDATED

APRON

5.GROUP VISIONING


PHOTO BY CITY OF LOVELAND


Outcomes


• Goals









THE ROLE OFMODERN AIRPORTS

GATEWAY TO TOURISM


CONDUCT COMMERCE


FACILITATE EDUCATION


FOOD & ENTERTAINMENT


ARTS & CULTURE


HUB FOR MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION


TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION


LANDMARKS & ICONS


WHAT VALUES DO YOU WANT TO SEE THE TERMINAL PERSONIFY?


SURVEY QUESTION

NORTHERN COLORADO


NOCO ARCHITECTURE


WHAT PART OF NORTHERN COLORADO DO YOU WANT THE TERMINAL TO EXEMPLIFY?


DISCUSSION QUESTION

WHAT WORDS WOULD YOU LIKE TO USE TO DESCRIBE THE NEW TERMINAL?


DISCUSSION QUESTION


CASE STUDIES: TERMINALS

FORT McMURRY AIRPORT


Graphic From Precedent Presentation in 2017

2017 CASE STUDY SUMMARY BY AIRPORT STAFF


2017 CASE STUDY SUMMARY BY AIRPORT STAFF

PHOENIX-MESA GATEWAY BELLINGHAM, WA KINGSTON, ONTARIO

MANHATTAN, KSST. JOHN BRITISH COLUMBIACHARLOTTE, NC

EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT


JACKSON HOLE AIRPORT


DUBUQUE, IOWA TERMINAL


CHEYENNE REGIONAL AIRPORT


ELMIRA CORNING REGIONAL AIRPORT


ALASKA AIRLINES FLAGSHIP LOUNGE



POLLING QUESTIONS

EAGLE COUNTY JACKSON HOLE DUBUQUE

ALASKA AIRELMIRACHEYENNE

6.BREAKOUT GROUP VISIONING


1. SITE DESIGN2. PHASING AND EXPANDABILITY3. ARCHITECTURAL AESTHETIC

BREAKOUT GROUPARCHITECTURAL AESTHETICS


PHOTO BY VFLA

COLORADO AVIATION ARCHITECTURE


ASPENGRAND JUNCTION

DENVER COLORADO SPRINGS EAGLE COUNTY

LOVELAND HANGAR

NOCO ARCHITECTURE


EXTERIOR AESTHETIC


TRADITIONAL CONTEMPORARY

1 2 3

4 5 6

7 108 9

INTERIOR AESTHETIC


TRADITIONAL CONTEMPORARY

12 3 4

56

76 8 9

OTHER AMENITIES


WHICH ARE MOST IMPORTANT IF WE HAVE FUNDS?

• HISTORY WALL

• EXTERIOR & INTERIOR ART

• CHILD FRIENDLY ACTIVITIES

• PET FRIENDLY FEATURES

• BUSINESS & CONFERENCE CENTER

• FAMILY FRIENDLY AREAS

• RESTAURANT & RETAIL

• OBSERVATION DECK

SUSTAINABILITY OPTIONS



•DAYLIGHTING

•SOLAR ARRAYS

•GEOTHERMAL

•ENHANCE HVAC

•BIOPHILIC DESIGN

•CONNECTION TO THE OUTDOORS

•LOW FLOW FIXTURES

BREAKOUT GROUPSITE DESIGN


PHOTO BY SHAWN SEDERGERG

AERIAL OF THE SITE


POINTS OF OPPORTUNITY


SITE EXPERIENCE



•DEDICATED ENTRY DRIVE

•GATEWAY FEATURE

•ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION

•OUTDOOR SEATING

SITE AMENITIES



•OUTDOOR ART

•ENHANCED ENTRY LANDSCAPE

•HAIL COVERS

•COVERED WALKWAY

•ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS

•BUS STOP

BREAKOUT GROUPPHASING/EXPANDABILITY




OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS

AVIATION DESIGN CONCEPTS


ANATOMY OF A TERMINAL SECTION OPTIONSDESIGN CONCEPTS


EXISTING FACILITIES

TERMINAL STUDY - 2018


Graphic From Dibble Terminal Study in 2018

MASTERPLAN ALTERNATIVES - 2020


Graphic From Mead and Hunt Masterplan Report

PHASING DIAGRAM - OPTION 1


PHASING DIAGRAM - OPTION 1

- POSITION THE NEW TERMINAL AT

THE WEST EDGE OF THE MAXIMUM

BUILDING LIMIT LINE SIMILAR TO THE

EXISTING TERMINAL.

PRO'S

- THE WEST POSITION OF THE NEW

TERMINAL TAKES UP MINIMAL SPACE

ON THE SITE.

- CENTERS THE NEW TERMINAL ON

THE NEW TAXIWAY FOR FRAMED

VIEWS OF PLANES APPROACHING.

- THE EXISTING TERMINAL CAN

EITHER BE SCREENED / RENOVATED

OR DEMOLISHED DURING A FUTURE

PHASE.

CON'S

- THE WEST POSITION OF THE NEW

TERMINAL ONLY ALLOWS THE

OPPORTUNITY FOR (2) AREAS OF

EXPANSION (NORTH & SOUTH) AND

RESTRICTS THE POTENTIAL FOR

OUTDOOR AMENITIES WEST OF THE

TERMINAL.


PHASING DIAGRAM - OPTION 2PHASING DIAGRAM - OPTION 2

- SETBACK THE NEW TERMINAL TO

THE EAST TO ALLOW FUTURE

EXPANSION TO THE WEST, NORTH

AND SOUTH.

PRO'S

- THE SETBACK POSITION CREATES

ADDITIONAL SPACE FOR OUTDOOR

AMENITIES WEST OF THE TERMINAL

AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR (3)

AREAS OF EXPANSION (NORTH,

SOUTH, & WEST).







PHASE.

CON'S

- THE SETBACK POSITION TAKES UP

MORE SPACE ON THE SITE.


PHASING DIAGRAM - OPTION 3PHASING DIAGRAM - OPTION 3

- SETBACK THE NEW TERMINAL TO

THE EAST TO ALLOW FUTURE

EXPANSION TO THE WEST, NORTH

AND SOUTH.

PRO'S

- THE INDENTED WEST PLAN

CREATES ADDITIONAL SPACE FOR

OUTDOOR AMENITIES WEST OF THE

TERMINAL AND THE OPPORTUNITY

FOR (3) AREAS OF EXPANSION

(NORTH, SOUTH, & WEST).







PHASE.

CON'S

- THE SETBACK POSITION TAKES UP

MORE SPACE ON THE SITE.

7. CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS



Outcomes


• Goals








CHARRETTE FOLLOW UP


www.surveymonkey.com/r/FLY-FNL

CHARRETTE SCHEDULE


CHARRETTE 1

• Today January 21, 2021

• Establish goals and priorities

• Stakeholder Collaboration

CHARRETTE 2

• February 11, 2021

• Sustainability Visioning

• Design Team Only

CHARRETTE 3

• March 4, 2021

• Presenting 3 design concepts


CHARRETTE 4

• May 6, 2021

• Reviewing 15% Concept Design


WE ARE HERE NEXT UPDATE


DESIGN SCHEDULE

START

VISIONING

PROGRAMMING

15%

CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN

30%

SCHEMATIC

DESIGN

60%

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

95%

95% CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS

100%

100% CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS

APRIL 1, 2021 JULY 1, 2021 OCT. 21, 2021 FEB. 24, 2022 MAY 19, 2022JANUARY 2021

WE ARE HERE

CHARRETTE 1,2,3 CHARRETTE 4

QUESTIONS?


new terminal

Documents